flat earth total fruitcake

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1591967918542237

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1591967918542237

Put him in a mental asylum.

You just know that he voted for Trump.

And Bobby, speaking of mental asylums - I love how Trump confuses seeking asylum with mental asylums.

When he talks about immigrants coming from South America he says that they've been released from mental asylums.

He doesn't understand what seeking asylum means, and so he just assumes they're inmates from mental asylums.

Has there ever been a more ignorant human being on this planet?

Which reminds me of his confusion with incursion and excursion.

His minders told him not to use the word 'war' when talking about his illegal invasion of Iran.

They said he should refer to it as an incursion.

But he doesn't know what incursion means, so he says excursion instead.

"Iran is just a little excursion we went on"

;D

There has never been a dumber person on this planet ... ever.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 20^th, 2026 at 6:51pm:

You just know that he voted for Trump. And Bobby, speaking of mental asylums - I love how Trump confuses seeking asylum with mental asylums. When he talks about immigrants coming from South America he says that they've been released from mental asylums. He doesn't understand what seeking asylum means, and so he just assumes they're inmates from mental asylums. Has there ever been a more ignorant human being on this planet? Which reminds me of his confusion with incursion and excursion. His minders told them not to use the word 'war' when talking about his illegal invasion of Iran. They said he should refer to it as an incursion. But he doesn't know what incursion means, so he says excursion instead. "Iran is just a little excursion we went on" ;D There has never been a dumber person on this planet ... ever.

Nahh -  Trump could explain Euler's identity - he's that smart.

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1773913209/0#12

Bobby. wrote on Mar 20^th, 2026 at 6:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 20th, 2026 at 6:51pm: You just know that he voted for Trump. And Bobby, speaking of mental asylums - I love how Trump confuses seeking asylum with mental asylums. When he talks about immigrants coming from South America he says that they've been released from mental asylums. He doesn't understand what seeking asylum means, and so he just assumes they're inmates from mental asylums. Has there ever been a more ignorant human being on this planet? Which reminds me of his confusion with incursion and excursion. His minders told them not to use the word 'war' when talking about his illegal invasion of Iran. They said he should refer to it as an incursion. But he doesn't know what incursion means, so he says excursion instead. "Iran is just a little excursion we went on" ;D There has never been a dumber person on this planet ... ever. Nahh -  Trump could explain Euler's identity - he's that smart. https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1773913209/0#12

During a solar eclipse, he looked directly into the sun.

https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/7xvTswjFfQjs7Qhak5TGn62jTU0=/630x394/media/img/posts/2017/08/RTS1CPFG/original.jpg

Still better than picking his nose among world leaders and sniffing little girls hair, asking 15 year old girls about their sex life and dry humping Hillary ;D

I think most people steal a glance to the eclipse at some time in their lives.
Maybe not you, because you're a good little boy aren't you. ;)

::)

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 20^th, 2026 at 6:59pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 20th, 2026 at 6:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 20th, 2026 at 6:51pm: You just know that he voted for Trump. And Bobby, speaking of mental asylums - I love how Trump confuses seeking asylum with mental asylums. When he talks about immigrants coming from South America he says that they've been released from mental asylums. He doesn't understand what seeking asylum means, and so he just assumes they're inmates from mental asylums. Has there ever been a more ignorant human being on this planet? Which reminds me of his confusion with incursion and excursion. His minders told them not to use the word 'war' when talking about his illegal invasion of Iran. They said he should refer to it as an incursion. But he doesn't know what incursion means, so he says excursion instead. "Iran is just a little excursion we went on" ;D There has never been a dumber person on this planet ... ever. Nahh -  Trump could explain Euler's identity - he's that smart. https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1773913209/0#12 During a solar eclipse, he looked directly into the sun. https://cdn.theatlantic.com/thumbor/7xvTswjFfQjs7Qhak5TGn62jTU0=/630x394/media/img/posts/2017/08/RTS1CPFG/original.jpg

Because Trump is the Sun King.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NN05cPMkRBo

Jasin wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2026 at 1:13pm:

Still better than picking his nose among world leaders and sniffing little girls hair, asking 15 year old girls about their sex life and dry humping Hillary ;D I think most people steal a glance to the eclipse at some time in their lives. Maybe not you, because you're a good little boy aren't you. ;) ::)

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff.

During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2026 at 2:04pm:

Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 1:13pm: Still better than picking his nose among world leaders and sniffing little girls hair, asking 15 year old girls about their sex life and dry humping Hillary ;D I think most people steal a glance to the eclipse at some time in their lives. Maybe not you, because you're a good little boy aren't you. ;) ::) 10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2026 at 2:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 2:04pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 1:13pm: Still better than picking his nose among world leaders and sniffing little girls hair, asking 15 year old girls about their sex life and dry humping Hillary ;D I think most people steal a glance to the eclipse at some time in their lives. Maybe not you, because you're a good little boy aren't you. ;) ::) 10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B. 11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B.

During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a)

Proven lies from a redundant corrupt Leftism relic Court system on the take.

You're a sad loser indeed. Hope you take all that to your grave you neurotic imbecile.  ;D

Such posts have gone 'flat' 😆😂🤣

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23^rd, 2026 at 2:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 2:14pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 2:04pm: Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2026 at 1:13pm: Still better than picking his nose among world leaders and sniffing little girls hair, asking 15 year old girls about their sex life and dry humping Hillary ;D I think most people steal a glance to the eclipse at some time in their lives. Maybe not you, because you're a good little boy aren't you. ;) ::) 10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties. On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B. 11. Immediately following this rape, Defendant Trump threatened Plaintiff that, were she ever to reveal any of the details of the sexual and physical abuse of her by Defendant Trump, Plaintiff and her family would be physically harmed if not killed. Exhs. A and B. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a)

And the cultists turn a blind eye.
The american legal system turns a blind eye

This is but one indicator america is a corrupt, ammoral, violent, criminal country.

Says the TDS CULTISTS  ;D

There was no petrol shortage when earth was flat !!!

Sprintcyclist wrote on Mar 20^th, 2026 at 6:10pm:

flat earth total fruitcake https://www.facebook.com/reel/1591967918542237 https://www.facebook.com/reel/1591967918542237

Light?

A Scientist will prove that the Earth is NOT the centre of the Universe.
And they will be right.

A Wise person will say the Earth IS the centre of OUR universe.
And they will be right too.

So it is, with the Flat Earth. That the Scientific mind refuses to see what is right in front of them.

I know from where I'm sitting right now. The earth looks flat to me. ;)

You're confusing science with philosophy and then deliberately blurring the lines between the two.

It's a classic flat-earther tactic, so you're not the first person to do it.

Nothing to do with 'philosophy'.
That's your mistake right there.

The Flat Earth is as much a Reality as the global sphere Reality.
Just like the Earth being the centre of OUR universe is also a true reality.

It is the flaw of the intellectual snob, that he/she believes there can be only ONE right answer.

Au contraire, I never said there was only one right answer, I said you were conflating the two.

From a philosophical standpoint, the Earth can be considered the centre of our universe. However, from a scientific perspective, as we currently understand it, the universe has no centre.

Similarly, from a philosophical point of view, the Earth may appear flat to the average observer. From that limited frame of reference, one could argue that it is flat. Unless someone has experienced sufficient altitude to observe the curvature directly, that perception holds.

However, through mathematics, direct observation, and theory, we have conclusively demonstrated that, from a scientific standpoint, the Earth is not flat.

Both statements can exist in their respective contexts, but they are not equally valid in describing reality.
The issue arises when the two are conflated, when a statement about perception is presented as a statement about objective reality.

That’s where the argument collapses.

No amount of insults will change that.

Your first two words.

You're a French Poof intellectual snob.

Jasin wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 7:36pm:

Your first two words. You're a French Poof intellectual snob.

A few French, Greek or Latin words always impresses the peasants.   :)

Meh.  ::)

Relying on OLD French, Greek, Latin or other Euro centricities fails to impress me, especially when they claim to be 'Proud' Australian.  ;D

I would only say Germany has advanced in Europe, but they paid a price for it.

Jasin wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 10:25pm:

Meh.  ::) Relying on OLD French, Greek, Latin or other Euro centricities fails to impress me, especially when they claim to be 'Proud' Australian.  ;D I would only say Germany has advanced in Europe, but they paid a price for it.

When I use French words people get annoyed so I don't.    :-[

PK used them to feel culturally superior... as a 'proud' australian ;D

Jasin wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 11:16pm:

PK used them to feel culturally superior... as a 'proud' australian ;D

Il est un académique.

Jasin wrote on Mar 24^th, 2026 at 7:36pm:

Your first two words. You're a French Poof intellectual snob.

If you're going to accuse me of being an intellectual snob, why not lean into it?

The point, which you've quite deliberately sidestepped in favour of cheap personal attacks, is straightforward: you are absolutely entitled to your perceptions, to your interpretations, to whatever grand narrative you construct from what you think you're observing. That's not in dispute.

Where you come unstuck is in pretending that your perception is synonymous with reality itself. It isn't. Reality exists independent of you, whether you grasp it or not, and conflating the two is a fundamental category error.

This is the dividing line between a scientific outlook and a purely philosophical indulgence. Science exists precisely because human perception is limited, biased, and often wrong, so it builds methods to test, falsify, and correct those perceptions against an external reality.

Take a simple example. From sea level, with the naked eye, the Earth can appear flat depending on visibility. Fine, grant that premise. From your limited observational standpoint, that may well be how it presents.

But does that make the Earth flat?

To you, perhaps. In reality, demonstrably not.

And this is exactly where your thinking consistently collapses, particularly in your politics. You elevate your selective observations to the status of fact, filter out anything that challenges them, and then point back to your own constructed view as "evidence" that you were right all along. It's not analysis, it's a closed feedback loop, a self-reinforcing system designed to protect your beliefs from scrutiny.

So it's hardly surprising you struggle with this distinction here as well.

how many nukes are needed to make flat earth fruitcake?

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 9:57am:

Jasin wrote on Mar 24th, 2026 at 7:36pm: Your first two words. You're a French Poof intellectual snob. If you're going to accuse me of being an intellectual snob, why not lean into it? The point, which you've quite deliberately sidestepped in favour of cheap personal attacks, is straightforward: you are absolutely entitled to your perceptions, to your interpretations, to whatever grand narrative you construct from what you think you're observing. That's not in dispute. Where you come unstuck is in pretending that your perception is synonymous with reality itself. It isn't. Reality exists independent of you, whether you grasp it or not, and conflating the two is a fundamental category error. This is the dividing line between a scientific outlook and a purely philosophical indulgence. Science exists precisely because human perception is limited, biased, and often wrong, so it builds methods to test, falsify, and correct those perceptions against an external reality. Take a simple example. From sea level, with the naked eye, the Earth can appear flat depending on visibility. Fine, grant that premise. From your limited observational standpoint, that may well be how it presents. But does that make the Earth flat? To you, perhaps. In reality, demonstrably not. And this is exactly where your thinking consistently collapses, particularly in your politics. You elevate your selective observations to the status of fact, filter out anything that challenges them, and then point back to your own constructed view as "evidence" that you were right all along. It's not analysis, it's a closed feedback loop, a self-reinforcing system designed to protect your beliefs from scrutiny. So it's hardly surprising you struggle with this distinction here as well.

What I've demonstrated and what you've reaffirmed is that you don't use both sides of your brain and accept BOTH as being in absolute in their justified reality of truth.
In essence, you are a Half-Wit.  ;D

Whatever safe space you need to craft for yourself.

The earth looks FLAT from where I'm sitting and I also know that is round like a beachball all too. Well, it bulges at the equator - so not a perfect spheroid.

Kinda stuffs your Lefty argument and condemnation against Flat Earthers.

I win. You lose.
Bend the knee and apologise and I promise you'll be forgiven by Bobby.

Jasin wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 5:42pm:

The earth looks FLAT from where I'm sitting and I also know that is round like a beachball all too. Well, it bulges at the equator - so not a perfect spheroid. Kinda stuffs your Lefty argument and condemnation against Flat Earthers. I win. You lose. Bend the knee and apologise and I promise you'll be forgiven by Bobby.

You've just admitted it looks flat, but it isn't.

We actually agree. 

You're so desperate for a win, you can't even see that this wasn't even a contest, and we found common ground by acknowledging what is real.

Too bad you're incapable of doing this in other topics.

If you wanna suck dick, go ask Pecca at your Troll Cave PA with all the other losers banned from here.
I just said "bend the knee", but you always wanna take it a step further.

Now if you had a flat head to rest my beer? I might reconsider though.

Jasin wrote on Mar 25^th, 2026 at 5:42pm:

The earth looks FLAT from where I'm sitting and I also know that is round like a beachball all too. Well, it bulges at the equator - so not a perfect spheroid. Kinda stuffs your Lefty argument and condemnation against Flat Earthers. I win. You lose. Bend the knee and apologise and I promise you'll be forgiven by Bobby.

All are forgiven

and so it is

acccording to the divine plan

namaste

Jasin wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 11:47am:

If you wanna suck dick, go ask Pecca at your Troll Cave PA with all the other losers banned from here. I just said "bend the knee", but you always wanna take it a step further. Now if you had a flat head to rest my beer? I might reconsider though.

Interesting. We finally land on a point of agreement and instead of engaging with it, you immediately pivot back to conflict.

At some point you might want to reflect on why that is, because defaulting to hostility the moment consensus appears isn't a sign of strength, it's an inability to operate outside of opposition.

Call it habit, call it impulse, call it whatever helps you sleep at night, but it derails the discussion all the same.

No matter, this is a safe space of discussion, so long as you cut out the personal attacks.

I started with agreement upon both and you brought conflict.
You ended with agreement and I conflict.

You got what you deserved.

Jasin wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 12:34pm:

I started with agreement upon both and you brought conflict. You ended with agreement and I conflict. You got what you deserved.

Got what I deserved? It's a discussion mate...

Why so hostile, what is wrong with you?

This is a Telecom recording.
The number you called is no longer connected...

Run and hide then, your choice.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 2:49pm:

Run and hide then, your choice.

He's not about to change his MO now.

Same goes for Frank and aquascoot.

Leftists support these flat earth nutjobs


Quote:

and after that He spread out the earth He made it flat for it had been created before the heaven but without having been spread out; https://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=79&tAyahNo=30&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0&LanguageId=2

Saudis have the death penalty for muslims who leave Islam and become atheist they chop your head off in chop chop square

---