I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell.

My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......


Quote:

But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it.

Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~ HE DOES NOT ASK.

And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

Release the Trumpstein files.

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island.......

In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Marla wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 5:15am:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend.

Really?  I guess we read different things...

It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are.

That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 5:15am: Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend. Really?  I guess we read different things... It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are. That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Sadroo can you provide all the evidence you have of Trump ever being involved with Epstein, I want to compare that evidence with how that affects anyone in the same situation.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 9:03am:

Marla wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 5:15am: Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend. Really?  I guess we read different things... It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are. That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection.

Indeed.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29^th, 2025 at 11:29am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 9:03am: Marla wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 5:15am: Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend. Really?  I guess we read different things... It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are. That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection. Indeed. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED --------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

When was the trial?

I mean Trump was charged with book keeping errors, so surely if this had legs , there would have been a trial.

Oh , there wasn't one?

Must have been vexacious

The daughter of former Labor prime minister Paul Keating has revealed details of a dinner she went to with notorious convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

As part of the ongoing investigation by US congress into the so-called Epstein files, Katherine Keating was revealed to have attended a dinner with Epstein, organised by disgraced royal Prince Andrew.

In an email dated February 16, 2011, Epstein asked Andrew to organise a dinner with then 29-year-old socialite Ms Keating, to which the prince responded “will do”.

“Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?” the invite read.

More than 14 years on, Ms Keating confirmed she had attended the dinner with Epstein along with a “sizeable chunk of NY society”.

“I did attend a February dinner at Andrew’s invitation – a large social event,” she told the Mail on Sunday. “A sizeable chunk of NY society was there, including Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and Katie Couric.”

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... Quote: But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it. Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~ HE DOES NOT ASK. And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

But of course. Todd Blanche is DL's personal attorney. He's not the deputy DOJ Director, Aussie, not really.

All of them are there for one reason only. Not even Putin has client/attorney privilege with his underlings, only DL.

aquascoot wrote on Aug 30^th, 2025 at 6:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 11:29am: ProudKangaroo wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 9:03am: Marla wrote on Aug 29th, 2025 at 5:15am: Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... In other words, Blanche's interview wasn't racist, bigoted or pseudo-Christian for you to comprehend. Really?  I guess we read different things... It read to me like Aussie was stunned that the second Maxwell started to touch on the "list" of island visitors, Blanche shut it down to shield Trump from being named, making both her and Trump look cleaner than they are. That doesn't smack of incompetence, it reeks of deliberate protection. Indeed. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED --------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION When was the trial? I mean Trump was charged with book keeping errors, so surely if this had legs , there would have been a trial. Oh , there wasn't one? Must have been vexacious

Where are all your pics of the Clinton's on Epstein Airlines?

You seem to have gone rather shy, dear.

Why is that, do you think?

Frank wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 8:12am:

The daughter of former Labor prime minister Paul Keating has revealed details of a dinner she went to with notorious convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. As part of the ongoing investigation by US congress into the so-called Epstein files, Katherine Keating was revealed to have attended a dinner with Epstein, organised by disgraced royal Prince Andrew. In an email dated February 16, 2011, Epstein asked Andrew to organise a dinner with then 29-year-old socialite Ms Keating, to which the prince responded “will do”. “Would you ask Katherine Keating if she would like to come for dinner with Woody Allen next week in New York?” the invite read. More than 14 years on, Ms Keating confirmed she had attended the dinner with Epstein along with a “sizeable chunk of NY society”. “I did attend a February dinner at Andrew’s invitation – a large social event,” she told the Mail on Sunday. “A sizeable chunk of NY society was there, including Barbara Walters, Charlie Rose and Katie Couric.”

Hey, old boy, it is rumoured that the former PM in Guiffre's book is none other than KRudd.

Up for a bit of LAWFARE?

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

Jane doe ;)

Bring on charge 35.

0/34....not a good strike rate

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 11:23am:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------- JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym, Plaintiff, v. DONALD J. TRUMP and JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED --------------------------------------------------------------- COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS, SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff
to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

Aussie wrote on Aug 28^th, 2025 at 5:32pm:

I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... Quote: But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it. Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~ HE DOES NOT ASK. And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there??????????

Blanche wasn't there to conduct a proper investigation or interview. He was there for one reason and one reason only - to find out how compromised Trump is and to convince Maxwell to keep it to herself. That's why she was moved to a different prison. I reckon Blanche made certain promises to her in exchange for her silence.

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 1:02pm:

Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... Quote: But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it. Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~ HE DOES NOT ASK. And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there?????????? Blanche wasn't there to conduct a proper investigation or interview. He was there for one reason and one reason only - to find out how compromised Trump is and to convince Maxwell to keep it to herself. That's why she was moved to a different prison. I reckon Blanche made certain promises to her in exchange for her silence.

100%

Jane doe  ;D

That's right, folks: aquascoot is laughing at child rape.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------
JANE DOE, proceeding under a pseudonym,
Plaintiff,
v.
DONALD J. TRUMP and
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No.:
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
---------------------------------------------------------------
COMPLAINT FOR RAPE, SEXUAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL SEXUAL ACTS,
SEXUAL ABUSE, FORCIBLE TOUCHING, ASSAULT, BATTERY, INTENTIONAL
AND RECKLESS INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS, DURESS, FALSE
IMPRISONMENT, AND DEFAMATION

Jane doe  ;D

There is no one in the US establishment and the upper echelons of politics in most other countries who wants these files to ever see the light of day. There will be far too much revealed about the lifestyles of the rich and powerful, no matter what their political persuasion.

Quote:

Convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell once bragged that she performed a sex act on actor George Clooney during a party, Jeffery Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre claimed “But she had given George Clooney a blow job in the bathroom at some random event. … She never let that one down,” she added. It remains unclear when and where such an event would’ve taken place, with Clooney among the members of Hollywood’s elite who have never been linked or seen publicly with Epstein Representatives for Clooney did not respond to The Post’s request for comment Sunday. https://nypost.com/2025/10/26/world-news/ghislaine-maxwell-claimed-she-performed-sex-act-on-george-clooney-virginia-giuffres-memoir-alleges/?utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social

Clooney told Biden to step down and let Kamala run for POTUS

It said a lot about American 'Media' and Hollywood politics during those times having anything to do with those two Slugs of Slime & Sleaze.

Author Michael Wolff sues Melania Trump over Jeffrey Epstein threat

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BYmNiODAyNDYtNTU4OS00MjMxLWEyNzUtODFlNjc4Y2U1NmJjXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_QL75_UY281_CR155,0,190,281_.jpg

Author Michael Wolff has sued first lady Melania Trump, charging that she threatened a $1 billion legal action against him to stop him from reporting and writing about her alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein.

"Mrs. Trump's claims are made for the sole purpose of harassing, intimidating, punishing or otherwise maliciously inhibiting Mr. Wolff's free exercise of speech," said the suit, which was filed Tuesday in New York Supreme Court in Manhattan.

The filing includes as an attachment a letter Trump's attorney, Alejandro Brito, sent to Wolff, the author of “Fire and Fury,” last week demanding that he retract and apologize for public comments he has made linking his client to Epstein, the notorious sex offender, and that he make "a monetary proposal to Mrs. Trump to ameliorate the harm that you have caused."

greggerypeccary wrote on Oct 27^th, 2025 at 1:06pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on Oct 27th, 2025 at 1:02pm: Aussie wrote on Aug 28th, 2025 at 5:32pm: I have been slowly reading through the transcript of the 'interview' Blanche had with Maxwell. My first thought was how badly Blanche conducted the interview especially given he is supposed to be an accomplished Lawyer (he was all over the place, asking questions which produced mostly vague answers, except when Maxwell needed to appear as an innocent, and he never sought to drill down on her answers,) but there is this eye opener....this is Maxwell talking about who had been down to Epstein's Lolita Island....... Quote: But did I, like, think these guys were coming for that? I really don't know. If you met Epstein, there is no way that this cast of character, of which it's extraordinary, and some are in your cabinet, who you value as your coworkers, and you know, would be with him if he was a creep because they wanted sexual favors. A man wants sexual favors, he will find that. They didn't have to come to Epstein for it. Did Blanche immediately follow up and ask who she was referring to as being in the current cabinet. NO. The most obvious question to ask her...but NO ~ HE DOES NOT ASK. And then there is the damning...."They didn't have to come to Epstein for it." Fact is, according to her, they DID come to Epstein, on to his Lolita Island and if they were not there for what was in the Epstein Well, what the hell were CABINET MEMBERS doing there?????????? Blanche wasn't there to conduct a proper investigation or interview. He was there for one reason and one reason only - to find out how compromised Trump is and to convince Maxwell to keep it to herself. That's why she was moved to a different prison. I reckon Blanche made certain promises to her in exchange for her silence. 100%

Absolutely, and I wish more media and Republicans would call out this breathtaking conflict of interest whereby Blanche is Trump's former personal attorney and he is sent to talk to Maxwell who is connected to Epstein and the so-called Epstein files, of which Trump is widely expected to be named in. If this was to be done ethically and professionally, Blanche wouldn't go within miles of Maxwell - no one connected to Trump would. But we all know Trump doesn't play by the rules. It's all part of a clear attempt to hide the truth.

To be honest, I don't think the Epstein files even exist anymore, or if they do, the parts in which Trump is named have been destroyed by those loyal to him. Trump was never going to let them see the light of day. I wouldn't be surprised if the only reason MAGA Mike is refusing to reopen the House and swear in that new Democrat is to keep up the illusion that the files still exist.

https://i.imgflip.com/a12ju2.jpg