Now he's so confident he's making the threats himself,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10Tw_4T7xIQ

“We are the federal law.”

Chilling.

Chilling….  :D :D :D

FAFO…. Stupid looking Trans moron…


Quote:

Today the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) sent a letter to the Maine Department of Education Commissioner Pender Makin announcing that OCR is initiating a directed investigation of the Maine Department of Education (MDOE) amid allegations that it continues to allow male athletes to compete in girls’ interscholastic athletics and that it has denied female athletes female-only intimate facilities, thereby violating federal antidiscrimination law,” the DOE said in a press release. “The letter also notifies MDOE that OCR is launching an investigation into Maine School Administrative District #51 (MSAD #51), after it was reported that Greely High School, a school under its jurisdiction, is continuing to allow at least one male student to compete in girls’ categories.” Acting assistant secretary for civil rights Craig Trainor added: “Maine would have you believe that it has no choice in how it treats women and girls in athletics – that is, that it must follow its state laws and allow male athletes to compete against women and girls. Let me be clear: If Maine wants to continue to receive federal funds from the Education Department, it has to follow Title IX. If it wants to forgo federal funds and continue to trample the rights of its young female athletes, that, too, is its choice. OCR will do everything in its power to ensure taxpayers are not funding blatant civil rights violators.”

---

Trump has brought so many frivolous cases before the Courts, they ought to ban him as a vexatious litigant.

Back in the 70s, 80s, 90s, even 2000s he’d have been taken care of in the locker rooms… smacking pervert cheat


Quote:

On Monday night, a biological boy calling himself “Katie Spencer” from Greely High School in Cumberland, Maine, easily won first place in the girls’ state championship meet. Fox News reported that he outleaped every female by at least half a foot. Adding insult to injury, Spencer’s pole vault was the main reason his track and field team won the Class B state championship meet by ONE POINT. Maine GOP State Rep. Laurel Libby also revealed another outrageous fact on Facebook: “Katie Spencer” had competed as John Rydzewski in the boy’s pole vault just one year ago and won fifth place. He then started competing as a girl in June 2024.

---

ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2025 at 6:45am:

Chilling.

'However, under both the Constitution and the Impoundment Control Act, the president cannot withhold congressionally-approved funding without congressional authorization. Previous administrations have tried and failed to push similar measures, and courts have repeatedly ruled that such attempts violate both statutory and constitutional principles. Despite what the president wants us to think, this attempt is no different.'
https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/trumps-attempt-to-unilaterally-control-state-and-local-funding-is-dangerous-dumb-and-undemocratic

Big Don may fight like hell or 'seig hell'.

KreepyKang who creeps around at night handing out lollies to kids wants men to beat up little girls in the name of fairness and diversity  ;D

Maine high schooler on transgender athlete controversy, "It never should have happened."


Zoe Hutchins, a Senior attending Lawrence High School in Fairfield, said that her teammate had to compete against a transgender athlete during the Class B Indoor Track and Field State Championship.

"My friend who had to directly compete against him kept saying it's just not fair, and she is right. It is not fair, and it never should have happened," Hutchins said.
https://wgme.com/news/local/transgender-athlete-controversy-in-maine-sparks-national-debate

Zoe explained that she was a trans-teacher and felt she was qualified to be head teacher. 'I always felt wrong in a student's body and identify with top positions'. The school head has resigned and Zoe is now on a big salary at the High School.

chimera wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 1:03pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22nd, 2025 at 6:45am: Chilling. 'However, under both the Constitution and the Impoundment Control Act, the president cannot withhold congressionally-approved funding without congressional authorization. Previous administrations have tried and failed to push similar measures, and courts have repeatedly ruled that such attempts violate both statutory and constitutional principles. Despite what the president wants us to think, this attempt is no different.' https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/trumps-attempt-to-unilaterally-control-state-and-local-funding-is-dangerous-dumb-and-undemocratic Big Don may fight like hell or 'seig hell'.

Principals maybe, but not constitutional law.

That said there is nothing stopping the President from doing it. As in previous cases it would have to be decided in the courts.....after the fact.....with the United States Supreme Court the final arbiter if it gets that far, & SCOTUS agrees to hear it......and that is if/until the President orders it done the next time, where the long lists of appeals in court were finally settled.

If the President orders any allocated funds withheld it could easily spend many months going through litigation prior to any allocations.....& IMHO most would prefer out-of-court arbitration, because it probably would be faster, as opposed to months of litigation.

A law is only as good as the fortitude & strength of those willing to enforce it.

Quote:

Trump threatening a governor

He is a bully that threatens everyone. He mostly loses in court. Not much chance of winning this one either.

Gordon wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 1:11pm:

KreepyKang who creeps around at night handing out lollies to kids wants men to beat up little girls in the name of fairness and diversity  ;D

You're a piece of poo.

Dnarever wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 2:14pm:

Quote: Trump threatening a governor He is a bully that threatens everyone. He mostly loses in court. Not much chance of winning this one either.

Yes, before he became President. Regardless, if he wanted to disrupt the money from getting to where he doesn't want it to go, even if he looses, it could take many months before it is fully litigated.....& what he wanted to disrupt may have already been accomplished. https://imgur.com/6tcmHQH.gif

ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2025 at 6:45am:

Now he's so confident he's making the threats himself, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10Tw_4T7xIQ “We are the federal law.” Chilling.

Jumper, petal?  :'( :'( :'(

Looks like the anti Trump posters need a lesson on the birds and the bees.
Or do they desire unfettered access to the g\irls’ rooms?

Dnarever wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 2:14pm:

Quote: Trump threatening a governor He is a bully that threatens everyone. He mostly loses in court. Not much chance of winning this one either.

Yes, he threatens everyone but he particularly likes to bully women.

Why?

a) he's a coward, and

b) he's a misogynist

Panther wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:

Principals maybe, but not constitutional law.

'The Constitution explicitly gives Congress, not the president, the power of the purse.
Article I, Section 9, Clause 7: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law.”

Panther wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 2:06pm:

chimera wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 1:03pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22nd, 2025 at 6:45am: Chilling. 'However, under both the Constitution and the Impoundment Control Act, the president cannot withhold congressionally-approved funding without congressional authorization. Previous administrations have tried and failed to push similar measures, and courts have repeatedly ruled that such attempts violate both statutory and constitutional principles. Despite what the president wants us to think, this attempt is no different.' https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/trumps-attempt-to-unilaterally-control-state-and-local-funding-is-dangerous-dumb-and-undemocratic Big Don may fight like hell or 'seig hell'. Principals maybe, but not constitutional law. That said there is nothing stopping the President from doing it. As in previous cases it would have to be decided in the courts.....after the fact.....with the United States Supreme Court the final arbiter if it gets that far, & SCOTUS agrees to hear it......and that is if/until the President orders it done the next time, where the long lists of appeals in court were finally settled. If the President orders any allocated funds withheld it could easily spend many months going through litigation prior to any allocations.....& IMHO most would prefer out-of-court arbitration, because it probably would be faster, as opposed to months of litigation. A law is only as good as the fortitude & strength of those willing to enforce it.

Hi Panther, where does your Constitution place the issue of sport and education? Is it:

A) With the states
B) Enacted by presidential decrees
C) Too confusing

Karnal wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 4:57pm:

Panther wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm: chimera wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 1:03pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22nd, 2025 at 6:45am: Chilling. 'However, under both the Constitution and the Impoundment Control Act, the president cannot withhold congressionally-approved funding without congressional authorization. Previous administrations have tried and failed to push similar measures, and courts have repeatedly ruled that such attempts violate both statutory and constitutional principles. Despite what the president wants us to think, this attempt is no different.' https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/trumps-attempt-to-unilaterally-control-state-and-local-funding-is-dangerous-dumb-and-undemocratic Big Don may fight like hell or 'seig hell'. Principals maybe, but not constitutional law. That said there is nothing stopping the President from doing it. As in previous cases it would have to be decided in the courts.....after the fact.....with the United States Supreme Court the final arbiter if it gets that far, & SCOTUS agrees to hear it......and that is if/until the President orders it done the next time, where the long lists of appeals in court were finally settled. If the President orders any allocated funds withheld it could easily spend many months going through litigation prior to any allocations.....& IMHO most would prefer out-of-court arbitration, because it probably would be faster, as opposed to months of litigation. A law is only as good as the fortitude & strength of those willing to enforce it. Hi Panther, where does your Constitution place the issue of sport and education? Is it: A) With the states B) Enacted by presidential decrees C) Too confusing

It's about federal funding, grimacing paki.

trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line.

the left started lawfare

so they would be punk ass bitches to complain ;)

Frank wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 4:58pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 4:57pm: Panther wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 2:06pm: chimera wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 1:03pm: ProudKangaroo wrote on Feb 22nd, 2025 at 6:45am: Chilling. 'However, under both the Constitution and the Impoundment Control Act, the president cannot withhold congressionally-approved funding without congressional authorization. Previous administrations have tried and failed to push similar measures, and courts have repeatedly ruled that such attempts violate both statutory and constitutional principles. Despite what the president wants us to think, this attempt is no different.' https://www.aclu.org/news/civil-liberties/trumps-attempt-to-unilaterally-control-state-and-local-funding-is-dangerous-dumb-and-undemocratic Big Don may fight like hell or 'seig hell'. Principals maybe, but not constitutional law. That said there is nothing stopping the President from doing it. As in previous cases it would have to be decided in the courts.....after the fact.....with the United States Supreme Court the final arbiter if it gets that far, & SCOTUS agrees to hear it......and that is if/until the President orders it done the next time, where the long lists of appeals in court were finally settled. If the President orders any allocated funds withheld it could easily spend many months going through litigation prior to any allocations.....& IMHO most would prefer out-of-court arbitration, because it probably would be faster, as opposed to months of litigation. A law is only as good as the fortitude & strength of those willing to enforce it. Hi Panther, where does your Constitution place the issue of sport and education? Is it: A) With the states B) Enacted by presidential decrees C) Too confusing It's about federal funding, grimacing paki.

Oh? So why does the Maine governor keep referencing state anti discrimination legislation, you ridiculous old cadaver?

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 5:00pm:

trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line.

And here you have it, leftards. The first confession of full-blown fascism.

Thanks, Aquascoot, it's good to have everybody on the same page, dear.

The old boy will be joining you forthwith. After a few limpwristed attempts at obfuscation, he'll come clean too, I can assure you.

It's taken us a few years, but we got there in the end, no?

Karnal wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 5:48pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 5:00pm: trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line. And here you have it, leftards. The first confession of full-blown fascism. Thanks, Aquascoot, it's good to have everybody on the same page, dear. The old boy will be joining you forthwith. After a few limpwristed attempts at obfuscation, he'll come clean too, I can assure you. It's taken us a few years, but we got there in the end, no?

the people have spoken

donny had 34 charges brought against him under lawfare.

the people voted in donny so he would be free and so he could repay the left.

corrupt biden pardoned everyone he could think of at 11.30 before the midday handover of power.

donny must be so sick of winning

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 5:00pm:

trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line.

He has the fire power to hang Pence, come after you and open Russia's gulag prisons.

chimera wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 6:12pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 5:00pm: trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line. He has the fire power to hang Pence, come after you and open Russia's gulag prisons.

he may just be the most powerful man to have ever lived.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 5:00pm:

trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line. the left started lawfare so they would be punk ass bitches to complain ;)

Rule of law.
The punkass bitches don't like it when it is turned on them.

THEN the rule of law is fascism.


Punkass bitches IS the mot just.  Punkass paki bitches. There is a satisfying ring to that.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 6:48pm:

he may just be the most powerful man to have ever lived.

One opinion is that he's a child although 'man' is also an explanation.

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 5:55pm:

Karnal wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 5:48pm: aquascoot wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 5:00pm: trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line. And here you have it, leftards. The first confession of full-blown fascism. Thanks, Aquascoot, it's good to have everybody on the same page, dear. The old boy will be joining you forthwith. After a few limpwristed attempts at obfuscation, he'll come clean too, I can assure you. It's taken us a few years, but we got there in the end, no? the people have spoken donny had 34 charges brought against him under lawfare. the people voted in donny so he would be free and so he could repay the left. corrupt biden pardoned everyone he could think of at 11.30 before the midday handover of power. donny must be so sick of winning

You're out now, Aquascoot. We always knew what you were up to, dear. Your fawning over the "noble Vlad" was revolting enough, but now we have the program in your own words: threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line.

Just think, nobody made you say that, you came up with it all on your own. You grew up in nice, peaceful Australia too - no wars, no depressions, just Sky News on the box first thing in the morning. It just goes to show how dormant the fascist mindset is. You don't even have to be a goose-stepper or Jew-hater. Scary, no?

Just think, if a comfy retiree in sunny old Queensland can turn Nazi, who else? Here we all were thinking fascism is so unAustralian. Our grandparents lived through WWI and the depression, then fought another war to defeat fascism. They were fervent believers in democracy. They never would have imagined their grandkids giving Nazi salutes and threatening to lock up anyone who stands in the way.

But we could, and we can, so now we know.

Civilisation has its discontents, no?

SIEG HEIL !!!

Frank wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 7:02pm:

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23rd, 2025 at 5:00pm: trump has a mandate to threaten and lock up anyone who steps out of line. the left started lawfare so they would be punk ass bitches to complain ;) Rule of law. The punkass bitches don't like it when it is turned on them. THEN the rule of law is fascism. Punkass bitches IS the mot just.  Punkass paki bitches. There is a satisfying ring to that.

Maine has a law, dear. Your DL is ordering a governor to break state law.

And not only. He's publicly threatening to withdraw federal taxes Maine residents paid and telling their governor he'll end her political career.

How's that for backroom diplomacy? Art of the deal, is it?

You gave up rule of law long ago, dear boy, so stop faking. The jig's up, as every schoolboy knows.

VENGEANCE !!!

aquascoot wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2025 at 6:48pm:

he may just be the most powerful man to have ever lived.

Now you're talking. He speaks in front of the largest navy and airforce there ever was. Governors surrender when those engines start up.