Pauline Hanson has worn a black Burqa into the Senate chamber, after a she was denied leave by the government to table a bill to have burqas and full-face coverings banned in Australia,

https://i.ibb.co/2YW89rB0/Screenshot-20251124-162206.png

This is the second time in her career where she has worn the Burqa in parliament.

This time around there was uproar with people like Penny Wong condemning her.

But why was she condemned? Penny Wong only moments beforehand voted against introducing the bill banning such outfits. That vote indicates she has no issue with people wearing it.

MattE wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 3:30pm:

Pauline Hanson has worn a black Burqa into the Senate chamber, after a she was denied leave by the government to table a bill to have burqas and full-face coverings banned in Australia, https://i.ibb.co/2YW89rB0/Screenshot-20251124-162206.png This is the second time in her career where she has worn the Burqa in parliament. This time around there was uproar with people like Penny Wong condemning her. But why was she condemned? Penny Wong only moments beforehand voted against introducing the bill banning such outfits. That vote indicates she has no issue with people wearing it.

Good one!


Obviously NOT "a woman's choice what she wears".

There was no debate or vote on banning the Burqa, but it looks like the Senate will sanction Pauline Hanson for wearing it.

If they are so offended by the Burqa, perhaps they should ban it!

MattE wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 3:57pm:

There was no debate or vote on banning the Burqa, but it looks like the Senate will sanction Pauline Hanson for wearing it. If they are so offended by the Burqa, perhaps they should ban it!

They will endorse the burqa - but 'ban' Hanson for wearing one.

I wonder what reason they will give for sanctioning her?

Pauline snookered Labor and Greens.
It will be interesting to see media reaction.

It doesn't matter if she was in the right.
What matters is that Leftism has the power to do what 'they' like.
Only power is right now.

MattE wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 3:30pm:

Pauline Hanson has worn a black Burqa into the Senate chamber, after a she was denied leave by the government to table a bill to have burqas and full-face coverings banned in Australia, https://i.ibb.co/2YW89rB0/Screenshot-20251124-162206.png This is the second time in her career where she has worn the Burqa in parliament. This time around there was uproar with people like Penny Wong condemning her. But why was she condemned? Penny Wong only moments beforehand voted against introducing the bill banning such outfits. That vote indicates she has no issue with people wearing it.

Members of the Greens and the crossbench were furious, with independent senator Lidia Thorpe heard telling the chamber “someone should rip her head off”.

“This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racist and Islamophobia … and someone should pull her up on that,” Mehreen Faruqi said.

Fatima Payman said: “She is disrespecting a faith, she is disrespecting the Muslims out there, Muslim Australians. It is absolutely unconstitutional. This needs to be dealt with before we proceed.”




So wearing a burqa is disrespectful, unconstitutional, wacist, islamophobic!!! And do it must not be banned!!


The islamo- lefty discombobulaled mind virus on display.


It's the woman's choice - just not this woman's.



[Thunder and lightning. Enter three Witches]
First Witch      When shall we three meet again
In thunder, lightning, or in rain?
Second Witch      When the hurlyburly's done,
When the battle's lost and won.
Third Witch      That will be ere the set of sun.      
First Witch      Where the place?
Second Witch      Upon the heath.
Third Witch      There to meet with Hanson.
First Witch      I come, graymalkin!
Second Witch      Paddock calls.      
Third Witch      Anon!
ALL      Fair is foul, and foul is fair:
Hover through the fog and filthy air.

No disrespect to ban or burn the Australian Flag then?

Go Pauline!!

Make passionate sexual encounter with the Muslims... they don't rule here.

---

Quote:

Why did Muslim-majority Tajikistan ban the hijab? 24/06/2024 The ban on headscarves in Tajikistan is seen as a reflection of the political line that the government of president-for-life Emomali Rahmon has been pursuing since 1997. Tajikistan's government passed a law banning the hijab, the latest in a string of 35 wide-ranging religion-related acts, in a move described by the government as "protecting national cultural values" and "preventing superstition and extremism". The law, approved by parliament's upper house Majlisi Milli last Thursday, bans the use of "foreign clothing" — including the hijab, or head covering worn by Muslim women. Instead, Tajikistan citizens are encouraged to wear Tajik national dress. Those violating the law are set to be fined on a scale ranging from 7,920 Tajikistani somoni (almost €700) for ordinary citizens, 54,000 somoni (€4,694) for government officials and 57,600 somoni (about €5,000) if they are a religious figure. Similar laws passed earlier this month affect several religious practices, such as the centuries-old tradition known in Tajikistan as "iydgardak," in which children go door-to-door to collect pocket money on Eid holidays. The decision was seen as surprising, as the central Asian country of some 10 million is 96% Muslim, according to the last census in 2020. Turning mosques into tea houses In Tajikistan, the government of president-for-life Emomali Rahmon has had its sights set on what they describe as extremism for a long time. After a peace deal to end a five-year civil war in 1997, Rahmon — who has been in power since 1994 — first found a way to coexist with the opposition Tajikistan Islamic Resurrection Party (TIRP), which was granted a series of concessions. After first banning the hijab in public institutions, including universities and government buildings, in 2009, the regime in Dushanbe pushed for a number of formal and informal rules meant to prevent neighbouring countries from exerting influence but also strengthen its control over the country. While there are no legal restrictions on beards in Tajikistan, multiple reports state that law enforcement has forcibly shaved men sporting bushy beards, seen as a potential sign of someone's extremist religious views. The Law on Parental Responsibility, which entered into force in 2011, penalises parents who send their children to religious education abroad, while according to the same law, those under 18 are banned from entering places of worship without permission. A 2017 statement by the Tajikistan Religious Affairs Committee said that 1,938 mosques were closed down in just one year, and places of worship were converted into tea shops and medical centres, for example. In 2004, France introduced legislation prohibiting wearing "symbols or clothes through which students conspicuously display their religious affiliation," including the hijab, in public primary schools, middle schools, and secondary schools, but not its universities. Italy has banned the hijab-like swimsuit, also known as the "burkini", from its pools and beaches since 2009. In addition, Germany, Belgium, Norway and Bulgaria all have laws prohibiting the use of face-covering garments, known as burqas, in schools or public institutions. Several Muslim-majority countries have banned the burqa and hijab in public schools, universities, or government buildings, including Tunisia (since 1981, partially lifted in 2011), Kosovo (since 2009), Azerbaijan (since 2010), Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. https://www.euronews.com/2024/06/24/why-did-muslim-majority-tajikistan-ban-the-hijab

A muslim majority country bans Hijab to prevent superstition and extremism.

Last census showed nearly 40% of Australians have no religion and Pauline is the only one sticking up for us against these superstitions that lead to extremism. ::)

We can't even talk about this the bedwetters in Parliament try to appease Islamic extremists.

https://i.ibb.co/j9HgfMJF/Screenshot-20251124-184255.png

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D

Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man".

3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs:

https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/

"Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007.

"He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers."

Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 5:51pm:

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man". 3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs: https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/ "Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007. "He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers." Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

i
She should worn a burqa. It's a magic protector.

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 6:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 5:51pm: Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man". 3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs: https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/ "Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007. "He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers." Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.” i She should worn a burqa. It's a magic protector.

Sheik Hilaly did say after the Sydney gang rapes if these women were at home wearing their hijabs they wouldn't have been raped.

The usual suspects, defending rapists.

https://i.ibb.co/pvgXwGmY/Screenshot-20251124-195624-2.jpg

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 5:02pm:

Members of the Greens and the crossbench were furious, with independent senator Lidia Thorpe heard telling the chamber “someone should rip her head off”. “This is a racist senator, displaying blatant racist and Islamophobia … and someone should pull her up on that,” Mehreen Faruqi said. Fatima Payman said: “She is disrespecting a faith, she is disrespecting the Muslims out there, Muslim Australians. It is absolutely unconstitutional. This needs to be dealt with before we proceed.” So wearing a burqa is disrespectful, unconstitutional, wacist, islamophobic!!! And do it must not be banned!! The islamo- lefty discombobulaled mind virus on display. It's the woman's choice - just not this woman's.

It looks like the only place a Burqa is banned in Australia is in Parliament if Pauline wears it.


Faruqi Payman and Thorpe agree with banning the Burqa now they have to not limit it to Pauline.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 6:08pm:

The usual suspects, defending rapists.

You're accusing the wrong ones. But hey, you are a Lefty.

Pauline should be thrown out of parliament

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:04pm:

Pauline should be thrown out of parliament

And take the Lefties with her.
Two wrongs not making a right.

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:04pm:

Pauline should be thrown out of parliament

Why?

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:09pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why?

she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it

Well done Pauline.
Keep up the good work

Hanson and the Left feed off each other.
Both turn Parliament into a dump.
It's like watching Aussie & Lisa v Monk & Mothra.

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:11pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it

Not a woman's choice then.
It's for thick morons like you to dictate the wearing of it.
You sound like a bearded jihadi moron. Are you?

I think you are, like karnal is a Paki.

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:11pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it

That is a thought crime, you are now calling for people to be banned for thoughts. So very left for you.

Go Pauline.   ;D

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/women-have-choice-anne-aly-says-pauline-hansons-burqa-stunt-unacceptable/4uxl3ozms



https://images.sbs.com.au/e2/62/0f25d76a4ae8a67cba54a4672495/20251124170492024029-original.jpg

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15320079/pauline-hanson-burqa-senate-parliament.html


https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2025/11/24/05/104133323-15320079-image-a-1_1763963522017.jpg

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D

Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man".

3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs:

https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/

"Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007.

"He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers."

Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 8:09pm:

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man". 3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs: https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/ "Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007. "He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers." Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

But when you're a star they let you do it.

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:24pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it Not a woman's choice then. It's for thick morons like you to dictate the wearing of it. You sound like a bearded jihadi moron. Are you? I think you are, like karnal is a Paki.

who said she can't wear it? :D

Leroy wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:41pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it That is a thought crime, you are now calling for people to be banned for thoughts. So very left for you.

stay stupid

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:24pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it Not a woman's choice then. It's for thick morons like you to dictate the wearing of it. You sound like a bearded jihadi moron. Are you? I think you are, like karnal is a Paki. who said she can't wear it? :D

Thank you, moron.

What's the brouhaha about when, thicko amigo?

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D

Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man".

3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs:

https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/

"Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007.

"He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers."

Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 9:13pm:

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man". 3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs: https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/ "Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007. "He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers." Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

Thank you, Bbwiyawn.
Next, 76 twilight zones and 546 yawns.

,

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 9:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 9:13pm: Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man". 3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs: https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/ "Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007. "He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers." Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.” Thank you, Bbwiyawn. Next, 76 twilight zones and 546 yawns. ,

Why do you defend rapists?

Why do you fabricated rapists with lies?
Remember, Smith is your mate ;D

John Smith wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 7:11pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it

Props are OK when Lidia Fatima and Mehreen wear a Keffiyeh a bit of a double standard here.

Federal politics live: Pauline Hanson slammed for 'headline-grabbing' burka stunt :o

Hanson complaining about the "ill treatment of women"?   ;D

Pauline Hanson says convicted rapist is "a good man".

3 mins to 3 mins 8 secs:

https://www.4bc.com.au/podcast/no-way-pauline-hanson-shuts-down-rumours-of-a-preference-deal-with-clive-palmer/

"Black raped the woman after she told him to stop physically abusing her in October 2007.

"He also pushed her down the stairs and kicked her. In another incident, he slammed a door on her fingers."

Hanson: “I stand by this man and he won’t be getting sacked.”

Just to show how the Media Leftism has degraded Australian politics.
Both Hanson & Thorpe are prime examples of 'shock jocking' for publicity. They are basically just trolls like Gwoggy.

...every day, Gwoggy stands up in parliament to cry "Rape".

Jasin wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 9:30am:

Just to show how the Media Leftism has degraded Australian politics. Both Hanson & Thorpe are prime examples of 'shock jocking' for publicity.

You're right for once.

Hanson is just an attention whore.

She always has been. She's abhorrent. You need good verbal communication skills for Politics and she talks like she has dysentery.
From day one, it was never about entering politics with her. It was about entering the Media.
Take into account that Australian politics is the reverse of USA - where independent States unify 'up' into One nation. We have always started as one nation (via British sponsorship) and our progression is down into many individuals States, down to Shires, etc.
Hanson's stupid One Nation is both backwards and selling snow to a snowman. She is a complete twit and parasite like Thorpe.

Trade between the States here, when each State had something different (and culturally) to offer, created a more vibrant domestic economy.

Jasin wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 9:45am:

She always has been. She's abhorrent. You need good verbal communication skills for Politics and she talks like she has dysentery. From day one, it was never about entering politics with her. It was about entering the Media. Take into account that Australian politics is the reverse of USA - where independent States unify 'up' into One nation. We have always started as one nation (via British sponsorship) and our progression is down into many individuals States, down to Shires, etc. Hanson's stupid One Nation is both backwards and selling snow to a snowman. She is a complete twit and parasite like Thorpe.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExcWs0cWV5dzFjdjU1ZGdwMmtwZGs5YmpyYXZ0OGZ0cHp6ZzVnNjkycCZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/XyDByNPzosrQNRaVMP/giphy.gif

If Fatty Payman can wear a foreign clown garb in parliament, why can't anyone? Lividia or Ken Wyatt could wear animal furs in parliament to great applause. Maori buffoons can have face tattoos in parliament and perform their ridiculous haka.


Suspending Hanson means that Parliament effectively banned the burqa IN parliament but refuses to consider banning it anywhere else.  Hanson is right  to call them total hypocrites.

All she wanted to table a bill for debate so the burqa can be debated in parliament. They refused to debate it  and simpy banned the wearing of it IN parliament.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 10:25am:

If Fatty Payman can wear a foreign clown garb in parliament, why can't anyone? Lividia or Ken Wyatt could wear animal furs in parliament to great applause. Maori buffoons can have face tattoos in parliament and perform their ridiculous haka. Suspending Hanson means that Parliament effectively banned the burqa IN parliament but refuses to consider banning it anywhere else.  Hanson is right  to call them total hypocrites. All she wanted to table a bill for debate so the burqa can be debated in parliament. They refused to debate it  and simpy banned the wearing of it IN parliament.

It's the prop that was banned from parliament, and in this case it just so happened to be a burqa.

Hanson isn't a Muslim and she doesn't wear a burqa in everyday life.

Thus, her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament.

The same thing would happen if she wore traditional Aboriginal animal furs, a kippah, or a turban.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:03am:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 10:25am: If Fatty Payman can wear a foreign clown garb in parliament, why can't anyone? Lividia or Ken Wyatt could wear animal furs in parliament to great applause. Maori buffoons can have face tattoos in parliament and perform their ridiculous haka. Suspending Hanson means that Parliament effectively banned the burqa IN parliament but refuses to consider banning it anywhere else.  Hanson is right  to call them total hypocrites. All she wanted to table a bill for debate so the burqa can be debated in parliament. They refused to debate it  and simpy banned the wearing of it IN parliament. It's the prop that was banned from parliament, and in this case it just so happened to be a burqa. Hanson isn't a Muslim and she doesn't wear a burqa in everyday life. Thus, her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament. The same thing would happen if she wore traditional Aboriginal animal furs, a kippah, or a turban.

1.  So the burqa is a racist, misogynist, disrespectful prop and it is NOT the woman's choice to wear it if she  wants to.




2.  Hanson also managed to send a message directly to the 15 per cent of voters opinion polls show support her Reform-like One Nation party, more than double the vote share it achieved in Australia’s general election last May. The centre-right Liberal and National coalition parties are in electoral freefall, not least because they are seen as weak and divided on mass immigration, and multiculturalism versus assimilation. Hanson sees the burka ban as an opportunity to appeal to these disenchanted supporters.

What Hanson didn’t get was a fair hearing as an elected senator which, like it or not, she is. She has a right to propose legislation and to seek its parliamentary debate. Hanson was denied the chance to speak by the president of the Senate, shouted down by other senators, and generally ridiculed by the Australian media.


https://www.spectator.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/3D762D2.jpg

The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:09am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:03am: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 10:25am: If Fatty Payman can wear a foreign clown garb in parliament, why can't anyone? Lividia or Ken Wyatt could wear animal furs in parliament to great applause. Maori buffoons can have face tattoos in parliament and perform their ridiculous haka. Suspending Hanson means that Parliament effectively banned the burqa IN parliament but refuses to consider banning it anywhere else.  Hanson is right  to call them total hypocrites. All she wanted to table a bill for debate so the burqa can be debated in parliament. They refused to debate it  and simpy banned the wearing of it IN parliament. It's the prop that was banned from parliament, and in this case it just so happened to be a burqa. Hanson isn't a Muslim and she doesn't wear a burqa in everyday life. Thus, her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament. The same thing would happen if she wore traditional Aboriginal animal furs, a kippah, or a turban. 1.  So the burqa is a racist, misogynist, disrespectful prop and it is NOT the woman's choice to wear it if she  wants to.

English, MOFO - do you speak it?

Hanson isn't a Muslim and she doesn't wear a burqa in everyday life.

Thus, her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament.

The same thing would happen if she wore traditional Aboriginal animal furs, a kippah, or a turban.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:09am:

The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament.

Again, it's not about the burqa, it's about it being used as a prop in a stunt.

Moreover, the ridiculousness of a piece of clothing is entirely subjective.

https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/130319113420-pope-wardrobe-pallium.jpg

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:28am:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:09am: The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament. Again, it's not about the burqa, it's about it being used as a prop in a stunt. Moreover, the ridiculousness of a piece of clothing is entirely subjective. https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/130319113420-pope-wardrobe-pallium.jpg

The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament.  It is a ridiculous and offensive garb EVERYWERE.

Albo isn't a Sikh.
https://clubrunner.blob.core.windows.net/00000014574/Images/image_20240408-065108.png

There was sever butthurt in the Parliament yesterday, islamo commies showed their true dictatorial colours and stupidity.
More votes for One Nation, good on Pauline.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:29am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:28am: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:09am: The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament. Again, it's not about the burqa, it's about it being used as a prop in a stunt. Moreover, the ridiculousness of a piece of clothing is entirely subjective. https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/130319113420-pope-wardrobe-pallium.jpg The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament.  It is a ridiculous and offensive garb EVERYWERE. Albo isn't a Sikh.

PM Albanese isn't performing a stunt in parliament in that photo.

"her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament."

Quote:

Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa

By far her most attractive look.

Is this a replay of what she did years ago or didn't she learn her lesson the first time and just enjoys looking stupid ?

Dnarever wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:59am:

Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa By far her most attractive look. Is this a replay of what she did years ago or didn't she learn her lesson the first time and just enjoys looking stupid ?

Didn't learn her lesson   :-/

kU6mdn74 wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:35am:

There was sever butthurt in the Parliament yesterday, islamo commies showed their true dictatorial colours and stupidity. More votes for One Nation, good on Pauline.

Yep I'm gunna vote #1  Pauline Hanson's party.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 12:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:59am: Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa By far her most attractive look. Is this a replay of what she did years ago or didn't she learn her lesson the first time and just enjoys looking stupid ? Didn't learn her lesson   :-/

The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 6:08pm:

The usual suspects, defending rapists.

You seen to have an extraordinary fondness or obsession with rapists.

They're always on your mind. ::)

Frank wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 9:11pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 8:25pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:24pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it Not a woman's choice then. It's for thick morons like you to dictate the wearing of it. You sound like a bearded jihadi moron. Are you? I think you are, like karnal is a Paki. who said she can't wear it? :D Thank you, moron. What's the brouhaha about when, thicko amigo?

the brouhaha is about the same thing that got you all excited about it

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24^th, 2025 at 11:03pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it Props are OK when Lidia Fatima and Mehreen wear a Keffiyeh a bit of a double standard here.

Only if they are wearing as a prop to offend others

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:03am:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 10:25am: If Fatty Payman can wear a foreign clown garb in parliament, why can't anyone? Lividia or Ken Wyatt could wear animal furs in parliament to great applause. Maori buffoons can have face tattoos in parliament and perform their ridiculous haka. Suspending Hanson means that Parliament effectively banned the burqa IN parliament but refuses to consider banning it anywhere else.  Hanson is right  to call them total hypocrites. All she wanted to table a bill for debate so the burqa can be debated in parliament. They refused to debate it  and simpy banned the wearing of it IN parliament. It's the prop that was banned from parliament, and in this case it just so happened to be a burqa. Hanson isn't a Muslim and she doesn't wear a burqa in everyday life. Thus, her actions were just a stunt and the burqa was used as a prop - that's not allowed in parliament. The same thing would happen if she wore traditional Aboriginal animal furs, a kippah, or a turban.

Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time.

Lefty hypocrisy.

The Burka has no place in our society.

It is not a religious garment. It's an oppressive patriarchal tool demanded by men who do not trust themselves ......

why? they can't trust themselves or their fellow Muslim men not to rape women.

They should be your favourites.

---

Jewish Albo

---

Kumul Albo

---

Indonesian Albo

---

Wrong Shirt Albo having a sulk.  ;D

---

Green moron Faruqi wearing a keffiyeh in our Parliament.

---

Victorian Green moron wearing keffiyeh in Parliament

---

wrote on :
A prop.

As is the burqa wherever it is worn. Hijab, ditto.  They are props in every instance.

That is why they are banned in countries that have banned them.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 11:29am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:28am: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:09am: The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament. Again, it's not about the burqa, it's about it being used as a prop in a stunt. Moreover, the ridiculousness of a piece of clothing is entirely subjective. https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/130319113420-pope-wardrobe-pallium.jpg The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament.  It is a ridiculous and offensive garb EVERYWERE. Albo isn't a Sikh. https://clubrunner.blob.core.windows.net/00000014574/Images/image_20240408-065108.png

was that in parliament ya dumbarse?

Gnads wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 1:43pm:

Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy.

you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament.

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 1:58pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:43pm: Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy. you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament.

She made a good point -
she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it
but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion.
Is this a democracy or what?

It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.   ::)

Update - she has been banned for a whole week.  ::)

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 1:58pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:43pm: Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy. you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament.

Coming from a bigger idiot - you. Wearing a keffiyeh in parliament is wearing a terrorist supporting nationalist piece of clothing.

Albanese wearing an ultra rightwing Hindu Nationalist Organisations scarf has nothing to do with respect when he wears it in Australia.

You lefty moron hypocrite.

---

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:43pm: Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy. you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament. She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.   ::)

Why is it ok to wear the burqa anywhere but in Parliament?
Why is it offensive in parliament but not anywhere else in public?

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 2:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:43pm: Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy. you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament. She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.   ::) Why is it ok to wear the burqa anywhere but in Parliament? Why is it offensive in parliament but not anywhere else in public?

The dictatorship got her on a technicality by calling it a prop.   ::)

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 11:03pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:11pm: Frank wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:09pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 24th, 2025 at 7:04pm: Pauline should be thrown out of parliament Why? she's not wearing it because she wants to wear a burqa, she's wearing it as a prop. It's not her first time either. She should be thrown out for it Props are OK when Lidia Fatima and Mehreen wear a Keffiyeh a bit of a double standard here. Only if they are wearing as a prop to offend others

The burqa is worn as a prop to offend others everywhere in Australia.
In Australia it has absolutely no other function but to offend.


"I'm the muslim, I make the rules, infidel dawgs. Even in your country."

https://64.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mbq2dnHwtu1qaxgbho1_500.jpg

Ishwamic Fweedom

---

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 2:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 1:43pm: Yet we see our Prime Minister wearing culturally appropriated clothing all the time. Lefty hypocrisy. you're an idiot. There is a huge difference between wearing something as a mark of respect when you are attending their function, and wearing it to garner a reaction in parliament. She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.   ::) Why is it ok to wear the burqa anywhere but in Parliament? Why is it offensive in parliament but not anywhere else in public?

Again, it's not about the burqa, it's about it being used as a prop in a stunt.

PETA should be onto Lydia's animal fur fashion

Only Pauline has the guts to say anything about political correctness.


This TV show would not be allowed now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHoA0yA97Bw

Seven day suspension from the Senate   ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 3:03pm:

Seven day suspension from the Senate   ;D

yep - that's what dictatorships do to silence free speech.

Welcome to our one party, 2 branches, communist State.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 3:03pm:

Seven day suspension from the Senate   ;D

And she's banned from representing Australia overseas   ;D

Suck schitt to her.
The other dogs reacting to her crying racist should also be suspended because they also bring Parliament down with Hanson.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 2:05pm:

She made a good point -

no she didn't

Gnads wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 2:06pm:

Wearing a keffiyeh in parliament is wearing a terrorist supporting nationalist piece of clothing.

;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


how stupid does have to be to claim that clothing supports terrorism?

;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D

have a bex and a lay down, you're out of your depth

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 4:28pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:06pm: Wearing a keffiyeh in parliament is wearing a terrorist supporting nationalist piece of clothing. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D how stupid does have to be to claim that clothing supports terrorism? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D have a bex and a lay down, you're out of your depth

wrote on :
Wearing a keffiya now is a prop to signal support for Islamic fasists in Gaza.  Nothing else.

It is not about the keffiya it is about support for jihadis.




If Hanson went into the senate in a suit and tie nobody would bat an eyelid.

If she went in with a t shirt saying treaty now, or say yes to the voice or Net Zero Now or END Coal Now - clapping, nodding.

But demonstrating just how disrespectful, divisive, and degrading the  over the top (!) Islamic garb as a political statement is -  she gets banned!!! :D :D :D



The bints and bastards in the Senate are running from even discussing the meaning of the burqa in a secular society - so they ban Hanson for wearing it, supposedly in support and respect for bints who wear it OUTSIDE parliament.

Led by Penny Wrong, Faruqi and Lividia.

Islam is the new trans.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 5:20pm:

The bints and bastards in the Senate are running from even discussing the meaning of the burqa in a secular society - so they ban Hanson for wearing it, supposedly in support and respect for bints who wear it OUTSIDE parliament.

It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about the prop and the cunning stunt.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 5:23pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 5:20pm: The bints and bastards in the Senate are running from even discussing the meaning of the burqa in a secular society - so they ban Hanson for wearing it, supposedly in support and respect for bints who wear it OUTSIDE parliament. It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about the prop and the cunning stunt.

Parliament IS for political statements. Hanson made a political statement about the abject hypocrisy of the political class, examplified by Pussy Wrong, Faruqi and Lividia: they banned the burqa in support of it, FFS!! They are as stupid, moronic, snivellingly self-contradictory as you, creepy wanker.

As it has been pointed out, bints have been wearing keffiyas, possum skins, kangaroo skins, etc

Parliament IS for politics and the burqa is a political statement in Australia. There is absolutely no reason to wear it anywhere in Australia except to make a political statement. If you think the people of Australia are just like the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan and so you have to wear a burqa to protect yourself from them -  they what the bloody hell are you doing here???  **** right off back to Pakistan and Shitholeistan.


The burqa is a political statement evewywhere, in and out parliament. Which is is why it it is banned in quite a few countries.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 5:34pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 5:23pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 5:20pm: The bints and bastards in the Senate are running from even discussing the meaning of the burqa in a secular society - so they ban Hanson for wearing it, supposedly in support and respect for bints who wear it OUTSIDE parliament. It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about the prop and the cunning stunt. Parliament IS for political statements.

It's not the place for props and stunts though.

As such, she'll be suspended for seven sitting days and banned from ever representing Australia overseas.

I love days like these  :)

Hanson has the usual suspects in a tizz because they cannot refute the point she has made.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 5:20pm:

Wearing a keffiya now is a prop to signal support for Islamic fasists in Gaza.  Nothing else.

crap..... they wear them all the time when out in public.  Crying everything is a prop only further highlights what a waste your education was and why you should seek that refund.

Belgarion wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 6:09pm:

Hanson has the usual suspects in a tizz because they cannot refute the point she has made.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

but she didn't make any point  ::)

So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit?


Thicko Smith, you are the living embodiment of Moron.

****jittery on stilts, with garlic cannoli on top.

Go sweep. Don't break anything.

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 6:37pm:

Belgarion wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:09pm: Hanson has the usual suspects in a tizz because they cannot refute the point she has made.  ;D ;D ;D ;D but she didn't make any point  ::)

Her point was her being shut down by the Govt, to argue an issue.
In other words, the ALP bullied her freedom of speech.

You are a dumb gronk ::)

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 4:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: She made a good point - no she didn't

She made a good point -
she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it
but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion.
Is this a democracy or what?

It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.

It is a Communist like act.

Jasin wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:06pm:

It is a Communist like act.

She lost CCP social credit points for her thoughts.

It will be like that for all of us once Digital Govt ID tracks:
our every post on social media,
every purchase and
every movement we make.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 6:56pm:

So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit?

Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you!  :D :D :D

I already told you why censure her.  Ignoring my answer and asking over and over only highlights YOUR stupidity

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:15pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:56pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit? Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you!  :D :D :D I already told you why censure her.  Ignoring my answer and asking over and over only highlights YOUR stupidity

Hi John,
are you a Muslim apologist?
Do you think it's fair to force women to wear a Burqa?

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:05pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 4:26pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: She made a good point - no she didn't She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship.

she made no point. Off all the media coverage on this, NONE are discussing her 'point'.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:17pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:15pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:56pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit? Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you!  :D :D :D I already told you why censure her.  Ignoring my answer and asking over and over only highlights YOUR stupidity Hi John, are you a Muslim apologist? Do you think it's fair to force women to wear a Burqa?

I don't think it's fair that feel you have to hide your sexual preferences goober.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 6:56pm:

So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit?

She used a prop in a stunt.

That's not allowed in parliament.

How many times do you need this explained to you?

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:05pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 4:26pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: She made a good point - no she didn't She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship. she made no point. Off all the media coverage on this, NONE are discussing her 'point'.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh3wR_FAOn4

John Smith wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:15pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:56pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit? Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you!  :D :D :D I already told you why censure her.  Ignoring my answer and asking over and over only highlights YOUR stupidity Hi John, are you a Muslim apologist? Do you think it's fair to force women to wear a Burqa? I don't think it's fair that feel you have to hide your sexual preferences goober.

You're a poofter - not me.   ::)

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:20pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:17pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:15pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:56pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit? Not the sharpest tool in the shed are you!  :D :D :D I already told you why censure her.  Ignoring my answer and asking over and over only highlights YOUR stupidity Hi John, are you a Muslim apologist? Do you think it's fair to force women to wear a Burqa? I don't think it's fair that feel you have to hide your sexual preferences goober. You're a poofter - not me.   ::)

you just admitted that you are hiding that you are a poor :D :D

Bobby. wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:19pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:05pm: John Smith wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 4:26pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 2:05pm: She made a good point - no she didn't She made a good point - she wanted the Burqa banned and the Senate banned her for wearing it but wouldn't even let her put her private member's bill up for discussion. Is this a democracy or what? It sounds like a CCP dictatorship. she made no point. Off all the media coverage on this, NONE are discussing her 'point'. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh3wR_FAOn4

i said media ya dumbarse ... not her fan club crying that she is a victim :D :D :D

Smith. Does your wife know you are trying to solicit another man on the internet for some homo erotic foreplay❓

So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit?


Thicko Smith, you are the living embodiment of Moron.

****jittery on stilts, with garlic cannoli on top.

Go sweep. Don't break anything.

Shes stealing votes from LNP faster than gold medal runner at olympics and thats fantastic :)

LNP never again wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:46pm:

Shes stealing votes from LNP faster than gold medal runner at olympics and thats fantastic :)

The ALP are a carbon copy of the Democrats.

We were always certain that one party would eventually sell out to America.

Jasin wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:39pm:

Smith. Does your wife know you are trying to solicit another man on the internet for some homo erotic foreplay❓

Yes - I get chased by poofters on this forum all the time.   ::)

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:45pm:

So why censure her for NOT making a point, ...

She used a prop in a stunt.

That's not allowed in parliament.

How many times do you need this explained to you?

LNP never again wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:46pm:

Shes stealing votes from LNP faster than gold medal runner at olympics and thats fantastic :)

Pauline will be our next PM.

Vote #1 Pauline.

The suspension of Pauline Hanson from the Senate has proven

you CAN ban the burqa from Parliament.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 8:04pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you?

Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh??

Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people?

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 8:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people?

It's the use of a prop that was offensive.

Plus, it was a stunt.

You really are struggling to understand this, aren't you?

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 12:54pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 12:02pm: Dnarever wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:59am: Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa By far her most attractive look. Is this a replay of what she did years ago or didn't she learn her lesson the first time and just enjoys looking stupid ? Didn't learn her lesson   :-/ The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament

Its her most attractive look.

Dnarever wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 9:41pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 12:54pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 12:02pm: Dnarever wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 11:59am: Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa By far her most attractive look. Is this a replay of what she did years ago or didn't she learn her lesson the first time and just enjoys looking stupid ? Didn't learn her lesson   :-/ The burqa is not any less ridiculous and offensive outside parliament than in parliament Its her most attractive look.

She's no oil painting but she's right and that's all that matters.

wrote on :



Quote:

She's no oil painting but she's right and that's all that matters.

I have never seen anyone fight so hard for so long just to get their nose back into the trough. Last time she got anything right she was likely working in the fish shop.

Dnarever wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 10:18pm:

wrote on : Quote: She's no oil painting but she's right and that's all that matters. I have never seen anyone fight so hard for so long just to get their nose back into the trough. Last time she got anything right she was likely working in the fish shop.

Vote #1  Pauline Hanson.



Australia Didn’t Lose Manufacturing. It Was Signed Away. (The Lima Declaration)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iS3epIQqsOE

There are a couple there that could benefit from a burqa - to hide them away.... and a few who need a moral burqa... and the sun drew the clouds over his eyes to cover the visual stench ..... and the moon hid behind a veil of stars.... for now they knew what loathsome beasts had slouched to Bethlehem ....

https://i.imgur.com/dohanYJ.jpeg

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 8:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people?

Why are you allowed elsewhere but not in the senate?

John Smith wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 6:19am:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people? Why are you allowed elsewhere but not in the senate?

You are allowed. There is a public gallery.

Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 6:31am:

John Smith wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 6:19am: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people? Why are you allowed elsewhere but not in the senate? You are allowed. There is a public gallery.

then Pauline should have worn it in the public gallery. :D :D

Senator Pauline Hanson’s recent seven-day suspension from the Senate has triggered an outpouring of public support, with callers across Sydney radio making it clear they believe the punishment has only strengthened her standing.

Frank wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 8:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people?

Elsewhere is not Parliament.

Parliament is not the place for props and stunts.

It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about a prop being used to carry out a stunt in parliament.

That's not permitted.

If only she had threatened to burn down Parliament, there would be no problem at all.  ::)

https://www.onenation.org.au/hanson-unbothered-suspension

Pauline Hanson Unbothered by Suspension: “I Stand My Ground for Australians”

One Nation  November 25, 2025

Pauline Hanson has made it clear she is not worried about her one-week suspension from the Senate, standing firm on her beliefs despite backlash from all sides of politics. The transcript shows Hanson completely unfazed, refusing to bow to political pressure or attempts to silence her.

Hanson was suspended for seven sitting days after entering Parliament wearing a burqa  a move she says highlights serious concerns about women’s rights and national security. While Labor, Liberal, and Greens senators condemned her and voted for a censure motion, Hanson didn’t flinch.

Her comments reflect a broader sentiment across the country: Australians are tired of politicians who refuse to confront tough issues. Hanson’s defiance — even in the face of suspension shows exactly why One Nation continues to gain support.

The transcript also notes Hanson’s strategic engagement with Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce, fuelling speculation he could defect to One Nation another sign that the major parties may be losing control of their own ranks.

For Pauline Hanson, the suspension is meaningless compared to the responsibility she feels to speak for everyday Australians. She has made it clear that no ban, censure, or criticism will silence her fight for transparency, security, and the rights of all Australians.

One Nation’s message is stronger than ever:
When Parliament tries to silence Pauline Hanson, she speaks even louder  and Australians are listening.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 9:19am:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people? Elsewhere is not Parliament. Parliament is not the place for props and stunts. It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about a prop being used to carry out a stunt in parliament. That's not permitted.

The burqa is a  political prop and a stunt EVERYWHERE in Australia.  THere is ZERO legitimate reason for wearing it anywhere in Australia or any other Western country. It is prop to demonstrate hatred and total disrespect for Australia and its people, values customs.  Which is why Hanson wants to at least debate it's banning.

It should be ridiculed and shamed out of existence in Australia, Europe, Northe America.

Hanson Cartoon "Too Offensive" for Parliament!

Pauline Hanson’s satirical film A Super Progressive Movie was banned from screening at Parliament House for being potentially offensive.

The ban is another example of free speech being crushed by woke bureaucrats terrified of the truth.


see a short of the video:

https://www.asuperprogressivemovie.com/

Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 10:59am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 9:19am: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 8:04pm: Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 7:45pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, ... She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you? Not 'allowed' in parliament, eh?? Why is it 'allowed' anywhere else if it is so offensive in parliament, the house of the people? Elsewhere is not Parliament. Parliament is not the place for props and stunts. It's not about the burqa, per se, it's about a prop being used to carry out a stunt in parliament. That's not permitted. The burqa is a  political prop and a stunt EVERYWHERE in Australia.  THere is ZERO legitimate reason for wearing it anywhere in Australia or any other Western country.

Is there any legitimate reason for wearing a neck tie in Australia or any other Western country?

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/71Ok94nmDUL._AC_UY1000_.jpg


Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 10:59am:

Hanson wants to at least debate it's banning.

Sure, she can do that in parliament.

She can't pull stunts and use props though.

She's just a Media shock jock like Thorpe and a few others.
It's never about Politics.
It's about their egos and vanity and they should be banned from Politics entirely. They lower the standards.

Jasin wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 11:52am:

She's just a Media shock jock like Thorpe and a few others. It's never about Politics. It's about their egos and vanity and they should be banned from Politics entirely. They lower the standards.

100% agree.

Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 10:59am:

THere is ZERO legitimate reason for wearing it anywhere in Australia or any other Western country

ohhh francis doesn't like burquas ... boo hoo :'(

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 25^th, 2025 at 7:27pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 25th, 2025 at 6:56pm: So why censure her for NOT making a point, eyewateringly thick *** wit? She used a prop in a stunt. That's not allowed in parliament. How many times do you need this explained to you?

BS - Thorpe, Faruqi & others have done it also.

Flip

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/923/m1tZ88.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjedLeVGcfE

Jasin wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 12:20pm:

Flip

Sometimes you certainly are  :P

Apparently, you can wear the symbols of Islamic terror in Parliament and escape criticism or censure.

You can threaten to burn Parliament down and escape censure.

But you can’t wear a simple burqa and escape censure.

I never really expected anything else from these progressive weaklings.

My intention was never to offend, but simply to expose their hypocrisy.

And – oh my – was I successful.

I was never going to win that vote in Parliament, but it never mattered.

I’ve won the people.

And apparently you can’t even show a movie trailer in Parliament lampooning these ‘progressives’ because that will ‘offend’ them too.

This isn’t my first rodeo.

Idiot progressives will arbitrarily and selectively take offence at anything, hiding behind their contrived victimhood so they are never forced to debate these issues in a truly open contest of ideas.

They can’t win a debate like that on any issue precious to them, so they will always try to shut it down first.

What is sad is that the very seat of Australian democracy, whose officials should be utterly dedicated to upholding important democratic principles like free speech, do not understand it.

People always fear what they don’t understand, and Parliament has shown it in spades by cancelling our screening at the last minute.


Pauline Hanson

;D

---

This is a good look:-

---

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 1:51pm:

This is a good look:-

It's an improvement on your current look :D

Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 12:27pm:

Apparently, you can wear the symbols of Islamic terror in Parliament and escape criticism or censure. You can threaten to burn Parliament down and escape censure. But you can’t wear a simple burqa and escape censure.

She was using it as a prop in a childish stunt.

Props and stunts aren't permitted in parliament.

Pretty easy rules to follow.

Gnads wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 12:22pm:

Jasin wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 12:20pm: Flip Sometimes you certainly are  :P

Each schitt pancake 🥞.   :P

It is incredibly important for people to be able to see the face.

---

Woman cannot give evidence in a niqab, Australian court rules

Moutia Elzahed, whose husband was convicted of aiding terrorism, is denied request in her damages claim against police

1 December 2016

An Australian judge has declined a request from a Muslim woman to wear a niqab while giving evidence in a damages claim against police where she alleges that officers assaulted her during a raid on her home.

On Tuesday in the New South Wales district court, Judge Audrey Balla ruled on a request from Moutia Elzahed to wear her niqab while giving evidence to the court, in what may by one of the first rulings of its kind in Australia.

[...]

Counsel for the NSW police, Michael Spartalis, said it was their preference that she gave evidence without her face covered.

“Facial expressions is a very important part of giving evidence and, as I understand, it in these courts, in New South Wales at least, my understanding or recollection was that if you are here, you must show your face,” he said.

FULL STORY: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/dec/01/woman-cannot-give-evidence-in-a-niqab-australian-court-rules

MattE wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

It is incredibly important for people to be able to see the face. Woman cannot give evidence in a niqab, Australian court rules Moutia Elzahed, whose husband was convicted of aiding terrorism, is denied request in her damages claim against police 1 December 2025

"Then tell me, future boy, who's President of the United States in 1985?"

Jacinta Price wears Australian flag Greens are offended she has to remove it.

Pauline wears Burqa Greens and Leftards are outraged she had to remove it.

idiots claim it's a prop yet nothing is said about dead fish Greens senator Hanson Young brought in of Keffiyehs worn by Green senators.

Lefties say women should be able to choose what they wear yet are outraged when Pauline chose a Burqa and made her the only person in Australia banned from wearing it in Parliament.

Labor DEI hire Payman supports Burqa despite it not being a part of Afghan culture.

If Pauline visited Fatimas homeland she would be forced to wear the Burqa despite not being a muslim.

Massisve hypocrisy from the Left on this.

---

Baronvonrort wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 4:20pm:

idiots claim it's a prop yet nothing is said about dead fish Greens senator Hanson Young brought in of Keffiyehs worn by Green senators.

thats because no one was arguing it was allowed you dumb arse :D :D :D

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 3:43pm:

MattE wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 3:32pm: It is incredibly important for people to be able to see the face. Woman cannot give evidence in a niqab, Australian court rules Moutia Elzahed, whose husband was convicted of aiding terrorism, is denied request in her damages claim against police 1 December 2025 "Then tell me, future boy, who's President of the United States in 1985?"

It was an autocorrect issue.

I have corrected it.

Same issue though.

Hanson attempted to move a private member’s bill to ban the burqa and all full-face coverings, arguing it is vital for national security and women’s rights. When Labor, Liberal and the Greens refused to even debate it, Pauline made a bold point: if Parliament won’t discuss banning the burqa, why do they ban it being worn inside the Senate?

Frank wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 5:45pm:

Hanson attempted to move a private member’s bill to ban the burqa and all full-face coverings, arguing it is vital for national security and women’s rights. When Labor, Liberal and the Greens refused to even debate it, Pauline made a bold point: if Parliament won’t discuss banning the burqa, why do they ban it being worn inside the Senate?

https://www.onenation.org.au/defends-exposes-scandal

Jasin wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 2:54pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 12:22pm: Jasin wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 12:20pm: Flip Sometimes you certainly are  :P Each schitt pancake 🥞.   :P

I prefer butter & golden syrup  ;)

But Penny Wong said it was racism for Pauline Hanson to wear the burqa to prove a point.

What side is Penny Wong on? The side of women or the side of men who subjugate their wives?

https://i.ibb.co/dJMdTbmK/Screenshot-20251126-213439.png

A fantastic story by the Daily Mail, highlighting the facts.

Quote:

Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa

I would like to be able to ask has there ever been a worse Australian politician, unfortunately to our disgrace there have been.

Dnarever wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 9:03pm:

Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa I would like to be able to ask has there ever been a worse Australian politician, unfortunately to our disgrace there have been.

Vote #1 Pauline Hanson for PM.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 9:06pm:

Dnarever wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 9:03pm: Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa I would like to be able to ask has there ever been a worse Australian politician, unfortunately to our disgrace there have been. Vote #1 Pauline Hanson for PM.

Hang her high.

Quote:

In the first image, you see an Australian MP wearing a burqa in Parliament to debate banning the burqa for women. In the second image, it’s me and my friend, two women who have actually lived under the reality of forced burqas and hijabs imposed by the Taliban and the Islamic Republic appearing in an American TV. Now I learned that the debate on Banning the burqa wasn’t even allowed onto the floor of the Australian Senate. I understand these issues can feel politically risky. But let’s be honest: for us women of Iran and Afghanistan who lived under forced hijab and burqa, this is not an abstract political debate, it is the reality we survived. We were suffocated by it. I was beaten by Iran’s morality police for showing my hair. Afghan and Iranian girls have been lashed, even killed, just for talking about their rights. And even thousands of miles away, we face assassination plots for the “crime” of asking for a debate on forced hijab. This isn’t culture. It’s oppression, exported globally. What some call “culture,” we recognize as gender apartheid enforced by the Taliban and the Islamic Republic. This is why I want to extend an invitation to you @PaulineHansonOz, @SenatorPayman, and members of the Australian Parliament: Open your Parliament to those of us who lived under forced hijab and burqa. Let Afghan and Iranian women share the truth directly with you, to offer a clearer and more human understanding of what millions of women face today. Australia has a proud democratic tradition of hearing voices, not silencing discussion. Including us would honour that tradition. We don’t ask to be spoken about. We ask to be heard. https://x.com/AlinejadMasih/status/1993353830495371736 Masih Alinejad 🏳️ @AlinejadMasih They call It Islamophobia we call it…👇 In Iran I was told if I don’t wear hijab, I get kicked out from school, I get jailed, lashes, beaten up & kicked out from my country. In the West I’m told, sharing these stories will cause Islamophobia. #LetUsTalk

The hypocrisy of Labor and the Greens in claiming to support women when they embrace 7th century attitudes to women.

Jasin wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 9:25pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 9:06pm: Dnarever wrote on Nov 26th, 2025 at 9:03pm: Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa I would like to be able to ask has there ever been a worse Australian politician, unfortunately to our disgrace there have been. Vote #1 Pauline Hanson for PM. Hang her high.

She's the only one with the balls to stand up to woke nonsense.

Længe leve Danmark!!!

---

Who is actually going to vote for her though ? Lnp voters were all going to vote her party last election and she won 1 seat ... no idea who voted LNP as they got hammmmmmered

Hanson is a fraud.
Pushing her so-called anti-Lefty One Nation for years.
But being totally dependent upon Media attention exactly like a Lefty.

Jasin wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 4:37am:

Hanson is a fraud. Pushing her so-called anti-Lefty One Nation for years. But being totally dependent upon Media attention exactly like a Lefty.

Hanson is the real deal -
the only honest politician in Canberra.

She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else.
She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate.

Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk.

Jasin wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 5:29am:

She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else. She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate. Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk.

She is a little bit xenophobic -

not that .....

Like I said. She is an 'Anti'.
She is more 'anti' everyone from around the world, than she is 'pro' anything domestically Australian because, despite being a Queenslander (Victorians and West Australians are also like Queenslanders) of 'inner looking' (but ignorant of the external world) - she has exhibited very minimal understanding of Australian cultures... and there are many, just like States.

So yes, she proclaims herself a prime example of Australianism in defiance of foreign or non-australianism expressions here. But besides just wrapping herself in a flag, beating her chest and making goat bleatings about things in this country not going her 'Queenslander' way in regards to what is 'seen' on the Lefty TV Media Show.
She really HAS NOT PROVIDED any progressive NEW OFFERINGS examples of Australianisms, originalisms and cultural independence beyond making a TV show of Politics.
Like I've said. Her One Nation concept is a backwardness into our political past and has even probably been a major influence in derailing any 'domestic multi-culturalisms' between our States to Provincials - which have become now a Mediocre Sameness back to when this country first started not long after 1788.

She provides NO FUTURE for this country, in any political way.

But she, like Thorpe and the others provide us with nothing more than a MEDIA REALITY SHOW in parliament with the usual narcissistic (and other negative psychological traits) biatch fighting, backstabbing, verbal vitriol that you find promoted on Media Reality Shows anyway.

Hanson flaunts herself as an Anti-Villain, but like all Anti-Villains - she'll leave nothing but destruction in her wake with nothing to offer in the way of benefitting others, in the end.

Vote for Hanson/One Nation and you vote for a political act that causes division, despite its claim of 'oneness', but for all the wrong reasons that are not culturally enriching - but for reasons of violence in the name of ANTI, rather than promoting PRO.
Big difference.

Hanson V The Left...❓
Two very bad Wrongs, not making a right.
But hey, that's the reality of their show.

Dnarever wrote on Nov 26^th, 2025 at 9:03pm:

Quote: Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa I would like to be able to ask has there ever been a worse Australian politician, unfortunately to our disgrace there have been.

Sarah Hanson Young, Lydia Thorpe, Mereen Faruqi, Fatima Payman????

Most any that are Greens & or Labor rejects.

Jasin wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 4:37am:

Hanson is a fraud. Pushing her so-called anti-Lefty One Nation for years. But being totally dependent upon Media attention exactly like a Lefty.

Rubbish - more genuine than most.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 5:32am:

Jasin wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:29am: She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else. She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate. Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk. She is a little bit xenophobic - not that .....

More BS. Trendoid word used by leftoids.

And the way things are going in Western democracies, including Australia should have you a little worried if not scared.

Senator Pauline Hanson this week strode into the red chamber wearing a short skirt and a long black burqa, all the better to protest the Senate’s refusal to even debate her motion to introduce a federal ban on the burqa.

There was of course much howling and  screeching from the miserable cohort of female senators who quite happily don a keffiyeh or prance around in possum cloaks as part of their own parliamentary pantomimes. Hyprocrisy and humbug are alive and well in the Canberra bubble.

The burqa is both literally and metaphorically the ultimate symbol of the failed policy of multiculturalism without assimilation; a medieval garment devoid of style or beauty that is primarily used as a tool of female oppression. As with other even less savoury cultural practices, it serves to deny a woman agency of her own looks and sexuality, reducing her instead to a form of chattel. On top of which the burqa alienates the immigrant woman from any hope of successfully intergrating fully into our Australian way of life.

At least 20 countries have implemented burqa bans, spanning Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. There are many reasons for such bans. Shame on the Senate for even refusing to debate the matter.

https://russiancouncil.ru/upload/iblock/fc7/iranianwoman.jpg

In an interview published by Iranian state-owned broadcaster Press TV earlier this week, the former Labor backbencher Fatima Payman appeared to say that Iran was an "incredible place" for women, where "their voices are heard".

:o

"Before the 2028 election, Pauline Hanson would have us believe One Nation is a mainstream force in Australian politics.

"The fundamental ugliness she unleashed this week with her performance suggests she’ll stay a bit player."

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 11:32am:

"Before the 2028 election, Pauline Hanson would have us believe One Nation is a mainstream force in Australian politics. "The fundamental ugliness she unleashed this week with her performance suggests she’ll stay a bit player."

The Granuiad. 

Frank - why does the title disappear when you post?

Pauline Hanson wears the Burqa

Gnads wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:32am: Jasin wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:29am: She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else. She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate. Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk. She is a little bit xenophobic - not that ..... More BS. Trendoid word used by leftoids. And the way things are going in Western democracies, including Australia should have you a little worried if not scared.

Well I think most of us prefer good British stock?

We're all bloody British.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Gnads wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 8:53am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:32am: Jasin wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:29am: She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else. She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate. Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk. She is a little bit xenophobic - not that ..... More BS. Trendoid word used by leftoids. And the way things are going in Western democracies, including Australia should have you a little worried if not scared. Well I think most of us prefer good British stock? We're all bloody British.

No, it disappears.

It only shows

Re:

Frank wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 12:51pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Gnads wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 8:53am: Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:32am: Jasin wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 5:29am: She is an incompetent imbecile that constantly struggles to express political professionalism and clear communication because she is entirely based upon 'ANTIsm' with no clear 'PRO' for anything else. She is as mad as the Left she claims to fight against but she is just like the Left in all their madness, because ANTI's 'reflect', never originate. Voting for Hanson is like Voting for Monk. She is a little bit xenophobic - not that ..... More BS. Trendoid word used by leftoids. And the way things are going in Western democracies, including Australia should have you a little worried if not scared. Well I think most of us prefer good British stock? We're all bloody British. No, it disappears. It only shows Re:

Indeed.
And the Brits are half-Danish.  8-)

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 11:32am:

"Before the 2028 election, Pauline Hanson would have us believe One Nation is a mainstream force in Australian politics. "The fundamental ugliness she unleashed this week with her performance suggests she’ll stay a bit player."

Personally. I think you ARE Pauline Hanson

Jasin wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 12:59pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 11:32am: "Before the 2028 election, Pauline Hanson would have us believe One Nation is a mainstream force in Australian politics. "The fundamental ugliness she unleashed this week with her performance suggests she’ll stay a bit player." Personally. I think you ARE Pauline Hanson

Please explain.

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

We're all bloody British.

No we're not ::)

wrote on :

John Smith wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 12:29pm: We're all bloody British. No we're not ::)

What are you, then? 

Albanian?

Frank wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 1:20pm:

wrote on : John Smith wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 12:29pm: We're all bloody British. No we're not ::) What are you, then?  Albanian?

Not British ::)

John Smith wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 1:23pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 1:20pm: wrote on : John Smith wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 12:29pm: We're all bloody British. No we're not ::) What are you, then?  Albanian? Not British ::)

You are obviously ashamed of it, whatever it is.

Frank wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 3:22pm:

You are obviously ashamed of it, whatever it is.

I most certainly am not a clog wearer ... you take that back!

John Smith wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 3:56pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 3:22pm: You are obviously ashamed of it, whatever it is. I most certainly am not a clog wearer ... you take that back!

You are ashamed of it, whatever your background.

John Smith wrote on Nov 27^th, 2025 at 1:23pm:

Frank wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 1:20pm: wrote on : John Smith wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Bobby. wrote on Nov 27th, 2025 at 12:29pm: We're all bloody British. No we're not ::) What are you, then?  Albanian? Not British ::)

Italian?

https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1764154346