Australian Politics Forum
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> Chat >> Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1680171622

Message started by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 8:20pm

Title: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 8:20pm
Here it is:






Mark Latham’s offensive tweet deleted, Pauline Hanson releases a video statement | 7NEWS


1,452 views  Mar 30, 2023  #MarkLatham #7NEWS

Pauline Hanson has demanded her party's New South Wales leader publicly apologise over an offensive comment about a gay MP made on Twitter. Mark Latham posted the slur in response to comments made in an newspaper article by independent Alex Greenwich. Mr Greenwich had earlier referred to Mr Latham a 'disgusting person'. He replied with a remark too offensive to broadcast. Pauline Hanson says he's gone too far.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwyG7nMlUOc


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 8:22pm

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/one-nation-mp-mark-latham-slammed-over-homophobic-tweet/news-story/a3998315ba0d0c060e12acb99a0e9655


Gay MP responds to NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham’s homophobic tweet

A gay MP who was targeted by NSW One Nation Leader Mark Latham in a homophobic tweet has hit back with a classy response.
Eli Green
2 min read
March 30, 2023 - 8:06PM

A gay MP who was targeted by NSW One Nation Leader Mark Latham in a homophobic tweet has hit back with a classy response.

Mr Latham wrote the tweets on Thursday in response to comments from openly gay MP Alex Greenwich blasting him for his involvement in an event where LGBTQIA+ protesters were targeted.

“Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and people who are considering voting for One Nation need to realise they are voting for an extremely hateful and dangerous individual who risks causing a great deal of damage to our state,” Mr Greenwich said last week.

In response, Latham wrote “Disgusting? How does that compare with -” before making a crude reference to a sexual act.

Mr Greenwich responded to the uproar on Twitter on Thursday evening, posting a picture of him alongside his husband.

He wrote: “For those wondering how I’m doing after Latham’s homophobic attacks today, I’m fine and I’m more motivated than ever to deliver long overdue LGBTIQA+ reforms… and I have the most handsome husband.”





Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 8:26pm
.


Mark_Latham_s_Tweet.jpg (157 KB | 16 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:20pm
It IS true, though.

Drilling for choki IS more disgusting.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm

It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:30pm

Frank wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:20pm:
It IS true, though.

Drilling for choki IS more disgusting.



Vegemite drillers.   ;D

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:34pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.

Says a Vegemite who is also a driller for Vegemite.

Disgusting.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:37pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely told the truth.



Only Big Brother tells us what's true.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇
E39E30F5-6AC0-4364-960A-2E760678B743.jpeg (117 KB | 15 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:43pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you personally find this sex act disgusting?

A question is just a question.

Does Alex engage in the practice?  Chocolate croissant on the outside?



Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 30th, 2023 at 10:10pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.


Former, yes.

And thank goodness for that.

The "man" is a cowardly, worthless POS.

Biggest mistake the Labor Party ever made.

Will he break your pastor's arm when he visits your church?

I'm curious.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 30th, 2023 at 11:28pm
Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇
1EA5052B-A0DC-4624-A333-374F84EE7817.jpeg (117 KB | 11 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 31st, 2023 at 6:05am

Honesty is such a lonely word
Everyone is so untrue
Honesty is hardly ever heard
And mostly what I need from you


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuFScoO4tb0

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am
Mark is an honest man.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Redmond Neck on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!

Or his "Please Explain!"  moron party leader for that matter!

>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:32am

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!

Or his "Please Explain!"  moron party leader for that matter!

>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(



He was the only one who had the guts to say what everyone knows is true.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by greggerypeccary on Mar 31st, 2023 at 1:33pm

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!


Indeed.

Wouldn't piss down his throat if he had heart burn?


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 1:57pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 11:28pm:
Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇


D3702B72-CD2F-448F-A5D1-B564CF5CB828.jpeg (117 KB | 13 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by mothra on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:00pm
Is it possible to go a day without you trashing threads with your relentless spam, Larry?

Title: Why can’t Greggary answer such a simple question?
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:01pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 1:57pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 11:28pm:
Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇


DAE2C6CD-C906-472C-A981-1B4C50706E04.jpeg (117 KB | 11 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:03pm

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:32am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!

Or his "Please Explain!"  moron party leader for that matter!

>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(



He was the only one who had the guts to say what everyone knows is true.


Exactly. Not even Groggy has the guts to say what he thinks of the act! Especially with Mad Methra on stand by ready to whack him one if he dares to voice his honest opinion and it’s not what Methra thinks it ought to be. 😐
50970BA1-8D9D-49C2-ABD7-962DF062527F.jpeg (117 KB | 11 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by mothra on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:07pm
You look ridiculous, Larry.

Just so you know.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Gordon on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:09pm
Alex loves this

https://youtu.be/hn859rykYgE

Title: Groggy is in BIG trouble if he posts his opinion
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:09pm
Poor Groggy 😩😳😔


Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:03pm:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:32am:

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!

Or his "Please Explain!"  moron party leader for that matter!

>:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(



He was the only one who had the guts to say what everyone knows is true.


Exactly. Not even Groggy has the guts to say what he thinks of the act! Especially with Mad Methra on stand by ready to whack him one if he dares to voice his honest opinion and it’s not what Methra thinks it ought to be. 😐


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Baronvonrort on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:17pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇


Little pecca said he loves anal sex in this forum.

Labor don't have a majority in NSW they will rely on this Poofter Alex to govern with minority.

One inner city Poofter will be holding Labor to ransom.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:21pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:17pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇


Little pecca said he loves anal sex in this forum.

Labor don't have a majority in NSW they will rely on this Poofter Alex to govern with minority.

One inner city Poofter will be holding Labor to ransom.


Did he??? I must have missed it.

But last night I realised just by reading his own posts that Groggy thought the act was great. Not disgusting at all.

Hence why I posted my question in an effort to get a little clarification from Groggy about what he personally thought about this act 👇
88E19911-AA47-4FE4-BCEF-CA29F7087024.jpeg (117 KB | 12 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Gordon on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:39pm
NSW policy will be like this pipe.

Will Alex shove something up there to clear it?

https://youtu.be/hn859rykYgE

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Dnarever on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:57pm

Quote:
Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.


I waited a day - I knew that I didn't want to know.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by aquascoot on Mar 31st, 2023 at 3:20pm

mothra wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:00pm:
Is it possible to go a day without you trashing threads with your relentless spam, Larry?



i wonder who has trashed every thread with his fantasies about "child rape"

who might that be ? ::) ::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Mar 31st, 2023 at 3:59pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 3:20pm:
i wonder who has trashed every thread with his fantasies about "child rape"

who might that be ? Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



is that an excuse for LARRY doing it, dumbarse?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Aussie on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:07pm

mothra wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:07pm:
You look ridiculous, Larry.

Just so you know.


And yet you and others keep responding to her posts.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by UnSubRocky on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by UnSubRocky on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:23pm
Of course, the reason for Hanson's nervousness is indicative of her truthfulness. Hanson does not actually disagree with Latham. Hanson is on record as saying that she finds homosexuality unnatural.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

Thd left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 8:00pm

aquascoot wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 3:20pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:00pm:
Is it possible to go a day without you trashing threads with your relentless spam, Larry?



i wonder who has trashed every thread with his fantasies about "child rape"

who might that be ? ::) ::) ::) ::)


Methra in drag. That’s who!

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Mar 31st, 2023 at 8:01pm

Aussie wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:07pm:

mothra wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:07pm:
You look ridiculous, Larry.

Just so you know.


And yet you and others keep responding to her posts.


Actually only Methra kept responding to my posts and said posts were specifically aimed at Groggy. Weird troll isn’t he/she/it?


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Mattyfisk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 1:14am

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you PERSONALLY find this sex act disgusting? Yes or No?

I’m merely asking for YOUR PERSONAL OPINION on the sex ACT 👇


How divine. Can there be a nicer way to express one's love for another than inserting one's digits into their bottom and imbibing their stool?

I think not. There is absolutely nothing disgusting about it at all, dear. We've all been there.

You?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Mattyfisk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 1:15am

Frank wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:43pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:40pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.



1. Latham is your former Labor leader.

2. Latham merely responded by telling the truth AFTER being baited and abused by a gay politician.


Greggary do you personally find this sex act disgusting?

A question is just a question.

Does Alex engage in the practice?  Chocolate croissant on the outside?


You.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Mattyfisk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 1:21am

mothra wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 2:00pm:
Is it possible to go a day without you trashing threads with your relentless spam, Larry?


I do feel Lisa is a victim of love, Mother. She endures so much, with so much pain.

She does enjoy her stool, and why not? She's a true connoisseur.

We'll introduce her to Frank, shall we?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 1:58pm
Labor needs the vote of the homo Independent MP Alex Greenwich
who Mark Latham insulted with his tweet as Labor is a minority Government.



Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:27pm
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mark-latham-refuses-to-apologise-for-homophobic-tweet/ar-AA19jIyU?ocid=BingHPCNews

Mark Latham refuses to apologise for homophobic tweet


Story by Phoebe Loomes • 3h ago





Mark Latham is thumbing his nose at calls to apologise for a homophobic comment
he posted and later deleted about openly gay Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.



"Disgusting?" Mr Latham wrote before making a graphic and homophobic description of sex acts.

"Sometimes in public life when you throw out insults they come back at you harder and truer … So boo-hoo Alex Greenwich," Mr Latham said in a statement to The Saturday Telegraph.

It comes after Mr Greenwich said Mr Latham's comments briefly brought him to tears.

Mr Latham said he deleted his tweet because he felt it was not acceptable for children to read.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:




parsing_checkbox.jpg (161 KB | 9 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:20pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:


I didn't ask where it is, I asked WHAT it is

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:23pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:


I didn't ask where it is, I asked WHAT it is



It's the text that surrounds what we write which tells the server how to present your post.
Without it you wouldn't see quote boxes.   ::)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:26pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:


I didn't ask where it is, I asked WHAT it is



It's the text that surrounds what we write which tells the server how to present your post.
Without it you wouldn't see quote boxes.   ::)


Thanks.  I was wondering why my quotes weren't coming up right

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by The Grappler on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:36pm
What's offensive about that tweet?

Stuff the gays......  oh ... wait a minute......

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by The Grappler on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:38pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


Just runs parsing in the night...

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:39pm

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:36pm:
What's offensive about that tweet?

Stuff the gays......  oh ... wait a minute......


Dumbarse

And don't pretend you didn't play hide the sausage with your mates when you were in the army :D

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:40pm
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mark-latham-refuses-to-apologise-for-homophobic-tweet/ar-AA19jIyU?ocid=BingHPCNews

Mark Latham refuses to apologise for homophobic tweet


Story by Phoebe Loomes • 3h ago





Mark Latham is thumbing his nose at calls to apologise for a homophobic comment
he posted and later deleted about openly gay Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.



"Disgusting?" Mr Latham wrote before making a graphic and homophobic description of sex acts.

"Sometimes in public life when you throw out insults they come back at you harder and truer … So boo-hoo Alex Greenwich," Mr Latham said in a statement to The Saturday Telegraph.

It comes after Mr Greenwich said Mr Latham's comments briefly brought him to tears.

Mr Latham said he deleted his tweet because he felt it was not acceptable for children to read.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by aquascoot on Apr 1st, 2023 at 4:01pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:40pm:
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mark-latham-refuses-to-apologise-for-homophobic-tweet/ar-AA19jIyU?ocid=BingHPCNews

Mark Latham refuses to apologise for homophobic tweet


Story by Phoebe Loomes • 3h ago





Mark Latham is thumbing his nose at calls to apologise for a homophobic comment
he posted and later deleted about openly gay Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.



"Disgusting?" Mr Latham wrote before making a graphic and homophobic description of sex acts.

"Sometimes in public life when you throw out insults they come back at you harder and truer … So boo-hoo Alex Greenwich," Mr Latham said in a statement to The Saturday Telegraph.

It comes after Mr Greenwich said Mr Latham's comments briefly brought him to tears.

Mr Latham said he deleted his tweet because he felt it was not acceptable for children to read.



is he a 2 yo ?   :'( :'( :'(

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 4:11pm

aquascoot wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 4:01pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:40pm:
https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/mark-latham-refuses-to-apologise-for-homophobic-tweet/ar-AA19jIyU?ocid=BingHPCNews

Mark Latham refuses to apologise for homophobic tweet


Story by Phoebe Loomes • 3h ago





Mark Latham is thumbing his nose at calls to apologise for a homophobic comment
he posted and later deleted about openly gay Sydney MP Alex Greenwich.



"Disgusting?" Mr Latham wrote before making a graphic and homophobic description of sex acts.

"Sometimes in public life when you throw out insults they come back at you harder and truer … So boo-hoo Alex Greenwich," Mr Latham said in a statement to The Saturday Telegraph.

It comes after Mr Greenwich said Mr Latham's comments briefly brought him to tears.

Mr Latham said he deleted his tweet because he felt it was not acceptable for children to read.



is he a 2 yo ?   :'( :'( :'(



fags cry easily.




Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 4:18pm
Yes, you do, Booby. Anything you want to tell us?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:04pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 4:18pm:
Yes, you do, Bobby. Anything you want to tell us?



I want to know why you support homosexuality?


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:07pm
Homosexuality doesn’t need supporting.

It is still here despite thousands of years of persecution of gays, gays like you.

God makes some people gay. Being gay therefore cannot be bad, can it?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:19pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:07pm:
Homosexuality doesn’t need supporting.

It is still here despite thousands of years of persecution of gays, gays like you.

God makes some people gay. Being gay therefore cannot be bad, can it?



Don't use God to defend them -

you're defending the actions of Lucifer.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Jovial Monk on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:29pm
Nope, according to the bible god created people. Some people, like you, are gay. God made the world and Adam and Eve, not Lucifer.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Black Orchid on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Apr 1st, 2023 at 6:05pm

Jovial Monk wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:07pm:
Homosexuality doesn’t need supporting.

It is still here despite thousands of years of persecution of gays, gays like you.

God makes some people gay. Being gay therefore cannot be bad, can it?

Ih, so you are now a devotee of an interventionist God?



Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:17pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 10:10pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:35pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
It's not often that Pauline is right, but she's right this time.

Kudos to her for exposing this grub.

Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.


1. Latham is your former Labor leader.


Former, yes.

And thank goodness for that.

The "man" is a cowardly, worthless POS.

Biggest mistake the Labor Party ever made.

Will he break your pastor's arm when he visits your church?

I'm curious.


Spoken by the Forum's biggest COWARD and POS.
There you have it members.
;)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:22pm

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.


So true.
I believe she has a sincere unselfish ambition in Politics.
But politically speaking, she's abhorrent.
Her Ranga sister Julia Gillard was politically slick, but she only had her own selfish ambition for herself and not Australia.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:23pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 1:33pm:

Redmond Neck wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:24am:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 11:15am:
Mark is an honest man.



I wouldnt piss on him if he was on fire!


Indeed.

Wouldn't piss down his throat if he had heart burn?

True.
But you would cum down his throat if he wore lipstick and a wig.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:26pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )

5-Dogs Smith is a moron who can't spell most of the time.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:27pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:


I didn't ask where it is, I asked WHAT it is



It's the text that surrounds what we write which tells the server how to present your post.
Without it you wouldn't see quote boxes.   ::)


Thanks.  I was wondering why my quotes weren't coming up right

You're a Moron.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by philperth2010 on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:30pm

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.


If I was in Latham's position I wouldn't apologise via 'Media' pressure.
Best to be sacked for being right, than give in to 'bending over' with an apology and taking it up the arse - which is what they want him to do.
Let's see what will happen, eh?
;)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:31pm

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)

Yes - the thought of 'poo-jabbing' is disgusting, isn't it Philperth? ;)

Worked a Private Hospital where the male Villawood detainees were brought in on tax-payer's money to have their 'rectums' repaired from all the buggery in the Detention Centre. Yuk!!

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?

C8FB4328-51DB-4BA8-9FCC-DEADB9BB2648.jpeg (117 KB | 11 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:37pm
You know a Corrupt people - when they find the Truth itself disgusting.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:38pm

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.


That’s right! Greenwich actually baited Latham in the first place.

No one here except for you has mentioned that.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:41pm
Will Latham 'bend over and take it up the arse' by apologising?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:49pm

Jasin wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:27pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:26pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:23pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:20pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:18pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:06pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 3:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:44pm:

Frank wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 2:37pm:

Frank wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:56pm:

UnSubRocky wrote on Mar 31st, 2023 at 5:19pm:
27 years in the public spotlight, and Pauline Hanson has not learned how to speak publicly without stuttering.

With Biden it is excused by the proggy hypochrite, with Hanson it isnt.

The left lives on two faced hypocrisy.


Pauline only shutters when she's lying



Smith turn parsing off -    ::)      ( disable parsing checkbox )



Wtf is parsing?


here:


I didn't ask where it is, I asked WHAT it is



It's the text that surrounds what we write which tells the server how to present your post.
Without it you wouldn't see quote boxes.   ::)


Thanks.  I was wondering why my quotes weren't coming up right

You're a Moron.


You can only dream of aspiring to my levels.  You might as well dream of flying to the moon by flapping your arms

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:51pm
Whatever you say 5-DOGS  ;D ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 8:15pm

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



But the fag cried.     :'(

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Sir lastnail on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:28pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?


Latham was just stating the obvious :D LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PfDro1UGUo

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Baronvonrort on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:42pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?


Latham was right.

Poofters get Urinary Tract Infections from doing that.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=gays+and+uti&source=hp&ei=khcoZIyVMN2j2roP2NmS8A0&iflsig=AOEireoAAAAAZCglopqk-uHE5UkMFSsTk71S2EgihHGc&ved=0ahUKEwiMps6NzIj-AhXdkVYBHdisBN4Q4dUDCAs&uact=5&oq=gays+and+uti&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICAAQgAQQsQM6BQgAEIAEOgsIABCKBRCxAxCDAToLCC4QigUQsQMQgwE6CwguEK8BEMcBEIAEOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToNCC4QgAQQxwEQ0QMQCjoICC4QgAQQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6BwguEIAEEAo6CAgAEIAEEMcDOgYIABAWEB5QAFikV2CgdWgCcAB4AoAB3yiIAZx4kgEPMy0xLjIuNC4wLjQuMS4xmAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?


Latham was right.

Poofters get Urinary Tract Infections from doing that.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=gays+and+uti&source=hp&ei=khcoZIyVMN2j2roP2NmS8A0&iflsig=AOEireoAAAAAZCglopqk-uHE5UkMFSsTk71S2EgihHGc&ved=0ahUKEwiMps6NzIj-AhXdkVYBHdisBN4Q4dUDCAs&uact=5&oq=gays+and+uti&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICAAQgAQQsQM6BQgAEIAEOgsIABCKBRCxAxCDAToLCC4QigUQsQMQgwE6CwguEK8BEMcBEIAEOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToNCC4QgAQQxwEQ0QMQCjoICC4QgAQQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6BwguEIAEEAo6CAgAEIAEEMcDOgYIABAWEB5QAFikV2CgdWgCcAB4AoAB3yiIAZx4kgEPMy0xLjIuNC4wLjQuMS4xmAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz


You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:02pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:
You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D



Hi John,
are you supporting filthy sexual practices and a homosexual lifestyle?
You're not a homo are you?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:04pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:
You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D



Hi John,
are you supporting filthy sexual practices and a homosexual lifestyle?
You're not a homo are you?



You should be watching  'hang em high', it's on 82 now.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Baronvonrort on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:12pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?


Latham was right.

Poofters get Urinary Tract Infections from doing that.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=gays+and+uti&source=hp&ei=khcoZIyVMN2j2roP2NmS8A0&iflsig=AOEireoAAAAAZCglopqk-uHE5UkMFSsTk71S2EgihHGc&ved=0ahUKEwiMps6NzIj-AhXdkVYBHdisBN4Q4dUDCAs&uact=5&oq=gays+and+uti&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICAAQgAQQsQM6BQgAEIAEOgsIABCKBRCxAxCDAToLCC4QigUQsQMQgwE6CwguEK8BEMcBEIAEOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToNCC4QgAQQxwEQ0QMQCjoICC4QgAQQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6BwguEIAEEAo6CAgAEIAEEMcDOgYIABAWEB5QAFikV2CgdWgCcAB4AoAB3yiIAZx4kgEPMy0xLjIuNC4wLjQuMS4xmAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz


You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D


FACT CHECK
The rate of UTI in poofters is far higher than UTI in straight men.



Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:16pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:
You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D



Hi John,
are you supporting filthy sexual practices and a homosexual lifestyle?
You're not a homo are you?



You should be watching  'hang em high', it's on 82 now.



82?  -not in Melbourne -

you are still not unchecking parsing.   ::)

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:19pm

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:12pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:42pm:

Lisa Jones wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:35pm:

philperth2010 wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 7:28pm:

Black Orchid wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 5:54pm:
Greenwich started the attack by calling Latham "extremely hateful and dangerous and a disgusting human being."

Latham returned fire.   If you can't take the heat stay out of the kitchen.



Greenwich was proven correct....Mark Latham is a disgusting human being and proved it with his disgusting tweet!!!

::) ::) ::)


What was particularly disgusting to you about this tweet? Was it the sex act itself ?


Latham was right.

Poofters get Urinary Tract Infections from doing that.

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=gays+and+uti&source=hp&ei=khcoZIyVMN2j2roP2NmS8A0&iflsig=AOEireoAAAAAZCglopqk-uHE5UkMFSsTk71S2EgihHGc&ved=0ahUKEwiMps6NzIj-AhXdkVYBHdisBN4Q4dUDCAs&uact=5&oq=gays+and+uti&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAM6CwgAEIAEELEDEIMBOhEILhCABBCxAxCDARDHARDRAzoICAAQgAQQsQM6BQgAEIAEOgsIABCKBRCxAxCDAToLCC4QigUQsQMQgwE6CwguEK8BEMcBEIAEOgsILhCABBDHARCvAToNCC4QgAQQxwEQ0QMQCjoICC4QgAQQ1AI6BwgAEIAEEAo6BwguEIAEEAo6CAgAEIAEEMcDOgYIABAWEB5QAFikV2CgdWgCcAB4AoAB3yiIAZx4kgEPMy0xLjIuNC4wLjQuMS4xmAEAoAEB&sclient=gws-wiz


You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D


FACT CHECK
The rate of UTI in poofters is far higher than UTI in straight men.


This was from your link dumbarse


Quote:
The prevalence of urinary tract infection among homosexuals was therefore similar to that in the heterosexual population.


You'd do well to read any links you put up rather than pretend you know what they say

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:21pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:
You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D



Hi John,
are you supporting filthy sexual practices and a homosexual lifestyle?
You're not a homo are you?



You should be watching  'hang em high', it's on 82 now.



82?  -not in Melbourne -

you are still not unchecking parsing.   ::)


It's one of the Chanel 9 stations, whatever the number is in Melbourne

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by John Smith on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:24pm
.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:25pm

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:21pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:16pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:04pm:

Bobby. wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 10:02pm:

John Smith wrote on Apr 1st, 2023 at 9:56pm:
You should read your own links you idiot.  Your link found the rates of uti in homosexuals is the same as that with hetro males.

:D :D



Hi John,
are you supporting filthy sexual practices and a homosexual lifestyle?
You're not a homo are you?



You should be watching  'hang em high', it's on 82 now.



82?  -not in Melbourne -

you are still not unchecking parsing.   ::)


It's one of the Chanel 9 stations, whatever the number is in Melbourne



parsing?


so it is Channel 95   GEM.


Hang 'Em High

9:45PM - 12:05AM

CC

REPEAT

When an innocent man barely survives a lynching, he returns as a lawman determined to bring the vigilantes to justice.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 2nd, 2023 at 7:38pm
5-Dogs Smith the Moron supports men who get faeces UTI's and need repairs on their rectums.
Is 5-Dogs Smith the Moron also an anal pumping butt-monkey?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 2nd, 2023 at 7:42pm

Jasin wrote on Apr 2nd, 2023 at 7:38pm:
5-Dogs Smith the Moron supports men who get faeces UTI's and need repairs on their rectums.
Is 5-Dogs Smith the Moron also an anal pumping butt-monkey?



It's disgusting:


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by buzzanddidj on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 12:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.



It's hard to fathom how so many of us could have been so "politically seduced" by him as ALP parliamentary leader in 2003.
His mentor and close friend was Gough Whitlam, for Christ's sake !
Defeating him at the Federal Election was one of the very few decent things Howard ever did for Australia (the other one being the gun buy-back, paid for by a new tax, though I believe Tim Fisher was the REAL architect)




.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 1:11pm

Bobby. wrote on Apr 2nd, 2023 at 7:42pm:

Jasin wrote on Apr 2nd, 2023 at 7:38pm:
5-Dogs Smith the Moron supports men who get faeces UTI's and need repairs on their rectums.
Is 5-Dogs Smith the Moron also an anal pumping butt-monkey?



It's disgusting:


You’re both correct.

Frodo has indeed been rooting for homosexuals in this topic.

And the sex act Frodo has been rooting for IS disgusting.


803068DA-0A19-4FEE-A2DD-B4035B2218F6.jpeg (117 KB | 14 )

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 1:30pm

buzzanddidj wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 12:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.



It's hard to fathom how so many of us could have been so "politically seduced" by him as ALP parliamentary leader in 2003.
His mentor and close friend was Gough Whitlam, for Christ's sake !
Defeating him at the Federal Election was one of the very few decent things Howard ever did for Australia (the other one being the gun buy-back, paid for by a new tax, though I believe Tim Fisher was the REAL architect)


.



Mark only said what everyone thinks including queers - including you.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by UnSubRocky on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 6:42pm
.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 7:14pm

buzzanddidj wrote on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 12:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 9:21pm:
Latham is the scum that lives on the scum stuck to scum.



It's hard to fathom how so many of us could have been so "politically seduced" by him as ALP parliamentary leader in 2003.
His mentor and close friend was Gough Whitlam, for Christ's sake !
Defeating him at the Federal Election was one of the very few decent things Howard ever did for Australia (the other one being the gun buy-back, paid for by a new tax, though I believe Tim Fisher was the REAL architect)




.

You're right in that sense Buzz. Latham was nothing more than a Political 'Whip' - a stand over guy and that's what lost it for him against Howard the Environmental Terrorist.
I've never really thought much of him.
But I think he at least had the balls to defend himself with the truth when attacked for being 'disgusting'.
Case of Two Wrongs not making a right here Buzz? :-?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Xavier on Apr 3rd, 2023 at 8:42pm
So have the Gay Lords made Latham bend over with an apology to save his job and take it up the arse by them, yet?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 9:39pm
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/greenwich-to-sue-latham-over-homophobic-tweet-c-10508134



Greenwich demands Latham apologise or face legal action


Phoebe Loomes and Maureen DettreAAP
May 1, 2023 8:11AM






Sydney MP Alex Greenwich has launched a series of legal salvos at Mark Latham after the NSW One Nation leader targeted him in a graphic homophobic tweet.

Mr Greenwich has flagged potentially "significant" defamation proceedings, sparked an investigation by NSW Police and lodged a complaint of homosexual vilification and sexual harassment with the Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW.

Despite widespread condemnation, the controversial One Nation MP has refused to apologise for the tweet he posted on March 30 which Mr Greenwich described as "defamatory and homophobic".

The comments were in response to Mr Greenwich calling Mr Latham a "disgusting human being" after LGBTQIA+ protesters were attacked outside a forum where Mr Latham was speaking.

When pressed for an apology, Mr Latham tweeted "never apologise, never explain".

Mr Latham doubled down on the comments during an appearance on TNT Radio last week.

Mr Greenwich said he did not take the action lightly but it was time someone stood up to Mr Latham, saying "enough is enough".

"He made a very sexualised, targeted attack at me on Twitter, seeking to impugn my reputation amongst colleagues, and he has since said that he believes that that's a view that all straight men believe," Mr Greenwich told reporters on Monday.

"He has continued to make comments around whether it is appropriate for me to talk about my sexuality, whether I am in any way possibly considered to be a threat to children.

"Rather than retracting or apologising, Mr Latham continues to reinforce what I consider to be extremely defamatory, vilifying language, directed at me."

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Dnarever on May 1st, 2023 at 9:55pm
Poor old Mark was once a credible candidate for PM. He went one term too early and paid the price.

He lost the plot somewhere not long after.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 9:59pm

Dnarever wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 9:55pm:
Poor old Mark was once a credible candidate for PM. He went one term too early and paid the price.

He lost the plot somewhere not long after.



Latham was only telling the truth.      :-[

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Jovial Monk on May 1st, 2023 at 10:31pm
What truth?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by philperth2010 on May 1st, 2023 at 10:51pm
Even Pauline Hanson finds Latham disgusting....Is this the kind of debate people want from there elected officials....I am not surprised the usual right wing arseholes applaud disgusting hate speech they support....Why not slag off at single mothers as lazy women who are raising “lazy and ugly children”???

::) ::) ::)

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/kids/one-nation-candidate-sparks-outrage-after-describing-single-mothers-as-too-lazy-to-attract-and-hold-a-mate/news-story/b04bf9207686410eeba5cf0c3732cae2

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by philperth2010 on May 1st, 2023 at 10:56pm

Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 9:59pm:
[quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1680171622/98#98 date=1682942114]Poor old Mark was once a credible candidate for PM. He went one term too early and paid the price.

He lost the plot somewhere not long after.



Latham was only telling the truth.      :-[/quote]

It was a disgusting comment appealing to the lowest and most pathetic individuals it was aimed at....Any decent person (not you Bobby) would accept the comment was out of order and disgusting....Letting public debate sink into the gutter is where you belong....Latham will be sued and he deserves it!!!

[smiley=thumbdown.gif] [smiley=thumbdown.gif] [smiley=thumbdown.gif]

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on May 1st, 2023 at 11:04pm

philperth2010 wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 10:56pm:

Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 9:59pm:
[quote author=Jim_Puddle-Duck link=1680171622/98#98 date=1682942114]Poor old Mark was once a credible candidate for PM. He went one term too early and paid the price.

He lost the plot somewhere not long after.



Latham was only telling the truth.      :-[/quote]

It was a disgusting comment appealing to the lowest and most pathetic individuals it was aimed at....Any decent person (not you Bobby) would accept the comment was out of order and disgusting....Letting public debate sink into the gutter is where you belong....Latham will be sued and he deserves it!!!

[smiley=thumbdown.gif] [smiley=thumbdown.gif] [smiley=thumbdown.gif]




Look mate - that's what they do - it's disgusting.    :-[

They even do a lot more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On3etueeGIg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euXQbZDwV0w

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bias_2012 on May 1st, 2023 at 11:42pm
He won't have to apologize, he wasn't talking to the poof, or talking about him

It was just a general statement of what poofs do




Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on May 2nd, 2023 at 3:34pm

Bias_2012 wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 11:42pm:
He won't have to apologize, he wasn't talking to the poof, or talking about him

It was just a general statement of what poofs do



And he was telling the truth.
Can any court convict him for that?




Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Baronvonrort on May 2nd, 2023 at 3:45pm

Bobby. wrote on May 1st, 2023 at 9:39pm:
https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/crime/greenwich-to-sue-latham-over-homophobic-tweet-c-10508134



Greenwich demands Latham apologise or face legal action


Phoebe Loomes and Maureen DettreAAP
May 1, 2023 8:11AM






Sydney MP Alex Greenwich has launched a series of legal salvos at Mark Latham after the NSW One Nation leader targeted him in a graphic homophobic tweet.

Mr Greenwich has flagged potentially "significant" defamation proceedings, sparked an investigation by NSW Police and lodged a complaint of homosexual vilification and sexual harassment with the Anti-Discrimination Board of NSW.

Despite widespread condemnation, the controversial One Nation MP has refused to apologise for the tweet he posted on March 30 which Mr Greenwich described as "defamatory and homophobic".

The comments were in response to Mr Greenwich calling Mr Latham a "disgusting human being" after LGBTQIA+ protesters were attacked outside a forum where Mr Latham was speaking.

When pressed for an apology, Mr Latham tweeted "never apologise, never explain".

Mr Latham doubled down on the comments during an appearance on TNT Radio last week.

Mr Greenwich said he did not take the action lightly but it was time someone stood up to Mr Latham, saying "enough is enough".

"He made a very sexualised, targeted attack at me on Twitter, seeking to impugn my reputation amongst colleagues, and he has since said that he believes that that's a view that all straight men believe," Mr Greenwich told reporters on Monday.

"He has continued to make comments around whether it is appropriate for me to talk about my sexuality, whether I am in any way possibly considered to be a threat to children.

"Rather than retracting or apologising, Mr Latham continues to reinforce what I consider to be extremely defamatory, vilifying language, directed at me."


One Nation have 3 elected members in NSW.

Alex is Independent elected in gay part of Sydney he is irrelevant.



Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Gordon on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:00am
Listen

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8wxTDDK/

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 14th, 2023 at 3:37pm
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/14/mark-latham-dumped-one-nation-nsw-leader-pauline-hanson

Mon 14 Aug 2023 14.47 AEST

Mark Latham dumped as One Nation’s NSW leader
after intervention from Pauline Hanson


Hanson cites party’s electoral performance in letter to members disbanding the party state’s executive.



Earlier this year, Hanson called on Latham to apologise following a tweet
about his parliamentary college, Alex Greenwich.
Greenwich is now suing Latham for defamation.

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/08/mark-latham-defamation-court-case-trial-homophobia-alex-greenwich

Latham has faced sustained criticism for the comment about Greenwich and subsequent remarks on the topic.

Last week Latham lodged a defence briefing with the court outlining how he planned to defend the defamation action.

He will argue he was offering an “honest opinion” when he posted the graphic and homophobic tweet.


It came after Greenwich filed a statement of claim in June, in which the Sydney MP argued he had been subjected to “threats, repeated jibes, hatred, homophobic comments and contempt and ridicule” as a result of Latham’s comments.

Latham’s team will argue the initial comment posted on Twitter – the platform now known as X – was an “honest opinion” and related to “a matter of public interest”, being comments Greenwich had previously made about Latham.


Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 14th, 2023 at 3:42pm
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/aug/08/mark-latham-defamation-court-case-trial-homophobia-alex-greenwich

Tue 8 Aug 2023 13.03 AEST

Mark Latham to argue homophobic tweet about Alex Greenwich
was ‘honest opinion’ in defamation defence


NSW One Nation leader will defend himself against action brought by Greenwich, who says he has been subjected to ‘threats’ since Latham’s comments


In the now-deleted tweet, Latham said “disgusting?”, and made gratuitous comments about a sexual act. Guardian Australia has chosen not to publish the comments in full.

Greenwich’s lawyers have alleged the tweet was defamatory because it implied the politician was “not a fit and proper person to be a member of the NSW parliament” because he “engages in disgusting sexual activities”.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:00pm
Slow News Week. Obviously 🙄

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Frank on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:02pm

Gordon wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:00am:
Listen

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8wxTDDK/


Greenwich started it by lying and vilifying Latham.  Greenwich's Green Left devotees continued it.

Latham said what he thought disgusting. So now he's the "thought criminal".




Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:06pm

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:02pm:

Gordon wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:00am:
Listen

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8wxTDDK/


Greenwich started it by lying and vilifying Latham.  Greenwich's Green Left devotees continued it.

Latham said what he thought disgusting. So now he's the "thought criminal".



The Tweet was honest opinion.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Lisa Jones on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:14pm

Bobby. wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:06pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:02pm:

Gordon wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:00am:
Listen

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8wxTDDK/


Greenwich started it by lying and vilifying Latham.  Greenwich's Green Left devotees continued it.

Latham said what he thought disgusting. So now he's the "thought criminal".



The Tweet was honest opinion.


It also reflected the honest thoughts/opinions of many Australians.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:48pm

Lisa Jones wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:14pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:06pm:

Frank wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 4:02pm:

Gordon wrote on May 3rd, 2023 at 11:00am:
Listen

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8wxTDDK/


Greenwich started it by lying and vilifying Latham.  Greenwich's Green Left devotees continued it.

Latham said what he thought disgusting. So now he's the "thought criminal".



The Tweet was honest opinion.


It also reflected the honest thoughts/opinions of many Australians.



Mark is crucified for revealing the truth.

Remind you of anyone?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Postmodern Trendoid III on Aug 14th, 2023 at 5:34pm
.

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Postmodern Trendoid III on Aug 14th, 2023 at 5:35pm

Bobby. wrote on Mar 30th, 2023 at 8:20pm:
Here it is:






Mark Latham’s offensive tweet deleted, Pauline Hanson releases a video statement | 7NEWS


1,452 views  Mar 30, 2023  #MarkLatham #7NEWS

Pauline Hanson has demanded her party's New South Wales leader publicly apologise over an offensive comment about a gay MP made on Twitter. Mark Latham posted the slur in response to comments made in an newspaper article by independent Alex Greenwich. Mr Greenwich had earlier referred to Mr Latham a 'disgusting person'. He replied with a remark too offensive to broadcast. Pauline Hanson says he's gone too far.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwyG7nMlUOc


that's effing hilarious

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 14th, 2023 at 7:57pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 5:35pm:
that's effing hilarious



To what are you referring to that is so funny?

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Postmodern Trendoid III on Aug 15th, 2023 at 10:07am

Bobby. wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 7:57pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 5:35pm:
that's effing hilarious



To what are you referring to that is so funny?


latham's tweet

Title: Re: Mark Latham in trouble for Tweet.
Post by Bobby. on Aug 15th, 2023 at 1:13pm

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 15th, 2023 at 10:07am:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 7:57pm:

Postmodern Trendoid III wrote on Aug 14th, 2023 at 5:35pm:
that's effing hilarious



To what are you referring to that is so funny?


latham's tweet



He said what 99% of people think but dare not say.

Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.