Tasmania’s stadium plan means a billion for footy, nothing for housing   :(

November 21 2025
Green Left Weekly.
Tasmanian Liberal Premier Jeremy Rockliff urged parliament to approve the new Australian Football League (AFL) stadium at Macquarie Point.

The controversial stadium, planned for Hobart’s waterfront, is a proposed 23,000-seat roofed venue. The AFL and AFL Women’s have made a modern, enclosed stadium central to their conditions for Tasmania securing a team.


Stadium, poverty and environment polarise Tasmanian election
Thousands protest new AFL stadium, call for funds for housing and health
The amount of funding expected from the state and federal governments has shifted over the more than three years of debate, raising even more questions about its viability.

The Liberals pledged to cap its capital contribution at $375 million. Federal Labor has committed $240 million and the AFL has agreed to $15 million.

Everything beyond that — the bulk of the stadium’s cost — is expected to be covered by loans.

Labor and the Liberals claim it will be a good investment, delivering long-term economic benefits. But critics point to figures from the Tasmanian Planning Commission, which said the stadium should not proceed.

Two independent MLCs have also voiced concerns about a new stadium that would add $1.8 billion to the state’s debt over 10 years; net debt is predicted to exceed $10 billion by 2028.

Since the initial stadium bill was introduced in 2023, cost estimates have risen sharply.

Originally expected to be $715 million, it quickly rose to $775 million and then $945 million. Now the expected price has risen by a further $185 million, taking it to $1.13 billion. And the total cost estimate is expected to continue to rise.

The Macquarie Point Stadium Enabling Bill passed the House of Assembly on November 13, by 25 votes to 9. Apart from its cost and impact on state debt, key concerns remain over whether the allocation of public funds could be better used addressing failing state infrastructure and meeting community needs.

The next step in the stadium’s approval depends on a majority vote in the Legislative Council on December 3 and 4.

Labor, which opposed the stadium until just before the election in July when it opportunistically flipped, and the Liberals are strongly in support, with six of the eight required votes.

However, Independent MLCs Bec Thomas and Dean Harriss are now speaking out about the cost blowouts, debt risk and equity.

Economist Dr Nicholas Gruen warned in an independent report commissioned by the government that the benefits are “overstated”, while the risks are “significantly understated”.   :(

Gruen told the ABC that the stadium project “can reasonably be estimated to exceed $1 billion, with a benefit-cost ratio of 44 cents in every dollar invested in Tasmania”.

“This means its economic losses are twice its gains,” Chris Jenkins, from the Lutruwita Socialist Alliance, told Green Left.

Jenkins pointed to the Tasmanian Planning Commission’s report, which said the stadium would “diminish the economic welfare of the state”, citing excessive debt, weak projected benefits and landscape and heritage damage.

The commission’s report noted that the government’s initial construction debt would begin at $1 billion, before rising to $1.8 billion over the next decade.

“Taxes would need to increase by $50 million a year for 30 years from the implementation date, creating even more of a burden on households amid a cost-of-living crisis,” said Jenkins.

He noted that the projected debt of $1.8 billion over 10 years would directly undermine funding for essential state infrastructure. “This means less room for hospitals, housing, education and essential social services that are already rapidly backsliding.”

“Right now, more than 5200 people are on waiting lists for housing — a rise of 10.1% since 2023–24. This is the largest it has ever been. The average wait time is 82 weeks.

“Tasmania also faces one of the worst hospital bed shortages in Australia and ambulance ramping has doubled in the past five years. Public schools are in desperate need of maintenance.   :(

“Tasmanians have also indicated in several polls, the latest one in June, that housing, healthcare and cost of living are their greatest concerns.”

Jenkins pointed to the commission’s report, which said Tasmania lacks the required infrastructure — including transport upgrades, access roads, parking, sewerage and adequate short-stay accommodation — to support the stadium and its expected visitor influx.

The enabling law also hands the planning minister extraordinary powers to fast-track the stadium project and future controversial ones.

“Trying to fast-track this stadium highlights how removed the major parties are from ordinary people’s lives and concerns; they want their tax dollars spent on public institutions that function for them,” Jenkins said.

Quote:

Tasmania’s stadium plan means a billion for footy, nothing for housing.

Is anyone surprised by this?

I'm not.

I stopped being surprised by things like this a long, long time ago.

And it's the same everywhere in Australia. Every State and Territory.

Politicians having their strings pulled by (and probably also being bribed by) big business.

What next?
Billions of taxpayer's money being spent on a bubble bath in Sudan?

Carl D wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 11:31am:

Quote: Tasmania’s stadium plan means a billion for footy, nothing for housing. Is anyone surprised by this? I'm not. I stopped being surprised by things like this a long, long time ago. And it's the same everywhere in Australia. Every State and Territory. Politicians having their strings pulled by (and probably also being bribed by) big business.

A LOT less money will refurbish/enlarge an excellent existing stadium in Launceston.

Sports money should go to community events/clubs, lift the general fitness and health. Big sports spends a lot of money for a very few people.

Tassie Council will put the rates up to help pay it off. ;D