Indigenous elders to fight ‘death sentence’ nuclear policy

The New Daily
Jun 21, 2024




Indigenous elders are vowing to fight plans to build nuclear power plants across Australia, warning the development will be a “death sentence” for their connection to country.   :(

The opposition has pledged to build seven nuclear plants at the sites of coal-fired power stations if it wins the next federal election.


While no costings have been provided, the Coalition has promised to provide more detail before voters go to the polls.

Energy experts have cast doubt on the timeline provided by Opposition Leader Peter Dutton on how quickly the nuclear plants can be built.

They have also questioned whether the proposed sites are geologically suitable for nuclear technology.

One of the sites earmarked for a nuclear plant, Tarong in Queensland, is on Indigenous elder Aunty Jannine Smith’s country.

“Over my dead body. I will be in a tent outside Tarong gates,” she said.

“It’s a death sentence to that land.

“It’s not happening. I can guarantee you now it will not happen at Tarong.”


Smith said building a nuclear plant at Tarong would be “severing the connection to that sacred site of ours”.


“We are the custodians of the land, the land is our mother and we don’t own our mother, we care for her,” she said.

Queensland Conservation Council’s Paul Spearim said “white Australia has a short-sighted approach to country”.

He pointed to Maralinga and Emu Field in South Australia, where the British held nuclear tests. More than 1000 Indigenous people were exposed to radiation from the tests.

“You have forced poison onto the lands of traditional owners, and now Peter Dutton is proposing to create poisons that would last [hundreds of thousands] of years,” Spearim said.   :(

“We have learnt that white Australia cannot be trusted with nuclear power, and you continue to act without care for our sacred country.

“We will fight these poisons, they are not welcome, and we will fight against proposals to force them upon us.”

The Climate Council said Dutton’s nuclear scheme would unleash more climate pollution and more fires, floods and storms.

“It’s that simple. It’s a scheme to delay the momentum that’s already building for clean energy and, instead, just let things burn,” it wrote in a post on X.

Other sites where the Coalition wants to build nuclear plants are Loy Yang Power Station in Victoria, Callide in Queensland, Mount Piper at Lithgow in central-west NSW and Liddell in NSW’s Hunter region.

Small, modular reactors would be built at Northern Power Station in Port Augusta and at Muja Power Station, south-east of Perth.   :(

Millions of solar panels - no disconnection with country... thousands of huge windmills - no disconnection with country ... seven mushroom farms - total disconnection with country.

Usual thinking ..... this sounds politically motivated to me.... Suk Din (Gunga's cousin) to the belief that Labor is their friend.... in all things...

Bribery works!!!   New name Bribery Island....

Elder woman has no problem with coal-fired power stations on 'her' land. But nuclear energy being cleaner is a problem for her. And then there is the citation of Maralinga nuclear testing. The nuclear power stations are not going to be exploding. And it is not their decision to make.

UnSubRocky wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2024 at 7:12pm:

Elder woman has no problem with coal-fired power stations on 'her' land. But nuclear energy being cleaner is a problem for her. And then there is the citation of Maralinga nuclear testing. The nuclear power stations are not going to be exploding. And it is not their decision to make.

Pretty much what I thought.

As noted above, no problem with coal, gas, solar, wind.....but nuclear?....Anyhow, a society that had 60,000 years to develop and yet could not invent the wheel is not the go to authority on nuclear power.  ::)

The largest uranium mine and mineral resources deposit is at Olympic Dam in South Australia. Greek tribals own the Olympics. They burn a torch and send the flaming stuff down under Uranus.

Belgarion wrote on Jun 22^nd, 2024 at 7:48pm:

As noted above, no problem with coal, gas, solar, wind.....but nuclear?....Anyhow, a society that had 60,000 years to develop and yet could not invent the wheel is not the go to authority on nuclear power.  ::)

That was the thinking I had. All these claims of a spiritual connection to the land. But, if a politician proposes to make an alternative energy source that reduces the carbon footprint, nuclear energy is frowned upon by these freeloaders.

This 'article' -- that does not have a source link -- is probably just a ploy by the Labor ministers to provoke "white guilt" among the voters. Virtue signaling indigenous people has lost its appeal many years ago. Australians own Australia, not just the 3.8% that claim to have an ancestry dating back tens of thousands of years.

There a couple of links.
https://www.aap.com.au/news/nuclear-policy-a-death-sentence-for-indigenous-land/#:~:text=One%20of%20the%20sites%20earmarked,death%20sentence%20to%20that%20land.
Coal and uranium both originate Aboriginally.

https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/radioactivity-sav.pdf

'If you lived within 50 miles of a nuclear power plant, you would receive an average radiation dose of about 0.01 millirem per year.'  1 mSv = 100 mrem, average background is 2.3 mSv.