| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Federal Politics >> Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1771376760 Message started by whiteknight on Feb 18th, 2026 at 11:06am |
|
|
Title: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by whiteknight on Feb 18th, 2026 at 11:06am
Labor’s made-up $30 billion AUKUS ‘announceable’ for the SA election :(
2026-02-15 greens.org.au The Federal Labor Government today delivered a made-up $30 billion AUKUS ‘announceable’ for South Australia, that is not backed up by any budget commitment and is a stark political play weeks out from the SA State election. Only a fraction of these funds are in the budget forecasts, nominally to build facilities at Osborne for the construction of AUKUS submarines over a decade in the future for boats that have not yet been designed. The AUKUS Agreement is intended to enable Australia to purchase second-hand US nuclear submarines, which experts say is unlikely to occur. Meanwhile, the UK is leading the design and production of the new type of AUKUS nuclear submarine, core parts of which the UK audit office says is ‘unachievable’. Senator David Shoebridge, Greens Spokesperson for Defence, said: “This $30 billion is a made-up number, we saw the same thing from Labor late last year for the Henderson precinct in WA just weeks before Albanese went to Washington. “Labor is shameless in announcing these multi-billion dollar, uncosted AUKUS numbers without even a shred of reality, let alone budget commitments, to back them in. “The real budgeted amount for South Australia is only a fraction of what the Albanese Government has committed to the UK and the US submarine industries. That should show you everything about the priorities of Federal and State Labor. “We have seen this all before in South Australia, the Government spending hundreds of millions building facilities for French submarines only to spend millions more to tear it all down when the project crashed. We are watching history repeat itself with AUKUS. “The only secure jobs this will create are for retired Labor and Liberal politicians going to work in the US and UK defence industries after they leave politics.” Quotes attributable to Robert Simms MLC, said: “While South Australians are desperate for cost-of-living relief, Labor are wasting billions of dollars on nuclear submarines when we could instead fund healthcare, education and housing.” Quotes attributable to Lead Upper House Candidate Melanie Selwood, said: “The major parties are bending over backwards to deliver the doomed AUKUS plan. AUKUS ties our state's economic future to the US, defence industries, and the storage of nuclear waste. Instead we could be building a future for our state by funding local infrastructure manufacturing, building affordable housing, and investing in educational programs that serve the interests of South Australians, not the US and the UK." |
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Jasin on Feb 18th, 2026 at 11:49am
While SWEDEN has the superior submarines at half the price and can deliver 5 in just 5 years.
Australia didn't check Trivago. |
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Sir Eoin O Fada on Feb 18th, 2026 at 11:50am
And keep in mind that the description ‘’Nuclear’’ is totally misleading as the intended design and the existing submarines are steam powered, the main purpose of the nuclear reactor is to boil the water.
|
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Bobby. on Feb 18th, 2026 at 7:56pm Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Feb 18th, 2026 at 11:50am:
You silly Billy - how else can you turn the heat of a nuclear reactor into useful work? |
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Sir Eoin O Fada on Feb 18th, 2026 at 8:30pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2026 at 7:56pm:
You can’t, that’s why they are steam boats and not nuclear powered, if the boiler doesn’t boil then all the nuclear power in the world can’t turn the propellers. Don’t be a sheep, think for yourself. Just as an afterthought, did you celebrate the start of the New Millennium on the 1st January 2000? |
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Bobby. on Feb 18th, 2026 at 8:35pm Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Feb 18th, 2026 at 8:30pm:
Trick question. Google AI: Technically and officially, the New Millennium (3rd Millennium) and 21st Century began on January 1, 2001. While most of the world celebrated at the start of 2000 due to the "year 2000" (Y2K) hype, the calendar system has no year zero, meaning the first millennium ended after year 1000 and the second ended after 2000. |
|
Title: Re: Labor's Made Up $30 Billion AUKUS Number Post by Sir Eoin O Fada on Feb 19th, 2026 at 10:01am Bobby. wrote on Feb 18th, 2026 at 8:35pm:
Not a trick question at all, I merely asked if you followed the sheep and fell for the lie that the new millennium started on New Years Day in 2000. Obviously you know the truth. The sheep also believe that so called ‘’Nuclear Powered Submarines’’ run on nuclear power. Steam submarines have always been a disaster and the AUKUS versions, whilst not being the physical disaster of their predecessors, will prove to be a financial disaster for Australia. |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |