| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> Studying Epstein http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1770604572 Message started by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 12:36pm |
|
|
Title: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 12:36pm
Yes Epstein is a pedophile and the world is a better place without him
But he can provide a wealth of insights if he is studied and not just used by chodes to feel "morally superior" Some insights 1. Whether through training in spycraft or uncanny intuition, Epstein knew how to make people feel way more trusting of him then they should have. 2 for example, the number 2politician in the cameron government , felt ok to be photographed in his underwear. Andrew felt ok to be photographed hovering over a young woman. 3 Richard branson felt enough trust to say " should I bring my harem or just avail myself of yours". Elon asked about when was the next party 4. Bill did a tour of Africa with Epstein. Epstein took hundreds of pics. If you look at those Bill never looked more relaxed and happy. 5. Fergie expressed her love. She asked Epstein to propose to her.she revealed intimate details including that her father ( probably an abuser) called her GB. Ginger bush 6 many of the young women appear to have expressed their love for him. On the night of his death , it seems he spent 2 hours on the phone to a girl he had been in relationship with since she was 14. 7 gates, Larry page, Richard dawkiins, thecrownprince of Norway. He seemed to have their complete trust DESPITE being a convicted sex offender. One of the things the chodes do not understand is that it really is " lonely at the top" And people starved of physical touch , for instance, wither away. Bill Clinton and gates both had quite cold partners. I am sure Epstein realized.. Aha... Massage Indeed he seemed to use physical touch thru massage as one of his go to strategies. There are 40,000 images of the rich and famous being massaged. The chode doesn't realize how much the lonely politician or tech billionaires ( thielle, musk ) crave this. It appears he got to mendelson by 2 gifts worth about 20 grand . Why would a super rich guy respond to that? Because a politician gets nothing but hate from his constituents, so a nice gesture stands out. An insight for the chodes...if you want a politicians help, maybe give him something nice instead of the usual hate. Epstein, it seems, learnt how to understand what people needed and play to that. Sure, for Saudi princes and Dubai executives it was underage girls. But for scientists , it was their egos, getting to come and meet George clooney or Leo decaprio at lunch . Imagine working 80 hrs a week for years in a lab. You would crave a little fame. The tech bros were probably nerds at school bordering on incel .of course they want some hot chicks around. Politicians just want to get away from their nagging hateful entitled voters. He offered that. He must have been an ace at spy school. He really knew how to win trust. The chode should study how he was able to network. It's a powerful skill. Put yourself into Bill gates mind. Lonely , bored, burnt out, joyless.... Fergie....horny, scared, daddy issues.broke. Naomi chomsky ...big ego , overlooked, craving relevance. Clooney... Spinning his wheels in acting. Even Paul keatings daughter. Trying to network, desperate.. Invite her to a dinner party....she will go |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Sophia on Feb 9th, 2026 at 1:01pm
Well if we delve further….here’s a study on a supposed death photo of Epstein from a mortician.
Well worth watching this! https://youtu.be/9exzWqnuPmg?si=Gdapv0m7sLH1AwPB |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:00pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 12:36pm:
Some excellent insights here, dear. We need to study him. Strangely, many of these have been disgraced and thrown out of power. I wonder why. Just think of all they must have learned from being in the company of such greats. Success, fame, fortune, power. Now, you've listed ten names here. Would you care to list the names you've omitted? Cheers. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Dnarever on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:17pm
You know the name Harry potter is printed in the whole Harry potter series less often that Trump appears in the Epstine files?
|
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:35pm
Again the chodes can't see it
Are karmal and DNA "smarter" then gates, musk , Clinton, dawkins, hawkins, Larry page, Richard branson? No. So if these guys can be fooled into trusting someone with epsteins methods, HOW MUCH EASIER would the half asleep average chode be fooled. What Epstein says is that you need to study and understand other humans and their motivations or you will be at a disadvantage. Failure to be able to put yourself in someone's shoes makes you stupid and ignorant. I totally get why gates musk Clinton etc behaved the way they did. Lonely men . Not just horny men . Understanding this would be of great benefit to any chode looking to please his boss and advance his career. As an example, having a good social network of hot women who are your friends would propel you up the corporate ladder far more then slaving at your desk 80 hrs a week. Worth studying |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Carl D on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:42pm
That's another 5 minutes of my life I will never get back (reading aquascoot's word salads).
OIP-3260141533.jpg (46 KB | 3
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:46pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 12:36pm:
Your fetish with international crims and high-profile perverts says more about you than you'd imagine. I'm guessing more than studying them, you'd want to be them... if only you had the balls for it. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Sophia on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:50pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:35pm:
You do raise good points and it makes me wonder how Epstein could easily make so many rich and famous lower their guard with him. He must appeal to a base need, as you mentioned, something people at the top feel is lacking. Because …..“the higher, the fewer”. But if he could win over so many confidences, and was supposedly have died in prison…. That video I posted of the mortician’s professional observation is raising questions, and I wondered, just how clever is the charmer Epstein? Faking death? Is he still alive and laughing at the world? Didn’t save Ghislaine from jail term. He’s probably lapping up the zillions elsewhere on another new remote “island”. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:50pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:17pm:
'Epstein' appears fewer times in the Epstein files than 'Trump'. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by tallowood on Feb 9th, 2026 at 3:03pm Sophia wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:50pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 9th, 2026 at 3:30pm
"So, you see, Your Honour, I wasn't a friend of Ivan Milat's, and I don't condone what he did... far from it... I was living with him in his house to study him."
|
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:20pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:35pm:
Oh? Is that so? So why did you spend half of 2021 shrieking about Bill Gates vaxing the chodes and farming them for their data? And why did you spend 2022 hissing about Bill, the old dog, Clinton, flying Epstein Airlines and sneaking down to the island to prey on Jeff's babes? We could see that the lockdowns were taking their toll. Good God, you said, telling us about the pilot logs, they're all through them! So show us the pilot logs, we said. Find them them yourself, you said, and started screaming. The leftards! Epstein! DEEP STATE !!! Pull yourself together, man, we said. Here's the pilot logs. Bill borrowed Jeff's plane to go to Africa for the Clinton Foundation. What rubbish, you said. Listen, you explained, it was the wives you felt for the most. The leftards should appreciate that, no? Just think, you said, while Bill, the old dog, was down on Epstein Island getting up to God knows what, he missed his 30th wedding anniversary, can you imagine? Now, you said, you'd never thought much of Hillary, but thinking of her sitting at home with the dinner in the oven waiting for Bill brought a tear to your eye. Have you ever heard of anything so appalling? What kind of man would do something as dastardly as that? Hmm, we said. News had just broken about Donnie's shenanigans while Melania was nursing their first son, Barron. We saw what you were up to. I see, we said. So while Donnie was off banging porn stars, Bill, the old dog, was preying on children, is that what you're saying? Correct, you said. And while Donnie was just being an Alpha, sowing his wild oats, the leftards were all down on Epstein Island engaging in Satanic child rape, is that it? Exactly, you said. So look, we said, what would you say if we were to inform you that your DL was not only down on Epstein Island, but there are reports of your DL banging underage babes with Jeff, knocking them up and threatening to kill them if they ever said a word? Not Bill Gates, we said, not Bill, the old dog, Clinton, not even George Clooney, but your very own DL? Impossible, you said. There's no evidence whatsoever, never ever, none. So if this were to ever come out, we said, you'd refuse to support such a man ever again, would you? Er... You said. Yes? Um... You sounded confused, so we decided to make ourselves clear. Look, we said, if you found that your DL, President of the United States, was not only flying Epstein Airlines, but was actually down on the Island, banging the same 13 year olds as Jeff and threatening to kill them if they spoke up, you'd say enough's enough, you're done with him, you'll never worship someone so heinous and despicable again, not now, not ever. In fact, you'd apologise for defending and denying and running his propaganda and subjecting the leftards to such ridiculous, easily disprovable lies for all these years. But that was it. While we were explaining, you were off - poof! Out the back door, just like that. So, I'm curious. Now you're back with us again, would you care to answer now? Cheers. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:40pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:46pm:
Oh I think that's one of the main things at play in a lot of haters. Their hate is frustration that they live a mediocre life and they can get a little thrill by crapping on someone because it makes them feel superior. Why do you think MAGA incels (and gweg and karmal ) are the MOST triggered. I would love to have met the guy .make my own assessment of what made him capable of winning over so many highly intelligent people. You could read machievellis " the prince " or you could sit down with Robert green and analyse epsteins behaviours. ( the 49 laws of power) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:43pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 3:30pm:
Are you saying there's nothing to be learnt from studying Ivan milat, Hannibal lector, ted bundy? That anyone who studies them wants to " be" them? Weird idead you have You'd have to get rid of half the podcasts and shows on Netflix |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:45pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:20pm:
Abilify 400 mg imi monthly might help you |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Dnarever on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:01pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 2:35pm:
Quote:
Yes very easily they call themselves MAGA. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:17pm
I really can't be bothered with Epstein personally - I just want the full list of names and the evidence of wrongdoing to be put out there. Guilt by association is not sufficient.
As for Ghislaine Maxwell - I'm not 100% convinced, but the tales of her 'grooming' 13 and 14 year olds are compelling. There is some suggestion she may be autistic in some degree - certainly her moral compass was poorly set, but her father was the absolute pits and there are hints of ..... wrongdoing .... she being his favourite daughter.... Could be a little leeway for parole. On the other side of the Big Ditch, the very fact that the person doing it has to struggle to get a full investigation into rapes of countless British minor girls tells a story of its own. The West is crying out for strong REAL leaders... and there are none on the horizon with even Trump being half-baked. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:22pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:45pm:
I see. So our assumptions were wrong, were they? What you really meant to say is you couldn't care less if your DL's a naughty old child rapist. Why don't you just say that? It would save all these convoluted excuses, shurely. Why not just come out and say it? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:30pm Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:17pm:
Not at all. There's no evidence of autism or any mental health problems at all. Ghislaine spent the best part of 20 years trafficking kiddies for the rich and famous because she liked playing queen bee. At least five of Ghislaine's victims committed suicide. Her crimes were found to be so despicable, premeditated and harmful, she got a 20 year stretch without parole. And here in this thread, we have the usual suspects playing them down. Never forget that these usual suspects were the ones who used to talk them up. Despicable stuff indeed. Why must the left lie? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:54pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
You need to come clean about what there is to learn about yourself and your fetish for psychopaths and perverts. What kind of people do you think obsess over Netflix and podcast psycho-pervert porn? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:57pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:22pm:
Why the obsession with trump. Everyone knows trump is a big swinging dick. Of course he banged every hot 20 yo he could. He and Clinton and JFK were racking up huge numbers. Children ? No evidence of that That's a kink. I think Epstein may have had something to do with providing girls under the age of consent to muslims in dubai and the land of saud. A Saudi prince brought the island next door FOR Jeffrey. This would have been Epstein carrying out the demands of his controllers the CIA to garnet favours in the middle east As for who brought the second larger more expensive island ( still operating) No it wasn't Donald. Or. Jeffrey It was one of those Muslim sugar Daddy's :'( :'( |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:59pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:30pm:
You are debauched in your way, gweggy in his. Debauchery is pretty wide-spread, in high society and among the dregs and everywhere in between. Muslims have been raping and degrading working class English girls for decades, with police and political connievance and cover-up and.Still going on. A couple of rich Jews ensnared society girls for society high flyers, the great and good and not so good, for pleasure and kompromat. The former, infinitely larger scale, has no Trump, no Jew angle. So all the talk by the debauched karnals, gwegys and SadProud Armchairs is about the latter. And what is happening in Africa, India on an even larger scale - they dont care. No Jews, No Trump - no speaka. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:10pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:57pm:
There's a mountain of evidence. Why must the right protect pedos? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:11pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 3:30pm:
Hey Meister, I know we started last year off with a little contention. I must confess I might have been a little rash. Yes, I know I said Elon's right-handed salute was a little bit light-hearted and naughty, but do you know? I was wrong. I now believe Elon's gesture was a signal of the transition to a full-blown Nazi regime. It was planned, implemented and is now being carried out before our very eyes. Naughty? I think not. This was their plan all along. Cunning, no? Yes, Meister. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:12pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:10pm:
He really doesn't want to say, does he? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:28pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:59pm:
Just so. In all your evasions, denials and no-speakas, you miss the very point. This isn't about keeping child sexual predators out of office, dear boy, far from it. It's about the security consequences if you don't. In his own rise to power, Der Fuhrer was smart enough to knock off pedos like Ernst Rohm as quick as he could. He knew the risk of the enemy getting their hands on that information all too well. Today, the US has handed its entire foreign policy over to you-know-who. DL and little Marco aren't calling the shots, as every schoolboy knows. Because of your DL's little - ahem - pecadillos, Bibi and Vlad now have the dirt. Whatever's in the FBI files pales in comparison to what Mossad and the FSB know all too well. Why do you think they now own the US of A? That's not on Jeff, dear boy, that's on your very own DL. You need to study him. Five years is the minimum, no? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:05pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 7:28pm:
And yet the only kompromat they have on Trump is - what? Pussy grabbing, E Carrol memory recovery after 20 years, and ... er...a phone call to Zelly and a bank loan scandal. Meanwhile Gates, Mr Mass Vax, is soliciting antibiotics to secret into his missus's tea on account of his catching the pox from 'travelling' Russian girl. Kier Starmer's house is firebombed by a bunch of Ukrainian twinks - nuffin to see here. Lord Mandelson, Tony Blair's very own Malcolm Tucker, is appointed US Ambassador of His Majesty's Goverbment even as Sir Kier ( and everyone else) knew his debauchery. Trump is the least of it, but since you are all deformed little ABC parochials, you focus on him. We are living in our very own Ancient Regime, paki pedestrian. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:20pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:05pm:
Well, he's an adjudicated rapist with 34 criminal convictions accused of raping 26 women, and at least one small child, who has said on many occasions that he wants to screw his own daughter and that he used to enjoy walking in on children getting dressed in the change rooms of beauty pageants. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:27pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:20pm:
You are, of course, lying like the barefaced slanderous unclean creep you are. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:30pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:27pm:
Every single word is true. Well, he's an adjudicated rapist with 34 criminal convictions accused of raping 26 women, and at least one small child, who has said on many occasions that he wants to screw his own daughter and that he used to enjoy walking in on children getting dressed in the change rooms of beauty pageants. Why do you like rapists and criminals so much? Birds of a feather? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:35pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:30pm:
You are accused of all sorts of despicable stuff, despicable creep. Accusatìons are easy. And so you peddle them. But you are worse. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:38pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:35pm:
Everything I said is a fact. Let's go through it, line by line, and you can tell us all which line is wrong - okay? "Well, he's an adjudicated rapist with 34 criminal convictions ..." So, where is the mistake in that line? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:56pm
It's bollocks.
34 crimes? Unconditional discharge. Ie - show trial. Was E Caŕoll grabbed by the pussy? I dont think so, but who cares. The guy lived in a sea of willjng pussies to be grabbed. Did E Carrol wake up after 20 years, when Trump ascended to POLITICAL prominence, to suddenly recall/invent a story? I think so. Does gweggg wank? At a 100 RPM. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:57pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:56pm:
No, it's an undeniable fact that can never be erased from history. He IS an adjudicated rapist with 34 criminal convictions. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 9th, 2026 at 9:47pm greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 8:57pm:
But of course. Can you imagine the old boy telling it as it is? He's the biggest howler here. WAAAH! SO UNFAIR !!! |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by mothra on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:13am
I don't think we need to llo to much further than the caliber of those Horseboy would have us study o understand the caliber of Horseboy.
Furthermore, i don't think we need to look further that the caliber of Horseboy to ascertain the caliber of those he would have us study. Altogether wanting in absolutely every way that matters. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Marla on Feb 10th, 2026 at 2:27pm Frank wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 6:59pm:
So this is why you are pro-pedophile |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 10th, 2026 at 2:56pm mothra wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:13am:
And Carl says I write word salad 🥗 ;) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:07pm Marla wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 2:27pm:
He has no problem with people taking children to Epstein Island: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1770523331/26#26 |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:26pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 2:56pm:
She calls it predilection. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Marla on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:29pm
Oh, fat Frank is definitely pro-pedophilia. He defends his stance on almost every post he spews from his bigoted keyboard
|
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:33pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 12:36pm:
You keep insisting this is some detached sociological exercise, but given your history, nobody should pretend this is being offered in good faith. Yes, you ritualistically state that Epstein was a paedophile and that the world is better off without him. That sentence is doing an extraordinary amount of laundering for what follows. What you then present is not analysis, it is rationalisation. You take a child rape enterprise and reframe it as a case study in elite loneliness, ego management, and networking psychology. That shift matters. It moves responsibility away from the abuser and his enablers and towards a narrative where exploitation becomes an almost understandable by-product of unmet emotional needs. The pattern is familiar. Every time Epstein comes up, you don't interrogate the adults who knowingly associated with a convicted sex offender, you empathise with them. Lonely, burnt out, touch-starved, misunderstood geniuses. Somehow the only people who don't get interiority in your story are the children. You speculate endlessly about Bill Gates' emotional state, Fergie's sexuality, scientists' egos, politicians' resentment of voters, yet you treat systemic abuse as background noise. That is not neutral analysis. That is a moral reordering where the comfort of powerful adults is foregrounded and the harm to minors is abstracted away. And let's be clear, Epstein's "skill" was not networking. It was predation enabled by wealth, power, and institutional cowardice. He did not discover a clever hack for winning trust. He exploited the fact that elite circles will tolerate almost anything, including known child abuse, so long as access, flattery, and deniability are preserved. Framing this as something "the chodes should study" is particularly grotesque. What exactly is the lesson here? That if you massage enough egos and supply enough bodies, the abuse becomes comprehensible? That predators should be admired for operational competence? Given your track record of minimising, deflecting, and reframing responsibility whenever Epstein's associates are mentioned, nobody is obliged to treat this as curiosity rather than apologetics. If you genuinely wanted to understand Epstein, you would start with why so many powerful adults chose to look away from the abuse of children, not with how lonely billionaires felt while doing it. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:36pm Marla wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:29pm:
Before the redacted Epstein files were released, with the 3 million other files still hidden, he refused to say he'd hold Trump to account if the release included evidence that would implicate him in the abuse of children. It's disgusting. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:38pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:36pm:
Yep. And now this, which is just unbelievable: https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1770523331/26#26 |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:44pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:33pm:
Idiotic performative bluster. It IS worth examining how Epstein achieved the trust and friendship of the rich and famous. The other thing to note that not all, not even most of the young women procured were under-age. And another thing to note is that none of you mongs are anywhere near so excercised about the Muslim rape gangs that have been operating in England for decades with incalculabbley more underage girls as their victims, aided and shielded by the British political class and the police. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:47pm Frank wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:44pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 30th, 2026 at 11:52am:
It's not even worth highlight your reflective defense of Epstein and the rape of children anymore... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:59pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:47pm:
Calling your silly bluster idiotic performative bluster is not 'abuse'. Anyway, you actually agree with Aqua among all that bluster: "He exploited the fact that elite circles will tolerate almost anything, including known child abuse, so long as access, flattery, and deniability are preserved." How Epstein did that is worth examning, and how the 'great and good' fell for it or went along with it is also worth examining. You are silent on the incalculably greater number of child rape victims of Muslim hangs in England. The pattern is familiar.... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:06pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:33pm:
Come come, Sad, Aquascoot's not just making mindless word salads here, dear, he's attempting to reform Jeff's entire legacy. Aquascoot wants to turn Jeff into a Superior Man, worth "being studied", he upon the "narrow path to success". Aquascoot's already tried selling Epstein Island as a motivational college, a kind of Trump University for big-swinging dicks. Now he's pitching Jeff as a Nietzschean superman, up there with the big fella himself, who Aquascoot cunningly erases from the picture. This is a job worthy of John Barron, a true PR makeover job. Sure, Aquascoot might not have the gossip columnists and tabloid editors the big fella has in his speed-dial, but he's just as hungry to clear his DL's name. Get with the program, Sad. This is what it means to be awesome - in Aquascoot's unique brand of misspelt cult-speak - preaching to the chodes who, for those willing to suspend their disbelief, deserve not a handout, but a hand-up. You need to study him - 5 years is the minimum. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:07pm Frank wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:59pm:
They are off topic, that's why. You are only pointing to them to minimise the pedophilia associated with people who are reflexively defending. I honestly don't understand your compulsion to defend child abusers. It's becoming, sadly, a familiar pattern with you... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:12pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:07pm:
Pedophilia and sex abuse by muslim rape gangs fits into the topic. Turning a blind eye to sex crimes including pedophilia is the topic. I honesly dont understand your compjlsion to defend Muslim child abusers. Is it a wacism thing?? (Yes.) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:18pm Frank wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 3:59pm:
Not at all, dear boy. It's worth what those squares who uphold the rule of law call investigating. You gave this up yourself many moons ago, which might explain your frantic calls to bury the Epstein files altogether. Nothing to see here, no? Just so. After all, the last thing you want is anybody studying you-know-who, dear. You'd disagwee with the very pwemise, as every schoolboy knows. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:23pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:18pm:
Ah, the troused sniffer arŕives.... Did you walk.... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:40pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:07pm:
My understanding is that the child sex trafficking was exclusively to middle eastern princes and businessmen of the Islamic persuasion. Why do you defend child rapists |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:09pm Frank wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:12pm:
I hereby and henceforth condemn all child sex crimes, dear boy. Can you do the same? That's a question. We may have a supplimentary. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:12pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:40pm:
Ah, the noble capitalist. "Narrow road to success", innit. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Bobby. on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:14pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:09pm:
I do the same - would you like to be the hangman? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:25pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:14pm:
Old boy? Bobby does the same. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Bobby. on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:30pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:25pm:
Karnal, we can't let em get away with it - hang em. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:14pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:40pm:
I'm not, they should be held to account for what they did, nobody is arguing otherwise, but that's not a topic for the America forum. You know that, which is why you're trying to use it to distract from those you support being all up in children. Which is disgusting. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:27pm Bobby. wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 6:30pm:
You've confessed. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:47am Frank wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:12pm:
Only if the aim is to derail the thread and protect the people you're uncomfortable scrutinising. This is Studying Epstein, not a grab-bag of crimes you'd rather talk about. Dragging in "Muslim rape gangs" here isn't about relevance or protecting children, it's a distraction from Trump's ties to Epstein and the abusers still hidden behind redactions. If you actually cared about accountability, you'd back holding all abusers to account, including the ones on your side. Right now, all you're doing is running cover for them. Quote:
I've already been explicit that anyone involved should be held to account. That isn't in dispute. What is in dispute is your attempt to hijack the discussion by forcing it onto a very specific case that is plainly off topic. This is a thread literally titled Studying Epstein. The tangent you're obsessively pushing belongs in a separate discussion, one that should absolutely happen, just not here. I genuinely don't know what more you think you're owed at this point. Unless, of course, your actual position is that in a thread about Epstein, we should stop talking about Trump and Epstein altogether and instead redirect the conversation to other abusers entirely. If that's your argument, state it clearly, because right now this reads less like principled moderation and more like reflexive defence of abusers on your own side, yet again. And let's not memory-hole the key point you keep dodging. You still refuse to commit to holding Trump accountable, even if the unredacted Epstein files were to incriminate him. Faced with the hypothetical of clear evidence of Trump abusing children, you still can't bring yourself to agree that he should be held to account. So no, don't dress this up as some good-faith concern for children or process. What you're doing is protecting abusers by running interference for one in particular. The topic-shifting isn't about safeguarding victims, it's about shielding perpetrators. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:48am aquascoot wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 5:40pm:
What does that have to do with Studying Epstein? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:38am ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:48am:
Because Epstein with the blessing of his intelligence agency handlers was supplying girls for the child sex trade. He wasn't getting young women in America to traffic them back to America. ::) If you check out the world's richest man in times past adnan kashogi, he was running all the weapons for the Americans, initially to the Iranians, then to the Iraqis. He had billions. He had no interest in cash. He did like girls. The CIA were happy to oblige. They needed " connectors" Epstein types. Epstein had 70 counts of child rape brought against him. The FBI thought he would rot in jail. The federal government Washington stepped in . Kenneth star and Alan acosta were the prosecutors. And they secretly scrapped all the charges. Why. Because he worked for the intelligence agencirsvdoing very seedy things. We are being served up useful idiots Gates, Andrew, Musk, branson, pinker attia, lutnick. Maxwell said there were 30 big players in the network. I would bet not one has been named. When I get time I am going to do a post on how the CIA ordered the murder of 2 children on a Forrest who accidentally came across the cia and pilot Barry seal unloading cocaine in Arkansas. Bill Clinton as governor and Ronald Regan as president were later informed of this cover up when the parents demanded an autopsy. The intelligence agency are fine with child murder. They are fine with Epstein victims being told to piss off And they are fine with child trafficking to regimes that like young girls and boys. And like it or not, it is mainly rich middle eastern states that value young girls and boys. Try and make it all about Trump if you want. Be a useful idiot for the intelligence agencies. I'm sure they love your work and simplistic thinking ::) Do you really think the intelligence agencies didn't know about Epstein He was flying presidents around. That alone would trigger interest |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:50am
This thread is titled Studying Epstein, not Free-associate every intelligence-agency conspiracy until Trump disappears.
You and Frank keep doing the same manoeuvre, when Epstein's documented ties to Trump come up, you flood the thread with Muslim gangs, Middle Eastern princes, the CIA, Barry Seal, Arkansas forests, Reagan, Clinton, and hypothetical murders of unnamed children. It's not analysis, it's a smoke screen. Even if every claim you're making were true, and most of them are unsubstantiated assertions stacked on top of each other, it still wouldn't erase the facts that matter here, Epstein operated in the US, recruited American girls, abused them on American soil, and socialised extensively with powerful Americans, including Trump. That's why this is being discussed in an American politics forum. Notice the pattern, any time Trump's proximity to Epstein is mentioned, suddenly responsibility must be displaced elsewhere, Muslims, foreigners, intelligence agencies, shadowy elites overseas. Everyone except the people actually named in flight logs, photos, depositions, and court records. If you genuinely cared about victims, you wouldn't be trying so hard to redirect attention away from one of the most well-documented child abuse networks in modern US history simply because it implicates people you politically sympathise with. Calling others "useful idiots" while repeating unverified intelligence-fan-fiction to shield a former US president from scrutiny is… ironic, at best. If you want to start a thread on intelligence agencies, Middle Eastern elites, or global trafficking networks, do it. But stop pretending this frantic topic-shifting is anything other than an attempt to protect Trump and defend child abusers by drowning the conversation in noise. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:57am
Nothing yet to link Trump with the young girls of Epstein or even his island or love express?
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/the-facts-and-timeline-of-trump-and-epsteins-falling-out |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:07am aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:38am:
Why? Because they were connected to your DL, silly Billy. As a reward, he made Alex Acosta his transport secretary. He would have pardoned Jeff too, if some bright spark didn't suggest a little "accident" to make it go away permanently. Your DL is fine with child murder. He is fine with Epstein's victims being told to piss off. And he is fine with child trafficking to friends that like young girls and boys. How do we know? Because he's trying to distract, evade and cover it all up as we speak. Not once has he expressed any contrition for the victims. Not once has he sought any form of investigation for the offenders still at large. Not once has he revealed his own role in the network, which he was at the centre of. . This wasn't the CIA, you silly old fool, this was your very own DL. You know this, every schoolboy knows. No matter how hard you try, you can never make this go away. How does it feeeeel? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:14am
Oh dear.
When Starr and acosta let Jeff go it was years before DL went to Washington. Try harder |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:16am
Oh dear.
Skippy says I'm trying to derail a thread on studying Epstein. A thread I started ::) As if studying Epstein trafficking of girls to the middle east isn't studying Epstein ::) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Bobby. on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:24am Melanias purse wrote on Feb 10th, 2026 at 10:27pm:
So you don't wanna be the hangman? :-/ |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:25am aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:16am:
Studying Epstein is not the same as investigating Epstein. Studying implies a fascination with the personality, an obsession with envying his charisma or power, even. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:42am MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:25am:
Silly bollocks. So all genocide and holocaust studies academics are really Hitlerites. ANyone studying WWII wants to have WWIII. Or doctors studying cancer realy want to give you cancer. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:13am Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:42am:
There's a huge difference between studying history or disease to prevent harm, and treating the methods of a convicted pedophile as a "playbook" for influence. Epstein wasn't a subject to learn from in an abstract sense, he was a predator exploiting children and powerful people alike. The post you're defending doesn't analyse, it admires, it instructs, it normalises manipulation and abuse. Comparing that to academics or doctors doing legitimate research is a false equivalence. One is pursuing knowledge to save lives or understand the past. The other is openly dissecting how to exploit, abuse, and network like a child trafficker. Pretending that's the same thing isn't clever, it's morally blind. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:13am Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:42am:
So that's what you're pretending Aquascoot is referring to when calling for studying, eh! Academic research! And, yes, many, if not most, of those 'studying' Hitler are obsessed with him... and not in an academic way. Hence, the endless documentaries on him, making him more documented than the years he was alive... When does 'studying' betray a dark obsession? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:25am aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:14am:
Oh? So why did your DL fire his buddy Alex Acosta? You should know this. It was huge news at the time. Please explain? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:28am MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:13am:
:D "I'm a scholar, you are a Doctor of Divinity, he has a dark obsession." Well, you studied Jabotinsky and Ben Gurion et also you are a, obsessive Zionist jew. Or are your 'learned pronouncements' apply only to others, never to yourself? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:29am Bobby. wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 10:24am:
You want Ghislaine, the only person charged for the Epstein child sex ring, pardoned. You said so yourself. We're dealing with the very bottom of the barrel here, leftards. The board's infested with them. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:40am Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:29am:
Yeah, why IS that? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:48am Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:28am:
I read what Jabotinsky and Ben Gurion et al had to say on Zionism - militant and non-militant, that's not obsession. But, given how many streets and places are named after Jabotinsky, that his tomb is elevated to a place of high honour, how Israelis worship and, yes, study him, I'd say they're obsessed with him. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:49am
Skippy is being quite stupid.
When I look at the Palestinian protestors last night ( rent a crowd) I just see rather low agency people who like the safety of the mob. You could study them , but there's not much to learn. The shooter on the bridge however. Now there's a guy worth studying. A rich vein of knowledge and wisdom to be acquired by studying him. In life we should study the outstanding successes and the outstanding failures. It's nothing to do with envy , Skippy, you numptie. At the edge is where all the learning is to be found. If I could make one comment about people who post abuse against Trump or Hilary or Joe or Pauline or albo online. I would think you would have to be in a very dark.plave to.just put anonymous hate out there into the ether. It's why most people can teach you nothing. Not worth studying. Gweg and karmal , for instance, posting hate about malenia and her vaginal odour. That's dark and boring Best to move on a study more complex individuals. Like Epstein and other Machiavellian actors |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:53am aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:49am:
And learn their mind tricks so, y'know... You can use their power for... y'know... 'good'. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 12:27pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:49am:
Calling abuse "study" doesn't magically launder it into insight. You're not analysing systems, incentives, or failures, you're romanticising pathological individuals and mistaking notoriety for depth. Epstein isn't a "complex individual" in the sense you're pretending. He's a fairly banal predator who succeeded because institutions failed, people were compromised, and power shields itself. The interesting subject is why those systems protect men like him, not treating the man himself as some edge-case guru with "wisdom to be acquired". Your examples give the game away. You dismiss protestors as low-agency mobs, then elevate mass shooters and traffickers as worthy of admiration-by-proxy because they're "at the edge". That's not seriousness, it's voyeurism dressed up as contrarian intellect. Studying failure is valid. Studying crime is valid. Treating criminals as models, or implying there's something aspirational or instructive in their methods, is how moral blindness gets repackaged as sophistication. And spare me the lectures about anonymous hate while you're openly sneering, name-calling, and fawning over child traffickers as "Machiavellian actors". That contradiction isn't edgy, it's incoherent. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:18pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:40am:
And you're there, dear boy, all the way down - one of the biggest bottom feeders on the board. While you're down there, love... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:42pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 12:27pm:
Is that what he's doing? Here we all were thinking he's just trying to get DL and his buddies off the hook. But he's actually trying to virtue signal sophistication, is he? How diabolically creepy. I thought Bobby was desperate for calling for Ghislaine's pardon. Or the old boy, with his nudge nudge allegations of pedestrianism. But you're right. Feigning academic status for incoherent words salads excusing child sex traffickers takes the cake. Aquascoot's got a PhD in hay. He's as studious as that poster who threw a two-year tantrum over Bill, the old dog, Clinton flying Epstein Airlines. Strange, that was Aquascoot too. One of these things is just like the other, no? How sophisticated. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:49pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 12:27pm:
You are a congenital, reflexive liar, like gweggy and karnal.You lie like a Pavlovian dog salivates - on cue. And that reflexive lying makes you really stupid and blinkered. How did Epsten do it? How did he charm so many of the great and good, peple who regard themselves as our betters and whom many people regard as indeed their betters? Or are they all just banal simpletons and you are the only smart, insightful, wise tepot becuse you can say to everything that, "Oh, it is just...." You combine base stupidity, blinkered, reflexive lying and verbose bluster. Dreadful. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:53pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:49pm:
Where have I lied? Put up or shut up. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:57pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:53am:
Incorrect . You learn their mind tricks so y 'know THEY CAN'T USE THEM ON YOU 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:06pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:57pm:
Somehow, I'm doubting you'd be trafficked by an Epsteinian bloke for sex in the UAE. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:08pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 1:53pm:
Don't stress about it skip. We live in a world where everyone can now have their own truth This will make you a better student |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:10pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:06pm:
No but I might get invited to a dinner party with a few celebrities and I would now question the motivation of the host and remember that your reputation takes a lifetime to build and one mistake to destroy . So I might not go . Studying Epstein has helped me avoid a pitfall |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:11pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 11:28am:
And while we're here, you're the worst kind of former 'academic'... Humouring certain posters here with their delusions... Encouraging their stupidity... What kind of fetish are you cultivating? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:14pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:10pm:
What? You might blow it all if a Musk or an Epstein flashed their peepers at you?? You know, for every one he reeled in, there'd be thousands of people who weren't taken in by Epstein's schtick... Sam Harris, Eric Weinstein, Steven Pinker... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:19pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:14pm:
Clearly Epstein was able to get people far more intelligent then me to trust him . I'm humble enough to recognize that If you want to be arrogant, be my guest . I'd like to know how he did it |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:21pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:08pm:
Not if you use it the way you just attempted to wield this concept. Personal truths are experiential and interpretive, objective truths are factual and verifiable. The notion of "personal truth" does not erase provable reality, it merely operates on a different plane. When you deploy this excuse to shield someone from accountability for a false claim, you are being disingenuous and acting in bad faith, yet again. If you are serious about being a better student, I would suggest you stop trying to shoehorn and exploit these concepts to fit a predetermined narrative, one you've already decided the outcome of, and allow it to shape you and your opinions. Until then, misusing these concepts will only expose you as a fraud, either someone who doesn't actually understand what they're talking about, or someone acting in bad faith, trying to con those willing to engage. Kids are particularly adept at spotting this, especially the young ones. They may not grasp your words, but they sense your intent, and that's the giveaway. I'm sure you've seen that glint of distrust in them before and know exactly what I mean, even if you won't admit it. But I applaud your "always learning" attitude, but I question your methods and motivations. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:24pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:19pm:
Gawd almighty... They didn't trust Epstein... A standing cock has no brains or conscience... And they wanted something too dangerous to get just off the street... And he could set it up such that they thought... y'know.. a bit of plausible deniability... 'I was only on Epstein's island to study him, Your Honour... but, one thing led to another, and he tricked me into f~cking a kid' |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:41pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:24pm:
You'd think Scoot, as someone so obsessed with the sex lives of young men during COVID that he even advocated that women should not be able to reject their advances, wouldn't be so naive to that fact... Perhaps he should return to his "studies"... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:43pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 9th, 2026 at 5:40pm:
My initial thoughts were how many more high profile contacts Epstein could have had if he wasn't using his spare time to recruit young girls for prostitution. Yes he was running a prostitution ring Virginia said she was paid $20K for having sex with Andrew twice. He also used these girls to recruit other girls Virginia admitted to recruiting other girls which made her complicit. There is the old advertising sayin sex sells which could be why a lot of these people were associated with Epstein. The money is worth following he paid $1 for his NY mansion and was leasing his ranch for a couple of hundred a year. Many Russian connections as well. Bill Gates was mentioned for getting a STD from a Russian. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:50pm
I just find it astonishing that people aren't triggered by what Epstein and Maxwell did, or by what even the redacted files reveal.
Looking at the size of the feet and the shoes in those redacted images, they were unmistakably children. Bloody children. It's unforgivable. If this doesn't make you consider what you'd do to protect your own children from this, or what you'd do to Epstein if you knew your toddler daughter was in those photos, there's something profoundly wrong with you. And to go so far as to admire his methods, to want to understand and emulate them, to wish to meet him… it's utterly incomprehensible. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:50pm:
You make up your retarded fantasies and then huff andd puff about them. Ludicrous. You are either lying and slandering on purpose or you are really so stupid as to believe your own made up propaganda. I am tipping both. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Baronvonrort on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:36pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:50pm:
I find it astonishing leftards can turn a blind eye to Islamic Pedos and even defend them by calling those who bring it up Islamophobes. We saw in the UK lefties shutting down any talk of the numerous grooming gangs with girls younger than Epsteins victims so they didn't appear racist. Many Islamic countries allow child brides Nujood Ali from Yemen became well known for getting a divorce aged 10. Iraq recently lowered age to 9 for girls to get married and the Taliban also allow child brides. I don't see any evidence Epsteins victims were Prepubescent yet marrieg and having sex with prepubescent girls has been common in Islamic society for over 1400 years. The lyrics with this song nail it with Islamic pedos yet leftards like sadskip will call it Islamophobic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOz9fPD49us Lots of high profile Gulf Arabs named in Epstein files. Yemen_009.jpg (166 KB | 0
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:49pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm:
It's in Scoots post, go read it again dick head. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by ProudKangaroo on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:51pm Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:36pm:
I can't speak for everyone, but I think it's safe to say that we're not turning a blind eye to it. It is a practice that should be stopped, and those doing it should be brought to justice. There is no excuse for child abuse. What does your examples have to do with Epstein? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:58pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 2:08pm:
He's right, Sad. Aquascoot lives in a world where pedos are big swinging Alphas who should be protected at all costs. Rule of law, innit. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:03pm ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:51pm:
Epstein was supplying underage girls to the middle east for the umpteenth time A valid passport with a Saudi residence, a 2016 trip to the Arabian peninsula, and a framed picture of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in his Manhattan mansion have raised more questions than answers about Jeffrey Epstein’s connections to the oil-rich kingdom. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:05pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 3:33pm:
Not at all, dear boy. You're on record as worshipping Jeff's best friend and partner-in-crime. You want Ghislaine pardoned, the erection rigged, and DL in power for FOUR MORE YEARS. Ever get the feeling you've been fingered? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:14pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:03pm:
Those Saudis weren't in the middle east, you silly old thing, they were in Trump Tower, where the majority of Mohammed's friends have their pads. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:18pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:03pm:
So, what else is there to... 'study'? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:19pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:05pm:
Bint Saddo has learned it all from you and gweggy. You are the cat and the fox to her Pinocchio. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:23pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:18pm:
Their methods, Meister. While the leftie intellectuals are all off studying language or yarts or inferior culture or whatever, Aquascoot wants them to study the things that matter. You know, how to get more chicks, the younger the better. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:25pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:19pm:
And you are Aquascoot's muse, dear boy. As an artist, I hear he's quite the smearer. You? images__1___12_.jpeg (42 KB | 0
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:31pm
Shurely shome mishtake.
images__1___13_.jpeg (35 KB | 0
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:32pm
Finished.
images__1___14_.jpeg (35 KB | 0
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:37pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:18pm:
I would suggest you read The Prince and the 49 laws to power Understanding manipulation stops you being an easy "mark" |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:38pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:37pm:
How old are you? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:44pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:37pm:
One might suggest you read the Prince too, dear. If you did, you'd understand it's meant to be "ironic". You know - like your DL's trials of bleach to do a number on the lungs. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:43pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:44pm:
It's not ironic at all . You haven't studied it have you. Donny has The Relevance of The Prince to Modern Politics Even though The Prince was written in 1513, its ideas still show up everywhere in modern politics — from election campaigns to international diplomacy. Here’s how: 1️⃣ Image Management & Political Branding Machiavelli said a ruler must appear virtuous — even if they aren’t. Today: Politicians carefully craft public images. Media teams manage messaging and damage control. Appearances of strength, empathy, or patriotism are strategic tools. Modern campaigns are less about pure policy and more about perception management, which is deeply Machiavellian. 2️⃣ “Better to Be Feared Than Loved” In international politics especially: Powerful countries use military strength as deterrence. Leaders project toughness to avoid appearing weak. Sanctions, military drills, and strategic threats reinforce authority. Fear creates compliance — but Machiavelli warned: never become hated. Modern leaders who cross that line often face revolt, impeachment, or international backlash. 3️⃣ Realism in Foreign Policy Machiavelli is considered an early thinker of political realism — the idea that: States act in their own self-interest. Morality is secondary to survival. Power determines outcomes. Modern international relations theory (Realism) echoes this: Alliances shift based on interest. Countries justify morally questionable actions as “national security.” 4️⃣ Control Through Stability Machiavelli believed a ruler’s top job is maintaining order and stability. Today: Governments justify surveillance for security. Emergency powers are used during crises. Strong executive authority is defended as necessary for stability. This reflects his belief that disorder is worse than harsh rule. 5️⃣ Strategic Use of Crisis Machiavelli believed crises are opportunities for bold action. Modern examples: Leaders pushing major reforms during emergencies. Expanding executive power during wars or pandemics. Using instability to consolidate authority. Crises test a leader’s virtù — their decisiveness and skill. 6️⃣ Populism & Power Consolidation Many modern populist leaders use Machiavellian tactics: Position themselves as strong saviors. Undermine institutions that threaten their power. Reward loyal supporters. Control narratives through media. Machiavelli advised rulers to weaken rivals and secure loyalty — strategies still visible today. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:44pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 4:38pm:
You are trying to manipulate me into revealing personal details Thanks to my studying manipulators, I shall decline |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:51pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
Sorry, dear, my bad. I thought you said you'd read the book. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:54pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:51pm:
Certainly have. Ive been to florence as well. And it's not ironic , you need to get out more |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:20pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:44pm:
No, that question was rhetorical. You may be a boomer, as you've told us... but your developmental age? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:23pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
All the insight you'd learn as a teenager from peers and getting out of the sh!t... Did you really need The Prince to clue you up? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by aquascoot on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:26pm
R
MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:23pm:
We're not all as smart as you meister. Some of us can increase our wisdom by reading the classics |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:35pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:26pm:
This is not about smart, it's about machiavellianism - one of the Big 4 Dark Personality traits and the one that most teenagers instinctively get a handle on, if they're to survive the school playground with at least some dignity and status. And just to ram home the point, it's not exclusive to humans... Chimps, baboons and other primates also instinctively develop Machiavellian traits. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:07pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 6:35pm:
Ridiculous. You are a ridiculous, simple yet tendentious bozo. An example of a little learning smeared across a massive ignorarce. It takes a laughable idiot of Bwiyawnesque, Doctor of Divinity proportions to equate a renaissance study in princely power politics to primate behaviour. Ludicrous. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:11pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:07pm:
As you're homosexual, your bitchy explosions are inevitable sooner rather than later. What is it with you and your fetish for Queensland men? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:16pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:11pm:
Here we go - mr mystical intellectual goes all homo when he is disagreed with. Ridiculous ludicrous is correct. Weak, stupid, touchy. Simple |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:22pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:16pm:
Was it bad memories of the playground that got your gay dander up? |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:36pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:22pm:
You are ridiculous, pal. Any disagreement with you and you go all gay about it. You have a little learning and expand it to a blinkered, tendentious certainty of the dilettante. Just how much of a half baked wannabe you are is shown by your response to ANY disagreement with you. If you were really learned you would marshal your reason. But you are just a little blow hard pustule with delusions of being wise and deep like Master Echard's wisdom. But all you can marshal is gay talk. Ludicrous. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:53pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:36pm:
Yep... bad memories of the schoolyard, eh! Bitchy, effeminate behaviour will do that. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by greggerypeccary on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:01pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:53pm:
Frank doth protest too much. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:12pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:53pm:
Any disagreement with you and you go all gay about it. Don't avoid the point. Creepy onanist gweggg rallying to you should give you pause. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:15pm Frank wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:12pm:
Keep bitchin, old girl. |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Melanias purse on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:19pm MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 8:11pm:
That's a tough one, Meister. Maybe it's the wrist action - the old boy's always had a penchant for that kind of thing. You need to study him. images__1___15_.jpeg (21 KB | 0
) |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by Frank on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:24pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:19pm:
And the pedestrian shuffles in.... |
|
Title: Re: Studying Epstein Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:31pm Melanias purse wrote on Feb 11th, 2026 at 9:19pm:
Orrgh yeah... nah, nah, nah, nah, nah,,, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqgSYEy9hJc |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |