ABC 24 - news -

First polling booth - first count -

One Nation up by 42%.   :o

Please explain.

A question without notice.   Let’s assume ON win Farrer.  Can ON force/convince their man to give the seat to Barnaby Joyce? I am not sure if that can be done, but if it can, I would hate to be the winner!   Barnaby will be at the door demanding the seat.  ON needs a seat in the lower house to build on and this guy is a relative unknown to most of us The Beetrooter on the other hand……

Is their candidate - David Farley - a rapist or convicted sex offender?

I only ask because I know Pauline and the Beetrooter have a fondness for rapists.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 7:57pm:

Is their candidate - David Farley - a rapist or convicted sex offender? I only ask because I know Pauline and the Beetrooter have a fondness for rapists.

Not sure about that, but the lovely James Ashby allegedly likes old men’s freckles to “slipper” in to

greggerypeccary wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 7:57pm:

Is their candidate - David Farley - a rapist or convicted sex offender? I only ask because I know Pauline and the Beetrooter have a fondness for rapists.

You despicable, disgusting creep. Not in dispute.

ABC  projection -  David Farley - One Nation to win.    :)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-05-09/farrer-sat-night-results/106656856


One Nation scores historic win in Farrer by-election

By Bruce MacKenzie

ABC Riverina

Topic:By-Elections

26m ago



One Nation has scored a thumping win in the Farrer by-election, marking the first time the party has won a Lower House seat in the federal parliament.

The ABC's election analyst Casey Briggs called the seat for One Nation just after 8:00pm.

At that stage One Nation candidate David Farley had more than 40 per cent of the primary vote and was predicted to win the seat with a margin of about nine per cent after preferences.

He will become the first member for Farrer who does not represent either the Liberal Party or the National Party.

Mr Farley said he chose to join One Nation because it was "a political party of courage and tenacity".

"I wanted to match that to what my skills were … in agriculture, agribusiness and community, and I could see the job that was required," he said.

"So I look at it and I understand what is the job in Farrer, what's got to be required and how to deliver it, and that message plus our policies has resonated very well right across the whole depth and breadth of Farrer.

"People just want change, it's as simple as that."
One Nation Leader Pauline Hanson has appeared on Sky News where she thanked the voters who delivered a thumping victory for her party.

"They realised that we are the last hope of changing things in this country, to get it back to the country that we used to be," she said.

"People have fear for the future generations, no hope of owning their own home, you know?

"And the cost of living is just destroying families."

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/one-nation-wins-farrer-in-blow-to-major-parties/news-story/b4e8eb49c6ed218cc98f2987d8ac4d85
I had hoped for a better result for the independent.

A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos.

Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::)

Bobby. wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 9:55pm:

A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::)

... and may they prosper mightily at doing so!!

The People are demandng real change for a change... - the times they are a-changing.

Watch Albo this coming week .... I haven't voted for a party for years now due to their failings - now I'm waiting on real results...

An interesting comment from Murray Watt:

"After knifing their first ever female leader in Sussan Ley, voters in
her old seat have sent a clear message to Angus Taylor.

That under him, the Liberals are no better. The Liberal Party has held Farrer for around 60 of the 86 years that the
seat has existed.

Tonight they look like finishing a distant third, or even fourth. Even worse, by directing preferences to One Nation, they have delivered this extreme, chaotic party its first ever win for a lower house
seat.
And already the three parties are openly discussing forming a new
right-wing coalition to try and win the next election."

That the Libs would actually assist PHON get a seat must really grate on it’s grass roots voters.   After this, they have lost the right to criticise Pauline Hanson or ON as they are bedbuddies now

What will be interesting is if Abbott gets control of the Party as National President, noting his “love” of Hanson

Bobby. wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 9:55pm:

A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::)

It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate,

more a wake up call for Libs/Nats.

Redmond Neck wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 8:48am:

Bobby. wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 9:55pm: A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::) It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate, more a wake up call for Libs/Nats.

Sure - and Angus Taylor left it too late to change his policies.

Frank wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 8:10pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 7:57pm: Is their candidate - David Farley - a rapist or convicted sex offender? I only ask because I know Pauline and the Beetrooter have a fondness for rapists. You despicable, disgusting creep. Not in dispute.

Is that a yes, or a no?

Hanson and Joyce openly defended a rapist. Not in dispute.

"One Nation leader Pauline Hanson and MP Barnaby Joyce have defended their party’s decision to rehire a convicted rapist who had served his time in prison.

"On Sunday, Hanson announced the sacking of Sean Black, a staffer who had been rehired by the resurgent minor party after he went to jail in 2018 for raping and violently assaulting a woman."

Redmond Neck wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 8:48am:

Bobby. wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 9:55pm: A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::) It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate, more a wake up call for Libs/Nats.

True, but an absolute indictment on the Libs for preferencing PHON ahead of an Independent.   Surely an Independent winning the seat
would be far less bother than PHON.   Angus is on the way out after this.  Thank the Aussie taxpayer he has all that money from water buybacks to keep him going

Vic wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:13am:

Redmond Neck wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 8:48am: Bobby. wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 9:55pm: A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::) It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate, more a wake up call for Libs/Nats. True, but an absolute indictment on the Libs for preferencing PHON ahead of an Independent.   Surely an Independent winning the seat would be far less bother than PHON.   Angus is on the way out after this.  Thank the Aussie taxpayer he has all that money from water buybacks to keep him going

Why didn't Angus Taylor clearly state a new Liberal policy on immigration before the election?

He dropped the ball.

( or he was never serious about a new immigration policy? )

Well, One Nation looks like becoming a bigger influence than The Democrats were back in the day.

Remember them? "Keep the bastards honest." ?  ;D

It is very interesting that Labor luvvies are rejoicing about the way One Nation has decimated the Libs ...

We haven't seen them take on a Lower House seat where Labor is running a candidate yet.

It could be a very rude shock for Labor too.

Watch this space.  ;)

Labor Luvvies?   Wow - sour grapes withering on the vine!

Why would any party go to the expense of fielding a candidate in the safe seat of another party?   All parties do it and rightly so.

I certainly am not rejoicing about PHON decimating the Liberals - but then again, the Liberals preferenced her, what did they think would happen?  Talk about hoisted by your own petard.   If I were a Liberal Voter I would be absolutely outraged that my own party would give votes to a rascist, redneck and corrupt party such as PHON over a well liked, popular Independant who would be less of a threat than PHON will be

I hold no truck for ANY political party these days.  My local MP is Zoe McKenzie - a Liberal who has outshone the deadbeats before her with style.  she will get my vote anyday.  My vote will always go to the person whom I think is best for myself and my Family.   

Sign of times to come

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/923/xxsKwH.jpg

tallowood wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:50am:

Sign of times to come https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/923/xxsKwH.jpg

I wonder how much pressure this bloke will come under to give up the seat for Joyce.   I am not sure if that can be done, but if it can, this Bloke is going to be in for some heavy persuasion to hand it over

Vic wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:49am:

Labor Luvvies?   Wow - sour grapes withering on the vine! Why would any party go to the expense of fielding a candidate in the safe seat of another party?   All parties do it and rightly so. I certainly am not rejoicing about PHON decimating the Liberals - but then again, the Liberals preferenced her, what did they think would happen?  Talk about hoisted by your own petard.   If I were a Liberal Voter I would be absolutely outraged that my own party would give votes to a rascist, redneck and corrupt party such as PHON over a well liked, popular Independant who would be less of a threat than PHON will be I hold no truck for ANY political party these days.  My local MP is Zoe McKenzie - a Liberal who has outshone the deadbeats before her with style.  she will get my vote anyday.  My vote will always go to the person whom I think is best for myself and my Family.

I think the Libs' view is that they want to hurt Labor in any way they can, (but this byelection was a dead duck as far as the Libs go this time.) So preferencing ON above anyone else will be a common thing as time goes by.

I reckon the Libs will preference One Nation wherever there is a chance to get rid of a Labor seat.

Perhaps there will be a tri-party loose coalition between the Nats; Libs and One Nation down the track.

Perhaps optional preferential voting will get a run?

I could see Labor wanting to bring that in if things keep going this way for One Nation.  :o


Oh, and by "Labor Luvvies" I was referring to Labor Luvvies in general, not you in particular.

I was a Labor Luvvy from 1972 onwards until Bill Shorten came along. (Although I did once vote a "protest vote" putting Labor second preference one time back in the Bob Hawke days.)

I was a member of the Labor Party, a campaign helper and Labor scrutineer at one time.  Also, a union rep. :o

I will be voting One Nation next time just for a laugh.

Captain Nemo wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 11:20am:

Vic wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 10:49am: Labor Luvvies?   Wow - sour grapes withering on the vine! Why would any party go to the expense of fielding a candidate in the safe seat of another party?   All parties do it and rightly so. I certainly am not rejoicing about PHON decimating the Liberals - but then again, the Liberals preferenced her, what did they think would happen?  Talk about hoisted by your own petard.   If I were a Liberal Voter I would be absolutely outraged that my own party would give votes to a rascist, redneck and corrupt party such as PHON over a well liked, popular Independant who would be less of a threat than PHON will be I hold no truck for ANY political party these days.  My local MP is Zoe McKenzie - a Liberal who has outshone the deadbeats before her with style.  she will get my vote anyday.  My vote will always go to the person whom I think is best for myself and my Family.    I think the Libs' view is that they want to hurt Labor in any way they can, (but this byelection was a dead duck as far as the Libs go this time.) So preferencing ON above anyone else will be a common thing as time goes by. I reckon the Libs will preference One Nation wherever there is a chance to get rid of a Labor seat. Perhaps there will be a tri-party loose coalition between the Nats; Libs and One Nation down the track. Perhaps optional preferential voting will get a run? I could see Labor wanting to bring that in if things keep going this way for One Nation.  :o Oh, and by "Labor Luvvies" I was referring to Labor Luvvies in general, not you in particular. I was a Labor Luvvy from 1972 onwards until Bill Shorten came along. (Although I did once vote a "protest vote" putting Labor second preference one time back in the Bob Hawke days.) I will be voting One Nation next time just for a laugh.

I just wish more voters would realise that preferences belong to them, not the parties/candidates.

How-to-vote cards are merely suggestions.

Vic wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:53am:

tallowood wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 10:50am: Sign of times to come https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/923/xxsKwH.jpg I wonder how much pressure this bloke will come under to give up the seat for Joyce.   I am not sure if that can be done, but if it can, this Bloke is going to be in for some heavy persuasion to hand it over

I guess the victory was due to the party policy rather then his personality but we'll see when and if it comes to the loot distribution moment.

https://miro.medium.com/v2/0*ozWRHxbqNABWFdot.png

Bobby. wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:17am:

Vic wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 10:13am: Redmond Neck wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 8:48am: Bobby. wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 9:55pm: A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::) It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate, more a wake up call for Libs/Nats. True, but an absolute indictment on the Libs for preferencing PHON ahead of an Independent.   Surely an Independent winning the seat would be far less bother than PHON.   Angus is on the way out after this.  Thank the Aussie taxpayer he has all that money from water buybacks to keep him going Why didn't Angus Taylor clearly state a new Liberal policy on immigration before the election? He dropped the ball. ( or he was never serious about a new immigration policy? )

Nobody believes the Libs any more.

Frank wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 12:17pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 10:17am: Vic wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 10:13am: Redmond Neck wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 8:48am: Bobby. wrote on May 9th, 2026 at 9:55pm: A good wake up call for Labor and Libbos. Pity they won't listen till they start losing elections.   ::) It was never a Labor seat, they didnt even run a candidate, more a wake up call for Libs/Nats. True, but an absolute indictment on the Libs for preferencing PHON ahead of an Independent.   Surely an Independent winning the seat would be far less bother than PHON.   Angus is on the way out after this.  Thank the Aussie taxpayer he has all that money from water buybacks to keep him going Why didn't Angus Taylor clearly state a new Liberal policy on immigration before the election? He dropped the ball. ( or he was never serious about a new immigration policy? ) Nobody believes the Libs any more.

Angus appears to be disingenuous.

There is something about Liberal policy that he is not telling us.



Posted on 22 July 2021 by David Evans      


https://wentworthreport.com/2021/07/22/australian-immigration-policy/

The Wentworth Report


https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=700,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/118/007/329/original/891aaddc57fc1a79.jpg



Semi-official admission by anti-democratic elite —
we never voted for high immigration:

    Back in 1994, launching a book of essays, former prime minister Bob Hawke made the remarkably frank admission that immigration policy had effectively been a conspiracy by the political establishment against the Australian public.


Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda”

We need immigration
but not mass uncontrolled immigration
of millions of people when there is
nowhere for them to live.

That's only one issue.
There is cost of living too.
Energy prices are skyrocketing along with food and groceries.

Captain Nemo wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 10:22am:

Well, One Nation looks like becoming a bigger influence than The Democrats were back in the day. Remember them? "Keep the bastards honest." ?  ;D It is very interesting that Labor luvvies are rejoicing about the way One Nation has decimated the Libs ... We haven't seen them take on a Lower House seat where Labor is running a candidate yet. It could be a very rude shock for Labor too. Watch this space.  ;)

Indeed, once Anika Wells repays her 10 k of stolen money the seat of Lilly will be very interesting at the next election.

The people of Brisbane aren’t stupid and I expect will be waiting for her at the ballot box with cricket bats.

It’s an interesting place full of hard working people.

They have voted liberal before  so definitely not a safe seat for labor given the lack of quality there currently  MP has displayed.


I sense big inroads in the seat of Lilly coming for one nation and the only blame for this is Labour minister Anika ( rorting) wells.

Shes been a complete failure / embarrassment  locally,nationally and globally.

What exactly is the difference between larceny and rorting?

Anika wells should be facing criminal charges and criminal court ?

Why can politicians like Anika wells steal and once caught it’s ok if she pays it back?

Try working in the real world and stealing 10k of your employer and you will be charged and convicted in court.

What exactly makes Anika ( criminal) Wells so above the charges of larceny and fraud?

Daves2017 wrote on May 9^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/one-nation-wins-farrer-in-blow-to-major-parties/news-story/b4e8eb49c6ed218cc98f2987d8ac4d85 I had hoped for a better result for the independent.

She is a supported by Simon says therefore a Teal.

Greens went backwards which might hurt labor in next election as they rely on Greens giving preferences to Labor.

Bobby. wrote on May 10^th, 2026 at 12:24pm:

Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda”

There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card.

Dnarever wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 10:56am:

Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 12:24pm: Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda” There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card.

Nonsense, duckwit.

Nobody wanrs illegal immigration. Nobody wants immigrants self-selecting for settlement whether the host country wants them or not.

Most people do not want even legal immigrant on the huge scale and cultural mix that is happening now here and in Europe.  Only an idiot still maintains that every culture is compatible with every other.

If you are not actively assimilating and integrating, you dhoul nt be here. That is not wacism.

Dnarever wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 10:56am:

Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 12:24pm: Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda” There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card.

No - I contend that both Labor and Liberal still have
a secret deal to welcome uncontrolled mass immigration of millions of people
when they know there is nowhere for them to live,
and they don't care about young Australians who will never be able to afford a home -
no matter how good a job they get.

https://media.gab.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=700,quality=100,fit=scale-down/system/media_attachments/files/118/007/329/original/891aaddc57fc1a79.jpg

Bobby. wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 11:54am:

Dnarever wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 10:56am: Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 12:24pm: Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda” There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card. No - I contend that both Labor and Liberal still have a secret deal to welcome uncontrolled mass immigration of millions of people when they know there is nowhere for them to live, and they don't care about young Australians who will never be able to afford a home - no matter how good a job they get.

Labor cares about young people's votes, so I am pedicting that they will force investors to divest of their investment properties and make them available to prospective home owners, thus gaining favour with younger voters. They know they can't fix the housing issue with new supply so they don't care about the boomers' vote as they know they will probably vote No Nation to protect their nest eggs.

Sir lastnail wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 12:05pm:

Labor cares about young people's votes, so I am predicting that they will force investors to divest of their investment properties and make them available to prospective home owners, thus gaining favour with younger voters. They know they can't fix the housing issue with new supply so they don't care about the boomers' vote as they know they will probably vote No Nation to protect their nest eggs.

That will only be a drop in the ocean.
I would say that 95% of young people will never own a home.

Angus Taylor needs to come clean with the electors -
he needs to confess about the secret deal to welcome millions
of immigrants from 3rd world crap hole countries which
has destroyed the fabric of our society.

He needs to repent in public - he needs to name names -
who was involved in the secret deals that usurped our democracy?

‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win


May 11, 2026

Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg

Sir lastnail wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 12:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 11:54am: Dnarever wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 10:56am: Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 12:24pm: Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda” There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card. No - I contend that both Labor and Liberal still have a secret deal to welcome uncontrolled mass immigration of millions of people when they know there is nowhere for them to live, and they don't care about young Australians who will never be able to afford a home - no matter how good a job they get. Labor cares about young people's votes, so I am pedicting that they will force investors to divest of their investment properties and make them available to prospective home owners, thus gaining favour with younger voters. They know they can't fix the housing issue with new supply so they don't care about the boomers' vote as they know they will probably vote No Nation to protect their nest eggs.

If you look at the trends, ON got the largest % of vote from 45 - 55 year old.  Hardly Boomers.     Most Boomers I know don't have investment properties - they are either on super or the pension.  Thos that do are retired and either earn a low part time wage or what they have coming in is below the tax threshhold for any meaningful advantage from NG.    Be very careful what you wish for with negative gearing - you may find a swag of very expensive houses hitting the streets that will still be too expensive for 1st home owners.      There still has to be an incentive for Landlords to own an investment property and rent it out with the expenses that naturally will occur.

Bobby. wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 3:33pm:

‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg

Barnaby is always good value.

Vic wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 6:04pm:

Sir lastnail wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 12:05pm: Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 11:54am: Dnarever wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 10:56am: Bobby. wrote on May 10th, 2026 at 12:24pm: Hawke agreed with one author’s observation that most voters wanted immigration reduced and that the parties had deliberately kept it out of public debate, saying there had indeed been “an implicit pact between the major parties to implement broad policies on immigration that they know are not generally endorsed by the electorate” and that “they have done this by keeping the subject off the political agenda” There was a short period where both political parties agreed to take racism off the table. John Howards government put it back on. One of the Howard governments big advantage was the way that they played the race card. No - I contend that both Labor and Liberal still have a secret deal to welcome uncontrolled mass immigration of millions of people when they know there is nowhere for them to live, and they don't care about young Australians who will never be able to afford a home - no matter how good a job they get. Labor cares about young people's votes, so I am pedicting that they will force investors to divest of their investment properties and make them available to prospective home owners, thus gaining favour with younger voters. They know they can't fix the housing issue with new supply so they don't care about the boomers' vote as they know they will probably vote No Nation to protect their nest eggs. If you look at the trends, ON got the largest % of vote from 45 - 55 year old.  Hardly Boomers.     Most Boomers I know don't have investment properties - they are either on super or the pension.  Thos that do are retired and either earn a low part time wage or what they have coming in is below the tax threshhold for any meaningful advantage from NG.    Be very careful what you wish for with negative gearing - you may find a swag of very expensive houses hitting the streets that will still be too expensive for 1st home owners.      There still has to be an incentive for Landlords to own an investment property and rent it out with the expenses that naturally will occur.

Then keep these tax incentives for brand new properties only. This will give an incentive for investors to add to the supply rather than competing with owner occupiers on existing supply. What's the problem ? It should be a no-brainer ;)

Frank wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 6:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm: ‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg Barnaby is always good value.

The problem is None-Nation only has half a policy, and that is to bash the wogs.

Frank wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 6:22pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm: ‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg Barnaby is always good value.

Barnaby is always no value.

The Kiwi citizen illegitimately in Australia's parliament ?

The guy who likes to root women he isn't married to almost as much as his sheep ?

Sir lastnail wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 7:16pm:

Frank wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 6:22pm: Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm: ‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg Barnaby is always good value. The problem is None-Nation only has half a policy, and that is to bash the wogs.

You are stupid. That's your policy.  Keep it up.

We need to hear what the stupid people make of the world.

Dnarever wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 7:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 6:22pm: Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm: ‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg Barnaby is always good value. Barnaby is always no value. The Kiwi citizen illegitimately in Australia's parliament ? The guy who likes to root women he isn't married to almost as much as his sheep ?

You are stupid. That's your policy.  Keep it up.

We need to hear what the stupid people make of the world.

Dnarever wrote on May 11^th, 2026 at 7:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 6:22pm: Bobby. wrote on May 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm: ‘Meltdown’ | Barnaby Joyce on ABC’s reaction to One Nation win May 11, 2026 Barnaby Joyce spoke with Ben and didn’t hold back on the ABC’s response to One Nation’s big win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgKr7qLELXg Barnaby is always good value. Barnaby is always no value. The Kiwi citizen illegitimately in Australia's parliament ? The guy who likes to root women he isn't married to almost as much as his sheep ?

You idiot -
Barny was born in Australia -
his father was a Kiwi.    ::)