Mark Bouris issues grim retirement warning for Aussies   :(
Young workers have been told they will have no choice but to work into their later years “because you won’t have enough money”.


News.com.au
April 13, 2025

Businessman Mark Bouris has issued a grim warning for young Australians – they should be prepared to work into their 80s.   :o

Speaking on his Mentored podcast, Mr Bouris said Gen Z and Millennials “won’t be retiring at 65 … because you won’t have enough money”.

“If you’re 20 now you won’t be retiring until you’re 80, maybe 90,” he said.

“You might be putting super away, but the super you’re putting away today will never be enough by the time you’re 65 years of age in the current environment.   

“Everything’s gonna be so expensive, it’s just gonna keep going up, and up, and up. We’ve seen house prices and what they’ve done.

“If you think that you’re gonna retire at 65 or you’re gonna have enough money to retire at 65, you’ve got another thing coming.”

There is no official retirement age in Australia, but a person must be 67 before they are eligible to receive the age pension.

A report by Vanguard last year found that almost half of retirees did so earlier than they would have thought.

The average retirement age reported was 61, while those still working had an average ideal retirement age of 62.6 but an average realistic age of 67.9.

“A key factor feeding into the fear of running out of money in retirement is the ongoing increases in average life expectancy rates,” wrote senior finance writer Tony Kaye in October.

“One in two of the more than 1,800 Australians aged 18 years and over who participated in Vanguard’s retirement research said they did not know whether their money will last in retirement.”


Analysis by KPMG in 2024 found the average retirement age post-Covid had risen to the highest levels since the early 1970s.

The expected retirement age for men was 66.2 years, and for women was 64.8 years, the highest since 1972 and 1971 respectively.

“The adoption of working from home has made many older Australians in professional jobs realise that they could ‘semi-retire’ and continue to dabble in the workforce from home or even from a coastal location,” KPMG urban economist, Terry Rawnsley said.

Meanwhile the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia declared in December couples need to have $73,000 to spend each year to enjoy a “comfortable” retirement.

People are stressed about running out of money in retirement.

That figure was on the basis people owned their own home outright, a reality that has become less common for Australians due to ballooning property costs.

Mr Bouris said young workers would need to “accept” the changing goalposts and “enjoy working” for longer.

The Yellow Brick Road chief said the traditional retirement age of 65 also assumed people would die by 80 – and people were now living longer.


“If you’re going to die when you’re 100, and you retire at 65, but the assumption has been made that you’re going to die at 80, you’re going to have 20 years where you’ve got no money,’ he said.

“So I can tell you now, you will be working till you’re 80.

“So you might as well accept it now. I’m going to enjoy working, with all my mates. And hang around with people who have the same sort of view.”

Fossil fuels led to massive wealth creation

1 litre of petrol can increase a farm workers productivity 10 fold.

My 65 hp diesel tractor can do the work of 65 horses or about 500 men.



Now we are weaning off fossil fuels ( apparently) we are going to go into steady wealth decline.

No more can people expect a house with an ensuite and a 2 car garage.

If we give up fossil fuels, we give up plastics, cheap food, cheap energy and we live with much less.

You either work longer or live more simply.


" You cannot have your cake and eat it too"..... You are familiar with this concept white knight?
The green party aren't. :'( :'(

I remember that experiment with a car load of fit young men - and how it was pointed out that the one litre can of petrol could move that car seven km or something similar - and they were welcome to push it that far over hill and dale... they demurred.

With the utter disaster that has become of 'management of the economy' by both 'sides' in The Tag Team, I've been saying for years that super would not help most at all... and you've all seen what it has become - a cash cow for some alongside an opportunity to stash cash for those with plenty of discretionary and pay no taxes on it.

Alongside that you've seen the hands drawn back from Social Security as if it were a cobra about to strike and which was once listed a part of taxation on pay slips -  and the petulant re-labeling of it as a 'handout' - put simply - they stuffed it in every way ... the economy... taxation where it actually counts .... retirement funding ... the 'jobs market'  ... 'immigration to fill the GDP gap' where the reality is that suburbs are overflowing with non-productive citizens and non-taxpayers  (they come from a region with no tax - tax?  What is this tax? I make money - I keep!), while the OVERALL "GDP" might have increased (hallelujah - if I dare say that around Bankistan etc), but the actual production of anything worthwhile is through the toilet hole of the universe...  part-time casuals through the roof for most and thus ZERO chance of ever accumulating anywhere near an adequate fund in super for retirement after costs and fees and inadequate income anyway and thus incapacity to develop even a sound asset base in life - say a.... home ... until some asshole wants to drive you out of it to let in the developers or to open it up for entry into the 'housing market' so they can snap it up and make money out of the misery of the majority  .....

Greatest pack of lies ever sold to a sleeping nation - they must all think we are idiots - and they can't be far wrong..

---