| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
General Discussion >> America >> biden - less than a week in http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1611552147 Message started by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:22pm |
|
|
Title: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:22pm
jobs gone, energy projects gone, overseas abortions paid for, more riots, china given control over US power, money given to useless overseas organisations.
What did I miss? Quote:
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2021/01/24/expert-biden-actions-against-american-oil-gas-energy-production-could-kill-many-1-million-jobs/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:33pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:22pm:
Well, you forgot to mention that it's all the last President's fault. I'm sure it was an innocent mistake though ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:44pm
100,000 AMERICAN WORKERS FIRED BY JOE BIDEN ON DAY ONE
10,500 working on the border wall... fired . 20,000 Keystone Pipeline Support workers for these projects 25,000 31,200 more pipe-fitter jobs were due to start on the Keystone Pipeline. Looks like the honeymoon is already over. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:51pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:44pm:
Did you cry for the unemployed workers when construction stopped on concentration camps in WWII Poland, Bobby? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:54pm
Wonderfully unbiased source Sprinty used.
What is the cost of the oil to be sent through the XL pipeline? Dearer than normal oil? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:03pm Jovial Monk wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:54pm:
Wouldn't that make it uneconomic? What is the cost sending it via Warren Buffets railroad? Shouldn't the market rather than politics decide? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:04pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:51pm:
Pecca, This forum could do without your smart arse comments. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:06pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:04pm:
It was a question, not a comment. So, did you cry for the unemployed workers when construction stopped on concentration camps in Poland during WWII? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:06pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:22pm:
Ah - made the US less safe. Opened the borders to illegals, ordered ICE to release all those being held. I have not seen more damage in such a short time. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:08pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:06pm:
According to his age profile ---No. He wasn't born yet. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:12pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:08pm:
Greggy uses fallacies in his arguments but an educated person like me is not fooled by it: Reductio ad Hitlerum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum Reductio ad Hitlerum (/ˈhɪtlərəm/; Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's position on the basis that the same view was held by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] One example would be that since Hitler was against smoking, this implies that someone who is against smoking is a Nazi.[4] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:22pm
What a pity for the trumpidiots that renewables, even with trump trying to hamstring them, still provided more than thrice the number of new jobs than fossil fuels during trumps term
now that Biden has released the shackles put on renewables by Trump that figure will jump up. https://morningconsult.com/2020/10/30/renewables-fossil-fuels-jobs-election/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:27pm
on a lighter note..
its just as important though President Joe Biden went to Mass with his family Sunday but stopped the presidential motorcade on the way home so that his son Hunter Biden could make a bagel run. The motorcade stopped for about nine minutes on the way home from church in Georgetown, according to the press pool, as Hunter Biden went to the window of the bagel shop “Call Your Mother” to pick up a takeout order. President Joe Biden remained in the motorcade with Hunter’s daughters Finnegan and Maisy for the duration of the bagel run. Biden’s coronavirus response director Jeff Zients is a major investor in the deli, according to The Atlantic’s Edward-Isaac Dovere. :) :) :) :) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:30pm
I agree cods ...the shame
he should have stopped at mcdonalds :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:32pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:22pm:
I would like to see their methodology. What do they consider fossil fuel jobs? Just the oil rig workers/miners or all of the downstream stuff like petrol stations, power plant workers etc. All part of fossil fuel. ;) I am guessing that renewables workers include the downstream stuff. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:34pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:32pm:
but not the methodology for the numbers that Sprint is touting? Not that you're biased at all ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:49pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:34pm:
I didn't respond to Sprint. ;) But what number where? ;) But more on your piece - "Recent figures show renewable energy employs about 850,000 people in the U.S. (not including some 2.3 million jobs in energy efficiency), as compared to a little more than 1 million in traditional oil, gas and coal. But most of the future job growth is projected to come from clean energy sources." https://www.cbsnews.com/news/renewable-energy-jobs-replacing-fossil-fuel-jobs-oil-wind/ So not just in renewable energy because the piece you quoted said 3.36 million. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:53pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:30pm:
my immediate thought was... HUNTER is n charge.. no one even the Pres would dare say WAIT TILL YOU GET HOME.. I wonder why?...but you carry on smirking |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:01pm
More on fossil fuel jobs -
"Based on a comprehensive analysis of employer data collected in the fourth quarter of 2018, the 2019 USEER finds that the Traditional Energy and Energy Efficiency sectors in 2018 employed approximately 6.7 million Americans out of a workforce of approximately 147 million. " https://www.usenergyjobs.org/2019-report |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:08pm
Cancelling the Keystone XL Pipeline was an election commitment from Biden....The OP was written by the Petroleum institute for their own vested interest....No mention of the environmental impact or the land that would have been claimed if this project went through....Biden is President and he told everyone this would happen if he won the election....This should not be a surprise to anyone and Biden was up front about shutting down the pipeline during the election campaign....Republicans lost the election and cannot block Biden from doing what he promised....Hypocrites!!!
::) ::) ::) https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/20/joe-biden-kills-keystone-xl-pipeline-permit-460555 |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:23pm philperth2010 wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:08pm:
No mention of the environmental damage from oil spills from Warren Buffet's railroad when the inevitable occurs. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:57pm
do you think Joey has already ordered his motorcade FLEET to be electric ?? I am sure he has,,,its the first thing he should do...mrs 1st and second lady can have electric bicycles its what all good leader do isnt it?..
also while I am here do you think he should give the underprivileged those minority groups a BIG discount on electric cars....if oil is so bad its a good idea to get a hurry on with these lego cars. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:59pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:23pm:
Agreed....They should cut oil production and subsidise electric vehicles and charging stations as well as promoting more renewable energy into the market....A win win for the environment and consumers!!! :) :) :) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:02pm philperth2010 wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:59pm:
Ah using that new super fuel Unobtainium? Where is this power generation for the millions of EV's coming from? It ain't solar. And it ain't wind. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:16pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:02pm:
Only Thorium can save our planet: http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1519823686/0#0 |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:41pm cods wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:53pm:
So you think if my kids are hungry and I agree to get them something that means they're in charge? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D dam ell ... I'd hate to be your kid |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:43pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:49pm:
obviously because you're not biased lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:49pm:
the numbers in the OP will do for starters. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:49pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:41pm:
i would hate to have been responsible for your upbringing... HUNTER IS 50.. how long do you expect to be obeying your kids commands.. jump daddy jump >:( >:( >:( >:( |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:04pm cods wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:49pm:
Doesn't matter how old he is. He's in the car with him and they were driving past anyway. If he wanted a bagel why shouldn't he stop and get one? The stupidity you come up with to try and criticise Biden Do you stop doing things for your kids because they're not under 16 anymore? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:05pm
go away its been great without you here.. >:( >:( >:(
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:06pm cods wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:05pm:
it'd be better if you went away. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:14pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 3:22pm:
You missed the past four years, dear, that's all. 29 tril government debt, factory closures, jobs lost to Chi-na, Kim and Iran developing nukes, Chi-na killing America in trade and Putin laughing at the US as he hacks into its entire government network in broad daylight. I left out the part about the 400,000 deaths and an economy in major recession because that's all a hoax, but you get the idea. We will make America great again, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:15pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 4:03pm:
This oil is very expensive to produce and delivers more environmental damage than any other method. Trump was the only politician on either side who was willing to allow it to go ahead. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Jovial Monk on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:17pm
Of course. Sounds like a last-grasp fuel.
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:23pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:43pm:
Lee's not biased, JS. Lee never gave up every principle he once held by shamelessly defending the most corrupt and incompetent administration the US has ever had, oh no. Lee's no Trump-man. He just stands up for honesty and integrity, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:26pm
Joe Biden should give Hunter a job with a security detail let alone free bagels....The Precedent has been set???
;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:29pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:15pm:
Let's be fair, Dnarever. Let's at least give Mr Trump's side here. Mr Trump only allows them to use clean oil and coal. He loves clean air and water. Nobody likes the environment more than Mr Trump, you know, everybody's saying that. That's pretty much everything he's said on the matter. Oh, any objections, and he might say, "come on..." or "that's fake news and you know it", or "that's no way to speak to your president". If you persist, no worries. Mr Trump just walks out. How's Sleepy Joe going to compete with that? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Ayn Marx on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:33pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:29pm:
When did he invent them? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:36pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:23pm:
I've never seen so much denial by such a staunch supporter before .. ever ... for any politician |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:39pm Ayn Marx wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:33pm:
The scientists or the PR strategists? Look, Mr Trump just knows stuff, okay? It runs in the family. He had an uncle at MIT, some hotshot scientist. Mr Trump could have studied medicine at college - he had the grades. He chose to become a property developer instead. He wanted to help people, you see. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:51pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 6:43pm:
Oh so Sprint didn't tout them the OP touted them. So these new fossil fuel sources would not need more workers? They would just shut their wells etc and move the workforce; no matter what life they had left? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Too dumb. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:53pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:51pm:
Like me sprint put up a link. I didn't 'tout' any numbers ... but you're not biased are you? ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:54pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:23pm:
Poor old Karney. Just doesn't get it. I have nowhere endorsed Trump. I have even askeed you to quote me; but it is just "too difficult", it is FD "lousy search engine" and multiple other thing. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:57pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:53pm:
yes Sprint put the OP up. Now if you have trouble with those numbers show us. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D You mean you didn't tout numbers for renewables as opposed to fossil fuels? Liar. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:00pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:15pm:
We can thank this oil for the reduction in price per barrel without it we would be paying over $100 a barrel. Amazing what a bit of competition does it results in Arabs dropping their price. When the competition is wiped out the Arabs will increase their oil prices. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:02pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:57pm:
and yet you asked for the methodology used to get the numbers in my link, whilst not interested in methodology in Sprints. Face it, you're a shill. Stop pretending you're not because no one buys it. You've shown your hypocrisy to many times for your neutrality to be even plausible. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:04pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:15pm:
Link? Dnarever wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:15pm:
Oh the truthful one. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D "The nine Senate Democrats who support the Keystone XL pipeline" https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-nine-senate-democrats-who-support-the-keystone-xl-pipeline-msna719096 |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:05pm Baronvonrort wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:00pm:
' ............. When the competition is wiped out the Arabs will increase their oil prices. ............. ' The laws of Supply and demand apply. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:08pm John Smith wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:02pm:
I did. And then I did your homework for you and showed how distorted your figures were. I can't answer questions about future actions. I am not, unlike you, a NostraDumbArse. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:14pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:05pm:
Amazing what a bit of competition does to oil price. How is that renewable rubbish working in Democrat controlled California? EhWVoxNXkAMHpia_002.jpg (72 KB | 20
) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:14pm
and he is back at war. killing other people.
Quote:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/just-like-good-old-days-joe-biden-invades-syria-convoy-us-troops-choppers-first-full-day-president/?fbclid=IwAR0JHEMBwEz9pHZe-n2X20vMSKwnd8WYlUOJHabPcX8hdR0NyTlaVygjvG8 |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Baronvonrort on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:37pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:14pm:
Why is the US going back into Syria does Joe still want to get rid of Assad? When Joe was VP slavery returned to Syria after the US armed all the radical Jihadis trying to overthrow Assad, most of the people Joe, Obama and Hillary supported and financed defected to the Islamic state. Assad and his father don't support the devout sunnis what did Reagan do when Assads father whacked the muslim brothelhood in 1982? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Hama_massacre Syria was never really a problem until Joe Hillary and Obama fukked it up. messiah_002.jpg (58 KB | 24
) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:17pm |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:23pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:17pm: Surely not? I am buying shares in Asia. Could well short the greenback |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:29pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:17pm: those tax rate changes are scary. I doubt they are true, but it will affect the globe |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:32pm Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:17pm: https://taxfoundation.org/joe-biden-tax-plan-2020/ Quote:
you can see why my alarms bells went riot |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bobby. on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:57pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:23pm:
Just as the Roman empire fell we now see the fall of the US empire. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by John Smith on Jan 25th, 2021 at 10:48pm lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:08pm:
the only thing you did was highlight your bias lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 8:08pm:
and yet you were happy to accept the figures in the OP without looking at the methodology ... Not that you're biased or anything :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 26th, 2021 at 12:41am lee wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 7:54pm:
That's a hoot, Lee, but I'm curious. What do you have against Mr Trump? You haven't said. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 26th, 2021 at 3:28am Bobby. wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 9:57pm:
I am afraid so. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 26th, 2021 at 4:08am philperth2010 wrote on Jan 25th, 2021 at 5:08pm:
Biden kills Keystone XL permit, again Educate yourselves dickheads??? https://www.politico.com/news/2021/01/20/joe-biden-kills-keystone-xl-pipeline-permit-460555 |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by AiA on Jan 26th, 2021 at 5:01am
CHINA has more CLOUT now because Trump walked America off the world stage. Meanwhile, Biden is signing a "Made in America" executive order.
Remember how Obama's executive orders were the end of the world and Donald campaigned against them? So laf. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by mothra on Jan 26th, 2021 at 8:42am
Reading this thread, i'd say Biden has hit the ground running.
Very encouraging. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 26th, 2021 at 10:19am
hes following in Obamas footsteps back to the future ::)
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 26th, 2021 at 10:48am mothra wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 8:42am:
Indeed. Very, very encouraging. And so far, not a single disabled person mocked on TV. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:31am AiA wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 5:01am:
Great news Quote:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/01/25/biden-buy-american-rules/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 26th, 2021 at 1:08pm mothra wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 8:42am:
But which way? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Jan 26th, 2021 at 10:43pm mothra wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 8:42am:
He sure did: Biden Executive Orders: 1. Amnesty to illegal aliens: Will cost 4 million American jobs 2. Cancellation of the pipeline: 1 million jobs 3. $15/hour min wage 2 million job 4. Increases to existing gas taxes 1 million jobs 5. Biden will increase the debt to over $30 trillion 1 million jobs 6. Increase all regulations on businesses 2 million jobs 7. End Fracking and purchase Middle East oil 1 million jobs 8. Green New Deal 6 million jobs 9. Massive environmental Regulations 2 million jobs 10. Massive tax increase to all Americans 1 million jobs The Obama/Biden administration failed to manage our economy when they were in office. Now Biden has another chance to finish what they started. In his first 100 days in office he will kill 21 million jobs. If you voted for Biden, hope you are happy with your decision? Never underestimate Joe's ability to eff things up. -Barack Obama |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:09pm Accusations of child rape (including physical assault and threats to kill the child and/or her parents): Trump - at least one (documents lodged in a New York court). Biden - none. Tell me again why you support Trump :-/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:36pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:09pm:
You just will not look hard enough, Tara Reed and his own daughter show that to be a lie! I'm sure it never occurred to you that people who are fabulously wealthy are accused by opportunists of anything that will give them a huge payday! |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 27th, 2021 at 12:13am Mortdooley wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 10:43pm:
And increased taxes on businesses. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 27th, 2021 at 12:14am Mortdooley wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 11:36pm:
Not a lie at all. T**** is an alleged child rapist. Undeniable fact. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 27th, 2021 at 8:49pm
"New Mexico Officials Taken Aback By Biden Assault On Oil And Gas
David Blackmon Senior Contributor Energy Officials in the state of New Mexico professed to be taken aback last week by President Joe Biden’s day-one decision to impose a 60-day moratorium on all oil and gas-related leasing and permitting actions on federal lands. It is a decision that will have major ramifications on the state budgets of New Mexico and other Western states, especially if it is extended beyond its initial term and backed up by Biden’s promised ban on hydraulic fracturing on federal lands. A little more than 2 years ago, in September, 2018, I wrote about the half-billion dollar windfall the State of New Mexico had just received during the course of a single sale of oil and gas leases on federal lands in the state. Those federal leases lie in the segment of the Permian Basin that spills over from Texas into the southeastern portion of New Mexico, part of the Delaware Basin play area that has become the hottest oil play in North America since 2016. Like other oil and gas-producing western states, vast swaths of lands in New Mexico are owned by the federal government…" "Some New Mexico officials are now trying to defend themselves by saying they didn’t anticipate the new President would issue such a ban, but such protests ring rather hollow given that they most assuredly did understand that Biden plans to move ahead with his fracking ban, which would for all intents and purposes have the same effect." "[T]he reality is that [New Mexico’s Democratic Governor, Michelle Lujan Grisham] and her administration can strive to “diversify” the state’s energy portfolio all they want, but the state will still lose hundreds of millions of dollars every year should the Biden administration succeed in shutting down her state’s oil and gas business. To be clear: Neither the state nor the federal government collects any royalties on solar installations or wind farms. There is no severance tax to be collected from those alternative forms of energy with which to fund the state’s schools or hospitals, or to sustain the free in-state college tuition program Lujan herself established in 2019 thanks to New Mexico’s new Permian/Delaware Basin windfall." "These are just some of the actual potential costs of the Biden assault on the New Mexico oil industry. They are the things that happen in the real world, as opposed to the fantasies pushed by many politicians." https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidblackmon/2021/01/24/new-mexico-officials-taken-aback-by-biden-assault-on-oil-and-gas/?sh=4349b3b73db7 But back in 2019 - "IPANM, Reuters & OilPrice.com (Nov. 1, 2019) – While IPANM would have serious concerns if a newly-elected President would seek a nationwide fracking ban, we are encouraged that New Mexico Governor Lujan Grisham recognizes the importance of fracking to sustain the state economy. The linked article below contains the following quotes from Gov. Lujan Grisham. “Without the energy effort in this state, no one gets to make education the top priority,” said New Mexico Democratic Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham in Santa Fe on October 8. If Trump loses next year’s election, she said in a later interview, she would request the Democratic president provide her state a waiver exempting it from any drilling ban “to allow us to continue to produce in New Mexico.” " https://ipanm.org/2019/11/01/governor-lujan-grisham-would-seek-fracking-ban-waiver-if-warren-or-sanders-elected/ Wow. She wants a waiver for her state. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Jan 27th, 2021 at 9:48pm
Judge blocks enforcement of 100-day deportation moratorium
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton declared victory on Twitter. A federal judge has blocked enforcement of a 100-day deportation moratorium, issuing a temporary restraining order after the state of Texas lodged a lawsuit last week regarding a Department of Homeland Security memo that called for pausing most removals. Acting Secretary of Homeland Security David Pekoske signed a memo instructing immigration authorities to direct attention towards national security and public safety risks and individuals caught coming into the nation unlawfully after Nov. 1, according to the Associated Press, which noted this represented a significant shift from the Trump-era policy that anybody in the nation unlawfully represented a removal priority. The moratorium became active on Friday and encompassed almost all people who came to America without authorization prior to last November, according to the outlet. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton declared victory on Twitter: "Within 6 days of Biden's inauguration, Texas has HALTED his illegal deportation freeze. *This* was a seditious left-wing insurrection. And my team and I stopped it," the Lone Star State official wrote. VICTORY.Texas is the FIRST state in the nation to bring a lawsuit against the Biden Admin. AND WE WON.Within 6 days of Biden’s inauguration, Texas has HALTED his illegal deportation freeze. *This* was a seditious left-wing insurrection. And my team and I stopped it.— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) January 26, 2021 People will continue to find their way home as long as the law is followed. There is a right way and a wrong way to come here, follow the law and everything will be fine! |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 28th, 2021 at 3:48pm Mortdooley wrote on Jan 27th, 2021 at 9:48pm:
thank goodness |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 28th, 2021 at 3:54pm
Dow Jones Industrial Average
INDEXDJX: .DJI −633.87 (2.05%) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Fuzzball on Jan 28th, 2021 at 4:24pm cods wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 10:19am:
Not sure about 'following' cods, Nobama and the other criminal Hillary are without doubt pulling his strings. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 28th, 2021 at 4:28pm
" Consistent with the goals of the President’s Build Back Better jobs and economic recovery plan, of which his clean energy jobs plan is a central pillar, the order directs the federal agencies to procure carbon pollution-free electricity and clean, zero-emission vehicles to create good-paying, union jobs and stimulate clean energy industries.
In addition, the order requires those purchases be Made in America, following President Biden’s Buy American executive order. The order also directs agencies to apply and strictly enforce the prevailing wage and benefit guidelines of the Davis Bacon and other acts and encourage Project Labor Agreements. These actions reaffirm that agencies should work to ensure that any jobs created with funds to address the climate crisis are good jobs with a choice to join a union. The order directs each federal agency to develop a plan to increase the resilience of its facilities and operations to the impacts of climate change and directs relevant agencies to report on ways to expand and improve climate forecast capabilities – helping facilitate public access to climate related information and assisting governments, communities, and businesses in preparing for and adapting to the impacts of climate change. The order directs the Secretary of the Interior to pause on entering into new oil and natural gas leases on public lands or offshore waters to the extent possible, launch a rigorous review of all existing leasing and permitting practices related to fossil fuel development on public lands and waters, and identify steps that can be taken to double renewable energy production from offshore wind by 2030. The order does not restrict energy activities on lands that the United States holds in trust for Tribes. The Secretary of the Interior will continue to consult with Tribes regarding the development and management of renewable and conventional energy resources, in conformance with the U.S. government’s trust responsibilities. The order directs federal agencies to eliminate fossil fuel subsidies as consistent with applicable law and identify new opportunities to spur innovation, commercialization, and deployment of clean energy technologies and infrastructure. Rebuild Our Infrastructure for a Sustainable Economy The order catalyzes the creation of jobs in construction, manufacturing, engineering and the skilled-trades by directing steps to ensure that every federal infrastructure investment reduces climate pollution and that steps are taken to accelerate clean energy and transmission projects under federal siting and permitting processes in an environmentally sustainable manner. Advance Conservation, Agriculture, and Reforestation The order commits to the goal of conserving at least 30 percent of our lands and oceans by 2030 and launches a process for stakeholder engagement from agricultural and forest landowners, fishermen, Tribes, States, Territories, local officials, and others to identify strategies that will result in broad participation. The order also calls for the establishment of a Civilian Climate Corps Initiative to put a new generation of Americans to work conserving and restoring public lands and waters, increasing reforestation, increasing carbon sequestration in the agricultural sector, protecting biodiversity, improving access to recreation, and addressing the changing climate. The order directs the Secretary of Agriculture to collect input from farmers, ranchers, and other stakeholders on how to use federal programs to encourage adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices that produce verifiable carbon reductions and sequestrations and create new sources of income and jobs for rural Americans." https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/01/27/fact-sheet-president-biden-takes-executive-actions-to-tackle-the-climate-crisis-at-home-and-abroad-create-jobs-and-restore-scientific-integrity-across-federal-government/ Well I guess the nuclear fleet will be ok but warplanes and tanks are a bust. BUT.. the manufacturers of EV's will be delighted. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by cods on Jan 28th, 2021 at 4:58pm Fuzzball wrote on Jan 28th, 2021 at 4:24pm:
nanc isnt doing a bas job....he is pretending he doesnt know anything about the second impeachment..... if at first you dont succeed try try try again....thats nancys motto.. ;) ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Jan 28th, 2021 at 8:58pm mothra wrote on Jan 26th, 2021 at 8:42am:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqAcZOpdzrk Who do you think is talking to Biden in that ear piece telling him what to say? "Salute the Marine" "I don't know what I am signing". When he lacks instructions he runs out of the room. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:41am
The heart of the real threat to American democracy in 2021: the complicity of the country’s dominant institutions in overriding ordinary checks and balances to ensure the success of their own preferred political program.
Trump’s freedom of manoeuver has always been hampered by a hostile press, an independent judiciary, civil society organisations and even an interventionist deep state. But Joe Biden will take office next week with the unquestioning endorsement of all of these institutions, and control of both houses of congress to boot. Who, then, will hold Biden to account? https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/democracy-more-at-risk-with-no-brake-on-joe-biden/news-story/643e12a79d23f68bd33700c17484f41e |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 12:53pm
"Jennifer Granholm, President Joe Biden’s nominee to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, insisted Wednesday that “clean energy” jobs will replace those that “might be sacrificed.”
Granholm’s remarks came during questioning from Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), who pointed out the significant loss of American jobs due to a long-term ban on oil, gas, and coal leasing and permitting on federal lands. “A long-term ban on oil and gas leasing would cost 62,000 jobs in New Mexico, 33,000 jobs in Wyoming, and 18,000 jobs in Colorado,” Barrasso said to Granholm. Asked how a ban would be “consistent” with Biden’s message of unity and job creation, Granholm said, “I think the president’s plan of building back better, which would create more jobs in energy, clean energy, than the jobs that might be sacrificed.” “But I will say this, we don’t want to see any jobs sacrificed,” Granholm added, saying she must work together with “those states that have these jobs in abundance.” Granholm also stated that the “licenses that currently are operating are not going to be disrupted,” saying that they will “continue to operate.” " https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2021/01/27/biden-energy-nominee-jennifer-granholm-clean-energy-jobs-will-replace-ones-that-might-be-sacrificed/ So these high paying green jobs - Are they available now BEFORE they reduce fossil fuelled jobs? If so why aren't more people leaving? Those put out of work lose homes. Those that are made homeless may react. And it won't be just Republicans hurt. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 5:19pm Frank wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:41am:
Both houses of Congress (sic), eh? You mean like Dear Leader had, along with all those personally-appointed judges who, yes, held him to account by upholding the results of a free and transparent election? Poor old Dear Leader, refrained from installing himself as Caesar. Yes, I imagine Sleepy Joe will recieve the unquestioning endorsement of all the organs of state, given he won the presidency by seven million votes. There there. You join the Murdoch press and have a good old cry. After four years of your Dear Leader, you've earned it, no? So unfair, innit. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 5:54pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 12:53pm:
That's true, Lee. Plenty of them voted for Sleepy Joe, no? If they were listening, they'd have heard Sleepy Joe's not shutting down any current fossil fuel projects. He's denying new leases for fracking in national parks and on government land. Still, there's a market for porkies, but do you know? Putting Biden in the White House has just stopped a good, oh I don't know, 23.3 lies a day. Check it out: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarkowitz/2020/05/05/trump-is-lying-more-than-ever-just-look-at-the-data/ There's now a president and a press secretary who come out each day to discuss things called facts. Uncanny, no? Journalists get to ask things called questions and get things called answers. Imagine, it doesn't even matter which publication or broadcaster they're from. Even CNN, CNBC, the Washington Post and New York Times get answers. And no walk-outs. Biden hasn't walked off yet. No attacks on the lying, fake news media or anything. I know how attentive you'll be, Lee, given your interest in the facts, but I do hope the leftards don't get too excited. It can't last forever. It won't take much - a school shooting, a wild weather event, a fiscal crisis. Someone's bound to discover Trump's debt, which will quickly become Biden's debt. It won't be long before Joe's telling the media to, like, come on, man... They did it to Clinton, they did it to Obama, and they definitely did it to Hillary. Sure, Mr Trump's off Twitter for a bit, so there's no Trump re-tweets of Pizzagate stories or Michelle Obama being a man, but Biden's honeymoon can't last forever. You're no Trump supporter, Lee, so you'll be pleased to see facts return to the White House, but I wouldn't get too used to it if I was you. You watch, it won't take Tucker and Hannity and Judge Jeanine to start the on-air hissy fits going again. All Obama had to do was appear in a tan suit. I know, I know, a tan suit? In the Oval Office? On a black man? Ridiculous, but what do you expect? They're leftards. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:23pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 5:54pm:
And the federal Government get the most of the lease fees. The states between 12% and 16%. Then there is the royalties. No new federal lands means no new federal taxes. The shortfall must be made up somewhere. And it is not just fracking it is new leases period. "From my first post - "Officials in the state of New Mexico professed to be taken aback last week by President Joe Biden’s day-one decision to impose a 60-day moratorium on all oil and gas-related leasing and permitting actions on federal lands. " " https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidmarkowitz/2020/05/05/trump-is-lying-more-than-ever-just-look-at-the-data/ Nothing there about banning fracking or leasing. ;) So I suppose you can show us where I am wrong? Or not. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:38pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:23pm:
I don't have to show you where you're wrong, dear. I'm free to post whatever I feel. You? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:45pm Quote:
Yes and hasn't he been going well. All the MAGA tears are the give away. Male, American, Gropers, Association. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:58pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:38pm:
Of course petal. You always have. It doesn't need any truthfulness. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 7:56pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:58pm:
No worries, we'll play truth or dare. Me first. Why were you never a Trump supporter, dear? You havent said. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 7:58pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 7:56pm:
The same as I'm not a Biden supporter. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 8:05pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 7:58pm:
Oh, I see. You're not American. Very droll, dear. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 8:58pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 8:05pm:
How very true. Perhaps I don't need to treat you like a computer. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:30pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 8:58pm:
You most certainly should not. Feel free to own up to your admiration and support for the worst prez the US has ever seen though. There's no need to quibble over whether you actually voted for him. We know that, dear, just as we also know you get access to the Murdoch media in Western Australia. If it helps, we sympathise. Don't we all? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:46pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:30pm:
Not in remote WA. Try again petal. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:49pm lee wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:46pm:
Thanks for the clarification, dear. You don't have access to the Murdoch media in Western Australia. Oh... |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:57pm
The West Australian is not Murdoch. ;)
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Ye Grappler on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:58pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 6:45pm:
Have no fears - sweet Karamala will fix it all once Old White Joe collapses in the seat... and the democrats can have their 'statement' about the first non-white woman Prez.... then we can all go back to sleep - though Australia's experiment with that 'first woman PM' still echoes in the empty halls of integrity and virtue and the legacy lives on.... her party still cannot win an election no matter how unlosable..... Trump Return in 2024....... once the American people realise that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans can stop this vile Covid in its tracks no matter how much they carry on about it... I'm surprised Old White Joe lasted that first week without falling into his coffin... |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Mix_Master on Jan 30th, 2021 at 8:03am Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:58pm:
Dream on... I suspect that - irrespective of what happens with the impeachment business - Trump's finished politically. The Republicans have a big decision to make (assuming Trump is able to run again). Continue to "tie" their Party to "Brand Trump" (and all it stands for), or to move in a different direction. If they decide on the latter, they'll have no shortage of candidates jockeying for position...and THAT could have a major impact on the way people vote in the impeachment trial (which would probably spell curtains for Trump's political ambitions). |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Jan 30th, 2021 at 10:05am Big Donger wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 5:19pm:
That's the number of votes they faked from 3 am on 4 Nov for the next 4 weeks. They never bothered to fake a similar number for Congress and the Senate. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 30th, 2021 at 10:43am Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 10:05am:
And here we have the old boy, devout Spectator reader, in his new role of Qanon propagandist. Watch, as he remembers the great legal minds of the Trump era: Roger Stone, Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani. Laugh, as he revisits Four Seasons Landscaping, Rudy's hair dye performance and other great moments in American democracy. Thrill, as he cheers on the Capitol riots. Cry, as he struggles to find a reason why, after everything the Donald said and did, the old boy still holds his Dear Leader in his heart. But that's the old boy. Supported the invasion of Iraq to spread the love, saw the folly of his ways, and gave his heart to Dear Leader, celebrity property developer, ex-Miss Universe owner, star of the hit TV series the Apprentice, and finally, President of the United States of America. We'll win so much we'll grow tired of winning, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:03am Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Jan 29th, 2021 at 9:58pm:
Quote:
You are better than this, The Camala scare is among the dumbest scare campaigns that was run. Quote:
Nobody claimed to stop it in its tracks just to kill a few hundred thousand less. Trump has gone any luck he will never return. His next term should come with a free orange jumpsuit and lovely striped pyjamas. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:05am Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 10:05am:
Faked? :o Has someone told Rudy? :-/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:17am Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 10:05am:
Still being silly I see. No votes were faked Just legal votes being counted. The cheat is the idea of just stopping to count votes when you are in front |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 30th, 2021 at 12:22pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:03am:
You are better than this, The Camila scare is among the dumbest scare campaigns that was run.[/quote] Sure, but it comes with a pseudonym, Karamala. Cunning, no? Here we the use of onomatopoeia to merge the name Karmala with the sticky brown confection, caramel. It's a scare campaign that comes with a direct reference to Karmala's tintedness. We also have the adjective sweet, used ironically to infer its opposite: someone tough, shrewd and calculating. It directly targets gender in an attempt to undermine femininity. Put together, in two words, we have a scare campaign based solely on race and gender. The tottering, clueless incumbent, Sleepy Joe, and his ambitious offsider, Sweet Karamela, a not-quite-black woman (she's caramel), but hardly sweet. She's a ball-buster, she's bitter, and she's got power. These two words describe everything Trump was tasked to defeat - the threat of Hillary, a ball-buster, and the legacy of Obama, a black man. In Sweet Karamela, we have both: the pants-suit and the tintedness. She represents everything Trump came to extinguish. Karmala Harris is the very embodiment of everything Trump supporters fear. No, Dnarever, the Grappler is not better than that. He only supports Trump to rid the world of its Sweet Karamelas. It doesn't matter what Trump does - actively supports dictators, racks up 20 trillion in debt, presides over the highest covid toll in the world and incites his followers to storm his own government - Trump is the last white bastion against uppity tinted broads like Sweet Karamela. It might be dumb, but it's one of the oldest scare campaigns in the book. Think of Sleepy Mark Anthony and Sweet Cleomelapatra - Julius Caesar used both in his own propaganda campaign to defeat Anthony and take control of the empire. Like Trump, Julius Caesar is known for his own assault upon a republic. Caesar's failed too, but it didn't take long to do away with elected representatives and usher in the Dark Ages of Western Civilization. Sweet Karamela has a similar purpose, a use of onomatopoeia that captures just how close we are to losing the lot. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Jan 30th, 2021 at 5:46pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:17am:
No functioning voting system stops at 3 am, everyone is sent home, and on resumption the loser jumps miraculously to the lead. Then the count continues for weeks, waiting for the operatives to fill in enough to put the guy nobody could actually turn up to hear in the WH. Those operatives had no time to vote in similar proportions in congressional or senate choice because they had to focus on faking just the presidential votes. Why else are the Dems not similarly WAAAAAY ahead in those chambers?? This would be unthinkable in other, uncorrupted electoral systems. But Tammany Hall, like Lenin, lived, lives, and will live in Dem controlled jurisdictions in the US. The Dems now want all election to be as fakeable as this one so they are pushing for more of the same. Nobody with any respect for true democracy is pushing for MORE fakeable postal votes. Only the poncy pelosy Dems do. And they will cancel your book deal if you disagree, demand that you be made a non-person. 1984 was first a distopian satire but now it's the left's operating manual. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:03pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 5:46pm:
Full-blown retard. You have to ask. However did they win? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:07pm Big Donger wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:03pm:
They cheated. They always do. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:09pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:07pm:
That's deep, old boy. 3am, innit. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:12pm
Ki
Big Donger wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:09pm:
You are ducking and squirming, paki, like always. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:38pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:12pm:
Oh, I know. Ducking and squirming from erection results Dear Leader's Secretary of State called "the most secure ever", Dear Leader's chief sychophant Attorney General said "there is no evidence of widespread electoral fraud, period," went through Republican-led audits and recounts in most of the contested states, was upheld in 60 legal suits, mostly by Dear Leader-appointed judges, including the Supreme Court, who could find no reason whatsoever to question it. I'm reeling, dear boy. 3am, is it? How cute. If only Hillary had come up with that in 2016 instead of conceeding on the night and telling her supporters to "give Donald a go". If only Mitt Romney and John McCain and Al Gore had thought up that, demanded loyal state governors find them extra votes, plotted military coups in the Oval Office, schemed to sack his second Attorney General for not breaking the law, and when all was said and done, incited a riot at the Capitol to threaten "weak" Republicans into submission and intimidate the Vice Prez to vote on a technicality to stall. Tell us all about the virtues of being such a superior, jolly conservative again, old boy, upholding such enduring values and unquestionable morality. Truth, justice, the American way. We knew you were just having a laugh. But that never stopped us having a chuckle ourselves, dear boy - at you. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:50pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 5:46pm:
Quote:
The first problem you face is in that this didn't actually happen. People went home in two major scenarios, their shift ended or their function was complete. The people actually counting remained to continue counting votes. You guys even posted film of this happening. This stop the vote counting theory had been long debunked. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:56pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 5:46pm:
Quote:
The dumb Democrats made the election about getting rid of Trump and a pile of republicans agreed and voted against Trump. This led to the position where many of the same people who voted against trump were comfortable to vote republican in the other areas. The Democrats were too dumb to campaign against the rest of the incompetent corrupt Trump supporting representatives. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:57pm Frank wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 6:07pm:
Have you told Rudy? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Jan 30th, 2021 at 8:02pm greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:57pm:
Rudy is busy trying to get a $1.3 billion loan. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by greggerypeccary on Jan 30th, 2021 at 8:36pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 8:02pm:
Lol ;D I hope he tucks his shirt in before he goes to the bank. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Ye Grappler on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:08pm
This'll get 'em.....
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 30th, 2021 at 11:39pm Dnarever wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 8:02pm:
Or he could produce the evidence he claims to possess??? :-? :-? :-? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 31st, 2021 at 12:03am Dnarever wrote on Jan 30th, 2021 at 7:50pm:
Oh look, the old boy - 3am - has gone. As if he doesn't know that every single vote counted was observed. They even displayed monitors, with lots of little observers sitting around, some of which were streamed online. Don't play shurely shome mishtake with the old boy. He knows, every schoolboy knows. Have a banana - have two. Have one for the old boy, who's safely back in his coffin until 3am, when nurse comes calling. The old boy's just TRIGGERED. He'll get over it, he always does. Every good boy deserves fruit, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 5:07pm
"Commerce Secretary Nominee Remains Open To Funding Biden’s Climate Agenda With Tax Hikes On The Middle Class"
https://dailycaller.com/2021/01/26/commerce-secretary-nominee-open-funding-biden-climate-agenda-tax-hikes-middle-class/ How to decrease the size of the middle class? Increase taxes and make them part of the lower class. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 31st, 2021 at 7:49pm
Wondering where in that video she actualls says the phrase open to raising taxes on the middle class
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 31st, 2021 at 7:50pm
Plus the Daily Caller isn't what I'd call the least biased source running around, hence the interpretation on what she said
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 31st, 2021 at 7:59pm lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 5:07pm:
well, the money has to come from somewhere. poor people don't have it. Rich people don't pay tax . |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:09pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 7:59pm:
I mean getting the rich to pay for it would be grand. But thats socialist redistribution iof wealth apparently |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:19pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 7:50pm:
Of course you can find some rebuttal? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Or listen hear and tell us it was all untrue. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-secretary-of-commerce-nominee-gina-raimondo-testifies-in-senate-confirmation-hearing |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:26pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:09pm:
Bezos wouldn't wear that. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:30pm lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:19pm:
Mate you put the source up and I'm telling you on that video provided she said nothing about middle class taxes. If she did say it put up the source |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:32pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:09pm:
It would be, yes. It's pretty hard to get money off rich people though. That is why they are rich. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:38pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:30pm:
How about Town hall then? "During her confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill this week, Biden Commerce Secretary nominee Gina Raimondo admitted Democrats will have to raise taxes on all Americans, including the middle and lower class, in order to pay for President Biden's "climate" agenda. "Let me say this, I as governor am deeply in touch with how much increasing bills affect the average American family. Having said that, we do need to meet the climate change challenge and we need funds for improved infrastructure," Raimondo said. "I would look to balance those interests." https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/01/27/biden-commerce-secretary-admits-we-need-to-raise-taxes-on-poor-americans-to-pay-for-climate-n2583785 Of course you could try snopes. ;) It is amazing really. Sometimes Daily caller is ok sometimes not. I guess it depends on the story. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:36pm lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:38pm:
Townhall??? ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Mjölnir on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:46pm philperth2010 wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:36pm:
I have no idea what townhall.com is, can you enlighten me? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:47pm philperth2010 wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:36pm:
You could listen to the one hour video of the confirmation hearing petal. ;) You just like to shoot the messenger. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:50pm Setanta wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 9:46pm:
Sure!!! https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/townhall/ https://www.allsides.com/news-source/townhall-bias ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Jan 31st, 2021 at 10:12pm
So tell us petal who you DO believe. Reddit? Newsmax? Someone else. ;)
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by rhino on Jan 31st, 2021 at 10:30pm lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:38pm:
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Jan 31st, 2021 at 11:14pm lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:38pm:
You don't get the Daily Caller in WA, dear. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:28am Big Donger wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 11:14pm:
And yet no one has actually debunked the story. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:30am lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:28am:
No ones actually proved it either to be fair. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by aquascoot on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:35am lee wrote on Jan 31st, 2021 at 8:26pm:
:D :D :D :D bingo, the worlds second richest man wouldnt wear that. and he is amongst the wokest of the woke dont want those lefties coming after the $$$. and biden sees an all electric future for motor vehicles. care to tell the middle classes about where he will be coming up with the $$$$ to offset the losses in fuel tax? maybe from the middle classes ? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 12:45pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:30am:
Another one - "Joe Biden’s commerce secretary nominee Gina Raimondo revealed that she’s receptive to raising taxes on the poorest Americans to help fund the left’s radical climate agenda. During the confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) asked how Raimondo, the current Democrat Rhode Island governor, felt about a Democrat proposal to impose a gas tax on Americans, including low-income families. “As Governor, I’m deeply in touch with how much increasing bills affect the average American family,” she began. “Having said that, we do need to, um, meet the climate change challenge and we need funds for improved infrastructure.” " https://www.newswars.com/bidens-commerce-secretary-nominee-says-shes-open-to-tax-hike-for-poorest-americans-to-fund-climate-agenda/ So the AVERAGE American family will need to be hit. Which according to Joe is those on less than $400k. And still nothing out there rebutting what was written. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 1st, 2021 at 12:51pm
As Governor, I’m deeply in touch with how much increasing bills affect the average American family,” she began. “Having said that, we do need to, um, meet the climate change challenge and we need funds for improved infrastructure.” "
Can you point where in that statement she says raising taxes. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 1:05pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 12:45pm:
Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 12:51pm:
Poor petal. Just how do you think they are going to fund "the climate change challenge"? She mentions "the average American family" and "having said that we do need to meet the climate change challenge". So exactly what is she proposing? Magical unicorn farts for funding? No can't be that, she hasn't mentioned unicorns. I guess that leaves the "average American Family" as they are the only ones mentioned. Perhaps you can find someone who disagrees with that assessment. I mean I had a look this morning and there was no one saying that the interpretation is wrong. Surely you can find someone to support your proposition. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:21pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 12:45pm:
Newswars??? [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/newswars/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:22pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:21pm:
I see you haven't found a site for rebuttal yet. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:22pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 1:05pm:
I view it as awide range of possible interpretations. Maybe they'll ta the middle class, maybe they won't. Personally, contrarian, they should tax the wealthy. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:26pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:22pm:
So why just mention "average American families"? Not the "wealthy"? I guess we can add Tom Steyer wouldn't like it to the list that includes Bezos. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:28pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:26pm:
I suspect what shes doing is basically playing the contrarian movement looking for poor interpretations in everything she says. The same type of mentality thinking children are being kidnapped and bled for adrenochrome under a pizza shop. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:32pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:22pm:
It's bullshit....You question SBS, The ABC, CNN and every other news outlet that is not a right wing conspiracy site (infowars / newswars)....Post a link to a site that calls itself news and is bound by the code of practice you dickhead....Your source is worthless!!! ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:36pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:32pm:
Poor petal. very butt hurt. Can't even get his precious left wing media to can it. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:48pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:36pm:
No site accept Alex Jones will touch it....Why am I not surprised you believe a dickhead like Alex Jones....The reason no "news" outlet will publish this crap is because there is a charter about honesty in news....Not even Fox would touch this crap....Opinion pieces from right wing conspiracy sites is all you can produce to support your bullshit....You are an idiot!!! Quote:
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/03/30/us/alex-jones-psychosis-sandy-hook/index.html [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:03pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:48pm:
Wow. Talk about desperation. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D BTW - When have I queried SBS? I mean I do the ABC and climate change but that's about all. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:05pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:03pm:
Alex Jones!!! [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:06pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:05pm:
Is he on ABC country? ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:12pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:06pm:
Alex Jones owns newswars which is who you quoted....The article citing Jones is a nut case was posted to show you are following a complete dickhead....Why did you try to pass of ABC country as supporting your bullshit when all it did was confirm Jones is a lying dickhead like you!!! :-? :-? :-? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:20pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:06pm:
No - BBC Wales.... |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:26pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:12pm:
Does he? philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:12pm:
All i asked was if he was ABC country. I listen to that when the cricket is on and I am traveling. Where did I say ABC country supported Jones? ::) ::) You are really losing the plot petal. And as I previously wrote you can listen to her confirmation hearing yourself. It's not that hard. I even included the link. ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:28pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:28pm:
So here she is a highly qualified investment banker and doesn't know how to talk straight? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 4:28pm:
Do you think that. I suggest you see a trick cyclist NOW. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 6:16pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 5:26pm:
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:05pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 6:16pm:
The video shows her being asked about the Gas Tax that the Democrats have installed. "Gas tax hike part of House Democrats' transportation plan" https://apnews.com/article/washington-transportation-d46b26883b63e5948b8c93bc4556c8fb But you probably don't like that site either. Then she says she is " deeply in touch with how much increasing bills affect the average American family.” So tell us petal do taxes on fuel hit the poor and middle class effectively more than the rich? isn't it a tax on the poor and middle class that will hurt them more than the rich? Or maybe USnews https://apnews.com/article/washington-transportation-d46b26883b63e5948b8c93bc4556c8fb |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:46pm
This sounds like a very good proposal to improve infrastructure and lower carbon emissions!!!
Quote:
[smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] https://www.heraldnet.com/news/house-democrats-lay-out-massive-26b-transportation-package/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:54pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:46pm:
And bugger Biden's promise of no new taxes for those on less than 400K. Oh you probably want to go with "it's not a new tax"? Despite it not having increased in 28 years. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by aquascoot on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:57pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:46pm:
your out of your mind phillip. america needs a work ethic to rival the chinese not some touchy feeley leftie motherhood statements |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 8:02pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:57pm:
The Americans need to face reality and take responsibility for their actions....Not everyone thinks science is crap mate....At last someone is taking action to lower emissions in America!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 8:20pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 8:02pm:
So tell us exactly what climate science has got right. Not models; even an ensemble of them can't get it right. ;) But I'm glad you have accepted that those on less than 400k will be taxed more. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 9:15pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 8:20pm:
https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ Your welcome!!! [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] [smiley=thumbsup.gif] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 1st, 2021 at 9:25pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 9:15pm:
Oh that's rich. All those 97% papers. Actually one was 100%. Except she later showed her workings out. And unless paper specifically said that there was NO evidence of a human element in GW then it wasn't counted. Voila 100%. And then John Cook's 97.2% of 32%. Just too funny. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Edit: Science isn't about consensus; that's politics. If it is consensus it can't be science as only one person needs to show it wrong. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 1st, 2021 at 10:33pm lee wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 9:25pm:
You think you are that one person....Governments are acting despite your objections and cherry picking bullshit....NASA have more credibility than you who as posted no scientific papers to support your crap....Your opinion is worthless!!! ::) ::) ::) https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Feb 1st, 2021 at 10:33pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:57pm:
Why does the solution always put workers on third world conditions and wages ? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:34pm aquascoot wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 7:57pm:
Correct me if I'm wrong, dear, but you said America needs to vibe with the prez who started his day at 11am, spent an average of three hours a day in the Oval Office, worked four day weeks, and spent the rest of his time playing golf, tweeting and watching TV. And not because of any great legislative plans, action or agenda, but because he set an example for the nation. What were you saying about touchie-feelie motherhood statements again? Oh, that's right. DRAIN THE SWAMP. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 1st, 2021 at 11:59pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 10:33pm:
Because it gives them something to bounce of of bed for. You? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:04am
Biden Will Shatter Our Economy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQAN0mzqhk8 Don't act like we didn't all see this coming. Who do you think is giving Biden orders through his ear piece? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bias_2012 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 1:06am Mortdooley wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:04am:
"Turdging"! ... yeah, I like that description Mort, taxes will rise, get ready for them, they will be "gottya over a barrel" taxes - tax increases on things you can't do without and are necessary for your car, home and work The increases will likely be small, almost unnoticeable, because many millions of US citizens will be paying them But they could end up being incremental, and each time, the gullible will say "Oh, that wasn't much of an increase" Biden, will then bring in a standard/increased basic income for all workers, so they can afford the taxes Employers will have to cut back on staff due to higher employee overheads. Small businesses will find it hard to stay in business. Large companies will start to take over and drive small businesses into the ground Unemployment will rise, so Biden might abandon the time limit on payout of unemployment cheques per unemployed person, and increase the unemployment handout The RINOS will be in agreement with all this Biden destruction, they are as bad as the Democrats - traitorous Globalists! |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Mix_Master on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:23am Bias_2012 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 1:06am:
It's the same as here in Oz. The LNP "Best money managers" have raised our Public Debt to near a trillion bucks. Eventually, Labor will need to come in and work towards paying that debt down. Seems only yesterday that Abbott and Co. were screaming "Debt and Deficit Disaster", and then decrying Labor's borrowing to stimulate economic activity when such stimulus was needed, during the GFC, and that same Party has raised Public Debt to eye-watering levels. As always, it's only OK when "they" do it... Nothing quite like the smell of hypocrisy in the morning... ::) Same with Trump. Gave a sugar hit to an already stimulated economy (which he inherited), and ran up a truckload of debt effectively pump-priming the stock market and share buybacks. Now, his "followers" are decrying the fact that someone - Biden, most likely - is going to have to raise taxes in order to begin paying some of that money back, as well as pay for services, and begin transitioning the economy to something a bit "greener"*. *Not that he's the only one, mind. I note that GM - off their own "bat", so to speak - are planning to phase out production of ICE-powered vehicles by 2035. Do they believe in AGW? Or are they (like others) "reading the tea leaves"? https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a35352321/gm-eliminate-gas-vehicles-2035/ |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bojack Horseman on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:25am Mortdooley wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:04am:
Is that serial pervert still on TV? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 10:45am Mortdooley wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:04am:
Oh, I'd say Darkie, Mort, for sure. But do you know? We predicted Dear Leader would be an economic disaster and you said ooh. We even showed the accounting by Price Waterhouse: Hillary versus Trump, with his tax cuts and expensive promises. Trump, of course, surpassed even that. Who could tell Trump would triple the government deficit in one term - before covid? I hate talking politics, but the jury's out. Trump turned Obama's GFC deficit of 9 tril into a deficit of 29 - in one term, before covid. Obama picked up a global financial crisis and turned it around. George W Bush took a Clinton surplus and spent it on war. Clinton took on a George HW deficit and turned it into a surplus, and on and on it goes. Read my lips: no new taxes, no? Democrat presidents have been cleaning up after Republican deficits since WWII. Biden's left with the mess created by Trump. Now forgive me, Mort, for taking your predictions with a grain of salt. We will make America great again, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Bias_2012 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 11:51am Mix_Master wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:23am:
That's right, it's International Socialism, all western nations are adopting it. Stalin had no need to worry about it becoming international and now, Biden and the Rinos are helping it along like the Libs and Labs are doing here Problem is, and as Morrison said yesterday, "We can't run the country on taxpayers money (stimulus) forever" - Socialism runs out of other peoples' money "Socialism" is "Famine" Where's the "Feast" in Biden's anti-business policies? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Mix_Master on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:41pm Bias_2012 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 11:51am:
Where's the response to the LNP raising Public Debt to a trillion dollars, that's what I want to know. Have things somehow changed in the last decade, from an "all debt is bad" ('cos Labor racked it up staving off a recession during the GFC), to an "all debt is good" thing, ('cos the LNP racked more of it up)? Do have anything to say about that? Or is that better ignored? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:53pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 10:33pm:
No I don't. There are climate skeptics out there with far more qualifications than mine. philperth2010 wrote on Feb 1st, 2021 at 10:33pm:
And yet you cite NASA Consensus.. And I have even shown where those of the supposed 97% claims are in fact wrong. But you believe them implicitly. Now that makes you a dickhead. From Cook et al 2013 with additions for the number of papers found to mach their descriptor - 1,Explicitly endorses and quantifies AGW as 50+% : 64 2,Explicitly endorses but does not quantify or minimize: 922 3,Implicitly endorses AGW without minimizing it: 2910 4,No Position: 7970 5,Implicitly minimizes/rejects AGW: 54 6,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW but does not quantify: 15 7,Explicitly minimizes/rejects AGW as less than 50%: 9 https://www.econlib.org/archives/2014/03/16_not_97_agree.html So just 64 papers out of 11,944 reckoned that AGW was more than 50% of any warming. That's 0.5% of papers. So let's see the claim 97% of climate papers agree. Just what do they agree on? That there is warming? That this warming is dangerous? That this warming has been shown OUTSIDE the models? "Self-limiting, Logarithmic: For the past several weeks, TWTW has been discussing the research on the greenhouse effect done by W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer (W & H) using the HITRAN database that began in the 1960s and is well established and tested. This database of both observations and calculations is used to predict and simulate the transmission and emission of electromagnetic radiation in the atmosphere. Using the calculations of W & H, Professor of Physics, emeritus, Howard Hayden extended their findings. The earth is cooled by outgoing infrared radiation, which has a longer wavelength than visible light. Greenhouse gases interfere with infrared radiation by absorbing and re-emitting photons at particularly wavelengths. Expressed simply, as the concentration of a specific greenhouse gas, CO2, increases, its effectiveness diminishes. In other words, as the amount of CO2 increases, its ability to further increase temperatures decreases. This is similar to an automobile approaching maximum speed. It will not go much faster no matter how hard the driver presses on the accelerator. In the highly influential 1979 Charney report, the committee attempted to get around this self-limiting characteristic by claiming, without physical evidence, that water vapor will greatly amplify the influence of CO2. But this amplification has not been found in over 40 years of atmospheric research. Thus, the Charney report is another example of one of the many dead-ends that scientists have speculated about greenhouse gases. There is nothing wrong with such speculation and errors, as long as scientists involved recognize them and correct the errors. As Richard Feynman explained in his famous lectures, scientific theory starts with a guess. The important step is testing that guess against all appropriate physical evidence. A common analogy is that greenhouse gases in the atmosphere act as a blanket protecting the earth from cooling too rapidly. Using that analogy, one can say that adding carbon dioxide to today’s atmosphere is like adding a handkerchief on top of a warm quilt. There is some effect, but it’s not noticeable." http://sepp.org/twtwfiles/2020/TWTW%2012-5-20.pdf The paper is - https://wvanwijngaarden.info.yorku.ca/files/2020/12/WThermal-Radiationf.pdf?x45936 "Summary: Cook et al. (2013) attempted to categorize 11,944 abstracts of papers (not entire papers) to their level of endorsement of AGW and found 7930 (66%) held no position on AGW. While only 65 papers (0.5%) explicitly endorsed and quantified AGW as +50% (Humans are the primary cause). Their methodology was so fatally flawed that they falsely classified skeptic papers as endorsing AGW, apparently believing to know more about the papers than their authors. Cook et al.’s author self-ratings simply confirmed the worthlessness of their methodology, as they were not representative of the sample since only 4% of the authors (1189 of 29,083) rated their own papers and of these, 63 % disagreed with their abstract ratings. [ Journal Coverage ] Energy Policy – Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: A re-analysis (PDF) (October 2014) Energy Policy – Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the literature: Rejoinder (PDF) (October 2014) Science & Education – Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change (PDF) (August 2013)" https://climatechangedispatch.com/97-articles-refuting-the-97-consensus/ I have only included journal articles. ;) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm lee wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:53pm:
So you have produced no scientific "peer reviewed" papers that support your belief that Global Warming is bullshit....You quote economists (with links to the White House "Trump") and sceptics who have no scientific qualifications....Provide scientific proof Global Warming is not happening not sceptic sites that ignore the facts....If there are actually any scientific papers that support your argument post them and stop wasting my time with climate sceptic bullshit....Your references are known climate change denial sites you dickhead!!! ::) ::) ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by aquascoot on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 5:08pm Mix_Master wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:41pm:
its a catastrophe and a disgrace |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Frank on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 5:54pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm:
MAN MADE global warming. You need to pin it on humans and you need to demonstrate that all the political responses are effective. 'Oh, energy is too expensive in the West, let's shift all manufacturing to China. We'll still have the 'knowledge economy"' except China steals all the knowledge and now makes everything AND claims oppressed third world status for carbon dioxide quotas. Western politicians sold out the West precisely because of people like you who keep them in power. You WANT them to lie to you for your vote. So they do. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 6:30pm Mortdooley wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 12:04am:
Even Fox threw this guy out eventually. For me his biggest highlight was when he was caught on a hot Mic telling Rupert that the idiots that follow him will believe anything. Quote:
The one thing that is certain is that Bill wouldn't know. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 6:37pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 6:30pm:
You got that right. ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 6:56pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm:
I don't need to petal. The null hypothesis is that it is natural until such time as it is proven otherwise. :o But thanks for showing your "scientific" credentials. ;D ;D ;D ;D philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm:
Which economists? Which skeptics with no scientific qualifications? W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer? "Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University, Canada, wlaser@yorku.ca2 Department of Physics, Princeton University, USA, happer@Princeton.edu" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm:
Read para one above. ;) Do you want to try again? philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 4:56pm:
Please show where any thinking person denies climate changes. The LIA - a change in climate. The MWP - a change in climate. The Holocene Optimum - a change in climate. Do you deny climate changes? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Climate changes. And all things being equal increasing CO2 will have a marginal effect. The problem is all things don't remain equal. "We use statistical methods for nonstationary time series to test the anthropogenic interpretation of global warming (AGW), according to which an increase in atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations raised global temperature in the 20th century. Specifically, the methodology of polynomial cointegration is used to test AGW since during the observation period (1880–2007) global temperature and solar irradiance are stationary in 1st differences whereas greenhouse gases and aerosol forcings are stationary in 2nd differences. We show that although these anthropogenic forcings share a common stochastic trend, this trend is empirically independent of the stochastic trend in temperature and solar irradiance. Therefore, greenhouse gas forcing, aerosols, solar irradiance and global temperature are not polynomially cointegrated. This implies that recent global warming is not statistically significantly related to anthropogenic forcing. On the other hand, we find that greenhouse gas forcing might have had a temporary effect on global temperature." http://www.earth-syst-dynam.net/3/173/2012/esd-3-173-2012.pdf |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:02pm
You are a dickhead Lee....There is enough scientific consensus and Government agreement where your bullshit scepticism doesn't hold water....The world is acting on global warming despite your bleating....You have no idea!!!
::) ::) ::) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/06/top-ten-global-warming-skeptic-arguments-debunked |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:07pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:02pm:
You now go to the garudian for evidence of AGW? Not peer reviewed journals? Oh dear. BTW - Cook et al 2013 was a "citizen science" project and not peer-reviewed. And quoting a hit piece by Dana (SKS contributor and part author of Cook's 97% shemozzle). ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Btw- "Climate models have accurately reproduced the past, but let's put them aside for a moment." That's because they are tuned to the past. They have no ability to predict anything. And what didn't you understand about science not being done by consensus. I also noticed you haven't rebutted what I wrote. Just a blanket statement. Why can't you do that? ::) |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:11pm lee wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:07pm:
Rebutted what....Do you really think you have proven Global Warming is a hoax....You are a complete waste of time you dickhead??? [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] [smiley=lolk.gif] |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:24pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:11pm:
Poor petal I will try to break it down into simple steps. You said "You quote economists (with links to the White House "Trump") and sceptics who have no scientific qualifications." I replied lee wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 6:56pm:
Refute that. A rebuttal showing what you alleged was said was in fact said. Talk about a time waster. You can't even back up what you say. ::) philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 7:11pm:
Poor petal. The truth finally emerges. I didn't say there was no Global Warming. That's just you making schist up. I am saying it is a noisy signal and we or may not have measurable AGW. Of course feel free to link to a paper that quantifies any AGW. Don't use CMIP5 or CMIP6 which runs hotter. They have many parameters. (parameters - where they insert numbers when they can't do data. "John von Neumann famously said With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk." "By this he meant that one should not be impressed when a complex model fits a data set well. With enough parameters, you can fit any data set." https://towardsdatascience.com/deep-learning-overfitting-846bf5b35e24 Finally the null hypothesis - "In response to Trenberth’s argument a second review, by Dr Judith Curry, focuses on the concept of a ‘null hypothesis’ the default position which is taken when research is carried out. Currently the null hypothesis for climate change attribution research is that humans have no influence." https://judithcurry.com/2011/11/03/climate-null-hypothesis/ Judith Curry is a lukewarmer. She thinks there is warming but it is not bad. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by philperth2010 on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:21pm
I surrender!!!
Quote:
:-X :-X :-X |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by lee on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:48pm philperth2010 wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 8:21pm:
Of course they can petal. One talks science and provides peer-reviewed references and the other references the garudian. The other references something called "climate change denial", but offers no proof. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Captain mortdooley on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 11:45pm Big Donger wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 10:45am:
Darkie, do you mean Susan Rice? That is so racist! Apparently you don't understand economics any better than biden. The consumer or end user always pays for the increases, these fat cats you want to pay their fair share just pass the taxes on. When prices go up, demand goes down. Demand goes down and tax revenue goes down. Less taxes collected, lower return for raising taxes. Trumps four years added seven trillion, obama added nine trillion while letting our military preparedness degrade. We saw what happened when Trump sent the budget back to congress, they either shut down the government and blamed him or he signed it and they blamed him for increasing the deficit. That was one of the reasons for part of the deficit. If other countries would pay their fair share we could spend less protecting you! Obama inherited a democrat created financial mess, when you loan billions of dollars to people who can't pay it back there are consequences. Democrat Presidents have always "kicked the can down the road" and left the incoming Republican Administration to catch up! All they care about is personal power and feeding their greed. The best way to do that is to continually grow government, bigger government means more power for them. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Ye Grappler on Feb 3rd, 2021 at 1:39am
The biggest mistake people here in Australia make is to think that Democrats = Labor and Republicans = LNP....
Each nation is distinct in its political separations...... |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 3rd, 2021 at 11:16am Mortdooley wrote on Feb 2nd, 2021 at 11:45pm:
No, dear. Obama added 8.75 trill to your government debt. Mr Trump added 8.53, prior to the covid stimulous, which gets added to next year's budget. On the military, Mr Trump continued the funding trajectory of Obama, which was largely bi-partisan. The Senate passed the funding 89 votes in favour to 8 against. It cost 700 billion, not 8.53 trill. Democrats supported a higher pay rise for troops, which was declined. You know that, everybody knows. Obama gave troops pay rises each budget. Fact check: https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/01/politics/trump-didnt-give-troops-first-raise/index.html Now stop pretending. Obama inherited a GFC from a Republican administration. His debt paid for economic stimulous. Trump's debt paid for corporate tax cuts, which amounted to your government borrowing money to fund a rise to Wall Street stock prices. Bush W did the same, after inheriting a surplus from Clinton. His debt funded two wars and a rise to health care stocks. Biden's left with a mess, which of course, you'll blame him for. You plan to blame next year's budget fallout on Biden. Oh yes, you'll say, but Obama was in before Trump, so it's his fault, or Biden's wasted money on stimulous. You watch, you'll try every trick in the book to pretend your Dear Leader, Mr Trump, was not the most ineffective and destructive prez you've ever had, hands down. But I'm curious. Why do you bother? What's in it for you? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Sprintcyclist on Feb 3rd, 2021 at 5:04pm Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 3rd, 2021 at 7:48pm Sprintcyclist wrote on Feb 3rd, 2021 at 5:04pm:
What's a foreign spokesperson, Sprint? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by J.D. on Feb 4th, 2021 at 8:57pm
Where is Biden now days, some are saying he died peacefully from old age in his sleep last night.
|
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Dnarever on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:13pm Johnnie wrote on Feb 4th, 2021 at 8:57pm:
Did you ever compare the video of Biden out on a bike ride with Trump trying to walk down a ramp or trying to drink water ? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by J.D. on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:25pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:13pm:
I would like to see Biden tee off on a golf course, he couldn't even get his pen back in his jacket the other day after signing his executive orders,, it took him 12 attempts before he threw the pen on the ground, he is a danger to mankind. |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:44pm Johnnie wrote on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:25pm:
Inferior penmanship. Dangerous, no? |
|
Title: Re: biden - less than a week in Post by Karnal on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:48pm Dnarever wrote on Feb 4th, 2021 at 9:13pm:
No, Dnarever, J.D forgot that one. But I'm sure you'll agree. It's not fair to expect Sleepy Joe to have his tie dry-cleaned. As Mr Trump famously said, they never come back the same, no? |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |