Why can't those on the right answer these very simple questions with a very simple 'yes' or 'no'?

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Was it rape, as found by the judge, based on New York legislation? Don't try to change the subject.  It has been your mantra that it was rape. ;)

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

Was it rape, ...

It's not the subject of this thread.

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Being the subject of this thread is of no import. Just answer the question. ;)

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Being the subject of this thread is of no import. Just answer the question. ;)

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Being the subject of this thread is of no import.

And yet you can't resist posting replies.

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Why can't Peccary admit he is wrong and backing a corruption that only proves itself by failure ❓

Peccary is backing France over Great Britain as the next contender for TRUE Politics.  ;)

Jasin wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:11pm:

Why can't Peccary admit he is wrong ...

Wrong?

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Are you saying the answer to both of those questions in 'no'?

Gweggy , if you are having trouble with erectile dysfunction, try Viagra.
Fantasizing about Trump and his family to achieve turgor is very low status

aquascoot wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:12pm:

Gweggy , if you are having trouble with erectile dysfunction, try Viagra. Fantasizing about Trump and his family to achieve turgor is very low status

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Your questions are default.

YOU HAVE NO CARDS. 😆🤣😂

Jasin wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:14pm:

Your questions are default. YOU HAVE NO CARDS. 😆🤣😂

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

YOU HAVE NO CARDS 😆🤣😂

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:10pm:

And yet you can't resist posting replies.

Yes and you can't help starting new threads, when the questions become too difficult for you. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

White flags accepted.

Whatever forum WANKER ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

White flags accepted.

You are such a tosser. Why not start a thread on that? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:24pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 4:21pm: White flags accepted. You are such a tosser. Why not start a thread on that? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Don't want to answer the question, is it?

Why is that, Lee?

What's the matter, cat got your tongue?

There you go Pecker. The Sex Tourist has come to console you.
Those of whom you relate to, eh? ;)

Hi JaSin. You just posted that in the other thread.

Do you have an opinion on the matter? We're all waiting for your response.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:35pm:

Don't want to answer the question, is it?

I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. He is trying to reinvent the wheel. He was all for it to be rape, and now he is backpedalling. Now he infers it wasn't rape, but forced digital sex. He can't have it both ways. But maybe he likes it like that way. ;)

You?

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 5:05pm:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 4:35pm: Don't want to answer the question, is it? I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation.

Wrong question.

These are the questions:

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Lol    ;D

Just last week, E. Jean Carroll beat Trump in his appeal of the $5 million jury award in one of her defamation cases. Now, Ms. Carroll just won another victory in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals in her $83.3 million defamation  case against Trump. Specifically, the court rejected AG Bondi and the DOJ's attempt to get Trump out of the case and insert the DOJ into the case as the defendant.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rApGOJqvKTw

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 5:05pm:

I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation.

And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 5:20pm:

lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 4:35pm: Don't want to answer the question, is it? I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. Wrong question. These are the questions: 1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers? 2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

Lee?

John Smith wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 5:49pm:

lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then?

Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 5:20pm:

Wrong question.

Poor petal. So now it seems it wasn't rape. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 6:26pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:20pm: Wrong question. Poor petal. So now it seems it wasn't rape. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

What was it?

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 6:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:49pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then? Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;)

There you go, Greggery. Lee doesn't do legal judgements.

Sounds like all that high moral sanctimony about leftist criminals was just for fun, no?

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 6:25pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:49pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then? Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;)

that you're so quick to defend rapists already tells me you are immoral.

lee wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

........It has been your mantra that it was rape......

..

https://i.vgy.me/uX5TqM.gif

But to his dismay, she was so old....too old for him. But, then again, Gweggy does have a wildly vivid imagination when he closes his eyes.......intensely concentrates, &...&....& snapp....groggy blind-bliss!!


..

Onya Panther 😆

Peccary truly is 'flogging' a dead horse with this and Karnal & Smith are lending him a hand.

Panther wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 9:32pm:

lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 4:08pm: ........It has been your mantra that it was rape...... .. https://i.vgy.me/uX5TqM.gif But to his dismay, she was so old....too old for him. But, then again, Gweggy does have a wildly vivid imagination when he closes his eyes.......intensely concentrates, &...&....& snapp....groggy blind-bliss!! ..

Sorry, Panther, do you now oppose jury verdicts under your much-loved Constitution?

We thought it would come to this. First it was the prosecution of crimes, then it was the law of torts, now it's the process of trial by jury. Next you'll condemn the rule of law altogether.

Look, why don't you just come out and say it?

You never really cared for your Constitution at all. The only reason you brought it up was so you could defend school shootings.

If gweg read EJeans book. He would know she had mixed emotions over trumps actions.

She found it erotic was the word she used.

Still after 25 years of reflection,  she was of the opinion this was a Me Too moment.

Trump is a bold action taker .

He is nothing like a timid incel from Perth whose sex life exists by fantasising and LYING about Trump.

Greggy claims and his leftie mates sniggered at this statement by gweg


" I have known several men who have slept with the Slovenian who're.
They said her pussy smelt like  a tuna that had been out on the sun for a week"

No condemnation from his leftie mates.
They are fine with a woman being attacked on line with an obvious lie. 

But do carry on with your circle jerk, leftie incels  :-[

[quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/33#33 date=1750451593]If gweg read EJeans book. He would know she had mixed emotions over trumps actions.

She found it erotic was the word she used.

Still after 25 years of reflection,  she was of the opinion this was a Me Too moment.

Trump is a bold action taker .

He is nothing like a timid incel from Perth whose sex life exists by fantasising and LYING about Trump.

Greggy claims and his leftie mates sniggered at this statement by gweg


" I have known several men who have slept with the Slovenian who're.
They said her pussy smelt like  a tuna that had been out on the sun for a week"

No condemnation from his leftie mates.
They are fine with a woman being attacked on line with an obvious lie. 

But do carry on with your circle jerk, leftie incels  :-[/quote]

Oh? And where did she use that word?

[quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/33#33 date=1750451593]If gweg read EJeans book. He would know she had mixed emotions over trumps actions.

She found it erotic was the word she used.

Still after 25 years of reflection,  she was of the opinion this was a Me Too moment.

Trump is a bold action taker .

He is nothing like a timid incel from Perth whose sex life exists by fantasising and LYING about Trump.

Greggy claims and his leftie mates sniggered at this statement by gweg


" I have known several men who have slept with the Slovenian who're.
They said her pussy smelt like  a tuna that had been out on the sun for a week"

No condemnation from his leftie mates.
They are fine with a woman being attacked on line with an obvious lie. 

But do carry on with your circle jerk, leftie incels  :-[/quote]

Incorrect. It was more like an ashtray that had been left out in the rain.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:40am:

[quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/33#33 date=1750451593]If gweg read EJeans book. He would know she had mixed emotions over trumps actions. She found it erotic was the word she used. Still after 25 years of reflection,  she was of the opinion this was a Me Too moment. Trump is a bold action taker . He is nothing like a timid incel from Perth whose sex life exists by fantasising and LYING about Trump. Greggy claims and his leftie mates sniggered at this statement by gweg " I have known several men who have slept with the Slovenian who're. They said her pussy smelt like  a tuna that had been out on the sun for a week" No condemnation from his leftie mates. They are fine with a woman being attacked on line with an obvious lie.  But do carry on with your circle jerk, leftie incels  :-[/quote] Incorrect. It was more like an ashtray that had been left out in the rain.

Charming   ::)

The left are so respectful of women.
They should learn to copy Donald and be a gentleman

They virtue signal on a woman being raped, then call the First Lady a whore.

It's a good thing freediver's connections take the time to sort the real comments here from the dross... and the security services as well.

Jasin wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:59am:

They virtue signal on a woman being raped, then call the First Lady a whore.

The left are very messed up .
As you can see calling a woman a who're and commenting on her vaginal odour is a source of amusement to them.

Even worse is the leftie women are OK with this


Is it any wonder that current trends show young leftie women actually want to date conservative men .

I think it's a smart move

How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:09am:

Jasin wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 7:59am: They virtue signal on a woman being raped, then call the First Lady a whore. The left are very messed up . As you can see calling a woman a who're and commenting on her vaginal odour is a source of amusement to them. Even worse is the leftie women are OK with this Is it any wonder that current trends show young leftie women actually want to date conservative men . I think it's a smart move

The Left are Terrorists.

Try watching Hegseth when he’s before a congressional hearing. You could probably count on one hand the number of times he’s actually answered the question posed to him without giving an unrelated answer or just plain lying. There really needs to be consequences for this type of behaviour. Otherwise, what’s the point of having these hearings if morons like him and Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard are able to lie and obfuscate their way through these hearings? There needs to be a mechanism to compel truthful answers and consequences for when that does not happen.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:25am:

How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others.

Really ?
Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden?

No ?

Perhaps because their isn't one.

Back to your circle jerk. :-[

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:25am:

How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others.

Indeed.

Such precious little snowflakes.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:55am:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 7:40am: [quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/33#33 date=1750451593]If gweg read EJeans book. He would know she had mixed emotions over trumps actions. She found it erotic was the word she used. Still after 25 years of reflection,  she was of the opinion this was a Me Too moment. Trump is a bold action taker . He is nothing like a timid incel from Perth whose sex life exists by fantasising and LYING about Trump. Greggy claims and his leftie mates sniggered at this statement by gweg " I have known several men who have slept with the Slovenian who're. They said her pussy smelt like  a tuna that had been out on the sun for a week" No condemnation from his leftie mates. They are fine with a woman being attacked on line with an obvious lie.  But do carry on with your circle jerk, leftie incels  :-[/quote] Incorrect. It was more like an ashtray that had been left out in the rain. Charming   ::) The left are so respectful of women. They should learn to copy Donald and be a gentleman

Do you know what you are, dear?

You're virtuous. We mean this in the nicest possible way, no?

You and Melania would get on well. Her secret?

She douches with apple cider vinegar.

You?

I asked chat gpt for help.

Please read



1. Feels dehumanizing

She senses that he’s not seeing her as a whole person — with thoughts, boundaries, and dignity — but as a collection of body parts or a tool for his own sexual gratification.


2. Involves unwelcome sexual attention

Sexual energy or attention not invited or reciprocated often feels intrusive, especially in public or professional settings.

Example: long stares at her chest, licking lips, following her movements, or making lewd comments.


3. Disregards context or consent

There’s a difference between flirting and being creepy. Flirting usually involves social calibration — reading cues, showing respect, and gauging interest.

Being creepy ignores those cues. It’s one-sided, with no concern for how she feels.


4. Triggers discomfort or even fear

A man who treats a woman like an object, especially in an entitled or aggressive way, can come off as a potential threat, even if he doesn’t mean to be.

Women are socially conditioned to be cautious, and past experiences or stories make them alert to signs of potential harm.



---

How to Avoid Coming Off as “Creepy”:

See the person first, not just the body.

Check your intent: Are you admiring or objectifying?

Read social cues: Does she seem comfortable, responsive, or closed off?

Be self-aware: Are your actions respectful and appropriate to the context?

Think mutuality, not just desire.



---

In Short:

Creepy is often shorthand for:
👉 “He’s making me feel like I’m not safe or respected — just looked at, not seen.”

Would you like examples of how this plays out in real life or dating situations?

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:25am:

How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others.

As long as convince yourself Proudroo.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:16am:

I asked chat gpt for help. Please read 1. Feels dehumanizing She senses that he’s not seeing her as a whole person — with thoughts, boundaries, and dignity — but as a collection of body parts or a tool for his own sexual gratification. 2. Involves unwelcome sexual attention Sexual energy or attention not invited or reciprocated often feels intrusive, especially in public or professional settings. Example: long stares at her chest, licking lips, following her movements, or making lewd comments. 3. Disregards context or consent There’s a difference between flirting and being creepy. Flirting usually involves social calibration — reading cues, showing respect, and gauging interest. Being creepy ignores those cues. It’s one-sided, with no concern for how she feels. 4. Triggers discomfort or even fear A man who treats a woman like an object, especially in an entitled or aggressive way, can come off as a potential threat, even if he doesn’t mean to be. Women are socially conditioned to be cautious, and past experiences or stories make them alert to signs of potential harm. --- How to Avoid Coming Off as “Creepy”: See the person first, not just the body. Check your intent: Are you admiring or objectifying? Read social cues: Does she seem comfortable, responsive, or closed off? Be self-aware: Are your actions respectful and appropriate to the context? Think mutuality, not just desire. --- In Short: Creepy is often shorthand for: 👉 “He’s making me feel like I’m not safe or respected — just looked at, not seen.” Would you like examples of how this plays out in real life or dating situations?

Now I know the reason (well, one of them) why I don't use something like ChatGPT.

It generates worse word salads than you do.

And, up until now I never thought that was possible.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:16am:

I asked chat gpt for help.

I see a lot more people just copying and pasting stuff from chatgpt that they've asked it to say, as if that's real these days on here...

Edit: I'm not saying that's what you're doing scoot.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 9:31am:

[quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others.

Really ?
Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden?

No ?

Perhaps because their isn't one.

Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote]

So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it?

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:37am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:16am: I asked chat gpt for help. I see a lot more people just copying and pasting stuff from chatgpt that they've asked it to say, as if that's real these days on here... Edit: I'm not saying that's what you're doing scoot.

You must send a lot of time on chatgpt....

How do you know how this 'you lot' treat others?  What point do you imagine you are trying to make?

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:16am:

I asked chat gpt for help.

why not just read what it said on your court order?

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:46am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:31am: [quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it?

Care to tell us about Trump and Jan 6.


I'm fairly sure the entire left said.

" If someone is not condemning, they are supporting  :-[

Armchair_Politician wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 9:18am:

Try watching Hegseth when he’s before a congressional hearing. You could probably count on one hand the number of times he’s actually answered the question posed to him without giving an unrelated answer or just plain lying. There really needs to be consequences for this type of behaviour. Otherwise, what’s the point of having these hearings if morons like him and Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard are able to lie and obfuscate their way through these hearings? There needs to be a mechanism to compel truthful answers and consequences for when that does not happen.

I suppose the Right could just refuse to answer questions to the Press or just walk off like the Democrats did. Hell, even Biden couldn't be asked the 'hard questions' beyond just plain dementia incoherence.
Same with Albo and Wong of whom you could see sweat and gulp at the hard questions from overseas. Unlike here where they comfortable have the Media ask them the easy questions or they just walk away.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 12:47pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:46am: [quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/43#43 date=1750462273][quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it?

Care to tell us about Trump and Jan 6.


I'm fairly sure the entire left said.

" If someone is not condemning, they are supporting  :-[/quote]

Yeah, I'm asking if you're now setting that as your expectations for the forum.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 9:32am:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 8:25am: How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Indeed. Such precious little snowflakes.

And take Peccary here. Can't and won't answer the hard questions put to him. He just deflects, changes subject or blathers about a Rape that never existed but in the minds of Trollish little pinks like him.

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:46am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:31am: [quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it?

Speaking as a woman, i'm magnitudes more offended by Trump saying that he can grab any woman he likes by the pussy. Not to mention all of the other things he says and done.

Horseboy thinks they're the way of the superior man however, and haas spnt years glorifying them on here.

Jasin wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 1:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:32am: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 8:25am: How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Indeed. Such precious little snowflakes. And take Peccary here. Can't and won't answer the hard questions put to him. He just deflects, changes subject or blathers about a Rape that never existed but in the minds of Trollish little pinks strokers like him.

https://i.vgy.me/uX5TqM.gif

Gweggy is just wishing she was much, much younger.....it enhances the snap in his carrot!

..

Ha!  ;D

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 1:36pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:46am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:31am: [quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it? Speaking as a woman, i'm magnitudes more offended by Trump saying that he can grab any woman he likes by the pussy. Not to mention all of the other things he says and done. Horseboy thinks they're the way of the superior man however, and has spent years glorifying them on here.

Indeed he has, along with Bobby and a few others.

Trump was just trying to be a Star like Pecker, when in that industry.
Politics is a different game. Something you Lefties can't understand.

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 1:36pm:

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:46am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:31am: [quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it? Speaking as a woman, i'm magnitudes more offended by Trump saying that he can grab any woman he likes by the pussy. Not to mention all of the other things he says and done. Horseboy thinks they're the way of the superior man however, and haas spnt years glorifying them on here.

George Orwell called this doublespeak

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 1:30pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 12:47pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:46am: [quote author=aquascoot link=1750398843/43#43 date=1750462273][quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it? Care to tell us about Trump and Jan 6. I'm fairly sure the entire left said. " If someone is not condemning, they are supporting  :-[/quote] Yeah, I'm asking if you're now setting that as your expectations for the forum.

Sure, you ask me what I think of any of franks , Gordon's, Boris, Leroy and everyone else and I'll give you an honest appraisal.


Now , care to comment on Greg's photoshopped picture of Tulsi gabbard.
Ok to do that to women, mothers, wives ?

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 3:15pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 1:36pm: SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 10:46am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 9:31am: [quote author=sadkangaroo link=1750398843/40#40 date=1750458339]How quick you are to shed tears when people treat you how you lot treat others. Really ? Care to find a quote where anyone from the right commented on the odour of karmala harris's vagina or Jill Biden? No ? Perhaps because their isn't one. Back to your circle jerk. :-[/quote] So you're saying, at least on this forum, if someone doesn't condemn a comment, they support it? Speaking as a woman, i'm magnitudes more offended by Trump saying that he can grab any woman he likes by the pussy. Not to mention all of the other things he says and done. Horseboy thinks they're the way of the superior man however, and haas spnt years glorifying them on here. George Orwell called this doublespeak

No he didn't. Don't pretend you've read the book.

There is absolutely nothing even remotely ambiguous in what i said.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 3:18pm:

Now , care to comment on Greg's photoshopped picture of Tulsi gabbard. Ok to do that to women, mothers, wives ?

Okay to grab us by the pussy? Say we're too ugly to rape? Cheat on us with prostitutes?

Walk in on our daughters while they are changing?

Does anybody know how many times Trump has been accused of rape?

Oh look:

Since the 1970s, at least 25 women have publicly accused Donald Trump of rape, kissing and groping without consent; looking under women's skirts, and walking in on naked teenage pageant contestants


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator.
If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 3:42pm:

Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves

And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule.

Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it.

I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is.

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 3:45pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is.

Incorrect

It's not that women MUST submit
It's that they want to.

Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever.
And swap them out when they reach 25.
He stated it to "establish the frame"
Good behaviour?
Not your place to judge.
They are lining up down the street to be the next.

Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates?

No, he is a superior man
So is Trump

Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though

Disgraceful stuff
Evil in fact

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 3:29pm:

Oh look: Since the 1970s, at least 25 women have publicly accused Donald Trump of rape, kissing and groping without consent; looking under women's skirts, and walking in on naked teenage pageant contestants https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations

And those on here who defend him say that every single woman (and child) who has accused him of rape is lying.

Despite the fact that Trump is an adjudicated rapist - found liable for sexual abuse in a court of law by a jury of his peers - who has admitted to sexually assaulting women, along with the fact that he's a pathological liar, it's the alleged victims who are lying according to Trump's defenders.

Sick stuff.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:10pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact

At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me.

In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological.

Fallacy: Trump in Gaol for Rape.
Reality: Trump is President.

The American Tribe has spoken.
Suck it up losers of lies.

Until you condemn the sorts of thing you're having a sook about from Greggy that have come from you side Scoot, even just on these forums, you can take your pearl clutching and shove it up you're arse.

The left should not be expected to live up to a standard you won't even try for.

Your sooking about Rape is about as truthful as Pelosi's attempts to indict Trump. Lies and lies that didn't succeed.
You Lefties are just flogging a dead horse, because that's all you have - failure.

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:18pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological.

The really disturbing thing about these defenders of sexual abuse is that they think what Trump does is perfectly okay because it's not called 'rape'.

Despite this sickening fact ...

"The federal jury implicitly found that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers in the 1990s."

... they still defend him.

Not a single one of them will condemn him for that act of sexual abuse.

Instead, they'll play semantics and try to blame the woman.

These are very sick individuals.

The only SICKO here is YOU wanker.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:35pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:18pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological. The really disturbing thing about these defenders of sexual abuse is that they think what Trump does is perfectly okay because it's not called 'rape'. Despite this sickening fact ... "The federal jury implicitly found that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers in the 1990s." ... they still defend him. Not a single one of them will condemn him for that act of sexual abuse. Instead, they'll play semantics and try to blame the woman. These are very sick individuals.

Is he in the room with you now?.

PER CURIAM:

In this case, after a nine-day trial, a jury found that plaintiff-appellee E. Jean Carroll was sexually abused by defendant-appellant Donald J. Trump at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1996.

The jury also found that Mr. Trump defamed her in statements he made in 2022.

The jury awarded Ms. Carroll a total of $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:18pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2025 at 5:48pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:42pm: Bobby. wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:33pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:32pm: Quote: Al-Qaeda wants to kill Trump: So do many maga nutters :D There's a certain Slovenian hooker who's first in line. You wouldn't say that to Trump's face - you'd get a bunch of fives.   :o you think trump would pay Greg to screw his wife? I doubt it. I have actually spoken to men who have screwed her back in Slovenia. From what they tell me, there's not enough money in the world that would convince me to get anywhere near that whore. Let's just say that the tuna taco smells like it was left out in the sun for a week or two.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:35pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:18pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological. The really disturbing thing about these defenders of sexual abuse is that they think what Trump does is perfectly okay because it's not called 'rape'. Despite this sickening fact ... "The federal jury implicitly found that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers in the 1990s." ... they still defend him. Not a single one of them will condemn him for that act of sexual abuse. Instead, they'll play semantics and try to blame the woman. These are very sick individuals.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11^th, 2025 at 5:48pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:42pm: Bobby. wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:34pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:33pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 11th, 2025 at 5:32pm: Quote: Al-Qaeda wants to kill Trump: So do many maga nutters :D There's a certain Slovenian hooker who's first in line. You wouldn't say that to Trump's face - you'd get a bunch of fives.   :o you think trump would pay Greg to screw his wife? I doubt it. I have actually spoken to men who have screwed her back in Slovenia. From what they tell me, there's not enough money in the world that would convince me to get anywhere near that whore. Let's just say that the tuna taco smells like it was left out in the sun for a week or two.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:55pm:

PER CURIAM: In this case, after a nine-day trial, a jury found that plaintiff-appellee E. Jean Carroll was sexually abused by defendant-appellant Donald J. Trump at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1996. The jury also found that Mr. Trump defamed her in statements he made in 2022. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll a total of $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages.

Thank you. not rape. Now all you have to do is admit it. Not by inference but pubklic acknowledgement.  ::)

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 5:37pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:55pm: PER CURIAM: In this case, after a nine-day trial, a jury found that plaintiff-appellee E. Jean Carroll was sexually abused by defendant-appellant Donald J. Trump at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in Manhattan in 1996. The jury also found that Mr. Trump defamed her in statements he made in 2022. The jury awarded Ms. Carroll a total of $5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Thank you. not rape. Now all you have to do is admit it. Not by inference but pubklic acknowledgement.  ::)

The jury found that he sexually abused a woman.

Why can't you condemn him for that assault?

Why is rape bad but sexual abuse okay?

If it's not, say so - condemn him for his disgusting act.

John Smith wrote on Jun 20^th, 2025 at 8:13pm:

lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 6:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:49pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then? Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;) that you're so quick to defend rapists already tells me you are immoral.

Poor Guido. Can't tell non-judgement from defence of someone.

guido, gweggy and karny -The happy Bankwest (Spoonerism alert) triumvirate of circle jerks. ;D

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 5:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 8:13pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 6:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:49pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then? Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;) that you're so quick to defend rapists already tells me you are immoral. Poor Guido. Can't tell non-judgement from defence of someone. guido, gweggy and karny -The happy Bankwest (Spoonerism alert) triumvirate of circle jerks. ;D

The jury found that Trump sexually abused a woman.

Why can't you condemn him for that assault?

Or, is sexual abuse okay with you?

If it's not, say so - condemn him for his disgusting act.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 5:49pm:

The jury found that Trump sexually abused a woman.

They found him guilty of battery. Now are you officially walking back from your rape claim?


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 5:49pm:

Why can't you condemn him for that assault? Or, is sexual abuse okay with you?

He was found guilty of assault and battery. But not rape, which has long been you claim.

And battery is not ok.

What do you think of a judge that doesn't even know his own state's laws?

Perhaps he got his Letters whilst serving as a night soil specialist, because he obviously wasn't top of his class.

Perhaps he had merely "paid his dues" to the Democrat hierarchy.  ;) /sarc off

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 5:49pm: The jury found that Trump sexually abused a woman. Yes they did. ...

I condemn him unconditionally for that cowardly attack.

You?

Do you know if in other jurisdictions, if what Trump did would qualify as rape?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:15pm:

I condemn him unconditionally for that cowardly attack.

Actually I updated my effort. They found him guilty of battery.


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:15pm:

You?

So can't read eh?

"And battery is not ok."

And still no walking back from your rape claims. That makes you one of the vilest sorts. Just can't admit to your "mistakes". ;D ;D ;D ;D

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:20pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: I condemn him unconditionally for that cowardly attack. Actually I updated my effort. They found him guilty of battery. greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: You? So can't read eh? "And battery is not ok." And still no walking back from your rape claims. That makes you one of the vilest sorts. Just can't admit to your "mistakes". ;D ;D ;D ;D

Why would I walk back from my rape claims?

He raped her.

Donald Trump is a rapist.

The definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere.

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.”

Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:28pm:

lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: I condemn him unconditionally for that cowardly attack. Actually I updated my effort. They found him guilty of battery. greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: You? So can't read eh? "And battery is not ok." And still no walking back from your rape claims. That makes you one of the vilest sorts. Just can't admit to your "mistakes". ;D ;D ;D ;D Why would I walk back from my rape claims? He raped her. Donald Trump is a rapist. The definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere. The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.

How do you feel when he is in the room with you?.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:28pm:

Why would I walk back from my rape claims? He raped her.

Not according to the law in the state in which the trial was held. You are such a liar. ;D ;D ;D ;D


greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:28pm:

The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.”

She didn't try to prove rape. The charge was battery. Under the laws in which she made the claim. ::)

Leroy wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:28pm: lee wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:20pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: I condemn him unconditionally for that cowardly attack. Actually I updated my effort. They found him guilty of battery. greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:15pm: You? So can't read eh? "And battery is not ok." And still no walking back from your rape claims. That makes you one of the vilest sorts. Just can't admit to your "mistakes". ;D ;D ;D ;D Why would I walk back from my rape claims? He raped her. Donald Trump is a rapist. The definition of rape in the New York Penal Law is far narrower than the meaning of “rape” in common modern parlance, its definition in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes, and elsewhere. The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that. How do you feel when he is in the room with you ?

https://i.vgy.me/uX5TqM.gif


Gweggy would probably feel so, so, so very cheated because Ms. Carrol was far far too old!!! ......
SNAP goes the carrot!!

..

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:28pm: Why would I walk back from my rape claims? He raped her. Not according to the law in the state in which the trial was held. You are such a liar. ;D ;D ;D ;D )

Would it be rape anywhere else?

Had Trump forcibly penetrated a woman's vagina anywhere in Australia, for example, would that be considered rape, Lee?

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:09pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:28pm: Why would I walk back from my rape claims? He raped her. Not according to the law in the state in which the trial was held. You are such a liar. ;D ;D ;D ;D greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 6:28pm: The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was “raped” within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump “raped” her as many people commonly understand the word “rape.” She didn't try to prove rape. The charge was battery. Under the laws in which she made the claim. ::)

Only because of the statute of limitations.

https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038%20Opinion.pdf

Moreover, he's still a rapist.

I wonder, how many women and girls actually need to come forward before men like these will denounce another man?

25 isn't enough.

How many ... before women and girls are valued enough to be believed?

But sure, get caught up on tuna.

Quote:

Had Trump forcibly penetrated a woman's vagina anywhere in Australia, for example, would that be considered rape, Lee?

No it would not be considered rape in Australia. Australian courts require a high standard of evidence. Trump was convicted in a civil case because which has a far lower standard of evidence than what is required in Australia. So in short he would not have even been charged in Australia.

Leroy wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:44pm:

Quote: Had Trump forcibly penetrated a woman's vagina anywhere in Australia, for example, would that be considered rape, Lee? No it would not be considered rape in Australia. Australian courts require a high standard of evidence. Trump was convicted in a civil case because which has a far lower standard of evidence than what is required in Australia. So in short he would not have even been charged in Australia.

Australian courtss also take character into account.

Regardless, i think you will find that forced penetration of anything at all into any orifice of another is technically rape, here in good old Australia.

The crime itself is valid in Australia, the evidence is not. It has to be proven in Australia. Political bias is not enough factual evidence and does not fly in Australian courts.

The vitriol of Peccary shows that he doesn't give a rat's arse about the accusing woman being raped. Not at all.
She's just an instrument of his hate vendetta against Trump and, in his own words "Whore" First Lady.

You find as much grace and character in Peccary as you would find in a bitter evil Goblin.

Leroy wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:54pm:

The crime itself is valid in Australia, the evidence is not. It has to be proven in Australia. Political bias is not enough factual evidence and does not fly in Australian courts.

And right here iss where you horrible men appall me.

Just because someone isn't found guilty it doesn't erase the rape. The person was still raped.

If someone was to murder your best friend, they're not any less dead if the suspect in the murder trial is let off on a technicality.

Courts are the main reason women don't report sexual assault ... that and the fact they are traumatised and are simply incapable of living in it. But even that you lot hold against us. "Why didn't she report it straight away?" ... "Why didn't she tell ssomebody?".

Just look at yourselves and try to figure it out.

At the end of the day, you either believe the accuser or the accused. And my, there is so much smoke coming out of Trump that he's an inferno.

I'm sure Aquarius, Black Orchid and Sophia here agree with us 'men'.

I think you lost on your post straight away you man hating sexist.

I'm so sorry but an accusation does not make you guilty in Australia.

Leroy wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:12pm:

I'm so sorry but an accusation does not make you guilty in Australia.

Agreed. Obviously. Straw man.

More importantly, an innocent or guilty verdict has no impact on whether or not a person was raped.

Mothra is telling us that it's not all about the topic.
It's all about 'her' and her hatred for us 'men'.
Unlike her 'boys' from the Troll Cave forum.

*

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 8:15pm:

Leroy wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 8:12pm: I'm so sorry but an accusation does not make you guilty in Australia. Agreed. Obviously. Straw man. More importantly, an innocent or guilty verdict has no impact on whether or not a person was raped.

We feed the Lefties here like Israel provides food for the Gazans. ::)

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 4:18pm:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological.

Not at all, Mother. You need to pay attention. You need to understand the path of the Superior Man, he "upon the narrow road to success".

Ladies crave his attention. They love his gropes. They beg to be ravished, even if they are unaware of it. Subconsciously, they long to be pinned to the wall and penetrated by a real man, a "winner".

The leftie chodes are the ones to be condemned. They describe women as handbags, front bottoms, breeders and Barbie dolls. Their depravity knows no bounds. 

Pure evil.

Look, if Donnie wants to party with his babes, he is perfectly entitled to do so. They know who he is. The ladies admire him for it, like all Alpha studs. He gets them wet, a biological sign that they're ready for penetration.

Betas have to use lubrication. Their fat, butt-ugly wives want nothing to do with them. Ladies want to be ravished, even the bush pigs left over for the chodes. As soon as they're asked for consent, they dry up. Excuse me, darling, may I have your permission to stick it in?

Despicable stuff.

9 out of 10 fillies want to be ploughed by a butch Alpha with heaps of cash. The number that said they wanted a beta incel cuck with a limp dick?

0.

You can't argue with evidence like this, Mother, it's scientific.

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:14pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 5:49pm: The jury found that Trump sexually abused a woman. They found him guilty of battery. Now are you officially walking back from your rape claim? greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 5:49pm: Why can't you condemn him for that assault? Or, is sexual abuse okay with you? He was found guilty of assault and battery. But not rape, which has long been you claim. And battery is not ok. What do you think of a judge that doesn't even know his own state's laws? Perhaps he got his Letters whilst serving as a night soil specialist, because he obviously wasn't top of his class. Perhaps he had merely "paid his dues" to the Democrat hierarchy.  ;) /sarc off

Hi Lee, are you saying assault is okay?

Cheers.

I don't think Lee even knows what he's saying. He's simply contrary and smug.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:36pm:

Not at all, Mother. You need to pay attention. You need to understand the path of the Superior Man, he "upon the narrow road to success". Ladies crave his attention. They love his gropes. They beg to be ravished, even if they are unaware of it. Subconsciously, they long to be pinned to the wall and penetrated by a real man, a "winner". The leftie chodes are the ones to be condemned. They describe women as handbags, front bottoms, breeders and Barbie dolls. Their depravity knows no bounds.  Pure evil. Look, if Donnie wants to party with his babes, he is perfectly entitled to do so. They know who he is. The ladies admire him for it, like all Alpha studs. He gets them wet, a biological sign that they're ready for penetration. Betas have to use lubrication. Their fat, butt-ugly wives want nothing to do with them. Ladies want to be ravished, even the bush pigs left over for the chodes. As soon as they're asked for consent, they dry up. Excuse me, darling, may I have your permission to stick it in? Despicable stuff. 9 out of 10 fillies want to be ploughed by a butch Alpha with heaps of cash. The number that said they wanted a beta incel cuck with a limp dick? 0. You can't argue with evidence like this, Mother, it's scientific.

;D ;D ;D

Post of the day! Probably the whole week!

You're a genius, Karnal.

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:36pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:18pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 4:10pm: mothra wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:45pm: aquascoot wrote on Jun 21st, 2025 at 3:42pm: Trump , terrible behaviour, but he can get away with it because he has established the frame of being a dominator. If Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg said or did that, they would be gone, because that's not the frame in which they portray themselves And there we have it. Women must submit to the superior man, according to Horseboy. We're just there as playthings or subject to ridicule. Hard to imagine he's really actually upset by Greg's comment, isn't it. I sense opportunistic virtue signalling. Completely hypocritical, naturally. Horseboy always is. Incorrect It's not that women MUST submit It's that they want to. Leo de caprio has stated he intends to have girlfriends in their early 20s forever. And swap them out when they reach 25. He stated it to "establish the frame" Good behaviour? Not your place to judge. They are lining up down the street to be the next. Did Leo comment on random women's vaginas smelling like 7 day old tuna, ashtrays or that they douche with apple cider vinegar.luke gweg and karmal did followed by sniggering from your leftie male mates? No, he is a superior man So is Trump Weak masturbatory creeps on this forum seem OK to you though Disgraceful stuff Evil in fact At least 25 women accusing Trump of sexual assault doesn't sound like us letting him to me. In fact, not only is it a massive disconnect to suggest such, it it pathological. Not at all, Mother. You need to pay attention. You need to understand the path of the Superior Man, he "upon the narrow road to success". Ladies crave his attention. They love his gropes. They beg to be ravished, even if they are unaware of it. Subconsciously, they long to be pinned to the wall and penetrated by a real man, a "winner". The leftie chodes are the ones to be condemned. They describe women as handbags, front bottoms, breeders and Barbie dolls. Their depravity knows no bounds.  Pure evil. Look, if Donnie wants to party with his babes, he is perfectly entitled to do so. They know who he is. The ladies admire him for it, like all Alpha studs. He gets them wet, a biological sign that they're ready for penetration. Betas have to use lubrication. Their fat, butt-ugly wives want nothing to do with them. Ladies want to be ravished, even the bush pigs left over for the chodes. As soon as they're asked for consent, they dry up. Excuse me, darling, may I have your permission to stick it in? Despicable stuff. 9 out of 10 fillies want to be ploughed by a butch Alpha with heaps of cash. The number that said they wanted a beta incel cuck with a limp dick? 0. You can't argue with evidence like this, Mother, it's scientific.

That's mainly word salad but you also reveal that you don't know much about women and its not surprising you and your leftie cheersquad are incel.

Let's look at the act that Trump performed.
Let's look at the fact he was found guilty of this act.
Let's look at the fact that after being found guilty of this act his vote amongst women went up.

What is going on?

Do women like rapists?
No

So they must have seen it as something other then rape.

Do women remember their teen years, their college years, going to raves and music festivals, do they remember being horny. Did women make 50 shades of grey , a story about an Alpha guy with a chopper who finger banged his secretary , the number 1 movie and book of 2013 with huge audiences of women.
Do women remember ( fondly) their own sexual flings when they were young?
Were  women going out with gweggys and Carl's and karmals or were they at hot parties with hot guys feeling horny .


You reveal your nativity karmal.

The fact women increased their approval for Trump in 2024 over 2016 proves me to be correct.


By the way , you should study the data from tinder.

MOST  young women respond to a very small number of men on tinder and MOST guys get zero dates.

What is going on when this is the number 1 hook up app on the planet.

Women are sharing the few hot guys.
These guys have an unlimited harem and most guys have hand cream.

And by their actions women show they DO want to be with the Alpha guy.

And they don't want some needy little guy who is creepy and will drop flowers off at their work and then their friends will laugh at them.

Women want to be with a winner.

You may think you are a bigger winner then Trump.
Go create a profile on tinder and get back to us.
I am predicting crickets.

If you don't like the way the world is
The fact that women. increased their vote for Trump
That women like a guy who takes control
That they don't find creepy needy guys attractive
Them go live on another planet because that's how things are on planet earth.

Your pals gweg And mothra are extreme outliers
I have observed what goes on with young women as I had daughters.
One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain.
And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud.

This is normal behaviour  now for young women.
They have more cash. Better jobs and they aren't going to go without sex and they are happy to share rather then be with a loser

Excuse I?

Women were more likely than men to support Vice President Kamala Harris and Governor Tim Walz within and across every race/ethnic, age, and education group reported in the available data.

The fact that the vote turnout was higher in 2024 doesn't mean the fillies are begging to be groped by He, dear.

It just means more breeders cast a vote overall.

Now the price of frocks are going up, they may be having reservations.

The AUD just tanked again due to his tariffs, so we know how they feel.

You?

There are no words ....

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:03am:

That's mainly word salad but you also reveal that you don't know much about women and its not surprising you and your leftie cheersquad are incel.

Classic projection.

Until you show even the faintest shred of integrity by calling out the filth spewed by your own side on this very forum, often far worse, you have no moral high ground to stand on.

Put up or shut up.

I'm sick to death of blowhards like you holding everyone else to standards you've never once applied to yourself or those you align with. If you want to preach, start by cleaning up your own backyard.

The fact that you took his blatantly satirical piss-take of you at face value says it all, utterly devoid of self-awareness, as always.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:03am:

One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain.

Lucky gal. I once feltched a wedded lieutenant colonel, but those were different times.

Just don't ask your daughter for any of her friend's selfies, dear.

It may lower your Alpha status a tad.

mothra wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:47am:

There are no words ....

Oh, there are words, dear.

It helps to blend them up and turn them into a tasty smoothie.

Nutritious and delicious.

Miam miam, no?

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:56am:

mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:47am: There are no words .... Oh, there are words, dear. It helps to blend them up and turn them into a tasty smoothie. Nutritious and delicious. Miam miam, no?

Horseboy reckons he has a wife and a daughter.

That just rips my heart out.

Not only regarding my concerns on their behalf but the evidencing of his absolute failure to get to know other humans around him in close capacity for years.

Tragic, to only know a person through the prism (prison that you've created for them.

Tell me that's not lonely.

mothra wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 8:05am:

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:56am: mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:47am: There are no words .... Oh, there are words, dear. It helps to blend them up and turn them into a tasty smoothie. Nutritious and delicious. Miam miam, no? Horseboy reckons he has a wife and a daughter. That just rips my heart out. Not only regarding my concerns on their behalf but the evidencing of his absolute failure to get to know other humans around him in close capacity for years. Tragic, to only know a person through the prism (prison that you've created for them. Tell me that's not lonely.

2 daughters
Eldest married to an aboriginal boy,  3 sons   just done a tour of the USA for 6 weeks with her family and staff .
Makes 10 x what I make.
Second daughter works for the first

I have a great relationship with them
They have never seen me angry and they were raised pretty free range and allowed to do just about anything.
If it doesn't bring you joy, why bother is the family motto.

Don't know how joyful you are mothra.
Wouldn't cast criticism of your mothering skills the way you just trashed my fathering skills.

I guess that s a point of difference between us. :)

Sounds like Mum raised them and you're trying to spin being an absent father into some valiant deed.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:18am:

Makes 10 x what I make.

You seem obsessed with wealth.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:24am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:18am: Makes 10 x what I make. You seem obsessed with wealth.

Nah, we are pretty abundant.
Poor people are obsessed with wealth

SadKangaroo wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:21am:

Sounds like Mum raised them and you're trying to spin being an absent father into some valiant deed.

Please show the evidence I was an absent father  :D

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:24am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:18am: Makes 10 x what I make. You seem obsessed with wealth. Nah, we are pretty abundant. Poor people are obsessed with wealth

It's your main measure of success.

You always bring it up.

Popularity and Money - you believe those are the most important things in the world.

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:29am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:26am: greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:24am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:18am: Makes 10 x what I make. You seem obsessed with wealth. Nah, we are pretty abundant. Poor people are obsessed with wealth It's your main measure of success. You always bring it up. Popularity and Money - you believe those are the most important things in the world.

Nah.

You need to get money abundance, then you can ignore it
You need to get intimacy abundance then you can ignore it
You need to concentrate on momento mori then you can ignore death.

It's the people lined up to buy lotto tickets or the people trying to creepily chat up a co worker or the people terrified of covid who haven't solved the problem and so are obsessed with cash sex or death.

The only way out of it is to solve the problem and then transcend it.

As for money in relation to sex, it makes virtually no difference.

A broke Brazilian backpacker with a cheeky smile  and a joyful eye will outperform any doctor or lawyer at a party.

Unless that doctor or lawyer has learnt how to have swagger, confidence and a ton of good emotions

We can answer their questions.
But they can't answer ours.

Jasin wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 12:05pm:

We can answer their questions.

1. Did a jury find that Trump deliberately and forcibly penetrated Ms. Carroll with his fingers?

2. Did a jury find him liable for sexually abusing her?

mothra wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:47am:

There are no words ....

Don't worry, speechless pouting frightbat, Sad Little Teapot will to help you out, he's got all the words, and then some, gawdelpus. Tsk, tsk  ::) ::)

Frank wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 12:26pm:

mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:47am: There are no words .... Don't worry, speechless pouting frightbat, Sad Little Teapot will to help you out, he's got all the words, and then some, gawdelpus. Tsk, tsk  ::) ::)

Oh, look.. The Frank Show has started early today.

I was about to go out for a while but I might stay around for a good laugh.

Bit cold and wet outside today anyway.

:)

Carl D wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 12:30pm:

Frank wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 12:26pm: mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:47am: There are no words .... Don't worry, speechless pouting frightbat, Sad Little Teapot will to help you out, he's got all the words, and then some, gawdelpus. Tsk, tsk  ::) ::) Oh, look.. The Frank Show has started early today. I was about to go out for a while but I might stay around for a good laugh. Bit cold and wet outside today anyway. :)

Irish coffee on Sunday morning?   :-/

Pace yourself, Frank.

Any yes, I was about to venture out for a bacon & egg roll, but the weather has turned nasty again :(

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:28pm:

Only because of the statute of limitations. https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2023-01/Carroll%20II%20DI%2038...

"Both sides appear to assume that this claim would have been barred by the statute of limitations. This decision so assumes for ease of expression. Nevertheless, the question of whether the claims asserted in this case would be time-barred in the absence of the ASA is not before me, and I do not now decide it. In view of my ruling on the constitutionality of the ASA, the issue is immaterial."

And she didn't have the time to file it. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 10:46pm:

Hi Lee, are you saying assault is okay?

Which assault dear? And no assault is not ok.
;)

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 6:14pm:

And battery is not ok.

mothra wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 7:21pm:

Would it be rape anywhere else?

In what particular jurisdiction? In a civil court? In a criminal court?

So many questions you could have asked but didn't.

“As the court explained in its recent decision denying Mr Trump’s motion for a new trial on damages and other relief [in the New York case] … based on all of the evidence at trial and the jury’s verdict as a whole, the jury’s finding that Mr Trump ‘sexually abused’ Ms Carroll implicitly determined that he forcibly penetrated her digitally – in other words, that Mr Trump in fact did ‘rape’ Ms Carroll as that term commonly is used and understood in contexts outside of the New York penal law.”

And yet - no criminal charges.

Please explain, slimey creep.

Frank wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 5:57pm:

And yet - no criminal charges. Please explain, slimey creep.

Statute of limitations.

You are lying again, as usual, nclean, slimey creep.

Frank wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 9:05pm:

You are lying again, as usual, nclean, slimey creep.

E. Jean Carroll sued Trump for defamation as a last resort. Blame the statute of limitations.

The problem is that many alleged victims of sexual assault, like Carroll, cannot avail themselves of the criminal justice system. At the time when Carroll alleges Trump raped her, the statute of limitations for rape in the state of New York was five years. In 2006, New York changed the law and abolished the statute of limitations for certain types of assault, but that change does not apply retroactively to crimes committed before 2006.

Frank wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 9:05pm:

You are lying again, as usual, nclean, slimey creep.

Then why did she not make the claim in time, long ago, and before it could be used as a political weapon against Trump?  Civil decision - ask Aussie about Deuce being a rapist because some hooded Catholic school boy judge says he had to be overcome with lust so he must have done it.... errrrr..... yes, judgie - there was no evidence of any kind that he was 'overcome with lust' ....

Anyway - this is a charade...

lee wrote on Jun 21^st, 2025 at 5:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 8:13pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 6:25pm: John Smith wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:49pm: lee wrote on Jun 20th, 2025 at 5:05pm: I already answered. It was not rape according to the New York legislation. And under the rules of human decency? Was it rape then? Sorry. I don't do moral judgements. The padre is in at 7. ;) that you're so quick to defend rapists already tells me you are immoral. Poor Guido. Can't tell non-judgement from defence of someone. guido, gweggy and karny -The happy Bankwest (Spoonerism alert) triumvirate of circle jerks. ;D

non judgement?  ;D ;D deflecting away every time it is even mentioned certainly sounds like judgement to me :D

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 7:03am:

One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women.

No it is not, you dumbarse :D

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:26am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:24am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 11:18am: Makes 10 x what I make. You seem obsessed with wealth. Nah, we are pretty abundant. Poor people are obsessed with wealth

thats why you mention it every single time you mention your daughter  ;D ;D ;D

Pathetic lying Trolls and their desperate need for attention.

John Smith wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:49am:

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:03am: One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women. No it is not, you dumbarse :D

He just can't help himself, can he?  :D

Oh, and...

welch /wĕlch/

noun

A person who defaults on an obligation, especially a small one.

verb

To fail to repay a small debt.

Perhaps he means Welsh?

That d@mn autocorrect on the phone again, no doubt.  ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 8:49pm:

Frank wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 5:57pm: And yet - no criminal charges. Please explain, slimey creep. Statute of limitations.

:D ;) :D ;D ;D


What?! She forgot it for 20+ years??  Then saw some obscure guy on tv coming down an escalator and it all started to come back to her? "Who's that bloke? Where did I see him before? Wait a minute! "

Like that, eh.

Carl D wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2025 at 8:49am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:03am: One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women. No it is not, you dumbarse :D He just can't help himself, can he?  :D Oh, and... welch /wĕlch/ noun A person who defaults on an obligation, especially a small one. verb To fail to repay a small debt. Perhaps he means Welsh? That d@mn autocorrect on the phone again, no doubt.  ;D

I'm not sure ... Horseboy certainly sounds like a welcher

Carl D wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2025 at 8:49am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:03am: One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women. No it is not, you dumbarse :D He just can't help himself, can he?  :D Oh, and... welch /wĕlch/ noun A person who defaults on an obligation, especially a small one. verb To fail to repay a small debt. Perhaps he means Welsh? That d@mn autocorrect on the phone again, no doubt.  ;D

To welch or welsh is slang meaning to renege on a bet or agreement. The word started life as an ethnic slur, implying the Welsh people were dishonest, Welch being an older spelling variant of Welsh. As such use of the word is best avoided.

aquascoot wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 11:18am:

mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 8:05am: Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:56am: mothra wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:47am: There are no words .... Oh, there are words, dear. It helps to blend them up and turn them into a tasty smoothie. Nutritious and delicious. Miam miam, no? Horseboy reckons he has a wife and a daughter. That just rips my heart out. Not only regarding my concerns on their behalf but the evidencing of his absolute failure to get to know other humans around him in close capacity for years. Tragic, to only know a person through the prism (prison that you've created for them. Tell me that's not lonely. 2 daughters Eldest married to an aboriginal boy,  3 sons   just done a tour of the USA for 6 weeks with her family and staff . Makes 10 x what I make. Second daughter works for the first I have a great relationship with them They have never seen me angry and they were raised pretty free range and allowed to do just about anything. If it doesn't bring you joy, why bother is the family motto. Don't know how joyful you are mothra. Wouldn't cast criticism of your mothering skills the way you just trashed my fathering skills. I guess that s a point of difference between us. :)

Do you know what you are, dear?

You're morally superior.

We mean this in the nicest possible way, no?

SO UNFAIR !!!

Jasin wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2025 at 12:05pm:

We can answer their questions. But they can't answer ours.

Thanks, JaSin. Which country are you in?

Cheers.

John Smith wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:43am:

deflecting away every time it is even mentioned certainly sounds like judgement to me

That's because you are backward. Non-judgement is judgement? ;D ;D ;D ;D

Carl D wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2025 at 8:49am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:03am: One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women. No it is not, you dumbarse :D He just can't help himself, can he?  :D Oh, and... welch /wĕlch/ noun A person who defaults on an obligation, especially a small one. verb To fail to repay a small debt. Perhaps he means Welsh? That d@mn autocorrect on the phone again, no doubt.  ;D

Meh


When you're accumulating lots of wins, learning how to spell " Welch" is something I leave to the loser pedants  ;)

lee wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 1:32pm:

John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2025 at 8:43am: deflecting away every time it is even mentioned certainly sounds like judgement to me That's because you are backward. Non-judgement is judgement? ;D ;D ;D ;D

no, that's because I'm a realist ....

whilst you try to hide behind word play,  your efforts are wasted with me. Everyone here can see who you support, even if you can't bring yourself to admit it ..even to yourself maybe. ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 5:47pm:

no, that's because I'm a realist ....

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Carl D wrote on Jun 23^rd, 2025 at 8:59am:

John Smith wrote on Jun 23rd, 2025 at 8:49am: aquascoot wrote on Jun 22nd, 2025 at 7:03am: One of my daughters friends bedded a Welch rugby captain. And she took selfies in bed and shared that photo like she was so proud. This is normal behaviour  now for young women. No it is not, you dumbarse :D He just can't help himself, can he?  :D Oh, and... welch /wĕlch/ noun A person who defaults on an obligation, especially a small one. verb To fail to repay a small debt. Perhaps he means Welsh? That d@mn autocorrect on the phone again, no doubt.  ;D

E.G.: Gregg welching on his bets.