| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Australia's Migration Policies http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1774131515 Message started by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 8:18am |
|
|
Title: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 8:18am
One Nation's success in South Oz's state election was in part because of massive housing shortages due in large part to Fed Labor, and previously, the Coalition's open door migration policies.
People flooding in was supposed to fix the shortage of workers in the construction sector, yet it didn't. Doing the same thing over and expecting a different result will also not work. Predicted by around 2028, robots with Ai IQs of over 300 will be flooding the global economy. Their evolution up will be at breakneck speed. Humanity's workforce disappearance is a certainty. Labor, Coaiition, even Greens, have perpetual human population growth at their policy core. Working humans, propping up the perpetual debt growth needed to keep capitalism alive. Capitalism, a dead system walking. Another economic model will be required. Will a new form of communism be the winner Meanwhile Albanese marches on with more people flooding the country. O.N by default, rather than great policy planning will benefit from growing Australian voter anger next Federal election ... unless the other parties rethink their policies. And as seen from the very fast adaption required for rapid climate changes, politician adaption skills are lacking. Will Pauline Hanson (+ Gina) be the power behind the next Australian government ... all because Albanese flooded the country ? |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 2:53pm
Albanese urges 'vigilance' against those seeking to 'turn back the clock' on Australia
The prime minister says the country must be "vigilant" against politicians seeking to return to a bygone era of Australia that was less accepting of migrants, following the South Australian election in which One Nation overtook the Liberal Party on a platform that included opposing migration and multiculturalism. ... Liberal South Australian senator Alex Antic said One Nation's result at the state election was a reaction from voters who were never asked whether they supported "mass migration". https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-22/albanese-defends-multiculturalism-after-one-nation-swing-in-sa/106483540 |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Bailey on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 3:41pm
Immigration has definitely been a trending subject over the past year, which makes sense for the surge of O.N. votes...
But then again, who could you expect the people to vote for? - Liberal Coalition is still in a civil war with itself. - Labor has been horrible, especially financially, and is becoming increasingly unpopular. - Greens are... let's not talk about that. There are literally no other choices for voters, really. Not a shocker to see people flood to political extremes when the main parties are a mess. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:32pm Bailey wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 3:41pm:
What makes One Nation 'extreme'?? Anyone who even mildly questions the pwogwessive orthodoxies of multiculturalism, masx immigration, net zero, deindustrialisation, decolonisation, gender [your unhappy identity group here is instantly called 'extreme. Making Australia and Australians a priority is 'extreme'. If you are not parading your empathy with and compassion for every iddntity group ahead of Austealia, you are 'extreme'. People have been brow beaten into calling anything questioning, let alone opposing, the pwogwesive orthodoxies 'extreme'. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:35pm Frank wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:32pm:
Protecting rapists, for starters. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:39pm
Libs in S.A learnt the hard way by preferencing Labor rather than O.N.
Perhaps Libs in Victoria this November, should try the opposite. O.N is as extreme as Nats. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:41pm Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:39pm:
Individual voters determine where preferences ultimately go, not political parties. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:43pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:41pm:
And most of them choose to follow HTV cards. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:46pm Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:43pm:
Incorrect. Less than 50% of voters follow those stupid cards. Somewhere around 42%, from memory. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:49pm "Individual voters determine where preferences ultimately go, not political parties." So political parties influence around 50% of the preference flows. Making your above opinion incorrect ? |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:52pm Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:49pm:
My statement is 100% correct. "Individual voters determine where preferences ultimately go, not political parties." |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:56pm
Following HTV cards means the party has dictated their will over the voters.
|
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:57pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:35pm:
Anyone who even mildly questions the pwogwessive orthodoxies of multiculturalism, masx immigration, net zero, deindustrialisation, decolonisation, gender [your unhappy identity group here] is instantly called 'extreme'. Making Australia and Australians a priority is 'extreme'. If you are not parading your empathy with and compassion for every iddntity group ahead of Austealia, you are 'extreme'. People have been brow beaten into calling anything questioning, let alone opposing, the pwogwesive orthodoxies 'extreme'. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:01pm Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:56pm:
Thankfully, most voters don't follow them. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:02pm
The prime minister says the country must be "vigilant" against politicians seeking to return to a bygone era of Australia that was less accepting of migrants, following the South Australian election in which One Nation overtook the Liberal Party on a platform that included opposing migration and multiculturalism.
With just over half of the vote counted, One Nation has received about 22 per cent of the vote in SA, with the Liberals trailing behind at 19 per cent — an enormous 16.9 per cent swing against the party, almost entirely to the benefit of One Nation. One Nation's federal party proposes deporting about 75,000 migrants currently residing in Australia on overstayed visas, capping visas to 130,000 a year, and banning migration from countries "known to foster extremist ideologies". The party also opposes multiculturalism. Barnaby Joyce, who defected to One Nation last year, told Sky News this morning that if people were upset by the party's demand for assimilation, "then be upset". "When you get cultural Balkanisation, you get friction, you get heat, you get death," Mr Joyce said. "We took a long while to get over the Catholic-Protestant thing, and we don't want to go back there again. "There has got to be a form of assimilation … you have to conform with an Australian culture no matter where you come from." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-03-22/albanese-defends-multiculturalism-after-one-nation-swing-in-sa/106483540 How is any of that 'extreme'? |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:04pm Frank wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:02pm:
FFS, Barnaby is such an idiot. Australian culture is multiculturalism. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:09pm
Albanese's pulling the racist card while a majority of the country's population is under housing stress.
For Albo to jump so quickly, suggests Labor is in panic mode. This racist red herring will not work at the next election. Mass migration is a failed experiment. . |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:15pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:04pm:
That's idiotic, of course. How does Australian 'multiculturalism' differ from German, Swedish, Canadian or Irish 'multiculturalism'? Multiculturalism is an idiotic idea that has now sank to the level of a sick joke. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Bailey on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:24pm Frank wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 4:32pm:
Perhaps not 'extreme'. However, definitely more radical. A more populist party which has much stronger nationalistic views as well as being much harsher on immigration. As well as the fact that the party leader herself has blatantly attacked other political figures and people mostly based on their race/beliefs. Even if you don't think One Nation as a party may not be extreme and hold Australian values above all, you cannot argue that Pauline herself is certainly more radical and rash. Of course, the leader of the party will influence the rest of the party. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Ai_Took_Our_Jobs on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:42pm
Ahead of the Farrer byelection in NSW, Taylor is planning to announce the Coalition’s own plan to cut the migration intake. But the opposition wants to highlight the folly of reducing net migration to zero, as Hanson proposes, by warning tradespeople how badly the building sector would be hurt.
Coalition plans assault on One Nation’s credibility to avoid South Australia-style wipeout https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/coalition-plans-assault-on-one-nation-s-credibility-to-avoid-south-australia-style-wipeout-20260322-p5rmga.html |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:47pm Bailey wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:24pm:
Common sense has been rebranded as extreme and populist. Maluniskas won with 38 % of the primary vote, ON 23% - and ON is the 'populist'?? The rhetorical sleight of hand is absolutely everywhere. Racial and cultural 'diversity' is detrimental to every country. Introducing, importing, boosting it is madness. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:51pm Frank wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:15pm:
The sick joke is white supremacists like you, old boy. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 6:03pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:51pm:
You forgot to adress the question, once again, repulsive, sladerous lying idiotic creep. "I mean, it's only the lefties, the bleeding-heart lefties who don't want any talk about immigration that refer to this sort of stuff as racist. I'm really sorry that you've done that. But I presume you're a bleeding-heart lefty?" The reporter responded "no" before the press conference ended. She was lying like you always do, creep. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 4:42pm greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 22nd, 2026 at 5:04pm:
Deeply sinister, not to mention exttremely idiotic answer. Your own country of multicutural Yugoslavia was torn apart by it's constituent cultures in a bloody civil war. Even the barely distinguishable Czecks and Slovaks divorced (not as bloodily as your kind of crazy southern Slavs). barely distinguishable Russia, Ukraine, Belorus - ditto. Lebanon - ditto. Every civil war is due to the failure of 'multiculturalism'. Multiculturalism is an artificial, ideological artifice, a Frankenstein's monster, not a real-world, living culture. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Jasin on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 5:05pm
Pecca's Multicultural Australia does exist.
It's just not working and has ruined the Federal Level of our Political strata. Mommy One Nation is trying to console and gather the Federal kiddies under her wing as it all comes crashing down. As for the Aborigines? Well, it was never Multicultural - just their culture only, eh? Looks like they're gonna lose out chasing after the Golden Fleece that is now the Federal Media circus of Failure. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 5:58pm Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 5:05pm:
1100 family tribal groups each with its own separate ways - that's the culture... the original culture of division and multi-culturalism. That's why they still can't get on with anyone else. I do all right with them - we're all on the seme level here. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 24th, 2026 at 9:46am Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 5:05pm:
On Friday in Lakemba, Albanese found himself chewed up and spat out. His treatment ought to be a wake-up call to Australia’s political class. There are clearly deep problems within what was once rather wishfully described as the most harmonious multicultural society in the world. Of particular concern is the Western Sydney region, where the bulk if Australia’s Muslim population resides. In the space of a few months, its mosques have inspired Islamist gay-bashings, produced two terrorists allegedly responsible for an unspeakable slaughter of Jews and have become no-go zones for the prime minister. An encounter like last week’s would once have been unheard of in Australian politics. Something isn’t right. Australian politicians have long dismissed the crisis of integration as being a Western European problem. But even if they finally recognise that this is no longer the case, it will take a far stronger and more principled leader than Anthony Albanese to confront it. Until then, Islamic sectarianism will continue to flourish on Australian soil. https://www.spiked-online.com/2026/03/23/albaneses-appeasement-of-militant-islam-has-come-back-to-bite-him/ |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Vic on Mar 24th, 2026 at 2:34pm Frank wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 9:46am:
"it will take a far stronger and more principled leader …”. I don’t think we have such a being in the current or future politicians. |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Jasin on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:07pm
You are right VIC 👍
Now who would want to be a Political Prime Minister in Australia? When it is now the position of all that is weak and Criminal. While Trump is proving that American political leadership is strong and justful. The tide has turned now VIC. The Australian 'political' people are no longer the Criminals (Convicts). The position of PM is now the ELECTRIC CHAIR ⚡⚡⚡. Taylor & Canavan are like two Aussie blokes that work together like 'mates' in Coalition and they probably DONT WANT TO WIN, for fear that they might turn into a Gay couple. ;D The position of Political Leader ship in Australia is now CURSED. It's all about Positives and Negatives with electricity, isn't it? Politics in USA (via Trump, not Biden) is Positive at the top, but Negative at the bottom. Australia is the 'culturally backwards' reverse. PM is the Negative charge. The Australian 'political' (not Artistic) People at the bottom are the Positive. We are all FREE‼️ Our Convict chains are gone. The real Criminal is the Prime Minister. ...and hasn't Anus Albo lived up to it. ;) Who knows. Maybe it will be like the movie Highlander on the world stage where the President of the USA says "There can be only One!" ...and chops our Prime Minister's head off. ;D during a Summit Meeting? I did say that the Federal Level is a sinking ship, a Golden Fleece. It's attracting all the LOSERS to it like Mozzies to a Zapper. Taylor & Canavan would be wise to feign interest to win, unless they do intend to turn Aussie Mateship (coalition) into a GAY AFFAIR ;) Like I said. Australian Politics will shatter into many small independent nations. The positive power is at the bottom and among the many. Power to the common people of the Common Wealth for all. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Jasin on Mar 24th, 2026 at 4:14pm
Oh. As for the British representative - the Governor General❓
Well that role's future will be much like a Swagman. Oh how the world turns ;) |
|
Title: Re: Australia's Migration Policies Post by Frank on Mar 24th, 2026 at 8:20pm Vic wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 2:34pm:
That is the malaise. Uniparty. That is why Trump, Hanson, Farage, Le Pen, Canavan, are needed. The uniparty sclerosis must be crushed, one way or another. We cant go on with the gillardruddscomoalboduttonalbo bollocks much longer. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |