Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Coronavirus >> The COVID Vaccine Study
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1709004531

Message started by MeisterEckhart on Feb 27th, 2024 at 1:28pm

Title: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 27th, 2024 at 1:28pm
The study included 99 million people, 183 million vaccine doses, looking at Astra, Moderna and Pfizer, from 8 countries including Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Scotland, Denmark, Finland, France and Argentina.

And the ABC's Dr Norman Swan stumbles...

Swan refers only to one extremely rare side effect - Guillain-Barre syndrome which affected only 7 from the study.

He glosses over incidences of heart disease.

Normally confident, Swan sounds and appears hesitant and uncertain as he limps his way through the interviews, aided and abetted by sympathetic interviewers.

The fallout from this has only just begun.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_bjzWUkVknQ

https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/radionational-breakfast/health-with-dr-norman-swan-covid-vaccine-side-effects-study-/103510350

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 27th, 2024 at 2:36pm
It's noteworthy that Norman Swan neglected to mention that Scotland was one of the countries that provided vaccine injury data.

England does not have its own Parliament - the English are represented by the UK Parliament.

Scotland does.

This means that the UK Parliament is at odds with the Scottish Parliament in terms of transparency and the volunteering of COVID vaccine injury information.

That would be worthy of reporting, but somehow Swan and the ABC are letting that slide.

Why is that?": Is it because the UK Parliament refuses even to debate the issues of vaccine injury and excess deaths?

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by aquascoot on Feb 27th, 2024 at 3:47pm
interesting the qld supreme court today found that vaccine mandates for police and teachers were unlawful and has opened the route to compensation

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by AusGeoff on Feb 27th, 2024 at 4:43pm

  Department of Health and Aged Care, 2 November 2023:



The implication that the Australian government does not publicly
disclose COVID vaccine adverse effects is erroneous, and shows
a lack of due diligence by anyone proposing that.




Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 27th, 2024 at 5:26pm

AusGeoff wrote on Feb 27th, 2024 at 4:43pm:
  Department of Health and Aged Care, 2 November 2023:

[]https://i.postimg.cc/HsfBNN1y/Screenshot-2024-02-27-at-17-36-41-COVID-19-vaccine-safety-report-02-11-23.png[]

The implication that the Australian government does not publicly
disclose COVID vaccine adverse effects is erroneous, and shows
a lack of due diligence by anyone proposing that.

What implication?

Australia was part of the COVID vaccine injury study.

Unlike the UK where its Parliament will have to deal with the fact that Scotland took part in the study.

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by MeisterEckhart on Feb 27th, 2024 at 5:30pm
With all Australian COVID-era premiers and its Prime Minister now gone from the scene - either by being voted out or resigning because, y'know, they're 'tired' or they 'don't have enough gas in the tank' - it'll be the respective states senior medicos who will be left explaining the 'dead baby' as vaccine injury enquiries and analyses increase.

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by Frank on Mar 29th, 2024 at 3:56pm
Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures

In this article, based on these circumstances and the volume of evidence that has recently come to light, we call the attention of medical professionals to the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines, and we make proposals regarding specific tests, testing methods, and regulations to deal with these risks. We expect that this proposal will serve as a basis for discussion on how to address post-vaccination syndrome and its consequences following these genetic vaccination programs.
https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202403.0881/v1

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by Sophia on Apr 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm
My son’s in-laws got COVID again last week. They’ve had numerous COVID boosters.
Before Xmas his mum in law got COVID and ended up in hospital.
We had COVID once and once only over 2 years ago  (no COVID vax)

I was wondering… are COVID vax boosters still available and still being administered and… how many can a person have and how often?

Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by Baronvonrort on Apr 18th, 2024 at 8:47pm

Sophia wrote on Apr 18th, 2024 at 8:40pm:
My son’s in-laws got COVID again last week. They’ve had numerous COVID boosters.
Before Xmas his mum in law got COVID and ended up in hospital.
We had COVID once and once only over 2 years ago  (no COVID vax)

I was wondering… are COVID vax boosters still available and still being administered and… how many can a person have and how often?


TGA website says not recommended for healthy kids under 17. I guess the risk of myocarditis outweighs any benefit.
https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/getting-your-vaccination/booster-doses#:~:text=18%2D64%20years,Can%20receive%20every%2012%20months.

A fun fact-
Since people have stopped getting boosters the evolution of new variants has slowed down.




Title: Re: The COVID Vaccine Study
Post by Frank on Apr 19th, 2024 at 12:06pm
Take politics out of science.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kd99uVOMWEk

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.