This is the first time i've tried to attach an image. Hope this works:

---

It could only be a slogan in a country without bears.

Bears kill their own cubs.

Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears.

It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age.

If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons.

Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 7:42pm:

It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age.

Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor.

I've read and tried to understand the argument here but every time it sounds like some high school girls claiming a win for something smelling like red herring.

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 7:47pm:

If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image.

Your wife doesn't get to pick what man.

Thanks for the tip.

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:16pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip.

You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh?

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:08pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor.

Righto, then...

When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live.

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:18pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh?

It's not my question.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:18pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live.

Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear.

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:24pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear.

I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:25pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up.

You sound like an example of why many women would pick the bear.

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:27pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. You sound like an example of why many women would pick the bear.

As opposed to being eaten alive from the c~nt up?

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:23pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh? It's not my question.

Then you don't get to pick what are valid answers, yeah? Who decides what my wife gets to pick? The (X)Twitter sisterhood?

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:33pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:23pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh? It's not my question. Then you don't get to pick what are valid answers, yeah? Who decides what my wife gets to pick? The (X)Twitter sisterhood?

More reasons to pick the bear.

Hi Mothra,
learn how to resize pictures  - ( width=336 height=503 -  inside the brackets for this one is good)

https://www.ozpolitic.com/album/forum-attachments/438221225_1111158720189402_1018878011739409854_n.jpg

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:28pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:27pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. You sound like an example of why many women would pick the bear. As opposed to being eaten alive from the c~nt up?

By your own compulsive regurgitation of "facts about bears", you disclose that bears are not always dangerous.

See how when you think about something other than simply react, as you two are doing, you can actually get someway towards understanding other people's motives for their decisions?

Or you could just imagine a woman being eaten from the "c~nt up" again. That seems to give you a little thrill. And about your pay-grade.

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:38pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:23pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh? It's not my question. Then you don't get to pick what are valid answers, yeah? Who decides what my wife gets to pick? The (X)Twitter sisterhood? More reasons to pick the bear.

More reasons? Can you start at the beginning for me?

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:43pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:38pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:23pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh? It's not my question. Then you don't get to pick what are valid answers, yeah? Who decides what my wife gets to pick? The (X)Twitter sisterhood? More reasons to pick the bear. More reasons? Can you start at the beginning for me?

I don't think that would help you.

Ask your wife. See if that works.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:25pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up.

I don't think that's warranted, do you?

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:46pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:43pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:38pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:23pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:16pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:47pm: If my wife asked me that and I did have a daughter the answer would have been an immediate "a man, me". Probably the same answer if she asked about one of my sons. Try scaling the image down a little, 250W x 400H should be about right for that image. Your wife doesn't get to pick what man. Thanks for the tip. You need to have your questionnaire reworded then, eh? It's not my question. Then you don't get to pick what are valid answers, yeah? Who decides what my wife gets to pick? The (X)Twitter sisterhood? More reasons to pick the bear. More reasons? Can you start at the beginning for me? I don't think that would help you. Ask your wife. See if that works.

Had our 40th anniversary almost 2 weeks ago. I think I know what works.

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:49pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. I don't think that's warranted, do you?

Bears tend not to be too polite when they're ripping people apart.

Is there a better way to highlight the difference between humans and bears other than graphically?

Women who think they'd rather take their chances with bears should watch 'Grizzly Man'. Apparently, his girlfriend tried to escape the bears by climbing a tree. A bear climbed the tree and dismembered her on the way down.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:55pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:49pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. I don't think that's warranted, do you? Bears tend not to be too polite when they're ripping people apart. Is there a better way to highlight the difference between humans and bears other than graphically? Women who think they'd rather take their chances with bears should watch 'Grizzly Man'. Apparently, his girlfriend tried to escape the bears by climbing a tree. A bear climbed the tree and dismembered her on the way down.

How do you know they weren't eaten from the arse up?

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:59pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:55pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:49pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. I don't think that's warranted, do you? Bears tend not to be too polite when they're ripping people apart. Is there a better way to highlight the difference between humans and bears other than graphically? Women who think they'd rather take their chances with bears should watch 'Grizzly Man'. Apparently, his girlfriend tried to escape the bears by climbing a tree. A bear climbed the tree and dismembered her on the way down. How do you know they weren't eaten from the arse up?

Well, if you're more comfortable with the image of being eaten from the arse up...

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 9:09pm:

Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:59pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:55pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:49pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. I don't think that's warranted, do you? Bears tend not to be too polite when they're ripping people apart. Is there a better way to highlight the difference between humans and bears other than graphically? Women who think they'd rather take their chances with bears should watch 'Grizzly Man'. Apparently, his girlfriend tried to escape the bears by climbing a tree. A bear climbed the tree and dismembered her on the way down. How do you know they weren't eaten from the arse up? Well, if you're more comfortable with the image of being eaten from the arse up...

Probs be my family jewels up if I was climbing a tree. I fear that'd be the low hanging fruit.

Setanta wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 9:20pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 9:09pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:59pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:55pm: Setanta wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:49pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. I don't think that's warranted, do you? Bears tend not to be too polite when they're ripping people apart. Is there a better way to highlight the difference between humans and bears other than graphically? Women who think they'd rather take their chances with bears should watch 'Grizzly Man'. Apparently, his girlfriend tried to escape the bears by climbing a tree. A bear climbed the tree and dismembered her on the way down. How do you know they weren't eaten from the arse up? Well, if you're more comfortable with the image of being eaten from the arse up... Probs be my family jewels up if I was climbing a tree. I fear that'd be the low hanging fruit.

You could try reversing up the tree I guess, like an Indian Dhole dog!

mothra wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 8:42pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:28pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:27pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. You sound like an example of why many women would pick the bear. As opposed to being eaten alive from the c~nt up? By your own compulsive regurgitation of "facts about bears", you disclose that bears are not always dangerous. See how when you think about something other than simply react, as you two are doing, you can actually get someway towards understanding other people's motives for their decisions? Or you could just imagine a woman being eaten from the "c~nt up" again. That seems to give you a little thrill. And about your pay-grade.

Bears are intelligent and territorial. They're at their most dangerous in late Autumn and early Spring, but they'd kill humans anytime they're hungry enough.

It's only urban blue-hairs women and ham-twatted late-tenners who'd choose to hang out with bears than human males.

Let's see them refuse help from a human male if they were chased by bears.

An Indian bear?

https://www.dw.com/en/sexual-violence-in-india-is-rape-becoming-normalized/a-68443032

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27^th, 2024 at 9:46pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:42pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:28pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:27pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:25pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:24pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:18pm: mothra wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 8:08pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 27th, 2024 at 7:42pm: It could only be a slogan in a country without bears. Bears kill their own cubs. Before hibernation and after, bears will kill and eat anything that moves, including other bears. It was the short-faced bear that restricted the mass migration of humans into North America at the end of the last ice age. Bears don;t hibernate. They go into torpor. Righto, then... When bears eat their prey, they usually don't bother to kill it first. They eat it live. Yet ...some women, knowing this as it's not especially arcane despite you congratulating yourself for knowing it ... some women will still pick the bear. I hope that gives them consolation as they're eaten alive from the c~nt up. You sound like an example of why many women would pick the bear. As opposed to being eaten alive from the c~nt up? By your own compulsive regurgitation of "facts about bears", you disclose that bears are not always dangerous. See how when you think about something other than simply react, as you two are doing, you can actually get someway towards understanding other people's motives for their decisions? Or you could just imagine a woman being eaten from the "c~nt up" again. That seems to give you a little thrill. And about your pay-grade. Bears are intelligent and territorial. They're at their most dangerous in late Autumn and early Spring, but they'd kill humans anytime they're hungry enough. It's only urban blue-hairs women and ham-twatted late-tenners who'd choose to hang out with bears than human males. Let's see them refuse help from a human male if they were chased by bears.

I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds. 

Most men would choose a Bear over a Woman.
You can eat a bear, skin it for warm fur, use its teeth and claws. A woman? Well what use is that out there in the woods? ::) Bear would eat a woman like it eats Beaver.

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:18am:

I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.

No, it didn't.

A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction.

The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men.

Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:40am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing.

Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:43am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you

I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid.

The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you.

I'm guessing you're a cretin for getting yet another thing wrong.  And most bear encounters do not end up with the bear trying to kill you,  no matter how much you pretend otherwise. 

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:47am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you.

Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing?

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:53am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. I'm guessing you're a cretin for getting yet another thing wrong.  And most bear encounters do not end up with the bear trying to kill you,  no matter how much you pretend otherwise.

All bear encounters are potentially lethal, hence all those warnings in US and Canadian wildlife parks.

Are you potentially lethal towards your wife/partner?

Are you worse than a bear?

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:54am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing?

Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:56am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:53am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. I'm guessing you're a cretin for getting yet another thing wrong.  And most bear encounters do not end up with the bear trying to kill you,  no matter how much you pretend otherwise.  All bear encounters are potentially lethal, hence all those warnings in US and Canadian wildlife parks. Are you potentially lethal towards your wife/partner? Are you worse than a bear?

Are you arguing that men aren't potentially lethal  :D :D

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:59am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:56am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:53am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. I'm guessing you're a cretin for getting yet another thing wrong.  And most bear encounters do not end up with the bear trying to kill you,  no matter how much you pretend otherwise.  All bear encounters are potentially lethal, hence all those warnings in US and Canadian wildlife parks. Are you potentially lethal towards your wife/partner? Are you worse than a bear? Are you arguing that men aren't potentially lethal  :D :D

Can you give me an example of when you'd attack/kill a woman? When you're hungry, maybe?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 10:58am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:54am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman?

This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species.

I asked you a very simple question: Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing?

The answer is 'yes'.

A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer.

Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman?

Could a woman scare away a bear?  Could they scare away a man?

Has the penny dropped yet?

The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her.

A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more.

I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear.

Actually it's a really simple answer to all but the average WOKE Imbecile current society lets parade around masquerading as someone of knowledge. Of the 3 possibilities available (Man, Woman, Bear); the most likely chance of your child surviving in the woods, finding their way, being protected from evident possible bear attacks and making it back home safely, is that child being cared for and protected by a man.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    " DID you know children are more likely to be harmed by their biological mother than father? Neither did I until very recently. But why am I surprised — and why will you be shocked? Because we don’t talk about it.
No one wants to talk about it. Society is totally in denial that women aren’t always victims.

We have all been conditioned to believe the majority of people who commit abuse are men — but it’s not true.

There are good women and bad women. Children are far more likely to suffer neglect or abuse at the hands of their mothers.

It’s so important that we all put aside our preconceptions and look at the facts, even though they’re uncomfortable.

Families mourn lost kids in Cairns after the stabbing of 8 children. Source: Supplied
Families mourn lost kids in Cairns after the stabbing of 8 children. Source: Supplied
Statistics show a different story from the one we are accustomed to

Data from Child Protective Services in the US, mirrors the pattern around the world. Of children who become victims of maltreatment, the huge majority of perpetrators of the crimes are the biological parents (not adopted or foster parents, as you might think).

The Child Family Community Australia reports, “A British retrospective prevalence study of 2669 young adults aged 18-24 (May-Chahal & Cawson, 2005) found that mothers were more likely than fathers to be responsible for physical abuse 49 per cent of incidents compared to 40 per cent).”

Other sites that are trying to raise awareness in this area will bombard you with statistics. Breaking the silence, for instance, says 71 per cent of children killed by one parent are killed by their mothers, 60 per cent of those victims are boys.

Talking child abuse statistics
A report by Australian Institute of Family Studies released in October 2016 found, “boys were more likely to be the subjects of a substantiation of physical abuse, neglect or emotional abuse than girls.”

DHHS data in the UK shows that of children abused by one parent between 2001 and 2006, 70.6 per cent were abused by their mothers, 29.4 per cent were abused by their fathers.

You don’t have to drown in statistics to see reality. You only have to read news headlines that, sadly, are all around us.

The truth about violence is that it has more connection to morality than gender. And, not all women are natural caretakers."                                                                                                            https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/kids/why-arent-we-talking-about-abusive-mums/news-story/629b48b93abd22be2b63f1344c0c5de6

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:01am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:59am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:56am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:53am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. I'm guessing you're a cretin for getting yet another thing wrong.  And most bear encounters do not end up with the bear trying to kill you,  no matter how much you pretend otherwise.  All bear encounters are potentially lethal, hence all those warnings in US and Canadian wildlife parks. Are you potentially lethal towards your wife/partner? Are you worse than a bear? Are you arguing that men aren't potentially lethal  :D :D Can you give me an example of when you'd attack/kill a woman? When you're hungry, maybe?

i wouldn't,  but no woman had ever chosen a bear over me. Is that why you're so butt hurt over this? Did some woman say she preferred a bear to you?
You show me the last case of a woman being eaten by a bear, anywhere in the world,  and we'll compare that to the hundreds of cases of women killed by men in Australia.  If you like, we'll make it so you give me $100 for every case i find, I'll give you $1000 for every case of a woman eaten by a bear that you find. We'll limit it to the last decade as I don't want to force you to sell your house to pay up.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:05am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:58am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:54am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman? This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species. I asked you a very simple question: Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? The answer is 'yes'. A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer. Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman? Could a woman scare away a bear?  Could they scare away a man? Has the penny dropped yet? The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her. A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more. I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear.

How many men do you know rape and torture women?

Bears are capable of half-eating a victim leaving them barely alive...

Would these blue-hairs use a shark analogy in Australia? Probably not... Shark stories are well-known in Australia... Bear stories are not.

Goose wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:06am:

Actually it's a really simple answer to all but the average WOKE Imbecile current society lets parade around masquerading as someone of knowledge. Of the 3 possibilities available (Man, Woman, Bear); the most likely chance of your child surviving in the woods, finding their way home and being protected from evident possible bear attacks and making it back home safely, is that child being cared for and protected by a man.

Exactly

And how many women would not take their chances with help from a man if they were being chased by bears?

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:09am:

Quote: Can you give me an example of when you'd attack/kill a woman? When you're hungry, maybe? i wouldn't,  but no woman had ever chosen a bear over me. Is that why you're so butt hurt over this? Did some woman say she preferred a bear to you? You show me the last case of a woman being eaten by a bear, anywhere in the world,  and we'll compare that to the hundreds of cases of women killed by men in Australia.  If you like, we'll make it so you give me $100 for every case i find, I'll give you $1000 for every case of a woman eaten by a bear that you find. We'll limit it to the last decade as I don't want to force you to sell your house to pay up.

Not many women are eaten by bears because almost no women living in bear country is stupid enough to buy into the blue-hairs bullshit that they'd be safer with a bear than a man.

Their chances of dying from a bear attack would quickly rise to 100% were they blue-hairs enough to trust a bear.

And, of course, you wouldn't hurt a woman and neither would your friends... And yet...

Quote:

And how many women would not take their chances with help from a man if they were being chased by bears

You not only missed the point of the OP, but you're on a totally different planet to the point  :D :D :D

I think we'll mark Ecky down as representative of the last paragraph of the OP:

---

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:21am:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:09am: Quote: Can you give me an example of when you'd attack/kill a woman? When you're hungry, maybe? i wouldn't,  but no woman had ever chosen a bear over me. Is that why you're so butt hurt over this? Did some woman say she preferred a bear to you? You show me the last case of a woman being eaten by a bear, anywhere in the world,  and we'll compare that to the hundreds of cases of women killed by men in Australia.  If you like, we'll make it so you give me $100 for every case i find, I'll give you $1000 for every case of a woman eaten by a bear that you find. We'll limit it to the last decade as I don't want to force you to sell your house to pay up. Not many women are eaten by bears because almost no women living in bear country are stupid enough to buy into the blue-hairs bullshit that they'd be safer with a bear than a man. Their chances of dying from a bear attack would quickly rise to 100% were they blue-hairs enough to trust a bear. And, of course, you wouldn't hurt a woman and neither would your friends... And yet...

So you ran away from your comments about potential lethal,  and now your running from your comments about bears eating women.  By the way both my wife and my sister have encountered wild bears when hiking, and the bears never tried to eat any of them, ever.

You should quit while you're behind.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:25am:

I think we'll mark Ecky down as representative of the last paragraph of the OP:

He seems to have taken it quite personally hasn't he. I hope his wife is safe.

Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears.

Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it.

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:27am:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:25am: I think we'll mark Ecky down as representative of the last paragraph of the OP: He seems to have taken it quite personally hasn't he. I hope his wife is safe.

It's quite something, isn't it? Well, can't say we weren't warned.

What a weak backtrack attempt from Mothra. The majority of all humans know what was implied in the question. Typically disingenuous.

Goose wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:35am:

What a weak backtrack attempt from Mothra. The majority of all humans know what was implied in the question. Typically disingenuous.

Backtrack? The question (not mine) said "bear".

The post then went on to say when asked regarding his teenage daughter, a man went on to question "what kind of man .."what kind of bear" ....  but when the man was replaced with "woman", the questions immediately stopped and a prompt answer was given. "Woman".

Having a little overreact too are you Goose?

The post containing the question, posted by You, is your property Mothra and everyone reading knows that lol. Everyone whom is genuine in their consideration of your post understands the realities and implication of the excerpt You posted and the thread You started.

Goose wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:45am:

The post containing the question, posted by You, is your property Mothra and everyone reading knows that lol. Everyone whom is genuine in their consideration of your post understands the realities and implication of the excerpt You posted and the thread You started.

So well do i know it, Goose, that i was able to correct you about what it actually entailed when you ridiculously accused me a "backtracking".

Lo and behold, it was all there in the OP all along.

Shall we mark you down as be representative of the last paragraph also? I think so.

LOL. You mean simply observing your own true nature. Why are you getting so worked up Mothra?. It's a misandrist construct and genuine people know and acknowledge that reality. You apparently support that sort of division. Some underlying issues of your own evidently!

Goose wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:56am:

LOL. You mean simply observing your own true nature. Why are you getting so worked up Mothra?. It's a misandrist construct and genuine people know and acknowledge that reality. You apparently support that sort of division. Some underlying issues of your own evidently!

Oh it's definitely not me getting worked up.

I'm finding the entire thread fascinating.

And the last paragraph of the OP is certainly holding water on Ozpol.

What you mean by creating a misandrist construct and then furthering your own apparent underlying misandrist tendencies by attempting to hurt the very men it targets and call it for what it is. So you're that individual?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Geeze FD!!, Two minutes to load and save a reply, WTF!

https://c.tenor.com/3MBb9OcZK-IAAAAd/tenor.gif

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:29am:

Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it.

Sun bears not dangerous, eh!

Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story.

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:26am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:21am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:09am: Quote: Can you give me an example of when you'd attack/kill a woman? When you're hungry, maybe? i wouldn't,  but no woman had ever chosen a bear over me. Is that why you're so butt hurt over this? Did some woman say she preferred a bear to you? You show me the last case of a woman being eaten by a bear, anywhere in the world,  and we'll compare that to the hundreds of cases of women killed by men in Australia.  If you like, we'll make it so you give me $100 for every case i find, I'll give you $1000 for every case of a woman eaten by a bear that you find. We'll limit it to the last decade as I don't want to force you to sell your house to pay up. Not many women are eaten by bears because almost no women living in bear country are stupid enough to buy into the blue-hairs bullshit that they'd be safer with a bear than a man. Their chances of dying from a bear attack would quickly rise to 100% were they blue-hairs enough to trust a bear. And, of course, you wouldn't hurt a woman and neither would your friends... And yet... So you ran away from your comments about potential lethal,  and now your running from your comments about bears eating women.  By the way both my wife and my sister have encountered wild bears when hiking, and the bears never tried to eat any of them, ever. You should quit while you're behind.

Well, of course, you claimed you're not potentially lethal to women and, I'd bet you'd argue none of your family or friends are... Just 'others'... Always 'others'...

How many men have raped or bashed your wife or sister?

Did they stick to the tracks and avoid interaction with bears as US and Canadian wildlife services warn, or did they do a 'Grizzly Man'?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 12:33pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:29am: Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it. Sun bears not dangerous, eh! Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story.

What do you know? You thought bears hibernated.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 12:38pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:29am: Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it. Sun bears not dangerous, eh! Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story. What do you know? You thought bears hibernated.

I know someone who went to work in a bear sanctuary who was mauled by a sun bear. Lucky for her the bear was toothless and clawless.

Remember the OP is apparently not the brightest spark, even when trying to appear otherwise. The OP is a Misandrist construct and everyone of genuine intelligence knows that. Pretending it is something else to back-track away from that truth and hide that misandrist reality, whilst actually having an IQ too low to fully process the failure to succeed in that aim is an interesting byproduct to observe.

Remember the OP is apparently not the brightest spark, even when trying to appear otherwise. The OP is a Misandrist construct and everyone of genuine intelligence knows that. Pretending it is something else to back-track away from that truth and hide that misandrist reality, whilst actually having an IQ too low to fully process the failure to succeed in that aim is an interesting byproduct to observe.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:29am:

Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it.

Amazing when blue-hairs try to pass off hysterical hyperbole as a philosophical consideration.

I guess you'll be wandering through saltwater croc territory next Summer cos, y'know, it's safer than going to a male-dominated sports arena.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 12:43pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:38pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:29am: Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it. Sun bears not dangerous, eh! Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story. What do you know? You thought bears hibernated. I know someone who went to work in a bear sanctuary who was mauled by a sun bear. Lucky for her the bear was toothless and clawless.

Do you know what the word "necessarily" means?

Flip

Wondering if Canadian and American women are swarming bear country today unarmed looking for bears to hang out with...

Probably not happening, I'm guessing.

Flip

Whatever floats your boat mothra. You're a dingbat at the best of times

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:14pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:43pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:38pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:29am: Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it. Sun bears not dangerous, eh! Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story. What do you know? You thought bears hibernated. I know someone who went to work in a bear sanctuary who was mauled by a sun bear. Lucky for her the bear was toothless and clawless. Do you know what the word "necessarily" means?

Not all grizzlies are necessarily dangerous every single time you encounter one when, say, they're well-fed and tired.

But would you sleep next to one? Grizzly man and his girlfriend did... They pulled out their body parts from the bears the rangers had to shoot to protect other humans... even female humans.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 11:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:05am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:58am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:54am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman? This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species. I asked you a very simple question: Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? The answer is 'yes'. A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer. Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman? Could a woman scare away a bear?  Could they scare away a man? Has the penny dropped yet? The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her. A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more. I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear. How many men do you know rape and torture women?

You're missing the point.  Sooooooooooooo missing the point.

It's about the capabilities of the human male as a species versus the capabilities of a bear as a species.

Quote:

Well, of course, you claimed you're not potentially lethal to women and

Did I? Or are you confused again? You're the one pretending men aren't potentially lethal.


Quote:

How many men have raped or bashed your wife or sister?

I know multiple women who have been raped or bashed as well as a one who was murderedby her partner.  Why? Is there a point to your stupidity,  if so, when do you plan on getting to it?



Quote:

Did they stick to the tracks and avoid interaction with bears as US and Canadian wildlife services warn, or did they do a 'Grizzly Man'

?

No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are.

Your next straw grasp please?

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:21pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:14pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:43pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:38pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 12:33pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:29am: Like men, not all bears are necessarily dangerous. Panda bears ..sun bears ... moon bears. Amazing the things we think of when we consider a philosophical question rather than simply overreacting to it. Sun bears not dangerous, eh! Another 'dingos ain't dangerous' story. What do you know? You thought bears hibernated. I know someone who went to work in a bear sanctuary who was mauled by a sun bear. Lucky for her the bear was toothless and clawless. Do you know what the word "necessarily" means? Not all grizzlies are necessarily dangerous every single time you encounter one when, say, they're well-fed and tired. But would you sleep next to one? Grizzly man and his girlfriend did... They pulled out their body parts from the bears the rangers had to shoot to protect other humans... even female humans.

Oh my god. You've progressed.

Now do try to keep thinking.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:29pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:05am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:58am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:54am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman? This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species. I asked you a very simple question: Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? The answer is 'yes'. A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer. Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman? Could a woman scare away a bear?  Could they scare away a man? Has the penny dropped yet? The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her. A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more. I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear. How many men do you know rape and torture women? You're missing the point.  Sooooooooooooo missing the point. It's about the capabilities of the human male as a species versus the capabilities of a bear as a species.

No, the authors chose bears in comparison to men as a ridiculous hyperbole. Of course they knew bear encounters are dangerous, that's why they used it.

They could have used crocs or sharks but, in Australia, the hyperbole wouldn't have worked.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:29pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 11:05am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:58am: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:54am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:47am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:43am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:40am: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 10:18am: I think mothras post went so far over your head that it's in the clouds.  No, it didn't. A similar point could be made about men preferring a dog over a woman if the man is referring to a woman's capacity for reputation destruction. The point would have been better made if the woman referred to preferring, say, cats over men. Using the bear analogy is a blue-hairs, ham twot thing. Sure you missed the point.  That you think a cat would have been a better analogy shows you have no idea what the point was. Let me know if you need to have it explained to you I'm, guessing you're a wife-basher to see the analogy as valid. The vast majority of men are not violent towards women. All wild bears will eventually attack/kill you. Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? Have you got it in you to maul or kill a woman? This is not about a particular man or a particular bear - it's about men and bears in general, and what they are capable of as a species. I asked you a very simple question: Is that the worst a bear is capable of - mauling and/or killing? The answer is 'yes'. A bear will not rape or torture. They won't tie a woman up and devise evil ways to make her suffer. Now ask yourself: is a man capable of raping and/or torturing a woman? Could a woman scare away a bear?  Could they scare away a man? Has the penny dropped yet? The very worst a bear can do to a woman is maul and kill her. A man, on the other hand, can do that and much more. I perfectly understand why women are choosing the bear. How many men do you know rape and torture women? You're missing the point.  Sooooooooooooo missing the point. It's about the capabilities of the human male as a species versus the capabilities of a bear as a species.

Indeed. Who one feels more likely risk from.

Anyone seen Cocaine Bear?

It's hilarious   ;D

Really, give it a go - I was pleasantly surprised.

It only gets 5.9/10 on IMDB, which I think is a bit unfair.

.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:35pm:

Anyone seen Cocaine Bear? It's hilarious   ;D Really, give it a go - I was pleasantly surprised. It only gets 5.9/10 on IMDB, which I think is a bit unfair.

I've seen it offered but wrote it off as ridiculous.

So bad it's good or just surprisingly better than one would expect?

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:35pm: Anyone seen Cocaine Bear? It's hilarious   ;D Really, give it a go - I was pleasantly surprised. It only gets 5.9/10 on IMDB, which I think is a bit unfair. I've seen it offered but wrote it off as ridiculous. So bad it's good or just surprisingly better than one would expect?

Strangely enough, a bit of both   :-/

It's a good bit of fun, and it has a great cast including Ray Liotta, Margo Martindale, and Jesse Tyler Ferguson.

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:29pm:

No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are.

So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then.

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:44pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:40pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:35pm: Anyone seen Cocaine Bear? It's hilarious   ;D Really, give it a go - I was pleasantly surprised. It only gets 5.9/10 on IMDB, which I think is a bit unfair. I've seen it offered but wrote it off as ridiculous. So bad it's good or just surprisingly better than one would expect? Strangely enough, a bit of both   :-/ It's a good bit of fun, and it has a great cast including Ray Liotta, Margo Martindale, and Jesse Tyler Ferguson.

Ok, i'll check i'll check it out with the fam tonight. Let you know what we reckon.

Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia.

"I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters"

"I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes"

I'm guessing there won't be.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:46pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then.

What are you, slow? I already told you they've encountered bears.


Quote:

They could have used crocs or sharks but, in Australia, the hyperbole wouldn't have worked.

The OP didn't originate in Australia dumbarse. 

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:54pm:

Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be.

Those are not equatable scenarios.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:46pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then.

Kept their distance, did they? Or did they run up and try to give them a cuddle?

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:58pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:54pm: Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be. Those are not equatable scenarios.

Why would that be? They're all apex predators.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:02pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:54pm: Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be. Those are not equatable scenarios. Why would that be? They're all apex predators.

Because nobody has suggested the woods are "infested" with bears.

One bear. Of indeterminate species. In the woods.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:07pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:02pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:54pm: Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be. Those are not equatable scenarios. Why would that be? They're all apex predators. Because nobody has suggested the woods are "infested" with bears. One bear. Of indeterminate species. In the woods.

Maybe an old blind bear with three legs, then...

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:11pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:07pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:02pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:54pm: Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be. Those are not equatable scenarios. Why would that be? They're all apex predators. Because nobody has suggested the woods are "infested" with bears. One bear. Of indeterminate species. In the woods. Maybe an old blind bear with three legs, then...

From one extreme to the other ... bypassing all points of logic.

I was hopeful for a moment there. You appeared to have an actual revelation. Alas, no cigar.

What do you think muslim men are ... men or bears?

Flip

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:17pm:

What do you think muslim men are ... men or bears?

LMAO! Of course you understand the hypothetical when your own prejudices are applied.

You and Gordy.

Not where i was going at all ..promise.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:16pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote Today at 2:11pm: mothra wrote Today at 2:07pm: MeisterEckhart wrote Today at 2:02pm: mothra wrote Today at 1:58pm: MeisterEckhart wrote Today at 1:54pm: Let's see if there's a shark/croc hyperbole used in Australia. "I'd rather swim in shark-infested waters" "I'd rather camp near croc-infested waterholes" I'm guessing there won't be. Those are not equatable scenarios. Why would that be? They're all apex predators. Because nobody has suggested the woods are "infested" with bears. One bear. Of indeterminate species. In the woods. Maybe an old blind bear with three legs, then... From one extreme to the other ... bypassing all points of logic.

Just highlighting the stupidity of the hyperbolic hysteria... As you did by specifying 'One bear. Of indeterminate species'.

I think you've quite the nerve accusing anyone else of hyperbole in this thread, Ecky.

I can't believe such a simple hypothetical question has turned into such a clusterbugger.

It's hilarious   ;D

greggerypeccary wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:24pm:

I can't believe such a simple hypothetical question has turned into such a clusterbugger. It's hilarious   ;D

Last paragraph of the OP. Predicted.

But indeed hilarious.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:23pm:

I think you've quite the nerve accusing anyone else of hyperbole in this thread, Ecky.

So now we're at "I'd rather be with a tame and timid bear than with a man".

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:31pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:23pm: I think you've quite the nerve accusing anyone else of hyperbole in this thread, Ecky. So now we're at "I'd rather be with a tame and timid bear than with a man".

You're really not doing very well at this.

At no point have i stated my preference.

Yet more hyperbole. Just to consolidate my point.

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:34pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:31pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:23pm: I think you've quite the nerve accusing anyone else of hyperbole in this thread, Ecky. So now we're at "I'd rather be with a tame and timid bear than with a man". You're really not doing very well at this. At no point have i stated my preference. Yet more hyperbole. Just to consolidate my point.

You're a blue-hairs, stupid hyperbole is where you live...

As you've stated, it's about a specific bear in specific circumstances... apparently!

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 1:59pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:46pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then. Kept their distance, did they? Or did they run up and try to give them a cuddle?

There was no need for you to cement your stupidity. 

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:53pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:59pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:46pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then. Kept their distance, did they? Or did they run up and try to give them a cuddle? There was no need for you to cement your stupidity.

So they kept their distance, then. Of course they did.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 3:40pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:53pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:59pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:46pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then. Kept their distance, did they? Or did they run up and try to give them a cuddle? There was no need for you to cement your stupidity.  So they kept their distance, then. Of course they did.

You can't possibly be that stupid

Can you show anywhere in the OP where it was suggested anyone hug a bear?

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 3:55pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 3:40pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:53pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:59pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:46pm: John Smith wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 1:29pm: No, one was walking along a creek and the other camping,  and i doubt either have a clue what US/Canadian guidelines are. So they didn't encounter and hang out with wild bears, then. Kept their distance, did they? Or did they run up and try to give them a cuddle? There was no need for you to cement your stupidity.  So they kept their distance, then. Of course they did. You can't possibly be that stupid Can you show anywhere in the OP where it was suggested anyone hug a bear?

So it's now, "I'd rather be within safe proximity of a bear (unless it's tame, timid and/or old) with a can of bear repellent and a gun, than with a man".

Quote:

So it's now, "I'd rather be within safe proximity of a bear (unless it's tame, timid and/or old) with a can of bear repellent and a gun, than with a man".

No, it's exactly the scenario described in the OP. No hugging bears, no sleeping with them. Only what's in the OP. If you don't understand what it says ask someone to explain it to you. 

mothra wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:19pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:17pm: What do you think muslim men are ... men or bears? LMAO! Of course you understand the hypothetical when your own prejudices are applied. You and Gordy. Not where i was going at all ..promise.

Where were you today? Did you join one of the "Stop violence against women" protests?

If you didn't, you're a slacker

Flip

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 2:44pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:34pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:31pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:23pm: I think you've quite the nerve accusing anyone else of hyperbole in this thread, Ecky. So now we're at "I'd rather be with a tame and timid bear than with a man". You're really not doing very well at this. At no point have i stated my preference. Yet more hyperbole. Just to consolidate my point. You're a blue-hairs, stupid hyperbole is where you live... As you've stated, it's about a specific bear in specific circumstances... apparently!

Aren't you sick of being wrong? I mean honestly, i'm left gobsmacked at how a person could be so wrong.

It's most certainly not about a specific bear, quite the contrary. I never said anything even approximating that. What is wrong with you? It was you raving about specific bears, eating uppity women from the c~nt up.

It's a bear or a man. Pick one.

The OP goes on to say that the husband of the woman addressing the question to him in regards to who he would prefer his teenage daughter to be left along in the woods withimmediately responded with "which sort of man?" ... ""which sort of bear?".

And yet when he was asked about a woman or a bear, he immediately said "woman".

Now, for the casual observer, this tells us something. For you however, well you rant pointlessly about blue hair and women needing to be rescued by a man from being eaten from the c~nt up by a starving grizzly.

Can you see yet where you went wrong?

No?  Didn't think so.

But just in case i needed to point it out again ... also from the OP:

---

John Smith wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 4:06pm:

Quote: So it's now, "I'd rather be within safe proximity of a bear (unless it's tame, timid and/or old) with a can of bear repellent and a gun, than with a man". No, it's exactly the scenario described in the OP. No hugging bears, no sleeping with them. Only what's in the OP. If you don't understand what it says ask someone to explain it to you.

He most certainly needs someone to explain it to him. I've honestly never personally witnessed someone go off on such ridiculous and aggressive tangents from simply being posed with the example of other people being posed with a philosophical question.

Were it not for that last paragraph, i'd be lost for words.

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28^th, 2024 at 7:01pm:

mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:19pm: Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:17pm: What do you think muslim men are ... men or bears? LMAO! Of course you understand the hypothetical when your own prejudices are applied. You and Gordy. Not where i was going at all ..promise. Where were you today? Did you join one of the "Stop violence against women" protests? If you didn't, you're a slacker

Not only was i there, but so was my husband, daughter and son. And my daughter's partner. And most of my friends.

mothra wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 12:46am:

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 7:01pm: mothra wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:19pm: Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 28th, 2024 at 2:17pm: What do you think muslim men are ... men or bears? LMAO! Of course you understand the hypothetical when your own prejudices are applied. You and Gordy. Not where i was going at all ..promise. Where were you today? Did you join one of the "Stop violence against women" protests? If you didn't, you're a slacker Not only was i there, but so was my husband, daughter and son. And my daughter's partner. And most of my friends.

Good for you, but you know very little will get done don't you?

There must be no bail, at all, for the creeps who potentially might harm women

And jail terms must be doubled, with no parole whatsoever

Above all, red flags are to be followed up early, and women kept clear of the creeps once it's established things could get worse for them



i

Jesus, the page eventually turned ... only after a full pages worth had been filled.

So we are now on post 2 of a new page not showing ... waiting to fill this page up before it shows.

If that's not absolute bullshitm i don't know what is.

Maybe if Fleadriver paid a bit more attention to the technicalities of his forum rather than simply trolling his members, we wouldn't have to wait full minutes to find out our posts son;t show up anyway.

mothra wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 1:08am:

Jesus, the page eventually turned ... only after a full pages worth had been filled. So we are now on post 2 of a new page not showing ... waiting to fill this page up before it shows. If that's not absolute bullshitm i don't know what is. Maybe if Fleadriver paid a bit more attention to the technicalities of his forum rather than simply trolling his members, we wouldn't have to wait full minutes to find out our posts son;t show up anyway.

Have a whinge why dontcha

Aside from the killer nature of the bear, is its universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence.

Given that blue-hairs and ham-twots tend to prefer the company of effeminate men, it’s less of a wonder what they’re really saying by their preference for bears over ‘men’.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 5:36am:

Aside from the killer nature of the bear, is its universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence. Given that blue-hairs and ham-twots tend to prefer the company of effeminate men, it’s less of a wonder what they’re really saying by their preference for bears over ‘men’.

Is that how you're justifying your stupidity now? By telling yourself that any man who questioned who the man was, was effeminate?

;D ;D ;D

In light of the bear's universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence, it's little wonder why bears were referenced, as opposed to other apex predators, such as crocs, sharks, or even snakes.

;D ;D ;D

If they'd referenced snakes, crocs or sharks you'd be crying why didn't they use bears.  :D :D :D

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 6:33am:

In light of the bear's universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence, it's little wonder why bears were referenced, as opposed to other apex predators, such as crocs, sharks, or even snakes.

The blue hairs are telling us that what they really want are men who are strong, courageous, resilient, persistent and intelligent... the opposite of their male friends of choice.

I'm betting on the bear.

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 7:35am:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29th, 2024 at 6:33am: In light of the bear's universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence, it's little wonder why bears were referenced, as opposed to other apex predators, such as crocs, sharks, or even snakes. The blue hairs are telling us that what they really want are men who are strong, courageous, resilient, persistent and intelligent... the opposite of their male friends of choice.

Women don't like you, do they. And you're furious about it.

Perhaps a community of fellow incels would be more to your liking?

Man or bear?

https://i.etsystatic.com/26968608/r/il/4bda37/2838255792/il_1588xN.2838255792_glq2.jpg

Or both? :-/

Would a Man choose to be with a Beaver in the wild, or a Woman?
It's a simple question with a simple answer.
The Beaver.

mothra wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 5:43pm:

MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29th, 2024 at 7:35am: MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 29th, 2024 at 6:33am: In light of the bear's universal status in human cultures as a symbol of strength, courage, resilience, persistence and intelligence, it's little wonder why bears were referenced, as opposed to other apex predators, such as crocs, sharks, or even snakes. The blue hairs are telling us that what they really want are men who are strong, courageous, resilient, persistent and intelligent... the opposite of their male friends of choice. Women don't like you, do they. And you're furious about it. Perhaps a community of fellow incels would be more to your liking?

You're a blue hairs, so you'll need to define what you mean by woman.

Jasin wrote on Apr 29^th, 2024 at 10:56pm:

Would a Man choose to be with a Beaver in the wild, or a Woman? It's a simple question with a simple answer. The Beaver.

If you're going to play the same game on similar terms as the OP, the question to a man would be something like:

'Where would you place your trust, in a woman or a dog?'

If a man had a shot gun in the woods, and a big bear was chasing a woman ... who would the woman choose then?

Bias_2012 wrote on Apr 30^th, 2024 at 10:11am:

If a man had a shot gun in the woods, and a big bear was chasing a woman ... who would the woman choose then?

If a shot gun is fired in the woods and the bear isn't around to hear it, does it make a sound?

Peccary was once mistaken for a white rabbit by a Bear in America. Peccary survived the ordeal, but he was left with skid marks.