Albo tried to slip the tongue in with a pash on the New Zealand Prime Minister Mr Potatohead MK2.
The NZ PM was clearly scared and after the press speech, Albo again tried to make light of the moment that they were now off for a cuddle. Again, the NZ PM was clearly scared.

It's obvious that Albo is a closet poof dumb redneck Houso of the Sydney Houso west. This comes after his visit with fellow Mummy's Boy French president Macron - who married his Mummy.

Biggest slimebag since Howard the coward.

Incompetent - you are under-estimating him .... once you get to know him you'll see he's much worse...

He's a Houso turd of the Sydney West that chases the Lefty Boutique rich poofs of the Melbourne East who call the good Melbournian poor of the West 'boguns' in their gay snobbery.

Anal is now jetsetting around the world visiting as many world leaders as he can to exploit them for photo opportunities and Media enhancement more than any real political effectiveness beyond anti-Trumping. He's basically networking, sucking dicks to make himself look good and running on Democrat whispers in his ear.

He's not a real Politician. He's just a wanker from the Media. You can put his 'Coat' fashion ego right up there with Boy George's Hat gimmick. ::)

Look at the pattern.

Joe Biden. Surrounded by women: Hillary, Pelosi, Dr Jill, Kamala.
All fighting on Joe's behalf.

Now look at Albanese.
ALP full of women
Greens leader, Libs leader, Teals and more: all women.
Only Nationals leader is male.

Albo is surrounded by protective women.
Why?
Because he can't compete with Alpha males. So he needs a non-competitive comfy arena.

He didn't win the election with better politics.
He won it with better Media advertisement upon a bigger spending budget along with blatant bias ABC & SBS. Just like how the Democrats beat Trump to put in dopey Joe. Spending on Media x5 more than Trump. Second time around, no amount of money could have hidden the fact of their incompetence.

Albo is that Govt Public school kid that hid under the dress of his female teacher when the boys from the All boys Catholic/Private school came out to play.

Jasin wrote on Aug 10^th, 2025 at 12:32am:

Look at the pattern. Joe Biden. Surrounded by women: Hillary, Pelosi, Dr Jill, Kamala. All fighting on Joe's behalf. Now look at Albanese. ALP full of women Greens leader, Libs leader, Teals and more: all women. Only Nationals leader is male. Albo is surrounded by protective women. Why? Because he can't compete with Alpha males. So he needs a non-competitive comfy arena. He didn't win the election with better politics. He won it with better Media advertisement upon a bigger spending budget along with blatant bias ABC & SBS. Just like how the Democrats beat Trump to put in dopey Joe. Spending on Media x5 more than Trump. Second time around, no amount of money could have hidden the fact of their incompetence. Albo is that Govt Public school kid that hid under the dress of his female teacher when the boys from the All boys Catholic/Private school came out to play.

Hate to tell you this but Albo was never a Houso.

That's just a false picture he's painted of his upbringing for the sympathy vote that he's been raised by a single mother in govt housing & done it tough so he fits in to the working class scenario.


He may have lived in Govt housing but that was all looked after by his wealthy Grandparents.

He also attended a private school - St. Marys Cathedral College for primary & high school - then the University of Sydney..... all of which was paid for by his grandparents.

you know Albo must be doing well when this is the best criticism the retarded right can come up with :D :D :D

Valkie wrote on Aug 9^th, 2025 at 8:58pm:

Biggest slimebag since Howard the coward.

Why is Howard a coward?

There are very few words in the English language that adequately describe the treachery and lack of moral integrity of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Foreign Minister Penny Wong in their deciding to ‘recognise’ the non-existent state of Palestine. Betrayal? Sabotage? Deception? Disloyalty? Duplicity? Odious? None quite do the decision justice. So how about ‘wreckognition’ – the art of wrecking your own country, its values, its traditions, its loyalties and its alliances in order to appease those opposed to your Western way of life.

Ms Wong, increasingly it would appear, is the real power in this appalling government and her PM increasingly resembles a feeble-minded Renfield who eagerly does her worst bidding. This disgraceful recognition of Palestine was formulated by these two undergraduate socialists after stewing in a toxic brew of Chinese communism, classic hard-left cowardly Marxist appeasement, anti-Americanism, rampant antisemitism, revenge for the failed ‘Voice’ referendum, a desperation for some kind of ‘achievement’ to disguise their totally unimpressive legacy and, perhaps worst of all, a callous disregard for the entire Australian Jewish community, Labor supporters included. And all for what? To facilitate Labor’s tawdry grasping for more Muslim votes as it ramps up immigration to unprecedented levels.

Regardless of what one thinks of Israel, Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu or Palestinian activism, there is one inescapable and horrifying truth: Mr Albanese went ahead with ‘recognising Palestine’ despite head Hamas honcho Ghazi Hamad specifically applauding recognition by Western leaders as the ‘fruits of 7 October’. Let that sink in. This murderous butcher gloated to Al Jazeera that without the butchery, savagery, bloodshed, death and destruction of his horrific pogrom on innocent girls and boys at a music festival, on innocent families getting ready for the day with their kids, and without the ongoing torture of the hostages, no leaders in the West would have dared to take such a step. Yet Mr Albanese did precisely that. On a previous occasion, the same Hamad boasted that there will be October 7s ‘again and again and again’.

Australians need to wake up to the fact that Mr Albanese and Ms Wong are now, to all intents and purposes, aligned ideologically with our enemies ahead of our allies. Together these two have smashed decades of bipartisan Australian foreign policy, with no mandate to do so, spat in the face of not one but two of our most important allies, and knowingly done the bidding of the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians and the most extreme terrorist network in the world. Without batting an eyelid.

Let every jihadist, murderer, rapist, bomb-maker and knife-wielder rest assured in the blackest recesses of their hearts that no matter how appallingly they behave, on current form they have nothing to fear other than mild rebukes from the Albanese government.

There are no excuses. There is literally not one single serious political commentator in Australia or abroad who has put forward the argument that Australia’s (or France’s, or Britain’s, or Canada’s) recognition of Palestine will genuinely advance peace in the Middle East. This is left-wing performative, gesture politics at their most mocking; a callous excuse for the United Nations to ignore all the other wars and horrors around the world and instead devote this year’s entire UN session to lambasting Israel. No doubt this will take the form of calls for sanctions, an arms embargo and so on. Who knows what other treacheries are in store?

President Donald Trump will rightly ignore all this idiocy and, indeed, has shown repeatedly that his ‘peace through strength’ formula has achieved far more in six months than the UN has in six decades.

As a further irony, Mr Albanese’s pathetic woke virtue-signalling was almost certainly the final straw (coming hard on the heels of the disgraceful Sydney Jihadists Bridge March) that drove home the truth to the Israeli government that pandering to weak Western governments only brings more misery whilst delaying the inevitable military showdown. That misery is felt most keenly by, obviously, the hostages, their long-suffering loved ones, and those Gazans who do not support the disgusting actions of their overlords.

The joke is that it was only because of the likes of Ms Wong carping on about ceasefires that Israel was hesitant about finishing off the job months ago. Now those same voices – and many more, including shamefully from the right – are demanding a swift end to the ‘conflict’ because it has ‘dragged on too long’ and it is ‘time to bring it to an end’. Hopefully Israel’s government has come to the conclusion that you listen to these hand-wringing Western armchair generals at your peril.

‘Timing’ is for comedians. Completing the job and annihilating the source of evil is what those who are unjustly attacked are morally obliged to do, no matter how long the job may take.

i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu?

:D :D :D

Frank wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 12:45pm:

There are very few words in the English language that adequately describe the treachery and lack of moral integrity of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Foreign Minister Penny Wong in their deciding to ‘recognise’ the non-existent state of Palestine. Betrayal? Sabotage? Deception? Disloyalty? Duplicity? Odious? None quite do the decision justice. So how about ‘wreckognition’ – the art of wrecking your own country, its values, its traditions, its loyalties and its alliances in order to appease those opposed to your Western way of life. Ms Wong, increasingly it would appear, is the real power in this appalling government and her PM increasingly resembles a feeble-minded Renfield who eagerly does her worst bidding. This disgraceful recognition of Palestine was formulated by these two undergraduate socialists after stewing in a toxic brew of Chinese communism, classic hard-left cowardly Marxist appeasement, anti-Americanism, rampant antisemitism, revenge for the failed ‘Voice’ referendum, a desperation for some kind of ‘achievement’ to disguise their totally unimpressive legacy and, perhaps worst of all, a callous disregard for the entire Australian Jewish community, Labor supporters included. And all for what? To facilitate Labor’s tawdry grasping for more Muslim votes as it ramps up immigration to unprecedented levels. Regardless of what one thinks of Israel, Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu or Palestinian activism, there is one inescapable and horrifying truth: Mr Albanese went ahead with ‘recognising Palestine’ despite head Hamas honcho Ghazi Hamad specifically applauding recognition by Western leaders as the ‘fruits of 7 October’. Let that sink in. This murderous butcher gloated to Al Jazeera that without the butchery, savagery, bloodshed, death and destruction of his horrific pogrom on innocent girls and boys at a music festival, on innocent families getting ready for the day with their kids, and without the ongoing torture of the hostages, no leaders in the West would have dared to take such a step. Yet Mr Albanese did precisely that. On a previous occasion, the same Hamad boasted that there will be October 7s ‘again and again and again’. Australians need to wake up to the fact that Mr Albanese and Ms Wong are now, to all intents and purposes, aligned ideologically with our enemies ahead of our allies. Together these two have smashed decades of bipartisan Australian foreign policy, with no mandate to do so, spat in the face of not one but two of our most important allies, and knowingly done the bidding of the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians and the most extreme terrorist network in the world. Without batting an eyelid. Let every jihadist, murderer, rapist, bomb-maker and knife-wielder rest assured in the blackest recesses of their hearts that no matter how appallingly they behave, on current form they have nothing to fear other than mild rebukes from the Albanese government. There are no excuses. There is literally not one single serious political commentator in Australia or abroad who has put forward the argument that Australia’s (or France’s, or Britain’s, or Canada’s) recognition of Palestine will genuinely advance peace in the Middle East. This is left-wing performative, gesture politics at their most mocking; a callous excuse for the United Nations to ignore all the other wars and horrors around the world and instead devote this year’s entire UN session to lambasting Israel. No doubt this will take the form of calls for sanctions, an arms embargo and so on. Who knows what other treacheries are in store? President Donald Trump will rightly ignore all this idiocy and, indeed, has shown repeatedly that his ‘peace through strength’ formula has achieved far more in six months than the UN has in six decades. As a further irony, Mr Albanese’s pathetic woke virtue-signalling was almost certainly the final straw (coming hard on the heels of the disgraceful Sydney Jihadists Bridge March) that drove home the truth to the Israeli government that pandering to weak Western governments only brings more misery whilst delaying the inevitable military showdown. That misery is felt most keenly by, obviously, the hostages, their long-suffering loved ones, and those Gazans who do not support the disgusting actions of their overlords. The joke is that it was only because of the likes of Ms Wong carping on about ceasefires that Israel was hesitant about finishing off the job months ago. Now those same voices – and many more, including shamefully from the right – are demanding a swift end to the ‘conflict’ because it has ‘dragged on too long’ and it is ‘time to bring it to an end’. Hopefully Israel’s government has come to the conclusion that you listen to these hand-wringing Western armchair generals at your peril. ‘Timing’ is for comedians. Completing the job and annihilating the source of evil is what those who are unjustly attacked are morally obliged to do, no matter how long the job may take.

Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 1:20pm:

i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D

It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 1:58pm:

Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

And how is THAT relevant, impaired nappy-shitter?

Frank wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 2:25pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::) And how is THAT relevant, impaired nappy-shitter?

As relevant as your editorial, Soren.  What shame that it was full of bullshit.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 2:53pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:25pm: Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::) And how is THAT relevant, impaired nappy-shitter? As relevant as your editorial, Soren.  What shame that it was full of bullshit.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Few say it better than Douglas Murray


https://x.com/CherylWroteIt/status/1955215283779518825

Frank wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 4:48pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:53pm: Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:25pm: Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:58pm: Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::) And how is THAT relevant, impaired nappy-shitter? As relevant as your editorial, Soren.  What shame that it was full of bullshit.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::) Few say it worse than, Soren.  You really are a silly Totalitarian who demands that unless we obey your commands we are supporting the opposition.  We aren't.  We are critical of Netanyahu because he is intent do killing innocent Palestinians. You seem to condemn all Palestinians for being Palestinians.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::) Few say it better than Douglas Murray https://x.com/CherylWroteIt/status/1955215283779518825

Frank wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 2:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor.

i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you?

John Smith wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 5:37pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:23pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor. i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you?

Editorials are written without a byline because everyone, even a dim 12 year old,  knows (but not you, of course, thicko as mince-o) that they are written by the editor or someone on the editorial board and they express the publication's, not a particular person's stance on the subject.

Go sweep up.

Absolutely humiliating the 'coalition" , they haven't changed a bit and still on wrong side of Ledger,  albo isn't about 7 terms in front of idiots on reading the room  ;D

The jews own the liberal party and the general Aussie dam despises the jews , and thats a fact

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 3:49pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 5:37pm: Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:23pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor. i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you? Editorials are written without a byline because everyone, even a dim 12 year old,  knows (but not you, of course, thicko as mince-o) that they are written by the editor or someone on the editorial board and they express the publication's, not a particular person's stance on the subject. Go sweep up.

you can make up all the excuses for it that you like. No amount of tears from you changes the fact that the person hasn't put their name to it.  :D

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 7:25pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 3:49pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 5:37pm: Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:23pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor. i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you? Editorials are written without a byline because everyone, even a dim 12 year old,  knows (but not you, of course, thicko as mince-o) that they are written by the editor or someone on the editorial board and they express the publication's, not a particular person's stance on the subject. Go sweep up. you can make up all the excuses for it that you like. No amount of tears from you changes the fact that the person hasn't put their name to it.  :D

No editorials are carrying a byline, illitrate little concreter.

I didnt make you an ignorant *uckwit, it's all your own effort.

LNP never again wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 6:55pm:

The jews own the liberal party and the general Aussie dam despises the jews , and thats a fact

;D     ;D      ;D      ;D   I take it you don't like Jews.... what a hoot.... if you said that out loud in Tel Aviv nothing would happen to you ... in Gaza you'd be chopped for saying you don't like Hamas or Islam....

Big old mind rat got your head, mistah?

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 8:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 7:25pm: Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 3:49pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 5:37pm: Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:23pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor. i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you? Editorials are written without a byline because everyone, even a dim 12 year old,  knows (but not you, of course, thicko as mince-o) that they are written by the editor or someone on the editorial board and they express the publication's, not a particular person's stance on the subject. Go sweep up. you can make up all the excuses for it that you like. No amount of tears from you changes the fact that the person hasn't put their name to it.  :D No editorials are carrying a byline, illitrate little concreter.

so it could have been written by netanyahu after all and you'd never know :D

John Smith wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 9:23pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 8:44pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 7:25pm: Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 3:49pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 5:37pm: Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 2:23pm: John Smith wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 1:20pm: i find it funny that the writer of that article doesn't put his name to it. Was it written by netanyahu? :D :D :D It is an editorial, thick as mud hick, it was written by the editor. i didn't see the editors name anywhere ... did you? Editorials are written without a byline because everyone, even a dim 12 year old,  knows (but not you, of course, thicko as mince-o) that they are written by the editor or someone on the editorial board and they express the publication's, not a particular person's stance on the subject. Go sweep up. you can make up all the excuses for it that you like. No amount of tears from you changes the fact that the person hasn't put their name to it.  :D No editorials are carrying a byline, illitrate little concreter. so it could have been written by netanyahu after all and you'd never know :D

He is not the editor, eyewateringly stupid mong.

You don't understand what an 'editor' or 'publisher' is, do you, moron?
No.

I really don’t have anything to add, I just finished work and a little frizzled.

I do want to note our quality of insults has improved dramatically and this is a classic that has me giggling -

“ He is not the editor, eyewateringly stupid mong.”


It’s a great to see we have finally evolved past saying someone is gay is insulting..



No one wants to be a “eyewateringly stupid mong.“

I needed a giggle after my shift

Thank you for the humour  8-)

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1273850683662194

Frank wrote on Aug 16^th, 2025 at 9:35pm:

He is not the editor, eyewateringly stupid mong. You don't understand what an 'editor' or 'publisher' is, do you, moron? No.

but he, or one of his lackeys, could be on the board and you'd never know because there IS NO NAME ON IT  :D :D :D

John Smith wrote on Aug 17^th, 2025 at 6:24pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 16th, 2025 at 9:35pm: He is not the editor, eyewateringly stupid mong. You don't understand what an 'editor' or 'publisher' is, do you, moron? No. but he, or one of his lackeys, could be on the board and you'd never know because there IS NO NAME ON IT  :D :D :D

Thank you, moron. As you were.
An editorial is the view of the publication, moron. No editorial anywhere has a byline for that very reason.  Caĺling you a moron is to overestimate you. It elevates you above your station. 

Go sweep up, imbecile, and don't break anything.

Brian Ross wrote on Aug 14^th, 2025 at 1:58pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2025 at 12:45pm: There are very few words in the English language that adequately describe the treachery and lack of moral integrity of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his Foreign Minister Penny Wong in their deciding to ‘recognise’ the non-existent state of Palestine. Betrayal? Sabotage? Deception? Disloyalty? Duplicity? Odious? None quite do the decision justice. So how about ‘wreckognition’ – the art of wrecking your own country, its values, its traditions, its loyalties and its alliances in order to appease those opposed to your Western way of life. Ms Wong, increasingly it would appear, is the real power in this appalling government and her PM increasingly resembles a feeble-minded Renfield who eagerly does her worst bidding. This disgraceful recognition of Palestine was formulated by these two undergraduate socialists after stewing in a toxic brew of Chinese communism, classic hard-left cowardly Marxist appeasement, anti-Americanism, rampant antisemitism, revenge for the failed ‘Voice’ referendum, a desperation for some kind of ‘achievement’ to disguise their totally unimpressive legacy and, perhaps worst of all, a callous disregard for the entire Australian Jewish community, Labor supporters included. And all for what? To facilitate Labor’s tawdry grasping for more Muslim votes as it ramps up immigration to unprecedented levels. Regardless of what one thinks of Israel, Gaza, Benjamin Netanyahu or Palestinian activism, there is one inescapable and horrifying truth: Mr Albanese went ahead with ‘recognising Palestine’ despite head Hamas honcho Ghazi Hamad specifically applauding recognition by Western leaders as the ‘fruits of 7 October’. Let that sink in. This murderous butcher gloated to Al Jazeera that without the butchery, savagery, bloodshed, death and destruction of his horrific pogrom on innocent girls and boys at a music festival, on innocent families getting ready for the day with their kids, and without the ongoing torture of the hostages, no leaders in the West would have dared to take such a step. Yet Mr Albanese did precisely that. On a previous occasion, the same Hamad boasted that there will be October 7s ‘again and again and again’. Australians need to wake up to the fact that Mr Albanese and Ms Wong are now, to all intents and purposes, aligned ideologically with our enemies ahead of our allies. Together these two have smashed decades of bipartisan Australian foreign policy, with no mandate to do so, spat in the face of not one but two of our most important allies, and knowingly done the bidding of the Chinese, the Russians, the Iranians and the most extreme terrorist network in the world. Without batting an eyelid. Let every jihadist, murderer, rapist, bomb-maker and knife-wielder rest assured in the blackest recesses of their hearts that no matter how appallingly they behave, on current form they have nothing to fear other than mild rebukes from the Albanese government. There are no excuses. There is literally not one single serious political commentator in Australia or abroad who has put forward the argument that Australia’s (or France’s, or Britain’s, or Canada’s) recognition of Palestine will genuinely advance peace in the Middle East. This is left-wing performative, gesture politics at their most mocking; a callous excuse for the United Nations to ignore all the other wars and horrors around the world and instead devote this year’s entire UN session to lambasting Israel. No doubt this will take the form of calls for sanctions, an arms embargo and so on. Who knows what other treacheries are in store? President Donald Trump will rightly ignore all this idiocy and, indeed, has shown repeatedly that his ‘peace through strength’ formula has achieved far more in six months than the UN has in six decades. As a further irony, Mr Albanese’s pathetic woke virtue-signalling was almost certainly the final straw (coming hard on the heels of the disgraceful Sydney Jihadists Bridge March) that drove home the truth to the Israeli government that pandering to weak Western governments only brings more misery whilst delaying the inevitable military showdown. That misery is felt most keenly by, obviously, the hostages, their long-suffering loved ones, and those Gazans who do not support the disgusting actions of their overlords. The joke is that it was only because of the likes of Ms Wong carping on about ceasefires that Israel was hesitant about finishing off the job months ago. Now those same voices – and many more, including shamefully from the right – are demanding a swift end to the ‘conflict’ because it has ‘dragged on too long’ and it is ‘time to bring it to an end’. Hopefully Israel’s government has come to the conclusion that you listen to these hand-wringing Western armchair generals at your peril. ‘Timing’ is for comedians. Completing the job and annihilating the source of evil is what those who are unjustly attacked are morally obliged to do, no matter how long the job may take. Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Moron Zone. Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)