Epstein file says Trump “knew and funded underage sex parties” at his golf course

An FBI tip memorialized in the Epstein files alleges Trump knew about underage sex parties at a Trump golf course.

An FBI document from the U.S. Department of Justice Jeffrey Epstein files contains extraordinary allegations involving President Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and a Trump-owned golf course — claims that appear to have originated from a single tipster who contacted federal authorities in 2021.

The tipster claimed Trump knew about underage sex parties occurring at the golf course and that revenue from the club was used to fund them.

Epstein Files: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01249507.pdf

Ohh a tipster. Did they win the tipping competition?

lee wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 2:34pm:

Ohh a tipster. Did they win the tipping competition?

Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it.

When you're a star they let you do it.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 3:08pm:

Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it.

Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;)

lee wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;)

Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops?

Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please?

Cheers.

Quote:

The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property.

So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 and they did absolutely nothing about it. They completely ignored it and did no investigation in to it whatsoever.

Why on earth would they do that, why would they completely ignore this and not do an investigation, what would be the purpose of the dems to sweep it under the rug and pay no attention to it at all, even Kamala knew about it and kept it secret from the public influencing the presidential election, should she be charged.


Have they got a strong case to charge those that were in power at the time who covered up this information and kept it secret.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:

lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers.

Quote:

From an anonymous source.

The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:32pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous.

So why did the FBI under Biden not do anything about it, did they cover it up to protect someone?.

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:36pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. So why did the FBI under Biden not do anything about it, did they cover it up to protect someone?.

Oh wait, Maxwell was at Chelsea Bidens wedding in 2010, maybe she had some influence.

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:29pm:

Quote: The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property. So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 and they did absolutely nothing about it. They completely ignored it and did no investigation in to it whatsoever. Why on earth would they do that, why would they completely ignore this and not do an investigation, what would be the purpose of the dems to sweep it under the rug and pay no attention to it at all, even Kamala knew about it and kept it secret from the public influencing the presidential election, should she be charged. Have they got a strong case to charge those that were in power at the time who covered up this information and kept it secret.

Quote:

So this tip came in in 2021

There are much better arguments to defend the orange Pedo than you try for.

For 1 the 2021 date is well after Trumps association with Epstine. But we know it was reported in 21 not when it happened.

Maybe better is the fact that the calim of bodies buried behind a specific Green (19th). Surely if this were true even the FBI would have been capable of finding the remains ?? Rather makes the claims unlikely I would think.


Quote:

In the recordings, Trump stated he was aware of the underage sex parties

Not sure if they are saying that they have these recordings or not ? I suspect not or it would be case over.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:42pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:29pm: Quote: The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property. So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 and they did absolutely nothing about it. They completely ignored it and did no investigation in to it whatsoever. Why on earth would they do that, why would they completely ignore this and not do an investigation, what would be the purpose of the dems to sweep it under the rug and pay no attention to it at all, even Kamala knew about it and kept it secret from the public influencing the presidential election, should she be charged. Have they got a strong case to charge those that were in power at the time who covered up this information and kept it secret. [quote]So this tip came in in 2021

There are much better arguments to defend the orange Pedo than you try for.

For 1 the 2021 date is well after Trumps association with Epstine. But we know it was reported in 21 not when it happened.

Maybe better is the fact that the calim of bodies buried behind a specific Green (19th). Surely if this were true even the FBI would have been capable of finding the remains ?? Rather makes the claims unlikely I would think.


Quote:

In the recordings, Trump stated he was aware of the underage sex parties

Not sure if they are saying that they have these recordings or not ? I suspect not or it would be case over. [/quote]

But why would Biden not have the allegations investigated, they have been told about the murder of young girls and did nothing about it, how can that happen?.

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:36pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. So why did the FBI under Biden not do anything about it, did they cover it up to protect someone?.

The point I made is that it isn't an anonymous source Lee was wrong.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:47pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:36pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. So why did the FBI under Biden not do anything about it, did they cover it up to protect someone?. The point I made is that it isn't an anonymous source Lee was wrong.

Anonymous or not why would Biden order them not to investigate and cover up the murders?

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:46pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:42pm: Leroy wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:29pm: Quote: The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property. So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 and they did absolutely nothing about it. They completely ignored it and did no investigation in to it whatsoever. Why on earth would they do that, why would they completely ignore this and not do an investigation, what would be the purpose of the dems to sweep it under the rug and pay no attention to it at all, even Kamala knew about it and kept it secret from the public influencing the presidential election, should she be charged. Have they got a strong case to charge those that were in power at the time who covered up this information and kept it secret. [quote]So this tip came in in 2021 There are much better arguments to defend the orange Pedo than you try for. For 1 the 2021 date is well after Trumps association with Epstine. But we know it was reported in 21 not when it happened. Maybe better is the fact that the calim of bodies buried behind a specific Green (19th). Surely if this were true even the FBI would have been capable of finding the remains ?? Rather makes the claims unlikely I would think. [quote]In the recordings, Trump stated he was aware of the underage sex parties

Not sure if they are saying that they have these recordings or not ? I suspect not or it would be case over. [/quote]

But why would Biden not have the allegations investigated, they have been told about the murder of young girls and did nothing about it, how can that happen?.
[/quote]

You really think that Biden sees every FBI report ?

The DOJ controls the FBI and they are kept at arms length from the executive Branch (The President).
Except under Trump terms where the Orange Umpa Lumpa improperly involves himeslf regularly.

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:49pm:

Anonymous or not why would Biden order them not to investigate and cover up the murders?

Nobody has ever said that Biden had any knowledge of any of this. Biden is not present in the FBI's chain of command. It would be improper for Biden to have been involved.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:50pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:46pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:42pm: Leroy wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:29pm: Quote: The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property. So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 and they did absolutely nothing about it. They completely ignored it and did no investigation in to it whatsoever. Why on earth would they do that, why would they completely ignore this and not do an investigation, what would be the purpose of the dems to sweep it under the rug and pay no attention to it at all, even Kamala knew about it and kept it secret from the public influencing the presidential election, should she be charged. Have they got a strong case to charge those that were in power at the time who covered up this information and kept it secret. [quote]So this tip came in in 2021 There are much better arguments to defend the orange Pedo than you try for. For 1 the 2021 date is well after Trumps association with Epstine. But we know it was reported in 21 not when it happened. Maybe better is the fact that the calim of bodies buried behind a specific Green (19th). Surely if this were true even the FBI would have been capable of finding the remains ?? Rather makes the claims unlikely I would think. [quote]In the recordings, Trump stated he was aware of the underage sex parties Not sure if they are saying that they have these recordings or not ? I suspect not or it would be case over.

But why would Biden not have the allegations investigated, they have been told about the murder of young girls and did nothing about it, how can that happen?.
[/quote]

You really think that Biden sees every FBI report ?

The DOJ controls the FBI and they are kept at arms length from the executive Branch (The President).
Except under Trump terms where the Orange Umpa Lumpa improperly involves himeslf regularly.
[/quote]

So for four years as president of the US Biden was never told about these crimes. Not once in his meetings with the FBI director who reports to Biden mentioned that they had a tip that Trump had murdered girls buried on his golf course. Thats what you are going with here.

Quote:

Trump “knew about and funded underage sex parties”

Is this really such a big deal considering we know that there are other reports that say Trump attended and partisipated in sex party's ?

Consider that even Donald told us that Jeffrey is a lot of fun and likes his girls on the young side ?

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 6:02pm:

Quote: Trump “knew about and funded underage sex parties” Is this really such a big deal considering we know that there are other reports that say Trump attended and partisipated in sex party's ? Consider that even Donald told us that Jeffrey is a lot of fun and likes his girls on the young side ?

So its no big deal that information about girls murdered and buried on a golf course was completely ignored?.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:32pm:

The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous.

Mea Culpa. I was wrong. The tipster had strong ties to the Sinaloa Cartel. But he was able to walk away because of his stronger ties to Epstein. So Epstein had stronger ties to the Sinaloa Cartel. This person also mailed the evidence to a lawyer in the Cayman's for some reason. Protection? He seems to have a lot of protection by the Epstein and Maxwell.

Of course with the FBI having that knowledge, why haven't they searched for and discovered the bodies?

lee wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 6:07pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. Mea Culpa. I was wrong. The tipster had strong ties to the Sinaloa Cartel. But he was able to walk away because of his stronger ties to Epstein. So Epstein had stronger ties to the Sinaloa Cartel. This person also mailed the evidence to a lawyer in the Cayman's for some reason. Protection? He seems to have a lot of protection by the Epstein and Maxwell. Of course with the FBI having that knowledge, why haven't they searched for and discovered the bodies?

Quote:

FBI having that knowledge, why haven't they searched for and discovered the bodies?

I said the same thing ?

I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties".

Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7.

Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:32pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous.

I see. So why did Lee tell fibs?

And why is Bobby still in hiding?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 7:18pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. I see. So why did Lee tell fibs? And why is Bobby still in hiding?

Lee made a mistake - It happens to all of us.

Bob enjoys a round of peek a boo.

Leroy wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 5:29pm:

Quote: The allegations in the report grow even more sensational. According to the FBI summary, the caller alleged that former television personality Robin Leach strangled a young girl during one of the parties and that the victim was buried behind the course’s 19th hole. The caller claimed to know of three separate instances in which girls were murdered and buried on the property. So this tip came in in 2021, dems were in power from 2021-2925 ...

That's an awfully long term.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 7:13pm:

I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/

My guess is that it wouldn't be one of those who consistently try to cover it up and or support it ?

Dnarever wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 7:46pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 7:18pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 5:32pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:46pm: lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 4:04pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 3:08pm: Yes it looks like they tipped Trump to win the underaged stakes as well as to fund it. Oh "looks like"?  From an anonymous source. Or an anonymous on the sauce? ;) Hard to say, Lee. Q dropped anonymous tips all the time. Are you questioning the validity of such high level drops? Excuse me, Bobby, Lee appears to be skeptical of your source. Could you confirm that DL still plans to start the Storm, please? Cheers. Quote: From an anonymous source. The persons name and age are blacked out - the accusation is not anonymous. I see. So why did Lee tell fibs? And why is Bobby still in hiding? Lee made a mistake - It happens to all of us. Bob enjoys a round of peek a boo.

Yes, Bobby does seem to enjoy playing cutsie-pie. He'll be back rooting our legs in a mo, poor thing, you'll see.

Still, good to see Lee owning up, we saw that. No doubt he's learned from this one.

After a mishtake of this magnitude, how could he ever get so confused ever again?

aquascoot wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 7:13pm:

I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/

MAGA gives a lot of thought to gay sex. You too?

Muriel wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 8:46pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 7:13pm: I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/ MAGA gives a lot of thought to gay sex. You too?

https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/32/7c/b8/327cb8ef09dd552fea641f3f4b47ca53.gif

Muriel wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 8:46pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 7:13pm: I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/ MAGA gives a lot of thought to gay sex. You too?

Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen.

Lindsey has had more cocks down his throat than Melania.

And that's saying something.

Melania was known as the Swallower of Slovenia, before Epstein sold her to Diaper Don.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 10:21pm:

Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen.

A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 10:21pm:

Muriel wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 8:46pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 7:13pm: I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/ MAGA gives a lot of thought to gay sex. You too? Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. Lindsey has had more cocks down his throat than Melania. And that's saying something. Melania was known as the Swallower of Slovenia, before Epstein sold her to Diaper Don.

Disgusting sex talk.

Also misogyny.

Bobby. wrote on Jun 12^th, 2026 at 2:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Muriel wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 8:46pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 7:13pm: I wonder which forum member would start a topic on " underage sex parties". Who. I wonder, has this on his mind 24/7. Definitely needs watching 👀  :-/ MAGA gives a lot of thought to gay sex. You too? Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. Lindsey has had more cocks down his throat than Melania. And that's saying something. Melania was known as the Swallower of Slovenia, before Epstein sold her to Diaper Don. Disgusting sex talk. Also misogyny.

It's common knowledge, Bobby. I mean, everybody's saying it, no?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 12^th, 2026 at 2:39pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 2:31pm: Disgusting sex talk. Also misogyny. It's common knowledge, Bobby. I mean, everybody's saying it, no?

The lack of morality is more proof of the End Times.

lee wrote on Jun 12^th, 2026 at 1:23pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D

Quote:

raped a woman

Only 1, he was only convicted for 1.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12^th, 2026 at 9:00pm:

Only 1, he was only convicted for 1.

Nope. Where do you get your news CNN? ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 1:06pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. Nope. Where do you get your news CNN? ;D ;D ;D ;D

It was an accusation from some old bag who conveniently
came up with a story at election time from 20 or 30 years ago -
and it wasn't a criminal court.    ::)

It was a Democrat plot.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12^th, 2026 at 9:00pm:

lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1.

The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this.

Leroy wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 1:43pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this.

Quote:

A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages.

The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 2:44pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 1:43pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this. [quote]A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages.

The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape.
[/quote]

Correct me if I'm wrong dnever but is that the very same jury that gave him a not guilty verdict on the charge of rape. So you are disputing the verdict of the jury and saying g they lied.

Dnarever wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 2:44pm:

The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape.

You do know a judge's declaration, after a jury's verdict, is mere noise and not a part of the jury's findings? ::)

:-*
greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 1:57pm:

Epstein file says Trump “knew and funded underage sex parties” at his golf course An FBI tip memorialized in the Epstein files alleges Trump knew about underage sex parties at a Trump golf course. An FBI document from the U.S. Department of Justice Jeffrey Epstein files contains extraordinary allegations involving President Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and a Trump-owned golf course — claims that appear to have originated from a single tipster who contacted federal authorities in 2021. The tipster claimed Trump knew about underage sex parties occurring at the golf course and that revenue from the club was used to fund them.

Never mind the bollocks, lying creep.


https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKqEzKDbcAAGnJO?.jpg

Dnarever wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 2:44pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 1:43pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this. [quote]A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages.

The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape.
[/quote]

Indeed.

Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist.

This is an indisputable fact.

Moreover, that's how he'll always be remembered: a rapist who was best friends with the world's most notorious child sex offender.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 2:44pm: Leroy wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 1:43pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this. [quote]A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages. The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape.

Indeed.

Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist.

This is an indisputable fact.

Moreover, that's how he'll always be remembered: a rapist who was best friends with the world's most notorious child sex offender.

[/quote]

Well I can say this with confidence, Trump has the same amount of rape convictions as greg or Dnaver.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist.

Nope.


Adjudicated -     To make a decision (in a legal case or proceeding), as where a judge or arbitrator rules on some disputed issue or claim between the parties.

There was no ruling from the judge. He made a comment, after the rulings were given. ::)

There was no evidence led to alleged rape, therefore he didn't have any dispute to rule on. ::)

Leroy wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 4:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 2:44pm: Leroy wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 1:43pm: Dnarever wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 9:00pm: lee wrote on Jun 12th, 2026 at 1:23pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 10:21pm: Donald Trump and Lindsey Graham are two of the biggest homo queens the GOP has ever seen. A homo who raped a woman? oh noes. ;D ;D ;D ;D Quote: raped a woman Only 1, he was only convicted for 1. The only time Trump faced a rape charge he was found not guilty, can you provide a link to his rape conviction because the media have not picked up on this. [quote]A jury verdict in May 2023 found Trump liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll, and ordered him to pay US$5 million in damages. The sexual assault charge he was found to be guilty of is the one where the Judge declaired that the offence he was guilty of is what people call rape. Indeed. Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. This is an indisputable fact. Moreover, that's how he'll always be remembered: a rapist who was best friends with the world's most notorious child sex offender.

Well I can say this with confidence, Trump has the same amount of rape convictions as greg or Dnaver.
[/quote]

Neither of us were found guilty of sexuasl assault and ordered to pay $5 Million in compensation to our victum? Donald was !

And here you are once again defending the indefencible, openly supporting sexual assault.

lee wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 6:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope.

Yep.

Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence.

The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally".

The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time.

Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist.

The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will?

lee wrote on Jun 13^th, 2026 at 6:00pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Adjudicated -     To make a decision (in a legal case or proceeding), as where a judge or arbitrator rules on some disputed issue or claim between the parties. There was no ruling from the judge. He made a comment, after the rulings were given. ::) There was no evidence led to alleged rape, therefore he didn't have any dispute to rule on. ::)

The ruling was sexual assault, the Judges clarification was to say that this ruling is what people call rape.

Still trying to defend rape I see ? (and failing badly)

It is a fact that over 30 woman and at least 1 adolescent have accused him of sexual assault, he was recorded bragging about routinely sexual assaulting woman and recorded bragging about walking into miss america dressing rooms with naked 14 year old girls. And still you defend him?

Dnarever wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:21pm:

lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Adjudicated -     To make a decision (in a legal case or proceeding), as where a judge or arbitrator rules on some disputed issue or claim between the parties. There was no ruling from the judge. He made a comment, after the rulings were given. ::) There was no evidence led to alleged rape, therefore he didn't have any dispute to rule on. ::) The ruling was sexual assault, the Judges clarification was to say that this ruling is what people call rape. Still trying to defend rape I see ? (and failing badly) It is a fact that over 30 woman and at least 1 adolescent have accused him of sexual assault, he was recorded bragging about routinely sexual assaulting woman and recorded bragging about walking into miss america dressing rooms with naked 14 year old girls. And still you defend him?

Can you tell us what the verdict of the jury was in that case when they asked them for a verdict on the count of rape?.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:03pm:

lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Yep. Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence. The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally". The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time. Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist. The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will?

Why do they do it?   :-/

Are they sexual predators themselves?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 2:27pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:03pm: lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Yep. Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence. The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally". The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time. Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist. The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will? Why do they do it?   :-/ Are they sexual predators themselves?

Why must you always lie, lie, lie, creep?

Please explain.

Frank wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 3:29pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 2:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:03pm: lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Yep. Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence. The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally". The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time. Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist. The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will? Why do they do it?   :-/ Are they sexual predators themselves? Why must you always lie, lie, lie, creep? Please explain.

Oh, you're not defending Trump?

You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 3:36pm:

Frank wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 3:29pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 2:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:03pm: lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Yep. Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence. The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally". The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time. Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist. The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will? Why do they do it?   :-/ Are they sexual predators themselves? Why must you always lie, lie, lie, creep? Please explain. Oh, you're not defending Trump? You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

If it were proven beyond reasonable doubt I would.

It hasn't been so I don't.

Frank wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 3:36pm: Frank wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 3:29pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 2:27pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:03pm: lee wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 6:00pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 13th, 2026 at 4:06pm: Donald Trump is an adjudicated rapist. Nope. Yep. Legal & Court Decisions: In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence. The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally". The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time. Donald J. Trump is an adjudicated rapist. The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will? Why do they do it?   :-/ Are they sexual predators themselves? Why must you always lie, lie, lie, creep? Please explain. Oh, you're not defending Trump? You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? If it were proven beyond reasonable doubt I would. It hasn't been so I don't.

And there we have it, folks.

Frank continues to defend an adjudicated sexual abuser of women.

Well colour me unimpressed.


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:03pm:

In the justice system, a case is "adjudicated" when a judge or arbiter reviews the facts, evidence, and legal arguments, and makes a final ruling or issues a sentence.

Which he must do in the court. Not AFTER  the court is finished. ::)


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:03pm:

The presiding Judge Lewis Kaplan clarified that "the jury's finding that Mr. Trump 'sexually abused' Ms. Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally".

AFTER the court case. ::)


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:03pm:

The judge stated that this act fits the common, modern understanding and broader federal definitions of rape, even if it did not meet New York's narrow statutory definition at the time.

So it wasn't rape, as it didn't fit the New York definition, at the time.  ::)


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:03pm:

The question we all need to ask is, why do you and so many others on here defend a "man" who violently penetrated a woman's vagina against her will?

Where have I defended him? I have only talked abvout the case. ::)

lee wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 4:57pm:

Which he must do in the court. Not AFTER  the court is finished.

Says who?

lee wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 4:57pm:

Where have I defended him? I have only talked abvout the case.

You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

Dnarever wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:21pm:

The ruling was sexual assault, the Judges clarification was to say that this ruling is what people call rape.

After the case was over. It didn't form a part of the judgement. ::)
Dnarever wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 1:21pm:

Still trying to defend rape I see ? (and failing badly)

So I will ask you - Where have I defended him? ::)

You are really going loopy. ;)

lee wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 5:00pm:

Dnarever wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:21pm: The ruling was sexual assault, the Judges clarification was to say that this ruling is what people call rape. After the case was over. It didn't form a part of the judgement. ::) Dnarever wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 1:21pm: Still trying to defend rape I see ? (and failing badly) So I will ask you - Where have I defended him? ::) You are really going loopy. ;)

You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 4:59pm:

You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

Do I? So tell us precisely when the plaintiff offered her circumstances to her friends. No timeline  and yet it was treated as contemporaneous. ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 5:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 4:59pm: You condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? Do I?

Tell us, lee.

Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

Frank doesn't.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 5:43pm:

Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent?

So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that.

lee wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 6:28pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 5:43pm: Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that.

There we have it, folks.

Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 6:55pm:

lee wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 5:43pm: Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that. There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent.

When you're a star they let you do it.

lee wrote on Jun 11^th, 2026 at 2:34pm:

Ohh a tipster. Did they win the tipping competition?

Defending pedophilia and pseudo-science is all lee can seem to do

Bobby. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: lee wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 5:43pm: Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that. There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. When you're a star they let you do it.

Pay attention.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 9:05am:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: lee wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 5:43pm: Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that. There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. When you're a star they let you do it. Pay attention.

TRUMP - grab them by the .....  jump to 0:37


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYqKx1GuZGg

Bobby. wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: lee wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 5:43pm: Do you condemn him unconditionally for forcibly penetrating Carroll without her consent? So they did accept hearsay, without proof of it being contemporaneous. Thanks for that. There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. When you're a star they let you do it.

Trump said that not the women he assaulted, not one of the wonen that he assaulted ever agreed that this was true. Some said that they were slow to react because they were in shock.

Marla wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 12:24am:

lee wrote on Jun 11th, 2026 at 2:34pm: Ohh a tipster. Did they win the tipping competition? Defending pedophilia and pseudo-science is all lee can seem to do

You have been on the dope too long dopey. I have never defended paedophilia or pseudo-science. Perhaps you can provide details of your asumptions? ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14^th, 2026 at 6:55pm:

There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent.

I have detailed my concerns about the case. The use of hearsay evidence that was not, in any way subject to any test for having been made as to it being contemporaneous. That you have ignored that is on you.

That does not make me guilty of anything. Condemnation comes from proof, not a flawed jury system.

lee wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 11:15am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. I have detailed my concerns about the case. The use of hearsay evidence that was not, in any way subject to any test for having been made as to it being contemporaneous. That you have ignored that is on you. That does not make me guilty of anything. Condemnation comes from proof, not a flawed jury system.

You're guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 11:18am:

lee wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. I have detailed my concerns about the case. The use of hearsay evidence that was not, in any way subject to any test for having been made as to it being contemporaneous. That you have ignored that is on you. That does not make me guilty of anything. Condemnation comes from proof, not a flawed jury system. You're guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser.

You are lying, despicable creep. Why are you always lying?

Please explain.

Frank wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 11:36am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 11:18am: lee wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 11:15am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. I have detailed my concerns about the case. The use of hearsay evidence that was not, in any way subject to any test for having been made as to it being contemporaneous. That you have ignored that is on you. That does not make me guilty of anything. Condemnation comes from proof, not a flawed jury system. You're guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser. You are lying, despicable creep. Why are you always lying? Please explain.

You're also guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 11:18am:

You're guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser.

Nope. Merely not believing. not believing is not "defending".

Acording to you, you don't believe in God, that is not defending Him. ::)

lee wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 1:11pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 11:18am: You're guilty of defending an adjudicated sexual abuser. Nope. ...

Yep.

From you that is almost smart. :)

lee wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 11:15am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 14th, 2026 at 6:55pm: There we have it, folks. Both Frank and lee think it's perfectly okay for Trump to forcibly penetrate a woman without her consent. I have detailed my concerns about the case. The use of hearsay evidence that was not, in any way subject to any test for having been made as to it being contemporaneous. That you have ignored that is on you. That does not make me guilty of anything. Condemnation comes from proof, not a flawed jury system.

I know, right? Funny how Alina Habba never objected to the use of hearsay during the trial. Strange how Todd Blanche never picked up on it on appeal.

Good thing DL found him a job as Attorney General. He clearly failed as a lawyer.

The big fella tried appointing Alina US Attorney for New Jersey, but the courts wised up to that.

Hang on, they said, you expect us to affirm some failed hack who doesn't even know the most basic definition of hearsay? The woman can't even write a grand jury indictment - she's fired.

You'd expect Congress to say the same thing when Todd's nomination comes up, but I'm curious.

What was your previous view on sinister, unelected incompetents and back-room operatives destroying our sovereignty and taking away our RIGHTS?

DEEP STATE !!!

TRUMP -

When you're a star they let you do it -

- grab them by the .....  jump to 0:37


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYqKx1GuZGg

Bobby. wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

TRUMP - When you're a star they let you do it - - grab them by the .....  jump to 0:37 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYqKx1GuZGg

That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy?

Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who.

You?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 7:06pm:

That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy? Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who. You?

He said he'd hang em and hang em high.


https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/a6/5c/26/a65c26e7c5731362d4b7cb5fb2699d33.png

Bobby. wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 7:26pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:06pm: That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy? Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who. You? He said he'd hang em and hang em high. https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/a6/5c/26/a65c26e7c5731362d4b7cb5fb2699d33.png

Right. So now he's hushed it all up and let them all off, what would you like to inform Lee about the use of hearsay?

Thoughts?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 6:44pm:

Funny how Alina Habba never objected to the use of hearsay during the trial. Strange how Todd Blanche never picked up on it on appeal.

And nothing to do with the argument. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 6:44pm:

What was your previous view on sinister, unelected incompetents and back-room operatives destroying our sovereignty and taking away our RIGHTS?

Which rights do you have in Australia? The Labor Government recently proposed tackling mis/disinformation, including climate mis/disinformation,  except the government's own entities are exempt. ::)

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 7:34pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:26pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:06pm: That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy? Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who. You? He said he'd hang em and hang em high. https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/a6/5c/26/a65c26e7c5731362d4b7cb5fb2699d33.png Right. So now he's hushed it all up and let them all off, what would you like to inform Lee about the use of hearsay? Thoughts?

I'm disappointed - I wanted to see the hangings of all those traitors.    :-[

lee wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 7:51pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 6:44pm: Funny how Alina Habba never objected to the use of hearsay during the trial. Strange how Todd Blanche never picked up on it on appeal. And nothing to do with the argument. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Your DL's legal defence has nothing to do with your argument?

Come come, dear, if you're going to use your ignorance of jurisprudence to make your case, you could probably use a few less giggles.

Perhaps you could take a page out of Bobby's book and try a bit of good, old-fashioned bottery.

DEEP STATE !!!

Bobby. wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 8:04pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:34pm: Bobby. wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:26pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:06pm: That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy? Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who. You? He said he'd hang em and hang em high. https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/a6/5c/26/a65c26e7c5731362d4b7cb5fb2699d33.png Right. So now he's hushed it all up and let them all off, what would you like to inform Lee about the use of hearsay? Thoughts? I'm disappointed - I wanted to see the hangings of all those traitors.    :-[

I see. So would you like to advise Lee that an argument is not hearsay if (a) it is not being used to prove the truth of the assertion and (b) the witness makes themselves available to the court for cross-examination?

We'll reserve the right to supplementaries.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 8:09pm:

Your DL's legal defence has nothing to do with your argument?

Exactly. You finally got it. My argument was about hearsay evidence, its contemporaneous nature (how close to the alleged offence was it talked about), not what his legal team did or didn't do. ::)

lee wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 1:22pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 8:09pm: Your DL's legal defence has nothing to do with your argument? Exactly. You finally got it. My argument was about hearsay evidence, its contemporaneous nature (how close to the alleged offence was it talked about), not what his legal team did or didn't do. ::)

I see. So why do you think his legal team did or didn't use your cunning defence?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 2:27pm:

So why do you think his legal team did or didn't use your cunning defence?

That comes under the "don't care" factor. ;)

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15^th, 2026 at 8:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 8:04pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:34pm: Bobby. wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:26pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 15th, 2026 at 7:06pm: That's right, Bobby. Can you remind us all what you said DL would do with that cabal of sinister DEEP STATE kiddie fiddlers running our governments and global economy? Lee's taken to calling it all hearsay. E Jean, Epstein Airlines, and the name at the top of the Epstein client list, you-know-who. You? He said he'd hang em and hang em high. https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/a6/5c/26/a65c26e7c5731362d4b7cb5fb2699d33.png Right. So now he's hushed it all up and let them all off, what would you like to inform Lee about the use of hearsay? Thoughts? I'm disappointed - I wanted to see the hangings of all those traitors.    :-[ I see. So would you like to advise Lee that an argument is not hearsay if (a) it is not being used to prove the truth of the assertion and (b) the witness makes themselves available to the court for cross-examination? We'll reserve the right to supplementaries.

Where are the hangings?   :-/

Meh.

Trump has successfully flooded the zone.
MMA at the white house.
So much novelty
So stimulating
People love novelty and stimulation
He can do what he likes.

Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him.
They are neither novel nor stimulating
They are boring and repetitive
They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade.

This is what winning looks like 👍

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 3:28pm:

Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation

Tell that to the parents of the 150 schoolgirls he slaughtered.

lee wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 2:35pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 2:27pm: So why do you think his legal team did or didn't use your cunning defence? That comes under the "don't care" factor. ;)

Here you go, Bobby. Turns out Lee doesn't care about the definition of hearsay after all.

Makes sense he'd be agnostic on the issue of globalist cabals of pedos vaxxing our kiddies and taking away our Freeeeeedom, no?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:15pm:

Turns out Lee doesn't care about the definition of hearsay after all.

And lying is your sole forte. ::)

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 3:28pm:

Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍

Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for?

Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes?

This is what winning looks like, ja?

Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low.

Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee?

Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care?

Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule.

LOCK HIM UP !!!

lee wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:39pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:15pm: Turns out Lee doesn't care about the definition of hearsay after all. And lying is your sole forte. ::)

Here you go, Aquascoot, Lee's already reclaiming the truth - that ever-malleable social construction you've been telling us all about, the Real Americans vibing with a bit of good old fashioned bullshitartistry.

Why must the left lie?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 3:34pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation Tell that to the parents of the 150 schoolgirls he slaughtered.

Donny has killed so few civilians. He is a protector  of schoolgirls.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!!

Meh donny gets plenty of action.
He doesn't need to rape.

You and gweggy however.
You are like men dying of thirst .
You can't stop thinking about your primitive desires and how much you want it, you need it, you crave it.

Meanwhile donny is swimming in a lake of cool refreshing water.
It's driving you insane.
You are both so so thirsty.
It's possessing you.

Normal men with a normal sex life could not give a flying F about another man's sex life.
They think anyone who rumenates on another man's exploits is a weirdo  :-[

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:59pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!! Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape.

Why does he do it then?

And why do you applaud his crimes?

Do you sexually abuse women too?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:53pm:

Here you go, Aquascoot, Lee's already reclaiming the truth - that ever-malleable social construction you've been telling us all about, the Real Americans vibing with a bit of good old fashioned bullshitartistry.

Oh so now you know all about the Real Americans. ;D ;D ;D ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 7:06pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:59pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!! Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape. Why does he do it then? And why do you applaud his crimes? Do you sexually abuse women too?

Stop obsessing on other men's sex lives and try to get one of your own  :-[ :-[

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:59pm:

Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape. You and gweggy however. You are like men dying of thirst . You can't stop thinking about your primitive desires and how much you want it, you need it, you crave it. Meanwhile donny is swimming in a lake of cool refreshing water. It's driving you insane. You are both so so thirsty. It's possessing you. Normal men with a normal sex life could not give a flying F about another man's sex life. They think anyone who rumenates on another man's exploits is a weirdo  :-[/quote] Pecca is an ardent reader of tabloid newspapers. [quote author=bobbythebat1 link=1781242312/12#12 date=1781257139] Some page 3 girls for Pecca only: https://www.thesun.co.uk/fabulous/35166360/page-3-girls-ted-lasso-health-battle/

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 6:59pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!! Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape. You and gweggy however. You are like men dying of thirst . You can't stop thinking about your primitive desires and how much you want it, you need it, you crave it. Meanwhile donny is swimming in a lake of cool refreshing water. It's driving you insane. You are both so so thirsty. It's possessing you. Normal men with a normal sex life could not give a flying F about another man's sex life. They think anyone who rumenates on another man's exploits is a weirdo  :-[/quote] Moi? Come come. When have you ever heard the likes of us twisting, contorting and rumenating like this? [quote author=leeforward link=1781150225/45#45 date=1781337610]Adjudicated -     To make a decision (in a legal case or proceeding), as where a judge or arbitrator rules on some disputed issue or claim between the parties. There was no ruling from the judge. He made a comment, after the rulings were given. ::) There was no evidence led to alleged rape, therefore he didn't have any dispute to rule on. ::)

We're all men of the world here. Live and let live, dear.

Your DL can hardly be blamed for raping a few 13 year olds.

They were different times, no?

It was the early 2000s.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 7:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 7:06pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:59pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!! Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape. Why does he do it then? And why do you applaud his crimes? Do you sexually abuse women too? Stop obsessing on other men's sex lives ...

Rape is an act of violence.

Anyone who would consider it part of someone's sex life is a sick puppy indeed.

Why do you applaud his violent crimes?

Do you sexually abuse women too?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 16^th, 2026 at 7:52pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 7:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 7:06pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:59pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 6:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 16th, 2026 at 3:28pm: Meh. Trump has successfully flooded the zone. MMA at the white house. So much novelty So stimulating People love novelty and stimulation He can do what he likes. Whining sookies like big donger and gweg can't touch him. They are neither novel nor stimulating They are boring and repetitive They should just admit he has out manoeuvred them for a decade. This is what winning looks like 👍 Oh? So why's Lee acting all legalistic about terms he has the "don't care" factor for? Why doesn't he just concede the big fella can rape who he likes? This is what winning looks like, ja? Look, something tells me Lee's playing a longer game here, dear. When Newscum runs in 2028, Lee'll want to go high, not low. Lee's not going to be too comfy pretending they're all as bad as each other, oh no. You and Bobby might be okay defending a big-swinging rapist, but Lee? Heaven forbid. He plans to clutch his pearls and shriek the house down. He'll be lining up Newscum's rape victims like we've never seen before. The definition of hearsay will be forgotten forever more, with the "don't care" factor reversed. Don't care? Good God, Newscum's victims have feelings too, he'll scream. For heaven's sake, the man's intelligible to run, never mind rule. LOCK HIM UP !!! Meh donny gets plenty of action. He doesn't need to rape. Why does he do it then? And why do you applaud his crimes? Do you sexually abuse women too? Stop obsessing on other men's sex lives ... Rape is an act of violence. Anyone who would consider it part of someone's sex life is a sick puppy indeed. Why do you applaud his violent crimes? Do you sexually abuse women too?

Better answer him, Aquascoot. When it's time to go after Newscum, Lee's going to need all the help he can get, dear. When they go low, we go high, no?

Let's face it, all penetration is rape. We need to hear our sisters in the struggle here.

I'm sure Mrs Scoot has the odd bone to pick, ja?