| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Coronavirus >> AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1687745631 Message started by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:13pm |
|
|
Title: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:13pm
https://canberraweekly.com.au/astrazeneca-no-longer-an-approved-covid-19-vaccine/
It was announced on the Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care that from 20 March 2023 “Vaxzevria (AstraZeneca) is no longer available as an approved COVID-19 vaccine” Do you guys know about this?? While the Department of Health maintains that “COVID-19 vaccines are safe and save lives”, they also list several side effects from the jabs. Along with TTS, myocarditis (inflammation of the heart) and pericarditis (inflammation of the membrane around the heart) are also listed as *rare complications from the AstraZeneca vaccine. *If these side effects are so freaking rare then why is the vaccine no longer approved you lying pricks? 14 million doses later! God knows how many Aussies have been affected! Idiots! |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Bobby. on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:17pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:13pm:
No - and I had 3 jabs of AstraZeneca. it says: According to the latest safety report from the Therapeutic Goods of Australia (TGA), “to March 19 2023, just under 14 million doses of Vaxzervria (AstraZeneca) have been administered in Australia.” The safety report also states that there have been 48,721 adverse event reports from the AstraZeneca jab out of a total of 137,970. The Pfizer shot has 81,298 adverse event reports from over 44 million doses. The Moderna vaccine has 7,477 adverse events from more than five million doses. The Novavax jab has 990 adverse events from 247,000 doses. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:23pm
Out of curiosity ... apart from Bobby who else has had the AstraZeneca vaccine?
|
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:36pm Bobby. wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:17pm:
Reports. Just reports. Anybody can make a report. e.g. someone gets the jab then three days later gets a headache and they report it. There is no proof whatsoever that the headache was caused by the jab, but it still gets recorded on the register of adverse events. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Bobby. on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:50pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:36pm:
There have been 30,000 excess deaths in Australia - I wonder how many were from the vax? |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:02pm
Greggary how nice of you to drop by (it gives your other ids a bit of a break lol).
How many AstraZeneca vaccine shots have YOU had? |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:12pm
Dear God the idiots knew there was a problem way back in 2021 ffs!
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-24/us-regulator-flags-outdated-data-in-astrazeneca-trial/100025590 US health officials say AstraZeneca may have included 'outdated information' in coronavirus vaccine trial AstraZeneca may have included "outdated information" in touting the effectiveness of its COVID-19 vaccine in a US study, federal health officials have said, in an unusual public rift that could further erode confidence in the shot. In response, AstraZeneca said that it was working on more up-to-date information and that the more recent findings were consistent with its initial announcement that the vaccine offered strong protection. It promised an update within 48 hours. In an extraordinary rebuke, just hours after AstraZeneca announced its vaccine worked well in the US study, an independent panel overseeing the study scolded the company for cherry-picking data, according to a senior US administration official. 2 words come to mind after reading the articles I’ve provided links to: CLASS ACTION |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:23pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:02pm:
None. But I wouldn't be worried in the slightest if I had. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Bobby. on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:23pm
Hi Lisa,
I preferred AZ because it didn't use the untested mRNA technology. It used the old fashioned 40 year old technology Adenovirus. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:24pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:12pm:
Yes. "may have" |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:28pm Bobby. wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:50pm:
20,000 Most because of COVID and associated problems. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:34pm Bobby. wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:23pm:
Ahh yes! I forgot about that! Some people based their decision re which vaccine was right for them on trusted/tested technology. This is now going back a few years. And so much has happened since then 😩 I recall how frightened I was by the risks of any Covid19 vaccine given I have deep vein thrombosis and a congenital heart disorder (hole in my heart) so I held back altogether until my doctors gave me the go ahead. They never did. They gave me an exemption instead because I guess they didn’t want to take the risk of losing me as one of their patients (it’s not good for their professional indemnity insurance premiums). What a truly shocking time we’ve all been through. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:37pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:23pm:
Well I would be worried. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Sir lastnail on Jun 27th, 2023 at 11:15am Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 1:37pm:
They all are dangerous more so now than ever and it makes me wonder if any of the retards here who claim they have had i,t actually have had it, and even want more of the junk injected into them knowing that it does nothing ?? |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by issuevoter on Jun 27th, 2023 at 11:30am Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 26th, 2023 at 12:13pm:
It didn't kill me. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Carl D on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:13pm
I had 2 AstraZeneca Covid vaccinations 2 years ago and all I had was a sore arm for a few days after the first one.
This was discussed here in another thread a few months back (might have been one of Sir Nail's) but the AstraZeneca vaccine has not been banned in Australia - the remaining stock of AZ had reached their expiry date and newer more effective vaccines (against the latest Covid variants) have since been developed. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Sir lastnail on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:44pm Carl D wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:13pm:
How come the senate refuses to investigate the excess deaths carl ?? What skeletons are they trying to hide in their closets carl ;) |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:54pm Carl D wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:13pm:
No that’s not true Carl. Back in 2021 (remember we’re in 2023 now) ...many countries had banned the use of AstraZeneca. OUR govt didn’t. It continued until all the doses were used up. (waste not/want not - type of mentality). Have you any idea how angry I am about that? And I’m not at all vaccinated. I just don’t like seeing people’s trust being breached like this. And politicians do that EVERY bloody day! Politicians pretend to be anything but what they REALLY are : professional spruikers who are driven by a nasty Machiavellian mindset. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Sir lastnail on Jun 27th, 2023 at 1:23pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:54pm:
remember where they come from. Most of them are lawyers by trade so they all went to lying school ;) |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 1:41pm Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 1:23pm:
Ha! That’s true! Many politicians are ex lawyers. Which reminds me...my eldest son is finishing his law degree soon. He’s completed his Bachelor of Arts/Bachelor of Education double degree program and he did exceedingly well (he studied economics and politics) so when he said he intended to stay on at Uni to study more I though perhaps he might continue until he himself became a Uni lecturer. Nope! My beautiful little boy is hell bent on becoming a bloody lawyer instead. And there’s nothing I can do or say to make him change his mind either. Any idea how hopeless I feel? I struggle each day trying to figure out where I went wrong with that kid. And yes I pray every night he doesn’t get lured to the dark side ie politics. I wouldn’t be able to cope with the stress. Or shock for that matter 😩 |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 27th, 2023 at 2:26pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 12:54pm:
It wasn't banned. The roll-out of the vaccine was suspended. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Bobby. on Jun 27th, 2023 at 2:31pm
I survived 3 jabs of AstraZeneca - looks like I dodged 3 bullets. :o
|
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Sir lastnail on Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:14pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 1:41pm:
Tell him not to become a wills and estate lawyer because they are all crooks :( |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:44pm Sir lastnail wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 3:14pm:
He is currently working part time for a criminal lawyer....a well known Australian barrister in fact. It’s a network thing that supports graduates of certain private schools and certain more upmarket universities 😩 So I think (he won’t say as he knows how I feel about the matter) he’s going to go into criminal law (by that I mean he will be specialising in defending criminals as there’s a lot of work ie opportunity for experience in that area of criminal law). He most definitely wasn’t going anywhere near the grubby and ethically bankrupt area of Family Law. That much he did make clear. I wish he could go into teaching/lecturing but this is the problem with kids today...they think they know everything about everything BEFORE their frontal lobe (which governs high level logic and reasoning) has fully developed. 😐 Anyway .... let’s get back to politicians - those selfish arseholes supposedly representing the electorate but who really represent their own self interests at all times. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:19pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 2:26pm:
Ok. Let’s take a closer look at these 2 words. Let me illustrate my point by way of example. Remember school? Do you remember those idiots who always sat at the back of the class and mucked up every day and who couldn’t give a toss about abiding by the rules? They faced being suspended or getting expelled/banned. And they sometimes were. Either way ... they were marked and they stood out for all the wrong reasons. Likewise the AstraZeneca vaccine was marked and yes it also stood out (internationally) for all the wrong reasons. If you’re the Prime Minister of Australia you are in a position of authority AND trust. There is an expectation that you will not breach that trust. There is an expectation that you will put the interests/needs of the electorate first and foremost and that you will at all times do that which is right FOR ALL PEOPLE who are under your authority. What I’m asserting is this : Our PM and his colleagues (from both sides of politics mind you) collectively prioritised $$$$ first and in doing so ... they did not prioritise the risk to people’s lives. If they had prioritised people’s lives over money then they would have suspended AstraZeneca back in 2021. Why? Because THAT’S when OTHER countries DID so and THAT’s when OUR doctors here in Australia sent our govt letters requesting Federal govt backed protection against liability for patients under their care who got sick/died because of the AstraZeneca vaccine they were being pushed to continue giving. Interested in knowing what our Federal govt said to our doctors here in Australia who were worried about using AstraZeneca? They were told to keep going and not to worry about liability or indemnity insurance blow outs as the Federal Govt would cover them. Greg ... I know you may not believe me and that’s fine but some doctors were so disgusted that they still refused to give their patients the AstraZeneca vaccine. I guess professional ethics kinda got in the way. And I don’t know if you can recall that it was a difficult and challenging time back then because the Pfizer vaccine was slower to roll out. 😔😩🥺 Ok so now you know why I didn’t vote for the Liberals in the last Federal Election. 😐 |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Carl D on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:35pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:19pm:
Just got back and I'm looking at these 2 words I posted earler: "Sir Nail('s)" And it appears I've now woken him up after we've enjoyed several 'Nail Free' days here. Sorry everyone. :-[ Now I'm trying to find the 2 magic words to make him go away again - I have 2 specific words in mind right now but the forum word censor probably won't let me post them (well, not the first word at least) and if it did I'd probably cop a ban. :) |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by greggerypeccary on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:37pm Lisa Jones wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:19pm:
Well yes, that's capitalism. Or, Neoliberalism. Profit over people. |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:40pm Carl D wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:35pm:
How about : Log off? |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Gordon on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:40pm
Anyone who defends Fizzer must be seriously fffkkkeeeddd in the head
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2009/sep/02/pfizer-drugs-us-criminal-fine |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Sir lastnail on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:50pm Carl D wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:35pm:
no one gives a flying fick whether you come back here or not carl because no one with even a single digit IQ is going to jab themselves now ;) |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:57pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:37pm:
I must admit I was expecting you to rip into my post. Oh never mind... but I do have quite a few links/evidence here. Make no mistake Greg ... we, the people of Australia have most certainly been used. As human lab rats. So now here I am totally disgusted, disappointed and disillusioned by BOTH major parties because BOTH collaborated in this. I do not trust Liberal OR Labor about ANYTHING! ANYMORE! More importantly I cannot and will not trust these 2 major political parties. They stand for themselves. And they SHARE the same networks. That’s something we are often completely unaware of. We’ve been played. And we’re still being played. I think I might have to start a new topic about this. Please do not misconstrue my concerns as being conspiracy theorist centred. I’m concerned about people’s safety more than people’s money. That’s where I’m coming from. Note : I’m not afraid to be challenged though. It keeps me on my toes. And helps me learn more. Ok? |
|
Title: Re: AstraZeneca - dangerous & no longer approved Post by Lisa Jones on Jun 27th, 2023 at 5:01pm Gordon wrote on Jun 27th, 2023 at 4:40pm:
The Pfizer BRAND is mud and has been mud for some time. Time to expose these arseholes I say. https://www.enjuris.com/blog/resources/largest-pharmaceutical-settlements-lawsuits/ Some interesting info in that 👆 Could someone organise the table in the above link to appear as an attachment? |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |