Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Aboriginal Affairs >> The VOICE 2.0…
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1746085916

Message started by SerialBrain9 on May 1st, 2025 at 5:51pm

Title: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by SerialBrain9 on May 1st, 2025 at 5:51pm
Can someone tell Wong, the Labor Party and the Greens

NO MEANS NO!!! ….

How many billions will they waste to try and push through their divisive “Voice” which will see the END of Australia???

They can GGF…. 🖕

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 1st, 2025 at 6:14pm
Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.
Taking_down_the_Mau_Mau_1_002.png (205 KB | 17 )

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Daves2017 on May 1st, 2025 at 11:56pm
It’s politicians.

They have an wheelbarrow to push .

They will find anyway to push that wheelbarrow over you.

And they will try again and again.

They have deep pockets, costing them nothing.

Your paying for the wheelbarrow!


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by SerialBrain9 on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:50am

Daves2017 wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 11:56pm:
It’s politicians.

They have an wheelbarrow to push .

They will find anyway to push that wheelbarrow over you.

And they will try again and again.

They have deep pockets, costing them nothing.

Your paying for the wheelbarrow!


Exactly right Davo…

Which begs the question  - who in the hell are they working for?

Its NOT the Australian people…

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by SerialBrain9 on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…

I wish they’d keep their promise…

In this election i put a Dyson LAST…

A so-called independent (TEAL) which has been funded by climate 200 - funded by billionaires to push through GREEN  ::)- contracts so that they make more billions of dollars… he’s received over 1 Million Dollars for this elections…

So he’s last, he’s a lying weasel who’s planning to put Windmills in our Marine Bays and Whale 🐳 nursery  >:(

So from the bottom, Dyson, Teals, Greens, Labor, Drug Party, Liberals,
From the Top, Conservative Independents/Small Parties…

Family First
One Nation
Trumpets  ;D
Independent

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 2nd, 2025 at 9:32am

Brian Ross wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 6:14pm:
Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)


You certainly are Tsk, tsk, tsk ... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Bobby. on May 2nd, 2025 at 9:33am

No more welcome to country nonsense.   >:(

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 2nd, 2025 at 9:34am

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…

I wish they’d keep their promise…

In this election i put a Dyson LAST…

A so-called independent (TEAL) which has been funded by climate 200 - funded by billionaires to push through GREEN  ::)- contracts so that they make more billions of dollars… he’s received over 1 Million Dollars for this elections…

So he’s last, he’s a lying weasel who’s planning to put Windmills in our Marine Bays and Whale 🐳 nursery  >:(

So from the bottom, Dyson, Teals, Greens, Labor, Drug Party, Liberals,
From the Top, Conservative Independents/Small Parties…

Family First
One Nation
Trumpets  ;D
Independent


Did roughly the same for my region.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:38am

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who said that CerealBrain9?  I can find no record of such a promise.  Sure it wasn't in your imagination like so much you claim?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by greggerypeccary on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:52am

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by tickleandrose on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:55am
Trumpets of Patriots?  Really...  Australia is doomed. 

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4



temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition



Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by SerialBrain9 on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:24am

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4



temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Watch Greggy and Brian disappear….🫠

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by John Smith on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:28pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?



the voices in his head

the same place he gets all his other news ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by John Smith on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:31pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4



temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


;D ;D ;D

English is not your forte is it Agatha

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 2nd, 2025 at 2:05pm
Marcia Langton - a 'professor' of some kind of identifying Aboriginal artefacts from some pokey little college in Mau Mau Country, way out on some dusty peninsula way up north there and of which nobody has ever heard - is an 'academic'?

Over-rated, over-indulged, over-stated, overpaid and over here... what a laugh.

Aboriginal Participation in simple class award professor.

Let's make Brian a Professor of identifying times to tsk, tsk.... step forward, Professor Brian!!  We don't always agree with your work and its essential simplicity, but we do see and value its input!!

Professor John Smith - for his long and arduous work in  identifying occasions to use lambast and hyperbole instead of reason... Professor Smith has opened up new frontiers of human knowledge....

Professor mothra - for adding to human knowledge by identifying opportunities to sail in with ad homs and an utter lack of supporting evidence for views, thus creating a new form of discussion..

Professor Phil from Perth - for developing the art of name-calling and personal insult to the highest degree of uncivilised behaviour, while retaining and extending the properties and merits of both Professor Smith and Professor mothra...

Professor Sad Kanga - for relentless dedication to personal put-down and ascension to the lofty heights of moral and intellectual superiority in his own lunch-time....

Professor dividie  - in acknowledgement of his uncanny ability to turn around and around like a dog chasing its tail, building an edifice of his Reason piece by piece into a house of cards that has withstood all attempts to reduce it to reason...

Step forward - all you New Professors...  Freediver's new OzPol University welcomes you all ...

Oh - and Professor Grappler for his dedicated work in developing being a bastard born and bred to the lofty heights of total superiority over all contenders... ya coulda bin a contender, but nothin' more, chumps.....  the Old Master has you by the hearts, minds and balls..




Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:43pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Marcia Langton:

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”

This means that if the Voice referendum fails, aborigines like her will say no to performing WTC even if non-aborigines have the temerity to ask for it.  Non-aborigines should not now have the temerity to look her in the eye and ask for a WTC ceremony and she would say no even if they did.



This is what she said and this is what it means.  I don't know what you think it means if not this. Do tell us.










Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:55pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:43pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)


I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Marcia Langton:

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”

This means that if the Voice referendum fails, aborigines like her will say no to performing WTC even if non-aborigines have the temerity to ask for it.  Non-aborigines should not now have the temerity to look her in the eye and ask for a WTC ceremony and she would say no even if they did.

This is what she said and this is what it means.  I don't know what you think it means if not this. Do tell us.


I read, "If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no." which is not, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" which is what CerealBrain9 claimed was said.  Now, rather than be an ignoramus and claim something says something it doesn't, Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD and show us where it was claimed, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…" or is English a too hard a language for you to understand, Dane?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by greggerypeccary on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm
Peccary twisting like another Japanese carrier at Midway...


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.



Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.


Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.



Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:16pm
Peccary twisting like another Japanese carrier at Midway...


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by greggerypeccary on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:18pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.



Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.


Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


White flag accepted.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by SerialBrain9 on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  ;D

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:33pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

I gave you the accurate quote, incomprehending cvvnt.
**** off, moron.



Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  ;D


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:42pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:27pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:15pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:09pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:33pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 1:24pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4

temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition


Where does she say, "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed… ?"  As usual you are trying to bullshit us with a non-sequitur.  Typical Soren tactic.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)



I even highlighted it, blind bat, and you still missed it.  ;D ;D


That doesn't say: "They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…"

You must have highlighted the wrong bit.


Both you and Bbwiyawn are sly idiots, liars and ****wits.

You put Serial's words between quotation marks and then moronically pretend he was quoting an Aborigines verbatim. He wasn't. He conveyed the meaning of what Langdon said, whose actual words I quilted.

Now **** off, both of you, lying bozos.


Why are we "lying", Soren?  All I have asked is an accurate quote that reflects what CerealBrain9 proclaimed.  How is that, "lying"?  The only people who seem upset are those who want to believe what ever they want about Indigenous Australians.  Does that describe you, Soren?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

I gave you the accurate quote, incomprehending cvvnt.
**** off, moron.


You claimed it was accurate but your quote conveyed very accurately what Marcia Langton said, which wasn't what CerealBrain9 said.  Why do you claim the reverse all the time, Soren?  What was your PhD thesis like with these inaccurate quotes?  I wonder about you and your claims.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  ;D


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

You are lying, nappy shitter.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:57pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  ;D


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

You are lying, nappy shitter.


Why?  Because I ask for accuracy rather than approximation?  Just because you want to believe whatever that is insulting about Indigenous Australians is indicative of how you regard people different to yourself.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 2nd, 2025 at 8:06pm

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:57pm:

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:46pm:

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:36pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 6:28pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 4:44pm:
"Speaking to The Australian in April, Prof Langton said if the Voice failed non-Indigenous Australians would feel too ashamed to ask traditional owners to do a Welcome to Country.

'How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference?' she said.

'If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.'"


Well - nobody's asking.... so there's no need for her to say no, ay?


greggy and Brian had 2 options…

Run away like little girls (which they do regularly)

Or try and stay and twist things into something they are NOT…

Looks like they chose the latter in this case…

Pathetic Losers…  ;D


Oh, dearie, dearie, me, CerealBrain9 you really need to work on your insulting technique.  That was utterly pathetic, you really need to work on that.  You seem to have posted at the near same time I did.  I not have run away, I am here.  You weren't terribly accurate in your quote, either, now were you?  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

You are lying, nappy shitter.


Why?  Because I ask for accuracy rather than approximation?  Just because you want to believe whatever that is insulting about Indigenous Australians is indicative of how you regard people different to yourself.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Here's a challenge you will scuttle away from, nappy shitter:

What do you think Langton, the author of a landmark report on the Voice,  said and meant  here:

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake. “I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”




Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:22pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 8:06pm:
Here's a challenge you will scuttle away from, nappy shitter:

What do you think Langton, the author of a landmark report on the Voice,  said and meant  here:

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake. “I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”


Another non-sequitur, Soren?  What Marcia Langton said in the Murdock rag is not what we were discussing.  We were discussing CerealBrain9's claims about what Indigenous Australians (note the use of the plural) claimed to have said.  Stick to the topic and stop trying to change it every post.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Baronvonrort on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm
.
Promises_002.png (206 KB | 13 )

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Sir Eoin O Fada on May 3rd, 2025 at 9:23am

Baronvonrort wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm:
.

If only.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 3rd, 2025 at 9:25am

Baronvonrort wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:36pm:
.



Another white blackfella activist taking backhanders from the resource industry.  ::)

Sour nasty racist bint she is.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by John Smith on May 3rd, 2025 at 9:47am

Brian Ross wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 3:33pm:
Soren, how about you prove you have a PhD

:D :D :D :D

unless 'PhD' stands for 'Pharken dickhead', I think he's going to struggle with that one

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by KangAnon on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Boris on May 4th, 2025 at 8:59am
Behaviour

First Nations children represented 13% of all child homicide victims.

Counting missing First Nations women and children was equally problematic, somewhat owing to some jurisdictions not recording Indigenous status in their figures.


Despite the flawed data, the Senate inquiry heard 20% of missing women in Australia are Aboriginal women. The report found First Nations children and youth are over-represented in the out-of-home care system (approximately one in 18) and are

markedly overrepresented in reports of missing children. These children make up 53% of missing children reports.

Not only are First Nations women and children more likely to go missing, they are less likely to be found.

The inquiry also heard the problematic nature of the language of “missing” as being passive, and somehow suggestive that people go deliberately missing. We agree with Amy McQuire’s argument that these First Nations women and children are not missing – but disappeared.

https://theconversation.com/the-report-on-murdered-and-missing-indigenous-women-and-children-fails-to-hold-anyone-to-account-its-not-enough-236941

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 4th, 2025 at 11:34am

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?


Well - Wong is a racist... we'll add her to the list for you.. mothra will be around soon to waste her brain cells on 'old WHITE men'.... those who unilaterally support some silly voice supremacist move will be kicking around the edges now and raving again about the evils of white society here while eating well, growing fat and over a fine meal or something at a good restaurant on their expense accounts ....

We don't see these 'racists' in your mind doing the crimes and all the graffiti and destruction, do we.... so I think you need to straighten up and fly right, kid.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by KangAnon on May 4th, 2025 at 10:35pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 11:34am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?


Well - Wong is a racist... we'll add her to the list for you.. mothra will be around soon to waste her brain cells on 'old WHITE men'.... those who unilaterally support some silly voice supremacist move will be kicking around the edges now and raving again about the evils of white society here while eating well, growing fat and over a fine meal or something at a good restaurant on their expense accounts ....

We don't see these 'racists' in your mind doing the crimes and all the graffiti and destruction, do we.... so I think you need to straighten up and fly right, kid.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


The country decided flying to the right wasnt' for us.

You're being left behind old man.  The sooner you take your bigotry to the grave, the better for the rest of us.

Off ya pop.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 4th, 2025 at 10:46pm

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 10:35pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 11:34am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?


Well - Wong is a racist... we'll add her to the list for you.. mothra will be around soon to waste her brain cells on 'old WHITE men'.... those who unilaterally support some silly voice supremacist move will be kicking around the edges now and raving again about the evils of white society here while eating well, growing fat and over a fine meal or something at a good restaurant on their expense accounts ....

We don't see these 'racists' in your mind doing the crimes and all the graffiti and destruction, do we.... so I think you need to straighten up and fly right, kid.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


The country decided flying to the right wasnt' for us.

You're being left behind old man.  The sooner you take your bigotry to the grave, the better for the rest of us.

Off ya pop.


So now - in your imagination, kid - you think Australia is going to accept your racist 'voice' madness now - after they've already banned it as is the people's right in a democracy - and if your lot take it up again, somehow everyone will just smile and pat you on the head and say 'nice boy'.

The moment you start to repeat the silly words - like 'bigotry', and 'history passed you by' - at a time when across the world history is showing those who were saying that as a slight that history is passing THEM by - everyone knows you have no idea of history in any way - and are a bigoted little twerp against your elders and betters.

You are the problem - not the solution...

Taking_down_the_Mau_Mau_1_005.png (205 KB | 16 )

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Boris on May 5th, 2025 at 10:22am

Boris wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 8:59am:
Behaviour

First Nations children represented 13% of all child homicide victims.

Counting missing First Nations women and children was equally problematic, somewhat owing to some jurisdictions not recording Indigenous status in their figures.


Despite the flawed data, the Senate inquiry heard 20% of missing women in Australia are Aboriginal women. The report found First Nations children and youth are over-represented in the out-of-home care system (approximately one in 18) and are markedly overrepresented in reports of missing children. These children make up 53% of missing children reports.

Not only are First Nations women and children more likely to go missing, they are less likely to be found.

The inquiry also heard the problematic nature of the language of “missing” as being passive, and somehow suggestive that people go deliberately missing. We agree with Amy McQuire’s argument that these First Nations women and children are not missing – but disappeared.

https://theconversation.com/the-report-on-murdered-and-missing-indigenous-women-and-children-fails-to-hold-anyone-to-account-its-not-enough-236941


This is ignored by the Left - I do not ignore it because I had to deal with it as a First Responder.



Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 5th, 2025 at 12:37pm
Machete-wielding black thugs on the run after terrifying Brisbane home invasion

Police did not include a description of the trio, but they appear to be of aboriginal, African or Pacific Islander descent and locals have previously complained about teenage criminals from those groups terrorising the area.

Almost 3,000 frustrated residents have joined a local neighbourhood watch group to fight crime in Brisbane’s south, forcing police to launch a new covert operation to stop groups of thugs terrorising locals.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by John Smith on May 5th, 2025 at 1:14pm

Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 11:03am:

greggerypeccary wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 10:41am:

SerialBrain9 wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 1st, 2025 at 10:04pm:
The Civil War was declared by the others on Australia following the collapse of Voice 1.0 - you have yet to understand that.

We, the Australian people who rejected the voice - were told to our faces that there would be an Intifada if we rejected it - and so it came to pass with the escalating crime etc.

Do not vote for any person who supports or enables this madness.


They promised NOT to give welcome to country if the Voice 1.0 failed…


Who promised that?

When?

Do you have a link to that, Annie Oakley?

Marcia Langton.

Over more than 50 years as an academic and activist, Marcia Langton has never been known to mince her words. But now the Melbourne University professor, Boyer lecturer, public intellectual and co-author of a landmark report on the Indigenous Voice to parliament and government has really had enough. When Australians go to the polls to vote on the Voice later this year, Langton wants them to think hard about what’s at stake.

“I imagine that most Australians who are non-Indigenous, if we lose the ­referendum, will not be able to look me in the eye,” she says. “How are they going to ever ask an Indigenous person, a Traditional Owner, for a welcome to country? How are they ever going to be able to ask me to come and speak at their conference? If they have the temerity to do it, of course the answer is going to be no.”
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/marcia-langtons-fight-to-be-heard-reaches-its-crescendo-with-indigenous-voice-to-parliament/news-story/c49338fbc21b72a9c012d65bc8eafda4



temerity
1. unreasonable or foolhardy contempt of danger or opposition



You dumbarse. Did you not notice that in the sentence before that she was talking SPECIFICALLY about herself?

There is no way known to man that you have a PhD ... not unless it's in cretinology.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 5th, 2025 at 2:07pm

Boris wrote on May 5th, 2025 at 10:22am:

Boris wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 8:59am:
Behaviour

First Nations children represented 13% of all child homicide victims.

Counting missing First Nations women and children was equally problematic, somewhat owing to some jurisdictions not recording Indigenous status in their figures.

Despite the flawed data, the Senate inquiry heard 20% of missing women in Australia are Aboriginal women. The report found First Nations children and youth are over-represented in the out-of-home care system (approximately one in 18) and are markedly overrepresented in reports of missing children. These children make up 53% of missing children reports.

Not only are First Nations women and children more likely to go missing, they are less likely to be found.

The inquiry also heard the problematic nature of the language of “missing” as being passive, and somehow suggestive that people go deliberately missing. We agree with Amy McQuire’s argument that these First Nations women and children are not missing – but disappeared.

https://theconversation.com/the-report-on-murdered-and-missing-indigenous-women-and-children-fails-to-hold-anyone-to-account-its-not-enough-236941


This is ignored by the Left - I do not ignore it because I had to deal with it as a First Responder.


Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 5th, 2025 at 4:19pm

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 10:35pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 11:34am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?


Well - Wong is a racist... we'll add her to the list for you.. mothra will be around soon to waste her brain cells on 'old WHITE men'.... those who unilaterally support some silly voice supremacist move will be kicking around the edges now and raving again about the evils of white society here while eating well, growing fat and over a fine meal or something at a good restaurant on their expense accounts ....

We don't see these 'racists' in your mind doing the crimes and all the graffiti and destruction, do we.... so I think you need to straighten up and fly right, kid.    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D


The country decided flying to the right wasnt' for us.

You're being left behind old man.  The sooner you take your bigotry to the grave, the better for the rest of us.

Off ya pop.



Do us a favour ...... you first.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Baronvonrort on May 5th, 2025 at 4:40pm
AnAl created a taxpayer funded Indigenous ambassador.

He is on $400K a year racks up over $250K on the taxpayers credit card for expenses.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 5th, 2025 at 5:06pm

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 5th, 2025 at 5:08pm

Baronvonrort wrote on May 5th, 2025 at 4:40pm:
AnAl created a taxpayer funded Indigenous ambassador.

He is on $400K a year racks up over $250K on the taxpayers credit card for expenses.


Yeah - like they're Australians and have no separate sovereignty - so we need an over paid 'ambassador'.  What a load of cods.

I TOLD YOU ALL SO!

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Boris on May 7th, 2025 at 9:17am
Glassing, punch-ons: Fears violence becoming ‘worse’ in Top End suburb

As alcohol-fueled violence continues to rock the streets of Palmerston neighbourhood, residents, business owners and a local member are now calling on authorities to crack down on the wild hotspots troubling their suburb.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 8th, 2025 at 9:26pm

Boris wrote on May 7th, 2025 at 9:17am:
Glassing, punch-ons: Fears violence becoming ‘worse’ in Top End suburb

As alcohol-fueled violence continues to rock the streets of Palmerston neighbourhood, residents, business owners and a local member are now calling on authorities to crack down on the wild hotspots troubling their suburb.


Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Daves2017 on May 8th, 2025 at 11:41pm

Boris wrote on May 7th, 2025 at 9:17am:
Glassing, punch-ons: Fears violence becoming ‘worse’ in Top End suburb

As alcohol-fueled violence continues to rock the streets of Palmerston neighbourhood, residents, business owners and a local member are now calling on authorities to crack down on the wild hotspots troubling their suburb.



So absolutely nothing has changed in the seven years since I lived there obviously.

I miss it but it’s no place to raise a family.
https://amp.abc.net.au/article/105254576



Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 9th, 2025 at 9:21am
More The voice 2.5  ...

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 9th, 2025 at 11:35am

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?


Yes just a guess but I doubt it's an accurate guess.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on May 9th, 2025 at 11:38am

Brian Ross wrote on May 8th, 2025 at 9:26pm:

Boris wrote on May 7th, 2025 at 9:17am:
Glassing, punch-ons: Fears violence becoming ‘worse’ in Top End suburb

As alcohol-fueled violence continues to rock the streets of Palmerston neighbourhood, residents, business owners and a local member are now calling on authorities to crack down on the wild hotspots troubling their suburb.


Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)


Ignorant, repetitive virtue signaling softcock.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 9th, 2025 at 11:56am

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?



Is it wacist to tell Abos not to litter? Apparently.


According to the police documents, Mr Callahan and a friend were eating outside a kebab shop in Hamilton at 2am when he commented on a woman throwing some of her kebab out of a car window.

The woman got out of the car with several of her friends and a fight erupted, which broke up when a police car drove by, the fact sheet said.

Mr Callahan and his friend then walked away but were followed by two cars and ambushed. Police allege Mr Callahan was hit with a metal pole and stabbed in the abdomen while members of the aboriginal group shouted “smash him” and “kill him” while he was punched and kicked repeatedly.



What are all the Aboriginal MPs, elders, leaders, lawyers etc doing about this sort of thing?
Blame the 'wacist' victims. 

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by ProudKangaroo on May 9th, 2025 at 1:28pm

Frank wrote on May 9th, 2025 at 11:56am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?



Is it wacist to tell Abos not to litter? Apparently.


Did you feel called out by my comment bitch?

Rent Freeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 9th, 2025 at 7:14pm

SadKangaroo wrote on May 9th, 2025 at 1:28pm:

Frank wrote on May 9th, 2025 at 11:56am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?



Is it wacist to tell Abos not to litter? Apparently.


Did you feel called out by my comment bitch?

Rent Freeeeeeeeeeeeeee!



Can't offer a valid response, eh, bitch?


;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Jasin on May 9th, 2025 at 7:38pm
They can have their fake political MEDIA induced Voice.

They'll lose their Visual Art 'VISION' though with Aborigine Art sales plummeting in sacrifice.  ;D

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on May 9th, 2025 at 8:10pm

SadKangaroo wrote on May 9th, 2025 at 1:28pm:

Frank wrote on May 9th, 2025 at 11:56am:

SadKangaroo wrote on May 4th, 2025 at 7:14am:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on May 2nd, 2025 at 7:00pm:
What's most insulting about Aborigines is the way many of them persist in behaving.


I think the same about racists, maybe 10% of them are worth saving.

Since Wong floated the idea of the Voice and Labor was voted back in off that, I guess the country supports it again?



Is it wacist to tell Abos not to litter? Apparently.


Did you feel called out by my comment bitch?

Rent Freeeeeeeeeeeeeee!


Pathetic. Ridiculous.

You are like Bbwiyawn without the 'credentials'. Thicko Smith level. Except with Smith and Bbwiyawn the moronic is effortless, natural, core. But you, on the other hand, put a lot of work into it. Why?
Carry on, fluffy.


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Brian Ross on May 9th, 2025 at 8:37pm
Twilight Zone.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... ::) ::)

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Sir Eoin O Fada on May 13th, 2025 at 11:13am
When all is said and done the Voice referendum was a resounding success.

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Grappler Truth Teller on May 13th, 2025 at 2:05pm

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on May 13th, 2025 at 11:13am:
When all is said and done the Voice referendum was a resounding success.


I've been watching the world - in the Civilised Nations the idea that The People actually OWNED the power to say NO to progressive woke socialist social science nonsense took hold.... in that sense The Voice proposal made Australian into The Mouse That Roared, thus awakening the sleeping giant of The People at large in the Civilised Tribes.

It seems that - rather than being the rat laboratory - the Ward C or The Light House - for all the woke social science progressive lunacies that come along - Australia has actually shown itself to be an effective laboratory producing The Voice of the People as a whole!!

Vox Populi!!

No more calling us the Civilised Tribes because we are easy to sneak up on!

Now Stand To!!

Drain_the_billabong__008.jpg (42 KB | 11 )

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Frank on Feb 24th, 2026 at 8:54am
Albo, are you listening to the Voice

https://x.com/jonbernardk/status/2025835136563171701

Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Gnads on Feb 24th, 2026 at 9:19am

Frank wrote on Feb 24th, 2026 at 8:54am:
Albo, are you listening to the Voice

https://x.com/jonbernardk/status/2025835136563171701


;D


Title: Re: The VOICE 2.0…
Post by Jasin on Feb 24th, 2026 at 3:55pm
The ALP will push it through because they now work on the "What are you gonna do about it?"

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.