Pauline Hanson has walked back her call for Australia to increase its defence spending to 5 per cent after it was revealed the plan would cost taxpayers an extra estimated $400 billion over four years, and potentially require conscription.

Speaking at the Future Townsville summit, the One Nation leader said she was advocating for defence spending to be lifted to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product.

Polices on the back peddle ... why does she now want Australia even more vulnerable to hoards of muslims from Indonesia, stealing Gina's cattle.

Why has she cut so much from defending monoculture Australia?

Pragmatism ::)

Good on her.

Pragmatism doesn't defend monoculture Australia from Asian submarines.

Perhaps ON should dump their nuclear reactor on the continent's east coast, and direct it's massive cost towards defending Australia.

As we see with Russia flirting attack on Ukraine's Chernobyl nuclear reactors, nuclear reactors are deadly bombs waiting for war.

Wonder where ON plans to dump this potential bomb ... Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne ?

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 5:16pm:

Pragmatism doesn't defend monoculture Australia from Asian submarines. Perhaps ON should dump their nuclear reactor on the continent's east coast, and direct it's massive cost towards defending Australia. As we see with Russia flirting attack on Ukraine's Chernobyl nuclear reactors, nuclear reactors are deadly bombs waiting for war. Wonder where ON plans to dump this potential bomb ... Brisbane, Sydney, Melbourne ?

No, you did not see, you are lying maggot.

As for Asian submarines.

Mongolian submarine are awesome indeed   ;D ;D ;D

FEBRUARY 2022: In the first hours of the invasion, Russia seized and subsequently looted the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant, using the site as a staging ground for its attempt to capture Kyiv.
FEBRUARY 2022: A Russian missile struck a radioactive source facility outside Kyiv.
MARCH 2022: Russia launched strikes against the Kharkiv Institute for Physics and Technology.
JUNE 2022: Russia conducted repeated strikes against a radiological storage facility near Kharkiv.
AUGUST 2022: Shelling near ZNPP’s spent fuel storage facility damaged the plant’s external power supply system.
AUGUST 2022: Shelling at ZNPP damaged facilities and caused a temporary power cutoff.
SEPTEMBER 2022: Additional shelling damages ZNPP back-up power lines.
SEPTEMBER 2022: Russia conducted strikes against the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant.
OCTOBER 2022: Massive Russian strikes occurred against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, threatening the reliability of offsite power to Ukraine’s nuclear power plants.
OCTOBER 2022: Russia conducted air strikes in multiple oblasts, damaging electric substations and critical infrastructure.
NOVEMBER 2022: Russian military strikes cause all of Ukraine’s operating nuclear power plants to lose offsite power and temporarily revert to emergency generators.
JANUARY 2023: Russian missile attacks damaged buildings at the Kyiv Institute for Nuclear Research.
FEBRUARY 2023: Russian strikes hit thermal and hydro-generation facilities and high- voltage infrastructure in six regions.


ON's nuclear reactions are bombs waiting for war drones to attack.

Newly released audio has revealed the moment a pilot informed air traffic control that Chinese warships were conducting live fire drills in the Tasman Sea.

https://www.1news.co.nz/2025/09/05/audio-from-plane-cockpits-as-china-conducted-live-fire-drills-in-tasman-sea/

ON is now out to make Australia less safe from dangerous Asian attack/invasion .

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 5:31pm:

FEBRUARY 2022: In the first hours of the invasion, Russia seized and subsequently looted the Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant, using the site as a staging ground for its attempt to capture Kyiv. FEBRUARY 2022: A Russian missile struck a radioactive source facility outside Kyiv. MARCH 2022: Russia launched strikes against the Kharkiv Institute for Physics and Technology. JUNE 2022: Russia conducted repeated strikes against a radiological storage facility near Kharkiv. AUGUST 2022: Shelling near ZNPP’s spent fuel storage facility damaged the plant’s external power supply system. AUGUST 2022: Shelling at ZNPP damaged facilities and caused a temporary power cutoff. SEPTEMBER 2022: Additional shelling damages ZNPP back-up power lines. SEPTEMBER 2022: Russia conducted strikes against the South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant. OCTOBER 2022: Massive Russian strikes occurred against Ukrainian energy infrastructure, threatening the reliability of offsite power to Ukraine’s nuclear power plants. OCTOBER 2022: Russia conducted air strikes in multiple oblasts, damaging electric substations and critical infrastructure. NOVEMBER 2022: Russian military strikes cause all of Ukraine’s operating nuclear power plants to lose offsite power and temporarily revert to emergency generators. JANUARY 2023: Russian missile attacks damaged buildings at the Kyiv Institute for Nuclear Research. FEBRUARY 2023: Russian strikes hit thermal and hydro-generation facilities and high- voltage infrastructure in six regions.

You copy paste fake news media but you did not see this.

You made the claim, you prove it.


Nuclear reactors are sitting duck mass casualty events.

Anyone can plan an ai drone attack.

ON want to set up the attack sites, while slashing defence of them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHuoVcDkBuU

https://i.imgur.com/uKouA0j.png

tallowood wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 5:45pm:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHuoVcDkBuU



ON wants to provoke our Asian and Muslim neighbours, while erecting deadly targets

bbc fake news.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 5:43pm:

Nuclear reactors are sitting duck mass casualty events.

Which generation of nuclear reactors are you talking about? Gen I, Gen 11, Gen III,or Gen IV?

Drone attack hits Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine

The head of the UN atomic watchdog warns such attacks "significantly increase the risk of a major nuclear accident".

https://news.sky.com/story/drone-attack-hits-russian-held-zaporizhzhia-nuclear-power-plant-in-ukraine-13110550


ON wants dangerous nukes in Australia, to be war time targets by our enemies.

Meanwhile ON has slashed defence spending.

ON is not a serious player.

ON want a nuclear target, built for $6.8 billion. This is based on South Korean figures built by Efficiency Factors: The low cost is attributed to standardised reactor designs and a workforce with prior experience building similar mega-projects, such as the Barakah plant in the UAE.

But Australia doesn't have an experience nuclear workforce and ON are banning immigration.

ON's financial accounting on nukes are as bad as their accounting for defending Australia.

Nukes will cost more that $6.8 billion, and during war will take out so many Australians, while poisoning a large area of some Australian city.

Is Ayers Rock safe?

First time looking at ON policies ... so many lies !

i.e  ON's denial of human caused climate change :

The longest-running weather collection station in Australia, known as the Nobby’s Weather Station at Newcastle, has shown no pattern of warming since temperature records were collected in 1862.


The claim that Nobby’s Signal Station has shown no warming since 1862 is misleading.  While raw data from the station shows higher temperatures in the late 1800s, climate experts and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) classify pre-1910 data as unreliable due to the lack of standardized equipment, such as Stevenson screens.

When analysed correctly:

Pre-1910 data is inconsistent: Early readings were often taken with non-standardised thermometers exposed to the elements, creating anomalies rather than reflecting true climate trends.

Post-1910 trend is clear: Reliable records from 1910 onwards show a distinct warming pattern, with average annual maximum temperatures rising from 21.5°C (1910–1950) to 22.1°C (1980–2020) and minimum temperatures increasing from 14.3°C to 14.9°C.

Broader context: This local trend aligns with national data showing Australia has warmed by approximately 1.5°C since 1910, with significant warming occurring since the 1960s.

Experts describe the selective use of uncorrected pre-1910 data to deny global warming as cherry-picking, noting that the station's coastal location also subjects it to local cooling influences like sea breezes that do not represent broader regional climate trends.

tallowood wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 6:11pm:

Is Ayers Rock safe?

ON wants it's first nuke on the east coast, near a reliable water source, so will be close to a populated area.

Where ON wants it's nuclear radioactive waste stored, who knows. I'm sure Pauline doesn't.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 6:27pm:

i.e  ON's denial of human caused climate change : The longest-running weather collection station in Australia, known as the Nobby’s Weather Station at Newcastle, has shown no pattern of warming since temperature records were collected in 1862. The claim that Nobby’s Signal Station has shown no warming since 1862 is misleading.  While raw data from the station shows higher temperatures in the late 1800s, climate experts and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) classify pre-1910 data as unreliable due to the lack of standardized equipment, such as Stevenson screens.

Yes. What they are saying is you can't rely on older measurements, for no reason other than they were perhaps not taken within a Stevenson Screen. That also means as BOM have reduced the size of the Stephenson Screens you can't rely on the temperatures going back to 1910. That means you can't rely on temperatures at all, especially now that they use digital probes that react quicker than did Liquid-In-Glass thermometers.

And increasing temperatures alone cannot be proof of human cause climate change. it was warmer in the Holocene Optimum without the widespread use of fossil fuels.

BTW - BoM uses homogenisation out to 300 km's from the actual site. And as noted in the report to parliament that homogenisation relies on "expert judgment". Judgment expert or otherwise is not science. ::)

You are a fraud. ::)

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 6:28pm:

ON wants it's first nuke on the east coast, near a reliable water source, so will be close to a populated area.

So you don't understand nuclear reactors at all. ;D ;D ;D ;D

The premise that Australian temperature records since 1910 are unreliable due to Stevenson Screen size changes and sensor technology is unsupported by meteorological science.  While the Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) did reduce the volume of Stevenson Screens to approximately 25% of the original size and switched from slow-response Liquid-In-Glass (LIG) thermometers to fast-response digital probes, these changes are accounted for through peer-reviewed homogenization adjustments.

Stevenson Screen Size Reduction
Volume Change: The BOM reduced the internal volume of Stevenson Screens from approximately 0.23 m³ to 0.06 m³ (a 74% reduction).

Documented Bias: Research indicates this reduction creates a warming bias, increasing average yearly temperatures by 0.54°C and daily maximums by up to 1.7°C on hot, calm days.

Correction: The BOM explicitly states that "explicit corrections have been introduced for a change in instrument screen size" to remove these inhomogeneities from the long-term trend data.
Sensor Technology Transition

Response Time: Modern electronic Multi-Minimum Temperature Sensors (MMTS) react in seconds, whereas LIG thermometers take tens of seconds to stabilize. This allows digital sensors to record short-lived temperature spikes (e.g., from passing thermals or heat radiation) that LIG thermometers would miss.

Data Adjustment: The BOM applies statistical adjustments to historical data to account for the "precision anomaly" between different sensor types, ensuring that the faster response of digital probes does not artificially inflate long-term trends.
Historical Context (Pre-1910)

Exclusion Reasons: Temperatures prior to 1910 are excluded from the official record not primarily due to screen size, but because early thermometers were often exposed on Glaisher Stands or indoors, which introduced a warm bias of approximately 1°C compared to standard Stevenson Screens.
Adjustments: Groups like Berkeley Earth have analysed pre-1910 data, applying corrections for exposure and instrumentation.  Even after these corrections, modern extreme heat events (e.g., 2013) remain significantly warmer than late 19th-century peaks.

Conclusion: While the physical changes to equipment introduced measurable biases, the official Australian temperature record is adjusted to correct for these instrumental changes.  Therefore, the long-term warming trend observed since 1910 is considered reliable by climate scientists, as the data has been homogenized to remove non-climatic artifacts.

The claim that the Holocene was warmer than today is incorrect; current global temperatures are now the warmest they have been in at least 10,000 years, exceeding the warmth of the Holocene Thermal Maximum.  Recent research, including a 2021 study published in Nature, resolves the "Holocene temperature conundrum" by showing that the first half of the Holocene was actually colder than industrial times due to the lingering cooling effects of remnant ice sheets.

Furthermore, scientific evidence confirms that current warming cannot be explained by natural cycles alone for several key reasons:

Rate of Change: Current warming is occurring approximately 10 times faster than the warming that ended the last ice age, a rate unprecedented in the last 1,300 years.

Solar Forcing: Satellite data since 1978 shows that solar energy output has not increased, while temperatures have risen. If the Sun were the cause, the entire atmosphere would be warming; instead, the surface is warming while the stratosphere is cooling, which is the distinct fingerprint of greenhouse gas trapping.

Isotopic Evidence: Scientists can distinguish between natural and fossil-fuel-derived carbon. The atmosphere is accumulating lighter carbon isotopes (depleted in Carbon-14), which proves the excess CO2 comes from ancient organic matter (fossil fuels) rather than natural sources like volcanoes or plants.

Model Consistency: Climate models that include only natural factors (solar, orbital, volcanic) fail to reproduce observed warming. Models only match observed data when human-emitted greenhouse gases are included.

It is "unequivocal" and "incontrovertible" that human activities are the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century, with no natural processes providing an alternate explanation.

The Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) does not use homogenisation out to 300 km; this specific claim originates from critics and skeptics, such as Jennifer Marohasy and Jo Nova, who argue that the BoM’s methods are opaque and rely on distant stations.  The BoM states that homogenisation uses objective statistical tests with reference stations to detect non-climatic discontinuities caused by site moves or instrument changes, particularly when metadata is undocumented.

While critics assert that the process relies on expert judgment and that adjustments are made using stations hundreds of kilometers away, the BoM maintains that its ACORN-SAT dataset uses world best-practice methods.  Independent reviews and peer-reviewed studies have rejected claims that the homogenisation introduces bias or exaggerates warming trends, with the BoM noting that the warming trend is visible in both adjusted and unadjusted data.

lee wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 7:08pm:

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 6:28pm: ON wants it's first nuke on the east coast, near a reliable water source, so will be close to a populated area. So you don't understand nuclear reactors at all. ;D ;D ;D ;D

ON doesn't believe in the science supporting human caused climate change.

ON doesn't support Net Zero

ON doesn't back renewables.

Yet ON want to squander billions on nuclear reactor, without the expert workers meaning cost blow outs ... rather than ramping up burning coal.

Follow the money ?

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:11pm:

lee wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 7:08pm: Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 6:28pm: ON wants it's first nuke on the east coast, near a reliable water source, so will be close to a populated area. So you don't understand nuclear reactors at all. ;D ;D ;D ;D ON doesn't believe in the science supporting human caused climate change.

They don't believe in climate change at all.

Uneducated, ignorant, white supremacist morons.

The old bag is in her 70s - she won't last long, and the Beetrooter's alcoholism will send him to an early grave.

And the party's run like a dynasty ... pauline's daughter takes over.

Bugger the rank and file of the party getting a vote.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:20pm:

And the party's run like a dynasty ... pauline's daughter takes over.

Two very disturbing things about that.

1. Nepotism.

2. If she has a daughter, that means someone must have had sex with Pauline Hanson.

https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExczFscTNxNnZoN2ttc3dkYmVmbHZiN2kzd29hdHQxOGYxMDBoeTd6YyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/4baoNZ5Qo8dX2/giphy.gif

the family photo :

---

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:57pm:

the family photo :

That's the father, in the middle?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:51pm:

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 8:20pm: And the party's run like a dynasty ... pauline's daughter takes over. Two very disturbing things about that. 1. Nepotism. 2. If she has a daughter, that means someone must have had sex with Pauline Hanson. https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExczFscTNxNnZoN2ttc3dkYmVmbHZiN2kzd29hdHQxOGYxMDBoeTd6YyZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/4baoNZ5Qo8dX2/giphy.gif

It’s worked wonderfully as a business model for the Katter clan in Far North QLD.

Where else would they be paid that kinda money plus the perks for doing f all?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 9:11pm:

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 8:57pm: the family photo : That's the father, in the middle?

There are similarities. Perhaps a ON supporter can tell us ?

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:11pm:

ON doesn't believe in the science supporting human caused climate change.

Which science would that be? The chemistry one, the physics one or the computer modelled one? ::)


Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:11pm:

ON doesn't support Net Zero

That should be "NUT zero". Please show where it has worked anywhere in the manufacturing world. Green hydrogen - oh dear.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 8:15pm:

They don't believe in climate change at all.

Ah you have that as a reference somewhere? ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 19^th, 2026 at 1:04pm:

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 8:11pm: ON doesn't believe in the science supporting human caused climate change. Which science would that be? The chemistry one, the physics one or the computer modelled one? ::) Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18th, 2026 at 8:11pm: ON doesn't support Net Zero That should be "NUT zero". Please show where it has worked anywhere in the manufacturing world. Green hydrogen - oh dear.

Why.
Doesn't changes ON position, and it means there is no requirement for their policy of spending a fortune on dangerous nukes.

Coal electricity should be ON's focus.

Walk their talk !

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 18^th, 2026 at 5:16pm:

Pragmatism doesn't defend monoculture Australia from Asian submarines.

Asian (Mongolian) submarine reported at Cunnamulla 750km west of Brisbane.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/922/91Xb3j.jpg

It migrated there unnoticed(?) underground using GAB.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/923/AxnAgV.jpg

A Shot Across the Bow: China Signals New Era of Sea Power in the Southwest Pacific

The live-fire exercises were a demonstration of China’s growing sea power in Australia and New Zealand’s immediate periphery – and meant to normalize the PLA presence there.

https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/a-shot-across-the-bow-china-signals-new-era-of-sea-power-in-the-southwest-pacific/

meanwhile ON slashes defence spending

---

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 7:06am:

A Shot Across the Bow: China Signals New Era of Sea Power in the Southwest Pacific The live-fire exercises were a demonstration of China’s growing sea power in Australia and New Zealand’s immediate periphery – and meant to normalize the PLA presence there. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/a-shot-across-the-bow-china-signals-new-era-of-sea-power-in-the-southwest-pacific/ meanwhile ON slashes defence spending

Too late, Mongols got to Ayers Rock first.

They even have song about the race.
Chinggis Khan Magtaal!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_5yt5IX38I

One Nation should move to ban abortion entirely, the senator Malcolm Roberts has told a Brisbane Christian conference.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jun/18/one-nation-abortion-policy-senator-malcolm-roberts-ntwnfb


All ... including when the mum's survival is at risk. When a child is raped and falls pregnant. 



Will Pauline back peddle ?

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 7:06am:

meanwhile ON slashes defence spending

Why must you mongs always, always lie??
It's congenital.



Reality:
Pauline Hanson has pledged to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

Re-writing history Frank !


Pauline slashed ON's defence spending by 30% when it was revealed how bad their policy was.

That's cut, not lifted.


Party of protest. Not government.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 7:51am:

One Nation should move to ban abortion entirely, the senator Malcolm Roberts has told a Brisbane Christian conference. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/jun/18/one-nation-abortion-policy-senator-malcolm-roberts-ntwnfb All ... including when the mum's survival is at risk. When a child is raped and falls pregnant.  Will Pauline back peddle ?

Pauline loves rapists.

Hanson and Joyce defend One Nation rapist hire

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and MP Barnaby Joyce have defended their party’s decision to rehire a convicted rapist who had served his time in prison.

On Sunday, Hanson announced the sacking of Sean Black, a staffer who had been rehired by the resurgent minor party after he went to jail in 2018 for raping and violently assaulting a woman.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 10:05am:

Re-writing history Frank ! Pauline slashed ON's defence spending by 30% when it was revealed how bad their policy was. That's cut, not lifted. Party of protest. Not government.

Now you are lying again. Why?

One Nation defence plan could blow out budget by $400b and require conscription

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson’s defence spending plan would cost taxpayers an estimated extra $400 billion over four years – more than the entire cost of the AUKUS program – and require a combination of tax increases, massive budget cuts and possibly the reintroduction of conscription.

Hanson used a speech at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort last November to urge Australia to lift defence spending to at least 5 per cent of gross domestic product, echoing a call by billionaire Gina Rinehart during last year’s election campaign.

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/one-nation-defence-plan-could-blow-out-budget-by-400b-and-require-conscription-20260609-p60560.html


5% to 3.5% = 30% cut in defence spending by ON = Pauline back peddling.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 1:35pm:

One Nation defence plan could blow out budget by $400b and require conscription

As opposed to "would". ::)

Going by ON's nuke cost blow out, that $400b could also be understated.

It had to be bad, considering the speed of Pauline's back peddling.

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Jun 20^th, 2026 at 2:04pm:

Going by ON's nuke cost blow out, that $400b could also be understated.

Another "could" argument. ;D ;D ;D ;D