Islamic community group Taha Humanity Association's grant cancelled amid 'social cohesion concerns' :o

Good. Labor should not have been funding Islamic extremism in the first place.

I predict a terrorist attack by Mussos very soon.

I predict the sun will rise tomorrow.

I predict the homa-sexual relations between Starmer and Macron will appear on the Woman's Weekly and prove why Great Britain can't hold a fart.

freediver wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 6:51pm:

Good. Labor should not have been funding Islamic extremism in the first place.

Note that not all Muslims are extremists, eg Labor ministers Husic and  Aly.

It took the assassination of Khamenei to reveal his extremist worshippers in Oz....who in Iran shout "death to Israel" because the UN confiscated Muslim land to anable recreation of Israel - ironically one of the first acts of the the new 'peace keeping' UN supposed to "save mankind from the scourge of war."

(Note: whereas peace-seeking Israeli  PM Rabin was murdered by a Jewish OT "Promised Land" nut-job, Khamenei was murdered by the "infidel" Trump-Netanyahu axis preaching "righteous war").


Oops - it's back to the drawing board..... or back to 'might is right' and the insanity of war, if that's what you prefer.   

Quote:

Note that not all Muslims are extremists, eg Labor ministers Husic and  Aly.

What is it about their views that make them "not extremist"?

Or is it more a case of, if Labor gives you money, you are not an extremist, or if Labor hands you a seat in parliament to suck up to Muslim voters and woke morons, you are not an extremist.

Where does 'extremist' belief start? Accepting the Koran as a final and unalterable word of god for all eternity is as *ucking extreme as possible. And all practicing Muslims accept that.

If you want reduced immigration and next to none from Muslim countries, you are 'extreme right'.  If you want to globalise the intifada, regard all infidels as unclean, wont shake hands with your lady principal at your graduation becuase she isa woman  - you are a 'moderate Muslim'.

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 4^th, 2026 at 6:19pm:

Islamic community group Taha Humanity Association's grant cancelled amid 'social cohesion concerns' :o

Why are taxpayers funding any religion let alone the worst one?

Last census showed nearly 40% of us have no religion.

If muslims need more money they can pass the plate around at their mosques

freediver wrote on Mar 5^th, 2026 at 1:50pm:

Quote: Note that not all Muslims are extremists, eg Labor ministers Husic and  Aly. What is it about their views that make them "not extremist"? Or is it more a case of, if Labor gives you money, you are not an extremist, or if Labor hands you a seat in parliament to suck up to Muslim voters and woke morons, you are not an extremist.

Poor FD,  his ideologically incapacitated brain causes him to revert to asking inane questions, even after the causes of Islamist extremism have been explained to him.

Husic and Aly are enlightened/moderate Muslims who don't preach or practice murder, unlike the Jewish nut-job who murdered his own Israeli PM, Rabin, who sought peace with Palestinians by implementing UN resolutions 181 and 242.

Now of course:

(Daily Mail)

[b]Cleric's fatwa to avenge Khamenei prompts fears of sleeper cell and lone wolf attacks[/i]

That cleric is an extremist.

And apparently a shooting incident in Texas, the day after Khamenei's assassination,  was related to the fatwa.

And so it goes.

You can't kill 1.5 billion Muslims, an alternative course of action is required....

But don't ask FD...

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 5^th, 2026 at 2:58pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 4th, 2026 at 6:19pm: Islamic community group Taha Humanity Association's grant cancelled amid 'social cohesion concerns' :o Why are taxpayers funding any religion let alone the worst one? Last census showed nearly 40% of us have no religion. If muslims need more money they can pass the plate around at their mosques

Probably more than the Victorian CWA got.

thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 5^th, 2026 at 5:31pm:

freediver wrote on Mar 5th, 2026 at 1:50pm: Quote: Note that not all Muslims are extremists, eg Labor ministers Husic and  Aly. What is it about their views that make them "not extremist"? Or is it more a case of, if Labor gives you money, you are not an extremist, or if Labor hands you a seat in parliament to suck up to Muslim voters and woke morons, you are not an extremist. Poor FD,  his ideologically incapacitated brain causes him to revert to asking inane questions, even after the causes of Islamist extremism have been explained to him. Husic and Aly are enlightened/moderate Muslims who don't preach or practice murder, unlike the Jewish nut-job who murdered his own Israeli PM, Rabin, who sought peace with Palestinians by implementing UN resolutions 181 and 242. Now of course: (Daily Mail) [b]Cleric's fatwa to avenge Khamenei prompts fears of sleeper cell and lone wolf attacks[/i] That cleric is an extremist. And apparently a shooting incident in Texas, the day after Khamenei's assassination,  was related to the fatwa. And so it goes. You can't kill 1.5 billion Muslims, an alternative course of action is required.... But don't ask FD...

I am asking you what it is about their views that make them "not an extremist". Only an idiot would try to judge a person's views from things they do not do or say, and there is never any shortage of woke idiots projecting their own views onto Muslims.

Or is refraining from actually murdering people as high as you are willing to set the bar for "not an extremist" when it comes to Muslims?

If I told you a neoNazi was not an extremist because I could find no evidence of him murdering someone, would you accept that argument, or is it only Muslims who can be considered moderates so long as they refrain from murdering?

freediver wrote on Mar 5^th, 2026 at 8:35pm:

If I told you a neoNazi was not an extremist because I could find no evidence of him murdering someone, would you accept that argument, or is it only Muslims who can be considered moderates so long as they refrain from murdering?

:)

freediver wrote on Mar 5^th, 2026 at 8:35pm:

thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 5th, 2026 at 5:31pm: freediver wrote on Mar 5th, 2026 at 1:50pm: Quote: Note that not all Muslims are extremists, eg Labor ministers Husic and  Aly. What is it about their views that make them "not extremist"? Or is it more a case of, if Labor gives you money, you are not an extremist, or if Labor hands you a seat in parliament to suck up to Muslim voters and woke morons, you are not an extremist. Poor FD,  his ideologically incapacitated brain causes him to revert to asking inane questions, even after the causes of Islamist extremism have been explained to him. Husic and Aly are enlightened/moderate Muslims who don't preach or practice murder, unlike the Jewish nut-job who murdered his own Israeli PM, Rabin, who sought peace with Palestinians by implementing UN resolutions 181 and 242. Now of course: (Daily Mail) Cleric's fatwa to avenge Khamenei prompts fears of sleeper cell and lone wolf attacks That cleric is an extremist. And apparently a shooting incident in Texas, the day after Khamenei's assassination,  was related to the fatwa. And so it goes. You can't kill 1.5 billion Muslims, an alternative course of action is required.... But don't ask FD... I am asking you what it is about their views that make them "not an extremist".

I told you, but your ideologically incapacited brain demands I explain my explanation.

I'll take it slowly - as I often must do in your case.   

Religious extremists  - like the Jewish nut-job who murdered Rabin - take ancient scripture as word for word 'gospel'  truth, and hence will kill for their religion.

Religious moderates regard their religion as revealing the path to the 'True God',  hence the 'religion of peace' narrative based on the many inspiring passages - alongside the dross - found in all scripture: moderates ignore the passages authorising genocide, murder, or capital punishmnet.

When I pointed that out to an educated Moslem I once met,  he told me "you can't tell people their 'Book' is incorrect".....

And Malcom Turnbull once said "Islam is one of the great world religions".

Moderates.

Still beyond your comprehension?


Quote:

Only an idiot would try to judge a person's views from things they do not do or say

FD in full flight: he turns the proposition upside down and asks an inane question.
One can judge people - who are not scriptural literalists -  from what they say and do. eg "islam is a religion of Peace", and act accordingly, ie, live and let live.  

Is Israel as bad as Iran?

Well...Neytanyahu IS wanted by the ICJ for examination, while many Moslem iranians are glad to see the end of the extremists ruling Iran.


Quote:

Or is refraining from actually murdering people as high as you are willing to set the bar for "not an extremist" when it comes to Muslims?

When it comes to followers of ANY religion, that's the redline. 


Quote:

If I told you a neoNazi was not an extremist because I could find no evidence of him murdering someone,

Your error: an individual Neo nazi might be capable of murder for the 'cause', most aren't. 

All fair-minded people have to tolerate Israel's botched creation (by the UN)  on confiscated Muslim land because they must, because protest changes little in the short term (and no assurances for the longterm),  given the failure of international law to implement UN res 181.

I see that was far too complicated and went way over your head. Instead of trying to explain why you think their views are moderate, can you start by explaining what specific views of theirs you are talking about?

freediver wrote on Mar 6^th, 2026 at 2:56pm:

I see that was far too complicated and went way over your head. Instead of trying to explain why you think their views are moderate, can you start by explaining what specific views of theirs you are talking about?

Well, noting you are apparently too dimwitted to actually address the points I made in the post to which you imagined you were replying,  ie religious extremists, unlike moderates,  are capable of murder for their religion;  I will  nevertheless address your question re "specific views".

...but I have already told you: extremists view every word of gospel.... as 'gospel', and can decide to act on those views (based on scriptural literalism),  especially if "infidels" - arbitrarily in their eyes -  confiscate muslim land, or attack/disrespect the Koran.

Meanwhile violent, murderous, Jewish extremist nut-jobs are relishing it all, laughing at the international community which does nothing to stop the expanding illegal settlements in E. Jerusalem and the WB. 

Deplorable. 

Quote:

I will  nevertheless address your question re "specific views".

I am waiting. What are they?

When you declare Husic and Aly to be moderates, do you make this pronouncement on the basis that you have no clue at all what their views actually are, so you fill in all the gaps in your knowledge with little fantasies, just like the ABC does when it gives millions of dollars in taxpayer funds to Islamic groups?