Australian Politics Forum

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth violated federal law by using the US military to help carry out law enforcement activities in and around Los Angeles this summer.

US District Judge Charles Breyer concluded that Trump’s use of thousands of federalized California National Guard members and US Marines to provide protection to federal agents during an aggressive immigration crackdown in the Los Angeles area ran afoul of the Posse Comitatus Act, a 19th Century law that generally prohibits the use of troops for domestic law enforcement purposes.

The ruling from Breyer, who held a multi-day trial last month over Trump’s use of the military in the state, comes as the president is weighing whether to send National Guard members to other cities, including ones in California and Illinois.

“President Trump and Secretary Hegseth have stated their intention to call National Guard troops into service in other cities across the country,” Breyer wrote in his 52-page opinion, “… thus creating a national police force with the President as its chief.”

“The evidence at trial established that Defendants systematically used armed soldiers (whose identity was often obscured by protective armor) and military vehicles to set up protective perimeters and traffic blockades, engage in crowd control, and otherwise demonstrate a military presence in and around Los Angeles. In short, Defendants violated the Posse Comitatus Act,” Breyer wrote.

In an effort to stave off further violations of the Posse Comitatus Act in California, Breyer blocked Trump and Hegseth from using troops there for “arrests, apprehensions, searches, seizures, security patrols, traffic control, crowd control, riot control, evidence collection, interrogation, or acting as informants.”

The judge paused that part of his ruling until next Friday to give the administration time to appeal it.

Though Breyer’s decision to bar Trump and Hegseth from continuing to use the troops in California for law enforcement purposes may stand as a warning shot to them ahead of any similar deployments around the country, his ruling is limited to the Golden State.

“Los Angeles was the first US city where President Trump and Secretary Hegseth deployed troops, but not the last,” Breyer wrote.

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom sued Trump and Hegseth in June after Trump federalized members of his state’s militia in the wake of protests in the LA area over the administration’s hardline immigration policies.

“The people of California won much needed accountability against Trump’s ILLEGAL militarization of an American city!” the governor’s office wrote in a post on X after Breyer issued his decision.

Breyer, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton who sits in San Fransisco, initially ruled in June that Trump unlawfully called the troops into service and ordered the president to return control of them back to the governor. A federal appeals court later said Trump can maintain control of the troops while the legal challenge plays out.

But a major claim at the center of Newsom’s case remained unaddressed by the two courts: whether the troops were violating the Posse Comitatus Act when they did things like accompany federal agents on raids in the LA area or temporarily detain civilians who tried to enter restricted areas.

Breyer decided they had. He said in his ruling Tuesday that instructions the troops in California – collectively known as Task Force 51 – were given that said they could set up traffic blockades, maintain protective perimeters or help with crowd control were “incorrect.” The judge said the troops’ presence alongside federal agents, which at times either matched or outnumbered those agents, “pervade the activities of those civilian agents.”

“This was intentional – defendants instigated a months-long deployment of the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles for the purpose of establishing a military presence there and enforcing federal law. Such conduct is a serious violation of the Posse Comitatus Act,” Breyer wrote.

“(T)hese violations were part of a top-down, systemic effort by Defendants to use military troops to execute various sectors of federal law (the drug laws and the immigration laws at least) across hundreds of miles and over the course of several months – and counting.”

https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/02/politics/national-guard-california-trump-posse-comitatus-act-breyer

Hardly surprising that the Judge reached this decision - it was clear to anyone with a brain stem that what Trump was/is doing was/is illegal.

We should just report when Trump does something legal... Save everyone's time.

This administration breaks a different law every day.

Trump will die soon, so he'll never face any consequences.

Hopefully though, when the Dems are back in the White House, people like Hegseth, RFK, Noem, Gabbard, Kash, et al. will pay for their crimes.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2025 at 10:46am:

Not soon enough, but regardless, it will take many years to fix the damage he has caused - if it ever can be truly repaired. He is absolutely the worst thing to happen to US politics, period.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2025 at 11:02am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 3^rd, 2025 at 10:46am:

Not soon enough, but regardless, it will take many years to fix the damage he has caused - if it ever can be truly repaired. He is absolutely the worst thing to happen to US politics, period.

Yes, certainly not soon enough.

I'm sure Melania would agree too.

And yes, it will take a decade at least to fix the damage he's done - he truly is one of the worst Americans who have ever lived.

I just hope he ignores his doctor's advice and refuses to take his medication and keeps eating Maccas and KFC ~~three~~ five or six times a day.

Yet the use of troops in domestic law enforcement has a long history in the US and Trump is hardly the first president to do so. In fact the oath sworn by all US military personnel mentions defending against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

This is just more anti-Trump hysteria. ::)