Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 9:28am:

The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone

Well, if it's "to get rid of someone", surely that's OK, right?

It a bit like how OJ did a tiny bit of throat cutting to get rid of somebody.

If you are good at what you do, you don't have to do much.

So doxxing is ok then? :-?

depends if your names monk! ;D ;D

he always has the perfect excuse .... :D :D

Gordon wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 9:32am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:28am: The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone

What would Monk consider a lot of doxxing?

AiA wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 11:41am:

Gordon wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:32am: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:28am: The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone What would Monk consider a lot of doxxing?

Anything he himself did not do.

Oh, stuff like Naffy doxxed, every nook and cranny of Aussie’s life and even his family. But that must be OK, the doxxer is back here.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 11:49am:

Oh, stuff like Naffy doxxed, every nook and cranny of Aussie’s life and even his family. But that must be OK, the doxxer is back here.

Yes, yes he is. Welcome back Monk!

So we have here a self-admitting Doxxer who also accuses another member back here, of being a Doxxer and a worser one. Real playground stuff here.

Setanta wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 11:46am:

AiA wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 11:41am: Gordon wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:32am: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:28am: The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone What would Monk consider a lot of doxxing? Anything he himself did not do.

I think you are onto something ...

Gordon wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 9:32am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:28am: The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone

Monk is a hypocrite

So why is this person Monk, being a Doxxer and accusing others of being Doxxers, in an effort to make 'him' seem ok in doing it. Allowed to still be on this Forum, besides hold a Modship for a Board (upon a parade of self-confessed lies and denying of those very lies after)??

Has there been a precedence like this?
Is this the first time this has happened on OzPolitics?
A case of Stealing Seats in the Senate?

Stripped of his Modship.
Banned from the Forum until New Year's Day.
But if Monk's 50 posts of nothing really much to say, makes FreeDiver his $250 a month, while the rest of us can make just 10 posts say a lot. Well, he's entitled to it. He can even put a fence (like Trump's Wall) around it and ban us from climbing it to the top. Monk wants FD to retire and sell the Forum to him. So be it. Monk to pay $100,000 for OzPolitic. Well done Monk. You saved us all!

Is Monk saying that his doxxing, his not only posting a member's name and employer but actually calling another member's employer is somehow not a serious matter?

I know of no one else who has done such a thing.

Does anyone?

AiA wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:01pm:

Is Monk saying that his doxxing, his not only posting a member's name and employer but actually calling another member's employer is somehow not a serious matter? I know of no one else who has done such a thing. Does anyone?

Not me but it was of course a thing that needed to be done. One should not dismiss the need involved. Why else would he do it? The world would have ended if he didn't. That you are still here and able to post is proof of that. You should thank the Inari that he did what he did and offer rice balls in his honour. He needs them, he has no balls of his own.

Setanta wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:21pm:

AiA wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:01pm: Is Monk saying that his doxxing, his not only posting a member's name and employer but actually calling another member's employer is somehow not a serious matter? I know of no one else who has done such a thing. Does anyone? Not me but it was of course a thing that needed to be done. One should not dismiss the need involved. Why else would he do it? The world would have ended if he didn't. That you are still here and able to post is proof of that. You should thank the Inari that he did what he did and offer rice balls in his honour. He needs them, he has no balls of his own.

That is a fair point, Set. Monk's serial doxxing needed to be done. It was for the victims' own good. Tough love, it was.

I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs
and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs.

Monk is having another episode right now.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:35pm:

I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs. Monk is having another episode right now.

He does seem to have a thing about PMing members. For votes, ego but most of all for internecine warfare. I suspect the last part is Aussie's influence.

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:35pm:

I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs. Monk is having another episode right now.

Monk was exposed a few years back (remember the PMs he is always bleating about me releasing?) for mixing booze and pain killers. It is a nasty combination, Bobby.

Setanta wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:35pm: I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs. Monk is having another episode right now. He does seem to have a thing about PMing members. For votes, ego but most of all for internecine warfare. I suspect the last part is Aussie's influence.

Monk is no longer his own man, Set.

Setanta wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:45pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:35pm: I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs. Monk is having another episode right now. He does seem to have a thing about PMing members. For votes, ego but most of all for internecine warfare. I suspect the last part is Aussie's influence.

Aussie and Monk feed off each other.

Yes, you DID publish in open 15 PRIVATE messages sent to you, didn’t you AiA? Remember Annie, very sick very weak but you STILL posted those PMs of her, right? You are a real frontbottom and hypocrite.

When IQ posted that photo of me with the caption that it was the photo of of pedophile you banned IQ for two weeks, right? But IQ was soon back using several sock accounts.

You are pretty relaxed with doxxing, aren’t you AiA, as long as it is not you who is doxxed?

AiA wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:58pm:

Bobby. wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:35pm: I warned Monk tonight to stop spamming my PMs and he didn't listen so I have blocked his PMs. Monk is having another episode right now. Monk was exposed a few years back (remember the PMs he is always bleating about me releasing?) for mixing booze and pain killers. It is a nasty combination, Bobby.

Maybe he needs a straight jacket and a padded cell?


http://sj.blacksteel.com/media/images/gb01.jpg

What Bobby did was not a tiny bit of doxxing, was it? Gutless wonder!

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 11:02pm:

Yes, you DID publish in open 15 PRIVATE messages sent to you, didn’t you AiA? Remember Annie, very sick very weak but you STILL posted those PMs of her, right? You are a real frontbottom and hypocrite. When IQ posted that photo of me with the caption that it was the photo of of pedophile you banned IQ for two weeks, right? But IQ was soon back using several sock accounts. You are pretty relaxed with doxxing, aren’t you AiA, as long as it is not you who is doxxed?

Yes, those PMs not only revealed your addiction problems but also the extent to which you and Aussie were plotting to shut down the real PA.

Am I relaxed with doxxing? Well,  you got a couple of weeks suspension for posting DT's real name and employer. As for IQ, maybe he got the same. I really don't recall the details, but you got no more than he got, and he got no more than you got. But you crossed the line by not only revealing an employer but actually contacting one.

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 11:13pm:

What Bobby did was not a tiny bit of doxxing, was it? Gutless wonder!

There is a definition of doxxing. It's not whatever you want it to be.

Gutless wonder? What do you call someone that claims they were threatened and not told of the consequences of their actions even when it's pointed out in glaring clarity and the evidence shows otherwise?

Setanta wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 12:08pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 11:49am: Oh, stuff like Naffy doxxed, every nook and cranny of Aussie’s life and even his family. But that must be OK, the doxxer is back here. Yes, yes he is. Welcome back Monk!

'Welcome back Monk'? What sort of drugs are you on today?

John Smith wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 5:28pm:

Setanta wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 12:08pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 11:49am: Oh, stuff like Naffy doxxed, every nook and cranny of Aussie’s life and even his family. But that must be OK, the doxxer is back here. Yes, yes he is. Welcome back Monk! 'Welcome back Monk'? What sort of drugs are you on today?

https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/2297149055.gif

Monk is a good example of when people grow old, some of them turn into old 'Codgers'.

https://image.shutterstock.com/image-vector/old-man-on-white-background-260nw-258066449.jpg

AiA wrote on Aug 9^th, 2020 at 7:43am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 11:02pm: Yes, you DID publish in open 15 PRIVATE messages sent to you, didn’t you AiA? Remember Annie, very sick very weak but you STILL posted those PMs of her, right? You are a real frontbottom and hypocrite. When IQ posted that photo of me with the caption that it was the photo of of pedophile you banned IQ for two weeks, right? But IQ was soon back using several sock accounts. You are pretty relaxed with doxxing, aren’t you AiA, as long as it is not you who is doxxed? Yes, those PMs not only revealed your addiction problems but also the extent to which you and Aussie were plotting to shut down the real PA. Am I relaxed with doxxing? Well,  you got a couple of weeks suspension for posting DT's real name and employer. As for IQ, maybe he got the same. I really don't recall the details, but you got no more than he got, and he got no more than you got. But you crossed the line by not only revealing an employer but actually contacting one.

Hi AiA,
Employer contact?
You do know that Monk denies that?

Arsie rang a PA Member at his work!  That Member was not well pleased and posted so on PA. Arsie doxxed the guy to find out where he worked. AiA (and others) remember the incident, I am sure.

I have been threatened by Arsie (today, again) and I am not well pleased.  Bugger off, you twerp. >:(

Neferti wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 8:25pm:

Arsie rang a PA Member at his work!  That Member was not well pleased and posted so on PA. Arsie doxxed the guy to find out where he worked. AiA (and others) remember the incident, I am sure. I have been threatened by Arsie (today, again) and I am not well pleased.  Bugger off, you twerp. >:(

If that was the case I'd say you should inform FD. If not, you should not accuse people of shyte without evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rH8hcfhG1Jo

I am aware of it. It was a long time ago. Aussie is one of the worst doxxers around, and has a very long history of it. I think I've done a good job of training him, but he still has the occasional relapse.

Neferti wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 8:25pm:

Arsie rang a PA Member at his work!  That Member was not well pleased and posted so on PA. Arsie doxxed the guy to find out where he worked. AiA (and others) remember the incident, I am sure. I have been threatened by Arsie (today, again) and I am not well pleased.  Bugger off, you twerp. >:(

Did he threaten to "deck" you Nef  ;D

freediver wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 9:43pm:

I am aware of it. It was a long time ago. Aussie is one of the worst doxxers around, and has a very long history of it. I think I've done a good job of training him, but he still has the occasional relapse.

Hi FD,
would you care to comment as to whether both
Aussie and Monk have contacted the employers
of people who have posted online?
They both strenuously deny that but it's
something that keeps popping up so often,
that we all wonder if there's some truth behind it?

As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk.

freediver wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 10:01pm:

As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk.

I can assure you that they both strenuously deny it.

Setanta wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 9:03pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 8:25pm: Arsie rang a PA Member at his work!  That Member was not well pleased and posted so on PA. Arsie doxxed the guy to find out where he worked. AiA (and others) remember the incident, I am sure. I have been threatened by Arsie (today, again) and I am not well pleased.  Bugger off, you twerp. >:( If that was the case I'd say you should inform FD. If not, you should not accuse people of shyte without evidence.

What would you call this?

---

...

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 5:51am:

...

Aussie and Monk are threatening other posters.
I am threatened for just posing a question
and banned for 6 months from Monk's lousy forum
for asking such a question.
I only post there once every 6 months or so and it
only ever leads to massive abuse of me so
it's better that I stay away.

freediver wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 10:01pm:

As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk.

Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer.

freediver wrote on Oct 18^th, 2020 at 9:43pm:

I am aware of it. It was a long time ago. Aussie is one of the worst doxxers around, and has a very long history of it. I think I've done a good job of training him, but he still has the occasional relapse.

That is also incorrect.  Please provide proof of your claim that I have a very long history of doxxing.

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:00am:

freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer.

True. Only Monk has sunk so low.

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:00am:

freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer.

You just rang the PA Member at his place of work. How did you know where the person worked and what his real name was?

It is recorded at PA somewhere, I have seen the post, as has everybody else. The Member was not well pleased, at all and said so.

Your memory is beginning to fail, Mr Magoo.

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:14am:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. You just rang the PA Member at his place of work. How did you know where the person worked and what his real name was? It is recorded at PA somewhere, I have seen the post, as has everybody else. The Member was not well pleased, at all and said so. Your memory is beginning to fail, Mr Magoo.

I detest having to exchange with you, given your conduct, but you go too far, yet again. 

Together with several other Members of PA, and at his request, I met with that Member socially in Brisbane.  He was quite open about his identity, the work he does and what he was doing in Brisbane.

He and a friend of his owned the server which hosted PA.  When we moved to be hosted by FD, we lost all the old records of PA and Members were unhappy about that.  AiA suggested I contact that Member to see if he had kept a copy of the Forum.  I was reluctant to do so, however I did, against my better judgement having been persuaded to do so for the benefit of the whole Membership of PA.  I made that contact for the Membership, not for personal reasons.  They are the basic facts, so do not make a mountain out of a mole hill.

I trust I never have to engage with you again.  I wish other Forum Members also did not engage with you.  That is the least of what you deserve.

do yourself a favor nef....have nothing to do with either of them..selective memory and lying is all you will ever get......it works for me.

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:14am:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. You just rang the PA Member at his place of work. How did you know where the person worked and what his real name was? It is recorded at PA somewhere, I have seen the post, as has everybody else. The Member was not well pleased, at all and said so. Your memory is beginning to fail, Mr Magoo.

Scary stuff.

https://www.abc.net.au/austory/to-catch-a-stalker:-part-1/12745162

Observe the last paragraph on this screenshot.  Is that a threat? I consider that it is.

---

Aussie and Monk sure do dig themselves some big holes.

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 8:16am:

Observe the last paragraph on this screenshot.  Is that a threat? I consider that it is.

That is a threat, Nef. Aussie is a dangerous man.

AiA wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 9:31am:

Neferti wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 8:16am: Observe the last paragraph on this screenshot.  Is that a threat? I consider that it is. That is a threat, Nef. Aussie is a dangerous man.

I have reported it!

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 9:51am:

AiA wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 9:31am: Neferti wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 8:16am: Observe the last paragraph on this screenshot.  Is that a threat? I consider that it is. That is a threat, Nef. Aussie is a dangerous man. I have reported it!

some people think they are above the law...

what the hell has nef done now???...

all she has done is try to check  his statements...claiming he has done nothing wrong....

maybe he wants that tested in court who the hell knows..

we know he threatened others with action  over and over again......


as far as I know nef has never threatened him...she has never posted personal tidbits about him again either....

she has been punished  and I think most on here agreed with that...... as I am sure aussie knows prisoners get time off for good behavior...so yes she should be allowed back on this forum..

that nef is what this is all about   your return.....

he is so vindictive he will stoop to any level....and attack anyone ...sadly its what mongs do.

Ignore Aussie's vailed threats.

It's all bluster and B.S. (and trolling)

https://s3.amazonaws.com/lowres.jantoo.com/law-policing-attorney-solicitor-truth-lie-lawyer-29605787_low.jpg

I have deleted crap and will respnd to this:


Quote:

some people think they are above the law...

Indeed they do, and I am not one of them.  I know the Law, your special pal does not.  She needs to learn.


Quote:

all she has done is try to check  his statements...claiming he has done nothing wrong....

No. Show me one post of mine where I say I have done nothing wrong.


Quote:

we know he threatened others with action  over and over again......

There you go again with the 'we.'  Karen, you are not part of a 'we.'

Name even one person I have threatened and specify the threat.  I'll bet you can't.


Quote:

that nef is what this is all about   your return.....

Correct.  The ultimate sin anyone can commit on a Forum like this is to do what that doxxer did.  She went well out of her way, specifically dedicated time and effort, to ferret out details from the meagre pickings I posted about my life.  She hit pay dirt getting my name from my High School web site.  She then searched FaceBook and found me and the list of my friends including my Grand Daughter.  She then searched some obscure data base of matters in QCAT and totally misrepresented the facts of one case I was involved in there. There is much more, but I'll leave it at that.  She then spread those details at the sewer and that is why Super Nova and AiA had their fun with a Thread about shaving.....which I have archived.  She then posted what she found here.  Not only my details, but those of my Wife and my Grand Daughter.  She could have had a private chuckle, but instead, she wanted to dox, go public and get pats on the head, reward for her effort and posted it all here.  That is the ultimate sin.  (After her initial three month ban for it...she came back and doubled down...got a long ban...and, yes, I am saying that should have been permanent.)

That sort of low life has no place anywhere near social media platforms.  That sort of low life has no idea what legal stalking is.  That sort of low life needs to learn. 

Super Nova wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 5:18pm:

Ignore Aussie's vailed threats. It's all bluster and B.S. (and trolling) https://s3.amazonaws.com/lowres.jantoo.com/law-policing-attorney-solicitor-truth-lie-lawyer-29605787_low.jpg

I do sn   but when he threatens it isnt nice so why should it be ignored???.....I am with nef here... the mongs object to her being here... no one else does...

as i see it is they have other places they can whinge and whine  in .. shes here and shes staying....hes just dribbled all over my post   and he will wait till hell freezes before I will answer his dribble...

hes a big baby a whiner from way back...



Quote:

Jovial Monk wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 9:28am: The tiny bit of doxxing I did to get rid of someone

now theres an eyeopener of a confession......I am sure he will claim he never said such a thing in threads to come......did aussie report that do you think???? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Aussie,

So it is OK for you to use information provided by a poster to call them at work because it is Ok for you to use scattered information to track someone down, it is OK because you thought it was for a higher purpose. I remember how upset said person was.

So it is OK for Monk to track someone down to their workplace using IPs to try and get them sacked. No care for the livelihood of that family.

So it is OK for Monk to use IPs to find out where I worked, so I know this to be true, even though I viewed his site as a guest and never posted. i know exactly how he did and what he was up to.

So it is OK for Monk to chase DT in real life such that he closed down his site and was never seen around these parts again.

So it is OK for you to write down IP address and personal details when they come up to be used later. (and while admin of  site FFS)

So it is OK for you to post personal information all over the place and for you to be surprised that someone would put it together to work out who you are.

So it is OK that you spend years big noting yourself only for that self made image to be destroyed when the truth about you is revealed.

I would be pissed off too aussie, to be exposed for the asrehole you are and have been through your entire career. Infamy uncovered.

So the lesson here aussie is; if you want to remain anonymous, don't tell us about you and your life that includes personal identifying information.

You made the mistake, you are to blame. Live with us all knowing who you really are and the fact we know what a horrible human being you really are.

Aussie, I cry tears for your stupidity.

You win the forum Darwin Award.

http://img.memecdn.com/darwin-award-is-waiting-for-the-best-one_o_2594197.jpg

Bloody hell Aussie, are you threatening legal action against a member here? Taking things a bit far eh? I thought aside of all the argy-bargy we were all good friends.

dont know about you sn..

but I dont even want to know about his history or his doxxing 

if he didnt talk about it it would go away.....

I think he likes the attention......he should think himself lucky someone was that interested in him.... ;D ;D ;D ;D


what was she thinking???... :D :D :D :D sorry nef.

Gordon wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:15pm:

Bloody hell Aussie, are you threatening legal action against a member here? Taking things a bit far eh? I thought aside of all the argy-bargy we were all goos friends.

dunno what a goos friend is gordy..

but count me out of that group please... :-/

cods wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:17pm:

Gordon wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:15pm: Bloody hell Aussie, are you threatening legal action against a member here? Taking things a bit far eh? I thought aside of all the argy-bargy we were all goos friends. dunno what a goos friend is gordy.. but count me out of that group please... :-/

Come on Cods, Aussie would be a top bloke in real life.

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:00am:

freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer.

Did you contact one at work?

Super Nova wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 5:53pm:

Aussie, So it is OK for you to use information provided by a poster to call them at work because it is Ok for you to use scattered information to track someone down, it is OK because you thought it was for a higher purpose. I remember how upset said person was.

Indeed he was upset.  And yes, I contacted him against my better judgement after being urged to do so by AiA and others.  The 'purpose' was beneficial to PA but I knew there was an invasion of his privacy.  That was a judgement call and the outcome could have been what we have (nothing) and the old PA archives being restored, which would have been fantastic.  Do you not agree?


Quote:

So it is OK for Monk to track someone down to their workplace using IPs to try and get them sacked. No care for the livelihood of that family.

There is zero evidence that occurred but if it did...no, it is not okay.


Quote:

So it is OK for Monk to use IPs to find out where I worked, so I know this to be true, even though I viewed his site as a guest and never posted. i know exactly how he did and what he was up to.

That is all Martian to me.  No way can anyone be tracked via an IP.....you said so yourself.  If Monk knows where you worked, he never made it public to my knowledge.


Quote:

So it is OK for Monk to chase DT in real life such that he closed down his site and was never seen around these parts again.

That is not true.  DT was wanting to get out of his site.  He offered to sell it to me.  I was not buying at his absurd price.


Quote:

So it is OK for you to write down IP address and personal details when they come up to be used later. (and while admin of  site FFS)

Back then.....how many years ago.......there was no automatic capacity to check users for puppet attack dogs.  When Shrink appointed me as a Mod, yes, I manually wrote down IPs to suss out the socks...doing that exposed many arseholes who attacked Members with socks, including you, and..surprise surprise, the always innocent Animal Mother.  I recall you then telling me that my IP cross cross chec was vulnerable to mistakes.  Remember?


Quote:

So it is OK for you to post personal information all over the place and for you to be surprised that someone would put it together to work out who you are.

You have posted personal information all over the place, including specifically where we could meet.  If I could be arsed, it would take me a nano-second to nail you.  (a)  I can't be arsed, and (b) if I was, no way would I publish the results in private or in open.


Quote:

So it is OK that you spend years big noting yourself only for that self made image to be destroyed when the truth about you is revealed.

Big noting?  Well I have a life and I don't mind sharing some broad details.  I guess you have done nothing worth talking about.  No surprise there.  No negative truth about me has ever been revealed....yes, half truths have but they never include the ultimate outcomes that the doxxer never discovered.  That is the clue.  Goodness knows, I don't know how many times I have said here that if you check the Roll, you will find my name still there.  There was the only hint I ever gave or will ever give.


Quote:

I would be pissed off too aussie, to be exposed for the asrehole you are and have been through your entire career. Infamy uncovered.

See above.


Quote:

So the lesson here aussie is; if you want to remain anonymous, don't tell us about you and your life that includes personal identifying information.

Want me to test you on that? 


Quote:

You made the mistake, you are to blame. Live with us all knowing who you really are and the fact we know what a horrible human being you really are.

Forget the hyperbole crap SN.  I did not post your personal details here, and if you want me to, just say so.  I will go to the trouble, go way out of my way, spend what is is my pocket change, find out who you are, and post the details.  Okay by you?

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:26pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. Did you contact one at work?

Yes, and I have explained the circumstances.  Tell us about that car bonnet thing you turned the disc with the PA records, into.  Why did you do that?

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:30pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:26pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. Did you contact one at work? Yes, and I have explained the circumstances.  Tell us about that car bonnet thing you turned the disc with the PA records, into.  Why did you do that?

It's called a hood ornament Aussie. I did it because I am very artistic like that.

Was this person happy for you to contact them at work?

Gordon wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:22pm:

cods wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:17pm: Gordon wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:15pm: Bloody hell Aussie, are you threatening legal action against a member here? Taking things a bit far eh? I thought aside of all the argy-bargy we were all goos friends. dunno what a goos friend is gordy.. but count me out of that group please... :-/ Come on Cods, Aussie would be a top bloke in real life.

no Idont think so....I think what we see here is what you get.....he hasnt changed in all the years this has been going and he talks endlessly about other forums he has been on...most of which have now disappeared.... so he is safe giving his version of events....I would love to hear deepthoughts version of events..... I never met him I dont go back that far...

but anyone who would attempt to get in touch with  a person in their work place.....tells me they are a desperate person...with no ethics  none whatever

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:37pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:30pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:26pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. Did you contact one at work? Yes, and I have explained the circumstances.  Tell us about that car bonnet thing you turned the disc with the PA records, into.  Why did you do that? It's called a hood ornament Aussie. I did it because I am very artistic like that. Was this person happy for you to contact them at work?

fd dont you get it.. he has told you it was AiAs fault not his,,, ;D ;D ;D ;D

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 5:50am:

Setanta wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 9:03pm: Neferti wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 8:25pm: Arsie rang a PA Member at his work!  That Member was not well pleased and posted so on PA. Arsie doxxed the guy to find out where he worked. AiA (and others) remember the incident, I am sure. I have been threatened by Arsie (today, again) and I am not well pleased.  Bugger off, you twerp. >:( If that was the case I'd say you should inform FD. If not, you should not accuse people of shyte without evidence. What would you call this?

The answer is right there in the message .... it's called Karma ;D

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:37pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:30pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:26pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. Did you contact one at work? Yes, and I have explained the circumstances.  Tell us about that car bonnet thing you turned the disc with the PA records, into.  Why did you do that? Quote: It's called a hood ornament Aussie. I did it because I am very artistic like that. Yes, a 'hood' ornament was your word.  Why destroy what was many years of great social media history.....for some pathetic hood ornament? Those were the days when we never had the garbage we have now.  [quote]Was this person happy for you to contact them at work?

As he said and as I have confirmed, he was not happy at all and we got nothing out it other than the opportunity for arseholes (who encouraged me at the time to contact him) to have a go at me.

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 6:51pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:37pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:30pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 6:26pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:00am: freediver wrote on Oct 18th, 2020 at 10:01pm: As far as I recall, Aussie admits to it. Not sure about Monk. Your recollection is incorrect.  I have never ever contacted any Forum Member's employer. Did you contact one at work? Yes, and I have explained the circumstances.  Tell us about that car bonnet thing you turned the disc with the PA records, into.  Why did you do that? Quote: It's called a hood ornament Aussie. I did it because I am very artistic like that. Yes, a 'hood' ornament was your word.  Why destroy what was many years of great social media history.....for some pathetic hood ornament? Those were the days when we never had the garbage we have now.  [quote]Was this person happy for you to contact them at work? As he said and as I have confirmed, he was not happy at all and we got nothing out it other than the opportunity for arseholes (who encouraged me at the time to contact him) to have a go at me.

So you stalked this guy at work, he wasn't happy about it, you obviously completely misread the situation with him, but 10 years later you are still justifying it and trying to convince people you did nothing wrong and you are somehow actually the victim in all this. And you wonder why people are so wary of you.  ::)

Quote:

So you stalked this guy at work,

No.  He told me and others where he worked.


Quote:

he wasn't happy about it,

Yes, I have said so.


Quote:

you obviously completely misread the situation with him,

Yes, I have said so.


Quote:

but 10 years later you are still justifying it and trying to convince people you did nothing wrong and you are somehow actually the victim in all this. And you wonder why people are so wary of you.

I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't.  I am not the victim at all. Neither was he.  All I am doing is making sure the record is kept correctly and not as the arseholes would like to re-write it. 

If people are wary of me, that is at their feet, not mine. 

Quote:

I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't.

Why do you need to? And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker? Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

Pathetic

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:07pm:

Quote: I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't. Why do you need to?

The record needs to be correct.


Quote:

And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker?

I am not a stalker. 


Quote:

Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

'Managed to track him down?'  No.  There was no management.  If a bloke tells you who they are and where they work, there is no tracking down.


Quote:

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

If that were the case, I'd be at your next cocktail party, uninvited.

Not invited and you still turn up.
::)

Quote:

The record needs to be correct.

You should get the facts correct as well.  This below  is INCORRECT!


Quote:

She went well out of her way, specifically dedicated time and effort, to ferret out details from the meagre pickings I posted about my life.  She hit pay dirt getting my name from my High School web site.  She then searched FaceBook and found me and the list of my friends including my Grand Daughter.  She then searched some obscure data base of matters in QCAT and totally misrepresented the facts of one case I was involved in there. There is much more, but I'll leave it at that.  She then spread those details at the sewer and that is why Super Nova and AiA had their fun with a Thread about shaving.....which I have archived.  She then posted what she found here.  Not only my details, but those of my Wife and my Grand Daughter.  She could have had a private chuckle, but instead, she wanted to dox, go public and get pats on the head, reward for her effort and posted it all here.  That is the ultimate sin.  (After her initial three month ban for it...she came back and doubled down...got a long ban...and, yes, I am saying that should have been permanent.) That sort of low life has no place anywhere near social media platforms.  That sort of low life has no idea what legal stalking is.  That sort of low life needs to learn.

John Smith wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:11pm:

Pathetic

https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif

My usual PSA: Aussie doxed himself and his family by teasing 2 boards with personal details, some of completely fabricated, others not. Then he would have members banned who repeated or even alluded to these details (that he provided). Naturally animosity towards Aussie appeared.

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:11pm: Pathetic https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif

You really are a cheeky woman Nef.  ;D

Neferti wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:30pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:11pm: Pathetic https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif

"Pathetic" describes John Smith's performance in bed, Nef. Show a little sympathy ...

AiA wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 8:18pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:30pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:11pm: Pathetic https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif "Pathetic" describes John Smith's performance in bed, Nef. Show a little sympathy ...

Thats not what you said when I was giving it to you

John Smith wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 8:21pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 8:18pm: Neferti wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:30pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:11pm: Pathetic https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif "Pathetic" describes John Smith's performance in bed, Nef. Show a little sympathy ... Thats not what you said when I was giving it to you

You have me confused me Aussie & Mong. It seems to be raining men in your life, John.

Aussie wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 7:16pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:07pm: Quote: I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't. Why do you need to? The record needs to be correct. [quote]And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker?

I am not a stalker. 


Quote:

Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

'Managed to track him down?'  No.  There was no management.  If a bloke tells you who they are and where they work, there is no tracking down.


Quote:

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

If that were the case, I'd be at your next cocktail party, uninvited.
[/quote]

You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.

John Smith wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 8:21pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 8:18pm: Neferti wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:30pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:11pm: Pathetic https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif "Pathetic" describes John Smith's performance in bed, Nef. Show a little sympathy ... Thats not what you said when I was giving it to you

That is so Gayyyyyyyy!!!  ;D ;D
Nothing but Homo-Erotic thoughts in the head of you Smith and Peccary.

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:16pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:07pm: Quote: I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't. Why do you need to? The record needs to be correct. [quote]And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker? I am not a stalker.  [quote]Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

'Managed to track him down?'  No.  There was no management.  If a bloke tells you who they are and where they work, there is no tracking down.


Quote:

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

If that were the case, I'd be at your next cocktail party, uninvited.
[/quote]

You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.[/quote]

Hell Yeah.

https://media.giphy.com/media/L0MSaO69YX7elAw5OC/200.gif

at last fd admits what we loyal ozpolians have been saying for years..

hes a STALKER..

why are stalkers allowed here fd???...

have you noticed aussie defends himself every time and always takes someone else down...

its never his fault...

even though he admits to doing it....

he is  always coerced against his better judgement... ::)by some other [usually evil] person
in this case AiA....to do the unthinkable.....

hilarious I know.... ::)

cods wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 4:34am:

at last fd admits what we loyal ozpolians have been saying for years.. hes a STALKER.. why are stalkers allowed here fd???... have you noticed aussie defends himself every time and always takes someone else down... its never his fault... even though he admits to doing it.... he is  always coerced against his better judgement... ::)by some other [usually evil] person in this case AiA....to do the unthinkable..... hilarious I know.... ::)

It is true, cods: I coerced Aussie to call Mattus at work. He wouldn't have done it otherwise. Aussie was completely at my mercy.

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:16pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:07pm: Quote: I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't. Why do you need to? The record needs to be correct. [quote]And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker? I am not a stalker.  [quote]Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

'Managed to track him down?'  No.  There was no management.  If a bloke tells you who they are and where they work, there is no tracking down.


Quote:

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

If that were the case, I'd be at your next cocktail party, uninvited.
[/quote]

You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.[/quote]

https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/3966156276.gif

freediver wrote on Oct 19^th, 2020 at 9:19pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:16pm: freediver wrote on Oct 19th, 2020 at 7:07pm: Quote: I am not justifying it at all.  I am providing the details the arseholes don't. Why do you need to? The record needs to be correct. [quote]And why are people arseholes for pointing out that you are a stalker? I am not a stalker.  [quote]Why do you think providing the details of how you managed to track him down somehow helps the situation?

'Managed to track him down?'  No.  There was no management.  If a bloke tells you who they are and where they work, there is no tracking down.


Quote:

Are you just trying to warn people not to say anything about their work or private lives here because you will take it as an invitation to turn up to their next cocktail party?

If that were the case, I'd be at your next cocktail party, uninvited.
[/quote]

You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.[/quote]

He may be a stalker, but he's OUR stalker :)

freediver, produce your evidence which supports this rubbish:


Quote:

You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.

Aussie wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 8:12am:

freediver, produce your evidence which supports this rubbish: Quote: You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.

Aussie wants evidence!


https://youtu.be/7lvMNLhJrb0

https://www.djetlawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Evidence.png

The truth about Aussie & Mong is so painful you wish it was fiction ...

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 6:22am:

cods wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 4:34am: at last fd admits what we loyal ozpolians have been saying for years.. hes a STALKER.. why are stalkers allowed here fd???... have you noticed aussie defends himself every time and always takes someone else down... its never his fault... even though he admits to doing it.... he is  always coerced against his better judgement... ::)by some other [usually evil] person in this case AiA....to do the unthinkable..... hilarious I know.... ::) It is true, cods: I coerced Aussie to call Mattus at work. He wouldn't have done it otherwise. Aussie was completely at my mercy.

You could not coerce me.  However, you did encourage me to make that call.  Are you denying that?

Aussie,

Collecting information on people, which you have done, to use later against them is one attribute of being a stalker.

You calling a person, tracking them down with the information you have learned is stalking.

Mind you, this is the definition you use.

As to your statement that you can learning nothing from an IP address, you miss the context I said it with because you are not technically savvy. It depends on the Point of Presence (POP) of your IP in the internet. You use a service provider used by 10s of thousands of people, all it will tell you is you are with a service provider. If you connect from a place of work that has there own POP then you can see the company of they work at. (if they area large company)

As to your threat to track me down and publish my details here. Up to you arsehole. I have done nothing to be ashamed of to be publicly outed here. Unlike you.

We need to clarify something -
there are 2 types of stalking -

one is not malicious and
the other is malicious.

For instance in Aussie's admitted example -
he was trying to get a hard disk to help the chat site.
That sounds like a legitimate reason and
no one was hurt.

However - if someone found the name of
a poster's employer and phoned up that employer
to try and make that poster lose their job -
for whatever reason -
then that is malicious and outrageous -
also - possibly even criminal behaviour.
That is entirely different.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 3:38pm:

We need to clarify something - there are 2 types of stalking - one is not malicious and the other is malicious. For instance in Aussie's admitted example - he was trying to get a hard disk to help the chat site. That sounds like a legitimate reason and no one was hurt. However - if someone found the name of a poster's employer and phoned up that employer to try and make that poster lose their job - for whatever reason - then that is malicious and outrageous - also - possibly even criminal behaviour. That is entirely different.

I think that is a fair distinction. Aussie only meant to help PA history to be preserved. So no malicious intent.

Super Nova wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 3:27pm:

Aussie, Collecting information on people, which you have done, to use later against them is one attribute of being a stalker.

No, I have not done that, unless you are referring to me, manually recording IPs (as a Mod) at the original PA to stop the rampant use and abuse of socks to attack Members especially ele.

Having said that, on your definition, you are saying that Neferti is a stalker.  Yes or no.


Quote:

You calling a person, tracking them down with the information you have learned is stalking.

I tracked no-one down.  The bloke told me (and others) who he was, what he does and where he works.  I learned nothing other than what he told me.


Quote:

Mind you, this is the definition you use. As to your statement that you can learning nothing from an IP address, you miss the context I said it with because you are not technically savvy. It depends on the Point of Presence (POP) of your IP in the internet. You use a service provider used by 10s of thousands of people, all it will tell you is you are with a service provider. If you connect from a place of work that has there own POP then you can see the company of they work at. (if they area large company)

That is all Martian to me.


Quote:

As to your threat to track me down and publish my details here. Up to you arsehole. I have done nothing to be ashamed of to be publicly outed here. Unlike you.

Neither have I.  You problem is, and you share that problem with the other stalkers and those who feed off their harvest, that you know only the beginning of the story, and you know nothing about the ultimate outcome, despite me posting many times that if you can be arsed, you will find my name still on the Roll.

Aussie is like reading a Dr Zeuss book "Dox in Sox"

Everybody should use Google and type in their name (and perhaps also family members) and see what is online. You might be very surprised, shocked even.  ;)

https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/2549184591.gif

Aussie wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 8:12am:

freediver, produce your evidence which supports this rubbish: Quote: You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do.

You just admitted to it. The fact that you don't even realise just makes it all the more creepy. It leaves everyone wondering when you will next get it into your head that it would be a really good idea to stalk someone. You're probably doing it right now. You admit to completely misreading the situation back then, after people spent years trying to get through to you that you did, but you demonstrate over and over again that you will continue to do so.


Super Nova wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 3:27pm:

Aussie, Collecting information on people, which you have done, to use later against them is one attribute of being a stalker. You calling a person, tracking them down with the information you have learned is stalking. Mind you, this is the definition you use. As to your statement that you can learning nothing from an IP address, you miss the context I said it with because you are not technically savvy. It depends on the Point of Presence (POP) of your IP in the internet. You use a service provider used by 10s of thousands of people, all it will tell you is you are with a service provider. If you connect from a place of work that has there own POP then you can see the company of they work at. (if they area large company) As to your threat to track me down and publish my details here. Up to you arsehole. I have done nothing to be ashamed of to be publicly outed here. Unlike you.

We have also seen in this thread Aussie threatening to sue and stalk people. And he still seems oblivious to how creepy it is.


Super Nova wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 3:43pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:38pm: We need to clarify something - there are 2 types of stalking - one is not malicious and the other is malicious. For instance in Aussie's admitted example - he was trying to get a hard disk to help the chat site. That sounds like a legitimate reason and no one was hurt. However - if someone found the name of a poster's employer and phoned up that employer to try and make that poster lose their job - for whatever reason - then that is malicious and outrageous - also - possibly even criminal behaviour. That is entirely different. I think that is a fair distinction. Aussie only meant to help PA history to be preserved. So no malicious intent.

So it's fair to stalk an ex if your only intention is to make them truly happy?

Most stalking hinges on some kind of detachment from reality in which the stalker believes they have good reason. That's why sane people don't stalk.

freediver wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 6:21pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 8:12am: freediver, produce your evidence which supports this rubbish: Quote: You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do. You just admitted to it. The fact that you don't even realise just makes it all the more creepy. It leaves everyone wondering when you will next get it into your head that it would be a really good idea to stalk someone. You're probably doing it right now. You admit to completely misreading the situation back then, after people spent years trying to get through to you that you did, but you demonstrate over and over again that you will continue to do so. Super Nova wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:27pm: Aussie, Collecting information on people, which you have done, to use later against them is one attribute of being a stalker. You calling a person, tracking them down with the information you have learned is stalking. Mind you, this is the definition you use. As to your statement that you can learning nothing from an IP address, you miss the context I said it with because you are not technically savvy. It depends on the Point of Presence (POP) of your IP in the internet. You use a service provider used by 10s of thousands of people, all it will tell you is you are with a service provider. If you connect from a place of work that has there own POP then you can see the company of they work at. (if they area large company) As to your threat to track me down and publish my details here. Up to you arsehole. I have done nothing to be ashamed of to be publicly outed here. Unlike you. We have also seen in this thread Aussie threatening to sue and stalk people. And he still seems oblivious to how creepy it is. Super Nova wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:43pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:38pm: We need to clarify something - there are 2 types of stalking - one is not malicious and the other is malicious. For instance in Aussie's admitted example - he was trying to get a hard disk to help the chat site. That sounds like a legitimate reason and no one was hurt. However - if someone found the name of a poster's employer and phoned up that employer to try and make that poster lose their job - for whatever reason - then that is malicious and outrageous - also - possibly even criminal behaviour. That is entirely different. I think that is a fair distinction. Aussie only meant to help PA history to be preserved. So no malicious intent. So it's fair to stalk an ex if your only intention is to make them truly happy? Most stalking hinges on some kind of detachment from reality in which the stalker believes they have good reason. That's why sane people don't stalk.

Show me my admission to stalking. Do you know what that term actually means?

What 'ex' have I stalked?

Where is your evidence which supports your statement that I am a stalker?

There is none, as I am not.

Produce your evidence, not your amateur pseudo psychologist rubbish.

Neferti wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 4:34pm:

Everybody should use Google and type in their name (and perhaps also family members) and see what is online. You might be very surprised, shocked even.  ;) https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/2549184591.gif

nothing.  :)

Aussie wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 6:51pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 6:21pm: Aussie wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 8:12am: freediver, produce your evidence which supports this rubbish: Quote: You are a stalker. You cannot help it. It's just what you do. You just admitted to it. The fact that you don't even realise just makes it all the more creepy. It leaves everyone wondering when you will next get it into your head that it would be a really good idea to stalk someone. You're probably doing it right now. You admit to completely misreading the situation back then, after people spent years trying to get through to you that you did, but you demonstrate over and over again that you will continue to do so. Super Nova wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:27pm: Aussie, Collecting information on people, which you have done, to use later against them is one attribute of being a stalker. You calling a person, tracking them down with the information you have learned is stalking. Mind you, this is the definition you use. As to your statement that you can learning nothing from an IP address, you miss the context I said it with because you are not technically savvy. It depends on the Point of Presence (POP) of your IP in the internet. You use a service provider used by 10s of thousands of people, all it will tell you is you are with a service provider. If you connect from a place of work that has there own POP then you can see the company of they work at. (if they area large company) As to your threat to track me down and publish my details here. Up to you arsehole. I have done nothing to be ashamed of to be publicly outed here. Unlike you. We have also seen in this thread Aussie threatening to sue and stalk people. And he still seems oblivious to how creepy it is. Super Nova wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:43pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 3:38pm: We need to clarify something - there are 2 types of stalking - one is not malicious and the other is malicious. For instance in Aussie's admitted example - he was trying to get a hard disk to help the chat site. That sounds like a legitimate reason and no one was hurt. However - if someone found the name of a poster's employer and phoned up that employer to try and make that poster lose their job - for whatever reason - then that is malicious and outrageous - also - possibly even criminal behaviour. That is entirely different. I think that is a fair distinction. Aussie only meant to help PA history to be preserved. So no malicious intent. So it's fair to stalk an ex if your only intention is to make them truly happy? Most stalking hinges on some kind of detachment from reality in which the stalker believes they have good reason. That's why sane people don't stalk. Show me my admission to stalking. Do you know what that term actually means? What 'ex' have I stalked? Where is your evidence which supports your statement that I am a stalker? There is none, as I am not. Produce your evidence, not your amateur pseudo psychologist rubbish.

You produced it for me. You are a stalker. Your attempts to justify your actions does not change that.

BTW, I named my work of art.

rhino wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 7:01pm:

Neferti wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 4:34pm: Everybody should use Google and type in their name (and perhaps also family members) and see what is online. You might be very surprised, shocked even.  ;) https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/2549184591.gif nothing.  :)

Same here, zero,  but some people have had a very eventful life, almost famous you might say.  ;)

Dear Aussie,
since we are sharing rumors.

(1) Did you ever stalk  Skippy?

Re: Right of reply
Reply #88 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:29am
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75


(2) Did you ever stalk Carly the Crocodile?

Re: Right of reply
Reply #89 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:47am
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 7:38pm:

Dear Aussie, since we are sharing rumors. (1) Did you ever stalk  Skippy? Re: Right of reply Reply #88 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:29am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75 (2) Did you ever stalk Carly the Crocodile? Re: Right of reply Reply #89 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:47am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75

Aussie never acknowledges any of his behaviour as stalking. You have to ask him specific questions about what he did.

freediver wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 7:46pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 7:38pm: Dear Aussie, since we are sharing rumors. (1) Did you ever stalk  Skippy? Re: Right of reply Reply #88 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:29am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75 (2) Did you ever stalk Carly the Crocodile? Re: Right of reply Reply #89 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:47am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75 Aussie never acknowledges any of his behaviour as stalking. You have to ask him specific questions about what he did.

OK - I could replace stalking with doxxing in my 2 questions.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 7:59pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 7:46pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 7:38pm: Dear Aussie, since we are sharing rumors. (1) Did you ever stalk  Skippy? Re: Right of reply Reply #88 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:29am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75 (2) Did you ever stalk Carly the Crocodile? Re: Right of reply Reply #89 - Jun 6th, 2018 at 11:47am http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75 Aussie never acknowledges any of his behaviour as stalking. You have to ask him specific questions about what he did. OK - I could replace stalking with doxxing in my 2 questions.

I don't think he calls it doxxing either. He calls it collecting every scrap of information he can about you over the years just in case he needs to contact you about something really important. Or to figure out if you have two accounts. Or to check you don't change your story. Or for any reason. I'm sure a good lawyer would have a clause for this.

freediver wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 8:07pm:

I don't think he calls it doxxing either. He calls it collecting every scrap of information he can about you over the years just in case he needs to contact you about something really important. Or to figure out if you have two accounts. Or to check you don't change your story. Or for any reason. I'm sure a good lawyer would have a clause for this.

I suppose he could argue that it's not stalking or doxxing until the
information is passed on or used?

Some nights I awake in a cold sweat.
I look out my bedroom window and I think I'm hallucinating from a dream, like the glare after one looks at the sun still remaining... and see a Taxi keep passing my house slowly. Sometimes that hallucination just stops, with engine still running... waiting. Waiting as if trying to get a fare to Harris Park. Once I called the Police. But the Taxi was gone before they got here. It just sits for 5 mins and then leaves. I see mist rising from the driver's far side as if the driver is breathing heavily in the cold night air.

I'm afraid.  :-[

Aussie wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 12:16pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 6:22am: cods wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 4:34am: at last fd admits what we loyal ozpolians have been saying for years.. hes a STALKER.. why are stalkers allowed here fd???... have you noticed aussie defends himself every time and always takes someone else down... its never his fault... even though he admits to doing it.... he is  always coerced against his better judgement... ::)by some other [usually evil] person in this case AiA....to do the unthinkable..... hilarious I know.... ::) It is true, cods: I coerced Aussie to call Mattus at work. He wouldn't have done it otherwise. Aussie was completely at my mercy. You could not coerce me.  However, you did encourage me to make that call.  Are you denying that?

I did coerce you. I forced you to make that call. You resisted but your weak will was no match for mine. You are my bitch.

[quote author=JaSin link=1596843128/112#112 date=1603189856]Some nights I awake in a cold sweat.
I look out my bedroom window and I think I'm hallucinating from a dream, like the glare after one looks at the sun still remaining... and see a Taxi keep passing my house slowly. Sometimes that hallucination just stops, with engine still running... waiting. Waiting as if trying to get a fare to Harris Park. Once I called the Police. But the Taxi was gone before they got here. It just sits for 5 mins and then leaves. I see mist rising from the driver's far side as if the driver is breathing heavily in the cold night air.

I'm afraid.  :-[/quote]



Have you been watching Bates Motel?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kgRFHaNo-Y

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:09pm:

[quote author=JaSin link=1596843128/112#112 date=1603189856]Some nights I awake in a cold sweat. I look out my bedroom window and I think I'm hallucinating from a dream, like the glare after one looks at the sun still remaining... and see a Taxi keep passing my house slowly. Sometimes that hallucination just stops, with engine still running... waiting. Waiting as if trying to get a fare to Harris Park. Once I called the Police. But the Taxi was gone before they got here. It just sits for 5 mins and then leaves. I see mist rising from the driver's far side as if the driver is breathing heavily in the cold night air. I'm afraid.  :-[/quote] Have you been watching Bates Motel? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kgRFHaNo-Y

Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ...

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:12pm:

Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ...

I didn't know that.
Watch the video -
it's only 1 minute -
the poor pussy is scared.    :)

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:15pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:12pm: Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ... I didn't know that. Watch the video - it's only 1 minute - the poor pussy is scared.    :)

Yep. Using that name once was a ban-able offense here Bobby. I know from experience. Don't believe me? Ask FD. He knows. What is it about a man like Aussie who hides, yet intentionally lies about his name?

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:19pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:15pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:12pm: Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ... I didn't know that. Watch the video - it's only 1 minute - the poor pussy is scared.    :) Yep. Using that name once was a ban-able offense here Bobby. I know from experience. Don't believe me? Ask FD. He knows. What is it about a man like Aussie who hides, yet intentionally lies about his name?

That's another rumor about Aussie -
that he deliberately put out false information for
people so that they could find his "name"
and then got them banned for using that name.
That's a pretty mean trick considering that it wasn't his name.
Why would he do that?

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:24pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:19pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:15pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:12pm: Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ... I didn't know that. Watch the video - it's only 1 minute - the poor pussy is scared.    :) Yep. Using that name once was a ban-able offense here Bobby. I know from experience. Don't believe me? Ask FD. He knows. What is it about a man like Aussie who hides, yet intentionally lies about his name? That's another rumor about Aussie - that he deliberately put out false information for people so that they could find his "name" and then got them banned for using that name. That's a pretty mean trick considering that it wasn't his name. Why would he do that?

That isn't a rumor, Bobby. It is a fact. There were multiple names that Aussie claimed were his and a number of us got a suspension for using them. He isn't an honest player.

AiA wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:27pm:

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:24pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:19pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:15pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:12pm: Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ... I didn't know that. Watch the video - it's only 1 minute - the poor pussy is scared.    :) Yep. Using that name once was a ban-able offense here Bobby. I know from experience. Don't believe me? Ask FD. He knows. What is it about a man like Aussie who hides, yet intentionally lies about his name? That's another rumor about Aussie - that he deliberately put out false information for people so that they could find his "name" and then got them banned for using that name. That's a pretty mean trick considering that it wasn't his name. Why would he do that? That isn't a rumor, Bobby. It is a fact. There were multiple names that Aussie claimed were his and a number of us got a suspension for using them. He isn't an honest player.

And yet - looked what he called me tonight -
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1602919413/135#143

Aussie,

Quote:

You are a mousy little gossiping rumour-mongering and malicious turd.  Simple as that.

Aussie can dish it out!

Arsie stalked Skippy!


Quote:

Aussie ignores the fact he demanded proof, which I was silly enough to provide, that it was my name posted. He then stalked what he thought was my Facebook page and started to drop little comments about my looks on the forum. Luckily for me the Facebook page he stalked was not me but a police officer with the same name as me. I laughed when I realised ozzz had stalked the page of a police officer he thought was me, I also emailed the cop to alert him to ozzz stalking him. Cool The moral of this story. Ozzz did not place a permanent ban on cele and he in fact begun stalking who he thought was me. If you value your privacy don’t register at monks forum, ozzz and monk will stalk you. Back to top

http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1526199682/75

Aussie's new name. Stalky McStalk face.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 20^th, 2020 at 9:37pm:

AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:27pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:24pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:19pm: Bobby. wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:15pm: AiA wrote on Oct 20th, 2020 at 9:12pm: Be careful with the surname you just used, Bobby. Aussie had me suspended for using it. You see, it was one of several false identities that he once used ... I didn't know that. Watch the video - it's only 1 minute - the poor pussy is scared.    :) Yep. Using that name once was a ban-able offense here Bobby. I know from experience. Don't believe me? Ask FD. He knows. What is it about a man like Aussie who hides, yet intentionally lies about his name? That's another rumor about Aussie - that he deliberately put out false information for people so that they could find his "name" and then got them banned for using that name. That's a pretty mean trick considering that it wasn't his name. Why would he do that? That isn't a rumor, Bobby. It is a fact. There were multiple names that Aussie claimed were his and a number of us got a suspension for using them. He isn't an honest player. And yet - looked what he called me tonight - http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1602919413/135#143 Aussie, Quote: You are a mousy little gossiping rumour-mongering and malicious turd.  Simple as that. Aussie can dish it out!

Aussie just stated a fact.

AiA wrote on Aug 8^th, 2020 at 10:33pm:

Setanta wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:21pm: AiA wrote on Aug 8th, 2020 at 10:01pm: Is Monk saying that his doxxing, his not only posting a member's name and employer but actually calling another member's employer is somehow not a serious matter? I know of no one else who has done such a thing. Does anyone? Not me but it was of course a thing that needed to be done. One should not dismiss the need involved. Why else would he do it? The world would have ended if he didn't. That you are still here and able to post is proof of that. You should thank the Inari that he did what he did and offer rice balls in his honour. He needs them, he has no balls of his own. That is a fair point, Set. Monk's serial doxxing needed to be done. It was for the victims' own good. Tough love, it was.

Yes - Monk is a doxxer who has shown no remorse.

I never rang anyone’s employer. AiA is a grub and liar.

What details of mine did you pass to Dubyne, Booby? Tell me by PM if you like.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 2:29pm:

I never rang anyone’s employer. AiA is a grub and liar. What details of mine did you pass to Dubyne, Booby? Tell me by PM if you like.

Who did you ring?

freediver wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 6:21pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 2:29pm: I never rang anyone’s employer. AiA is a grub and liar. What details of mine did you pass to Dubyne, Booby? Tell me by PM if you like. Who did you ring?

Lurch ... and funnily enough, you replied.

I want to know what details of mine Bobby passed to the conman Dubyne.

AiA has stated there are photos of myself stashed somewhere—that is also something to be looked into and the photos deleted.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 6:41pm:

I want to know what details of mine Bobby passed to the conman Dubyne. AiA has stated there are photos of myself stashed somewhere—that is also something to be looked into and the photos deleted.

I just checked under my seat Monk. Not there.

Who did you ring?

freediver wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 6:42pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:41pm: I want to know what details of mine Bobby passed to the conman Dubyne. AiA has stated there are photos of myself stashed somewhere—that is also something to be looked into and the photos deleted. I just checked under my seat Monk. Not there. Who did you ring?

Did he say he rang anyone?

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 6:54pm:

freediver wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:42pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:41pm: I want to know what details of mine Bobby passed to the conman Dubyne. AiA has stated there are photos of myself stashed somewhere—that is also something to be looked into and the photos deleted. I just checked under my seat Monk. Not there. Who did you ring? Did he say he rang anyone?

He hasn't said anything yet Aussie. You understand the point of a question don't you?

IQ defamed me on your website. You later let IQ post here, costing you the only decent GMod you had.

There is talk right here of photos of myself being available. Yet you are only interested in ancient history?

Neferti (& co) did a complete doxxing of Aussie’s life. AiA and SuperNova  published Aussie’s real name having been given that by Neferti. That serial doxxer and ban breaker is back here. Yet you are only interested in ancient history?

Who did you ring?

None of your business. Apart from the actual libel nothing was done here!

It was not IQ’s employer—just to end a lie told by AiA.

My current issue of concern is: what information of mine (at least my full name) did IQ give to Bobby and what information did Bobby pass on to conman Dubyne. Dubyne has spread my name around Twitter and elsewhere. I want to know the information that was passed on!

freediver wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:04pm:

Aussie wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:54pm: freediver wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:42pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 6:41pm: I want to know what details of mine Bobby passed to the conman Dubyne. AiA has stated there are photos of myself stashed somewhere—that is also something to be looked into and the photos deleted. I just checked under my seat Monk. Not there. Who did you ring? Did he say he rang anyone? He hasn't said anything yet Aussie. You understand the point of a question don't you?

You don't answer questions asked of you, or PMs.  So why should anyone answer yours?

'You do understand the point of a question don't you?' 

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:18pm:

My current issue of concern is: what information of mine (at least my full name) did IQ give to Bobby and what information did Bobby pass on to conman Dubyne. Dubyne has spread my name around Twitter and elsewhere. I want to know the information that was passed on!

He's told you you, Dubyne I believe said how, I've told you how Dubyne got the info, a simple whois lookup of your domain name. There's no magic or skills involved, I do it all the time but for different a different reason, to decide whether to block an ip/ip range. You flapping your gums trying to deflect from your wrongdoings has not worked in the past and will not work in the future, it will only keep your wrongdoings being posted you doxxing prick. I'm sure you won't mind that epithet as you have no problems having others permanently labelled likewise.

Nope, is not how the conman got my details.

They were passed on to him. I want to know what of my information was passed on.

You going to call Naffy a doxxing bitch? All this crap is just to provide cover for having someone who doxxed a HUGE amount of info on Aussie back here.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:31pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 7:18pm: My current issue of concern is: what information of mine (at least my full name) did IQ give to Bobby and what information did Bobby pass on to conman Dubyne. Dubyne has spread my name around Twitter and elsewhere. I want to know the information that was passed on! He's told you you, Dubyne I believe said how, I've told you how Dubyne got the info, a simple whois lookup of your domain name. There's no magic or skills involved, I do it all the time but for different a different reason, to decide whether to block an ip/ip range. You flapping your gums trying to deflect from your wrongdoings has not worked in the past and will not work in the future, it will only keep your wrongdoings being posted you doxxing prick. I'm sure you won't mind that epithet as you have no problems having others permanently labelled likewise.

Ah, so 'doxxing bitch' is okay.  That's cleaned that up.



So...why do all these people, obvious socks, doxxing, get in?

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:31pm:

Nope, is not how the conman got my details. They were passed on to him. I want to know what of my information was passed on. You going to call Naffy a doxxing bitch? All this crap is just to provide cover for having someone who doxxed a HUGE amount of info on Aussie back here.

Where's your proof of your assertions? You have none, yet a simple whois of your domain name gives who owns it, that is unless you have taken my advice to have your domain registrar hide it. Yet we do have proof from your own self that you are a doxxer.

I have proof, from communicating with Dubyne. I will keep that to myself.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:44pm:

I have proof, from communicating with Dubyne. I will keep that to myself.

Then as far as anyone should be concerned, you are full of shyte.
Jesus H, whois still lists who owns polanimal.com.au. Fix your shyte before blaming others.

You aren't an honest player, Monk: we all know who you doxxed at PA.

I doxxed NO ONE at the sewer!

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:53pm:

I doxxed NO ONE at the sewer!

But you did: Deepthought and IQ.

I did not doxx IQ. I tried to find his details to sue him.

DT was done on my board.

You are full of shyte and sleaze AiA. You accepted doxxed info on Aussie in the sewer, you and Super Nova. That is why this crap is dragged up now, to provide cover for Naffy, you and Super Nova. Both you and SN accepted IQ’s offer of my photographs.

You are a grub, AiA, a real sleazebag!

Aussie wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:36pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 7:31pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 7:18pm: My current issue of concern is: what information of mine (at least my full name) did IQ give to Bobby and what information did Bobby pass on to conman Dubyne. Dubyne has spread my name around Twitter and elsewhere. I want to know the information that was passed on! He's told you you, Dubyne I believe said how, I've told you how Dubyne got the info, a simple whois lookup of your domain name. There's no magic or skills involved, I do it all the time but for different a different reason, to decide whether to block an ip/ip range. You flapping your gums trying to deflect from your wrongdoings has not worked in the past and will not work in the future, it will only keep your wrongdoings being posted you doxxing prick. I'm sure you won't mind that epithet as you have no problems having others permanently labelled likewise. Ah, so 'doxxing bitch' is okay.  That's cleaned that up. So...why do all these people, obvious socks, doxxing, get in?

I'm glad you picked that up, come in spinner!~~j. I wonder how long before it wears thin with me? Surely you support this form of address to other members. Yay/Nay? Monk never called you on it, even joined in. Good for goose/gander? When I use the term doxxing xxxxx for you and Mong as many times as you have you may have a case.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:56pm:

I did not doxx IQ. I tried to find his details to sue him. DT was done on my board. You are full of shyte and sleaze AiA. You accepted doxxed info on Aussie in the sewer, you and Super Nova. That is why this crap is dragged up now, to provide cover for Naffy, you and Super Nova. Both you and SN accepted IQ’s offer of my photographs. You are a grub, AiA, a real sleazebag!

Au contraire Mong. Are you denying posting DT's details, including a photo of a sign with his employer's name on it? I deleted it myself at PA.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:56pm:

I did not doxx IQ. I tried to find his details to sue him. DT was done on my board. You are full of shyte and sleaze AiA. You accepted doxxed info on Aussie in the sewer, you and Super Nova. That is why this crap is dragged up now, to provide cover for Naffy, you and Super Nova. Both you and SN accepted IQ’s offer of my photographs. You are a grub, AiA, a real sleazebag!

So if someone gets your details, or Aussie's, under the pretense of "suing them," that is okay, right? That is what you are saying, right?

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:45pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 7:44pm: I have proof, from communicating with Dubyne. I will keep that to myself. Then as far as anyone should be concerned, you are full of shyte. Jesus H, whois still lists who owns polanimal.com.au. Fix your shyte before blaming others.

Yep, just checked, still has his full name there. It is to laugh. Ho Ho.

It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:04pm:

It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb.

Not as dumb as someone that won't have his registrar hide that info from the public and claim there is no way someone could know that info unless Bobby, who you also say is stupid, gives it to them. I think I know who the idiot is.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:04pm:

It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb.

Anyone is smart enough to use whois.

Have you tried it monk? If not, don't complain when anyone and everyone know your name. Just like in Cheers.

https://www.whois.com/whois

Now you have mentioned me above. I guess I will have to clarify the situation... when I have time to waste.

When I do a whois on my domain I get:
Registrant Contact
Organization:WhoisGuard, Inc.
State:Panama
Country:PA

If I do it on FD's ozpolitic.com?
Registrant Contact
State:Victoria
Country:AU
Email:https://tieredaccess.com/contact/5fd790a8-f117-4b59-b0e8-94c6fdd0e0ac

If I do it on polanimal.com.au?

Well unfortunately I can't post that public information here.

Super Nova wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:08pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:04pm: It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb. Anyone is smart enough to use whois. Have you tried it monk? If not, don't complain when anyone and everyone know your name. Just like in Cheers. https://www.whois.com/whois Now you have mentioned me above. I guess I will have to clarify the situation... when I have time to waste.

Not Dubyne, doxxer!

Now for those who are not IT literate. In this thread is 1 piece of information and a link to a web site that can be used to find out Monk's real name. Clearly it is OK for all to know since he has not protected it.

Since Monk is OK to let that remain in the public domain, you don't have to be smart to work it out.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:06pm:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:04pm: It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb. Not as dumb as someone that won't have his registrar hide that info from the public and claim there is no way someone could know that info unless Bobby, who you also say is stupid, gives it to them. I think I know who the idiot is.

did he claim there is no way anyone would know? This is all I see.



Quote:

I have proof, from communicating with Dubyne. I will keep that to myself.

Do you think from that that maybe Debyne told him how he got his details?

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:12pm:

Super Nova wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:08pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:04pm: It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb. Anyone is smart enough to use whois. Have you tried it monk? If not, don't complain when anyone and everyone know your name. Just like in Cheers. https://www.whois.com/whois Now you have mentioned me above. I guess I will have to clarify the situation... when I have time to waste. Not Dubyne, doxxer!

;D

Anyone is. It's a standard Linux/Unix command line utility but also as simple as using an online whois for windows users.

You pretend you are oh so clever in ridiculous moronic posts like this where you "claim" you answer a question and claim you "know stuff"...


Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 25^th, 2020 at 7:08pm:

I answered a question by Jasin in Environment. I know stuff.

You are so far up yourself it's not funny. Face it, you're a fool. You're the epitome of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

John Smith wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:18pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:06pm: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:04pm: It is not how Dubyne got my details. Hint: he is pretty dumb. Not as dumb as someone that won't have his registrar hide that info from the public and claim there is no way someone could know that info unless Bobby, who you also say is stupid, gives it to them. I think I know who the idiot is. did he claim there is no way anyone would know? This is all I see. Quote: I have proof, from communicating with Dubyne. I will keep that to myself. Do you think from that that maybe Debyne told him how he got his details?

Have you considered you are as stupid as he is for trying to find loopholes to support him? Seriously Mimo, you can't escape the fact his info is as easy as a lookup in a virtual phone book, which is what DNS and WHOIS is. I'm sure even you can work out a phone book.

What is the term for a Self Doxer?

A quick search and you find ............

The full name gives the doxer the access to many interesting things, but the most sensitive information is about your family. There is a vast variety of resources digging you up automatically such as PeekYou.com, ZabaSearch.com, PeopleFinders.com, and so forth. There are hundreds of similar resources actually. And the trolls use these websites to get close to your dirty laundry.

And even more, each site or forum where you register collects information given by you in the specific database, so-called WHOIS. A lot of personal information including name and phone number can be extracted out of this database even by the second-rate doxer.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:30pm:

Have you considered you are as stupid as he is for trying to find loopholes to support him?

I'm not supporting him nor am I looking for loopholes. I'm just saying that making up scenarios, as credible as they may seem, does not make it true.

The fact remains that YOU have no idea how Debyne came to know Monks details. That you have settled on a scenario whilst ignoring what you're being told shows that it is YOU who is stupid.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:30pm:

Seriously Mimo, you can't escape the fact his info is as easy as a lookup in a virtual phone book, which is what DNS and WHOIS is. I'm sure even you can work out a phone book.

Maybe it is. That doesn't mean Debyne knows about it. I certainly had no idea about whois! I'm sure there are millions of other websites out there that I don't know about as well. Is this where you pretend you know them all.

John Smith wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:34pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:30pm: Have you considered you are as stupid as he is for trying to find loopholes to support him? I'm not supporting him nor am I looking for loopholes. I'm just saying that making up scenarios, as credible as they may seem, does not make it true. The fact remains that YOU have no idea how Debyne came to know Monks details. That you have settled on a scenario whilst ignoring what you're being told shows that it is YOU who is stupid.

Rubbish -
I posted a screen shot from Youtube -
many times - of David DuByne
admitting that he did it and
even telling everyone how he did it.
The last time I posted that screen shot it was deleted and I was told off.

John Smith wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:34pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:30pm: Have you considered you are as stupid as he is for trying to find loopholes to support him? I'm not supporting him nor am I looking for loopholes. I'm just saying that making up scenarios, as credible as they may seem, does not make it true. The fact remains that YOU have no idea how Debyne came to know Monks details. That you have settled on a scenario whilst ignoring what you're being told shows that it is YOU who is stupid.

Try using Occam's razor. You have a public database of who owns IPs/Domain names wichich is DNS and WHOIS, it's a well known fact. Why go looking for some twisty whisty, timey whiney explanation? Even if Dubyne is too stupid to use the resources, which is doubtful, why does Mong lay the blame at Bobby's feet? I'm sure Dubyne has more suckers to help him, he knew of Mong's web site.

The simplest and most reasonable conclusion is Dubyne used the internet phone books.

John Smith wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:37pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:30pm: Seriously Mimo, you can't escape the fact his info is as easy as a lookup in a virtual phone book, which is what DNS and WHOIS is. I'm sure even you can work out a phone book. Maybe it is. That doesn't mean Debyne knows about it. I certainly had no idea about whois! I'm sure there are millions of other websites out there that I don't know about as well. Is this where you pretend you know them all.

Why does pretending to know have anything to do with it? It's a tool I've been familiar with for ~30 years. I don't come here telling people how much I know about everything but I do argue against bullshit based on my knowledge.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 7:14pm:

None of your business. Apart from the actual libel nothing was done here! It was not IQ’s employer—just to end a lie told by AiA.

Apparently a lot of people want to know if you are a doxxer Monk. Not just me. And they have good reason to want to know. For example, they might want to sign up to your forum and in that case would have a very good reason to want to know whether you respect people's privacy. Several of them have asked me, but I forget the details.

Who did you call?

Neferti is a doxxer, not me.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:44pm:

John Smith wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:37pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:30pm: Seriously Mimo, you can't escape the fact his info is as easy as a lookup in a virtual phone book, which is what DNS and WHOIS is. I'm sure even you can work out a phone book. Maybe it is. That doesn't mean Debyne knows about it. I certainly had no idea about whois! I'm sure there are millions of other websites out there that I don't know about as well. Is this where you pretend you know them all. Why does pretending to know have anything to do with it? It's a tool I've been familiar with for ~30 years. I don't come here telling people how much I know about everything but I do argue against bullshit based on my knowledge.

I'm the exact opposite, Set. I know everythiing, still I argue against knowledge based on my bullshit.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 11:21pm:

Neferti is a doxxer, not me.

But you admitted to "a tiny bit of doxxing."  When you have sex, or in your case, if you had sex with a woman, do you tell her it isn't really sex because you stick it in "only a tiny bit?"

Mr Hammer wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 11:31pm:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:44pm: John Smith wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:37pm: Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:30pm: Seriously Mimo, you can't escape the fact his info is as easy as a lookup in a virtual phone book, which is what DNS and WHOIS is. I'm sure even you can work out a phone book. Maybe it is. That doesn't mean Debyne knows about it. I certainly had no idea about whois! I'm sure there are millions of other websites out there that I don't know about as well. Is this where you pretend you know them all. Why does pretending to know have anything to do with it? It's a tool I've been familiar with for ~30 years. I don't come here telling people how much I know about everything but I do argue against bullshit based on my knowledge. I'm the exact opposite, Set. I know everythiing, still I argue against knowledge based on my bullshit.

Hammer, do you share this information with yourself when you argue with yourself. Do you reveal personal identifying information with yourself ?. Does that mean you dox yourself if you do?

Monk allows personal identifying information on the internet and provides all with the means to discover it through his own posts and complains when it is used. Is he doxing himself? Should he make more related posts to himself about this until one of him realizes that doxing one's self is not smart.

Could you have an internal argument on this BS and share your collective conclusion?

AiA wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 12:31am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 11:21pm: Neferti is a doxxer, not me. But you admitted to "a tiny bit of doxxing."  When you have sex, or in your case, if you had sex with a woman, do you tell her it isn't really sex because you stick it in "only a tiny bit?"

What happens if "only a tiny bit" is all the way in?

OMG somebody made a Ewe Toob video with Mong's and Aussie's photos! Probably revenge for that phone call ...

Super Nova wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 12:36am:

AiA wrote on Oct 27th, 2020 at 12:31am: Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 11:21pm: Neferti is a doxxer, not me. But you admitted to "a tiny bit of doxxing."  When you have sex, or in your case, if you had sex with a woman, do you tell her it isn't really sex because you stick it in "only a tiny bit?" What happens if "only a tiny bit" is all the way in?

He is Donald Trump?

Oh look. He changed his avatar from the Mangy Mutt for Fat Housebreaker Sausages poked through fences.
To a Butterfly.
Instantly thoughts of the movie "All Quiet on the Western Front" came to mind, let alone Monk's ADHD problems.
Trying to dress himself up all 'pretty' like to hide the dags from  under his tail.

is weirdo thats for sure  I dont know how many times bobby has denied doing what mong claims he has done.....but mong still wont accept that answer..... ::) ::) ::).. so if it helps shut ming mong up  I will put my hand up and SAY I cannot tell a lie....I did it..

I dont mind being branded a doxxer.... ::) ::)

it beats being known as a  dummy spitting door slamming sulking 2 yr old.... >:( >:( >:(

get a life you people has this dubna settled on mingmongs door step by any chance..?? by the sound of it he must have done!!!!  selling weird rain making equipment maybe... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

talk about one flew over the cuckoos nest.do you guys ever listen to yourselves?

cods wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 7:47am:

is weirdo thats for sure  I dont know how many times bobby has denied doing what mong claims he has done.....but mong still wont accept that answer..... ::) ::) ::).. so if it helps shut ming mong up  I will put my hand up and SAY I cannot tell a lie....I did it.. I dont mind being branded a doxxer.... ::) ::) it beats being known as a  dummy spitting door slamming sulking 2 yr old.... >:( >:( >:( get a life you people has this dubna settled on mingmongs door step by any chance..?? by the sound of it he must have done!!!!  selling weird rain making equipment maybe... ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D talk about one flew over the cuckoos nest.do you guys ever listen to yourselves?

He's got intelligence    :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBHN7aJGogY

Of course he denies it, Karen, he is weak and will not adm it to passing my info to Dubyne.

Dubyne is incredibly stupid. He gave hilarious and wrong explanations as to how he got my name  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Only after Poison Ivy mentioned here doing a WhoIs search did Dubyne offer that up.

I know Dubyne knows my name. I want to know what other of my information was passed on to him by Booby.

Booby will do anything for a part on the head and Dubyne being a con man has given him a few pats on the head, anything to keep Booby donating and watching his monetised videos. As a result the Environment—or Dubyne MRB—board is dead with only Booby and lee posting there.

AiA wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 12:31am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 11:21pm: Neferti is a doxxer, not me. But you admitted to "a tiny bit of doxxing."  When you have sex, or in your case, if you had sex with a woman, do you tell her it isn't really sex because you stick it in "only a tiny bit?"

A tiny bit of doxxing 10-12 years ago, stop DeepShit posting filth on my board every few weeks. The filth was spewed up every few weeks for over two years.

YOU accepted doxxed info on Aussie from the harridan. So did SuperNova—you two were publishing Aussie’s real name before the harridan dumped VOLUMES of info of Aussie’s personal, professional and family life here. I also doubt that Naffy was the only one doxxing Aussie’s info there in the sewer.

YOU doxxed Annie, publishing those 15 PMs of hers to you. FD was happy for those PMs to stay public despite Annie’s desperate plea to him to delete them—now you two think you have anything to say about doxxing from a position of moral superiority???



I think Naffy being unbanned has resulted in a fair bit of protest to FD. So my sins, from 12 years ago, are dredged up to take the heat away from the unbanning of the harridan.

Any potential new member reading this crap will run not walk away from OzPol.

Is Monk the most untrusted Member on here or what?
Aussie looks like a more reputable Bill Hunter than the Monk.

I don’t think so Jasin—I did win the Critters and Gardens Mod election by a very clear margin.

Seems to be you who is not particularly liked here—Body Odor did do a lot of campaigning for you and spent quite a bit of energy denigrating me, at least a dozen posts in the election threads and who knows how much in PMs etc?


As I advised yesterday—drop the sour grapes, make posts in plain English and you may find people responding more to your posts.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:06am:

Of course he denies it, Karen, he is weak and will not adm it to passing my info to Dubyne. Dubyne is incredibly stupid. He gave hilarious and wrong explanations as to how he got my name  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Only after Poison Ivy mentioned here doing a WhoIs search did Dubyne offer that up. I know Dubyne knows my name. I want to know what other of my information was passed on to him by Booby. Booby will do anything for a part on the head and Dubyne being a con man has given him a few pats on the head, anything to keep Booby donating and watching his monetised videos. As a result the Environment—or Dubyne MRB—board is dead with only Booby and lee posting there.

All of that is made up, invented nonsense.
Monk - you're insane.

Setanta wrote on Oct 26^th, 2020 at 8:10pm:

When I do a whois on my domain I get: Registrant Contact Organization:WhoisGuard, Inc. State:Panama Country:PA If I do it on FD's ozpolitic.com? Registrant Contact State:Victoria Country:AU Email:https://tieredaccess.com/contact/5fd790a8-f117-4b59-b0e8-94c6fdd0e0ac If I do it on polanimal.com.au? Well unfortunately I can't post that public information here.

But you are quite content to give people instructions on how to get the information.  Hmm.


Quote:

Privacy OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

Bobby. wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:23am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27th, 2020 at 8:06am: Of course he denies it, Karen, he is weak and will not adm it to passing my info to Dubyne. Dubyne is incredibly stupid. He gave hilarious and wrong explanations as to how he got my name  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Only after Poison Ivy mentioned here doing a WhoIs search did Dubyne offer that up. I know Dubyne knows my name. I want to know what other of my information was passed on to him by Booby. Booby will do anything for a part on the head and Dubyne being a con man has given him a few pats on the head, anything to keep Booby donating and watching his monetised videos. As a result the Environment—or Dubyne MRB—board is dead with only Booby and lee posting there. All of that is made up, invented nonsense. Monk - you're insane.

No Booby‚YOU are a doxxer. You LOVED Dubyne calling you the Southern Hemisphere expert on climate, didn’t you? You loved Dubyne mentioning your board here didn’t you?

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:21am:

I don’t think so Jasin—I did win the Critters and Gardens Mod election by a very clear margin. Seems to be you who is not particularly liked here—Body Odor did do a lot of campaigning for you and spent quite a bit of energy denigrating me, at least a dozen posts in the election threads and who knows how much in PMs etc? As I advised yesterday—drop the sour grapes, make posts in plain English and you may find people responding more to your posts.

;D ;D ;D
We were equal up until the last session where I and two others changed our own Votes in favour of you because we felt sorry for a stupid old Codger with not much going for him. The least we can do is give you a Modship and see if you put your money where your mouth is.
Of course, we saw instead what a dirty little liar and false god you really are. Now we see C&C as the perfect little filter to see false you really are.

Yep - the actions of mine are the actions of a butt-hurt sore loser of a Modship campaign.  ::)vA campaign I took up for the Members of this Forum to, in their view, stop the ruination of a Board.

But while the entire Forum of Members can and could see where I was coming from and why 'I GAVE IT TO YOU' (ask VIC if you like ;)). I didn't really want it, but regarding your 'talking it up' - I was more than happy to make you work and sweat for it. You 'just' made the Modship - even if you racked up 20 votes in a few days at the start, from a Minority of Trolls that ally themselves to you here.  ;)

But we know you'll 'deny' this in any shape or form because it will take you down to 'keeping it humble' - a level you can't cope with.

You are a shining example of 'what not to be' for all of us.
Enjoy. ;)
You have Dragon Sickness Monk. The C&C Board will consume you!  ;D
Even now you try to escape from it with trying to belt up other things that have nothing to do with Cats & Critters.
Prison Cells can be very confining can't they ;)

Garbage. This is pure rationalisation of your loss. E.g. just look at your posts that morning, gloating then whining, look at the constant sniping by you of me since. Body Odor did do a lot of your campaigning.

What happened was 5 or 6 sock votes were removed from your total, none from mine. You were never equal in actual fact. My vote increased by ONE that morning, yours did NOT decrease until sock votes were removed.

I DID win the election by a clear margin so most members do trust me despite your claim most do not trust me.

some people will only accept the answer if its the same one they have in their heads.....

I love One flew of the cuckoos nest.. it is so like ozpol...full of nutters...who only listen to the voices in their heads.... ;D ;D ;D

usually the voice of non reasoning... ;D ;D ;D

I will be Nurse Ratched..   wait till I find my whip..

and consultations will take place asap...fd will have to certify you all of course.. he knows you better than anyone.. he also knows better than anyone the need we have to find the real doxxer.....  dark music now please..if human rights gets involved in this   ozpol will be shut down...its thats serious.

Who do you see as yourself in the One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Karen?

Joe the Indian? Tower of strenght?

Find the real doxxer? There is no doubt about the real doxxer, Karen!

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:49am:

Garbage. This is pure rationalisation of your loss. E.g. just look at your posts that morning, gloating then whining, look at the constant sniping by you of me since. Body Odor did do a lot of your campaigning. What happened was 5 or 6 sock votes were removed from your total, none from mine. You were never equal in actual fact. I DID win the election by a clear margin so most members do trust me despite your claim most do not trust me.

fd will present a victors CUP  at the next xmas party sausage sizzle..  an engraved one fd....Bunnings  have a special on right now....

lets get this over and done with.

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:56am:

Who do you see as yourself in the One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Karen? Joe the Indian? Tower of strenght?

nurse ratched   did you miss that bit? :) :)

it is hard to keep up when you have all those voices in your head. :) :)

I just demolished Jasin’s pure bullshit about the election result, Karen.

Careful Karen, you just talked to me.

if I had those voices in my head  I would be deadset worried...

delusional.. same thing year in year out... :-/ :-/ :-/l   

Jasin wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 7:15am:

Oh look. He changed his avatar from the Mangy Mutt for Fat Housebreaker Sausages poked through fences. To a Butterfly. Instantly thoughts of the movie "All Quiet on the Western Front" came to mind, let alone Monk's ADHD problems. Trying to dress himself up all 'pretty' like to hide the dags from  under his tail.

Mong's new avatar looks a bit poofy, don't you think? ;)

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:49am:

Garbage. This is pure rationalisation of your loss. E.g. just look at your posts that morning, gloating then whining, look at the constant sniping by you of me since. Body Odor did do a lot of your campaigning. What happened was 5 or 6 sock votes were removed from your total, none from mine. You were never equal in actual fact. My vote increased by ONE that morning, yours did NOT decrease until sock votes were removed. I DID win the election by a clear margin so most members do trust me despite your claim most do not trust me.

See - pure denial because it makes you look the way you truly are in our eyes, not the way you want us to see you.

Your only hope is to believe I'm a sore loser. Such ungrateful response from someone I put my vote to.  ::)

Smaug "I'm almost tempted to let him have it. If only to watch it destroy him." ;)

Aussie wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:26am:

Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:10pm: When I do a whois on my domain I get: Registrant Contact Organization:WhoisGuard, Inc. State:Panama Country:PA If I do it on FD's ozpolitic.com? Registrant Contact State:Victoria Country:AU Email:https://tieredaccess.com/contact/5fd790a8-f117-4b59-b0e8-94c6fdd0e0ac If I do it on polanimal.com.au? Well unfortunately I can't post that public information here. But you are quite content to give people instructions on how to get the information.  Hmm. Quote: Privacy OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking.

https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 8:58am:

I just demolished Jasin’s pure bullshit about the election result, Karen.

;D
This is the only time you make people laugh.
Monk: "The sky is not blue, its metallic orange!" >:(

Jasin wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 9:10am:

Jovial Monk wrote on Oct 27th, 2020 at 8:58am: I just demolished Jasin’s pure bullshit about the election result, Karen. ;D This is the only time you make people laugh. Monk: "The sky is not blue, its metallic orange!" >:(

Poor Jasin, still hurting.

Neferti wrote on Oct 27^th, 2020 at 9:09am:

Aussie wrote on Oct 27th, 2020 at 8:26am: Setanta wrote on Oct 26th, 2020 at 8:10pm: When I do a whois on my domain I get: Registrant Contact Organization:WhoisGuard, Inc. State:Panama Country:PA If I do it on FD's ozpolitic.com? Registrant Contact State:Victoria Country:AU Email:https://tieredaccess.com/contact/5fd790a8-f117-4b59-b0e8-94c6fdd0e0ac If I do it on polanimal.com.au? Well unfortunately I can't post that public information here. But you are quite content to give people instructions on how to get the information.  Hmm. Quote: Privacy OzPolitic values the privacy of all members. Do not post personal information about other members without their explicit permission. This includes the contents of personal messages and emails, photos, names, IP addresses, phone numbers, locations etc. This includes information that can be found online and instructions on how to find information about specific members. Such behaviour is considered stalking. https://7img.net/users/3715/71/50/82/smiles/758475749.gif

.

---