| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> the White House on the sex offender registry http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1783299174 Message started by Sprintcyclist on Jul 6th, 2026 at 10:52am |
|
|
Title: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Sprintcyclist on Jul 6th, 2026 at 10:52am
the White House will appear on the sex offender registry
|
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 6th, 2026 at 11:35am It certainly has a high concentration of sex offenders. I can't think of many people in the Trump regime who haven't been charged with or accused of sexual assault. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Armchair_Politician on Jul 6th, 2026 at 1:43pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 6th, 2026 at 11:35am:
It’s full of the Guardians of Pedophiles. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 6th, 2026 at 2:14pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 6th, 2026 at 1:43pm:
It certainly seems like being a sexual predator is a prerequisite for working with Trump. Donald Trump: Over 25 women have accused him of sexual misconduct, ranging from unwanted touching to rape. In 2023, a federal civil jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll. Pete Hegseth: Trump’s initial nominee for Secretary of Defense was investigated by police in 2017 for an alleged sexual assault in California; he was not arrested or charged. He paid the accuser an undisclosed amount and signed a non-disclosure agreement, maintaining that the encounter was consensual. Matt Gaetz: Trump’s initial nominee for Attorney General faced a House Ethics Committee investigation over allegations of sexual misconduct and illicit drug use. He withdrew from consideration. Rudy Giuliani: Trump’s former personal attorney faces multiple sexual assault lawsuits, including allegations of sexual assault, harassment, and workplace coercion. Walt Nauta: Trump’s personal valet and former military aide faced allegations in a Navy investigation of having inappropriate relationships and sending harassing messages to servicewomen. And that's just the tip of the iceberg. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 6th, 2026 at 7:51pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 6th, 2026 at 2:14pm:
Elon Musk: Trump’s nominee for "efficiency czar" was accused by a SpaceX flight attendant of exposing himself and offering to buy her a horse in exchange for a sexual favor in 2016. Robert F Kennedy Jr: Accused of sexually assaulting Eliza Cooney, a former family babysitter, in the late 90s. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 7th, 2026 at 3:42pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 6th, 2026 at 7:51pm:
Greggery, that's unfair. You can't just make unfounded allegations like this. Can you point to one person in the White House who's been proven in court to have sexually abused someone? Just one. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 7th, 2026 at 3:45pm Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 3:42pm:
|
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 7th, 2026 at 4:21pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 3:45pm:
DL? That's unfair, Greggery. Panther, our board's constitutional expert, said he'd never support a prez found liable for something like sexual abuse and defamation, it would be a bridge too far. He'd need to hear a verdict from a jury at the very least. Rule of law, innit. Oh look, we told Panther, the jury's back. Turns out he did it. Now now, Panther said, he has every right to appeal. That's his right in a free country with a proud rule of law, no? Until we hear the verdict from the appeal, all bets are off. So he appealed. Judge Kaplan found him liable - again. Moreso, Judge Kaplan said, he'd never seen a defendant so hostile in all his years. Pay up, he told DL, you're done. So we told Panther. Now now, Panther said, he can still take it to SCOTUS, as is his right in a free country with a rule of law. That's what we call justice. Rule of law, etc, etc, etc. Look, we said, if he takes it to SCOTUS and nothing happens, you'll have to say it - as is the victim's right in a free country with a proud rule of law. Panther? And with that, he was gone - poof! |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Armchair_Politician on Jul 7th, 2026 at 4:28pm
Don’t forget all the sex offenders the White House is protecting.
|
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 7th, 2026 at 5:24pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 4:28pm:
That's unfair, Armchair. Have they received an indictment by a court/courts to stand trial for such insidious allegations? That's the legal standard of our board's constitutional expert and proud American, Panther. Actually, he might have upped the standard at the time of reporting. He's a devout constitutional conservative, you see. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by lee on Jul 7th, 2026 at 6:26pm
So stupid. The Whitehouse isn't a living being. It therefore can't be a sex offender. ::)
Unless of course, the Democrats, who can't tell the difference between male and female, also can't tell the difference between a building and a person. ::) |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 7th, 2026 at 6:33pm lee wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 6:26pm:
He's got you there, leftards. The address on the SO register has to have an actual offender. Lee's right. We'll need a name. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 7th, 2026 at 7:17pm Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 6:33pm:
DONALD J.TRUMP Carroll v. Trump, No. 23-793 (2d Cir. 2024) The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held a nine-day trial. The jury found that Trump sexually abused Carroll and defamed her in his 2022 statements. The jury awarded Carroll $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 8th, 2026 at 4:37pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 7:17pm:
Oh look - he's gone. Poof! Off like a carton of milk left near Melania. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by greggerypeccary on Jul 9th, 2026 at 9:47am Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 8th, 2026 at 4:37pm:
Indeed. Trump appealed, arguing that the district court made several evidentiary errors, including admitting testimony from two women who alleged past sexual assaults by Trump and a recording of a 2005 conversation where Trump described kissing and grabbing women without consent. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reviewed the case for abuse of discretion. The court found that the district court did not err in its evidentiary rulings. The testimony of the two women and the 2005 recording were deemed admissible under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 415, which allow evidence of other sexual assaults in cases involving sexual assault claims. The court also found that Trump did not demonstrate that any claimed errors affected his substantial rights. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment, concluding that the evidentiary rulings were within the range of permissible decisions and that any potential errors were harmless. The court upheld the $5 million award to Carroll. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Armchair_Politician on Jul 9th, 2026 at 9:51am greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 7th, 2026 at 7:17pm:
Trumps lawyer said that the American people stand with Trump. No, they really don’t. Not according to a multitude of polls. |
|
Title: Re: the White House on the sex offender registry Post by Dirty Paki Khunt on Jul 9th, 2026 at 10:20am Armchair_Politician wrote on Jul 9th, 2026 at 9:51am:
Judges ruled that the American people don't decide damages in cases of sexual assault and defamation, dear. DEEP STATE !!! |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |