I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board.

I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany.

This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads.

To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women.

Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS.

Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin.

Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS.

So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie.

I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary.

It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates.

The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

Goodness.

https://media1.tenor.com/images/a1265846659ae11352bde412fd23a034/tenor.gif

at least he's no longer claiming it incites rape :D

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

oh dear... yes avoid at all costs...sadly we have a few members here who also belong to another forum that is best not mentioned.. safe to say its an anything goes forum.... the two members who replied to you are members of said forum     ::) ::)   consider yourself warned....

you will find very few females taking part on ozpol.....I am sure there is no need to explain WHY?..

I now expect a barrage from those who see no wrong in the constant demeaning of women.. ::) ::)

but I am used to it ungulate...

codsie, you think Vic will delete this thread now you've again broken his new rule?

Time will tell ehhh! :D

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

correct.

freud called this "reaction formation"

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 3:48pm:

I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary.

greggy made a bet with Bias that he would leave this forum if Trump won the election.

He is still here hasn't honoured his bet which shows what type of person he is.

He is a troll who doesn't have a life outside of this forum

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:47pm:

The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 3:48pm: I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary. correct. freud called this "reaction formation"

Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy.

Gordon wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 5:53pm:

aquascoot wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 5:47pm: The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 3:48pm: I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary. correct. freud called this "reaction formation" Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy.

yes gordon.



A popular figure of speech is the phrase 'the lady doth protest too much.' Taken from Shakespeare's Hamlet, the saying is often used to refer to people who appear to be dramatically, and emphatically, opposed to something in an effort to hide their true feelings or desires.

In psychology, this type of behavior is known as a reaction formation, and it can, at times, be very confusing. Reaction formation is a kind of psychological defense mechanism in which a person perceives their true feelings or desires to be socially or, in some cases, legally unacceptable, and so they attempt to convince themselves or others that the opposite is true--often in a very exaggerated performance.

aquascoot wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:16pm:

Gordon wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 5:53pm: aquascoot wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 5:47pm: The Ungulate Who Said No wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 3:48pm: I'd like to summarise my first exchange with a fellow posted on this board. I took to task the poster named greggerypeccary on the chloroquine topic for posting a photo of a sex doll along side a photo of Kayleigh McEnany. This could be done for no other reason than as a sexual attack as there is a whole other world of imagery which could be used. To depict a person as being lying and vacuous, my first choice would be one of those swiveling carnival clown heads. To use an image of the mouth of a sex doll, an inanimate object designed for no other use than for men to insert their penis into is a clear and calculated tactic to sexually degrade her. Rape by the way is also used in this way in war time to utterly dehumanise and degrade women. Now, his motivation in doing so, as said by him is because  She's a lying, hypocritical POS. Once called out on this tactic, he claimed he didn't know the image was even  asex doll, merely a mannequin. Right. Clearly a lie, which puts him in the same camp as her as being a lying, hypocritical POS. So the poster greggerypeccary has no problem demeaning women, about which he attacks Donald Trump daily, and he c an without a shred of compunction lie. I personally think Donald Trump is a putrid piece of crap because he's a compulsive liar and treats women disgracefully, and I have the exact opinion of the poster known as greggerypeccary. It's so plainly obvious that he decries the actions of Donald Trump because every time greggerypeccary looks in the mirror, he sees something he hates. The Ungulate Who Said No will no longer engage with the  cretinous poster known as greggerypeccary. correct. freud called this "reaction formation" Exactly like the fire and brimstone anti gay preachers who always get caught with a rent boy. yes gordon. A popular figure of speech is the phrase 'the lady doth protest too much.' Taken from Shakespeare's Hamlet, the saying is often used to refer to people who appear to be dramatically, and emphatically, opposed to something in an effort to hide their true feelings or desires. In psychology, this type of behavior is known as a reaction formation, and it can, at times, be very confusing. Reaction formation is a kind of psychological defense mechanism in which a person perceives their true feelings or desires to be socially or, in some cases, legally unacceptable, and so they attempt to convince themselves or others that the opposite is true--often in a very exaggerated performance.

Interesting. I worked with a bloke who was a typical Northern Beaches dude.  Cute blond girlfriend, good surfer, out fishing 5 days a week. He was the kind of bloke who without prompting would turn the conversation to how disgusting gays are.

He's now married to a very lovely fella  ;D

I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this.

Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 6:54pm:

I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this.

why? you afraid to fight your own battles?

John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm:

Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles?

A hag needs fags, John, and Mothra has you.

AiA wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:10pm:

John Smith wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles? A hag needs fags, John, and Mothra has you.

and you've got setanta

John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:05pm:

Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles?

What battle might I be fighting, Mimo?

Setanta wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:13pm:

John Smith wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles? What battle might I be fighting, Mimo?

the one in your head

John Smith wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:15pm:

Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 7:13pm: John Smith wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Setanta wrote on May 20th, 2020 at 6:54pm: I wonder if Mothra will be along to back up and tag-team with PETApeccary on this. why? you afraid to fight your own battles? What battle might I be fighting, Mimo? the one in your head

Ah...

So you had no idea what you were saying, there was no logic or plan behind it, you just had to say something, anything and that was the best you could come up with. Seems par for the course for you.

its good when you appear setanta   give js someone else to
use his sentiments on.....

cods wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 7:52pm:

its good when you appear setanta   give js someone else to use his sentiments on.....

I find John's "sentiments" hilarious. Gay men like John are always seeking a pat on the head from a father figure which is why he has a hard-on for Set.

Poor old gay John- just doest not make the grade -

all the while denying it, whilst pointing at others..

its the same old pattern over and over....closet gays  ::) ::)

probably why he can only attack members here.... he certainly contributes nothing.... its a cover up....

like getting married and pretending to the world they are happily married.. :D :D

cods wrote on May 20^th, 2020 at 10:58pm:

all the while denying it, whilst pointing at others.. its the same old pattern over and over....closet gays  ::) ::) probably why he can only attack members here.... he certainly contributes nothing.... its a cover up.... like getting married and pretending to the world they are happily married.. :D :D

I think you have him pegged cods- you have his measure- poor fungus will never tie him do the way you have- good on you!

I dont have a prob with gays  the ones I have met have all been decent people...but I dont care for liars.or creeps whos only aim is to put people down because its all they have....over time you get sick of it dont you?...

at the end of the day its sad a small forum like this has to get threads like this!!!!!!

amateurs

;D ;D ;D

John Smith wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 9:05am:

amateurs ;D ;D ;D

not a singe fuNgus in that response JohN- what the hell happened ? Well you did have a crush on me once soooo--------- YEAS

cods wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 6:42am:

I dont have a prob with gays  the ones I have met have all been decent people...but I dont care for liars.or creeps whos only aim is to put people down because its all they have....over time you get sick of it dont you?... at the end of the day its sad a small forum like this has to get threads like this!!!!!!

yes you do and it's very true.

Agnes wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 9:51am:

cods wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 6:42am: I dont have a prob with gays  the ones I have met have all been decent people...but I dont care for liars.or creeps whos only aim is to put people down because its all they have....over time you get sick of it dont you?... at the end of the day its sad a small forum like this has to get threads like this!!!!!! yes you do and it's very true.

do I have a prob with gays?????.....news to me?..

Agnes wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 9:50am:

John Smith wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 9:05am: amateurs ;D ;D ;D not a singe fuNgus in that response JohN- what the hell happened ? Well you did have a crush on me once soooo--------- YEAS

even my dog wouldn't be stupid enough to have a crush on you.

Ugh!

John Smith wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 10:46am:

Agnes wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 9:50am: John Smith wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 9:05am: amateurs ;D ;D ;D not a singe fuNgus in that response JohN- what the hell happened ? Well you did have a crush on me once soooo--------- YEAS even my dog wouldn't be stupid enough to have a crush on you.

so laf. gay men are quite witty.

cods wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 10:44am:

Agnes wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 9:51am: cods wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 6:42am: I dont have a prob with gays  the ones I have met have all been decent people...but I dont care for liars.or creeps whos only aim is to put people down because its all they have....over time you get sick of it dont you?... at the end of the day its sad a small forum like this has to get threads like this!!!!!! yes you do and it's very true. do I have a prob with gays?????.....news to me?..

that was just a bad typing problem cods

Agnes wrote on May 21^st, 2020 at 10:23pm:

cods wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 10:44am: Agnes wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 9:51am: cods wrote on May 21st, 2020 at 6:42am: I dont have a prob with gays  the ones I have met have all been decent people...but I dont care for liars.or creeps whos only aim is to put people down because its all they have....over time you get sick of it dont you?... at the end of the day its sad a small forum like this has to get threads like this!!!!!! yes you do and it's very true. do I have a prob with gays?????.....news to me?.. that was just a bad typing problem cods

;D ;D thats ok...I was just checking in case I had said something....actually I quite like gays.....I think its a shame others find using them to slur others  its not a crime anymore to be gay...its time these guys grew up I am thinking.