Is selected for The Supreme Court of the United States.

she seems a decent choice...

but I guess we know who will complain and complain and complain.

CHICAGO (AP) — Although Amy Coney Barrett is the president’s choice to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she is more aptly described as heir to another departed Supreme Court justice: conservative hero Antonin Scalia.

Like Scalia, for whom she once clerked, she is a committed Roman Catholic and a devotee of his favored interpretation of the Constitution known as originalism. Those qualifications delight many on the right but dismay liberals who fear her votes could result in the chipping away of some laws, especially the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion.




https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ruth-bader-ginsburg-chicago-us-supreme-court-courts-547b7de5b6ebabedee46b08b5bb37141

cods wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 6:13am:

she seems a decent choice... but I guess we know who will complain and complain and complain.

Decent?

In what way?

She belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that treats women like second class citizens.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 7:04am:

cods wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 6:13am: she seems a decent choice... but I guess we know who will complain and complain and complain. Decent? In what way? She belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that treats women like second class citizens.

I don't  think she's  a Muslim.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 7:09am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 7:04am: cods wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 6:13am: she seems a decent choice... but I guess we know who will complain and complain and complain. Decent? In what way? She belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that treats women like second class citizens. I don't  think she's  a Muslim.

She's a People of Praise cult member.

A cult that tortures women.

Makes sense why Trump supporters would like her.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ei5PhQQWkAE0HNs.jpg

She is a devout Roman Catholic.

https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c

Neferti wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:07am:

She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c

Yes.

She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:09am:

Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women.

I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;)

Neferti wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:13am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;)

The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church.

And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:17am:

Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:13am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;) The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists.

She's s Catholic.  Even the lapsed Catholics wouldn't call it a "cult".  ::)

Where does it say People of Praise?

Quote:

The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists.

You are an idiot!.........nothing new but it's good to remind members.....

This woman is a well respected Judge and she's a Roman Catholic.......
You on the other hand are a whining arsehole who is detested by most members here......

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:48am:

Quote: The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. You are an idiot!.........nothing new but it's good to remind members..... This woman is a well respected Judge and she's a Roman Catholic.......

She also belongs to an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens - People of Praise.

Undeniable fact.

Neferti wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:48am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:17am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:13am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;) The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. She's s Catholic.  Even the lapsed Catholics wouldn't call it a "cult".  ::) Where does it say People of Praise?

Please pay attention.

I'm not talking about the Catholic Church.

She is ALSO a member of an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens.

The cult is called 'People of Praise'.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:50am:

Fuzzball wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:48am: Quote: The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. You are an idiot!.........nothing new but it's good to remind members..... This woman is a well respected Judge and she's a Roman Catholic....... She also belongs to an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens - People of Praise. Undeniable fact.

Once again the Forum POS proves that he’s a POS...

I’m sure other forum POSs will come and jump on the bandwagon sometime soon and form a jerkcircle around you groggy 🥴 ..

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:53am:

Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:48am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:17am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:13am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;) The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. She's s Catholic.  Even the lapsed Catholics wouldn't call it a "cult".  ::) Where does it say People of Praise? Please pay attention. I'm not talking about the Catholic Church. She is ALSO a member of an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens. The cult is called 'People of Praise'.

Allegedly, no?
Always allegedly evil.

Frank wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:53am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:48am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:17am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:13am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;) The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. She's s Catholic.  Even the lapsed Catholics wouldn't call it a "cult".  ::) Where does it say People of Praise? Please pay attention. I'm not talking about the Catholic Church. She is ALSO a member of an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens. The cult is called 'People of Praise'. Allegedly, no? Always allegedly evil.

No, not allegedly.

She is a member of an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens.

People of Praise.

Neferti wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 7:04am:

CHICAGO (AP) — Although Amy Coney Barrett is the president’s choice to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she is more aptly described as heir to another departed Supreme Court justice: conservative hero Antonin Scalia. Like Scalia, for whom she once clerked, she is a committed Roman Catholic and a devotee of his favored interpretation of the Constitution known as originalism. Those qualifications delight many on the right but dismay liberals who fear her votes could result in the chipping away of some laws, especially the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-ruth-bader-ginsburg-chicago-us-supreme-court-courts-547b7de5b6ebabedee46b08b5bb37141

So...

Someone who interprets the constitution the way it is written...

GREAT!! ...

2 + 2 = 4...

UNLIKE the liberals... 2 + 2 = boys are girls and girls are boys...  :D :D :D

https://media.notthebee.com/articles/article-5f6a080388790.jpg

Groggy 🥴 ... when are you going to start attacking her black children and her child with special needs...

We all know you want to.. you just can’t help being a piece of Shiit...

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of.

“Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 8:53am:

Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:48am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:17am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:13am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:09am: Neferti wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 8:07am: She is a devout Roman Catholic. https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-ruth-bader-ginsburg-archive-courts-donald-trump-987e5fb6de8a1a29d1cbb00bf1f1948c Yes. She also belongs to an authoritarian religious cult that tortures women. I live in Australia so don't care who she is, what she does or where she goes to Church.  ;) The People of Praise cult doesn't have a church. And no matter where you live, you should be concerned that such an evil cult exists. She's s Catholic.  Even the lapsed Catholics wouldn't call it a "cult".  ::) Where does it say People of Praise? Please pay attention. I'm not talking about the Catholic Church. She is ALSO a member of an evil authoritarian cult that treats women like second class citizens. The cult is called 'People of Praise'.

Belonging to any Religious "Cult", or "Sect", or any Religion for that matter, would not preclude Judge Amy Coney Barrett from consideration to, or confirmation to a seat on the United States Supreme Court.

Matter in fact, the US Senate in it's questioning of Judge Barrett, by law can't even question her in regards to her religious affiliations. This is forbidden by the US Constitution itself, in the only clause that refers to any such "Test" of Religious affiliation.


Quote:

Article Six of the United States Constitution establishes the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it as the supreme law of the land, forbids a religious test as a requirement for holding a governmental position, and holds the United States under the Constitution responsible for debts incurred by the United States under the Articles of Confederation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Six_of_the_United_States_Constitution

#CONFIRM-ACB  :)

Beautiful People..  :)

---

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:05am:

As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization.

We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath.

We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group.

Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband.

She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark.

I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon.

I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left.

For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years.



Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member.

The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is a clause within Article VI, Clause 3.


Quote:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

It immediately follows a clause requiring all federal office holders to take an oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. This clause contains the only explicit reference to religion in the original seven articles of the U.S. Constitution.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member.

Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member.

I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown.

Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church.

There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated.

What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated.

Besides shes only been nominated.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated.

One time I had a miscarriage in 1984, and I had to have a D&C surgery.

After I returned from the hospital, I was forced to attend a People of Praise women’s meeting, or handmaidens’ meetings.

I had a head that was also woman, besides my husband.

They wanted to go shopping, and I couldn’t, due to returning from surgery and feeling weak.

I left the meeting to go home and rest, as my doctor had ordered.

I was met by my husband and forced into the car, kidnapped against my will, where I was driven to the cult leader’s home.

I was interrogated until wee hours of the morning and psychologically abused.

The next morning, the community was informed to shun me.

I would never allow anyone to treat me this way today, and it traumatizes me to admit this was my life at that time.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

No wonder Trump and his supporters like Barrett.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated.

Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;)

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:14am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated.

Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;)

Vangard wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:23am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;)

Thats ok, you can question on her views on abortion, womens rights etc.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:22am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. One time I had a miscarriage in 1984, and I had to have a D&C surgery. After I returned from the hospital, I was forced to attend a People of Praise women’s meeting, or handmaidens’ meetings. I had a head that was also woman, besides my husband. They wanted to go shopping, and I couldn’t, due to returning from surgery and feeling weak. I left the meeting to go home and rest, as my doctor had ordered. I was met by my husband and forced into the car, kidnapped against my will, where I was driven to the cult leader’s home. I was interrogated until wee hours of the morning and psychologically abused. The next morning, the community was informed to shun me. I would never allow anyone to treat me this way today, and it traumatizes me to admit this was my life at that time. https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png No wonder Trump and his supporters like Barrett.

"But basically, there was just cruelty and bullying, and it was not much difference than the Jim Jones cult.

"I shared with Heidi that my story is very much like The Handmaid’s Tale series and the Netflix series 10-part documentary The Keepers."

All making perfect sense now.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:24am:

Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) Thats ok, you can question on her views on abortion, womens rights etc.

Yes they can. She has previously answered, and will again, these same questions with the same answers she did when she was previously approved by the Senate, by a vote of 55-43, for her seat on the Appellate Court in 2017, where she said she would consider her opinions based on the Constitution as written.  ;)

Vangard wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:32am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:24am: Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) Thats ok, you can question on her views on abortion, womens rights etc. Yes they can. She has previously answered, and will again, these same questions with the same answers she did when she was previously approved by the Senate for her seat on the Appellate Court in 2017, where she said she would consider her opinions based on the Constitution as written.

Which means she supports Roe vs Wade?

Other things, yeah, there was always a list on my wall, a schedule, and men from the community would come unannounced to check on me to make sure I was on schedule and had done my chores.

There was basically no privacy.

And all of your personal — anything personal was given to your husband’s head also.

I wasn’t allowed contraceptives and was supposed to have all the children God intended for me, no matter what my health was.

I had had eight children and three miscarriages and D&C, often when my health was failing.

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:35am:

Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:32am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:24am: Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) Thats ok, you can question on her views on abortion, womens rights etc. Yes they can. She has previously answered, and will again, these same questions with the same answers she did when she was previously approved by the Senate for her seat on the Appellate Court in 2017, where she said she would consider her opinions based on the Constitution as written. Which means she supports Roe vs Wade?

As law she would support it, but I doubt she would agree with its findings, she is pro-life and openly says so

Vangard wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:39am:

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:35am: Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:32am: Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:24am: Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:14am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:12am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member. Even though I left the People of Praise cult, I didn’t have any rights, due to being married to my husband, who was a cult member. I was under the authority of my husband and his authoritarian head, Ed Brown. Under their authority, I was forced to attend meetings, but because I had defied leadership and their authority, I was forced to sit on the floor outside of their meetings in the hallway at the St. Mary’s Catholic Church. There’s dozens of witnesses that have seen how I was treated. What I would ask listeners to consider, even though they say this is a healthy group, to consider how I was treated and if this would be correct for Amy Barrett to be treated. Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) Thats ok, you can question on her views on abortion, womens rights etc. Yes they can. She has previously answered, and will again, these same questions with the same answers she did when she was previously approved by the Senate for her seat on the Appellate Court in 2017, where she said she would consider her opinions based on the Constitution as written. Which means she supports Roe vs Wade? As law she would support it, but I doubt she would agree with its findings, she is pro-life and openly says so

I'm guessing like a lot of Republicans, shes only pro-birth, once they're born they no longer give a crap

They really need to lay off this perceived need™ to promote a woman at all costs or risk being called out as 'misogynistic' etc...

When is this senseless stupidity going to end?

:'(
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:48am:

They really need to lay off this perceived need™ to promote a woman at all costs or risk being called out as 'misogynistic' etc... When is this senseless stupidity going to end?

About the same time SC nominations are done on the basis of best for the job, not political affiliation or thoughts

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:44am:

I'm guessing like a lot of Republicans, shes only pro-birth, once they're born they no longer give a crap

Bingo! 

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:44am:

I'm guessing like a lot of Republicans, shes only pro-birth, once they're born they no longer give a crap

Very astute.

In Raven's experience most "pro-lifers" are actually pro-birth. They don't give a f.uck about the child once they're born. They don't care about the quality of life, they aren't prepared to help the child. For them religious freedom simply means the freedom to impose their beliefs on others.

They are against abortion but are happy to sit back and allow the child to endure suffering no child should.

They wanted to cut funding to the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and other programs children rely on such as the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)

Frankly these issues are more important than Roe-v-Wade.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XtyrrtM7iME


Bit of an edit, but the original speech is pretty powerful.

Vangard wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:23am:

Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;)

If she was a muslim her religion wouldn't be an issue with the morally bankrupt hypocrite leftists.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 29^th, 2020 at 10:27am:

Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) If she was a muslim her religion wouldn't be an issue with the morally bankrupt hypocrite leftists.

Whereas on the other hand if she was a Muslim, she'd be accused of being anti-American, not Christian etc by the morally bankrupt hypocrite righties.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28^th, 2020 at 9:12am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:05am: As President Trump appears poised to announce a nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, we speak with a former member of the secretive Catholic group People of Praise, known for its rigid gender roles and lifelong loyalty oaths, which apparent front-runner Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a member of. “Many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult,” says Coral Anika Theill, who was a member of People of Praise from 1979 to 1984 and is now speaking out against the organization. We’re looking at Amy Barrett’s membership in a secretive Catholic group with rigid gender roles and a lifelong loyalty oath. We’re now joined by a former of People of Praise who’s now speaking out against the group. Coral Anika Theill was a People of Praise member for five years, from 1979 to 1984, after being forced to join the organization by her then-husband. She documented her experience in her memoir titled Bonsheá: Making Light of the Dark. I was a member of the People of Praise — many call it a community, but I describe it as a cult — in Corvallis, Oregon. I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left. For safety, I legally changed my name, and I’ve lived under a state address protection program from my ex-husband for the past 20 years. Makes sense why Trump supporters would support this cult member.

Name a single group of any kind, religious or otherwise, that doesn't have disillusioned, disgruntled or disappointed ex-members, turd. Go on, show what is noteworthy here. 
You cant parrot about gang rape in this case, as you did about Kavanagh, so you parrot this shite endlessly. You are full to the back teeth with crap.

On the People of Praise

Therefore, we covenant ourselves to live our lives together in Christ, our Lord, by the power of his spirit. We agree to be a basic Christian community, to find within our fellowship the essential core of our life in the spirit, in worship and the sacraments, spiritual and moral guidance, service, and apostolic activity. We accept the order of this community, which the Lord is establishing with all the ministry gifts of the Holy Spirit, especially with the foundational ministry gifts of apostles, pastors, prophets, teachers, and evangelists. We agree to obey the direction of the Holy Spirit manifested in and through these ministries in full harmony with the Church. We recognize in the covenant a unique relationship one to another and between the individual and the community. We accept the responsibility for mutual care, concern, and ministry among ourselves. We will serve one another and the community as a whole in all needs: spiritual, material, financial. We agree that the weekly meeting of the community is primary among our commitments and that we will not be absent except for a serious reason.[28]




Reception
Ralph Martin, president of Renewal Ministries, stated in the National Catholic Register that People of Praise is "part of the papally-approved mainstream of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which has been encouraged by every pope since Vatican II, none more strongly than Pope Francis."[1]

Coral Anika Theill was a member of the group in Oregon for five years during the 1970s and 1980s. In the wake of Amy Coney Barrett's 2020 nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, Theill spoke to a number of media outlets, including Reuters, about her experience with the group. Theill called People of Praise a "cult" and claimed that during her time in the group, women were expected to be completely obedient to men. Reuters could not independently verify her account. According to The Washington Post, Theill said her time in People of Praise "may have been atypical and extreme and that there may be regional differences."[18] A spokesperson for People of Praise denied Theill's allegations, saying "men and women share a fundamental equality as bearers of God's image" and "We value independent thinking."[2]

Anthropologist and scholar of comparative religion Thomas Csordas has written about People of Praise and stated, "I would definitely not use the term cult in its popular sense."[5] Csordas said "People of Praise is best described not as a cult but as a religiously-based 'intentional community.'"[2]




So, seething, deranged Lefty cockwombles, nuffin' to see here.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 29^th, 2020 at 10:27am:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

A Democratic Underground meme, turd.

Who they? Er...  "Democratic Underground is an online community for U.S. Democrats. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Underground
You are full of crap. To the brim.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 29^th, 2020 at 10:27am:

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

A Democratic Underground meme, turd.

Who they? Er...  "Democratic Underground is an online community for U.S. Democrats. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Underground
You are full of crap. To the brim.

The one thing we can absolutely count on is Trump picking the very worst person for every job he fills.

AiA wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 9:22am:

The one thing we can absolutely count on is Trump picking the very worst person for every job he fills.

And then blames someone else.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 9:35am:

AiA wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 9:22am: The one thing we can absolutely count on is Trump picking the very worst person for every job he fills. And then blames someone else.

And pretending he didn't know them

Frank wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 9:19am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 29th, 2020 at 10:27am: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png A Democratic Underground meme, turd. Who they? Er...  "Democratic Underground is an online community for U.S. Democrats. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Underground You are full of crap. To the brim.

She belongs to an authoritarian cult that abuses and tortures women.

That's just a fact.

Makes it more understandable why Trump and his supporters like her I suppose.

"I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left."

Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 9:38am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 9:35am: AiA wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 9:22am: The one thing we can absolutely count on is Trump picking the very worst person for every job he fills. And then blames someone else. And pretending he didn't know them

It's so pathetic how predictable his playbook is.

It starts out with Trump boasting that PersonX was handpicked for the job, they have tremendous skill and are the best of the best.

Then there is a fork in the road.

Firstly they do whatever is best for Trump, continue to get praise from him and anything negative said about them is fake news.

Or, they take their oath of office seriously and put their duty to the country before Trump.  If this happens, then we get the:

Trump says they're terrible at their job
Blames Obama
Says he doesn't know them or haven't spoken to them either recently or ever (despite being hand-picked by him)
Blames everything on them
Blames someone else, usually the Deep State for them being in the role
Calls them a loser, [insert insult here]
Fires them, taking credit for draining the swamp.

The more I think about it, the more it feels like they're not bad picks by Trump and he might in fact not be lying (much) when he says he doesn't have much to do with them or doesn't know them.

I get the impression that he doesn't care about any of the monotony of the job.  He just gets everyone, anyone else to do as much of the work so he doesn't have to, but he wants to take credit for it, without actually understanding what it is he's taking credit for.

So, anybody that needs to be hired for a role, he outsources that decision to someone else then swoops in and takes credit for it.

When he's blaming others for the pick it's because he didn't actually make it, someone else did.

When he says he doesn't know them, despite them being "handpicked", he doesn't actually know them because he didn't pick them.

Sure, we know he'll take responsibility for nothing, but I feel the issue with his hiring goes much deeper and is a greater problem.

He's not asleep at the wheel because he's not even at the wheel, he just sits there every now and then for the camera.

Or, he is just terrible at choosing people who are competent and the right person for the job and isn't a good judge of character, at least when it comes to people not willing to continually put Trump before country.

There are some patriots left in the Whitehouse, not many and they don't last long, but there have at least been some these past 4 years.

Coney Barrett is a done deal. The Dems should simply boycott the hearings and focus on the election. If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, none of this matters much.

AiA wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 10:19am:

Coney Barrett is a done deal. The Dems should simply boycott the hearings and focus on the election. If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, none of this matters much.

Well, it matters a lot actually.

If the Dems win the election, Trump won't concede.

He's made that very clear.

He'll take it to the - stacked - Supreme Court.

AiA wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 10:19am:

Coney Barrett is a done deal. The Dems should simply boycott the hearings and focus on the election. If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, none of this matters much.

SCOTUS will end up determining the election result if the people don't vote for Trump.

It matters.

But what can be done about it?

Even a huge win by Biden could still be put at risk by the stacked court.  I just hope, even if their conservative-leaning when it comes to issues like abortion etc that their still care enough about their duty, their oath and the constitution to do the right thing.

They've already got the seat for life, they don't need to keep Trump happy anymore.

One can hope...

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 10:28am:

AiA wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 10:19am: Coney Barrett is a done deal. The Dems should simply boycott the hearings and focus on the election. If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, none of this matters much. SCOTUS will end up determining the election result if the people don't vote for Trump. It matters. But what can be done about it? Even a huge win by Biden could still be put at risk by the stacked court.  I just hope, even if they're conservative-leaning when it comes to issues like abortion etc that their still care enough about their duty, their oath and the constitution to do the right thing. They've already got the seat for life, they don't need to keep Trump happy anymore. One can hope...

They don't care.

This will end badly for America.

greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 9:41am:

Frank wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 9:19am: greggerypeccary wrote on Sep 29th, 2020 at 10:27am: https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png A Democratic Underground meme, turd. Who they? Er...  "Democratic Underground is an online community for U.S. Democrats. Its membership is restricted by policy to those who are supportive of the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates for political office." https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Underground You are full of crap. To the brim. She belongs to an authoritarian cult that abuses and tortures women. That's just a fact. Makes it more understandable why Trump and his supporters like her I suppose. "I experienced abuse and torture by my husband, Marty Warner, Independence, Oregon, and the cult leaders, as well as shunning, shaming and a smear campaign against me when I escaped and left."

On the People of Praise

Therefore, we covenant ourselves to live our lives together in Christ, our Lord, by the power of his spirit. We agree to be a basic Christian community, to find within our fellowship the essential core of our life in the spirit, in worship and the sacraments, spiritual and moral guidance, service, and apostolic activity. We accept the order of this community, which the Lord is establishing with all the ministry gifts of the Holy Spirit, especially with the foundational ministry gifts of apostles, pastors, prophets, teachers, and evangelists. We agree to obey the direction of the Holy Spirit manifested in and through these ministries in full harmony with the Church. We recognize in the covenant a unique relationship one to another and between the individual and the community. We accept the responsibility for mutual care, concern, and ministry among ourselves. We will serve one another and the community as a whole in all needs: spiritual, material, financial. We agree that the weekly meeting of the community is primary among our commitments and that we will not be absent except for a serious reason.[28]




Reception
Ralph Martin, president of Renewal Ministries, stated in the National Catholic Register that People of Praise is "part of the papally-approved mainstream of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, which has been encouraged by every pope since Vatican II, none more strongly than Pope Francis."[1]

Coral Anika Theill was a member of the group in Oregon for five years during the 1970s and 1980s. In the wake of Amy Coney Barrett's 2020 nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, Theill spoke to a number of media outlets, including Reuters, about her experience with the group. Theill called People of Praise a "cult" and claimed that during her time in the group, women were expected to be completely obedient to men. Reuters could not independently verify her account. According to The Washington Post, Theill said her time in People of Praise "may have been atypical and extreme and that there may be regional differences."[18] A spokesperson for People of Praise denied Theill's allegations, saying "men and women share a fundamental equality as bearers of God's image" and "We value independent thinking."[2]

Anthropologist and scholar of comparative religion Thomas Csordas has written about People of Praise and stated, "I would definitely not use the term cult in its popular sense."[5] Csordas said "People of Praise is best described not as a cult but as a religiously-based 'intentional community.'"[2]




So, seething, deranged Lefty cockwombles, nuffin' to see here.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YJ5hurnjrQM/X2lI64ZJFzI/AAAAAAAAuEo/ql9KIDiNc_wi-OSrZj9asLVzsW_MITmLACLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/Screen%2BShot%2B2020-09-21%2Bat%2B5.34.45%2BPM.png

Baronvonrort wrote on Sep 29^th, 2020 at 10:27am:

Vangard wrote on Sep 28th, 2020 at 9:23am: Unfortunately for you, & all your fellow Trump Haters, who wish to see her confirmation sidetracked, the confirmation of the President's Constitutional choice of Justice of the US Supreme Court, by law no member of the US Senate will be permitted to question Judge Barrett regarding any Religious affiliations. ;) If she was a muslim her religion wouldn't be an issue with the morally bankrupt hypocrite leftists.

If she was a Muslim she wouldn't be nominated. And if she was she wouldn't make it past the confirmation hearing.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Sep 30^th, 2020 at 10:28am:

AiA wrote on Sep 30th, 2020 at 10:19am: Coney Barrett is a done deal. The Dems should simply boycott the hearings and focus on the election. If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, none of this matters much. SCOTUS will end up determining the election result if the people don't vote for Trump. It matters. But what can be done about it? Even a huge win by Biden could still be put at risk by the stacked court.  I just hope, even if their conservative-leaning when it comes to issues like abortion etc that their still care enough about their duty, their oath and the constitution to do the right thing. They've already got the seat for life, they don't need to keep Trump happy anymore. One can hope...

If the Dems go after her Kavanaugh-style they will only make themselves look bad prior to the election. They can either boycott the hearings en masse and keep silent, or they can go in and ask her question pertaining to laws broken during the Trump Administration, the Emoluments Clause, for example.

Trump Demands Investigation Into Whoever Nominated Amy Coney Barrett

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following several days of controversy swirling among his supporters over a string of surprising U.S. Supreme Court opinions, President Donald Trump demanded an investigation into who nominated Amy Coney Barrett.

According to Trump, the American people deserve to know what kind of person would nominate a justice who keeps siding with liberal judges and against the Constitution.

"Effective today, I am ordering a full investigation into who was responsible for nominating such an unreliable justice," Trump told reporters. "Amy Coney Barrett has been a big disappointment. Very sad. Very tragic, what she's done. We have to find out who did it. I would have nominated someone much better, believe me. We'll use the full force of the federal government to find out who put her in this position, and we will hold that person accountable. We've got to do it. Maybe it was Joe. We'll see."

White House sources said that the president was advised against launching the investigation, but he was determined to get to the bottom of it.

"We can't let people nominate bad Supreme Court justices," Trump explained. "Once we find out who is responsible for making such a bonehead choice, I'll deal with them myself. They're not going to want to deal with me. I just want to ask them what they were thinking. They really could've done a better job. It's sad."

At publishing time, Trump had also ordered an investigation into who decided to plunge North America into a trade war by threatening to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico.

Frank wrote on Mar 11^th, 2025 at 7:45am:

Trump Demands Investigation Into Whoever Nominated Amy Coney Barrett WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following several days of controversy swirling among his supporters over a string of surprising U.S. Supreme Court opinions, President Donald Trump demanded an investigation into who nominated Amy Coney Barrett. According to Trump, the American people deserve to know what kind of person would nominate a justice who keeps siding with liberal judges and against the Constitution. "Effective today, I am ordering a full investigation into who was responsible for nominating such an unreliable justice," Trump told reporters. "Amy Coney Barrett has been a big disappointment. Very sad. Very tragic, what she's done. We have to find out who did it. I would have nominated someone much better, believe me. We'll use the full force of the federal government to find out who put her in this position, and we will hold that person accountable. We've got to do it. Maybe it was Joe. We'll see." White House sources said that the president was advised against launching the investigation, but he was determined to get to the bottom of it. "We can't let people nominate bad Supreme Court justices," Trump explained. "Once we find out who is responsible for making such a bonehead choice, I'll deal with them myself. They're not going to want to deal with me. I just want to ask them what they were thinking. They really could've done a better job. It's sad." At publishing time, Trump had also ordered an investigation into who decided to plunge North America into a trade war by threatening to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico.

I believe it Fwank....Trump really is that stupid....He could even be dumber than you if that is possible???

:-? :-? :-?

philperth2010 wrote on Mar 11^th, 2025 at 8:30am:

Frank wrote on Mar 11th, 2025 at 7:45am: Trump Demands Investigation Into Whoever Nominated Amy Coney Barrett WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following several days of controversy swirling among his supporters over a string of surprising U.S. Supreme Court opinions, President Donald Trump demanded an investigation into who nominated Amy Coney Barrett. According to Trump, the American people deserve to know what kind of person would nominate a justice who keeps siding with liberal judges and against the Constitution. "Effective today, I am ordering a full investigation into who was responsible for nominating such an unreliable justice," Trump told reporters. "Amy Coney Barrett has been a big disappointment. Very sad. Very tragic, what she's done. We have to find out who did it. I would have nominated someone much better, believe me. We'll use the full force of the federal government to find out who put her in this position, and we will hold that person accountable. We've got to do it. Maybe it was Joe. We'll see." White House sources said that the president was advised against launching the investigation, but he was determined to get to the bottom of it. "We can't let people nominate bad Supreme Court justices," Trump explained. "Once we find out who is responsible for making such a bonehead choice, I'll deal with them myself. They're not going to want to deal with me. I just want to ask them what they were thinking. They really could've done a better job. It's sad." At publishing time, Trump had also ordered an investigation into who decided to plunge North America into a trade war by threatening to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico. I believe it Fwank....Trump really is that stupid....He could even be dumber than you if that is possible??? :-? :-? :-?

Na - But Almost.

Frank wrote on Mar 11^th, 2025 at 7:45am:

Trump Demands Investigation Into Whoever Nominated Amy Coney Barrett WASHINGTON, D.C. — Following several days of controversy swirling among his supporters over a string of surprising U.S. Supreme Court opinions, President Donald Trump demanded an investigation into who nominated Amy Coney Barrett. According to Trump, the American people deserve to know what kind of person would nominate a justice who keeps siding with liberal judges and against the Constitution. "Effective today, I am ordering a full investigation into who was responsible for nominating such an unreliable justice," Trump told reporters. "Amy Coney Barrett has been a big disappointment. Very sad. Very tragic, what she's done. We have to find out who did it. I would have nominated someone much better, believe me. We'll use the full force of the federal government to find out who put her in this position, and we will hold that person accountable. We've got to do it. Maybe it was Joe. We'll see." White House sources said that the president was advised against launching the investigation, but he was determined to get to the bottom of it. "We can't let people nominate bad Supreme Court justices," Trump explained. "Once we find out who is responsible for making such a bonehead choice, I'll deal with them myself. They're not going to want to deal with me. I just want to ask them what they were thinking. They really could've done a better job. It's sad." At publishing time, Trump had also ordered an investigation into who decided to plunge North America into a trade war by threatening to impose tariffs on Canada and Mexico.

Honest religious nutters will only go so far, they tend to around 50% not be openly corrupt and dishonest. ACB will go as far as she can but will tend to not openly breach the law or the constitution most of the time.