ICE Barbie Kristi Noem's husband is cross dresser who likes to pose for selfies with huge fake boobs


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15685877/kristi-noem-husband-bryon-crossdressing-pictures-south-dakota.html


Oh, my God, this is just too good.

Just another day in good ol' Christian MAGA world.

"dew yew wanna fukkk me"?


https://nypost.com/2026/03/31/us-news/kristi-noem-weighs-in-on-report-husband-bryon-lives-cross-dressing-double-life/

This will end in tragedy. Pass the popcorn.

That's hilarious    ;D

First she gets sacked, and now her husband embarrasses her on the world stage.

She deserves to have her life ruined.

Love it   :)

Daily Mail without paywall

https://archive.md/QJ3Qv

Also, who leaked this? Trump? Miller?

https://x.com/nothoodlum/status/2039030085219434526?s=61

It would be more fun if he was a furry or an adult baby. This is just tawdry.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:44am:

It would be more fun if he was a furry or an adult baby. This is just tawdry.

Maybe there's more to come.

I hope so - her life needs to be completely destroyed.

Evil POS that she is.

She was screwing around behind his back too.

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lrf0CKM02uo/hq720.jpg

Well of course a child rapist would have no problems hiring a dog killer and her closet case husband for a cabinet level position.

MAGA family values. What does Frank have to say? (Happy Trans Day of Visibility, Frannie!)

So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought.

Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:23am:

So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought.

Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well?

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:13am:

Well of course a child rapist would have no problems hiring a dog killer and her closet case husband for a cabinet level position. MAGA family values. What does Frank have to say? (Happy Trans Day of Visibility, Frannie!)

There's a long line of cross-dressers, trannies, and closeted gays in the GOP.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:42am:

Also, who leaked this? Trump? Miller?

Miller, under instructions from the rapist.

First good thing he's done in his miserable life.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:25am:

Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:23am: So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought. Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well?

Dong? Dong? Are you implying that raping a child is a virtue of the right and wearing face boobs makes one a leftie? Is that what you are saying by your silence?

Can John Waters please make a movie based on the Trump years?

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:54am:

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:25am: Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:23am: So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought. Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well? Dong? Dong? Are you implying that raping a child is a virtue of the right and wearing face boobs makes one a leftie? Is that what you are saying by your silence?

The White House is full of convicted, adjudicated or alleged rapists, kiddie fiddlers, wife beaters, sexual predators, etc.

It's almost as if it's a prerequisite for working with Trump.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:58am:

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:54am: Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:25am: Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:23am: So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought. Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well? Dong? Dong? Are you implying that raping a child is a virtue of the right and wearing face boobs makes one a leftie? Is that what you are saying by your silence? The White House is full of convicted, adjudicated or alleged rapists, kiddie fiddlers, wife beaters, sexual predators, etc. It's almost as if it's a prerequisite for working with Trump.

You forgot "adulterer." (Noem included)

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 10:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:58am: Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:54am: Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:25am: Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:23am: So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought. Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well? Dong? Dong? Are you implying that raping a child is a virtue of the right and wearing face boobs makes one a leftie? Is that what you are saying by your silence? The White House is full of convicted, adjudicated or alleged rapists, kiddie fiddlers, wife beaters, sexual predators, etc. It's almost as if it's a prerequisite for working with Trump. You forgot "adulterer." (Noem included)

Yes, I forgot that one.

Noem has been screwing White House staff behind her husband's back - that's well documented.

Quote:

National Security experts consulted by the Daily Mail say his brazen behavior could have left the 54-year-old MAGA favorite, who oversaw ICE's aggressive crackdown until she was removed from her position on March 5, vulnerable to blackmail. 'If a media organization can find this out, you can assume with a high degree of confidence that a hostile intelligence service knows this as well,' warned former CIA officer Marc Polymeropoulos. In a selfie shared with one of his online contacts, Bryon, an insurance mogul, and the rugged father-of-three can be seen squeezing into a flesh-colored crop-top and skintight pink shorts.

How divine. I don't know about you, leftards, but I think Kristie's hubby should be congratulated for his fabulous outfits.

Who cares about the narkie old CIA? They're such Debbie Downers in their silly black suits and ties. They dress like a bunch of Mormons.

Despicable stuff.

Look, if Mr Noem wishes to express his feminine side, we should support him. He's gender fluid, and that's okay. If he wants to go by they/them, we need to respect his preferred choice of pronouns.

I do hope he had a suitable matching purse. Did the Daily Mail catch a glimpse?

We may need to read the society pages.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 9:54am:

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:25am: Biggest donger wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 9:23am: So Noems husband is a leftie, who would have thought. Does a child rapist qualify as a "leftist" as well? Dong? Dong? Are you implying that raping a child is a virtue of the right and wearing face boobs makes one a leftie? Is that what you are saying by your silence?

I think he is, Proud Gay.

I just hope his face boobs match his strap-on front bottom.

I do find it important to get the skin tone just so.

You?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:39am:

That's hilarious    ;D First she gets sacked, and now her husband embarrasses her on the world stage. She deserves to have her life ruined. Love it   :)

It's the same reason that CPAC crashes Grinder and other gay hookup services every year...

Conservatives, they're all repressed pole smokers who take out their anger at having to hide who they really are out on minorities or women.

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 12:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 1st, 2026 at 8:39am: That's hilarious    ;D First she gets sacked, and now her husband embarrasses her on the world stage. She deserves to have her life ruined. Love it   :) It's the same reason that CPAC crashes Grinder and other gay hookup services every year... Conservatives, they're all repressed pole smokers who take out their anger at having to hide who they really are out on minorities or women.

Lindsey Graham, we're looking at you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wic4uiy111s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qADTr7d6gMU

Upon reflection, I realized that he is not a cross-dresser. That's pure fetish.

I had no idea these people were grandparents. Can you imagine?

Noem has bad skin.

The Daily Show supports him because if she can dress up in ridiculous outfits, he should be able to as well.

Kristi Noem's Husband Gets Busty & Lindsey Graham Spotted at Disney World | The Daily Show

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qADTr7d6gMU

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:46pm:

Upon reflection, I realized that he is not a cross-dresser. That's pure fetish. I had no idea these people were grandparents. Can you imagine? Noem has bad skin.

Seriously?

Botox Barbie shouldn't be anywhere near children.

She shoots puppies in the face, FFS.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:44am:

It would be more fun if he was a furry or an adult baby. This is just tawdry.

yes, hardly even tawdry

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:42am:

Also, who leaked this? Trump? Miller?

Now we know with 100% certainty that it was Trump who released the photos.

Trump told the Daily Mail he did not know about the photos and was surprised the Noem family confirmed their authenticity.

"They confirmed it? Wow, well, I feel badly for the family if that's the case, that's too bad," Trump told the outlet. "I haven't seen anything. I don't know anything about it. That's too bad, but I just know nothing about it."

So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman?

Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people.

What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy.

You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me.

And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense.

That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do.

You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it.

And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny.

So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:54pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it.

Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities?

I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas.

Why?

Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another.

Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 12:32pm:

So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet?

Nobody hates him, Frank.

Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal.

If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine.  Good luck to him.

The problem here is his repugnant wife.

She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to.

The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc.

They express hatred for the LBGT community.

They make laws that discriminate against them.

Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy.

It's about hypocrisy, Frank.

If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay.

His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wic4uiy111s

trumps cultists are keen to hide away child rapists but cannot stand a man wearing a dress.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:01pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? Nobody hates him, Frank. Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal. If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine.  Good luck to him. The problem here is his repugnant wife. She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to. The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc. They express hatred for the LBGT community. They make laws that discriminate against them. Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy. It's about hypocrisy, Frank. If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay. His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wic4uiy111s

Did his wife dress him??

How is she responsible for his perversions?

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it.

The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent.

This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it.

And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:23pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest.

This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic.

Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor?

Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism.

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:23pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest. This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic. Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor? Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency? Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism.

MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama.  Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left.

Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies.

Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...?

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 1^st, 2026 at 8:46pm:

Upon reflection, I realized that he is not a cross-dresser. That's pure fetish. I had no idea these people were grandparents. Can you imagine? Noem has bad skin.

So does Gordon, Proud Gay.

I wonder if he's married to a closet trannie.

They could compare dick pics, no?

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

Good to see you championing trans rights, dear boy. I could not agree more.

Kristi's hubby should be free to identify as a hot chick and use the powder room of her choice.

And you have to use her preferred pronouns.

Say it.

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 2:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 2:01pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? Nobody hates him, Frank. Nobody cares what he does in his private life, as long as it's legal. If he wants to dress up as a woman, that's fine.  Good luck to him. The problem here is his repugnant wife. She pretends to be a Christian and tells everyone that they should live the way she (and the GOP) tells them to. The Republicans look down at homosexuals, trans, cross-dressers, etc. They express hatred for the LBGT community. They make laws that discriminate against them. Yet when one of their own is found out to be a part of the LGBT community they demand prayers and privacy. It's about hypocrisy, Frank. If Botox Barbie's husband wants to wear fake boobs, that's perfectly okay. His repugnant adulteress wife (and her party), however, should not criticise others for similar behaviour. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wic4uiy111s Did his wife dress him?? How is she responsible for his perversions?

What?

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:45pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:38pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:23pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest. This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic. Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor? Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency? Blaming EVERYTHING on Trump is a deranged idiocy, it weakens any legitimate criticism. MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama.  Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left. Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies. Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...?

Excuse I, Sad, that's unfair.

Fran has repeatedly warned you to go back to his mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep.

It's not too much to ask, shurely.

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:38pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:23pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest. This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic. Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor? Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency?

He's right, Sad. Why weren't you people posting about Kristi's hubby when Sleepy Joe was prez?

Trust the leftards.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Part 1 The Rednecks & Nazis
Part 2 The Gays & Cowards

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUcn-nRJvKQ

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 1:21pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying.

Watch, listen, and learn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUcn-nRJvKQ

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 3:45pm:

MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama.  Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left. Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies. Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...?

Who is blaming this on Biden or Obama, ffs.

Your hormone treatment is playing havoc. 

And what exactly does it have to do with Trump? Did he dress the bozo? Did he tell Noem to dress the bozo? Did he tell ghe Dacota and federal congress to dress the bozo and then ignore it ?

What exactly is Trump's role in this, apart from you crazy kids going, well, crazy about anything and everything that occurs in America while he iz prez.


Please explain what Trump's role is in Noem's husband's cross dressing. I am not asking for the creepy gweggy disgusting, repulsive,  moronic grimacing.  Do you have anything else? Or just variations on the creepy wanky theme we tired of years ago.

Frank wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 7:54pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:45pm: MAGA are STILL blaming everything on Biden or Obama.  Get your own house in order before you have a sook about the left. Especially when the vast majority of the flak Trump gets is because of his own actions or the outcomes of his policies. Unless you want us to go back to your mental health retreat where everything is rebranded, even reality, to match the safe space required to be an unquestioning MAGA sheep...? Who is blaming this on Biden or Obama, ffs. Your hormone treatment is playing havoc.  And what exactly does it have to do with Trump? Did he dress the bozo? Did he tell Noem to dress the bozo? Did he tell ghe Dacota and federal congress to dress the bozo and then ignore it ? What exactly is Trump's role in this, apart from you crazy kids going, well, crazy about anything and everything that occurs in America while he iz prez. Please explain what Trump's role is in Noem's husband's cross dressing. I am not asking for the creepy gweggy disgusting, repulsive,  moronic grimacing.  Do you have anything else? Or just variations on the creepy wanky theme we tired of years ago.

Look, listen and learn.

https://youtu.be/FUcn-nRJvKQ?si=eDfnHwW26iuAMEKm

Of course, these MAGAts, like Frannie, claim this was all faked, it doesn't matter, or that it has nothing to do with Trump.  They learned well from their orange leader.

She's a mess, and Trump hired her.

Big Donger wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 6:02pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:38pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:23pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest. This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic. Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor? Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency? He's right, Sad. Why weren't you people posting about Kristi's hubby when Sleepy Joe was prez? Trust the leftards. SO UNFAIR !!!

Yeah, well, Sleepy Joe sniffed an intern's hair.

Quote:

Noem's husband is cross dresser

I suspect that anyone close to Noem would be looking at all their options.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 2^nd, 2026 at 9:16pm:

Big Donger wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 6:02pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:38pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 3:23pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 1:21pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:54pm: Frank wrote on Apr 2nd, 2026 at 12:32pm: So is he a dirty pervert  - or a brave trans woman who is as real a woman as any woman? Are you snarling mongs haters or brave allies? Have you decided yet? The thing is Frank, no one of any consequence is attacking him for being a cross-dresser or enjoying it. There's nothing inherently wrong with that, not to normal people. What people are calling out is the rank hypocrisy. You lot have spent years turning identity into a political weapon, targeting anyone who isn't a straight white man as a convenient punching bag, only to suddenly discover tolerance the moment it becomes politically useful. Spare me. And let's be honest about what this is, it's a distraction. The moment the conversation turns to something uncomfortable, like whether the Strait of Hormuz was closed before Trump chose to bomb Iran, suddenly we're off into culture war nonsense. That's not an accident. That's the playbook. That's what YOU do. You don't get to spend years fuelling vile, hateful attacks on minorities, then clutch your pearls and cry foul when the same energy comes back your way. If anything, you've normalised it. And more to the point, you don't get to derail the conversation every time Trump's decisions come under scrutiny. So no, you're not in a position to lecture anyone about tone, not when this is the exact strategy you fall back on every single time the spotlight lands where you don't want it. Did Bryon Noem spend years punching minorities? I never heard of him until this thread apeared. You mongs would have a completely different tune if Pete Bottygieg's husband had dressed up as a woman with fake tatas. Why? Because to you yeah but no but mongs it's a sordid perversion if one class of people do it but brave 'trans woemen are women' empowerment when another. Your idiotic, woke pieties always clash but you just press on regrdless. Ludicrous.   And hypocritical - that goes without saying. The real issue here isn't the cross-dressing, that's a complete distraction and, frankly, nobody serious cares about it. The concern is the national security risk. Reports indicate he was operating in online communities where he spent tens of thousands of dollars on models, with some allegedly becoming aware of his identity and leveraging that for financial pressure. Whether that rises to outright extortion or not, it is precisely the kind of compromised position that security vetting is designed to detect and prevent. This is why dismantling rigorous background checks and vetting processes is so reckless. Those systems exist to identify vulnerabilities, financial, personal, or behavioural, that could be exploited by hostile actors. Removing them doesn't eliminate risk, it institutionalises it. And that's the part MAGA and Trump supporters consistently ignore. They posture endlessly about national security, but when faced with a clear example of an avoidable vulnerability within their own ranks, they suddenly lose all interest. This is a new angle. None of the creeps on this thread had any interest in it, they just all went full grimacing moron on the topic. Noem has been a governor.  Before that, congresswoman. Before that State rep. At which point in her near-20 year public carer has she been inadequatly screened. Just now that Trump appointed her, a state governor? Was the bloke not cross dressing while the was a governor during Biden's presidency? He's right, Sad. Why weren't you people posting about Kristi's hubby when Sleepy Joe was prez? Trust the leftards. SO UNFAIR !!! Yeah, well, Sleepy Joe sniffed an intern's hair.

True, true. And how much kompromat did Vlad have on him for the hair sniffing, Proud Gay?

The Homeland Security Secretary's spent the past year paying off Vlad, Bibi, Maduro and half a dozen Mexican cartel bosses for her hubby's pecadillos.

You?

This is why she was fired, without a doubt. Team Trump knew this was going to "burst." I suspect there's a lot more scandalous material out there.

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Apr 3^rd, 2026 at 2:11am:

This is why she was fired, without a doubt. Team Trump knew this was going to "burst." I suspect there's a lot more scandalous material out there.

We'll have to keep abreast of things.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HEv87dDbEAEiVl9.jpg