Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1771601897

Message started by MattE on Feb 21st, 2026 at 1:38am

Title: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by MattE on Feb 21st, 2026 at 1:38am
BREAKING NEWS:

Supreme Court rules that Trump’s sweeping emergency tariffs are illegal

By John Fritze
20 February 2026

CNN

https://youtu.be/B4PmR-bPMFk

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that President Donald Trump violated federal law when he unilaterally imposed sweeping tariffs across the globe, a striking loss for the White House on an issue that has been central to the president’s foreign policy and economic agenda.

The decision is arguably the most important loss the second Trump administration has sustained at the conservative Supreme Court, which last year repeatedly sided with the president in a series of emergency rulings on immigration, the firing of the leaders of independent agencies and deep cuts to government spending.

The ruling was 6 for the majority a 3 for the dissent.

MAJORITY:

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Justice Elena Kagan
Justice Neil M. Gorsuch
Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson

DISSENT:

Justice Clarence Thomas
Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh
Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

FULL STORY: https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/20/politics/supreme-court-tariffs

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by A Proud Gay Aussie on Feb 21st, 2026 at 1:59am
A nuanced ruling, but he lost.
What country will he bomb to take his rage out on?
Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent, of course.

And now what? The global economy is already regrouping without the USA. Can America build all those connections back up again, and Trump isn't interested in that—he's only interested in lining his own pockets through theft of taxpayer money and blackmail of corporations and other nations. I'm glad the SC ruled this way, but little will change.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Sprintcyclist on Feb 21st, 2026 at 4:06am

A Proud Gay Aussie wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 1:59am:
A nuanced ruling, but he lost.
What country will he bomb to take his rage out on?
Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh dissent, of course.

And now what? The global economy is already regrouping without the USA. Can America build all those connections back up again, and Trump isn't interested in that—he's only interested in lining his own pockets through theft of taxpayer money and blackmail of corporations and other nations. I'm glad the SC ruled this way, but little will change.



Quote:
......    Can America build all those connections back up again,      ...........


no. america now shows sovereign risk. it is a flawed openly corrupt violent unintelligent society.
the world wants to have little to do with it.
it operates only 8 % of the worlds trade, the other 92 % will operate well without it
china now pays 50% of their iron ore bill to aussie in their own currency. the rest of the world will do this too.



Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Marla on Feb 21st, 2026 at 4:57am
Now some prices will drop but not soon.

Watch ol orange F A T T Y takes credit for the problem he caused.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by aquascoot on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:00am
Trump understands the system better then the legal intellectuals.
It's the benefit he had from years of grinding it out on the tough streets of Manhattan whilst the lawyers sipped thier lattes.


What are the supreme Court going to do?
Call in an airstrike on Mar El lago? ;D
Call up the military?.

The big fella can do what he likes.
He will be dead soon, so let him enjoy the encore to a very interesting life, something the leftie intellectual never experienced.
Now, back to your crusty keyboards lefties and recognize your inferior status

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:57am
'Queensland has tough laws about participating in criminal organisations and organising, planning, facilitating, supporting, or otherwise conspiring to engage in, serious criminal activity.'

There is no suggestion that Mr A Quascoot is a criminal or has anything to do with organised crime. Any such accusations will be dealt with by AFP, ICE or US Marine Corps.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 21st, 2026 at 10:40am

aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:00am:
The big fella can do what he likes.
He will be dead soon, ...


Yes, every cloud has a silver lining   :)

The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping emergency tariffs on Friday, a significant decision that could redirect the course of the administration’s economic and foreign policy agenda.

The 6-3 decision, which included both conservative and liberal justices in the majority, had the potential to reset the relationship between a White House that has repeatedly pushed legal boundaries and a Supreme Court that has in case after case blessed those efforts since Trump returned to power.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by MattE on Feb 21st, 2026 at 12:07pm

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 21st, 2026 at 12:18pm

MattE wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 12:07pm:


Jesus, he's such a little cry-baby.



Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Sprintcyclist on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:15pm
same as his whole life, one crime after another

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:53pm
It seems he can be a dictator to an extent without officially being one, just  as Israel can take the West Bank without making it official.  Putin plays the same game. It's salami-slicing off democracy.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Carl D on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:06pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 10:40am:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:00am:
The big fella can do what he likes.
He will be dead soon, ...


Yes, every cloud has a silver lining   :)

The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping emergency tariffs on Friday, a significant decision that could redirect the course of the administration’s economic and foreign policy agenda.

The 6-3 decision, which included both conservative and liberal justices in the majority, had the potential to reset the relationship between a White House that has repeatedly pushed legal boundaries and a Supreme Court that has in case after case blessed those efforts since Trump returned to power.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrB03e1WqH4

The Grifters - Episode 41 "Dead, Pumped, and Distracted"

Mr. Newberger's AI Funnies


Quote:
Trump is dead.
…or is he just dreaming at the Board of Peace?

Episode 41 of The Grifters spirals through a week of absolute chaos:

• Trump is an embarrassment at Board of Peace
• RFK Jr. & Kid Rock launch The Measles Workout
• A giant Trump banner goes up at the DOJ
• Don Jr. & Eric react to a truly unhinged Palantir moment
• Kristi Noem unveils Luxury Deportations™
• Pete Hegseth preaches peace… then takes orders to bomb Iran
• And somehow—it all distracts from Epstein

Nothing is real. Everything is content.


:)

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm
Trump announces devastating new global tariff as he hits out at ‘deeply disappointing’ Supreme Court ruling


President Donald Trump has this morning imposed a devastating 10 per cent tariff on all imports into the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature economic policy.



The conservative-majority top court ruled six-three that a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act(IEEPA) Mr Trump has relied on “does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.”


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.


The ruling did not impact sector-specific duties Mr Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminum and various other goods. Several government probes which could lead to more sectoral tariffs remain in the works.





Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:39pm

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Trump announces devastating new global tariff as he hits out at ‘deeply disappointing’ Supreme Court ruling


President Donald Trump has this morning imposed a devastating 10 per cent tariff on all imports into the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature economic policy.



The conservative-majority top court ruled six-three that a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act(IEEPA) Mr Trump has relied on “does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.”


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.


The ruling did not impact sector-specific duties Mr Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminum and various other goods. Several government probes which could lead to more sectoral tariffs remain in the works.


Who pays the tariff, Frank?


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Sprintcyclist on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:49pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Trump announces devastating new global tariff as he hits out at ‘deeply disappointing’ Supreme Court ruling


President Donald Trump has this morning imposed a devastating 10 per cent tariff on all imports into the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature economic policy.



The conservative-majority top court ruled six-three that a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act(IEEPA) Mr Trump has relied on “does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.”


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.


The ruling did not impact sector-specific duties Mr Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminum and various other goods. Several government probes which could lead to more sectoral tariffs remain in the works.


Who pays the tariff, Frank?


trump is worse than stupid

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:55pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:49pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Trump announces devastating new global tariff as he hits out at ‘deeply disappointing’ Supreme Court ruling


President Donald Trump has this morning imposed a devastating 10 per cent tariff on all imports into the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature economic policy.



The conservative-majority top court ruled six-three that a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act(IEEPA) Mr Trump has relied on “does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.”


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.


The ruling did not impact sector-specific duties Mr Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminum and various other goods. Several government probes which could lead to more sectoral tariffs remain in the works.


Who pays the tariff, Frank?


trump is worse than stupid


In all honesty, I have never seen a stupider adult in all my life.

Despite his advisors telling him every day that tariffs are paid by the US importers, he still believes that they're paid by the foreign exporters.

How does someone that stupid become POTUS?


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Mortdooley on Feb 21st, 2026 at 9:09pm
You wouldn't want the American Companies to be able to compete on a level playing field now would you? After all, Jimmy Carter said he was moving America from an industrial economy to a service one and it seems to have happened.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 21st, 2026 at 9:33pm
'Two tiny, remote Antarctic outposts populated by penguins and seals are among the obscure places targeted by the Trump administration's new tariffs.

Heard and McDonald Islands - a territory which sits 4,000km (2,485 miles) south-west of Australia - are only accessible via a seven-day boat trip from Perth, and haven't been visited by humans in almost a decade.

Australian trade minister Don Farrell told the ABC that the tariffs were "clearly a mistake".

"Poor old penguins, I don't know what they did to Trump, but, look, I think it's an indication, to be honest with you, that this was a rushed process.'

Penguin prices are now well above US disposable income.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Dnarever on Feb 21st, 2026 at 9:48pm

Quote:
U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL


Not like it was a close call or contriversial or in question.

Tarriffs are the responsibility of congress an area where The president has no responsibility.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 21st, 2026 at 10:02pm
Shooting Minnesota people is not a very nice thing for a president.
But he owns ICE. His face owns the department of Justice. He owns judges, Gaza, Venezuela, Epstein files and Pam Bondi.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 21st, 2026 at 10:38pm

aquascoot wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 6:00am:
Trump understands the system better then the legal intellectuals.
It's the benefit he had from years of grinding it out on the tough streets of Manhattan whilst the lawyers sipped thier lattes.


What are the supreme Court going to do?
Call in an airstrike on Mar El lago? ;D
Call up the military?.

The big fella can do what he likes.
He will be dead soon, so let him enjoy the encore to a very interesting life, something the leftie intellectual never experienced.
Now, back to your crusty keyboards lefties and recognize your inferior status


Oh? How?

Now, nobody has to pay tariffs. The lower courts take over from here.

If Customs demand cash at the border, they can be told to go get fucked.

And there, just like that, goes your DL's entire economic agenda - poof!

Into the dark of night.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 21st, 2026 at 10:42pm

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Trump announces devastating new global tariff as he hits out at ‘deeply disappointing’ Supreme Court ruling


President Donald Trump has this morning imposed a devastating 10 per cent tariff on all imports into the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down his signature economic policy.



The conservative-majority top court ruled six-three that a 1977 law known as the International Emergency Economic Powers Act(IEEPA) Mr Trump has relied on “does not authorize the president to impose tariffs.”


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.


The ruling did not impact sector-specific duties Mr Trump separately imposed on imports of steel, aluminum and various other goods. Several government probes which could lead to more sectoral tariffs remain in the works.


A mere delaying tactic, as every schoolboy knows. Congress will need to legislate any new taxes from here on in.

This was your DL's last executive order.

Enjoy!

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Marla on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:11am

Mortdooley wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 9:09pm:
You wouldn't want the American Companies to be able to compete on a level playing field now would you? After all, Jimmy Carter said he was moving America from an industrial economy to a service one and it seems to have happened.




:DThe Texuuus educational system :D

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Marla on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
[size=14]


Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:58am
"The actual numbers that we would have to pay back if, for any reason, the Supreme Court were to rule against the United States of America on Tariffs, would be Hundreds of Billions of Dollars," said Trump in his post. Adding, "We are talking about Trillions of Dollars! It would be a complete mess, and almost impossible for our Country to pay."

A trillion is hundreds of billions at 1,000%. It's great big enormous. Xi and Canada can pay it. The tariffs will be great again. An impossible mess and there will be $2000 for each MAGA or not.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:18am
We can imagine the problems for US industry in wildly swinging tariff levels. Plans for US expanded-production plant are also as floppy as Trump's whims which expire in under 3 years. Trump is a trade deficit.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by aquascoot on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:59am
Inflation in the USA is lower then in Australia.
Maybe donny should send albo an email with some advice.


Now that donny is not able to carry out his plan, if things turn to crap. He can blame the courts and unpatriotic leftie intellectuals.
Hence he wins either way.

I think it's a smart move by the big boy 👦

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 8:25am
'The labor market is also cooling. Annual job growth in 2025 was revised down to 181,000, one of the slowest years in a decade.'

Go Donny go.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Marla on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:15am

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.



Still has to go through the Congress, dumbass

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Carl D on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:
Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.


Might take him a while to get back to you with that, Greg.

I suspect he's still trying to work out how Trump is going to reduce drug prices by up to 1,400%.

Maybe aquascoot can help?

;D

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 10:27am

Carl D wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 10:25am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:
Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.


Might take him a while to get back to you with that, Greg.

I suspect he's still trying to work out how Trump is going to reduce drug prices by up to 1,400%.

Maybe aquascoot can help?

;D


Yeah, still no answer on that one   ;D

TRUMP: “You know, we’ve cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500%. I don’t mean 50%, I mean 14 — 1,500%.”

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:32pm

aquascoot wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:59am:
Inflation in the USA is lower then in Australia.
Maybe donny should send albo an email with some advice.


Just so. He can advise Albo to let the RBA raise interest rates without pressing fake charges on the chair.

That could work, no?

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:29pm
'Donald Trump has defended his tariffs by arguing that they are already raking in almost $2bn (£1.6bn) a day for the US.
Speaking after more than $5tn of losses on the US stock market since his “liberation day” announcement last week, he made the claim on Tuesday, adding: “America is going to be very rich again, very soon.”
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/09/fact-check-donald-trump-tariffs-revenue

'Asked if he agreed that Americans were paying the tariffs, Trump said: "No, I don't agree. I think that they might be paying something. But when you take the overall impact, the Americans are gaining tremendously."
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-shift-acknowledges-americans-are-paying-something-tariffs-2025-11-06/

'senile : the physical and mental decline associated with old age; especially : the deterioration of cognitive functioning'

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:49pm

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


When Australia sends a product to the US, who pays the tariff when it arrives there: a) the Australian exporter or, b) the American importer?

A simple a) or b) will suffice.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:02pm

chimera wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:29pm:
'Asked if he agreed that Americans were paying the tariffs, Trump said: "No, I don't agree."'


How can one adjudicated rapist and convicted felon be so utterly stupid?


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:46pm

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:50pm

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.



Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03pm
'Slamming the US Supreme Court for overturning his “Liberation Day” global tariffs, President Donald Trump suggested he doesn’t plan to refund the fees already collected by the US government.'

As the cash was illegal profiteering, and he's immune and has a track record of dodgy deals, then it all belongs to him. You don't throw away a lifetime's experience just because of a fake judge.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:26pm

chimera wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03pm:
'Slamming the US Supreme Court for overturning his “Liberation Day” global tariffs, President Donald Trump suggested he doesn’t plan to refund the fees already collected by the US government.'

As the cash was illegal profiteering, and he's immune and has a track record of dodgy deals, then it all belongs to him. You don't throw away a lifetime's experience just because of a fake judge.

schizo crap.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:32pm
Strangely enough, the facts reported match the commentary.
But schizo MAGA of course is another world.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Carl D on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:47pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5Iel3S1GjM

One Fumed Over the Supreme Court (Cuckoo's Nest parody)

Mr. Newberger's AI Funnies


Quote:
Trump just got ruled against by the Supreme Court… and took it exactly how you’d expect.

In One Fumed Over the Supreme Court, a One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest parody, the ward fills up with tariff delusions, foreign conspiracies, and a patient who thinks losing power somehow makes him stronger.

From attacking his own justices to threatening economic chaos, this is what happens when reality checks in… and gets thrown out the window.

If you like your satire loud, absurd, and uncomfortably close to real life… welcome to the ward.


;D

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:49pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


When Australia sends a product to the US, who pays the tariff when it arrives there: a) the Australian exporter or, b) the American importer?

A simple a) or b) will suffice.


Wanna ask a friend, Frank?


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:57pm
Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by chimera on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:58pm
Neither is Trump. Or Frank.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:59pm

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:57pm:
Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated.


a) or b) ?

Come on - you can say it.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:05pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:59pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:57pm:
Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local pays the tariff.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated.


a) or b) ?

Come on - you can say it.



Which bit of the highlighted is totally beyond your comprehension, uneducated, bogan creepy bozo?




Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:36pm

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.


And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Sprintcyclist on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:27pm
If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in from of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Jasin on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:30pm
A Supreme Court still adhering to archaic Westernism from mainland Europe.
Not very American of them at all.

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:30pm

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.


And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!



Your memory, like much else about you, is ****ed beyond repair, trouser sniffer.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:33pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:27pm:
If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in front of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'


I think we already know the answer to that.

5. Defendant Trump had sexual contact with me at four different parties in the summer of 1994.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied me to a bed,
exposed himself to me, and then proceeded to forcibly rape me. During the course of this savage sexual
attack, I loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but he did not. Defendant Trump responded to
my pleas by violently striking me in the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do
whatever he wanted.


https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/jane-doe-affidavit.pdf

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Jasin on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:42pm
Gwoggy has a huge TV in his living room.
It's like a Holy Shrine dedicated to his faith to the Media God from America.
A Media still trying to rule Politics like a Musician out of his depth.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 4:37pm

Frank wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:30pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:36pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:50pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 6:46pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 5:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 9:37am:

Frank wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 7:03am:

Marla wrote on Feb 22nd, 2026 at 12:18am:

Frank wrote on Feb 21st, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Mr Trump said he would use a separate authority to impose a uniform tariff of 10 percent -- after he spent the past year imposing various rates spontaneously to cajole and punish other countrie.




Ol orange F A T T Y has no "separate authority" other than EO which is not law.



Good to know, Deidre.


President Trump announced Saturday he is imposing a new 15 per cent global tariff on all imports entering the US, effective immediately. The new tariff will replace the 10 per cent global tariff that Trump announced Friday shortly after the Supreme Court ruled that much of his existing tariff regime was illegal.

To impose the new tariff, he is turning to a legal tool called Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Broadly speaking, the provision, which has never before been used for tariffs, allows a president to impose tariffs of up to 15 per cent for as long as 150 days to address problems caused by persistent trade deficits.

Trade experts say the administration might succeed in raising revenue with Section 122 for a short while because of the time limit. For the moment, the law buys Trump’s team time to strategize on more individualised tariffs using other legal means. In a speech Friday, Trump vowed to reinstate levies at “potentially higher” levels.


Who pays this new tariff?

I'm curious.



Whoever still buys imported stuff instead of local.  That IS the point, creep. Like American? No tariff.


It's not complicated. 


So hilarious to see the old boy continuing to bang on about tariffs.

We're about to see his DL turn 180%. You'll see, by the end of this year, DL will be complaining about Sleepy Joe sticking tariffs on everything and how DESPICABLE they are.

The old boy will then say that. Today? Not so much. Tomorrow?

SO UNFAIR !!!

You remind me of the Obamas in that Trump clip.

They edited out the shittrowing derangement bits. But you bring it to us.


And you remind me of someone who once hated tariffs.

Despicable stuff.

SO UNFAIR !!!



Your memory, like much else about you, is ****ed beyond repair, trouser sniffer.


No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 4:45pm

Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 3:27pm:
If trump cannot accept a 'NO' from the Supreme Court in from of the whole world, what would he do to a scared girl in a private room when she says 'no'


Come come, Sprint, I think we all know the answer to this.

I'm sure his old buddy Jeff would have responded in the negative too. No no, he would have said to the hangman, I've been put up for a pardon. You talk to DL.

Oh, they would have chuckled, we already have!

And that, as they say, was that.

That's the Superior Man for you, Sprint.

A bit of this, that, and a little bit of somethin' else, no?

https://youtu.be/sKPYZvjOnnM?si=TzNELPBqpSs03nQa

Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Frank on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 5:00pm

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 4:37pm:
No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

:D :D :D


You don't remember, and never mind 'distinctly', what pantaloon you sniffed yesterday, son of glorious Pakistan.


Title: Re: U.S. Supreme Court rules Trump tariffs ILLEGAL
Post by Melanias purse on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 5:09pm

Frank wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 5:00pm:

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 23rd, 2026 at 4:37pm:
No no, dear boy, we distinctly remember.

Tariffs! You shrieked. Dessssspicable! Boo! Hiss!

So I'm curious. Whatever made you change your mind?

:D :D :D


You don't remember, and never mind 'distinctly', what pantaloon you sniffed yesterday, son of glorious Pakistan.


Oh, we most certainly do. You're so tendentious, you want to deflect and deny.

You do like to struggle, don't you now?

No worries, girlie, we'll give you something else. Do you deny being a devious non-wacist?

No one has the right to not be not offended, innit.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.