Belgium - ISLAM-O-PHOBES get six months in prison

....for peacefully expressing their concerns and their own opinions.


People like brain just 'can't wait' until courts in Australia start issuing similar verdicts against ISLAM-O-PHOBES.

This is called social 'progress'.    ....by the WOKE brigade.




The banner which those protesters publicly displayed said, “Stop Islamization”.

....it is a simple message.


n.b. !!!!
These kind of [court] decisions, ARE a 'wedge' for the 'normalisation' of the acceptance of ISLAMIC law, in Europe.

We [anyone who believes pluralism, is better than a MONO-O-CULTURAL political state] should all be concerned about what is happening here, ....in Belgium.


.




Quote:

Belgium: Protesters get six months in prison for ‘Stop Islamization’ banner Jun 5, 2021 By Robert Spencer                        28 Comments Sharia states are the same all over the world: they discriminate fiercely against women, they deny non-Muslims numerous rights, they’re human rights basket cases with draconian punishments for homosexuality, adultery, theft, and more, and they’re vociferously anti-Semitic. But if you oppose all that in the West, you’re the problem. ...... According to the criminal court in Mechelen, that banner went too far. “By having such signs and banners, the accused have the aim of instilling fear and creating hate in society by convincing onlookers of the idea that possibly in the future, Islam will dominate Flanders, ” the verdict reads. ......

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/06/belgium-protesters-get-six-months-in-prison-for-stop-islamization-banner


ISLAMISTS and the WOKE LEFTISTS tell us, such change is nothing to worry about.

.......and, the presence of the followers of ISLAM, living among us,  is nothing to worry about.




Because those ISLAMISTS and the WOKE LEFTISTS tell us,
that they know more about the nature and character of ISLAM,
than you do....






Quote:

“Peace and love are at the center of our religion, as evidenced by scripture and history,...”

- Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah
CITED... https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/02/uae-forum-promotes-dubious-islamic-peace



.



"ISLAM ES PAZ"


IMAGE.....
http://www.infranken.de/storage/image/5/6/5/3/2673565_cms2image-fixedwidth-900x0_1pCjLB_n1lRiw.jpg

Yadda wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 8:44pm:

Belgium - ISLAM-O-PHOBES get six months in prison ....for peacefully        expressing their concerns....

IN COMMENTS, same article.....


Quote:

Ade Fegan says       Jun 5, 2021 at 4:09 pm If we are not allowed to express our concerns .. how will anyone ever know we have any ?

https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/06/belgium-protesters-get-six-months-in-prison-for-stop-islamization-banner#comment-2350263


EXACTLY SO.



.



Within a politically pluralist based society, the 'virtue' of the right [in law] to publicly express opinions and views [even contentious opinions and views!],
enables citizens to raise issues and topics 'of concern', which may not have been widely known of, or considered, within the wider community.

THAT IS NOT A BAD THING, imo.

The free exchange of ideas and opinions [being protected in law] within a society of men will make any such society,
much more healthy and vibrant a society,
than any society of men
where views and opinions can only expressed, which align with those who express the views and opinions of a currently accepted 'Politically Correct' orthodoxy..

Political correctness.

e.g.
We witness today, how in our society, viewing every issue through the lens of 'Identity Politics',
is always viewed [by the WOKE 'hive mind'] as a socially virtuous way for an individual to 'think'.



One system tends towards reasoned thought, individual vibrancy, and [actually promotes] individual competency.

While the other, imo, tends towards a stiffing, authoritarian [fascist] 'group-think',
where 'questioning' of an accepted orthodoxy is suppressed, if not being actually outright prohibited.

ISLAM.

Stalinism.

Six months in prison? That's a bad idea. It will have repercussions.

issuevoter wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 9:48pm:

Six months in prison? That's a bad idea. It will have repercussions.

How so ?

Do you care to elaborate ?




I disagree.    [about, 'it will have repercussions']

Most 'caring' [politically savvy] people in our modern, technological society today [all Western societies],
will choose to 'go along, to get along'.

They will choose to 'look the other way'.



There are no     Tienanmen Square 'tank man'     types, in our Western societies today.

Do you, personally, know any one, an Australian, who would put his career or livelihood at risk, by choosing to publicly speak out at any Politically Correct wrongdoing ?
....making his own action, as being widely viewed as politically incorrect ?

e.g.
re Followers of ISLAM, in Australia.

Is there even one politician in any of our parliaments, who would dare to publicly berate the nature and character of ISLAM, and the veiled intents of its followers ?

Or is there not even one politician in any of our parliaments, who has any idea of what ISLAM is ?

Yadda wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 10:07pm:

....... I disagree.    [about, 'it will have repercussions'] Most 'caring' [politically savvy] people in our modern, technological society today [all Western societies], will choose to 'go along, to get along'. They will choose to 'look the other way'.

“We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise.
We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.”
- The Abolition of Man, by C.S. Lewis

Yadda wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 8:44pm:

the accused have the aim of instilling fear and creating hate in society by convincing onlookers of the idea that possibly in the future, Islam will dominate Flanders, ” the verdict reads.

According to that verdict, Belgium must have a democracy that would disallow Islam from dominating Flanders, and that would be an insult to Islamists

Even Democracy and Islam specialist Brian Ross agrees that in a democracy, any group can win government and become the dominate group (He said in a post from the past)

Expressing the view of "Stopping Islamization" is no worse than saying "Stop Communism", and in my opinion, is quite legitimate under the right of free speech

To say it creates "hate", is subjective and speculative conjecture and rejects the idea that a democratic society can make up it's own mind.

Crying "hate" is populist among leftwing globalist progressives, but I'm surprised that a judge would use the term, not very judicial of him/her

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 10:36pm:

Even Democracy and Islam specialist Brian Ross agrees that in a democracy, any group can win government and become the dominate group (He said in a post from the past)

brian said....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1603357057/39#39

Quote:

.....Muslims, if Australian citizens have as much right as you have, to work to change Australia and it's society to better reflect what they desire it to be. Not all Muslims are Islamists, despite what you might believe. Most Muslims are peaceful, moderate and law-abiding individuals.

[how does he do that!!!          ;D    ]

https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/google/223/yawning-face_1f971.png

Oh, dearie, dearie, me.  Islamophobic tantrums.  Stamping your feet, shouting at the top of your lungs, won't hide that this is a childish tantrum.  Tsk, tsk.   ::) ::)

Yadda wrote on Jun 6^th, 2021 at 11:02pm:

Bias_2012 wrote on Jun 6th, 2021 at 10:36pm: Even Democracy and Islam specialist Brian Ross agrees that in a democracy, any group can win government and become the dominate group (He said in a post from the past) brian said.... http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1603357057/39#39 Quote: .....Muslims, if Australian citizens have as much right as you have, to work to change Australia and it's society to better reflect what they desire it to be. Not all Muslims are Islamists, despite what you might believe. Most Muslims are peaceful, moderate and law-abiding individuals. [how does he do that!!!          ;D    ]

Yes that might be the one, it looks like it, if my memory serves me correctly

The logic of his post reads, that if Western culture and values declined in Australia due to the growing influence of Eastern Islamic culture, to such an extent where muslims and Islam became the dominate force in Parliament, then the Monarch would have to accept that Sharia Law will gain a foothold in Australia - in the fullness of time, God willing, the muslims would say

The key words in his post are: "to work to change Australia and it's society to better reflect what they desire it to be"
So how would muslims like Australia's society to be? - that is the question

Using Brian's logic again (he's left the logic wide open), muslims in Parliament can bring in legislation, but only if it procured the support of the voters, otherwise they'd be voted out. Brian believes strongly in the democratic vote, and therefore he must also believe that the voters should have the last say, not the muslims

Now given that there's lots of different religions and political viewpoints in Australia, muslim MPs really would have a very difficult time bringing in Sharia Law, which is what they abide by in their homes, mosques and out doors when they're in groups

What muslim MPs would be able to do in a multicultural society and democracy would be extremely limited. Ed Husic would know by now what's possible and what's not possible for muslim MPs in a Constitutional Monarchy type parliament. For a start, no religion can be brought into the legislating procedure, nor can religion be allowed to interfere with the State. So that just leaves Sharia Law, and that's what muslim MPs would work on - If we let them. Who would vote for Sharia Law?, lots of muslims I should imagine, but probably very few other voters. However, as muslim numbers grow, the more the support for Sharia Law grows