Quote:

Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination Published: 27 November 2022 Abstract Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is lacking. We describe the autopsy findings and common characteristics of myocarditis in untreated persons who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Standardized autopsies were performed on 25 persons who had died unexpectedly and within 20 days after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis. Results Among the 35 cases of the University of Heidelberg, autopsies revealed other causes of death (due to pre-existing illnesses) in 10 patients (Supplementary Table 1). Hence, these were excluded from further analysis.Cardiac autopsy findings consistent with (epi-)myocarditis were found in five cases of the remaining 25 bodies found unexpectedly dead at home within 20 days following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Clinical findings, blood tests, ECGs or imaging data were not available as deceased persons did not seek medical attention prior to death. Person 1 was found dead 12 h after the vaccination. A witness described a rattling breath shortly before discovering circulatory failure. Person 2 complained about nausea and was found dead soon thereafter. Resuscitation was started immediately but without success, respectively. The other persons were found dead at home without available information about terminal symptoms. According to the available information provided at the time of autopsies, none of the deceased persons had SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination and nasopharyngeal swabs were negative in all cases. All cases lacked significant coronary heart disease, acute or chronic manifestations of ischaemic heart disease, manifestations of cardiomyopathy or other signs of a pre-existing, clinically relevant heart disease. Through our autopsy-based approach, we identified five cases of lymphocytic (epi-)myocarditis in persons, who were unexpectedly found dead at home within the first week following mRNA-mediated anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunization In general, a causal link between myocarditis and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is supported by several considerations: (A) a close temporal relation to vaccination; all cases were found dead within one week after vaccination, (B) absence of any other significant pre-existing heart disease, especially ischaemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy, (C) negative testing for potential myocarditis-causing infectious agents, (D) presence of a peculiar CD4 predominant T-cell infiltrate, suggesting an immune mediated mechanism. Based on the autopsy findings and all available data, no other cause of death except (epi-)myocarditis was identified in any of the cases presented here. More here-https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

results like this should not be suppressed.

and governments should never mandate medical treatments, its a personal and private decision between a doctor and a patient.

it would still be the case that most people may still be wanting to get vaccinated

thats perfectly fine.

but the whole thing should have been left in the hands of the doctors.

when did dan andrews or gladys or anastasia become qualified to give authoritarian health advice.

when did google and youtube get to decide which people with a science degree can speak and which ones cant?

i'm sure gallilleo would have been shadow banned


all the data should have been given to the chief health officer who should have passed that on to the GP's and then people should have gone and talked to their GP.

just like every single other disaese ever known (or manufactured)

aquascoot wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:18pm:

results like this should not be suppressed. and governments should never mandate medical treatments, its a personal and private decision between a doctor and a patient. it would still be the case that most people may still be wanting to get vaccinated thats perfectly fine. but the whole thing should have been left in the hands of the doctors. when did dan andrews or gladys or anastasia become qualified to give authoritarian health advice. when did google and youtube get to decide which people with a science degree can speak and which ones cant? i'm sure gallilleo would have been shadow banned all the data should have been given to the chief health officer who should have passed that on to the GP's and then people should have gone and talked to their GP. just like every single other disaese ever known (or manufactured)

Dirty Dan had no right to do that except that he enacted
emergency legislation so he could legally get away with it.
As far as I know - whenever it was challenged in court - Dan won.

Smart people knew something wasn't right from the get go.

aquascoot wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:18pm:

results like this should not be suppressed. and governments should never mandate medical treatments, its a personal and private decision between a doctor and a patient. it would still be the case that most people may still be wanting to get vaccinated thats perfectly fine. but the whole thing should have been left in the hands of the doctors. when did dan andrews or gladys or anastasia become qualified to give authoritarian health advice. when did google and youtube get to decide which people with a science degree can speak and which ones cant? i'm sure gallilleo would have been shadow banned all the data should have been given to the chief health officer who should have passed that on to the GP's and then people should have gone and talked to their GP. just like every single other disaese ever known (or manufactured)

One of the worst decisions was giving Big Pharma indemnity for adverse effects.

That gave them a green light to print money without consequences.


Quote:

Pfizer’s CEO rapped by regulator for making ‘misleading’ statements about children’s vaccines Pfizer’s CEO has been rapped by the UK’s pharmaceutical watchdog for making “misleading” statements about children’s vaccines, The Telegraph can disclose.  Dr Albert Bourla used an interview with the BBC last December to claim that “there is no doubt in my mind that the benefits, completely, are in favour of” vaccinating youngsters aged five to 11 against Covid-19.  He argued that “Covid in schools is thriving” adding: “This is disturbing, significantly, the educational system, and there are kids that will have severe symptoms.” The interview was published on Dec 2 - before the vaccine had been approved by Britain’s medical regulator for this age group. ‘Extremely promotional in nature’ The complaint alleged that Dr Bourla’s remarks about the children’s vaccine were “disgracefully misleading” and “extremely promotional in nature”, arguing that it breached several clauses of the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry’s (ABPI) code of practice.  “There is simply no evidence that healthy schoolchildren in the UK are at significant risk from the SARS COV-2 virus and to imply that they are is disgracefully misleading,” they said.  https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/music/pfizer-e2-80-99s-ceo-rapped-by-regulator-for-making-e2-80-98misleading-e2-80-99-statements-about-children-e2-80-99s-vaccines/ar-AA14AulX

The censorship with scientists who were right is alarming there should be consequences for that.

This is why the MSM has gone all quiet because they know this now.  ;)

Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 5:48pm:

Quote: Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination Published: 27 November 2022 Abstract Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is lacking. We describe the autopsy findings and common characteristics of myocarditis in untreated persons who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Standardized autopsies were performed on 25 persons who had died unexpectedly and within 20 days after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Here, we describe the cardiac autopsy findings in five persons who have died unexpectedly within seven days following anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination, with vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation representing the likely or possible cause of death. Our findings establish the histological phenotype of lethal vaccination-associated myocarditis. Results Among the 35 cases of the University of Heidelberg, autopsies revealed other causes of death (due to pre-existing illnesses) in 10 patients (Supplementary Table 1). Hence, these were excluded from further analysis.Cardiac autopsy findings consistent with (epi-)myocarditis were found in five cases of the remaining 25 bodies found unexpectedly dead at home within 20 days following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Clinical findings, blood tests, ECGs or imaging data were not available as deceased persons did not seek medical attention prior to death. Person 1 was found dead 12 h after the vaccination. A witness described a rattling breath shortly before discovering circulatory failure. Person 2 complained about nausea and was found dead soon thereafter. Resuscitation was started immediately but without success, respectively. The other persons were found dead at home without available information about terminal symptoms. According to the available information provided at the time of autopsies, none of the deceased persons had SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination and nasopharyngeal swabs were negative in all cases. All cases lacked significant coronary heart disease, acute or chronic manifestations of ischaemic heart disease, manifestations of cardiomyopathy or other signs of a pre-existing, clinically relevant heart disease. Through our autopsy-based approach, we identified five cases of lymphocytic (epi-)myocarditis in persons, who were unexpectedly found dead at home within the first week following mRNA-mediated anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunization In general, a causal link between myocarditis and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is supported by several considerations: (A) a close temporal relation to vaccination; all cases were found dead within one week after vaccination, (B) absence of any other significant pre-existing heart disease, especially ischaemic heart disease or cardiomyopathy, (C) negative testing for potential myocarditis-causing infectious agents, (D) presence of a peculiar CD4 predominant T-cell infiltrate, suggesting an immune mediated mechanism. Based on the autopsy findings and all available data, no other cause of death except (epi-)myocarditis was identified in any of the cases presented here. More here-https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00392-022-02129-5

Hey Freediver .... have you read this yet? I wouldn't mind hearing YOUR opinion regarding the above article.

Does anyone remember this?


Quote:

Jeannette Young defends AstraZeneca comments used in anti-vax campaign Queensland Chief Health Officer Jeannette Young has defended comments she made about the AstraZeneca vaccine, after they were used in an anti-vax campaign. Posters put up around Melbourne feature an image of Dr Young and a quote from one of her press conferences earlier this year, when she said: “I don’t want an 18-year-old in Queensland dying from a clotting illness who, if they got COVID, probably wouldn’t die.” Asked on Wednesday about the comments being used for an anti-vax campaign, she said she was speaking about choosing the right vaccine, not avoiding vaccines. “I firmly believe that younger people - and I said 18-year-olds in that comment - should be getting Pfizer,” she said. “I do not think they should be getting AstraZeneca. And we have plenty of Pfizer and they can come out and get Pfizer, or Moderna.” Dr Young maintained people under 60 in Queensland should wait for the Pfizer vaccine, which did not have that side-effect, especially as the risk of encountering it went up in younger people. https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/national/queensland/nonsense-anti-vax-campaign-featuring-jeannette-young-slammed-20210929-p58vn9.html

I wonder how many of our excess deaths were strokes caused by AZ.

ABS data showed a 99.9% survival rate for those under 60 when we had the more deadly Delta variant before this mass vaccination.

aquascoot wrote on Dec 7^th, 2022 at 6:18pm:

but the whole thing should have been left in the hands of the doctors. when did dan andrews or gladys or anastasia become qualified to give authoritarian health advice.

Indeed.

Politicians (and business CEO's) should not be allowed to dictate public health advice, especially during an ongoing global pandemic that's already killed millions and continues to kill and disable people.

They've removed every single Covid protection we had just for the sake of the economy which is why we're in the Covid mess we find ourselves in now.

Cases skyrocketing, 100 Australians on average a week dying and many more hospitalised.

Been saying that for a long time now.

It's great that you've finally seen it... "one small step" and all that, isn't it?

Carl D wrote on Dec 8^th, 2022 at 6:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Dec 7th, 2022 at 6:18pm: but the whole thing should have been left in the hands of the doctors. when did dan andrews or gladys or anastasia become qualified to give authoritarian health advice. Indeed. Politicians (and business CEO's) should not be allowed to dictate public health advice, especially during an ongoing global pandemic that's already killed millions and continues to kill and disable people. They've removed every single Covid protection we had just for the sake of the economy which is why we're in the Covid mess we find ourselves in now. Cases skyrocketing, 100 Australians on average a week dying and many more hospitalised. Been saying that for a long time now. It's great that you've finally seen it... "one small step" and all that, isn't it?

The main point missed again on you as usual :(

---

Is there a point to any of this?

Here's an interesting (and very tragic) point.

‘Sickest person in Adelaide’: Young woman in a coma after contracting Covid

Paywalled but the story is attached.

This wasn't caused by the Covid vaccines.

---

Carl D wrote on Dec 8^th, 2022 at 6:09pm:

Here's an interesting (and very tragic) point. ‘Sickest person in Adelaide’: Young woman in a coma after contracting Covid Paywalled but the story is attached. This wasn't caused by the Covid vaccines.

They're not sure the vax didn't cause it.


Quote:

He said while other explanations could not be ruled out, including that a vaccine had caused the heart inflammation https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-12-08/adelaide-couple-face-covid-heart-and-amputation-ordeal/101751510

Did your WA Government say myocarditis is associated with all Covid vaccines?

Did your WA government say most cases of vaccine induced myocardtits have required hospitalisation and patients with confirmed myocarditis should go to hospital?

Linky- https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1668373929/17#17