I want my 'Ivermectin triple therapy' blister packs !!

Where are they ?



You can give my 'ration', of the mRNA vaccination for COVID, to Scott Morrison and his executive cabinet !

Suck it up Scott !

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1613424390/39#39



.



THE ALTERNATIVE TO THE mRNA vaccination for COVID

Why aren't we being offered a choice ?

------- >


Doctor claims Ivermectin triple therapy is 'amazingly effective' in treating COVID-19
08 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93jI7Gl3yic


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=93jI7Gl3yic



.



Ivermectin treatment is a ‘real killer of coronavirus’: Professor
08 min
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6A6RFDprIs


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6A6RFDprIs

Seriously dude, what is wrong with you. THis is the same poo you've posted at least 15 other times n other threads.

Its therapy.

My therapy.

Whats wrong with you !          :P



You don't want me to 'bottle it all up' do you ?

Yadda wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:22am:

Its therapy. My therapy. Whats wrong with you !          :P You don't want me to 'bottle it all up' do you ?

No, but sticking to one thread on this unproven drivel will do.  BTW whats mRNA?

Quote:

Sheba researcher: Antiparasitic drug reduces length of COVID-19 infection According to his yet to be published data, Schwartz said that the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, last week completed a clinical trial of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug ivermectin, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent that has also been shown to fight viruses. The double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 100 people with mild to moderate cases of the disease who were not hospitalized for the virus. It tested whether ivermectin could shorten the viral shedding period, allowing them to test negative for coronavirus and leave isolation in only a few days. According to his still unpublished data, Schwartz said the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Moreover, the chances of testing negative for coronavirus were three times higher for the group who received ivermectin than the placebo, he told The Jerusalem Post. Because ivermectin is FDA-approved, its safety does not have to be proven, Schwartz said. Rather, approval just needs to be received for its use in this new indication, he said. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/antiparasitic-drug-reduces-covid-19-infection-exclusive-658949

I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Ivermectin there is a lot of info out there showing promising results.

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:38am:

Quote: Sheba researcher: Antiparasitic drug reduces length of COVID-19 infection According to his yet to be published data, Schwartz said that the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, last week completed a clinical trial of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug ivermectin, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent that has also been shown to fight viruses. The double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 100 people with mild to moderate cases of the disease who were not hospitalized for the virus. It tested whether ivermectin could shorten the viral shedding period, allowing them to test negative for coronavirus and leave isolation in only a few days. According to his still unpublished data, Schwartz said the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Moreover, the chances of testing negative for coronavirus were three times higher for the group who received ivermectin than the placebo, he told The Jerusalem Post. Because ivermectin is FDA-approved, its safety does not have to be proven, Schwartz said. Rather, approval just needs to be received for its use in this new indication, he said. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/antiparasitic-drug-reduces-covid-19-infection-exclusive-658949 I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Ivermectin there is a lot of info out there showing promising results.

About as much as HCQ, so not much at all.

https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/study-finds-use-of-ivermectin-to-treat-coronavirus-could-be-detrimental-to-patients/

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:40am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17th, 2021 at 9:38am: Quote: Sheba researcher: Antiparasitic drug reduces length of COVID-19 infection According to his yet to be published data, Schwartz said that the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, last week completed a clinical trial of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug ivermectin, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent that has also been shown to fight viruses. The double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 100 people with mild to moderate cases of the disease who were not hospitalized for the virus. It tested whether ivermectin could shorten the viral shedding period, allowing them to test negative for coronavirus and leave isolation in only a few days. According to his still unpublished data, Schwartz said the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Moreover, the chances of testing negative for coronavirus were three times higher for the group who received ivermectin than the placebo, he told The Jerusalem Post. Because ivermectin is FDA-approved, its safety does not have to be proven, Schwartz said. Rather, approval just needs to be received for its use in this new indication, he said. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/antiparasitic-drug-reduces-covid-19-infection-exclusive-658949 I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Ivermectin there is a lot of info out there showing promising results. About as much as HCQ, so not much at all. https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/study-finds-use-of-ivermectin-to-treat-coronavirus-could-be-detrimental-to-patients/

Like this one on HCQ?


Quote:

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33042552/

I wonder how long it will take for the idiots to catch up with the latest news.

The lancet published a paper which resulted in WHO stopping all HCQ trials, turns out the lancet paper failed peer review so it was retracted

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:46am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 17th, 2021 at 9:40am: Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17th, 2021 at 9:38am: Quote: Sheba researcher: Antiparasitic drug reduces length of COVID-19 infection According to his yet to be published data, Schwartz said that the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Prof. Eli Schwartz, founder of the Center for Travel Medicine and Tropical Disease at Sheba Medical Center in Tel Hashomer, last week completed a clinical trial of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved drug ivermectin, a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent that has also been shown to fight viruses. The double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 100 people with mild to moderate cases of the disease who were not hospitalized for the virus. It tested whether ivermectin could shorten the viral shedding period, allowing them to test negative for coronavirus and leave isolation in only a few days. According to his still unpublished data, Schwartz said the drug was shown to help “cure” people of the virus within just six days. Moreover, the chances of testing negative for coronavirus were three times higher for the group who received ivermectin than the placebo, he told The Jerusalem Post. Because ivermectin is FDA-approved, its safety does not have to be proven, Schwartz said. Rather, approval just needs to be received for its use in this new indication, he said. https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/antiparasitic-drug-reduces-covid-19-infection-exclusive-658949 I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Ivermectin there is a lot of info out there showing promising results. About as much as HCQ, so not much at all. https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/study-finds-use-of-ivermectin-to-treat-coronavirus-could-be-detrimental-to-patients/ Like this one on HCQ? [quote] Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review HCQ was found to be consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting. It was also found to be overall effective in inpatient studies. No unbiased study found worse outcomes with HCQ use. No mortality or serious safety adverse events were found. HCQ is consistently effective against COVID-19 when provided early in the outpatient setting, it is overall effective against COVID-19, it has not produced worsening of disease and it is safe. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33042552/

I wonder how long it will take for the idiots to catch up with the latest news.

The lancet published a paper which resulted in WHO stopping all HCQ trials, turns out the lancet paper failed peer review so it was retracted
[/quote]



Or this one

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77748-x#Sec47


I wonder how long it will take the idiots like you baron to realise that the evidence is so weak, especially when shown in these metaanalyses that you pull your Trump blinkers off and see it was a waste of time

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:46am:

I wonder how long it will take for the idiots to catch up with the latest news. The lancet published a paper which resulted in WHO stopping all HCQ trials, turns out the lancet paper failed peer review so it was retracted

Additionally, do you know why it was retracted? And what retraction means? It doesn't mean that because a paper shows X, that if its retracted, X is false, it just means the paper is not evidence for X being true.


Big difference

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 17^th, 2021 at 9:55am:

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 17th, 2021 at 9:46am: I wonder how long it will take for the idiots to catch up with the latest news. The lancet published a paper which resulted in WHO stopping all HCQ trials, turns out the lancet paper failed peer review so it was retracted Additionally, do you know why it was retracted? And what retraction means? It doesn't mean that because a paper shows X, that if its retracted, X is false, it just means the paper is not evidence for X being true. Big difference

The Lancet retracted it because it didn't pass a real peer review nothing to do with your bullshit.

That bogus bullshit they published resulted in WHO stopping all trials of HCQ which resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths which all those who opposed HCQ have the blood of those deaths on their hands.

The lancet published a study that used unverified data which means it was a bullshit study


Quote:

How did The Lancet's now-retracted study on hydroxychloroquine make it through peer review? Scientists around the world are resuming trials of the controversial drug hydroxychloroquine for possible use against COVID-19 after the retraction of a heavily criticised study into its effects and side-effects. When the study was first published in the highly influential medical journal The Lancet, it prompted the World Health Organisation (WHO) to pause trials on the drug, which has long been used for preventing or treating malaria, as well as lupus. Now the paper has been retracted, and the WHO trials are back on,after several of the paper's authors said they were not able to verify the contents of a database at the heart of the study. So how did a paper of this size, with such apparent flaws, make it through peer review to publication in The Lancet? And how badly did it stall progress on assessing the drug's worth in the fight against coronavirus? But many scientists voiced concern about the study following its publication. Nearly 150 doctors signed an open letter to The Lancet questioning the article's conclusions, and calling for the peer review comments that preceded publication to be released. Why is hydroxychloroquine getting so much attention? You can thank the President of the United States for the drug's notoriety.Donald Trump has repeatedly promoted hydroxychloroquine's use, calling it a "game changer" in the fight against coronavirus. Criticism over the quality of its data led to the Lancet study's withdrawal. The Lancet's study caused ripple effects The WHO's decision to halt its trials on hydroxychloroquine as a result of the study had knock-on effects across the medical profession. The United Kingdom's COPCOV trial, which was investigating whether hydroxychloroquine could prevent healthcare workers contracting COVID-19, was put on hold just a week after launch. French company Sanofi also temporarily stopped recruiting for its study into the drug. Both the UK and French studies have yet to resume. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-05/hydroxychloroquine-study-the-lancet-peer-review-coronavirus/12324118

The 150 doctors who questioned the lancet study resulting in it being retracted understand science far better than the idiots like bumcrack noseman who fritters away his life on this forum pretending to be an expert on everything.

Not sure you understand what poeer review is, want it explained?

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 18^th, 2021 at 8:28pm:

Not sure you understand what poeer review is, want it explained?

I understand what peer review is i did study science at Sydney Uni.

The HCQ study published in the lancet halted all trials on HCQ, the lancet retracted it when it failed a proper  peer review.

Did the TGA ban the use of these drugs for the Kung Flu based  on a flawed study published in the lancet that was proven to be bogus bullshit?

---

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 18^th, 2021 at 8:43pm:

Did the TGA ban the use of these drugs for the Kung Flu based on a flawed study published in the lancet that was proven to be bogus bullshit?

Of course they did.

But all academics in Australia, fear being publicly 'Cancelled' by the nazi-leftist-cutlural-commissars who are entrenched in the academia hierarchy,
so no   'scientist'   will tell the truth.

scientist = = a 'book learned', career scum bag academic, who is a politically correct academia 'qualified'    a rse    licker.    [with my apologies to those few AUTHENTIC scientists who still respect truth, AND 'THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD'.]

Australian study on Ivermectin.


Quote:

The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Highlights • Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro. • A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture. • Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections, and therefore has a potential for repurposing. • Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines. Abstract Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011

The big pharma who push the expensive vaccines might not like cheaper alternatives.

Quote:

Medicine professor slams SA Ivermectin sceptics; many experts aren’t looking at the right data Professor Colleen Aldous on Ivermectin: Ivermectin came onto my radar [when] a friend of mine who was a farmer send me a WhatsApp that had the details about the experiment that they did in Monash University last year – where they showed that ivermectin, in a petri dish, was able to kill off the virus. This was around October. I did a quick literature search and found the first paper that came up, that said that ivermectin was not effective. So I just sent that back to him. There was a lot of clutching at straws in the beginning of the pandemic. In December, another friend of mine actually got sick with Covid. He phoned me up and told me that his doctor wanted to put him in hospital – he was so ill. A friend had given him to ivermectin tablets and he’d taken the one. Within 24 hours, he felt completely different. He was well. With my scientist thinking I thought, ‘that’s wonderful for you – great coincidence. You were probably going to get better anyway. I left it at that. Then I saw this presentation that Pierre Kory had given, and at that point I realised that there’s enough evidence that ivermectin makes an impact [and] that scientists cannot ignore it and we cannot be dismissive of it. more here- https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2021/02/19/ivermectin-sceptics

Facebook banned an Australian politician for mentioning this.

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 28^th, 2021 at 9:54pm:

Australian study on Ivermectin. Quote: The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Highlights • Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro. • A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture. • Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections, and therefore has a potential for repurposing. • Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines. Abstract Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011 The big pharma who push the expensive vaccines might not like cheaper alternatives.

An OBVIOUS motive, for the suppression of all information about Ivermectin triple therapy, which hardly anyone in the medical academic mainstream is willing to acknowledge/confront.

And this circumstance, is precisely why so many people are so cynical today.

Because the citizenry [the people], are continually being deceived and lied to,
by supposed 'experts' and by     wholly CORRUPT      persons who are present in our parliaments.


How else, could you describe persons who lie, and cheat and steal, to further their own interests ?

What an absolute human sewer Canberra must be.

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 28^th, 2021 at 10:01pm:

Quote: Medicine professor slams SA Ivermectin sceptics; many experts aren’t looking at the right data Professor Colleen Aldous on Ivermectin: Ivermectin came onto my radar [when] a friend of mine who was a farmer send me a WhatsApp that had the details about the experiment that they did in Monash University last year – where they showed that ivermectin, in a petri dish, was able to kill off the virus. This was around October. I did a quick literature search and found the first paper that came up, that said that ivermectin was not effective. So I just sent that back to him. There was a lot of clutching at straws in the beginning of the pandemic. In December, another friend of mine actually got sick with Covid. He phoned me up and told me that his doctor wanted to put him in hospital – he was so ill. A friend had given him to ivermectin tablets and he’d taken the one. Within 24 hours, he felt completely different. He was well. With my scientist thinking I thought, ‘that’s wonderful for you – great coincidence. You were probably going to get better anyway. I left it at that. Then I saw this presentation that Pierre Kory had given, and at that point I realised that there’s enough evidence that ivermectin makes an impact [and] that scientists cannot ignore it and we cannot be dismissive of it. more here- https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2021/02/19/ivermectin-sceptics Facebook banned an Australian politician for mentioning this.

With good reason.

Yadda wrote on Feb 28^th, 2021 at 10:09pm:

Baronvonrort wrote on Feb 28th, 2021 at 9:54pm: Australian study on Ivermectin. Quote: The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro Highlights • Ivermectin is an inhibitor of the COVID-19 causative virus (SARS-CoV-2) in vitro. • A single treatment able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in virus at 48 h in cell culture. • Ivermectin is FDA-approved for parasitic infections, and therefore has a potential for repurposing. • Ivermectin is widely available, due to its inclusion on the WHO model list of essential medicines. Abstract Although several clinical trials are now underway to test possible therapies, the worldwide response to the COVID-19 outbreak has been largely limited to monitoring/containment. We report here that Ivermectin, an FDA-approved anti-parasitic previously shown to have broad-spectrum anti-viral activity in vitro, is an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Ivermectin therefore warrants further investigation for possible benefits in humans. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220302011 The big pharma who push the expensive vaccines might not like cheaper alternatives. An OBVIOUS motive, for the suppression of all information about Ivermectin triple therapy, which hardly anyone in the medical academic mainstream is willing to acknowledge/confront. And this circumstance, is precisely why so many people are so cynical today. Because the citizenry [the people], are continually being deceived and lied to, by supposed 'experts' and by     wholly CORRUPT      persons who are present in our parliaments. How else, could you describe persons who lie, and cheat and steal, to further their own interests ? What an absolute human sewer Canberra must be.

Frankly so what if it kills COVID in vitro. Doesn't mean it works as a therapy.


Perhaps Baron and Yadda can research the difference between the terms in vitro and in vivo.

Re Yadda.

When the COVID 19 first started in early 2020, the first scientists to test the efficacy of multiple drugs including HCQ and Ivermectin were the Chinese.  And they published that initially.  Then, the other countries / labs around the world did the same. 

The problem is that what works in vitro does not usually translate to real life efficacy.  In fact, what does work in vitro, would be different to work in vivo for different creatures.   So perhaps, say HCQ is a wonder drug in vitro, and in vivo in Monkeys, but may be totally ineffective in Human.  Why? Because, body systems of different creatures are different.   And then of course, there are adverse effects.  Current treatment protocol for parasitic infections does not automatically translates to doses for a virus. 

Even with the article you have quoted, it mentioned that Ivermectin could be an useful treatment adjuvant, but by no means the only available treatment, and certainly more study is required for a wide spread population usage of the drug. 

IN MY OPINION, it is completely IRRESPONSIBLE for any medical authority, anywhere, to be promoting the mass vaccination of people all around the world, with these completely new messengerRNA Covid vaccines.

The widespread use of these messengerRNA Covid vaccines, is in 'GUINEA PIG' territory, imo.



THIS IS HOW THE cdc.gov SITE DESCRIBES messengerRNA Covid vaccines.

------- >


Quote:

Understanding mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Updated Dec. 18, 2020 Messenger RNA vaccines—also called mRNA vaccines—are some of the first COVID-19 vaccines authorized for use in the United States. New Approach to Vaccines mRNA vaccines are a new type of vaccine to protect against infectious diseases. To trigger an immune response, many vaccines put a weakened or inactivated germ into our bodies. Not mRNA vaccines. Instead, they teach our cells how to make a protein—or even just a piece of a protein— that triggers an immune response inside our bodies. That immune response, which produces antibodies, is what protects us from getting infected if the real virus enters our bodies.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html


.


AND.....


Quote:

10 Things You Need to Know about the Experimental COVID Vaccines DEBATING COVID-19, 25 Jan 2021 ..... Experimental COVID Vaccines: Never-Before-Used Tools to Modify and Program Your Genetics The COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna are called mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines – a completely new type of vaccine that has never been licensed or used on humans before. We have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine, nor no way to know if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a weakened virus to stimulate an immune response. mRNA vaccines inject molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into your cells, thus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID (although, as regular readers of The Freedom Articles know, the virus has never been isolated, purified or proven 100% to exist). These newly created proteins are not regulated by your DNA and are thus completely foreign to your body.

https://www.transcend.org/tms/2021/01/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-experimental-covid-vaccines/

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

CORRECTION - THE LINK I PLACED WITH THAT QUOTE BOX WAS A MISTAKE
the same link to the cdc.gov site refered to the QUOTE BOX higher in my post



.



Yadda said.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1613424390/39#39

Quote:

This Dr SHERRI TENPENNY knows what this 'new' mRNA vaccine is, and she explains how the mRNA vaccine is so different, to the traditional RNA vaccine types. It is scary stuff. [quote] 5.00 m            a vaccine is a molecule which is injected into your body which generates an antibody, that is what by definition, a vaccine is....and this [messengerRNA vaccine] does that.....the problem is that the antibodies which it generates are going to be deadly, and its going to take somewhere between 4 to 14 months before we see the full ravage of what is going to happen to people who are vaccinated with this vaccine. 11.43 m            the main thing in these vaccines.....3 things which we have never, ever, seen in any other vaccine....we have never, ever, seen messengerRNA in any vaccine.....messengerRNA creates [A TOTALLY NEW DELIVERY SYSTEM] in the body, 'antibody dependent enhancement' [LISTEN TO THE NEXT 5-10 MINUTES FROM THIS POINT, DESCRIBING HOW THE MISALLOCATION OF THIS mRNA FUNCTION, WILL OCCUR IN OUR BODY!!] 21.30 m            we're going to see a lot of people get horribly sick [as a consequence of this mRNA code being in their body, which will cause autoimmune system chaos and disorder, and kill many individuals]

The YT LINK was posted by bobby, here.....
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1612783506/14#14

[/quote]


ARGUMENT;
Many of those [even among the academic medical fraternity] who are supporting the use of these completely new types, of messengerRNA Covid vaccines, seem to have abandoned all natural curiosity, and commonsense, IN THINKING, about what could go wrong, in the adoption of these completely new types, of messengerRNA Covid vaccines.

Among those who have developed this messengerRNA Covid vaccine therapy,
there seems to be a total lack of curiosity, about what could go wrong, in the widespread use of these EXPERIMENTAL, and completely new types, of messengerRNA Covid vaccines.
!!!!


AND WHY THIS LACK OF NATURAL CURIOSITY ?

BECAUSE THESE ATTITUDES COULD BE ALL ABOUT FOCUSING UPON MONEY AND PROFITS FOR THE DEVELOPERS OF THESE NEW VACCINE TYPES,
INSTEAD OF ABOUT THE SAFETY OF THIS NEW MEDICINE TYPE, AND THE POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES IF THEY ARE MISTAKEN!!!

tickleandrose wrote on Mar 1^st, 2021 at 12:54pm:

Re Yadda. When the COVID 19 first started in early 2020, the first scientists to test the efficacy of multiple drugs including HCQ and Ivermectin were the Chinese.  And they published that initially.  Then, the other countries / labs around the world did the same.

tickleandrose,

These reports out of China are OLD.


A 'Ivermectin triple therapy' developed by Prof Thomas Borody, has already been trailed in India and other nations, and found to be substantially effective, in killing the Covid virus, in the body.

Ivermectin is a well known [since the 1980's] and safe anti-parasitic drug, which has been authorised for widespread use in 3rd world nations by the WHO.

And the 'Ivermectin triple therapy' has already been manufactured, in blister packs, in India,
and is available for public use from many pharmacies.



The 'Ivermectin triple therapy' is apparently safe for use [against the Covid virus], AND, this safe therapy is effective in destroying the Covid virus, in the human body.

WATCH THE TWO YT'S in the OP.

xperimental COVID Vaccines: Never-Before-Used Tools to Modify and Program Your Genetics

The COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna are called mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines –
a completely new type of vaccine that has never been licensed or used on humans before.

We have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine, nor no way to know if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a weakened virus to stimulate an immune response.

mRNA vaccines inject molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into your cells,
thus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID (although, as regular readers of The Freedom Articles know, the virus has never been isolated, purified or proven 100% to exist). These newly created proteins are not regulated by your DNA and are thus completely foreign to your body.



This quote is not from the rfeference you posted it for (the giveaway being alleged)


And its not true. All of this is copmplete rubbish.


If you were a student, this level of academic misconduct would be a fail.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Mar 2^nd, 2021 at 8:23am:

xperimental COVID Vaccines: Never-Before-Used Tools to Modify and Program Your Genetics The COVID vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna are called mRNA (messenger RNA) vaccines – a completely new type of vaccine that has never been licensed or used on humans before. We have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine, nor no way to know if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccines introduce pieces of a weakened virus to stimulate an immune response. mRNA vaccines inject molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into your cells, thus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID (although, as regular readers of The Freedom Articles know, the virus has never been isolated, purified or proven 100% to exist). These newly created proteins are not regulated by your DNA and are thus completely foreign to your body. This quote is not from the rfeference you posted it for (the giveaway being alleged) And its not true. All of this is copmplete rubbish. If you were a student, this level of academic misconduct would be a fail.

bojack,

You are correct.

And it was my mistake, in my post.

I posted an incorrect LINK to the 2nd QUOTE BOX, which was NOT from the cdc.gov site



CORRECT LINK FOR 2ND QUOTE BOX IS...
https://www.transcend.org/tms/2021/01/10-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-experimental-covid-vaccines/

THE ERROR LINK WHICH I POSTED....
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html

there is link to the cdc.gov site.
but that link, referred to a QUOTE BOX higher in my post

So once again we come back to your lack of understanding about what a mRNA vaccine will do. It will not alter your genes

hus hijacking your genes and permanently reprogramming them to produce antibodies to kill the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus causing COVID


And this is literally what happens in every immune reponse. You reprogram some antibodies for each antigen you come across

Quote:

The Binding mechanism of Ivermectin and levosalbutamol with spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 4. Conclusion Three different computer modeling techniques confirm that ivermectin is more stable than levosalbutamol in the active site of spike protein where hACE2 binds.Therefore, ivermectin can be a suitable inhibitor for SARS-CoV-2 to enter into the human cell through hACE2. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-160254/v1