He can't even look Capitol Police in the eye, nor can he tell the truth after being caught blatantly lying by Senator Schiff...

https://youtu.be/HHNPpyrnDWg?si=uPcLUsiCIhYLmve_

Adam Schiff CALLED OUT LIVE On The View For Russiagate Lies |Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Hpy2N-e-78

Harriet Hageman Hammers Adam Schiff, Accuses Him Of 'Compulsive' Lying

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOqa6lK5BBc

Rachel Maddow & MSM HAMMERED For Repeating Adam Schiff's Lies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oycfk0-BuYk

'He Lies To Us!': Top Republican Rips Adam Schiff Over Hunter Biden Claims

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1APgTdLwSA

"Kash Patel is a lying turd"

Indeed, he is.

Adam Schiff has been lying for the past two years: Chaffetz

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh0rSWqw-t4

Limbaugh: Swalwell, Schiff are lying to the American people

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwH04IWpE04

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNMif7xEU4

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:30am:

Adam Schiff CALLED OUT LIVE On The View For Russiagate Lies |Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Hpy2N-e-78

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:31am:

Harriet Hageman Hammers Adam Schiff, Accuses Him Of 'Compulsive' Lying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOqa6lK5BBc

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:33am:

Rachel Maddow & MSM HAMMERED For Repeating Adam Schiff's Lies https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oycfk0-BuYk

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:35am:

'He Lies To Us!': Top Republican Rips Adam Schiff Over Hunter Biden Claims https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1APgTdLwSA

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:52am:

Adam Schiff has been lying for the past two years: Chaffetz https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh0rSWqw-t4

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 7:53am:

Limbaugh: Swalwell, Schiff are lying to the American people https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwH04IWpE04

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNMif7xEU4

DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 9:17am:

Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lNMif7xEU4 DEFLECT, DEFLECT, DEFLECT!!!

You've certainly triggered Leroy   :)

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:07am:

He can't even look Capitol Police in the eye, nor can he tell the truth after being caught blatantly lying by Senator Schiff... https://youtu.be/HHNPpyrnDWg?si=uPcLUsiCIhYLmve_

Schtiff is verbaling him.

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 8:53am:

Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California

I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW

;D ;D ;D ;D

dam hilarious

John Smith wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:18am:

Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious

Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

AND whats worse, his supporters cheer him on for doing so :D

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 11:25am:

John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions.

Gissa few for examples.

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 12:29pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples.

How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:11pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it?

The list of examples is just too long.

Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy.

The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings.

The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”.

For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:15pm:

Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump.

Armchair was talking about laws.
You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action.

Not the same thing, unflushable.

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:19pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable.

Judicial orders are considered law.

Ignoring them is against the law.

FFS, where did you go to school?   ::)

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 1:26pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::)

They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending..

Ignoring a judicial order is against the law.

FFS, how do you remember to breathe?

"Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:32pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable."

TDS again, the president of El Salvador Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez, the country where Garcia is a citizen has told the US that he is not returning Garcia to the US. What is the US judge going to do, put Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez of El Salvador in prison or is he going to order the US military to invade El Salvador and kidnap Garcia.

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ...

Changing the subject again when proven wrong.

How very freediver of you.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:40pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you.

Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:08pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk.

White flag accepted.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:21pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk. White flag accepted.

Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 4:31pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:21pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk. White flag accepted. Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future.

Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor.
They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:21pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk. White flag accepted. Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future. Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor. They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that.

White flag accepted.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:42pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 5:42pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:21pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk. White flag accepted. Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future. Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor. They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that. White flag accepted.

Thank you, Bbwiyawn.

Carry on.

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 5:42pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 5:42pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:31pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:21pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 4:08pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:40pm: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:36pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, ... Changing the subject again when proven wrong. How very freediver of you. Well, go ahead, enforce them, punk. White flag accepted. Yes your white flag is officially accepted, so please try and keep your TDS in check in future. Exactly. Punk's balls are nailed to the floor. They always say 'white flag accepted' when their balls are nailed to the floor. Everybody knows that. White flag accepted. Thank you, Bbwiyawn. Carry on.

White flag accepted.

You are avoiding the crux of the matter, punk.

How to enforce the judge's orders?

Any thoughts, punk? (No) Or are you just a wind- up monkey with cymbals? (Yes)

https://i.giphy.com/l4FGmO3MZkGng9Bp6.gif

Frank wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:01pm:

You are avoiding the crux of the matter, ...

No.

You are changing the subject because you were proven wrong.

However, I have graciously accepted your white flag.

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 6:05pm:

Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 6:01pm: You are avoiding the crux of the matter, ... No. You are changing the subject because you were proven wrong. However, I have gracefully accepted your white flag.

You are lying, punk, as you always do.

1 you have not shown how Patel lied.

2 you have not shown how judicial orders about a deported gangsters can be enforced

3. You have not shown what jurisdiction a NY federal judge could possibly have over Executive powers of conducting foreign policy, powers under which Garcia was deported.

4. You have not shown what powers anyone in the US, executive or judicial, have to facilitate the removal of an El Salvadorean prison inmate from prison and transport him to the US.




Keep banging your cymbals, monkey.

Leroy wrote on May 16^th, 2025 at 3:36pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:32pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 3:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:26pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:15pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 1:11pm: Frank wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 12:29pm: Armchair_Politician wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:25am: John Smith wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 11:18am: Leroy wrote on May 16th, 2025 at 8:53am: Senator Adam Schiff Broke Federal and State Laws to Escape California I'm sorry, are the retarded right suddenly ppretending to care about the LAW ;D ;D ;D ;D dam hilarious Trump dismisses laws outright (as they pertain to him personally) and thinks the Constitution is a list of suggestions. Gissa few for examples. How about his refusal to return a man from El Salvador who was deported against the ruling of the Court? Or the numerous times Trump has said he will seek a way to run for a third term, despite the Constitution explicitly forbidding it? The list of examples is just too long. Donald Trump’s second administration has shown an “unprecedented degree of resistance” to adverse court rulings, experts say, part of a forceful attack on the American judiciary that threatens to undermine the rule of law, undercut a co-equal branch of government and weaken American democracy. The attacks, experts say, threaten one of the fundamental pillars of American government: that the judicial branch has the power to interpret the law and the other branches will abide by its rulings. The attack came to a head this week when the Trump administration ignored an order from US district judge James Boasberg to turn planes carrying deportees around. “I don’t care what the judges think,” Thomas Homan, charged with enforcing Trump’s deportation agenda, said in a Fox News television interview on Monday as the decision came under scrutiny. The next day, Trump called for Boasberg to be impeached, calling him a “radical left lunatic”. For months, the Trump administration has made it clear they believe they can ignore judicial orders. “Judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” vice-president JD Vance tweeted on 9 February. Elon Musk, Trump’s top adviser, has repeatedly called for impeaching judges, and is donating to Republicans in Congress who have supported doing so. House Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach Boasberg and four other judges who have ruled against Trump. Armchair was talking about laws. You are blathering about judges making rulings on the hop to contradict executive action. Not the same thing, unflushable. Judicial orders are considered law. Ignoring them is against the law. FFS, where did you go to school?   ::) They are not law. They are appealable. And are appealed. So they are pending.. Ignoring a judicial order is against the law. FFS, how do you remember to breathe? "Judicial orders are considered law and must be obeyed by the parties involved. These orders, which are decisions or judgments made by a judicial officer, are binding and enforceable." TDS again, the president of El Salvador Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez, the country where Garcia is a citizen has told the US that he is not returning Garcia to the US. What is the US judge going to do, put Nayib Armando Bukele Ortez of El Salvador in prison or is he going to order the US military to invade El Salvador and kidnap Garcia.

Oh, I see! So you're blaming these tinted tinpot dictators, are you? These cruel third world banana republics, so mean and nasty to their fellow citizens.

Well, I'm curious. Why is Uncle footing the bill? Why is Uncle currently paying for an entire maximum security prison in El Salvador to house people indefinitely?

Even convicts sent to Australia were released or granted reprieve. DL's prisoners don't even get a trial. Think of that - 18th century England was more humane that 21st century America.

FD never answered questions, Leroy.

You?

FD wrote on May 17^th, 2025 at 3:10pm:

Oh, I see! So you're blaming these tinted tinpot dictators, are you? These cruel third world banana republics, so mean and nasty to their fellow citizens. Well, I'm curious. Why is Uncle footing the bill? Why is Uncle currently paying for an entire maximum security prison in El Salvador to house people indefinitely? Even convicts sent to Australia were released or granted reprieve. DL's prisoners don't even get a trial. Think of that - 18th century England was more humane that 21st century America. FD never answered questions, Leroy. You?

Karnal,
do you know - the man he likes you? - he really likes you.