Quote:

Weather and temperatures vary in ways that are difficult to explain and predict precisely. In this article we review data on temperature variations in the past as well possible reasons for these variations. Subsequently, we review key properties of global climate models and statistical analyses conducted by others on the ability of the global climate models to track historical temperatures. These tests show that standard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperatures. Finally, we update and extend previous statistical analysis of temperature data (Dagsvik et al., 2020). Using theoretical arguments and statistical tests we find, as in Dagsvik et al. (2020), that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be strong enough to cause systematic changes in the temperature fluctuations during the last 200 years

https://www.ssb.no/en/natur-og-miljo/forurensning-og-klima/artikler/to-what-extent-are-temperature-levels-changing-due-to-greenhouse-gas-emissions/_/attachment/inline/5a3f4a9b-3bc3-4988-9579-9fea82944264:f63064594b9225f9d7dc458b0b70a646baec3339/DP1007.pdf

In other words - Models do not do correlation well and correlation is not causation. ::)

Then it must be the work of the Gods no?
C'mon! ::)

Quote:

Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years

With the Milankovitch Cycle turning down?

The paper is a statistical wank, not original research. Seems to work to a predetermined conclusion.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 3:37pm:

The paper is a statistical wank, not original research.

So statistics are only good when it comes to AGW. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

And put out by the Norwegian Government. ::)

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2023 at 3:28pm:

With the Milankovitch Cycle turning down?

Really?

https://youtu.be/eB3DJtQZVsw