Inside MRNA Vaccines - The Movie

3 YT's



"Not one more shot should be delivered."

------ >

111111

Scientist Jessica Rose
Not one more shot should be delivered

01 min
Sep 21, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yASkudXd91A


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yASkudXd91A




222222

Inside mRNA Vaccines
The Movie

1h 01 min
Aug 12, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZrJraN2nOQ


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZrJraN2nOQ




Quote:

Inside mRNA Vaccines - The Movie Description.... This film explores the unprecedented global rollout of mRNA vaccine technology - and the complex scientific and regulatory questions it continues to raise. www.insidemrnavaccines.com

333333

Inside the Vaccine Trials
Lived Experiences

1h 10 min
Jul 9, 2025

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRvhFpP5wOE


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HRvhFpP5wOE




Quote:

Inside the Vaccine Trials This film offers an intimate look into the lives of vaccine trial volunteers. These individuals came forward with hope and trust, only to encounter serious, lasting health complications. Now, as they navigate a system that offers little support, their stories shed light on a larger concern: post-vaccine health problems are often ignored, and their voices are suppressed under intense censorship.

.


MINE.........
An 'accepted consensus' from on high, is not proof of,  ....'Science' [as an 'outcome'].

Any consensus view, from [a group of] [self described, self enriching] scientists, is not Science,
and can never be an 'ironclad' [faultless] determination....about anything.

One definition of Science is......The continuing critiquing of any [presently] 'accepted' hypothesis.

Real Science [i.e. real scientific endeavour], is about seeking out exceptions and anomalies,
and also, then trying to explain the reason for those exceptions and anomalies.


hypothesis = = a supposition or proposed explanation made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.

anomaly = = something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected.

Certainly it's telling that the government now will not recommend the vaccine for any healthy individual under 65.

A health professional administering it to such a person is open to litigation and it is not a recommended vaccine.

If it's not harmful, why the change of mind.

aquascoot wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 7:04am:

Certainly it's telling that the government now will not recommend the vaccine for any healthy individual under 65. A health professional administering it to such a person is open to litigation and it is not a recommended vaccine. If it's not harmful, why the change of mind.

Yes, because it is just SO much better to have the population repeatedly infected with a dangerous heart, brain and other organs damaging SARS virus, isn't it?

The UK is now finding out what a great idea that was. But, I'm sure they're ignoring the reason why this is happening, of course.

And, as I said - Australia is undoubtedly next (it is probably already happening).

Looks like aqua will have to work even harder and pay more tax to pay for all the people soon to be on sickness benefits like in the UK.

The Australian government may eventually wake up to the fact that it might have been better (and cheaper) for their precious economy to buy new, up to date Covid vaccines and inform people that they need to be vaccinated rather than their current "policy" of ignoring Covid and the vaccines.

Incorrect

The government have to pay for the health costs of the population.

It's why they pay for screening of poo for blood and free breast screens

It saves them in the long run


So someone thinks the vaccine is going to injure more people then it helps

That's the basis of health policy


Thank God they listen to scientists and not conspiracy theory hypochondriac pensioners from perth

By the way - I'm still waiting for proof that SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is now just a "mild respiratory virus" as you've claimed many times here.

Real scientific proof from real scientists and medical experts.

Not from government "health" ministers or spokespersons or social media posts or memes.

I've been asking for this for at least 2 years now and it doesn't look like I'm any closer to getting it than I was 2 years ago.

Carl D wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 8:37am:

By the way - I'm still waiting for proof that SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is now just a "mild respiratory virus" as you've claimed many times here. Real scientific proof from real scientists and medical experts. Not from government "health" ministers or spokespersons or social media posts or memes. I've been asking for this for at least 2 years now and it doesn't look like I'm any closer to getting it than I was 2 years ago.

The term mild is subjective.

A warrior in kokoda fought the Japanese whilst having a temperature of 40 from malaria and severely dehydrated from dysentery.

A pensioner in perth probably thinks a sore throat , runny nose and a cough is a severe illness and calls his GP for a house call

Yadda wrote on Nov 22^nd, 2025 at 8:49pm:

Scientist Jessica Rose

Lol   ;D

Many of the review’s authors have a history of spreading COVID-19 or vaccine misinformation. This includes Kirsch, who has repeatedly pushed the incorrect idea that the COVID-19 vaccines have killed millions of people worldwide, as well as Dr. Peter McCullough, Stephanie Seneff and Jessica Rose.

Rose has also been accused of misusing VAERS data to claim vaccines are not safe — a common deception among the anti-vaccination community.

The Cureus review cites and even republishes a figure from one of Rose’s Substack posts about the supposedly alarming number of VAERS reports for “autoimmune disorders” following COVID-19 vaccination compared with influenza vaccines. The review claims the increased reporting “represents an immense safety signal.” But as we’ve explained before, the higher number of VAERS reports for the COVID-19 vaccines can be explained by multiple factors, such as increased awareness and stricter reporting requirements – and does not in and of itself constitute a safety signal. A report can be submitted by anyone and does not mean that a vaccine caused a particular problem.

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 1:18pm:

Yadda wrote on Nov 22nd, 2025 at 8:49pm: Scientist Jessica Rose Lol   ;D Many of the review’s authors have a history of spreading COVID-19 or vaccine misinformation. This includes Kirsch, who has repeatedly pushed the incorrect idea that the COVID-19 vaccines have killed millions of people worldwide, as well as Dr. Peter McCullough, Stephanie Seneff and Jessica Rose. Rose has also been accused of misusing VAERS data to claim vaccines are not safe — a common deception among the anti-vaccination community. The Cureus review cites and even republishes a figure from one of Rose’s Substack posts about the supposedly alarming number of VAERS reports for “autoimmune disorders” following COVID-19 vaccination compared with influenza vaccines. The review claims the increased reporting “represents an immense safety signal.” But as we’ve explained before, the higher number of VAERS reports for the COVID-19 vaccines can be explained by multiple factors, such as increased awareness and stricter reporting requirements – and does not in and of itself constitute a safety signal. A report can be submitted by anyone and does not mean that a vaccine caused a particular problem.

Fact Check: VAERS data does not suggest COVID-19 vaccines killed 150,000 people, as analysis claims

"Healthcare providers are required to report any death after vaccination to VAERS even if there is no indication it was caused by the vaccine, and reported incidents are not evidence of a causal link".

greggerypeccary wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 1:41pm:

Fact Check: VAERS data does not suggest COVID-19 vaccines killed 150,000 people, as analysis claims "Healthcare providers are required to report any death after vaccination to VAERS even if there is no indication it was caused by the vaccine, and reported incidents are not evidence of a causal link".

Many doctors reported that Vaccine Injury reports which they submitted,
did not end up [appear] on the VAERS Vaccine Injury registry.  !!!

It appears, that the persons in control of that VAERS Vaccine Injury registries [worldwide],
were criminally scrubbing [not entering the data of] a great number of submissions of Vaccine Injury.


WWW search....
submitted VAERS Vaccine Injury reports, were being
submitted Vaccine Injury reports disappeared from VAERS

WWW search....
5 yrs later - The Largest Vaccine Experiment and Weakest Ever Safety Monitoring



The mRNA COVID-19 rollout was a barrel of deceit and lies.

And those 'JABS' were not vaccines.

They [the JAB 'vaccines'] have been accepted as have being 'gene therapy technology',
and were NOT modeled on any contemporary vaccine technology.

They [the rolled out 'jabs'] were NOT 'vaccines' in any truthful sense,
of the meaning of that description.


That is described in the YT, in the OP......

Inside mRNA Vaccines
The Movie
Aug 12, 2025
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BZrJraN2nOQ

@54.00
"mRNA - it was gene therapy technology,
being used for vaccine purposes"

Here you go, Yadda.

I posted this a couple of weeks back but I believe it deserves a repeat.

http://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/media_G4i9h_8a8AQtfGJ.jpg

:)

Yeah doubtful it would alter your genetic code but the truth is
It didn't work
It was never properly tested
Now that there is no emergency provision, it should undergo the 10 years of trials that vaccines are required to go through.
Until then , the scientists are wise to withdraw it.

Carl D wrote on Nov 23^rd, 2025 at 6:07pm:

Here you go, Yadda. I posted this a couple of weeks back but I believe it deserves a repeat. http://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/media_G4i9h_8a8AQtfGJ.jpg :)

@Reply #9,

Carl D,

No one said that [i.e. what the text in your image conveys].

I did not say, i did not imply that.


What i will say, is.......
I, and many others, believe that those mRNA JABS >> were designed [intentionally???] << to change the way that our immune system responded to the spike protein [introduced into the body, in the JAB].

And that it was the JAB which induced and caused, a corruption of >> our own immune system response <<,
in many of those persons who took the mRNA [>> not a <<] vaccine JAB.


FURTHER.....
Do you know what a cytokine storm is ?

What an anaphylactic shock is ?

What an auto-immune response is ?


These immune responses will happen, if we have a 'machine' [e.g. mRNA programmed instructions] in our body,
which causes our immune system to first target, and then destroy [our own] cells associated with a foreign spike protein,
a foreign spike protein [introduced and] PRODUCED inside our body by the mRNA instructions to our own body's cell/protein replication.

I believe, that is what happened, within the bodies of many people, who were persuaded to accept the mRNA JABS.

Our own immune system can produce a harmful, 'Haywire' response,
to antigens which 'appear' inside our body.

haywire = = erratic; out of control.

antigen = = a substance which the body recognizes as alien and which induces an immune response.


FURTHER.....
We have been informed, that   ~7 million people   died of the COVID-19 pathogen [i.e. and many are trying to convince us, that their deaths were    NOT the consequence    of the changes that the JAB made, inside the bodies of those who 'succumbed'].

Believe that if you will.

I know what i believe.

Re the content of my post......Reply #11,

I'm not a scientist......like bobby.

I forgot which mob of the COVID vaccines...
...but one of them also pinpointed the basis of the Black Death which originated in the Khirgizstan area and took 10 years to reach Europe long ago. More Plague than Pandemic. Fleas.
Might be the MRNA mob, not the AstraZeneca mob.

Apparently the Black Plague is still around.

Yep

Flip