:D

In the middle of a trial where she is accusing someone else of racism....

Mehreen Faruqi v Pauline Hanson: Greens senator tells court attacks on white people not racist

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/apr/29/mehreen-faruqi-v-pauline-hanson-greens-senator-tells-court-attacks-on-white-people-not-racist

Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi has told the federal court that verbal attacks on white people in Australia are not racist because racism is “tied to power” and in this country, “the power.. is held by white people”.

freediver wrote on Apr 30^th, 2024 at 7:57am:

Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi has told the federal court that verbal attacks on white people in Australia are not racist because racism is “tied to power” and in this country, “the power.. is held by white people”

How would the Judge adjudicate on that one?

The Judge would have to say: "In the event that coloured people held the power in this country, one could reasonable assume that the roles would be reversed, and therefore coloured people could be called racist by white people ... I find the accuser guilty of divisiveness and lacking common sense. I also find her to be guilty of assuming she has less power than white people when she herself is holding a seat in the Senate. The accuser must pay all court costs"

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 30^th, 2024 at 11:55am:

freediver wrote on Apr 30th, 2024 at 7:57am: Greens senator Mehreen Faruqi has told the federal court that verbal attacks on white people in Australia are not racist because racism is “tied to power” and in this country, “the power.. is held by white people” How would the Judge adjudicate on that one? The Judge would have to say: "In the event that coloured people held the power in this country, one could reasonable assume that the roles would be reversed, and therefore coloured people could be called racist by white people ... I find the accuser guilty of divisiveness and lacking common sense. I also find her to be guilty of assuming she has less power than white people when she herself is holding a seat in the Senate. The accuser must pay all court costs"

Insh'allah....

The Madness .... The Madness....

You don't actually expect sense from a 'court' these days, do you?  Courts these days are nothing more than an extension of the way out political philosophy and platform of the government of the day - appointed to be in their pockets, same as public service top levels are contracted to be in their pockets - and thus only capable and desirous of rendering a result to suit the government of the day.

Look at the Bruce Decision - a landmark and watershed - Aussie, in the case where rape was a hanging offence, would convict his own son instantly without a hearing on the basis of a drunken memory conveniently recalled far later and for which all available corroborative evidence has been destroyed largely at the hands of the plaintiff - and would then frog-march said son to the scaffold.

So Aussie says... but we all know what a liar he is .....

Bruce Is Innocent!

So you should be expecting that His Honour Judge S'Offtkok will find absolute validity in the ravings of The Mad Paki Musso sheila promoted instantly way above her capabilities in this Poor Fellow, My Country.

And The Civil War moves one step closer... either The Madness stops now or it will erupt, one way or another.....Now then - those Land Enclosure Acts .... private hunting reserves and lodges and spiritual retreats for the New Aristocracy, lands allocated to the Lords without payment for their own free use and for the exclusion of all the commonry (poachers will be hung on the razor wire) ..... they who are being enabled, by false governments, to impose their supremacy on all others and exclude them from free use of common land in their own country.

This can never end well.

The Madness..................... The Madness ......................

A 22-year-old black student has accused police and prosecutors of misusing hate speech laws intended to protect minorities after she was charged for using the N-word in a tweet.

Jamila A, who lives in London, was charged under the Communications Act 2003 in July 2023 after referring to the black Newcastle United footballer Alexander Isak as a “black person” in a tweet.

Her legal team argued the term was widely used in African American vernacular English and black British English and differed significantly from the racial slur ending in “-er”.
...

Jamila told the Guardian she had been prosecuted for speaking in a way “that came naturally to me as a black woman”.

“Everyone was so angry on my behalf: my mum, my siblings, my friends … They just thought it was outrageous because, of all the people they could prosecute for saying the N-word, they chose another black person.”

She added: “I can go outside right now … and there’d be a million people who listen to rap songs that have the N-word in there and they sing along to it but nothing will ever happen to them, but they will get you, a black person, for saying the N-word in your language.”






Farcical. There shouldn't be such idiotic language policing.

A black person calling a black person a black person is not a racial slur. Only a non-black person calling a black person a black person is.
Who whom, as Lenin said. Not everyone can call a spade a spade. Only another spade can.

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/8528/trQvAo.jpg

Racism is not just from a position of cultural power, but also from the poor as Muslim racism is to dominate as the 'outbreeder' of other races. That is, Muslim children first, before others. They're probably teaching their kids to harass, bully, gang up on in numbers and attack isolated white kids with emotional 'racism' abuse as well.
Outbreed the whities and force them to flee via violence.

It seems to work by the look of the major cities these days.
Poor whites can't compete. While the rich ones are all homosexuals with little white fluffy dogs as children.
You only have to look at the poor white suburbs where all the single white mothers have darkie kids from Mussos, Polynesians, Abos and Indians.

It’s as if they are trying to “project “ racist comments towards white peoples are totally acceptable.

Racism goes both ways!

The great green dream …everyone is a victim!

Even labor is on record for calling them totally stupid.

And that’s there best Allie!

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 25^th, 2025 at 5:35pm:

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/8528/trQvAo.jpg

Which black majority country you prefer to live in, nappy shitter?

Which black majority countries do blacks prefer to live in, in preference to England, Europe, North America, Australia - ie white countries?

Blacks are fleeing other blacks for white countries.
Whites are not fleeing whites to black countries.
Why is that?

WACISM!!!

Frank wrote on Mar 25^th, 2025 at 4:56pm:

A black person calling a black person a black person is not a racial slur. Only a non-black person calling a black person a black person is. Who whom, as Lenin said. Not everyone can call a spade a spade. Only another spade can.

Not how I see it, calling someone the n word is racist, it does not matter what color the person is, the actual act of calling someone the n word is the crime. If a crime is decided by the color of the person then that law would be racist.

Bigotry, racism, misogyny etc - all are subject to whatever hysterical idea is holding sway among those who practice those dark arts that ream their souls and seek to impose darkness on all around them...

WGAF what the 'greens' define 'racism' as?

SCENARIO #1.....
If a white Australian man rapes an Aboriginal woman/girl,
that would be a serious crime, .......AND IDENTIFIED AS A RACIST ACT.

SCENARIO #2.....
But if a Aboriginal man raped an Aboriginal woman/girl, today,
it would be a serious crime, .......AND IT WOULD BE A RACIST ACT......TO SPEAK ABOUT IT.


'Truth Telling'......is when Aboriginal grievances against white Australia are publicised.

But when grievances against Aboriginal men are publicised, it is........

"Shhhhh !!!!...."

because that is    the WRONG KIND    of 'truth telling'.

It is not 'useful' truth telling,   ....when 'a white fella' does it like that.



The sensibilities of SOME indigenous people, dictate that 'Truth telling' should only work one direction !

sensibility = = the ability to appreciate and respond to complex emotional or aesthetic influences; sensitivity.      a person’s tendency to be offended or shocked.


.



Quote:

Report into missing and murdered First Nations women 2024-Aug-15 A two-year inquiry into missing and murdered First Nations women will report to Federal parliament today. The inquiry heard repeatedly that government authorities and law enforcement either dismissed or didn't follow up on cases of missing or murdered first nations people. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people make up 20 per cent of homicide victims in Australia despite representing only 3.8 per cent of the population and first nations women are over-represented in hospital admissions resulting from family violence.

https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/worldtoday/report-into-missing-and-murdered-first-nations-women/104228928


Q.
Was it, will it be, discovered and announced......
who murdered and who 'disappeared', all [or many] of these indigenous women and children ?


Q.
What    .....was 'missing', from the inquiry's findings ?

What was     .....the principle 'thing' which was missing, at the inquiry ?

Was it 'wholesome' 'Truth Telling',      ....which was missing ?
.....'Truth Telling' about the likely identity,
of those who were the murderers, ....of the missing indigenous women and children ?



wholesome = = conducive to or suggestive of good health and physical well-being.
conducive to or promoting moral well-being.

Frank wrote on Mar 25^th, 2025 at 10:14pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Mar 25th, 2025 at 5:35pm: https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/8528/trQvAo.jpg Which black majority country you prefer to live in, nappy shitter? Which black majority countries do blacks prefer to live in, in preference to England, Europe, North America, Australia - ie white countries? Blacks are fleeing other blacks for white countries. Whites are not fleeing whites to black countries. Why is that? WACISM!!!

Jasmine Crockett Says She Was Just Criticizing GOP Policies When She Called Gov. Abbott 'Honky Boy In The Wheelchair Whose Legs Don't Work No More'

https://media.babylonbee.com/articles/67e4294eeb1d067e4294eeb1d1.jpg


U.S. — Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett is under fire for comments made during a banquet in Los Angeles where she referred to Texas Governor Greg Abbott as "that honkey boy in the wheelchair whose legs don't work no more." However, Crockett states that her words are being twisted, as she was only blasting GOP policies.

"I was only criticizing Republican tax policies when I called him 'Captain Wheelchair McCripple,'" Rep. Crockett clarified. "Besides, he likes the name. I mean, look at him. He has no legs."

While speaking at the event, Crockett also referred to Abbot as Governor Micro Machines, Speed Racer, and Professor Charles Xavier.

Governor Greg Abbott hit back at Crockett for the perceived slight. "Why someone would insult another human being at a Human Rights Campaign event, of all places, is beyond me," he said. "I am a human! Don't let the wheelchair confuse you."

Washington Democrats were quick to defend Crockett's words, arguing they should be taken as an allegory for how the GOP is crippling the American people. "She's black," said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. "It's impossible for her to insult a white paraplegic like Governor Furiosa."

At publishing time, Jasmine Crockett denied ever knowing "Optimus Roller Wheels."

According to John Smith, if they deny being a racist, it just proves they are racist.

Regarding the n word, “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” has been removed from some US libraries and Harriet Beecher Stowe thus declared racist