America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed.

Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know.

MAGA hates our guts.

National sovereignty, innit.

Hi Karnal,
ever get the feeling that Trump is ploughing you?

Bobby. wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 1:53pm:

Hi Karnal, ever get the feeling that Trump is ploughing you?

There are those fantasies again, bubbling to the surface in a moment of emotional weakness...

I wonder if your Gab friends know just how much you really love Trump..?

I doubt they would still like you if you openly embrace team alphabet, not that there's anything wrong with that.

FD wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 1:40pm:

America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit.

Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA).

How is that  a problem ?

Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks.

If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;)

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 2:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Hi Karnal, ever get the feeling that Trump is ploughing you? There are those fantasies again, bubbling to the surface in a moment of emotional weakness... I wonder if your Gab friends know just how much you really love Trump..? I doubt they would still like you if you openly embrace team alphabet, not that there's anything wrong with that.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/329/892/small/f377462f0d4d3bc4.jpg


https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/127/308/small/fa2723ce45f4fa00.jpg


https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/127/330/small/92b51940ce836264.jpg

aquascoot wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 2:10pm:

FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:40pm: America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit. Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA). How is that  a problem ? Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks. If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;)

Why should the person you so dismissively refer to as "Trump" care about an ally with a free trade agreement?

I could provide you with the answer of every US prez since Roosevelt, dear, but a question first if I may:

Why would you care about your Australian friends, neighbours and fellow countrymen?

You clearly despise them. If you had a farm, you'd be fenced, ploughed, planted and irrigated by the one known as he.

You.

FD wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 3:59pm:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 2:10pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:40pm: America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit. Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA). How is that  a problem ? Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks. If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;) Why should the person you so dismissively refer to as "Trump" care about an ally with a free trade agreement? I could provide you with the answer of every US prez since Roosevelt, dear, but a question first if I may: Why would you care about your Australian friends, neighbours and fellow countrymen? You clearly despise them. If you had a farm, you'd be fenced, ploughed, planted and irrigated by the one known as he. You.

Let's see what has prompted your impotent little fit of pique, paki cameleer:


The government argues the companies, which raise revenue from Australian advertisers, have an obligation to support Australians' ability to access quality news content.

Facebook, Google to be hit with tax in push to fund news
The government wants to impose a new tax to push the tech platforms to make funding agreements with news organisations.


But the CCIA calls the proposal a "coercive and discriminatory tax that requires US technology companies to subsidise Australian media companies".

"Currently, the two companies targeted by the law pay $AU250 million annually through deals that were coerced through the threat of this law," the submission says.

"However, with the threat of the new 'incentive' tax from the Australian government (rate yet to be determined), this cost is likely to significantly increase."

The association also complains about proposed local content quotas for American streaming services. The quotas would force companies like Netflix to fund Australian productions, similar to rules imposed on traditional TV networks.

"Australia's online video streaming market is estimated to generate up to $2.3 billion ($3.7 billion) of annual revenue, with the majority of it earned from US companies," the CCIA submission says.

"If the Australian government pursues the 20 per cent expenditure mandate it has floated in the past year, that would put this revenue at risk."

The federal government announced plans to impose local content quotas on streaming services more than two years ago. But it has more recently backed away from the idea amid questions over how it would fit with the Australia-US free trade agreement.

The CCIA, which advocates for open trade, does not argue for new tariffs on Australia. But it suggests they could be used as a bargaining tool.







Ah! So an interest group made a submission and cameelpiss paki is feeling farmed instanto.

Frank wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 4:12pm:

FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 3:59pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 2:10pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:40pm: America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit. Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA). How is that  a problem ? Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks. If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;) Why should the person you so dismissively refer to as "Trump" care about an ally with a free trade agreement? I could provide you with the answer of every US prez since Roosevelt, dear, but a question first if I may: Why would you care about your Australian friends, neighbours and fellow countrymen? You clearly despise them. If you had a farm, you'd be fenced, ploughed, planted and irrigated by the one known as he. You. Let's see what has prompted your impotent little fit of pique, paki cameleer: The government argues the companies, which raise revenue from Australian advertisers, have an obligation to support Australians' ability to access quality news content. Facebook, Google to be hit with tax in push to fund news The government wants to impose a new tax to push the tech platforms to make funding agreements with news organisations. But the CCIA calls the proposal a "coercive and discriminatory tax that requires US technology companies to subsidise Australian media companies". "Currently, the two companies targeted by the law pay $AU250 million annually through deals that were coerced through the threat of this law," the submission says. "However, with the threat of the new 'incentive' tax from the Australian government (rate yet to be determined), this cost is likely to significantly increase." The association also complains about proposed local content quotas for American streaming services. The quotas would force companies like Netflix to fund Australian productions, similar to rules imposed on traditional TV networks. "Australia's online video streaming market is estimated to generate up to $2.3 billion ($3.7 billion) of annual revenue, with the majority of it earned from US companies," the CCIA submission says. "If the Australian government pursues the 20 per cent expenditure mandate it has floated in the past year, that would put this revenue at risk." The federal government announced plans to impose local content quotas on streaming services more than two years ago. But it has more recently backed away from the idea amid questions over how it would fit with the Australia-US free trade agreement. The CCIA, which advocates for open trade, does not argue for new tariffs on Australia. But it suggests they could be used as a bargaining tool. Ah! So an interest group made a submission and cameelpiss paki is feeling farmed instanto.

Come come, you decrepit old cadaver, the owners of said corporates currently have an office in your DL's administration, across the road from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, in the Eisenhower Executive Wing, known colloquially as the Department of Government Efficiency.

They currently fund your DL directly, to the tune of at least $240mil in direct campaign funds, excluding the investment in the inaugural ball, the Trump Org's loans and any additional crypto and untraceable NFTs they sling your DL's way.

Aquascoot, a "noble Aussie hobby farmer" and lantana-picker, stands against his fellow jolly countrymen. This is, of course, his right as a citizen of our fine country. 

You, a naughty old cheese-thief, have no rights at all. Aquascoot's preferred Prime Minister, the "noble Dutto", would deport your type in a flash, but do you know?

There are those such as us who would fight to the death for your right to stay.

After all, we grew here, you flew here.

More fool us, eh?

SEND THEM BACK !!!!

Trump chose the Internet world as his support for Politics.
The Democrats stuck with the Televisual Media as it's.

Looks like the Internet is working for world politics while the Leftism of TV Media is looking more and more out of its game and more like something that should stick to Eurovision and entertainment as a comedy show. Take Comedy clown Zelensky for example.

Bye bye Leftism and Media in politics.

Bobby. wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 2:12pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 2:04pm: Bobby. wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:53pm: Hi Karnal, ever get the feeling that Trump is ploughing you? There are those fantasies again, bubbling to the surface in a moment of emotional weakness... I wonder if your Gab friends know just how much you really love Trump..? I doubt they would still like you if you openly embrace team alphabet, not that there's anything wrong with that. https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/329/892/small/f377462f0d4d3bc4.jpg https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/127/308/small/fa2723ce45f4fa00.jpg https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/109/127/330/small/92b51940ce836264.jpg

Bobbi's digging into his wank bank again.

Jasin wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 5:57pm:

Trump chose the Internet world as his support for Politics. The Democrats stuck with the Televisual Media as it's. Looks like the Internet is working for world politics while the Leftism of TV Media is looking more and more out of its game and more like something that should stick to Eurovision and entertainment as a comedy show. Take Comedy clown Zelensky for example. Bye bye Leftism and Media in politics.

It's not working too well for you, dear. Your own economy just dropped 8 to 12%, with more to follow when your DL tariffs our farmed-out hayseed friends.

Remember the words of our own "noble Scoot", who first blew the whistle on the evil Big Tech, ploughing you for your data.

Ever get the feeling you've been farmed?

FD wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 5:56pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 4:12pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 3:59pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 2:10pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:40pm: America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit. Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA). How is that  a problem ? Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks. If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;) Why should the person you so dismissively refer to as "Trump" care about an ally with a free trade agreement? I could provide you with the answer of every US prez since Roosevelt, dear, but a question first if I may: Why would you care about your Australian friends, neighbours and fellow countrymen? You clearly despise them. If you had a farm, you'd be fenced, ploughed, planted and irrigated by the one known as he. You. Let's see what has prompted your impotent little fit of pique, paki cameleer: The government argues the companies, which raise revenue from Australian advertisers, have an obligation to support Australians' ability to access quality news content. Facebook, Google to be hit with tax in push to fund news The government wants to impose a new tax to push the tech platforms to make funding agreements with news organisations. But the CCIA calls the proposal a "coercive and discriminatory tax that requires US technology companies to subsidise Australian media companies". "Currently, the two companies targeted by the law pay $AU250 million annually through deals that were coerced through the threat of this law," the submission says. "However, with the threat of the new 'incentive' tax from the Australian government (rate yet to be determined), this cost is likely to significantly increase." The association also complains about proposed local content quotas for American streaming services. The quotas would force companies like Netflix to fund Australian productions, similar to rules imposed on traditional TV networks. "Australia's online video streaming market is estimated to generate up to $2.3 billion ($3.7 billion) of annual revenue, with the majority of it earned from US companies," the CCIA submission says. "If the Australian government pursues the 20 per cent expenditure mandate it has floated in the past year, that would put this revenue at risk." The federal government announced plans to impose local content quotas on streaming services more than two years ago. But it has more recently backed away from the idea amid questions over how it would fit with the Australia-US free trade agreement. The CCIA, which advocates for open trade, does not argue for new tariffs on Australia. But it suggests they could be used as a bargaining tool. Ah! So an interest group made a submission and cameelpiss paki is feeling farmed instanto. Come come, you decrepit old cadaver,

This from your own link, grimacing old paki arse bandit. (You are probably 20 years older than me, decrepit old arse bandit. You would hhave to be if your tour of Nam is true. But you might be lying about that like you do about everything else.)

Karnal farms in Bangkok. That much is true.

Frank wrote on Mar 21^st, 2025 at 6:54pm:

FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 5:56pm: Frank wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 4:12pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 3:59pm: aquascoot wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 2:10pm: FD wrote on Mar 21st, 2025 at 1:40pm: America Inc is fucking with us. Big Pharma wants our PBS planted. Big Tech wants our social media laws ploughed. Elon, Jeff, Zuck, the lot. Turns out the big fella was with them all along. When his plan to tariff Aussie farmers comes out, you'll know. MAGA hates our guts. National sovereignty, innit. Trump as CEO of USA Pty Ltd is standing up for the shareholder  ( the citizens of the USA). How is that  a problem ? Why should Trump give a flying F about what some Australian hater thinks. If you have a problem with that maybe elect Peter Dutton who is more likely to stand up for his shareholders then a ideologically captured leftie from the Labor party or the greens  ;) Why should the person you so dismissively refer to as "Trump" care about an ally with a free trade agreement? I could provide you with the answer of every US prez since Roosevelt, dear, but a question first if I may: Why would you care about your Australian friends, neighbours and fellow countrymen? You clearly despise them. If you had a farm, you'd be fenced, ploughed, planted and irrigated by the one known as he. You. Let's see what has prompted your impotent little fit of pique, paki cameleer: The government argues the companies, which raise revenue from Australian advertisers, have an obligation to support Australians' ability to access quality news content. Facebook, Google to be hit with tax in push to fund news The government wants to impose a new tax to push the tech platforms to make funding agreements with news organisations. But the CCIA calls the proposal a "coercive and discriminatory tax that requires US technology companies to subsidise Australian media companies". "Currently, the two companies targeted by the law pay $AU250 million annually through deals that were coerced through the threat of this law," the submission says. "However, with the threat of the new 'incentive' tax from the Australian government (rate yet to be determined), this cost is likely to significantly increase." The association also complains about proposed local content quotas for American streaming services. The quotas would force companies like Netflix to fund Australian productions, similar to rules imposed on traditional TV networks. "Australia's online video streaming market is estimated to generate up to $2.3 billion ($3.7 billion) of annual revenue, with the majority of it earned from US companies," the CCIA submission says. "If the Australian government pursues the 20 per cent expenditure mandate it has floated in the past year, that would put this revenue at risk." The federal government announced plans to impose local content quotas on streaming services more than two years ago. But it has more recently backed away from the idea amid questions over how it would fit with the Australia-US free trade agreement. The CCIA, which advocates for open trade, does not argue for new tariffs on Australia. But it suggests they could be used as a bargaining tool. Ah! So an interest group made a submission and cameelpiss paki is feeling farmed instanto. Come come, you decrepit old cadaver, This from your own link, grimacing old paki arse bandit. (You are probably 20 years older than me, decrepit old arse bandit. You would hhave to be if your tour of Nam is true. But you might be lying about that like you do about everything else.)

Your fetid stench doesn't come from any links of mine, girlie. I've seen men with more guts than you disemboweled by daisy cutters.

And I've seen men with more balls on the receiving end of my SLR.