| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> Tulsi Gabbard http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1774414496 Message started by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 2:54pm |
|
|
Title: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 2:54pm Listen to Gabbard's answers to the first two questions. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/z3CK1VGnty4 Iran's nuclear enrichment program was obliterated? "Yes" There has been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability. Correct? "That's right" Is Gabbard lying? If not, why did the US attack Iran and murder 150 little school girls? |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 3:15pm Silence from the MAGA cult members. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by SadKangaroo on Mar 25th, 2026 at 3:33pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 2:54pm:
I'm going to give you an honest answer, at least from a nuclear point of view, because I doubt the usual suspects will. One of the clearest consequences of Donald Trump tearing up Barack Obama's Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is this: we went from a system where Iran's nuclear program was constrained, monitored, and transparent, to one where it is expanded, opaque, and far closer to weapons capability. Under that agreement, Iran was capped at low enrichment levels, their stockpiles were limited, and international inspectors had visibility over what they had and where it was. That matters, because transparency is the difference between a manageable problem and a strategic blindfold. After Trump withdrew and tried to strong-arm a better deal, Iran escalated. Enrichment increased to levels far beyond civilian requirements, and oversight deteriorated. Reports suggest that, at one point, Iran still possessed enough enriched uranium to eventually produce the equivalent of roughly 16 fission bombs if taken to weapons-grade. The enrichment wasn't complete, around 60%, but that's already dangerously close to weapons-grade, and enough to produce yields that would be militarily significant. The key point: this material is no longer fully trackable under the old inspection regime, it's effectively outside of the reach of US intelligence. This is a key, yet scary point, because it's another reason Trump may use to justify boots on the ground to locate and recover this material. Now layer on what's happened in 2026. Regarding regime change, the killing of Ali Khamenei didn't produce moderation or stability, it triggered a forced succession that elevated Mojtaba Khamenei through the formal system. The end result is a more hardline figure, taking power in a far more volatile environment, with less transparency and more incentive to pursue deterrence in the form of Nuclear weapons. So where does that leave us? We now have: - A nuclear program that is less constrained than it was under the JCPOA - Reduced international visibility over that program - A leadership structure that is more hardline and less predictable - A region that is closer to open conflict, with global knock-on effects for oil, food, and economic stability This is the part people keep trying to dodge. You don't get to claim "strength" while ignoring outcomes. The outcome here is a more dangerous, less transparent nuclear situation than the one that existed before. Could this have been avoided if Trump had done NOTHING? All we can say with certainty is that the deal that was in place was containing the problem. Trump's actions that followed didn't solve it, they accelerated it. Has Trump made things worse by not doing NOTHING? Undeniable. That's the reality, whether it's politically convenient or not. And now the US is at war with Iran, without congressional backing, already begging for more funding and help from allies because, as Trump was pre-warned, Iran has closed the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation from the US attacks with a clear plan to errode the US dollar by planning to only allow oil containers through if they've purchased their oil using Chinese Yuan. Doing NOTHING would have meant this current war with Iran would not have been necessary. We are only in this situation because of Trump's past failures and continued inability as the Deal Maker in Chief to make a deal with Iran when Obama was able to, and it was working. So, for anyone to use Iran's nuclear capability as a justification for the war needs first to admit that this is only a possible justification because of Trump's past failures. He created the mess that needs to be cleaned up by "bombing them to smithereens". If the usual suspects are unable to do that, they're not arguing in good faith and should be ignored. I've got a neat little script that can hide their posts, should anyone want it. What Trump did has made the situation much, much worse, with the price being paid by everyone who needs to eat or requires oil anywhere in their daily lives, so practically everyone on the planet. Trump's incompetence has reached further than any single person in living memory, perhaps in recorded human history. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Melanias purse on Mar 25th, 2026 at 5:27pm
I know, Sad, but what's wrong with tanking the global economy and initiating a new era of austerity?
Old people need to die off eventually, you know. Lives of pure garbage. What's wrong with applying a bit of the good old evolutionary blowtorch? |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Frank on Mar 25th, 2026 at 5:35pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 2:54pm:
They just wanted to take out the school girls. That's what this is all about. Trump is a taliban plant. Happy, despicable, repulsive creep?? |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 6:57pm Frank wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 5:35pm:
Did Gabbard lie? Why can't you answer? What are you afraid of? |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Frank on Mar 25th, 2026 at 7:19pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
What are you asking, lying, slanderous creep? Why the executive makes a decision that doesnt follow one oaricular advice? Was there any other consideration? Of course there was. But for dspicable shhits like you, the monomania IS ALL. You will hammer a particularshirg youtube clip because for morons like you short youtube clips are all. Slovenia. Slovenlia. *uckoffskistan. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 7:33pm Frank wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 7:19pm:
Did Gabbard lie when she said Iran's enrichment program was obliterated last year and that there has been no effort since then to rebuild their enrichment capability? A simple yes or no will suffice. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Frank on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:00pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 7:33pm:
No. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:26pm Frank wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:00pm:
Ah. So Trump lied. Now we're getting somewhere. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Melanias purse on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:29pm
Him no speaka, Greggery
Yeah-but-no-but-yeah-but-no, innit. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Frank on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:41pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:26pm:
No. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:45pm Frank wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:41pm:
Oh, he most certainly did. "they attempted to rebuild their nuclear program" Ghastly Gabbard said they didn't. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Frank on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:49pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:45pm:
Whatever. Now they have no air force, no navy, no come back. All they have is hair, the swarthg buggers. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:57pm Frank wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 8:49pm:
Apology accepted. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Jasin on Mar 25th, 2026 at 9:37pm
As Captain Avery said in the book Master & Commander regarding a story by Lord Nelson.
It's a case of "the lesser of the two weavils" (lies) ;) There are those who tell lies to take action against evil. There are those who tell lies to hide behind their inaction. (Aka Starmer, Anus, Bowen, etc) Do you really think Trump is that dumb to tell your treacherous idiot mainstream Media everything or the truth, knowing full well you're better assisting his bluff against YOUR Terrorists. ;D You just can't be trusted. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Chinese Lesbian on Mar 25th, 2026 at 9:43pm
Tulsi’s political career is dead. Everyone hates the bitch
|
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 25th, 2026 at 11:27pm Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 9:43pm:
Tru dat. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by LNP never again on Mar 26th, 2026 at 7:15am
Is trump still in epstein files , yes and no fake war on terror will change that
|
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 7:40am LNP never again wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 7:15am:
Trump's in the Epstein files more than Epstein is. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Dnarever on Mar 26th, 2026 at 9:47am greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25th, 2026 at 7:33pm:
No but also did Iran only recomense their nuclear program because Trump cancelled the deal for them not to? Quote:
Yes when you elect a stupid President - you then have a stupid President. He has literally illegally attacked a nation because of his own stupid failed decisions. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Dnarever on Mar 26th, 2026 at 9:53am Quote:
The only thing politically that as far as we know Tulsi hasn't been yet is a communist. Though there was a time when the right did call her that. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:14am Dnarever wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 9:53am:
She's a truly horrible person. One of the worst in Trump's cabinet, and that's saying something. Diaper Don should put her back in a uniform and send her to Iran. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:27am
Judging by hate and whinge thrown at Tulsi from left she is great human being. :)
|
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:30am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:27am:
That's a bit of a stretch. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:40am greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:30am:
Your vile post proves my point ;D |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:41am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:40am:
Oh, the irony. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Dnarever on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:42am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:27am:
Do you remember what the right were saying about her when she was a Green progressive Democrat. She first campaigned and was elected as a progressive. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:49am Dnarever wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:42am:
She has zero interest in the people of America. She's only in politics to feather her own nest. And she doesn't care who she hurts along the way. A truly vile creature, much like Bondi and Noem. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:50am Dnarever wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:42am:
Accepting fair criticism and having the willingness to change are recognized as hallmarks of growth, leadership, and emotional intelligence. This capacity allows individuals and organizations to turn feedback into an opportunity for improvement. Tulsi is a great and wise leader!!! |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:53am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:50am:
She's a repugnant POS protecting war criminals and paedophiles. So, she fits right in with the GOP. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Dnarever on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:55am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:50am:
Quote:
Yes but a willingness to believe in whatever pays best is different. She changed too often and too quickly as example she went from being elected as a progressive Democrat to joining the Corporate Democrats in a matter of days. In just a few years she went from Green Social Democrat to Progressive Democrat to Corporate Democrat to Republican to MAGA Nutter republican In just a year or two. She would believe in vegemite if it payed well enough. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by aquascoot on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:56am
Great lady .
Indigenous. Self made. Catholic. Hot. She has been on rogan a few times and is very articulate and sensible. America's version of the wonderful Jacinta price. Gweggy hates them because he is a misogynist and hates indigenous people. Is gweggy a member of the Klan |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:59am aquascoot wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:56am:
Lol ;D Nobody mentioned her gender or cultural background. You've just exposed yourself. Nice own goal, bigot. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:59am Dnarever wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:55am:
And Russian spy. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:06am Dnarever wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:55am:
Flexible pragmatism is better then ossified ideology. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:18am |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:30am
So Tulsi not only beautiful but also smart :D
That is another plus!!! |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:37am |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Jasin on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:39am
Was Pecca's Soviet grandparents involved in executions in Yugoslavia?
|
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by tallowood on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:46am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 10:27am:
Pecca keeps proving this again and again ;D |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Jasin on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:53am tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:46am:
When he can't get at the Big Fella. He attacks his women. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by Melanias purse on Mar 26th, 2026 at 1:14pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:37am: Ee-gad, is this true? Tulsi sued Hillary for saying she was a Russian asset, then withdrew her suit? Oo-er, sounds a bit rude. Something smells hideously fishy here, Greggery. And it's not Melania's panties. |
|
Title: Re: Tulsi Gabbard Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 26th, 2026 at 5:59pm Big Donger wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 1:14pm:
;D |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |