Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Aboriginal Affairs >> WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1742303554

Message started by Baronvonrort on Mar 18th, 2025 at 11:12pm

Title: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Baronvonrort on Mar 18th, 2025 at 11:12pm
One of the most important fossils found in Australia was put in hole in the ground and covered with dirt.


Quote:
Willandra Lakes Hominid 50

In 1980 the skull and some arm, hand and foot bones were found on the surface near Lake Garnpung, not far from Lake Mungo.
This skull and limb bones, the 50 th find of human remains from the Willandra region, Willandra Lakes Hominid 50 (WLH 50), is the most significant of the finds in the area.

An unusual feature of this skull is its preservation, the bone has been completely replaced by silica, the same process as opalisation. It has been said that this man is so robust he makes the Kow Swamp man look gracile, quite a statement, given that the most extreme of the Kow Swamp skulls was more robust than H erectus. The cranium is 210 mm long and very wide. The average thickness of the cranial vault bone is 16 mm. There is a continuous torus above the eyes formed by the massive brow ridges, and a flat, receding forehead. The occipital region of the skull is even more archaic than the other features, displaying substantial cranial buttressing. The width difference above and below the ears is much greater than in any modern people. Combined with these extremely archaic features is a very large brain. With an endocranial capacity of 1450 ml it is much higher than the average of 1300 mm for modern skulls.

The small amount of bone remaining gave an electron spin resonance (ESR) date of 29,000 +/- 5,000 BP, and more recently an OSL dating of 25,000 BP was measured.

There is disagreement about the connections between WLH 1 and WLH 50. Some claim it is simply not possible to have WLH 50 descended from people like WLH 1 because of the extreme difference in proportions as well as the form of the two. The skull bones of WLH 50 is 15-19 mm thick, those of WLH 1 is 2 mm thick.

Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London took detailed measurements of WLH 50 and concluded that when the size was taken into account it was of modern type, but in shape it is closer to the Skhul-Qafzeh crania than to the other Australian samples.

One feature of the cranial thickening in WLH 50 is that it differs from other modern Aboriginal People, in that whereas it is common for the modern male Aboriginal skulls to have some thickening in parts of the cranial vault, WLH 50 had it over the entire vault.

More- https://austhrutime.com/wlh-50.htm


The native grifters might not like this it does question if they really were first here

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Gnads on Mar 19th, 2025 at 11:13am

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 18th, 2025 at 11:12pm:
One of the most important fossils found in Australia was put in hole in the ground and covered with dirt.


Quote:
Willandra Lakes Hominid 50

In 1980 the skull and some arm, hand and foot bones were found on the surface near Lake Garnpung, not far from Lake Mungo.
This skull and limb bones, the 50 th find of human remains from the Willandra region, Willandra Lakes Hominid 50 (WLH 50), is the most significant of the finds in the area.

An unusual feature of this skull is its preservation, the bone has been completely replaced by silica, the same process as opalisation. It has been said that this man is so robust he makes the Kow Swamp man look gracile, quite a statement, given that the most extreme of the Kow Swamp skulls was more robust than H erectus. The cranium is 210 mm long and very wide. The average thickness of the cranial vault bone is 16 mm. There is a continuous torus above the eyes formed by the massive brow ridges, and a flat, receding forehead. The occipital region of the skull is even more archaic than the other features, displaying substantial cranial buttressing. The width difference above and below the ears is much greater than in any modern people. Combined with these extremely archaic features is a very large brain. With an endocranial capacity of 1450 ml it is much higher than the average of 1300 mm for modern skulls.

The small amount of bone remaining gave an electron spin resonance (ESR) date of 29,000 +/- 5,000 BP, and more recently an OSL dating of 25,000 BP was measured.

There is disagreement about the connections between WLH 1 and WLH 50. Some claim it is simply not possible to have WLH 50 descended from people like WLH 1 because of the extreme difference in proportions as well as the form of the two. The skull bones of WLH 50 is 15-19 mm thick, those of WLH 1 is 2 mm thick.

Chris Stringer of the Natural History Museum in London took detailed measurements of WLH 50 and concluded that when the size was taken into account it was of modern type, but in shape it is closer to the Skhul-Qafzeh crania than to the other Australian samples.

One feature of the cranial thickening in WLH 50 is that it differs from other modern Aboriginal People, in that whereas it is common for the modern male Aboriginal skulls to have some thickening in parts of the cranial vault, WLH 50 had it over the entire vault.

More- https://austhrutime.com/wlh-50.htm


The native grifters might not like this it does question if they really were first here


They'll claim it's their ancestor just like they did with Mungo Man & Mungo Woman.

It helps them claim a greater period of time occupying the continent..... even though these remains may not be of modern humans - to which Aboriginals belong.

Want to take a wager?  ;D

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Grappler Deep State Feller on Mar 19th, 2025 at 1:48pm
Well - they weren't the First Nations - they were the First Invaders .... that's the reality - time to just tell them all to STFU and get on with living today... they make foul enough weather of that already without their endless tripe.

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Baronvonrort on Mar 22nd, 2025 at 10:50pm
Source- [url]https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/media/6856[/url

The grifters want to bury evidence


wlh_50.jpg (112 KB | 15 )

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Jasin on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 8:18am
Considering there were 3 major waves of migration into this continent with substantial time between them.
The Tasmanians, who looked akin to negrotic Melanesian which would have had the highest admixture of Denisovan.

The Murrayan, the most Caucasoid looking.


The Carpentarian, the now majority with Dravidian looks.

So if Hominids were here first, they don't belong to the grifters.

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Grappler Deep State Feller on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 9:33am

Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 8:18am:
Considering there were 3 major waves of migration into this continent with substantial time between them.
The Tasmanians, who looked akin to negrotic Melanesian which would have had the highest admixture of Denisovan.

The Murrayan, the most Caucasoid looking.


The Carpentarian, the now majority with Dravidian looks.

So if Hominids were here first, they don't belong to the grifters.


Wave after wave of Invaders - took 40,00 years, until Civilisation Day 1788, to even begin to learn the genteel art of Grifting - until then it was just a knock-down, drag-em-out free-for-all over limited resources.  That's why the population never grew large enough to have much impact on the environment and produce crops and thus major settlements and such...  really, if you look at it, Grifting as a way of life has only come into vogue with them since 1967 - it's less than sixty years... and they learned fast.

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Brian Ross on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 12:11pm

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Grappler Deep State Feller on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 12:20pm

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Gnads on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 12:32pm

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 12:11pm:


Imbecilic clown

Title: Re: WLH-50, the Garnpung Giant
Post by Grappler Deep State Feller on Mar 24th, 2025 at 11:30am

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 9:33am:

Jasin wrote on Mar 23rd, 2025 at 8:18am:
Considering there were 3 major waves of migration into this continent with substantial time between them.
The Tasmanians, who looked akin to negrotic Melanesian which would have had the highest admixture of Denisovan.

The Murrayan, the most Caucasoid looking.


The Carpentarian, the now majority with Dravidian looks.

So if Hominids were here first, they don't belong to the grifters.


Wave after wave of Invaders - took 40,000 years, until Civilisation Day 1788, to even begin to learn the genteel art of Grifting - until then it was just a knock-down, drag-em-out free-for-all over limited resources.  That's why the population never grew large enough to have much impact on the environment and produce crops and thus major settlements and such...  really, if you look at it, Grifting as a way of life has only come into vogue with them since 1967 - it's less than sixty years... and they learned fast.


Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.