The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated.
They prefer fatties with purple hair.

Not donny.

He is a true hero to the quality woman

---

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 12:56pm:

He is a true hero to the quality woman

What do you mean by a "quality woman"?

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 3:31pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"?

This seems what the left mean by a quality woman

---

Trump loves  women girls.

---

Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 3:52pm:

Trump loves  women girls.

Get your hand off Jeff's babe, big guy.

She's taken.

Aqua - learn how to resize your pics:


https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 4:17pm:

Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg

How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons.

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 4:39pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons.

You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture
and making the window smaller.


img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 4:51pm:

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:39pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons. You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture and making the window smaller. img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote

Yes, but which image link do you stick in the ...?

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 4:54pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:51pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:39pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons. You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture and making the window smaller. img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote Yes, but which image link do you stick in the ...?

The same link that Aqua posted.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 5:00pm:

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:54pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:51pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:39pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons. You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture and making the window smaller. img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote Yes, but which image link do you stick in the ...? The same link that Aqua posted. https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg

Oh look.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/images__18__008.jpeg

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 5:05pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 5:00pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:54pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:51pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:39pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons. You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture and making the window smaller. img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote Yes, but which image link do you stick in the ...? The same link that Aqua posted. https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg Oh look. https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/images__18__008.jpeg

Is that your girlfriend karmal ?

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 5:29pm:

Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 5:05pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 5:00pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:54pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:51pm: Big Donger wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:39pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:17pm: Aqua - learn how to resize your pics: https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg How do you do it, Bobby? I can never tell which link to post in the img buttons. You have to add the width and height which you can find by inspecting the picture and making the window smaller. img width=410 height=511]https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg[/img][/quote Yes, but which image link do you stick in the ...? The same link that Aqua posted. https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/FB_IMG_1774279582497.jpg Oh look. https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/images__18__008.jpeg Is that your girlfriend karmal ?

I should be so lucky, dear. She's not by any chance married to an indigenous spear-throwing consultant up in Noosa, is she?

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 3:43pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman

Why are you so afraid to answer?

When you compare Biden, Albo and Starmer to Trump, Johnson and Morrison

It's like comparing the Village People to Trump, Johnson and Morrison

;D ;D ;D

Jasin wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 7:33pm:

When you compare Biden, Albo and Starmer to Trump, Johnson and Morrison It's like comparing the Village People to Trump, Johnson and Morrison ;D ;D ;D

Isn't it Tump that does the village people dance thinking it's not strange and embarrising ?

Dnarever wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 7:32am:

Jasin wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 7:33pm: When you compare Biden, Albo and Starmer to Trump, Johnson and Morrison It's like comparing the Village People to Trump, Johnson and Morrison ;D ;D ;D Isn't it Tump that does the village people dance thinking it's not strange and embarrising ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=InBXu-iY7cw

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 7:10pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:43pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman Why are you so afraid to answer?

Still no answer from aquascoot on that one.

Telling.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 7:40am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 7:10pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:43pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman Why are you so afraid to answer? Still no answer from aquascoot on that one. Telling.

"A lot of trophy wives, it doesn't work out," the president noted as he spoke to graduating cadets at the military academy.

Trump ought to know. He and Melania no longer live together--and haven't for years.

At other points in the graduation speech, the MAGA hat-clad Trump referred to the United States the “hottest country in the world” and credited himself for rebuilding the American military

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-west-point-trophy-wives_n_683200dee4b0b9b9367dab40

Trump himself cheated on his 1st wife with his 2nd wife. Trump cheated on his 2nd with with his 3rd wife. Trump paid a porn star for sex 4 months after his 3rd wife gave birth to Barron

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 7:45am:

Trump himself cheated on his 1st wife with his 2nd wife. Trump cheated on his 2nd with with his 3rd wife. Trump paid a porn star for sex 4 months after his 3rd wife gave birth to Barron

https://i.imgur.com/uNputDr.jpeg

The Lefties here consider Karnal Purse & Proud Gay Aussie as quality women, beard stubble and hairy balls n' all.

The Wokey Left say "Not that there's anything wrong with that"
But the rest of humanity say "Definitely something very wrong with that, just like Rednecks like Nazis and Mussos"

Jasin wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 12:05pm:

The Lefties here consider Karnal Purse & Proud Gay Aussie as quality women, beard stubble and hairy balls n' all. The Wokey Left say "Not that there's anything wrong with that" But the rest of humanity say "Definitely something very wrong with that, just like Rednecks like Nazis and Mussos"

As a trans Chinese lesbian, I have no idea what you are talking about, but find you charming, as usual.

Jasin wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 12:05pm:

The Lefties here consider Karnal Purse & Proud Gay Aussie as quality women, beard stubble and hairy balls n' all. The Wokey Left say "Not that there's anything wrong with that" But the rest of humanity say "Definitely something very wrong with that, just like Rednecks like Nazis and Mussos"

Excuse me, is there anything wrong with Nazis?

How rude. No one has the right to not be not offended, no?

SO UNFAIR !!!

Likes 13 year old girls

LNP never again wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 7:16am:

Likes 13 year old girls

During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a)

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 7:42am:

LNP never again wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 7:16am: Likes 13 year old girls During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a)

That would be the plaintiff named Jane Doe  :D :D :D :D

aquascoot thinks it's funny that children who are victims of rape have to hide their true identity.

Oh dear   ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 11:01am:

aquascoot thinks it's funny that children who are victims of rape have to hide their true identity. Oh dear   ::)

next he will be in favor of murder

Emerging Chinese Lesbian wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 11:04am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:01am: aquascoot thinks it's funny that children who are victims of rape have to hide their true identity. Oh dear   ::) next he will be in favor of murder

Didn't he cheer on the ICE terrorists who murdered innocent US citizens in Minneapolis?

Didn't you cheer on the BLM and illegal immigrants who burned, looted, rioted, raped, bashed and killed American citizens across the country?
Oh yes. You did.
Your moral compass has a fridge magnet attached to it.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 7:10pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:43pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman Why are you so afraid to answer?

Scoot?

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 11:37am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 7:10pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:43pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman Why are you so afraid to answer? Scoot?

This young Iranian women went forward with a spirit of bravery and courage to defy the evil establishment and will now be executed.

Thus a quality woman.

Women of the left like say , grace tame or mahreen fanuki or fatima payman go forward with a spirit of entitlement  compliance with a woke ideology and are in no danger of being executed for supporting a misogynistic brutal regime

Thus a non quality woman ,

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 12:30pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 11:37am: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 7:10pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:43pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 3:31pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: He is a true hero to the quality woman What do you mean by a "quality woman"? This seems what the left mean by a quality woman Why are you so afraid to answer? Scoot? This young Iranian women went forward with a spirit of bravery and courage to defy the evil establishment and will now be executed. Thus a quality woman. Women of the left like say , grace tame or mahreen fanuki or fatima payman go forward with a spirit of entitlement  compliance with a woke ideology and are in no danger of being executed for supporting a misogynistic brutal regime Thus a non quality woman ,

I know, but what about the filly?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/images__18__008.jpeg

She's resilient, off the grid and runs her own motivational business.

Lose weight now, ask me how, no?

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 12:30pm:

This young Iranian women went forward with a spirit of bravery and courage to defy the evil establishment and will now be executed. Thus a quality woman. Women of the left like say , grace tame or mahreen fanuki or fatima payman go forward with a spirit of entitlement  compliance with a woke ideology and are in no danger of being executed for supporting a misogynistic brutal regime Thus a non quality woman ,

You elevate one Iranian woman to "quality" because she defies a brutal regime and faces execution. Fine, courageous, yes. But then you dismiss Grace Tame, Mahreen Fanuki, and Fatima Payman as "non-quality" for supposedly acting within some "woke ideology" and not being at risk of execution.

Here's the problem: all three of them have stood up against entrenched power structures, challenged institutions, and faced real-world consequences, harassment, legal battles, political attacks. They have risked themselves to push against the establishment. By your own logic, shouldn't that make them "quality" too?

Or does bravery only count when death is literally imminent?

So women are only quality if they're about to be executed?

And let's be honest here, it looks suspiciously like you've lifted this "quality women" standard straight from the beta-cucks populating the manosphere, the same crowd that reduces women to arbitrary hierarchies designed to flatter their own fragile egos. That's not a measure of courage or principle, it's a borrowed ranking system meant to feed insecurity.

If you're going to continue using "quality" as a standard, spell it out. What exactly do you mean by quality?

Is it a willingness to risk life under a dictatorship?

Willingness to confront any power, regardless of context?

Or is it just a partisan, copied-and-pasted brainrot to decide whose courage counts and whose doesn't?

Until you clarify, all you're doing is throwing around arbitrary labels to suit your worldview and pretending that's insight.

Right now, "quality" is just an empty buzzword wrapped in contradiction and manosphere cosplay.

Define your terms.

No need to worry skip, shes gone now.

Will grace and Fatima pay that price for standing up to this " power structure"  ::) ::) ::)

---

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:07pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 12:30pm: This young Iranian women went forward with a spirit of bravery and courage to defy the evil establishment and will now be executed. Thus a quality woman. Women of the left like say , grace tame or mahreen fanuki or fatima payman go forward with a spirit of entitlement  compliance with a woke ideology and are in no danger of being executed for supporting a misogynistic brutal regime Thus a non quality woman , You elevate one Iranian woman to "quality" because she defies a brutal regime and faces execution. Fine, courageous, yes. But then you dismiss Grace Tame, Mahreen Fanuki, and Fatima Payman as "non-quality" for supposedly acting within some "woke ideology" and not being at risk of execution. Here's the problem: all three of them have stood up against entrenched power structures, challenged institutions, and faced real-world consequences, harassment, legal battles, political attacks. They have risked themselves to push against the establishment. By your own logic, shouldn't that make them "quality" too? Or does bravery only count when death is literally imminent? So women are only quality if they're about to be executed? And let's be honest here, it looks suspiciously like you've lifted this "quality women" standard straight from the beta-cucks populating the manosphere, the same crowd that reduces women to arbitrary hierarchies designed to flatter their own fragile egos. That's not a measure of courage or principle, it's a borrowed ranking system meant to feed insecurity. If you're going to continue using "quality" as a standard, spell it out. What exactly do you mean by quality? Is it a willingness to risk life under a dictatorship? Willingness to confront any power, regardless of context? Or is it just a partisan, copied-and-pasted brainrot to decide whose courage counts and whose doesn't? Until you clarify, all you're doing is throwing around arbitrary labels to suit your worldview and pretending that's insight. Right now, "quality" is just an empty buzzword wrapped in contradiction and manosphere cosplay. Define your terms.

It's "partisan, copied-and-pasted brainrot".

Grace , the brave warrior went on the ABC  ::) ::) ::)



March 2026, former Australian of the Year Grace Tame sparked intense controversy by appearing to dismiss reports of sexual violence committed by Hamas during the October 7, 2023, attacks on Israel as "propaganda".
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
Australian Broadcasting Corporation
+1
The Controversy Details
The Comments: In an interview with ABC Radio Sydney in March 2026, Ms. Tame was asked about her previous, separate controversial, pro-Palestinian comments and her perceived silence on the sexual violence against Israeli women on October 7. Tame replied that reports of rape and sexual violence were “debunked propaganda”.



You and gweg can define quality woman to your preference and I will define it to my preference.

Or does the left now think I am not able to express such opinions?.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:07pm:

You elevate one Iranian woman to "quality" because she defies a brutal regime and faces execution. Fine, courageous, yes. But then you dismiss Grace Tame, Mahreen Fanuki, and Fatima Payman as "non-quality" for supposedly acting within some "woke ideology" and not being at risk of execution. Here's the problem: all three of them have stood up against entrenched power structures, challenged institutions, and faced real-world consequences, harassment, legal battles, political attacks. They have risked themselves to push against the establishment. By your own logic, shouldn't that make them "quality" too? Or does bravery only count when death is literally imminent? So women are only quality if they're about to be executed?

This is very stupid. It would be also sinister if it wasn't soooo stupid.


It takes a deranged village idiot from meanjin  :D to equate standing up to the Iranian theocracy with standing up in the Australian Parliament or on the ABC and spouting paki/pallo propaganda.

Pecca hates Melania.
He prefers Nancy fag hag Pelosi  ;D

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:18pm:

No need to worry skip, shes gone now. Will grace and Fatima pay that price for standing up to this " power structure"  ::) ::) ::)

And after all that, you've still not answered the question.

Why is it so damn hard for you and the rest of the usual suspects to actually explain what the words they throw around mean, or why they support something, or the goals they claim to back when defending someone's actions, while simultaneously demanding those who don't agree to propose alternate outcomes?

Do they genuinely not understand the thoughts they've been fed, or do they simply not believe they can defend their own positions without looking like fools?

This is a discussion forum, for God's sake. How are we meant to converse if you can't even articulate what you think? Is it that the light of day alone terrifies you?

Why even bother showing up?

Jasin wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 2:48pm:

Pecca hates Melania. He prefers Nancy fag hag Pelosi  ;D

I don't hate anyone.

Interesting you should bring up the Slovenian hooker.

Melania (Documentary, 2026)

IMDb RATING: 1.5/10

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 2:48pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 1:07pm: You elevate one Iranian woman to "quality" because she defies a brutal regime and faces execution. Fine, courageous, yes. But then you dismiss Grace Tame, Mahreen Fanuki, and Fatima Payman as "non-quality" for supposedly acting within some "woke ideology" and not being at risk of execution. Here's the problem: all three of them have stood up against entrenched power structures, challenged institutions, and faced real-world consequences, harassment, legal battles, political attacks. They have risked themselves to push against the establishment. By your own logic, shouldn't that make them "quality" too? Or does bravery only count when death is literally imminent? So women are only quality if they're about to be executed? This is very stupid. It would be also sinister if it wasn't soooo stupid. It takes a deranged village idiot from meanjin  :D to equate standing up to the Iranian theocracy with standing up in the Australian Parliament or on the ABC and spouting paki/pallo propaganda.

Disappeared bodies, mass burials and ‘30,000 dead’: what is the truth of Iran’s death toll?
This article is more than 1 month old
Testimony from medics, morgue and graveyard staff reveals huge state effort to conceal systematic killing of protesters




https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/iran-protests-death-toll-disappeared-bodies-mass-burials-30000-dead


And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al.
Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic.

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:00pm:

And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic.

Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:07pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling.

Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning.

The cult's Kryptonite is women.

And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it.

It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness.

I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:07pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling.

Childish name calling ?

You mean like gweg saying he knew several men who had screwed the slovakian whore and she smelt like a tuna that had been out in the sun for a week. Followed by karmal ( now malenias purse) talking about what bacteria inhabited her vagina.

That sort of name calling from your quality leftie friends  ::) ::) ::)

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:13pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Childish name calling ? You mean like gweg saying he knew several men who had screwed the slovakian whore and she smelt like a tuna that had been out in the sun for a week. Followed by karmal ( now malenias purse) talking about what bacteria inhabited her vagina. That sort of name calling from your quality leftie friends  ::) ::) ::)

It appears that you don't know what name calling is   :-/

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:07pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling.

Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning.

The cult's Kryptonite is women.

And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it.

It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness.

I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 12:56pm:

The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman

Confirmed

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:12pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning. The cult's Kryptonite is women. And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it. It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness. I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.

It ties them in knots every time. They feel compelled to diminish women, unless those women can be repurposed to serve some immediate narrative need, which is really just a projection of their own insecurities. But in doing so, they back themselves into a corner the moment you point out the obvious, Trump has never actually defeated a man in a presidential election.

So what happens next is predictable. They're forced into an awkward pivot, suddenly needing to elevate Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, if only slightly, just to make Trump's victories over them appear meaningful. The problem is they've usually spent so long tearing those same women down that they end up cheapening the very wins they're trying to celebrate.

And it gets worse when you step back and look at the broader picture. He couldn't even defeat Joe Biden, the supposedly "sleepy" opponent they mock endlessly. Instead, he managed something far less flattering, he attracted the largest number of votes against any candidate in US history, courtesy of the 2020 election's record turnout.

So they're left juggling contradictions of their own making, diminish the opponent and you diminish the victory, but elevate the opponent and you undermine the narrative that Trump is some uniquely dominant political force, who lost against the only man he faced.

It's no wonder his supporters always act so immasculated.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:12pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning. The cult's Kryptonite is women. And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it. It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness. I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.

Check out this lying fraud creep troll from the Troll Cave PA of banned losers.
Attacks more women in Politics than any other member like Aussie attacked female members here over his bygone years.
The only women he has spared so far are Hillary, Pelosi and Harris.

The bullsh#t from this Pecca niggaz flows like the Murrumbidgee River to the sea.
::) ::) ::)

tallowood wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:17pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman Confirmed https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png

😆🤣😂

Absolutely Gold ‼️

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:12pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning. The cult's Kryptonite is women. And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it. It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness. I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members. It ties them in knots every time. They feel compelled to diminish women, unless those women can be repurposed to serve some immediate narrative need, which is really just a projection of their own insecurities. But in doing so, they back themselves into a corner the moment you point out the obvious, Trump has never actually defeated a man in a presidential election. So what happens next is predictable. They're forced into an awkward pivot, suddenly needing to elevate Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, if only slightly, just to make Trump's victories over them appear meaningful. The problem is they've usually spent so long tearing those same women down that they end up cheapening the very wins they're trying to celebrate. And it gets worse when you step back and look at the broader picture. He couldn't even defeat Joe Biden, the supposedly "sleepy" opponent they mock endlessly. Instead, he managed something far less flattering, he attracted the largest number of votes against any candidate in US history, courtesy of the 2020 election's record turnout. So they're left juggling contradictions of their own making, diminish the opponent and you diminish the victory, but elevate the opponent and you undermine the narrative that Trump is some uniquely dominant political force, who lost against the only man he faced. It's no wonder his supporters always act so immasculated.

Indeed.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:07pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling.

:D
Yeah, double down on the stupid, why dontcha??

And ignore, ignore, ignore.  So here, again, what you are equating  standing up in the Australian Parliament with:


Disappeared bodies, mass burials and ‘30,000 dead’: what is the truth of Iran’s death toll?

Testimony from medics, morgue and graveyard staff reveals huge state effort to conceal systematic killing of protesters

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/iran-protests-death-t...


"Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D   "  is the correct appellation for you.

You are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al as if they were the same as thd 30,000  truly brave Iranians who did stand up to the evil mullahs and paid with their lives.

Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:12pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning. The cult's Kryptonite is women. And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it. It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness. I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.

You are both as stupid as each other. One naively stupid, the other creepily stupid.





Good vs evil.

I was honoured to finally meet @Ayaan today.

A courageous and relentless lady who despite having to live under security for 25 years, continues to warn about Islam and speak up for Muslim women's rights.

Real meaning of a feminist and voice of a generation.
https://x.com/TRobinsonNewEra/status/2036949531426775064

tallowood wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:17pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman Confirmed https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png

It's interesting how women are actually viewed within MAGA and broader right-wing circles, particularly in the US.

It's always amusing watching insecure conservative men try to lecture everyone else about "quality women", as if they've uncovered some timeless truth about human worth, when in reality they're just repackaging a fairly bleak, transactional view of relationships and dressing it up as wisdom.

Because if you actually follow that logic through, it doesn't elevate women, it reduces them. Value becomes conditional, tied to youth, appearance, fertility, and compliance. It's not respect, it's appraisal. Not partnership, but asset management.

It's the same thing that underpins the mansphere logic, only they're even more insecure than conservative men in general.

And that's where the contradiction creeps in.

They'll happily sneer at left-wing women as "low value", career-obsessed, undesirable, fatties with purple hair, whatever the insult of the day happens to be. But at the same time, they're promoting a model where a woman's worth is inherently temporary, where she is, by definition, on a clock. Where her "value" peaks early and declines, and where loyalty is contingent on her continuing to meet a standard that time itself guarantees she cannot maintain.

Hence the obsession with preserving the aesthetic, Mar-a-Lago face isn't an accident, it's the logical endpoint of a system that treats ageing as failure rather than inevitability.

So to the usual suspects, I ask to them, are women valued as people, or are they valued as depreciating assets?

Because the framework they're pushing answers that question pretty clearly. The "good" woman isn't respected for her agency or independence, she's rewarded for fitting a narrow brief. And the moment she no longer fits it, whether through age, illness, or just the realities of life, the logic of that system doesn't protect her, it rationalises replacing her.

That or this new attribute is that she's facing execution.  A good woman is a dead one apparently...

That's not a bug in the ideology, it's the feature.

Which makes the constant attempts to deride left-wing women as somehow lacking in value ring hollow. At least that side of politics isn't pretending that a woman's worth expires the moment she stops optimising herself for someone else's approval.

You can't simultaneously argue that women should be judged on a rigid hierarchy of "value", and then act surprised when people point out where that hierarchy actually leads.

And that's before you even get to what happens when someone inevitably falls out of that ideal. The same system that flatters women into thinking they're exceptions offers them very little once they're not. The dissonance has to go somewhere, and more often than not it gets redirected outward rather than examined.

That's why most "karens" are conservative women who no longer meet the "quality women" mould, but still expect the exceptions to the general mistreatment of women from conservative circles be made for them and when it isn't they lash out at servers or checkout staff etc.

As Rebecca Larsen puts it, far more bluntly than most, the promise isn't just conditional, it's structurally designed to fail most of the people buying into it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O7W-26nwvA

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:13pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:07pm: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:00pm: And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin  :D  are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al. Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic. Your insecurities are showing.  It is telling how petty you get when threatened by strong women, or any women, that you have to revert to childish name-calling. Childish name calling ? You mean like gweg saying he knew several men who had screwed the slovakian whore and she smelt like a tuna that had been out in the sun for a week. Followed by karmal ( now malenias purse) talking about what bacteria inhabited her vagina. That sort of name calling from your quality leftie friends  ::) ::) ::)

How utterly appalling and revolting: absolute lies - we never said any such thing.

For clarification, the correct answer is salmonella.

DRAIN THE SWAMP !!!

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 4:35pm:

tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:17pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman Confirmed https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png It's interesting how women are actually viewed within MAGA and broader right-wing circles, particularly in the US. It's always amusing watching insecure conservative men try to lecture everyone else about "quality women", as if they've uncovered some timeless truth about human worth, when in reality they're just repackaging a fairly bleak, transactional view of relationships and dressing it up as wisdom. Because if you actually follow that logic through, it doesn't elevate women, it reduces them. Value becomes conditional, tied to youth, appearance, fertility, and compliance. It's not respect, it's appraisal. Not partnership, but asset management. It's the same thing that underpins the mansphere logic, only they're even more insecure than conservative men in general. And that's where the contradiction creeps in. They'll happily sneer at left-wing women as "low value", career-obsessed, undesirable, fatties with purple hair, whatever the insult of the day happens to be. But at the same time, they're promoting a model where a woman's worth is inherently temporary, where she is, by definition, on a clock. Where her "value" peaks early and declines, and where loyalty is contingent on her continuing to meet a standard that time itself guarantees she cannot maintain. Hence the obsession with preserving the aesthetic, Mar-a-Lago face isn't an accident, it's the logical endpoint of a system that treats ageing as failure rather than inevitability. So to the usual suspects, I ask to them, are women valued as people, or are they valued as depreciating assets? Because the framework they're pushing answers that question pretty clearly. The "good" woman isn't respected for her agency or independence, she's rewarded for fitting a narrow brief. And the moment she no longer fits it, whether through age, illness, or just the realities of life, the logic of that system doesn't protect her, it rationalises replacing her. That or this new attribute is that she's facing execution.  A good woman is a dead one apparently... That's not a bug in the ideology, it's the feature. Which makes the constant attempts to deride left-wing women as somehow lacking in value ring hollow. At least that side of politics isn't pretending that a woman's worth expires the moment she stops optimising herself for someone else's approval. You can't simultaneously argue that women should be judged on a rigid hierarchy of "value", and then act surprised when people point out where that hierarchy actually leads. And that's before you even get to what happens when someone inevitably falls out of that ideal. The same system that flatters women into thinking they're exceptions offers them very little once they're not. The dissonance has to go somewhere, and more often than not it gets redirected outward rather than examined. That's why most "karens" are conservative women who no longer meet the "quality women" mould, but still expect the exceptions to the general mistreatment of women from conservative circles be made for them and when it isn't they lash out at servers or checkout staff etc. As Rebecca Larsen puts it, far more bluntly than most, the promise isn't just conditional, it's structurally designed to fail most of the people buying into it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O7W-26nwvA

That's enough mindless blather, Loretta.

Right wing woman ???

$2 a day Gina ?

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/2c2b/live/b2e0b620-1413-11ef-82e8-cd354766a224.jpg

Burka Hanson ? By far her best look.
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rwjP6dKqH9A/hq720.jpg?

Helecopter Vanstone ?
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/tPntrWhUbGLyDWYCTv46rt/7d42ce89-39f2-46f7-9671-3274ecba9f43.jpg/r0_7_2787_1571_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 4:59pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 4:35pm: tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:17pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman Confirmed https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png It's interesting how women are actually viewed within MAGA and broader right-wing circles, particularly in the US. It's always amusing watching insecure conservative men try to lecture everyone else about "quality women", as if they've uncovered some timeless truth about human worth, when in reality they're just repackaging a fairly bleak, transactional view of relationships and dressing it up as wisdom. Because if you actually follow that logic through, it doesn't elevate women, it reduces them. Value becomes conditional, tied to youth, appearance, fertility, and compliance. It's not respect, it's appraisal. Not partnership, but asset management. It's the same thing that underpins the mansphere logic, only they're even more insecure than conservative men in general. And that's where the contradiction creeps in. They'll happily sneer at left-wing women as "low value", career-obsessed, undesirable, fatties with purple hair, whatever the insult of the day happens to be. But at the same time, they're promoting a model where a woman's worth is inherently temporary, where she is, by definition, on a clock. Where her "value" peaks early and declines, and where loyalty is contingent on her continuing to meet a standard that time itself guarantees she cannot maintain. Hence the obsession with preserving the aesthetic, Mar-a-Lago face isn't an accident, it's the logical endpoint of a system that treats ageing as failure rather than inevitability. So to the usual suspects, I ask to them, are women valued as people, or are they valued as depreciating assets? Because the framework they're pushing answers that question pretty clearly. The "good" woman isn't respected for her agency or independence, she's rewarded for fitting a narrow brief. And the moment she no longer fits it, whether through age, illness, or just the realities of life, the logic of that system doesn't protect her, it rationalises replacing her. That or this new attribute is that she's facing execution.  A good woman is a dead one apparently... That's not a bug in the ideology, it's the feature. Which makes the constant attempts to deride left-wing women as somehow lacking in value ring hollow. At least that side of politics isn't pretending that a woman's worth expires the moment she stops optimising herself for someone else's approval. You can't simultaneously argue that women should be judged on a rigid hierarchy of "value", and then act surprised when people point out where that hierarchy actually leads. And that's before you even get to what happens when someone inevitably falls out of that ideal. The same system that flatters women into thinking they're exceptions offers them very little once they're not. The dissonance has to go somewhere, and more often than not it gets redirected outward rather than examined. That's why most "karens" are conservative women who no longer meet the "quality women" mould, but still expect the exceptions to the general mistreatment of women from conservative circles be made for them and when it isn't they lash out at servers or checkout staff etc. As Rebecca Larsen puts it, far more bluntly than most, the promise isn't just conditional, it's structurally designed to fail most of the people buying into it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O7W-26nwvA That's enough mindless blather, Loretta.

A considered and research post is mindless blather now?

Ah you must have been talking about your reply.

We can agree on that.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 8:34pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 4:59pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 4:35pm: tallowood wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 3:17pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 12:56pm: The leftie intellectual wants to see beautiful women exterminated. They prefer fatties with purple hair. Not donny. He is a true hero to the quality woman Confirmed https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/229x286q70/r/922/UvgO1L.png It's interesting how women are actually viewed within MAGA and broader right-wing circles, particularly in the US. It's always amusing watching insecure conservative men try to lecture everyone else about "quality women", as if they've uncovered some timeless truth about human worth, when in reality they're just repackaging a fairly bleak, transactional view of relationships and dressing it up as wisdom. Because if you actually follow that logic through, it doesn't elevate women, it reduces them. Value becomes conditional, tied to youth, appearance, fertility, and compliance. It's not respect, it's appraisal. Not partnership, but asset management. It's the same thing that underpins the mansphere logic, only they're even more insecure than conservative men in general. And that's where the contradiction creeps in. They'll happily sneer at left-wing women as "low value", career-obsessed, undesirable, fatties with purple hair, whatever the insult of the day happens to be. But at the same time, they're promoting a model where a woman's worth is inherently temporary, where she is, by definition, on a clock. Where her "value" peaks early and declines, and where loyalty is contingent on her continuing to meet a standard that time itself guarantees she cannot maintain. Hence the obsession with preserving the aesthetic, Mar-a-Lago face isn't an accident, it's the logical endpoint of a system that treats ageing as failure rather than inevitability. So to the usual suspects, I ask to them, are women valued as people, or are they valued as depreciating assets? Because the framework they're pushing answers that question pretty clearly. The "good" woman isn't respected for her agency or independence, she's rewarded for fitting a narrow brief. And the moment she no longer fits it, whether through age, illness, or just the realities of life, the logic of that system doesn't protect her, it rationalises replacing her. That or this new attribute is that she's facing execution.  A good woman is a dead one apparently... That's not a bug in the ideology, it's the feature. Which makes the constant attempts to deride left-wing women as somehow lacking in value ring hollow. At least that side of politics isn't pretending that a woman's worth expires the moment she stops optimising herself for someone else's approval. You can't simultaneously argue that women should be judged on a rigid hierarchy of "value", and then act surprised when people point out where that hierarchy actually leads. And that's before you even get to what happens when someone inevitably falls out of that ideal. The same system that flatters women into thinking they're exceptions offers them very little once they're not. The dissonance has to go somewhere, and more often than not it gets redirected outward rather than examined. That's why most "karens" are conservative women who no longer meet the "quality women" mould, but still expect the exceptions to the general mistreatment of women from conservative circles be made for them and when it isn't they lash out at servers or checkout staff etc. As Rebecca Larsen puts it, far more bluntly than most, the promise isn't just conditional, it's structurally designed to fail most of the people buying into it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1O7W-26nwvA That's enough mindless blather, Loretta. A considered and research post is mindless blather now? Ah you must have been talking about your reply. We can agree on that.

You blather like a menopusal woman.

What IS your point, your headline? You blather on and on and on.

Is Frank dealing with male menopause? Rule number one: don't be fat. Everything, including testosterone management, is just so much easier when you aren't fat, Frank.

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 8:38pm:

You blather like a menopusal woman. What IS your point, your headline? You blather on and on and on.

It's rather telling that being confronted with how the majority of your ideological brethren actually talk about and consider women provokes an immediate pivot to personal attacks. That kind of reflex doesn't come from confidence, it comes from discomfort. On some level, even if you won't admit it, you recognise the criticism lands.

You spend a lot of time curating this image of who you think you are, but the performance never quite survives contact with your behaviour. The gap between the persona and the reality is obvious to anyone paying attention.

And the funny thing is, I wasn't even addressing you. You weren't part of the quoted thread, yet you inserted yourself anyway, not to engage with the substance, but to deflect from it. That instinct to derail rather than respond is usually a sign that the point hit closer to home than you'd like.

As I said, entirely transparent.

Frank is a fat Pom.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 27^th, 2026 at 9:41am:

Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 8:38pm: You blather like a menopusal woman. What IS your point, your headline? You blather on and on and on. It's rather telling that being confronted with how the majority of your ideological brethren actually talk about and consider women provokes an immediate pivot to personal attacks

You 'confronted' me with no such thing.

You make up something and then blather about it at length. The only confronting thing is the endless, puffed-up, emotionally incontinent rhetoric. It runs away with you every time.

Frank wrote on Mar 27^th, 2026 at 10:48am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 9:41am: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 8:38pm: You blather like a menopusal woman. What IS your point, your headline? You blather on and on and on. It's rather telling that being confronted with how the majority of your ideological brethren actually talk about and consider women provokes an immediate pivot to personal attacks You 'confronted' me with no such thing. You make up something and then blather about it at length. The only confronting thing is the endless, puffed-up, emotionally incontinent rhetoric. It runs away with you every time.

I wasn't trying to do anything to you, I didn't even reply to or even include you, but if it wasn't so confronting, why were you so quick to uncontrollably reply with a personal attack or dismissal?

It's free real estate.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 27^th, 2026 at 1:07pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 10:48am: SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 9:41am: Frank wrote on Mar 26th, 2026 at 8:38pm: You blather like a menopusal woman. What IS your point, your headline? You blather on and on and on. It's rather telling that being confronted with how the majority of your ideological brethren actually talk about and consider women provokes an immediate pivot to personal attacks You 'confronted' me with no such thing. You make up something and then blather about it at length. The only confronting thing is the endless, puffed-up, emotionally incontinent rhetoric. It runs away with you every time. I wasn't trying to do anything to you, I didn't even reply to or even include you, but if it wasn't so confronting, why were you so quick to uncontrollably reply with a personal attack or dismissal? It's free real estate.

https://youtu.be/u7IzpcY0wyo?si=JhBKV4UZk6XK_Ouv