Explosive report claims that Trump tried to ‘use the nuclear codes’ during stormy Iran war meeting

An explosive but unconfirmed report claims that President Donald Trump tried to “use the nuclear codes” during a stormy meeting on the Iran war on Saturday but was stopped by the highest-ranking member of the U.S. military.

The report originated from an appearance by CIA officer Larry Johnson on “Judging Freedom,” a podcast and YouTube talk show hosted by former Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano.

But the report is now being parsed by U.S. news outlets, including Newsweek and MSN.

Newsweek reported that Johnson provided no evidence for his claim, did not identify any sources for his account and did not clarify what he meant by “nuclear codes.”

Newsweek said that it has “found no independent corroboration for the claim.”

During the April 20 episode of the podcast, Johnson claimed that an emergency White House meeting took place on Saturday night amid escalating tensions with Iran.

“One report coming out of that meeting at the White House is that Trump wanted to use the nuclear, so‑called, use the nuclear codes, and General Dan Caine stood up and said ‘no,’" Johnson said.

Johnson described the exchange as “apparently quite a blowup.”

As the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Caine is the highest-ranking member of the U.S. military.

Newsweek said that Johnson “did not name his source, explain how the information was obtained, or provide any details about what actions Trump was alleged to have taken.”

Johnson in addition “did not clarify whether he was referring to a nuclear strike, a briefing, or any formal command process,” the outlet reported.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/explosive-report-claims-trump-tried-152804924.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMbONjYR0vhXCZ2dsExVpDdpWZ0uqEugXVqpbQkNkneP2KsbeP_n37rX6_Pvzx2tUSBSNzKZecgzEEfnAE_qNwOTcqrv_RuseOpyEuBFxScd0PnprFyMDDS9HXqVzD3UMl3x2K8QuZ_jQwkxBfuoQut2Og98clFjliFr5BXp_vGR

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/insight/general-reportedly-blocked-trump-from-using-nuclear-codes/gm-GMLEFEF1A2?gemSnapshotKey=GMLEFEF1A2-snapshot-7

25th Amendment

Grow a spine, JD.

Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone.

How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation.

Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 9:57am:

Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons

Well, the rapist in the White House obviously did   ;D

Nobody has ever accused the convicted felon of being intelligent.

Nice own goal.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 9:57am:

Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons

When your DL uses the nuclear codes to END CIVILISATION TONIGHT, what will you say?

a) How awful. I do hope they impeach his arse.

b) Shit happens. Shurely shome mishtake.

c) We'll win so much we'll grow tired of winning, no?

d) Yes, Master.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 9:57am:

Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons

I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine.

The President does not have any nuclear codes.

He has to give the OK for a nuclear strike but if
he can't be contacted and the USA is under attack then
someone else can give the OK.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 9:05am:

Explosive report claims that Trump tried to ‘use the nuclear codes’ during stormy Iran war meeting An explosive but unconfirmed report claims that President Donald Trump tried to “use the nuclear codes” during a stormy meeting on the Iran war on Saturday but was stopped by the highest-ranking member of the U.S. military. The report originated from an appearance by CIA officer Larry Johnson on “Judging Freedom,” a podcast and YouTube talk show hosted by former Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano. But the report is now being parsed by U.S. news outlets, including Newsweek and MSN. Newsweek reported that Johnson provided no evidence for his claim, did not identify any sources for his account and did not clarify what he meant by “nuclear codes.” Newsweek said that it has “found no independent corroboration for the claim.” During the April 20 episode of the podcast, Johnson claimed that an emergency White House meeting took place on Saturday night amid escalating tensions with Iran. “One report coming out of that meeting at the White House is that Trump wanted to use the nuclear, so‑called, use the nuclear codes, and General Dan Caine stood up and said ‘no,’" Johnson said. Johnson described the exchange as “apparently quite a blowup.” As the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Caine is the highest-ranking member of the U.S. military. Newsweek said that Johnson “did not name his source, explain how the information was obtained, or provide any details about what actions Trump was alleged to have taken.” Johnson in addition “did not clarify whether he was referring to a nuclear strike, a briefing, or any formal command process,” the outlet reported. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/explosive-report-claims-trump-tried-152804924.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMbONjYR0vhXCZ2dsExVpDdpWZ0uqEugXVqpbQkNkneP2KsbeP_n37rX6_Pvzx2tUSBSNzKZecgzEEfnAE_qNwOTcqrv_RuseOpyEuBFxScd0PnprFyMDDS9HXqVzD3UMl3x2K8QuZ_jQwkxBfuoQut2Og98clFjliFr5BXp_vGR https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/insight/general-reportedly-blocked-trump-from-using-nuclear-codes/gm-GMLEFEF1A2?gemSnapshotKey=GMLEFEF1A2-snapshot-7

Sorry, Armchair, there's one problem with your cunning scenario.

Saturday night's party night at Mar a Lago. DL always plays DL, selecting the songs on his phone.

He would have had to put his phone down, go to Mar a Lago's top secret area (behind the black curtain next to the pool), log into his top secret laptop and yell at General Caine. Can you imagine?

No one would be playing DJ. The dance floor would be totally dead.

I'm sorry, Armchair, I really don't see that happening.

You?

Bobby. wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 10:35am:

The President does not have any nuclear codes. He has to give the OK for a nuclear strike but if he can't be contacted and the USA is under attack then someone else can give the OK.

Nonsense. DL's valet Walt has to carry the nuclear codes around in a briefcase - one more thing to manage, on top of dressing DL, looking after his makeup bag, getting him his Diet Cokes, etc.

It was a lot easier when DL was out of office, that's for sure. Then, Walt just had to look after his boxes - not to mention Melania's panty drawers.

RIGGED WITCH HUNT !!!

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 10:25am:

Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine.

I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 9:05am:

An explosive but unconfirmed report claims that

You too, pal, cut back on the TDS uppers.

Frank wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 11:38am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:05am: An explosive but unconfirmed report claims that You too, pal, cut back on the TDS uppers.

Codes are generated, no one carries the codes around, everyone knows that, well except podcasters and TDS sufferers.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 11:36am:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact.

So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh?

Trump does not need codes to create nuclear butthurt in TDS crowd bums  ;D

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 12:10pm:

Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh?

No it's because generals don't walk around with nuclear codes, except in movies and there is no single code for armament of nuclear weapons, except again in movies.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 2:12pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 12:10pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh? No it's because generals don't walk around with nuclear codes, except in movies and there is no single code for armament of nuclear weapons, except again in movies.

Nobody said they did.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 12:10pm:

Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh?

"Fact Check: The Truth Behind the Viral Claim That General Dan Caine 'Blocked' Trump's Nuclear Codes
Fact-checkers found no matching reports, yet the viral clip is already moving oil markets and shaking Pentagon trust"

https://www.ibtimes.com/fact-check-truth-behind-viral-claim-that-general-dan-caine-blocked-trumps-nuclear-codes-3801579

"Major outlets and fact‑checking sites have searched for independent confirmation and found none; reporters note there are no credible, verified reports or official statements backing Johnson’s account and that the Pentagon’s publicly confirmed briefings did not include such an emergency meeting about nuclear authorization"

https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/evidence-larry-johnson-claim-trump-nuclear-codes-iran-8d193a

So no evidence, but you cloiasm it to be true. ::)

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 2:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 12:10pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh? "Fact Check: The Truth Behind the Viral Claim That General Dan Caine 'Blocked' Trump's Nuclear Codes Fact-checkers found no matching reports, yet the viral clip is already moving oil markets and shaking Pentagon trust" https://www.ibtimes.com/fact-check-truth-behind-viral-claim-that-general-dan-caine-blocked-trumps-nuclear-codes-3801579 "Major outlets and fact‑checking sites have searched for independent confirmation and found none; reporters note there are no credible, verified reports or official statements backing Johnson’s account and that the Pentagon’s publicly confirmed briefings did not include such an emergency meeting about nuclear authorization" https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/evidence-larry-johnson-claim-trump-nuclear-codes-iran-8d193a So no evidence, but you claim it to be true. ::)

Has Trump denied it publicly?

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 2:45pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 12:10pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh? "Fact Check: The Truth Behind the Viral Claim That General Dan Caine 'Blocked' Trump's Nuclear Codes Fact-checkers found no matching reports, yet the viral clip is already moving oil markets and shaking Pentagon trust" https://www.ibtimes.com/fact-check-truth-behind-viral-claim-that-general-dan-caine-blocked-trumps-nuclear-codes-3801579 "Major outlets and fact‑checking sites have searched for independent confirmation and found none; reporters note there are no credible, verified reports or official statements backing Johnson’s account and that the Pentagon’s publicly confirmed briefings did not include such an emergency meeting about nuclear authorization" https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/evidence-larry-johnson-claim-trump-nuclear-codes-iran-8d193a So no evidence, but you cloiasm it to be true. ::)

Evidence:

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

Larry Johnson's testimony was supported by video evidence of Dan Caine storming out of the White House at the time referenced, with DL's staff disclosing they'd been berated for hours in a grueling tirade by DL which went on into the night.

Later that night, he posted:


Quote:

"We're offering a very fair and reasonable DEAL, and I hope they take it because, if they don't, the United States is going to knock out every single Power Plant, and every single Bridge, in Iran. NO MORE MR. NICE GUY!"

Far from having "no evidence", dear, I think we have all the evidence we need, don't you?

NO MORE MR NICE GUY !!!

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 3:05pm:

lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 2:45pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 12:10pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 11:36am: Armchair_Politician wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 9:57am: Armchair do you think that Trump could get the "nuclear codes" and what, put them into an app on his phone. How can intelligent people fall for this, I know that TDS sufferers will fall for it without hesitation. Does anyone think that simply getting the codes enables someone to arm nuclear weapons I think the point (that you clearly missed) is the fact that he even asked for them and he had to be refused by General Caine. I think the point you missed is you have taken a podcast as fact. So because it was raised on a podcast instead of the 6pm news bulletin, it can't possibly be true, eh? "Fact Check: The Truth Behind the Viral Claim That General Dan Caine 'Blocked' Trump's Nuclear Codes Fact-checkers found no matching reports, yet the viral clip is already moving oil markets and shaking Pentagon trust" https://www.ibtimes.com/fact-check-truth-behind-viral-claim-that-general-dan-caine-blocked-trumps-nuclear-codes-3801579 "Major outlets and fact‑checking sites have searched for independent confirmation and found none; reporters note there are no credible, verified reports or official statements backing Johnson’s account and that the Pentagon’s publicly confirmed briefings did not include such an emergency meeting about nuclear authorization" https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/evidence-larry-johnson-claim-trump-nuclear-codes-iran-8d193a So no evidence, but you claim it to be true. ::) Has Trump denied it publicly?

He most certainly has not.

Has Lee denied that he worships DL?

That's a question.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 3:24pm:

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::)

lee wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 4:15pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::)

Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up.

Not a concern.
Just get your 9th covid vax and you will be fine

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 4:18pm:

lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:15pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::) Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up.

There's no evidence for that, Leroy. Ask Lee.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 5:08pm:

Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:18pm: lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:15pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::) Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up. There's no evidence for that, Leroy. Ask Lee.

But there is evidence. Johnson declared two months before 9/11 that there was no risk to America from terrorists, then he also claimed that there was a video of Michelle Obama making racist remarks.

Johnson has no contacts in the CIA and if he has with his record of misinformation then its highly likely he is being fed false information for other purposes.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 5:41pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:08pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:18pm: lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:15pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::) Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up. There's no evidence for that, Leroy. Ask Lee. But there is evidence. Johnson declared two months before 9/11 that there was no risk to America from terrorists, then he also claimed that there was a video of Michelle Obama making racist remarks. Johnson has no contacts in the CIA and if he has with his record of misinformation then its highly likely he is being fed false information for other purposes.

Right, so provide your evidence.

Lee and I can have a squiz.

He's totally unbiased on this, you see.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 5:45pm:

Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:41pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:08pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:18pm: lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:15pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::) Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up. There's no evidence for that, Leroy. Ask Lee. But there is evidence. Johnson declared two months before 9/11 that there was no risk to America from terrorists, then he also claimed that there was a video of Michelle Obama making racist remarks. Johnson has no contacts in the CIA and if he has with his record of misinformation then its highly likely he is being fed false information for other purposes. Right, so provide your evidence. Lee and I can have a squiz. He's totally unbiased on this, you see.

This is your weakness, you don't gather all the information. I'm not your mother, find it yourself.

Leroy wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 5:55pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:45pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:41pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 5:08pm: Leroy wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:18pm: lee wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 4:15pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 3:24pm: On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military." So an ex-CIA officer was a witness? Or an ex-CIA officer heard about it? ::) Or an ex disgraced CIA disgruntled officer made it up. There's no evidence for that, Leroy. Ask Lee. But there is evidence. Johnson declared two months before 9/11 that there was no risk to America from terrorists, then he also claimed that there was a video of Michelle Obama making racist remarks. Johnson has no contacts in the CIA and if he has with his record of misinformation then its highly likely he is being fed false information for other purposes. Right, so provide your evidence. Lee and I can have a squiz. He's totally unbiased on this, you see. This is your weakness, you don't gather all the information. I'm not your mother, find it yourself.

What do you think, Lee?

Does Leroy's response meet your high evidentiary standards?

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22^nd, 2026 at 6:18pm:

Does Leroy's response meet your high evidentiary standards?

They meet yours, that is all you have to worry about. ;)

lee wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2026 at 3:11pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 22nd, 2026 at 6:18pm: Does Leroy's response meet your high evidentiary standards? They meet yours, that is all you have to worry about. ;)

Is it? So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source?

Quote me.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source?

You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;)

youtubes are not evidence. :)

lee wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2026 at 8:53pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :)

Source?

Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk

The interior minister of Pakistan, Mohsin Naqvi, held a meeting on Thursday with American Ambassador Natalie Baker to discuss attempts to continue negotiations to settle the war in Iran, expressing hope upon leaving the meeting that the rogue Iranian terror regime would return to the negotiating table.

Frank wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 9:12am:

Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk The interior minister of Pakistan, Mohsin Naqvi, held a meeting on Thursday with American Ambassador Natalie Baker to discuss attempts to continue negotiations to settle the war in Iran, expressing hope upon leaving the meeting that the rogue Iranian terror regime would return to the negotiating table.

The Pakis are in your good books now, I see. Praise DL!

Allah Uakbar, innit.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 23^rd, 2026 at 9:15pm:

lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source?

You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;)

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 9:45am:

Frank wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 9:12am: Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk The interior minister of Pakistan, Mohsin Naqvi, held a meeting on Thursday with American Ambassador Natalie Baker to discuss attempts to continue negotiations to settle the war in Iran, expressing hope upon leaving the meeting that the rogue Iranian terror regime would return to the negotiating table. The Pakis are in your good books now, I see. Praise DL! Allah Uakbar, innit.

Idiotic as usual, big dildo.

To the TDS 'mind' , the only korrekt stance is to instantly and unreservedly denounce and condemn anything and everything that happens under the Trump presidency.

Frank wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 5:33pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 9:45am: Frank wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 9:12am: Pakistan Praises Trump for Extending Ceasefire, Puts Pressure on Iran to Talk The interior minister of Pakistan, Mohsin Naqvi, held a meeting on Thursday with American Ambassador Natalie Baker to discuss attempts to continue negotiations to settle the war in Iran, expressing hope upon leaving the meeting that the rogue Iranian terror regime would return to the negotiating table. The Pakis are in your good books now, I see. Praise DL! Allah Uakbar, innit. Idiotic as usual, big dildo. To the TDS 'mind' , the only korrekt stance is to instantly and unreservedly denounce and condemn anything and everything that happens under the Trump presidency.

That would be the sensible thing to do, dear boy.

Remind us what the Pakis said about him ending some silly war with the Hindoos, will you?

Then remind us what India said.

Cheers.

lee wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 12:52pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 9:15pm: lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source? You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;)

Then you should have a source.

Quote me.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 7:48pm:

lee wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 9:15pm: lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source? You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;) Then you should have a source. Quote me.

That's my line, dildo.

Frank wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 8:33pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 7:48pm: lee wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 9:15pm: lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source? You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;) Then you should have a source. Quote me. That's my line, dildo.

No no, dear chap, your new line is dildo.

Aren't you saucy? You always get a little horny after a honeymoon. You're always like this a couple of weeks after returning from a ban, you naughty old thing.

To be honest, you're much nicer when you start a new sock. Most well behaved - a veritable goodie two-socks, aren't you? 

Why don't you try that?

You could use your lovely new line, no? Stick a statue of the Virgin Mary into your sig and off you go.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 10:00pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 8:33pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 7:48pm: lee wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 9:15pm: lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source? You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;) Then you should have a source. Quote me. That's my line, dildo. No no, dear chap, your new line is dildo. Aren't you saucy? You always get a little horny after a honeymoon. You're always like this a couple of weeks after returning from a ban, you naughty old thing. To be honest, you're much nicer when you start a new sock. Most well behaved - a veritable goodie two-socks, aren't you?  Why don't you try that? You could use your lovely new line, no? Stick a statue of the Virgin Mary into your sig and off you go.

That's enough polari and idiotic grimacing.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 24^th, 2026 at 7:48pm:

lee wrote on Apr 24th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 9:15pm: lee wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 8:53pm: Big Donger wrote on Apr 23rd, 2026 at 6:46pm: So when have you ever seen evidence tendered by moi without a reputable, fact-checked source? You should have stopped at "when have you seen evidence tendered by moi"? ;) youtubes are not evidence. :) Source? You are the one claiming using evidence and fact checkers. ;) Then you should have a source. Quote me.

And once again poor karny wants me to prove a negative. What a shambloic bot. ;D ;D ;D ;D