| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1777241707 Message started by Armchair_Politician on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am |
|
|
Title: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Armchair_Politician on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am
Someone made a comment on social media not long after the shooting that they suspect it was a set up to give Trump a reason to push ahead with his ballroom. Sure enough, some hours later we see Trump saying that if his ballroom were built with all its top secret (his words not mine) stuff, the shooting would’ve never happened.
|
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Armchair_Politician on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:17am |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 27th, 2026 at 9:49am Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am:
Yes, I saw that: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1777166325/32#32 Anything is possible with this corrupt administration. I don't believe a word they say. And while we're at it, do you see the look on the rapist's face before the shooting started - when the guy was showing him a card or piece of paper? It looked like grandad had absolutely no idea where he was or what was going on. And then when they tried to usher him out he fell to the floor and couldn't get up. Melania had better start calling some nursing homes. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Armchair_Politician on Apr 27th, 2026 at 12:24pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 9:49am:
Yep, they had Vance out well before Trump. It is usually the other way around! |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Dnarever on Apr 27th, 2026 at 4:34pm
Don't know but it couldn't be too hard for someone to hit the bloated bouncy illuminated Incandescent Orange beach ball.
|
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Baronvonrort on Apr 27th, 2026 at 11:54pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am:
Those with TDS are turning into wacko conspiracy theorists. Did Trump use a Jedi mind trick to convince a democrat to throw his life away with a piss poor effort to shoot republicans? ;D ;D ;D :D :D :D ;D ;D ;D Having worked in security worst case is public settings like that hotel where anyone can come in and setup above or around you. Security at Trumps new ballroom would be excellent it's on white house premises which already has good security they can control everyone who comes in. There would be no spaces for anyone to hide it could even have secret passages to escape. They could make it blast resistant for bombs and drones bullet proof glass even have observation posts for security. Far easier to make it secure for heads of state visits and functions over a hotel that still lets others in. Secret service would have 100% control of everyone entering ballroom with multiple layers of defence to stop unauthorised people. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Marla on Apr 28th, 2026 at 12:21am Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 11:54pm:
Oh, and you never worked a day in your miserable life, you government-paid parasite. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by aquascoot on Apr 28th, 2026 at 6:44am Marla wrote on Apr 28th, 2026 at 12:21am:
Hang on, the DMV pay your wage. Lefties say MAGA are into conspiracy theories ;D ;D. Didn't a secret service agent get hit :( :( |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by MeisterEckhart on Apr 28th, 2026 at 6:45am Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 11:54pm:
Yes, how are would-be assassins incentivised by security services to make their attempts? |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Dnarever on Apr 28th, 2026 at 10:10am
It was just another idiot trying to make America great again.
|
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Armchair_Politician on Apr 28th, 2026 at 11:57am MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2026 at 6:45am:
Trump convinced his followers to storm the Capitol to overturn the Biden win. Is this really that much of a stretch? |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Frank on Apr 28th, 2026 at 3:07pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am:
Someone, eh!? Wacko Smacko. And you lapping it eagerly. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Frank on Apr 29th, 2026 at 9:20am
A famous line of Ian Fleming's seems more germane:
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. The third time it's enemy action. Which begs the question: if it's enemy action, who precisely is the enemy? Let's cut to the chase - the US Secret Service: In on it? Or just totally crap? I don't think it's possible to be this rubbish this often. If the object of a thing is, as they say, its outcome, then the object of the United States Secret Service these last two years is to enable the increasing number of Trump-deranged persons to take a potshot at him. But, even if you incline to cock-up rather than conspiracy, their dysfunction is unreformable. Steyn |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by MeisterEckhart on Apr 29th, 2026 at 9:47am
Organising a Kennedy-Oswald-style assassination conspiracy, which has long been levelled at the CIA, is probably highly unlikely today.
What is far more likely is a conspiracy to passively allow would-be assassins to proceed with their plan, at least right up to the penultimate moment... The latest would-be assassin, himself, noted that security appeared light, almost breezy, which does have shades of Kennedy's Secret Service agents' attitude on that day. This would-be assassin appears to have left a trail a mile wide about his intentions, apparently plastered it all over social media, and checked into the hotel... But no security apparatus marked him as suspicious? Seems extremely unlikely, unless the stories we hear about modern deep surveillance of US citizens are exaggerated or false. SO, what's going on within the Secret Service? The CIA? Systemic incompetence? Or.....? |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Frank on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:58pm
The basic facts of Butler should chill the blood:
In the last seventy-two hours, we have learned there were at least three government snipers in the very building whose rooftop the assassin was trying to access. They sat inside and watched him through the windows, as he arrived and peered up at the roof, and then wandered away. They watched him when he came back and took out a laser range-finder to calculate the distance between the building and Trump's head, and then left again. They watched him a third time when he returned with a bulky backpack. They watched him for the best part of half-an-hour ...and then they let him go ahead and shoot the Republican presidential candidate. Yet here's the kicker: Almost two years later, they're all still working for the federal government. Let's cut to the chase - the US Secret Service: In on it? Or just totally crap? I don't think it's possible to be this rubbish this often. If the object of a thing is, as they say, its outcome, then the object of the United States Secret Service these last two years is to enable the increasing number of Trump-deranged persons to take a potshot at him. But, even if you incline to cock-up rather than conspiracy, their dysfunction is unreformable. [url=https://www.steynonline.com/16171/the-secret-service-makes-me-nervous]UPDATE! "Known wolves" aren't just for Islam anymore: a relative called in the name of the shooter before the dinner but the lethargic bureaucracy could not rouse itself to act even though he was registered at the Hilton under his real name[/url].] |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by greggerypeccary on Apr 29th, 2026 at 6:02pm Frank wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 5:58pm:
Facts? The word you're looking for is 'allegations', old boy. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Dnarever on Apr 29th, 2026 at 6:05pm Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 8:15am:
Quote:
No the ballroom was a stupid comment by Trump. The thing is that the media event is for 2,000 people. The ballroom doesn't even fit 1,000. It is just dumbo being dumb as usual. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Frank on Apr 29th, 2026 at 8:52pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 6:02pm:
Yes, slanderous, lying, despicable creep, facts. Not allegations, facts. |
|
Title: Re: Is the WH Correspondents shooting a set up? Post by Dnarever on Apr 29th, 2026 at 10:03pm greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 29th, 2026 at 6:02pm:
It seems that so many on the right believe that facts are defined as what they would prefer to be true. Different perspective you see. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |