Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Environment >> Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1715162517

Message started by Jasin on May 8th, 2024 at 8:01pm

Title: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Jasin on May 8th, 2024 at 8:01pm
Interesting geological history on Tasmania - which is geologically more associated with Arizona (N.America) and Antarctica than the continent of Australia.

If there's any reason why Tasmania should be its own separate Nation, then here's another.


https://youtu.be/_f_Hcyfv5rU

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Bobby. on May 8th, 2024 at 8:29pm
Amazing video - I never knew that.

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Jasin on May 8th, 2024 at 8:34pm
Nor did I. I thought it was 'always' part of the Australian continent - but no. It is its own 'country' and geological identity. If Tassie goes independent as a separate nation - they could call the land NUNA after the billion+ supercontinent it was born from.

Here's a weird looking guy giving a different Tas view.
https://youtu.be/2KPnNyCVxPs

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Jasin on May 8th, 2024 at 9:02pm
Those Roaring 40's would bring a lot of Radiation across the country if Nuclear War erupted. Even if most of the blasts were in the northern hemisphere. Eventually the Radiation would make its way south and Tassie would be fried. The inbreds there with 6 fingers would have even more mutations.

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Bobby. on May 8th, 2024 at 9:05pm

Jasin wrote on May 8th, 2024 at 9:02pm:
Those Roaring 40's would bring a lot of Radiation across the country if Nuclear War erupted. Even if most of the blasts were in the northern hemisphere. Eventually the Radiation would make its way south and Tassie would be fried. The inbreds there with 6 fingers would have even more mutations.



Shhh - don't tell Monk.

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Jasin on May 8th, 2024 at 9:30pm
It's goon-night from Monk.  ;D

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Dnarever on May 9th, 2024 at 12:17am
So it has only been there for about 500 million years.

There are some real scary implications in these processes when you consider that progressive plate moves could have moved Tasmania from the north pole to the bottom of Australie which was at that time in the northern hemisphere.

Title: Re: Tasmania: Not a part of Australia
Post by Jasin on May 9th, 2024 at 3:48am
Yep. Add another 'billion' years from before Pangaea (which is the supercontinent that reformed from the parts that broke up from the supercontinent Nuno long before) and 'Tasmania' was still there. Tasmania (or what is left of it) is very 'old' indeed.

There are parts of the world, where the land hasn't been subducted down into the mantle. The north-eastern part of Western Australia (Pilbara) is considered 'the oldest unchanged' land on the planet with an Hadean-Archean Era of 4.5 BILLION years old.

Hence why we 'mine' the oldest land, like we chop down the oldest forests. Can't have them existing anymore, eh?

Here's an informative clip on the dates/dating.
https://youtu.be/L76mti4OVC0

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.