maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

You are wasting your time pointing out the hypocrisy of the cult members on here, they dont care they will just go along with whatever trump wants, just like mindless sheep.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

Their political figures are now taking it a step further, "If you comply, you will not die."

Imagine if that standard had been applied on 6 January. If the insurrectionists had been decisively shut down instead of indulged, there would have been no second Trump act at all. But he was never held accountable for his role in the insurrection, and this time the people around him are making sure he doesn't repeat what they see as a mistake in not taking it all the way.

They aren't even attempting to conceal the authoritarianism anymore. The rhetoric is explicit, the intent is obvious, and the conditioning of the public is being done out in the open.

Kamala was right.

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that.

Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself??

Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October.

Dreadful.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful.

What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success?

80%+?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+?

The task of immigration law enforcement is to enforce immigration Law. ICE is tasked with removing illegal aliens from the US.

This includes but is not resstricted to illegal aliens whohave committed additional offences, beyond violating immigration law.


SOme stats.

https://www.ice.gov/statistics

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:36pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:24pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+? The task of immigration law enforcement is to enforce immigration Law. ICE is tasked with removing illegal aliens from the US. This includes but is not resstricted to illegal aliens whohave committed additional offences, beyond violating immigration law. SOme stats. https://www.ice.gov/statistics

Don't want to answer?

Avoidance.


Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 12:52pm:

Be seated.

Indeed.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Prove it.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:40pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:36pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:24pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+? The task of immigration law enforcement is to enforce immigration Law. ICE is tasked with removing illegal aliens from the US. This includes but is not resstricted to illegal aliens whohave committed additional offences, beyond violating immigration law. SOme stats. https://www.ice.gov/statistics Don't want to answer? Avoidance. Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Be seated. Indeed.

I gave you the answer and I gave you a link ti the stats.

WHat part don't you undertsand?

'Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.'

Renee Good the domestic terrorist won't be on the street now.
Jonathan Ross will be.

'The deputy attorney general, Todd Blanche, appeared to allude to the coming investigation in a statement on X earlier this week.

“Minnesota insurrection is a direct result of a FAILED governor and a TERRIBLE mayor encouraging violence against law enforcement,” Blanche tweeted. “It’s disgusting. Walz and Frey – I’m focused on stopping YOU from your terrorism by whatever means necessary. This is not a threat. It’s a promise.”
Trump has repeatedly directed the justice department to pursue criminal investigations and prosecutions against his political opponents since retaking office last year.'

The terrorism is saying troops can refuse illegal orders.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:51pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:40pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:36pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:24pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+? The task of immigration law enforcement is to enforce immigration Law. ICE is tasked with removing illegal aliens from the US. This includes but is not resstricted to illegal aliens whohave committed additional offences, beyond violating immigration law. SOme stats. https://www.ice.gov/statistics Don't want to answer? Avoidance. Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Be seated. Indeed. I gave you the answer and I gave you a link ti the stats. WHat part don't you undertsand?

I asked you what percentage of those they've detained would need to match that description to prove this has been ICE's focus or that they've successfully met that aim.

Well?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 2:29pm:

I asked you what percentage of those they've detained would need to match that description to prove this has been ICE's focus or that they've successfully met that aim. Well?

Immigration Enforcement
Securing our nation's borders and safeguarding the integrity of our immigration system is a primary focus of ICE officers and agents throughout the country. Immigration enforcement is the largest single area of responsibility for ERO and is a critical component of the overall safety, security, and well-being of our nation.

While ERO has significant assets near the border, the majority of its immigration enforcement mission takes place in the interior of the country. To accomplish ICE's important immigration enforcement objectives, ERO coordinates closely with law enforcement partners within the U.S. and around the world. One of the most notable law enforcement coordination and partnership efforts within ERO involves the biometric and biographic identification of priority undocumented aliens who are incarcerated within federal, state, and local prisons and jails.

ERO works with law enforcement partners in the shared responsibility for ensuring the safety of our communities through a variety resources and programs. The 287(g) program enables a state or local law enforcement entity to receive delegated authority, training, and technology resources for immigration enforcement within their jurisdictions. ICE's Law Enforcement Support Center coordinates response and enforcement actions with law enforcement partners using biometrics to identify foreign-born individuals arrested for criminal offenses.

ERO also enhances the impact of multi-agency task forces through its administrative authority to arrest individuals deemed a threat to public safety on their unlawful immigration status without additional criminal charges. Finally, leveraging resources available through foreign law enforcement partners including INTERPOL and the ICE Attaché corps, ERO develops investigative leads and provides support in locating and arresting foreign nationals wanted for crimes committed abroad who are now at-large in the U.S.

Browse through the "Immigration Enforcement" drop-down menu to learn more.

https://www.ice.gov/mission

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+?

2,500 in 5 weeks in one state is pretty significant, whatever percentage it is of the total illegals removed in the same period.

Removed by ICE from the US : 100 % are illegals.  Illegal = no right to be in the country >>>> remove from the country.


What else don't you understand?

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 3:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:24pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+? 2,500 in 5 weeks in one state is pretty significant, whatever percentage it is of the total illegals removed in the same period. Removed by ICE from the US : 100 % are illegals.  Illegal = no right to be in the country >>>> remove from the country. What else don't you understand?

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 3:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:24pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. What percentage of all the people detained by ICE would need to be these "Killers, rapists, human traffickers" you speak of for us to consider it to be either the primary focus of the ICE ramp-up policy, or for us to gauge it as a success? 80%+? 2,500 in 5 weeks in one state ...

There's no proof of that happening.

Absolutely none.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Prove it.

Frank: can you prove it?

:-* :-/
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:45pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Prove it. Frank: can you prove it?

The question was, dreadful liar:

Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that.

Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself??

Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October.

Dreadful.


Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims?
Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:05pm:

:-* :-/ greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:06pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:45pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Prove it. Frank: can you prove it? The question was, dreadful liar: Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims? Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action?

I'll take that as a 'no'.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:21pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:05pm: :-* :-/ greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:06pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:45pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 1:08pm: Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 Prove it. Frank: can you prove it? The question was, dreadful liar: Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens?   Never a word from you mongs on that. Why?  Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself?? Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out.  Another effect of 7 October. Dreadful. Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims? Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action? I'll take that as a 'no'.

Well, lying creep, you and the TDS kids are our eyes and ears for what the lefty media like CNN cover on ICE and none of you have ever once brought up the benefits of removing illegals, especially criminal illegals, as discussed on CNN et al.  So I assume that they are not covering it at all, otherwise you would be telling us about it, wouldn't you?

You wouldnt be applying your own, additional lefty propagandist filter and focus, obsessively, just on the bollocks, would you?

Of course you would. That is thed whole point of your existence, ditto all the TDs  kids. You are just the creepiest, most dishonest of the lot.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?


What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

I'd imagine at least a 50% rste would be the bare minimum, for any scenario.

But it depends on the situation of course.  If I were a chef and I only got 80% of the orders correct, I wouldn't be a good chef...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:37pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball. 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what?

It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:42am: maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic. maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed. . @TriciaOhio  : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are." Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration. https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410 ..................

there is a cultists reply

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:37pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball. 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

I guess you're too dumb to proceed.

Shocker...

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:37pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball. 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

What about these percentages?

“We’re gonna be reducing drug prices down to a level that nobody – not by 20%, 30% – by like 1,000%. Because, you know, we’re paying sometimes 10 times more than other nations, and we’re not doing it anymore.” He said Monday: “We have something else called ‘favored nations,’ where I’m going to be reducing drug prices by 1,000% – by 900, 600, 500, 1,200.”

Please explain.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18^th, 2026 at 7:08am:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:43pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:37pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball. 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages. What about these percentages? “We’re gonna be reducing drug prices down to a level that nobody – not by 20%, 30% – by like 1,000%. Because, you know, we’re paying sometimes 10 times more than other nations, and we’re not doing it anymore.” He said Monday: “We have something else called ‘favored nations,’ where I’m going to be reducing drug prices by 1,000% – by 900, 600, 500, 1,200.” Please explain.

Stay with ICE, despicable creep.

Frank wrote on Jan 18^th, 2026 at 9:56am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18th, 2026 at 7:08am: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:43pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:37pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 6:50pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 5:20pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 4:04pm: You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets. So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific. In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting? What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting? And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success? 80%? What about the standard pass mark, 50%? Surely you don't need to keep running from this question? Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank. Why does the percentage matter?  ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task. I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that. No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported. I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim. And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer. Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken... If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions. But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return. Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been? What baseline, what 'this claim'? You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance? What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens? What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball. 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages. What about these percentages? “We’re gonna be reducing drug prices down to a level that nobody – not by 20%, 30% – by like 1,000%. Because, you know, we’re paying sometimes 10 times more than other nations, and we’re not doing it anymore.” He said Monday: “We have something else called ‘favored nations,’ where I’m going to be reducing drug prices by 1,000% – by 900, 600, 500, 1,200.” Please explain. Stay with ICE, despicable creep.

White (supremacist) flag accepted.

If a prescription drug which used to cost $50 is reduced by 1,000%, what's the new price?

I'm curious.

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

So, teapot, have you ceded your question to evil liar creep to wank and ejaculate all over the place - or does your question still stand about ICE? In which case clarify the significance of 50 or 80 or whatever % you are on about as regards whatever it is that you are questoning.

Frank wrote on Jan 18^th, 2026 at 8:10pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:43pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages. So, teapot, have you ceded your question to evil liar creep to wank and ejaculate all over the place - or does your question still stand about ICE? In which case clarify the significance of 50 or 80 or whatever % you are on about as regards whatever it is that you are questoning.

Frank, you're the one having a sook about CNN supposedly failing to report on all the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets.

I asked you two very straightforward questions, both of which you're conspicuously refusing to answer.

First, out of everyone ICE has detained, in your view, what proportion would need to be "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before the issue becomes sufficiently noteworthy to justify national media coverage?

Second, by complaining about the lack of reporting, you're implicitly asserting that ICE's objective was to target "killers, rapists, human traffickers". So again, in your opinion, what proportion of detainees would need to fall into those categories before you could reasonably claim that they were the primary targets and that ICE has been successfully achieving that aim?

I gave illustrative percentages, not as a multiple-choice quiz, but as prompts. They have no intrinsic significance. The only thing that matters here is what you think the answers to those two questions are, and so far you've avoided committing to any answer at all.

We've somehow gone from this being so self-evidently important that you're shedding tears over it not being reported, to pretending the underlying numbers don't matter in the slightest.

All because you were asked to articulate your own position?

What?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 6:34am:

Frank wrote on Jan 18th, 2026 at 8:10pm: Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:43pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 8:39pm: 80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion. What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what? It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages. So, teapot, have you ceded your question to evil liar creep to wank and ejaculate all over the place - or does your question still stand about ICE? In which case clarify the significance of 50 or 80 or whatever % you are on about as regards whatever it is that you are questoning. Frank, you're the one having a sook about CNN supposedly failing to report on all the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets. I asked you two very straightforward questions, both of which you're conspicuously refusing to answer. First, out of everyone ICE has detained, in your view, what proportion would need to be "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before the issue becomes sufficiently noteworthy to justify national media coverage? Second, by complaining about the lack of reporting, you're implicitly asserting that ICE's objective was to target "killers, rapists, human traffickers". So again, in your opinion, what proportion of detainees would need to fall into those categories before you could reasonably claim that they were the primary targets and that ICE has been successfully achieving that aim? I gave illustrative percentages, not as a multiple-choice quiz, but as prompts. They have no intrinsic significance. The only thing that matters here is what you think the answers to those two questions are, and so far you've avoided committing to any answer at all. We've somehow gone from this being so self-evidently important that you're shedding tears over it not being reported, to pretending the underlying numbers don't matter in the slightest. All because you were asked to articulate your own position? What?

We've done this already a number of times.

ICE is tasked with removing illegal aliens.  Illegal alien = someone with no right to be in the country.  Removing such people is a good thing, REGARDLESS of what proportion of them have warrants for their arrest for criminal activities. That is a very welcome bonus, not the only task.

I don't know where your little mania about percentages comes from other than your attempt to normalise illegal immigration and thereby deligitimise the removal of illegal aliens.


All is explained here, teapot, listen to it:

https://x.com/BarronTNews_/status/2012959361073557761

So you won't answer the questions then?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 10:18am:

So you won't answer the questions then?

I did, a number of times.

Not my fault if yoou are a retard and do not understand the answers.

Frank wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 11:12am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 10:18am: So you won't answer the questions then? I did, a number of times. Not my fault if yoou are a retard and do not understand the answers.

I asked you very specific questions, and while you replied, you refused to answer them.

I don't know why you're so scared to share your views when asked, despite how much you post all the time...

You'll vomit out the most incoherent bullshit, repost Babylon Bee crap, but when asked simple questions as a follow-up to a whinge you had, you'll go days avoiding the questions while being a whiney little bitch.

I don't get it, why even be here if not even scrutiny, but asking for clarification on something you believe is enough to trigger such a tantrum...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 2:50pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 11:12am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 10:18am: So you won't answer the questions then? I did, a number of times. Not my fault if yoou are a retard and do not understand the answers. I asked you very specific questions, and while you replied, you refused to answer them. I don't know why you're so scared to share your views when asked, despite how much you post all the time... You'll vomit out the most incoherent bullshit, repost Babylon Bee crap, but when asked simple questions as a follow-up to a whinge you had, you'll go days avoiding the questions while being a whiney little bitch. I don't get it, why even be here if not even scrutiny, but asking for clarification on something you believe is enough to trigger such a tantrum...

I told you, retard, that the percentages do not matter.

Q. So what pervcenatge is..... [your question here]
A. Percentages do not matter.


What don't you understand? Whaat percentage, what number do you want me to  give you if I think and as I have said repeatedly, that percentages do not matter.


You need to adjust your hormone dosage....

Frank wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:01pm:

I told you, retard, that the percentages do not matter.

Exactly.

You didn't answer the question, you just declared that it "didn't matter".

You're unwilling, or unable, to articulate what you actually believe. I'm not even asking you to defend it, merely to state it. That reluctance speaks volumes.

This sort of evasiveness used to be a trait largely confined to Light around here, yet now you seem determined to emulate it. It's not a good look.

YOU are the one carrying on about CNN supposedly failing to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets. You introduced this framing.

So I'm asking you a very simple, very direct question: out of all the people ICE has detained, how many, in your view, need to fall into that category of "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before it becomes newsworthy enough to report on?

I've deliberately framed this as a percentage of total detainees, because that's what is statistically meaningful given the ever-increasing number of detentions. Absolute numbers, in isolation, are intellectually lazy and analytically useless.

And yet, apparently, even this is too much to ask.

Do you really have so little confidence in your own beliefs that you won't even state them out loud?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:17pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:01pm: I told you, retard, that the percentages do not matter. Exactly. You didn't answer the question, you just declared that it "didn't matter". You're unwilling, or unable, to articulate what you actually believe. I'm not even asking you to defend it, merely to state it. That reluctance speaks volumes. This sort of evasiveness used to be a trait largely confined to Light around here, yet now you seem determined to emulate it. It's not a good look. YOU are the one carrying on about CNN supposedly failing to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets. You introduced this framing. So I'm asking you a very simple, very direct question: out of all the people ICE has detained, how many, in your view, need to fall into that category of "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before it becomes newsworthy enough to report on? I've deliberately framed this as a percentage of total detainees, because that's what is statistically meaningful given the ever-increasing number of detentions. Absolute numbers, in isolation, are intellectually lazy and analytically useless. And yet, apparently, even this is too much to ask. Do you really have so little confidence in your own beliefs that you won't even state them out loud?

Sorry, what was the question?🙃



https://www.ice.gov/statistics

Frank wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:22pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:17pm: Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:01pm: I told you, retard, that the percentages do not matter. Exactly. You didn't answer the question, you just declared that it "didn't matter". You're unwilling, or unable, to articulate what you actually believe. I'm not even asking you to defend it, merely to state it. That reluctance speaks volumes. This sort of evasiveness used to be a trait largely confined to Light around here, yet now you seem determined to emulate it. It's not a good look. YOU are the one carrying on about CNN supposedly failing to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets. You introduced this framing. So I'm asking you a very simple, very direct question: out of all the people ICE has detained, how many, in your view, need to fall into that category of "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before it becomes newsworthy enough to report on? I've deliberately framed this as a percentage of total detainees, because that's what is statistically meaningful given the ever-increasing number of detentions. Absolute numbers, in isolation, are intellectually lazy and analytically useless. And yet, apparently, even this is too much to ask. Do you really have so little confidence in your own beliefs that you won't even state them out loud? Sorry, what was the question?🙃

Too scared to engage.

And it's not even to defend, but just state something you believe, something you brought up.

Take a seat Frank, you're cooked.


ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:40pm:

Don't want to answer? Avoidance. Frank wrote on Jan 17th, 2026 at 12:52pm: Be seated. Indeed.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:17pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:01pm: I told you, retard, that the percentages do not matter. Exactly. You didn't answer the question, you just declared that it "didn't matter". You're unwilling, or unable, to articulate what you actually believe. I'm not even asking you to defend it, merely to state it. That reluctance speaks volumes. This sort of evasiveness used to be a trait largely confined to Light around here, yet now you seem determined to emulate it. It's not a good look. YOU are the one carrying on about CNN supposedly failing to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" that ICE has taken off the streets. You introduced this framing. So I'm asking you a very simple, very direct question: out of all the people ICE has detained, how many, in your view, need to fall into that category of "killers, rapists, human traffickers" before it becomes newsworthy enough to report on? I've deliberately framed this as a percentage of total detainees, because that's what is statistically meaningful given the ever-increasing number of detentions. Absolute numbers, in isolation, are intellectually lazy and analytically useless. And yet, apparently, even this is too much to ask. Do you really have so little confidence in your own beliefs that you won't even state them out loud?

They're not really his own beliefs.

It's what he's been told to think and to believe.

These MAGA cult members don't have a mind of their own.

Frank is one of Trump's Mitläufer.

January 10, 2026

ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers
Criminal illegal immigrants had deportation orders dating back decades

FIRST ON FOX: ICE officials on Saturday released a shocking list of the "worst of the worst" criminal illegal immigrants arrested during their recent surge in the sanctuary state of Minnesota, including child rapists and nearly a dozen killers.

ICE told Fox News the criminal illegal immigrants were roaming freely in Minnesota prior to their recent arrests, and they are the type of people Democratic politicians and activists are referring to as their "neighbors" as they attempt to interfere with ICE.

"Regardless of staged political theatrics, ICE is going to continue to arrest the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens in Minnesota and elsewhere," ICE Director Todd M. Lyons wrote in a statement. "Some of these criminal aliens have had final orders of removal for 30 years, but they’ve been free to terrorize Minnesotans."

"ICE’s arrests prevent recidivism and make communities safer, but it feels like local politicians want to ignore that part and drum up discontent rather than protect their own constituents," he added.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt reacted to the arrests on X Saturday, calling the convicts "sick people."  "This is why we have ICE Agents," Leavitt wrote in the post. "May God Bless them for their thankless work to protect American communities from these sick people."

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) posted a photo of a plane on X Saturday captioned, "Lawbreakers going wheels up in Minneapolis."

Some of the "worst of the worst" criminal illegal immigrants arrested in Minnesota include:

Sriudorn Phaivan, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of strong-arm sodomy of a boy and strong-arm sodomy of a girl, another aggravated sex offense, nine counts of larceny, unauthorized use of a vehicle, four counts of fraud, vehicle theft, two counts of drug possession, obstructing justice, possession of stolen property, receiving stolen property, burglary and check forgery.
He also has pending charges for two counts of receiving stolen property, flight to avoid prosecution or confinement and burglary. Phaivan has had a deportation order since 2018.


Tou Vang, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of sexual assault and sodomy of a girl under the age of 13, and procuring a child for prostitution. Vang has had a deportation order since 2006.

Chong Vue, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of the strong-arm rape of a 12-year-old girl and kidnapping a child with intent to sexually assault her.  Vue has had a deportation order since 2004.

Ge Yang, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of strong-arm rape, aggravated assault with a weapon and strangulation. Yang has had a deportation order since 2012.

Pao Choua Xiong, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of rape and child fondling.  Xiong has had a deportation order since 2003.

Kou Lor, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of rape, rape with a weapon and sexual assault. Lor has had a deportation order since 1996.

Hernan Cortes-Valencia, a Mexican illegal immigrant, was convicted of sexual assault of a child and DUI.  Cortes-Valencia has had a deportation order since 2016.

Abdirashid Adosh Elmi, a Somalian illegal immigrant, was convicted of homicide.

Gilberto Salguero Landaverde, a Salvadoran illegal immigrant, was convicted of three counts of homicide.

Gabriel Figueroa Gama, a Mexican illegal immigrant, was convicted of homicide. Gama was previously deported in 2002.

Galuak Michael Rotgai, a Sudanese illegal immigrant, was convicted of homicide.

Thai Lor, a Laotian illegal immigrant, was convicted of two counts of homicide.  Lor has had a deportation order since 2009.


Mariana Sia Kanu, an illegal immigrant from Sierra Leone, was convicted of two counts of homicide.  Kanu has had a deportation order since 2022.

Aldrin Guerrero Munoz, a Mexican illegal immigrant, was convicted of homicide.  Munoz has had a deportation order since 2015.

Abdirashid Mohamed Ahmed, a Somalian illegal immigrant, was convicted of manslaughter.  Ahmed has had a deportation order since 2022.

Mongong Kual Maniang Deng, a Sudanese illegal immigrant, was convicted of attempt to commit homicide, weapon possession and DUI.

Aler Gomez Lucas, a Guatemalan illegal immigrant, was convicted of negligent homicide with a vehicle and DUI.   Lucas has had a deportation order since 2022.

Shwe Htoo, a Burmese illegal immigrant, was convicted of negligent homicide.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ice-arrests-minnesota-surge-include-numerous-convicted-child-rapists-killers

Frank wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:47pm:

January 10, 2026 ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers Criminal illegal immigrants had deportation orders dating back decades

Zero evidence to support this claim.

None.

Why would anyone believe cowards in masks?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:57pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:47pm: January 10, 2026 ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers Criminal illegal immigrants had deportation orders dating back decades Zero evidence to support this claim. None. Why would anyone believe cowards in masks?

https://www.ice.gov/news/releases/ice-arrests-dozens-criminal-illegal-aliens-convicted-murder-child-rape-and-more

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 19^th, 2026 at 3:57pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 19th, 2026 at 3:47pm: January 10, 2026 ICE arrests in Minnesota surge include numerous convicted child rapists, killers Criminal illegal immigrants had deportation orders dating back decades Zero evidence to support this claim. None. Why would anyone believe cowards in masks?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G--yMroX0AAMVR7?.jpg