Donald Trump on The Conversation


A masterclass on letting people have their own truth [e.g. PC, WOKE, etc, in government],
and then watching reality, inevitably, 'spank them',
when in time, the 'fruits' of their [faux] 'truths' appear [i.e. come home to bite them].

But we must pity the poor people [the 'majority'] who must suffer the consequences of such ardent foolishness [of those imposed 'nuts' policies of PC, WOKE, etc, when in government].


"....wisdom is justified of her children."


.


@ 20.45  [Donald Trump.....rebukes Dasha Burns accusation, 'what you have laid out for Europe']
"I have no vision for Europe. All i want to see, is a strong Europe."


President Donald Trump | The Conversation

45 min
Dec 9, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVV1tbNZf_A


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVV1tbNZf_A



Quote:

President Donald Trump sat down with POLITICO's Dasha Burns for this week’s episode of The Conversation for a 45-minute exchange about his influence on Europe, major American policy challenges and the future of the GOP.

.


Proverbs 29:2
When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn.


John 15:10
If ye keep my commandments, ye shall abide in my love;
even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.
11  These things have I spoken unto you,
that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.


Proverbs 3:1
My son, forget not my law; but let thine heart keep my commandments:
2  For length of days, and long life, and peace, shall they add to thee.


Deuteronomy 30:15
See, I have set before thee this day life and good, and death and evil;
16  In that I command thee this day to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments, that thou mayest live and multiply: and the LORD thy God shall bless thee in the land whither thou goest to possess it.
17  But if thine heart turn away, so that thou wilt not hear, but shalt be drawn away, and worship other gods, and serve them;
18  I denounce unto you this day, that ye shall surely perish, and that ye shall not prolong your days upon the land, whither thou passest over Jordan to go to possess it.
19  I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live:
20  That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him: for he is thy life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.


Hebrews 10:16
This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
17  And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.

Dear Yadda,
many blessings.

Your posts are so long that I doubt anyone reads them -

make them short and punchy.

forgiven

namaste

A masterclass on being completely inept, talking in cliches, having no idea what's going on in the world, not even what his own staff are doing.

His answer to the Ukraine war? Never would have happened if he was prez. The reason for that? The 2020 election was stolen from him - the same old lines he's been repeating for four years.

He's a negotiator, it's just what he does. Vlad respects him. Vlad, the guy who read the Kremlin report in 2016 that Trump was so mentally unstable, he was the perfect choice for prez.

Today, Vlad has a puppet in the White House who shares his view of Europe as the common enemy, and yes, it's starting to look like he'll pull the US out of NATO altogether.

A demented rant from an inept puppet. The only hope for the pax Americana is the 2026 mid-terms.

STOP THE STEAL !!!

Bobby. wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:01am:

Dear Yadda, many blessings. Your posts are so long that I doubt anyone reads them - make them short and punchy. forgiven namaste

It's not that nobody read his posts, although I shouldn't pretend to speak for the entire audience.

I read what he wrote, and it's pure spin. Just more cope from a MAGA supporter struggling to keep the faith and "trust the plan".

That's probably why nobody else has bothered to reply. To call that interview a "masterclass" means Yadda has already made the conscious choice to discard reality in favour of whatever narrative flatters his worldview.

There's no point engaging with that. He'll simply ignore anything that isn't uncritically positive about Trump's interview, regardless of how substantive or well sourced the critique is.

To his credit, he's not quite as childish or abusive as some in that cohort when challenged. I'll give him that much.

Take Trump's comments about Europe. He described European countries as "decaying", labelled their leaders "weak", and claimed many won't be "viable" if current migration trends continue.

Putting aside the obvious racist dogwhistling baked into that framing, has he actually looked at what's happening in the US under Trump, right now? Talk about "not viable". Trump is bailing out American farmers, again, because of his tariffs, again.

Inflation is up, layoffs are up, affordability from basic supplies to vital services, housing etc, all more expensive, and all of it is because of Trump's policies.

He's hiding the employment numbers, the GDP figures, and the inflation data. And we all know he only buries information when it makes him look bad, just like his tax returns, just like his school grades, just like the Epstein files.

If it was good he's be releasing it, just like he did the footage of the Navy blowing up the boats, inadvertantly opening the door to the investigation uncovering his war crimes, all because he wanted to boast he'd done something good.

So clearly, the numbers he's hiding are terrible.

His praise for hard line leaders like Viktor Orbán on immigration is another tell. Trump actively endorses illiberal, ultranationalist styles of governance, which signals a foreign policy that prioritises power, exclusion and ethnic hierarchy over alliances of democracies. It's the exact opposite of the values that the so called "leader of the free world" is supposed to represent.

He claimed Europe "talks but doesn't produce", and suggested that Russia has "the upper hand" in Ukraine. Then he added the absurd notion that Ukraine should hold elections immediately, despite the obvious reality that democracies normally delay elections during full scale war.

That sort of rhetoric undermines support for a sovereign nation fighting for survival, and broadcasts to the world that Trump is happy to toss aside democratic norms whenever it suits his personal or political convenience.

As for his "A plus plus plus" fantasy about the US economy, it's not even worth unpacking. It's self promoting nonsense from someone who relies on ignorance to survive politically.

If anything was a "masterclass", it was a lesson in telling MAGA exactly what they want to hear, no matter how detached from reality it is. On that narrow metric, sure, he excelled. But it was all bullshit, lies and fabrications.

It still astounds me how completely MAGA have abandoned the idea of "facts over feelings". They cling to whatever lie makes them feel like they're winning, regardless of what is actually happening in the real world.

When you face off against that, there's no changing minds, there's no spirited debate.  It's best to leave those lunatics alone in their echo chambers, which I suspect is why most have been smarter than me and just ignored this thread.

Karnal wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 12:08pm:

A masterclass on being completely inept, talking in cliches, having no idea what's going on in the world, not even what his own staff are doing. His answer to the Ukraine war? Never would have happened if he was prez. The reason for that? The 2020 election was stolen from him - the same old lines he's been repeating for four years. He's a negotiator, it's just what he does. Vlad respects him. Vlad, the guy who read the Kremlin report in 2016 that Trump was so mentally unstable, he was the perfect choice for prez. Today, Vlad has a puppet in the White House who shares his view of Europe as the common enemy, and yes, it's starting to look like he'll pull the US out of NATO altogether. A demented rant from an inept puppet. The only hope for the pax Americana is the 2026 mid-terms. STOP THE STEAL !!!

Stop the steal?

Yes, pulling the US out of NATO will stop the Europeans stealing from the American taxpayer

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 12:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:01am: Dear Yadda, many blessings. Your posts are so long that I doubt anyone reads them - make them short and punchy. forgiven namaste It's not that nobody read his posts, although I shouldn't pretend to speak for the entire audience. I read what he wrote, and it's pure spin. Just more cope from a MAGA supporter struggling to keep the faith and "trust the plan". That's probably why nobody else has bothered to reply. To call that interview a "masterclass" means Yadda has already made the conscious choice to discard reality in favour of whatever narrative flatters his worldview. There's no point engaging with that. He'll simply ignore anything that isn't uncritically positive about Trump's interview, regardless of how substantive or well sourced the critique is. To his credit, he's not quite as childish or abusive as some in that cohort when challenged. I'll give him that much. Take Trump's comments about Europe. He described European countries as "decaying", labelled their leaders "weak", and claimed many won't be "viable" if current migration trends continue. Putting aside the obvious racist dogwhistling baked into that framing, has he actually looked at what's happening in the US under Trump, right now? Talk about "not viable". Trump is bailing out American farmers, again, because of his tariffs, again. Inflation is up, layoffs are up, affordability from basic supplies to vital services, housing etc, all more expensive, and all of it is because of Trump's policies. He's hiding the employment numbers, the GDP figures, and the inflation data. And we all know he only buries information when it makes him look bad, just like his tax returns, just like his school grades, just like the Epstein files. If it was good he's be releasing it, just like he did the footage of the Navy blowing up the boats, inadvertantly opening the door to the investigation uncovering his war crimes, all because he wanted to boast he'd done something good. So clearly, the numbers he's hiding are terrible. His praise for hard line leaders like Viktor Orbán on immigration is another tell. Trump actively endorses illiberal, ultranationalist styles of governance, which signals a foreign policy that prioritises power, exclusion and ethnic hierarchy over alliances of democracies. It's the exact opposite of the values that the so called "leader of the free world" is supposed to represent. He claimed Europe "talks but doesn't produce", and suggested that Russia has "the upper hand" in Ukraine. Then he added the absurd notion that Ukraine should hold elections immediately, despite the obvious reality that democracies normally delay elections during full scale war. That sort of rhetoric undermines support for a sovereign nation fighting for survival, and broadcasts to the world that Trump is happy to toss aside democratic norms whenever it suits his personal or political convenience. As for his "A plus plus plus" fantasy about the US economy, it's not even worth unpacking. It's self promoting nonsense from someone who relies on ignorance to survive politically. If anything was a "masterclass", it was a lesson in telling MAGA exactly what they want to hear, no matter how detached from reality it is. On that narrow metric, sure, he excelled. But it was all bullshit, lies and fabrications. It still astounds me how completely MAGA have abandoned the idea of "facts over feelings". They cling to whatever lie makes them feel like they're winning, regardless of what is actually happening in the real world. When you face off against that, there's no changing minds, there's no spirited debate.  It's best to leave those lunatics alone in their echo chambers, which I suspect is why most have been smarter than me and just ignored this thread.

Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs?
Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists?
Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'?
If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown? 

Yadda’s posts are now marked as spam automatically by my program.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 1:25pm:

Yadda’s posts are now marked as spam automatically by my program.

Kanga,

Quote:

It's not that nobody read his posts, although I shouldn't pretend to speak for the entire audience.

I doubt many people read all of his posts.   :-[

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 12:34pm:

Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?

Your problem is that you see any sort of racial diversity as a negative purely based on what people look like.

The individual doesn't matter.

We'll never see eye to eye on this when you're simply being racist and just mocking everyone who calls you out.

You're not even trying to hide it with slipping "illegal" in anymore.

You've just listed a bunch of white countries and complained that their citizen are not allowed anymore and every one of their cities has to "look like" it's taken over by <Insert coloured races or people of differing faiths here>.

That's just straight up racism...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 3:06pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  Your problem is that you see any sort of racial diversity as a negative purely based on what people look like. The individual doesn't matter. We'll never see eye to eye on this when you're simply being racist and just mocking everyone who calls you out. You're not even trying to hide it with slipping "illegal" in anymore. You've just listed a bunch of white countries and complained that their citizen are not allowed anymore and every one of their cities has to "look like" it's taken over by <Insert coloured races or people of differing faiths here>. That's just straight up racism...

This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid.

You are now saying that people who prefer to be with their own kind who speak their language and follow and respect their own culturd and customs are racist and that they should all prefer to be with people who are culturally, linguistically, racially alien/different/ opposed to them. Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc wanting to remain Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc are wacist because of their preference for their own people and cultures  and they should all embrace every other culture EXCEPT their own, lest you call them wacists.

Meanwhile, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis going to those countries should RETAIN and celebrate their own cultures and customs in every country they go to, especially small European countries. Form ghettoes, retain their cultures, customs and languages and prefer their own kind because that is 'vibrant diversity'. That is not cultural colonisation, ONLY white people going to third world countries is colonisation.  Brown people preferring their own cultures everywhere they go = vibrant diversity. White people preferring thein own cultures in their own countries = straight up racism.

Twisted, sinister, Bbwiyasnesque stupidity is what you are spouting, ludicrous little innectual teapot. Dreadfully stupid. No wonder you are from Meanjin, ffs!  :D

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 3:34pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 3:06pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  Your problem is that you see any sort of racial diversity as a negative purely based on what people look like. The individual doesn't matter. We'll never see eye to eye on this when you're simply being racist and just mocking everyone who calls you out. You're not even trying to hide it with slipping "illegal" in anymore. You've just listed a bunch of white countries and complained that their citizen are not allowed anymore and every one of their cities has to "look like" it's taken over by <Insert coloured races or people of differing faiths here>. That's just straight up racism... This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid. You are now saying that people who prefer to be with their own kind who speak their language and follow and respect their own culturd and customs are racist and that they should all prefer to be with people who are culturally, linguistically, racially alien/different/ opposed to them. Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc wanting to remain Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc are wacist because of their preference for their own people and cultures  and they should all embrace every other culture EXCEPT their own, lest you call them wacists. Meanwhile, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis going to those countries should RETAIN and celebrate their own cultures and customs in every country they go to, especially small European countries. Form ghettoes, retain their cultures, customs and languages and prefer their own kind because that is 'vibrant diversity'. That is not cultural colonisation, ONLY white people going to third world countries is colonisation.  Brown people preferring their own cultures everywhere they go = vibrant diversity. White people preferring thein own cultures in their own countries = straight up racism. Twisted, sinister, Bbwiyasnesque stupidity is what you are spouting, ludicrous little innectual teapot. Dreadfully stupid. No wonder you are from Meanjin, ffs!  :D

Vibrant non-wacism:

A Somali non-profit leader was billing MaineCare while running to be the Warlord of Jubaland, Somalia.
https://x.com/TheMaineWire/status/1996198140924579854

Abdullahi Ali, founder and CEO of GCS, ran for president of Jubaland, a semi-autonomous region of Somalia, last year and publicly boasted at the time in Somali media of funding a militia there with proceeds “earned” in the United States. The Maine Wire’s reports on this scandal also fell on the willfully deaf ears of mainstream media outlets in Maine.

Ali founded Gateway together with its former executive director and current State Representative Deqa Dhalac (D-South Portland), who sits on the Maine Legislature’s Appropriations Committee. Prominent Democrats in the state have called Republican gubernatorial candidate Bobby Charles a racist for calling out Rep. Dhalac as potentially complicit in GCS’ mismanagement.

https://www.themainewire.com/2025/03/somali-american-received-millions-in-u-s-taxpayer-dollars-mainecare-funding-while-claiming-to-bankroll-jubaland-militia/

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 12:34pm:

Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?

frank,

Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with'
'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'.

That, when THEY totally ignore the fact that
ISLAM is, and enforces a MONO-culture, within every Sharia Law jurisdiction.

e.g.
Go and try and build a Christian CHURCH with in Turkey.

It is VERBOTTEN !!!


.


ALL CULTURES.
DO NOT PROMOTE THE VERY SAME 'VIRTUES'. !!!

-------- >

"...the Prophet said,
'If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion,
kill him."
- DEAD.
hadithsunnah/bukhari/ #004.052.260


.


And, here again......
the 'modality' of ISLAM is revealed......


ISLAMIC law,
ISLAMIC law,
ISLAMIC law,
makes it lawful for the devout follower of ISLAM,
to kill those persons who reject [i.e. who 'insult'] ISLAM
......even if that devout follower of ISLAM is a person who living, in Australia.


-------- >

ISLAMIC LAW....
"Ibn 'Umar related that the Messenger of Allah, upon whom be peace, said, "I have been ordered to kill the people until they testify that there is no god except Allah, and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and they establish prayer and pay the zakah. If they do that, their blood and wealth are protected from me save by the rights of Islam. Their reckoning will be with Allah." (Related by al-Bukhari and Muslim.) "
fiqhussunnah/fus1_06


ISLAMIC LAW....
"Ibn 'Abbas reported that the Prophet said: "The bare essence of Islam and the basics of the religion are three [acts], upon which Islam has been established. Whoever leaves one of them becomes an unbeliever and his blood may legally be spilled. [The acts are:] Testifying that there is no God except Allah, the obligatory prayers, and the fast of Ramadan."...."
fiqhussunnah/#3.110

n.b.
"Whoever......becomes an unbeliever.....
his blood may legally be spilled."

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 3:34pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 3:06pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  Your problem is that you see any sort of racial diversity as a negative purely based on what people look like. The individual doesn't matter. We'll never see eye to eye on this when you're simply being racist and just mocking everyone who calls you out. You're not even trying to hide it with slipping "illegal" in anymore. You've just listed a bunch of white countries and complained that their citizen are not allowed anymore and every one of their cities has to "look like" it's taken over by <Insert coloured races or people of differing faiths here>. That's just straight up racism... This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid. You are now saying that people who prefer to be with their own kind who speak their language and follow and respect their own culturd and customs are racist and that they should all prefer to be with people who are culturally, linguistically, racially alien/different/ opposed to them. Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc wanting to remain Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc are wacist because of their preference for their own people and cultures  and they should all embrace every other culture EXCEPT their own, lest you call them wacists. Meanwhile, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis going to those countries should RETAIN and celebrate their own cultures and customs in every country they go to, especially small European countries. Form ghettoes, retain their cultures, customs and languages and prefer their own kind because that is 'vibrant diversity'. That is not cultural colonisation, ONLY white people going to third world countries is colonisation.  Brown people preferring their own cultures everywhere they go = vibrant diversity. White people preferring thein own cultures in their own countries = straight up racism. Twisted, sinister, Bbwiyasnesque stupidity is what you are spouting, ludicrous little innectual teapot. Dreadfully stupid. No wonder you are from Meanjin, ffs!  :D

You just made a big deal about seeing non white people there, and now you want to walk it back?

This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid.

Quote:

Donald Trump on The Conversation

Conversation ? Why would Trump be on something that he can't do.

aquascoot wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 12:24pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:08pm: A masterclass on being completely inept, talking in cliches, having no idea what's going on in the world, not even what his own staff are doing. His answer to the Ukraine war? Never would have happened if he was prez. The reason for that? The 2020 election was stolen from him - the same old lines he's been repeating for four years. He's a negotiator, it's just what he does. Vlad respects him. Vlad, the guy who read the Kremlin report in 2016 that Trump was so mentally unstable, he was the perfect choice for prez. Today, Vlad has a puppet in the White House who shares his view of Europe as the common enemy, and yes, it's starting to look like he'll pull the US out of NATO altogether. A demented rant from an inept puppet. The only hope for the pax Americana is the 2026 mid-terms. STOP THE STEAL !!! Stop the steal? Yes, pulling the US out of NATO will stop the Europeans stealing from the American taxpayer

Didn't watch it, did you, dear?

After all that schmaltz about studying him, you avoid every opportunity you get.

Like the Muselman, you won't allow any image of the prophet.

Haram, innit. Kill all those who insult him, no?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 6:42pm:

Quote: Donald Trump on The Conversation Conversation ? Why would Trump be on something that he can't do.

No no, it's a monologue with a few embarrassed questions thrown in.

Check out the interviewer. No matter how much she's been prepped, she's still stunned at how inept his answers are.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 5:28pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 3:34pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 3:06pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Whg must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  Your problem is that you see any sort of racial diversity as a negative purely based on what people look like. The individual doesn't matter. We'll never see eye to eye on this when you're simply being racist and just mocking everyone who calls you out. You're not even trying to hide it with slipping "illegal" in anymore. You've just listed a bunch of white countries and complained that their citizen are not allowed anymore and every one of their cities has to "look like" it's taken over by <Insert coloured races or people of differing faiths here>. That's just straight up racism... This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid. You are now saying that people who prefer to be with their own kind who speak their language and follow and respect their own culturd and customs are racist and that they should all prefer to be with people who are culturally, linguistically, racially alien/different/ opposed to them. Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc wanting to remain Scotts, Danes, Czechs etc are wacist because of their preference for their own people and cultures  and they should all embrace every other culture EXCEPT their own, lest you call them wacists. Meanwhile, Somalis, Afghans, Pakistanis going to those countries should RETAIN and celebrate their own cultures and customs in every country they go to, especially small European countries. Form ghettoes, retain their cultures, customs and languages and prefer their own kind because that is 'vibrant diversity'. That is not cultural colonisation, ONLY white people going to third world countries is colonisation.  Brown people preferring their own cultures everywhere they go = vibrant diversity. White people preferring thein own cultures in their own countries = straight up racism. Twisted, sinister, Bbwiyasnesque stupidity is what you are spouting, ludicrous little innectual teapot. Dreadfully stupid. No wonder you are from Meanjin, ffs!  :D You just made a big deal about seeing non white people there, and now you want to walk it back? This is idiotic, as was to be expected from you. Twisted, stupid.

It's not about their colour, ya laughable, comical innelectual.
It is about their culture, customs, values.

Western civilisation is universalist. You can join it enjoy it, share its fruits, contribute to it. It doesn't form ghettos like the Chinese, Indians, Pakis, Somalis and the rest of the tinted bozos who always carry on about wacism even as they are flocking to western countries. You'd think they'd keep away if the west was really that wacist. They are all lying, as are you.

'"white ghetto" isn't a formal designation but describes areas where impoverished white South Africans live, often post-apartheid, facing economic hardship, limited opportunities, and feelings of being left behind'.

Yadda wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 5:26pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  frank, Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with' 'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'.

Thanks.

The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points.

If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged.

You can't reason with hysterics.

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 7:16pm:

Yadda wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:26pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  frank, Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with' 'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'. Thanks. The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points. If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged. You can't reason with hysterics.

I'm sure Y appreciates your vitriol.

Thanks, Frank.

Karnal wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:05pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 7:16pm: Yadda wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:26pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  frank, Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with' 'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'. Thanks. The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points. If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged. You can't reason with hysterics. I'm sure Y appreciates your vitriol. Thanks, Frank.

When will you ever say something that is reasonable, rather than just moronic paki grimacing?

Not in your repertoire. Ten rupee paki grimacing and tap-dancing it is to the bitter end.

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:10pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:05pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 7:16pm: Yadda wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:26pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  frank, Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with' 'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'. Thanks. The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points. If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged. You can't reason with hysterics. I'm sure Y appreciates your vitriol. Thanks, Frank. When will you ever say something that is reasonable, rather than just moronic paki grimacing? Not in your repertoire. Ten rupee paki grimacing and tap-dancing it is to the bitter end.

Good point, dear boy, we stand corrected.

The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points.

If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged.

You can't reason with hysterics. I am ALL for killing them.

How do we know?

You said.

Karnal wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:18pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:10pm: Karnal wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:05pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 7:16pm: Yadda wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:26pm: Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 12:34pm: Why is it 'ultranationalist' if distinct countries with their own history, culture, languages want to maintain themselves rather than be a mix of every kind of alien, different cultures, languages, customs? Why is it that Danes, Swedes, the Dutch, Hungarians, Czechs, Irish etc cannot be Danes, Swedes, Dutch etc in their own countries but must live with Somalis, Syrians, Chinese, Indians, Sudanese etc lest they be labelled 'ultranationalist' or illiberal of wacists? Why is it OK to resist cultural Americanisation but not cultural muslimification? Why must British cultural inheritance be repudiated but Muslim or Indian cultural influence welcomed as vibrant multiculturalism? Why must every European  country be multicultural but every third world country resist western 'cultural imperialism'? If you can't be a Scott in Scotland because you are 'too white', as the paki Humza Yusef put it, where CAN you be a Scott??? Why must every European city look like it's in some Sudanese/Pakistani/Arab Chinatown?  frank, Worthy and intelligent counter-points, against those, here on OzPol, 'running with' 'We must promote the 'virtue' of multiculturalism'. Thanks. The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points. If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged. You can't reason with hysterics. I'm sure Y appreciates your vitriol. Thanks, Frank. When will you ever say something that is reasonable, rather than just moronic paki grimacing? Not in your repertoire. Ten rupee paki grimacing and tap-dancing it is to the bitter end. Good point, dear boy, we stand corrected. The multuculti morons will NEVER address such points. If they could, if they had reason on their side, they could easily state them. But since they have no reason, only emotion, they never say anything intelligent, only things that are emotionally charged. You can't reason with hysterics. I am ALL for killing them. How do we know? You said.

Mothra,  gweggy wanker creep, thicko smiff and bbwiyawn  think you are a genius, paki.
If that doesn't give you pause to rethink your position, nothing will

And Frank continues to defend alleged child rapists and convicted felons.

Hmm, I wonder why   :-/

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:31pm:

And Frank continues to defend alleged child rapists and convicted felons. Hmm, I wonder why   :-/

Where, wanker creep?
Or is it creepy wanker? Wanking creep? Creep that wanketh? Despicable lying onanist?   

Frank wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 9:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:31pm: And Frank continues to defend alleged child rapists and convicted felons. Hmm, I wonder why   :-/ Where, ...?

Here, there, and everywhere.

Why do you like kiddie fiddlers, rapists, and fraudsters so much?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 9:10pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 9:05pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:31pm: And Frank continues to defend alleged child rapists and convicted felons. Hmm, I wonder why   :-/ Where, ...?   Here, there, and everywhere. Why do you like kiddie fiddlers, rapists, and fraudsters so much? I'm curious.

There, paki and teapot,  is your audience.

greggerypeccary wrote on Dec 11^th, 2025 at 8:31pm:

And Frank continues to defend alleged child rapists and convicted felons. Hmm, I wonder why   :-/

An enigmatic conundrum, Greggery. These are the questions of our age, no?

Do you think it has anything to do with the tinted races?