Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258

Gold diggers will be in that.  A married man's lover would gain from the extra cash.

One rule for all - as required.

Gordon wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 11:04am:

Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258

So do you believe that every article about marriage should include the downside? Or only the types of marriage that you disagree with?
Its the day after Valentines Day ffs 

This is Australia - not Malaysia - what they do there, same as Sweden - has no relevance to here....

Double the infant mortality rate - double the need to breed and double the wife number - in case they cark it too.

Multiple gay marriage is the way to go.  A married Rugby team would be awesome.

Gordon wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 11:04am:

Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258

My God the Mussies are randy.
Imagine trying to keep 2 wives happy if they were both nymphomaniacs?

Bobby. wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 1:10pm:

Gordon wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 11:04am: Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258 My God the Mussies are randy. Imagine trying to keep 2 wives happy if they were both nymphomaniacs?

Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos

They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women

That's why the chop a woman's bits off, saves them the trouble to even try.

Women in Islam, is a horror story.

Gordon wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 11:04am:

Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258

Are there any cultures on earth that allow this sort of polygamy and don't end up treating women like cattle?

Polygamy was practiced by leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) for more than half of the 19th century, and practiced publicly from 1852 to 1890 by between 20 and 30 percent of Latter-day Saint families but these eventually stopped in 1904. Several small "fundamentalist" groups continue the practice.

Mitt Romney has 1 cow but no heifers. He alone stood against Trump's bullying. Trump paid for several cows.

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 12:17pm:

This is Australia - not Malaysia - what they do there, same as Sweden - has no relevance to here....

the article was written for a segment called 'shifting cultures' ... which people read  because they want to know about, you guessed it, other cultures. Of course it has nothing to do with Australia. If it did the segment would probably be called 'aussie culture' and would feature bogans in budgie smugglers or old men in thongs whinging. :D

chimera wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 12:55pm:

Multiple gay marriage is the way to go.  A married Rugby team would be awesome.

;D ;D ;D.... Israel could officiate    :D :D

The scrum front row is composed of props and the hooker. The three bind together tightly . The number 8 binds behind the two locks, with his head between them.

The referee gives the command crouch and they preload their muscles enabling them to perform their subsequent drive more powerfully. The  referee then says set  and the two front rows come together.

Where is the ABC spruiking polygamy in the article...??

I did not read that polygamy should be made acceptable in Australia.

Frankly I am more concerned about the bias towards the ABC for informing people.

Pedro Curevo wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 6:08pm:

Where is the ABC spruiking polygamy in the article...?? I did not read that polygamy should be made acceptable in Australia. Frankly I am more concerned about the bias towards the ABC for informing people.

What the HELL does that mean???




What it's like to be in a polygamous marriage? Muslim Malaysians share their stories

That's the headline, bozo.

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 4:46pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 12:17pm: This is Australia - not Malaysia - what they do there, same as Sweden - has no relevance to here.... the article was written for a segment called 'shifting cultures' ... which people read  because they want to know about, you guessed it, other cultures. Of course it has nothing to do with Australia. If it did the segment would probably be called 'aussie culture' and would feature bogans in budgie smugglers or old men in thongs whinging. :D

Which is you?

Why do you live here if you hate bogans?
You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire.

Bogans built this country.
You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... ;D ;D ;D

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:44pm:

Which is you?

i'm not old dopey ..


Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:44pm:

Why do you live here if you hate bogans?

no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too.


Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:44pm:

You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire.

thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob


Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:44pm:

Bogans built this country.

no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D


Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:44pm:

You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin

Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-*

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 9:52pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-*

You're full of shyte mate.
You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one.

You...pecca....Brian.
Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it .
Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh.
Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo.

freediver wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 4:27pm:

Gordon wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 11:04am: Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258 Are there any cultures on earth that allow this sort of polygamy and don't end up treating women like cattle?

You mean women aren't cattle?  When did that happen?   8-)

chimera wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 4:44pm:

Polygamy was practiced by leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) for more than half of the 19th century, and practiced publicly from 1852 to 1890 by between 20 and 30 percent of Latter-day Saint families but these eventually stopped in 1904. Several small "fundamentalist" groups continue the practice. Mitt Romney has 1 cow but no heifers. He alone stood against Trump's bullying. Trump paid for several cows.

That proves it then - wouldn't touch it with a ten foot barge pole - Vladimir Koslowsky, known as the Vulgar Boatman.... tallest Pole in the job...

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 10:00pm:

You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one.

once again, you prove your judgement is worth sh1t. Spoilt brat? everything i have I've worked for and have been working for since the age of 13. I've never been given a cent that i didn't earn so keep proving how clueless you are ;D ;D


Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 10:00pm:

Cause fkkk me you carry on like one.

by pointing out that the article is written specifically for segment for those interested in other cultures? 

whats next? you're going to argue no one should read about what life is like in the US, nomadic herdsmen on the Russian steeps, or even roman history because it's not Australian

with stupidity like that no wonder you're so scared of foreigners ;D ;D ;D ;D

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 10:00pm:

John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo.

Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism. 

You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D

Let the Mussos bury the Mussos - our duty is to the real people of the world... we don't have legal polygamy here...

So living with an unmarried partner is OK ? Having 2 unmarried partners?

chimera wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 5:45am:

So living with an unmarried partner is OK ? Having 2 unmarried partners?

Solidify the laws on co-habitation... de facto marriage... these are already the same as formal marriage in most ways - why leave the important bits out and allow people to just randomly form families all over the place?

Living with and having family with the second one is bigamy...

knock knock - "open up , Police"
"whaa..?"
Sir you have a tart in your bed . You had a different one last week and lose 4 mating points. Any more and you get castrated".

"It's the Law of England" _ Basil Fawlty , BBC TV.

" HRH Prince Charles

WE are not amused by your tart Camilla , future Queen of Australia and of Graps.  Naff off , you twerp.
signed
Secretary to Your Mum"

chimera wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 4:44pm:

Polygamy was practiced by leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) for more than half of the 19th century, and practiced publicly from 1852 to 1890 by between 20 and 30 percent of Latter-day Saint families but these eventually stopped in 1904. Several small "fundamentalist" groups continue the practice. Mitt Romney has 1 cow but no heifers. He alone stood against Trump's bullying. Trump paid for several cows.

He didn't have several cows at the same time. ::)

The Democrats are the biggest bullies around.

How many cows do Democrats have?

John Smith wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 4:46pm:

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 12:17pm: This is Australia - not Malaysia - what they do there, same as Sweden - has no relevance to here.... the article was written for a segment called 'shifting cultures' ... which people read  because they want to know about, you guessed it, other cultures. Of course it has nothing to do with Australia. If it did the segment would probably be called 'aussie culture' and would feature bogans in budgie smugglers or old men in thongs whinging. :D

Yes .... because there is a push by Islamic groups in Australia to have polygamy legalised ....

but mind you ..... for Muslim men only.

If we live in an "equal" society, not an Islamic Patriarchal society .... if polygamy was allowed shouldn't women be able to have more than one husband?

Here's the hypocrisy of it all & the reasons why they want to do it here ..... & as far as claiming welfare for the second wife... they are doing it here already & CentreLink know about.

Govts are stupid.


Quote:

Trad supports a call by imam Sheik Khalil Chami, from the Islamic Welfare Centre in Lakemba, NSW for polygamous marriages to be legally recognised. It follows the British Government's announcement in February of new guidelines that legally recognise polygamous marriages and allow men to claim social welfare for each spouse. While it remains illegal for a married man to marry another woman in Britain, polygamous marriages that take place in countries where the arrangement is legal will be legally recognised. The move came a year after the British Government admitted polygamous marriages were flourishing in Britain and that nearly 1000 men were living legally with multiple wives.

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/probing-polygamy/news-story/a9b8890af4c03464f0ef00a7aa70faa9

https://www.https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/probing-polygamy/news-story/a9b8890af4c03464f0ef00a7aa70faa9dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4777260/Muslim-leader-wants-Australian-men-allowed-wives.html

Should not be considered or happening here.

Trad the bludger hasn't worked since he came to Australia.

chimera wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 8:03am:

How many cows do Democrats have?

Who knows...... ask Bill & Hilary.

Here's a list of US Politicians & Supreme Court Justices that had more than one cow & in some cases more than one bull.

1776 to 1899

7 Democrats - 1 Republican - 3 other Parties

1900 to 1969

4 Democrats - 3 Republicans - 1 Supreme Crt Just

1970 to 1979

8 Democrats - 0 Republicans

1980 to 1989

4 Democrats - 7 Republicans

1990 to 1999

5 Democrats - 10 Republicans - 1 Chief Justice

2000 to 2009

4 Democrats - 11 Republicans

2010 to 2019

6 Democrats - 12 Republicans - 1 Assoc. Justice

Total:-

Democrats 38
Republicans 44
Others 6

That includes 1 woman democrat & 1 woman Republican.
----------------------------------------------------

The Republicans were late starters & finished stronger over the Old Money Democrats. ;D

But the Dems have been consistent in rustling cows for 243 years.   ;)

chimera wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 5:32pm:

The scrum front row is composed of props and the hooker. The three bind together tightly . The number 8 binds behind the two locks, with his head between them. The referee gives the command crouch and they preload their muscles enabling them to perform their subsequent drive more powerfully. The  referee then says set  and the two front rows come together.

;D The number 8 was the lock & he packed in between the 2 second rowers. ;D

The numbers have changed ......

Front row = 8 prop  9 hooker 10 prop

Second row = 11 & 12

Lock = 13

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 10:23pm:

Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D

He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what?

And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie.

They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively.

He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html

Valkie wrote on Feb 15^th, 2020 at 1:52pm:

Bobby. wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 1:10pm: Gordon wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 11:04am: Reading this article there is no downside and it's empowering for women when men to have multiple wives. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-02-15/polygamous-marriage-debate-malaysia-shifting-cultures/11814258 My God the Mussies are randy. Imagine trying to keep 2 wives happy if they were both nymphomaniacs? Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women That's why the chop a woman's bits off, saves them the trouble to even try. Women in Islam, is a horror story.

That's terrible.

Quote:

Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women

So just how does Valkie spend his week-ends?

Gnads wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 9:37am:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html

What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::)

chimera wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 12:29pm:

Quote: Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women 4 So just how does Valkie spend his week-ends?

I'm sorry, I cannot follow your twisted cerebral thoughts.

What does that have to do with pathetic muzzo inability to satisfy ANY woman?

My weekends are spent on many things, depending on what I'm in the mood for.

While your weekends are most likely spend surfing the web for porno and working you right hand.

Why bother with marriage at all?  Just shag 'em all - let god sort their offspring out and let the Gov'mint support them .... the man's dream, innit?

Valkie wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 3:01pm:

chimera wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 12:29pm: Quote: Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women 4 So just how does Valkie spend his week-ends? I'm sorry, I cannot follow your twisted cerebral thoughts. What does that have to do with pathetic muzzo inability to satisfy ANY woman?

Please advise us your method of observing 15 second copulation by fellow Australian citizens.

When a Muslim man is taking his livestock out for a walk, how would he tell whose who? Would he put a number on them?

---

Gordon wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 5:21pm:

When a Muslim man is taking his livestock out for a walk, how would he tell whose who? Would he put a number on them?

No. you name them. That's Aya, Aya, Aya, Aya, Aya and Aisha.

Gordon wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 5:21pm:

When a Muslim man is taking his livestock out for a walk, how would he tell whose who? Would he put a number on them?

The ridiculious thing is.

I have seen an old muzzo bloke taking selfies with three tents in front to tourist attractions.

It's absolutely stupid.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 2:04pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::)

Because they want to institutionalised the commodification of women.

Valkie wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 3:01pm:

Ahh, you see that's not a problem to the 15 second muzzos They can't and never bother to even try to satisfy their women

Does Valkie use microphones , camera or walk in and join the happy couple?

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 2:04pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::)

Because they want to institutionalised the commodification of women.

Women - just spoils of war, innit?

Meh, I'd have two wives if my wife would agree and it was legal. What I don't find right is that some are able to and the rest not. Then she'd have someone to help stick pins into the effigy of me and help her with the dishes, house work and mowing the lawn.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HrQ4YQD8UY

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 2:04pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::)

Jack Thompson versus Mo hammered and his 1.4 billion sons and bints. You are that stupid. 

My wife's father studied with Jack. He became a Uni lecturer rather than an actor, I think he learned something, he divorced early and had a string of uni student GFs. I've kept his daughter as my one and only for 36 years so far. I just wish she would stop with the pins into my effigy. She tells me I'm just getting old but I know it's witchcraft!  ;D

freediver wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 6:17pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 2:04pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::) Because they want to institutionalised the commodification of women.

Some may.  The majority don't, FD.  ::)

Frank wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 7:50pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 2:04pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::) Jack Thompson versus Mo hammered and his 1.4 billion sons and bints. You are that stupid.

https://comicvine1.cbsistatic.com/uploads/original/12/128170/2467911-yawn_20smiley.jpg

Easy as pie - the blokes can root to their heart's content without responsibility, and the sheilas can 'do things their way' and be 'strong independent women' on the taxpayer dime!  Just like here and now!!

Just like the Abos, eh?

Couldn't be simpler... only applies in the West though - those easy conditions to actually do that..... the real bottom issue (sic) is pure desperation and high infant mortality rates and deaths of women in childbirth....

Gotta keep that ol' tribe going somehow!  Women are expendable, after all - just cattle and a tradable commodity .... always get another one at the drop of a jihad... spoils of war, innit?

Igor - my evil identical twin - how many of those gorgies on the ABC are happy to share their life and hubby in this way?  What about the senile Ita Buttwose?  She happy with that?

Oh - NIMBY... OK... gotcha... so everyone else's back passage is all right, eh?  Good to know when our educated elitists on extravagant salary and perks are telling us how we all need to live...

What I Truely have difficulty in understanding.

Is why gay groups, women and grubberment supported organisations.

All fall over themselves to support this primitive, barbaric and brutal CULT.

This CULT of DEATH has proven time and time again that it has no time for that which these groups represent.

Homosexuality is a DEATH sentence under Islam.

Sexual freedom does not exist under Islam.

Women are chattel, possessions and simply owned under Islam.

Grubberments are destroyed and replaced by totalitarian regimes under Islam.

In simple fact.
All the freedoms these idiots have now.
Will cease to exist under Islamic rule.

These idiots are the exact same people who supported the likes of Hitler.
But, for the life of me
I cannot understand why they do it.

Are they retarded?
Are they afraid?
Perhaps they think they will get some special consideration for supporting the CULT of DEATH.

Or are they simply feeding the crocodile under the false hope that they will be eaten last?

camera , Valkie?

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2020 at 2:04pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 16th, 2020 at 9:37am: Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:23pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 10:00pm: John Smith wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:52pm: Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Which is you? i'm not old dopey .. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Why do you live here if you hate bogans? no bogans in my neighbourhood numbnuts. Plenty of decent Aussies though. Lots of other races too. Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You don't like the Australian way....so pack your shyte and fkkk off to a Muslim country....or whatever urges you. It clearly isn't Australia that you desire. thats where you are wrong .. i love Australia, all of it, including all the multiculturalism. i just don't want farkwits like you changing that just because you're a racist knob Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: Bogans built this country. no they didn't .. they were the ones who didn't want to dirty their hands and then whinge that the wogs were taking all their jobs  :D :D Captain Caveman wrote on Feb 15th, 2020 at 9:44pm: You're free loading scum I take it? To gutless to call a bogan out to their face I bet... Grin Grin Unlike you, there is nothing i say here that i won't say to you or anyone else to their face :-* You're full of shyte mate. You're not old.....so you're a little pissant spoilt brat then? Cause fkkk me you carry on like one. You...pecca....Brian. Yas fkkkn hate this country. You constantly shyte on the very people who built it . Quite frankly it is disgusting that people like you live here tbh. Do not even bother replying....not worth the time of day imo. Why do you assume that I hate Australia, Captain?  Why bring me into this?  I love Australia, particularly it's multiculturalism.  You know what is funny.  All this carping about Polygamy.  Guess who used to be in a Polygamist relationship?  Jack Thompson.  He shacked up with the Bunker sisters in the late 1960s.   Funny that, a real Aussie man like good ol' Jack living with two shielas, hey?   ;D ;D He was living with & f#*king 2 sheilas who were sisters..... so what? And it was the King sisters ... one was named Bunkie. They shared different rooms & slept with Jack alternatively. He wasn't seeking legal recognition of his relationship nor was he collecting social welfare for their keep. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3027023/Bunkie-King-speaks-time-sharing-actor-Jack-Thompson-older-sister-Leona.html What it does is it proves most of your moaning and carping is pointless, Gnads.  Jack Thompson was living in a polygamist relationship long before most Muslims arrived in the country.  No one moaned about him, now did they, except perhaps for a few moralisers.   Why moan about Muslims who do it?   It is their business, not yours.  ::) ::)

In case it has escaped you ... because they are all receiving welfare for the extra wives & the children thereof.

All on the Govt. tit .... you dimwit.

Thompson & his cohabiting sisters were not.

Muslims want it recognised/legally allowable ....

Just for Muslim males .... no one else.

would it get passed all the moralisers or even yourself if it was allowed for all?

And when it involves more welfare being paid to these double & even triple families ....

then not only is it my business ...it's everyones.

Your rules for some, not for others identity politics  is pathetic.

Historically, Polygamy had been in practice in nearly all continents well before and after the arrival of religion in the equation.  In fact, early Christianity and Islam never actually was against or for monogamy nor polygamy.  That has alot to do with the region in which these religions have originated, in conflict areas, men tend to die off easier, women usually have less rights, and cant really survive without a man back then.  And so, the natural order of things would be for a man to take on more wives. 

However, that it self creates more issue, as it entrenches further the unequal place of woman in the society. 

I believe the we are in the process of change as part of development of our civilization.  When we were primitive, polygamy enable us the edge to reproduce, and for our race to carry on.   As our technology develops, and so is our morals.  And hence, a move away from polygamy to monogamy to recognize equal rights regardless of sex.   The next step would be, when we reached a world society with relative equal rights between individuals, then we would reach a state of - I am going to make a new word:  Panogamy.  Meaning, that any woman and any men have the right to marry or not marry as many or as less, but they all protected equally by the law. 

Tantric Witch Sexual Revolution — The Evolution of Panogamytantric-witch.tumblr.com › post › the-evolution-of-panogamy › amp
Panogamy is a style of polyamory. It refers to a fairly monogamous relationship where two people build their lives together but are open to allowing other Muslims to infect Christians with gay flower power.

chimera wrote on Feb 17^th, 2020 at 11:22am:

Tantric Witch Sexual Revolution — The Evolution of Panogamytantric-witch.tumblr.com › post › the-evolution-of-panogamy › amp Panogamy is a style of polyamory. It refers to a fairly monogamous relationship where two people build their lives together but are open to allowing other Muslims to infect Christians with gay flower power.

I am not aware Panogamy is actually a word yet, with definition.  But I believe, it would just matter of time, before humanity will move into a more secular and science based society.  Panogamy of those times, would be about the rights of individual rather than the whole religious paradigm we have now.   Or perhaps religion will continue to evolve to remain relevant.   That society would be probably a few hundred years away at least.

Yes there will be marriage apps to select and transport partners from the global people for 10-12 minute marriages.  Or programed for multiple hook-ups before work or in lunch break.  World ranking in record mix and match will be an aspiration.

chimera wrote on Feb 17^th, 2020 at 12:11pm:

Yes there will be marriage apps to select and transport partners from the global people for 10-12 minute marriages.  Or programed for multiple hook-ups before work or in lunch break.  World ranking in record mix and match will be an aspiration.

I am not sure if we are talking about the same thing.  I have talking about the practice of marriage, e.g. legal binding activity between two individuals.   And I think the original ABC article quoted is about marriage as well.   I have a feeling that you are referring to sex between different individuals.   That is already happening right now.  Its called tinder. 

It's panogamy. Marry at 9am , divorce at 9.20 , divide assets by div.app and next marriages lined up for the vows.

One Law For All - Or No Law At All!

Gnads wrote on Feb 17^th, 2020 at 9:15am:

In case it has escaped you ... because they are all receiving welfare for the extra wives & the children thereof.

no they're not receiving extra... not for the wives anyway. Children are no different to if you had 4 kids with 4 women.

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2020 at 8:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 17th, 2020 at 9:15am: In case it has escaped you ... because they are all receiving welfare for the extra wives & the children thereof. no they're not receiving extra... not for the wives anyway. Children are no different to if you had 4 kids with 4 women.

Musso in Sydney had four women, four homes, bunch of kids - each woman got social security for self and kids as single mothers....

How say you again?

"Social security law recognises that a person can be in a de facto relationship with more than one person at a time. These are termed ‘multiple relationships’. An assessment as to whether a person is a member of a couple is conducted in respect of each relationship.

Members of a multiple relationship would receive the partnered rate of payment which is lower than the single rate. For example, the basic single Newstart Allowance rate is currently $528.70 per fortnight while the member of a couple rate is $477.40 per fortnight.

Members of a multiple relationship are also considered partnered for the purposes of the income and assets tests. Each person’s income and assets are assessed against the income and assets of each of their partners and the lowest rate payable is applied. "


Sad to think that those weak-minded and low intelligence types among them can be breeding with many women.. scary indeed.

John Smith wrote on Feb 17^th, 2020 at 8:03pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 17th, 2020 at 9:15am: In case it has escaped you ... because they are all receiving welfare for the extra wives & the children thereof. no they're not receiving extra... not for the wives anyway. Children are no different to if you had 4 kids with 4 women.

So you're saying the second wife is not included in welfare calculations as a family?

Fathering 4 children to 4 different women is not the same as living with them as a family unit at the same time.

Is it OK for a single woman/women to have 4 or 5 kids or more all to different fathers to collect welfare?

I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy.

If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:39am:

I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem?

Should they all live in the one house or separate houses?  ::)

Dwayne wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:49am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Should they all live in the one house or separate houses?  ::)

"should" ?   :-/

It's totally up to them.

They can do whatever they like.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:53am:

Dwayne wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:49am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Should they all live in the one house or separate houses?  ::) "should" ?   :-/ It's totally up to them. They can do whatever they like.

Most men have trouble keeping up with one wife, less alone 12 of them.  Imagine the noise with all those kids?  ;D ;D ;D

Dwayne wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:55am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:53am: Dwayne wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:49am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Should they all live in the one house or separate houses?  ::) "should" ?   :-/ It's totally up to them. They can do whatever they like. Most men have trouble keeping up with one wife, less alone 12 of them.  Imagine the noise with all those kids?  ;D ;D ;D

That's their problem - not ours.

If a woman wants multiple husbands, or a man wants multiple wives, that's their business.

Polygamy is the practice of having more than one wife or husband at the same time - where's the problem with that?

I don't see why people would object.

Personally, I think marriage to even just one person is a totally outdated concept which is only perpetuated to keep florists and caterers in business.

However, if people want to get married, good luck to them - I'm not gonna get in their way.

Live and let live.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:39am:

I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem?

Yes it is quite amazing.
I personally wouldn't subscribe to polygamy
But if other consenting adults wish to, then that is their own decision. I don't believe we should be telling other people how they should live.

The_Barnacle wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 3:18pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Yes it is quite amazing. I personally wouldn't subscribe to polygamy But if other consenting adults wish to, then that is their own decision. I don't believe we should be telling other people how they should live.

Exactly.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:39am:

I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem?

Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question.

Kangaroos do and don't have Bridget , shotguns or pork.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 9:39am:

I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem?

Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only.

Do you see any problem with that? ::)

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only. Do you see any problem with that? ::)

Indeed - there is a decided imbalance in the Islamic way of approaching polygamy... men get all the rights, women get to be nice little home warmers and that's it.

I recall a program somewhere about the young men leaving the Mormon 'church' because all the old blokes took all the pretty young women as multiple 'wives'... leaving none for the young men ... is the same thing happening with the Islamic communities, thus fueling the rage of the young men, and pushing them to jihad etc?  It has long been a social precept that controlling the sexual needs of young men has made them ready to fight all the time...

There is simply no need for this kind of thing in a nation such as Australia where people get to survive far longer than they would plucking dates from the sand and chopping the occasional goat while drinking putrid water from a 'well'... and where warring tribal groups don't kill each other's men off in numbers all the time and disease don't take off most of the man as happened to the Mormons in their passage west...

This should simply be outlawed... women are equal with men here.... One Law For All - or No Law At All.........

Let me try this simple experiment:-

One Law For All - Or No Law At All. (stating the basic precept)

One Law For All - Or No Law At All? (raising the issue as a serious question)

One Law For All - Or No Law At All!  (baldly stating that this should be the case)

Which way do YOU see this issue?

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only. Do you see any problem with that? ::)

Only if it was a white man.
Pecca is a true racist in the true form .  ::)

Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 10:48am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:27am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only. Do you see any problem with that? ::) Indeed - there is a decided imbalance in the Islamic way of approaching polygamy... men get all the rights, women get to be nice little home warmers and that's it. I recall a program somewhere about the young men leaving the Mormon 'church' because all the old blokes took all the pretty young women as multiple 'wives'... leaving none for the young men ... is the same thing happening with the Islamic communities, thus fueling the rage of the young men, and pushing them to jihad etc?  It has long been a social precept that controlling the sexual needs of young men has made them ready to fight all the time... There is simply no need for this kind of thing in a nation such as Australia where people get to survive far longer than they would plucking dates from the sand and chopping the occasional goat while drinking putrid water from a 'well'... and where warring tribal groups don't kill each other's men off in numbers all the time and disease don't take off most of the man as happened to the Mormons in their passage west... This should simply be outlawed... women are equal with men here.... One Law For All - or No Law At All......... Let me try this simple experiment:- One Law For All - Or No Law At All. (stating the basic precept) One Law For All - Or No Law At All? (raising the issue as a serious question) One Law For All - Or No Law At All!  (baldly stating that this should be the case) Which way do YOU see this issue?

One law for all - or no law at all(Anarchy)

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:27am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only.

Really?  That's polygyny, not polygamy.

Do you have a link to that?

If it's true, then yes - I certainly do have a problem with that.

It should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women

And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives.

Not just for men only. For Muslim men only. Not for any women or any non-Muslim men. And of course Muslim men can marry any woman from any religion. But Muslim women get beheaded for marrying an infidel.

It's got nothing to do with liberalising marriage law. It's a hangover from Muhammad using institutionalised rape to spread religion.

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:01pm:

Not just for men only. For Muslim men only. Not for any women or any non-Muslim men. And of course Muslim men can marry any woman from any religion. But Muslim women get beheaded for marrying an infidel. It's got nothing to do with liberalising marriage law. It's a hangover from Muhammad using institutionalised rape to spread religion.

Can you provide evidence of this?

I asked Gnads, but sadly he couldn't.

Can you help him out?

Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant?

Why do you keep running away from this question?


freediver wrote on Feb 18^th, 2020 at 6:48pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question.

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:05pm:

Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant?

it wasn't just Mohammed. Centuries ago, in southern Italy, the lord of the land, or his representatives, had the right to bed any bride in his on her wedding night, before her husband. Whether she wanted to or not. Getting married in secret so as to avoid  this was punishable by death. I believe this tradition also applied in the UK once upon a time.

So you agree that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion?

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:17pm:

So you agree that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion?

no idea ..... I'm not read up on muhammed.

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:05pm:

Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question.

I'm just asking a question.

Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only."

I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that.

If it's true, I don't support it.

If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women.

And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives.

Where's the problem in that?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:21pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question. I'm just asking a question. Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only." I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that. If it's true, I don't support it. If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women. And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. Where's the problem in that?

Have you been living under a rock?

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:32pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:21pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question. I'm just asking a question. Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only." I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that. If it's true, I don't support it. If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women. And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. Where's the problem in that? Have you been living under a rock?

Do you have the proof or not?

And if you do, I don't support that idea.

It should be available for men and women.

In fact, that's what polygamy is: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time".

If it's only about men, the thread title should be changed to: "ABC spruiking Islamic polygyny".

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 1:54pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:27am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only. Really?  That's polygyny, not polygamy. Do you have a link to that? If it's true, then yes - I certainly do have a problem with that. It should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives.

When they have more than one wife it's still polygamy.

Muslims don't want women to have more than one partner/ husband.

You are just nitpicking.

I've already posted links to the comments made by Keysar Trad.

You saying you haven't seen them is bullshit because you are always here.


Quote:

Hanefa Trad(his wife) admitted some of the marriages were about men wanting sex with more women. But she said if the relationship was done in the right way it could avoid the man going to a prostitute or dating a woman for one night and leaving her.

Quote:

Where Islamic polygamy is allowed, women are not allowed multiple husbands. Under Sharia law, an Islam legal system, a man can divorce a woman by saying 'I divorce you' three times but a woman does not have this same privilege.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4777260/Muslim-leader-wants-Australian-men-allowed-wives.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4939516/Keysar-Trad-says-men-second-wife-doing-women-favour.html

Any inkling the quotes above that it's for anyone else but the Muslim men?  ::)

Edit : - RE-READ Peccarhead you pedantic twat.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:37pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:21pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question. I'm just asking a question. Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only." I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that. If it's true, I don't support it. If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women. And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. Where's the problem in that? Have you been living under a rock? Do you have the proof or not? And if you do, I don't support that idea. It should be available for men and women. In fact, that's what polygamy is: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time". If it's only about men, the thread title should be changed to: "ABC spruiking Islamic polygyny".

I am still not sure what you want me to produce evidence of. There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy, for men only. You were part of those conversations. Same thing in the media on a regular basis. So, have you been living under a rock, or are you just being a pedant?

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:45pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:37pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:32pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:21pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question. I'm just asking a question. Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only." I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that. If it's true, I don't support it. If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women. And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. Where's the problem in that? Have you been living under a rock? Do you have the proof or not? And if you do, I don't support that idea. It should be available for men and women. In fact, that's what polygamy is: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time". If it's only about men, the thread title should be changed to: "ABC spruiking Islamic polygyny". I am still not sure what you want me to produce evidence of.

This:

"Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only."

Bloody slimers at it again.

Why can't they just go and live in a Muslim orientated country?
We all know the countries run by Muslim law...they're shytholes, so farrkkk off over there and have your polygamy. 

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:45pm:

There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ...

Polygamy is for men and women.

If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:50pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny.

What a female primary sexual characteristic you are!!!

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:02pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:01pm: Not just for men only. For Muslim men only. Not for any women or any non-Muslim men. And of course Muslim men can marry any woman from any religion. But Muslim women get beheaded for marrying an infidel. It's got nothing to do with liberalising marriage law. It's a hangover from Muhammad using institutionalised rape to spread religion. Can you provide evidence of this? I asked Gnads, but sadly he couldn't. Can you help him out?

Farcough Peccar

I don't sit in this forum all day like you.

Frank wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:55pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. What a female primary sexual characteristic you are!!!

You don't like facts, do you?

"ABC spruiking Islamic polygamy".

polygamy: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time."

polygyny: "the practice of a man having more than one wife simultaneously."

Are they spruiking polygamy or polygyny?

I'm curious.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:21pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:05pm: Greg are you denying that Muhammad used institutionalised rape to spread religion? Or just being a pedant? Why do you keep running away from this question? freediver wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 6:48pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Can you point out a society where polygamy is institutionalised that you think is an improvement on ours? What I don't understand is why people like you always avoid this question. I'm just asking a question. Gnads said: "Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only." I'm just wondering if he has some proof of that. If it's true, I don't support it. If it's going to be made legal, polygamy should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women. And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. Where's the problem in that?

And that should apply to all those minorities wanting acts of legislation enacted to suit specific groups .... should stay the hell out of everyone elses lives. 

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:59pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. What a female primary sexual characteristic you are!!! You don't like facts, do you? "ABC spruiking Islamic polygamy". polygamy: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time." polygyny: "the practice of a man having more than one wife simultaneously." Are they spruiking polygamy or polygyny? I'm curious.

You're just being a pedantic nitpicker.

Anyone can look up a dictionary.

In this matter it's irrelevant.

The point is that one group of men - Muslims - want to be able to have multiple wives - they do not want their wives to have multiple husbands & say that Sharia Law forbids it.

They are not lobbying for any non muslim men, non muslim women and definitely not Muslim women either.

The information is readily available ... you're just being a big fat TNUC.

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:40pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 1:54pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:27am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18th, 2020 at 9:39am: I've never understood why people are opposed to polygamy. If a woman wants ten husbands, or a man wants 12 wives, and all parties are of legal age and consenting, what's the problem? Those pushing for the legalisation are men,,, wanting it for men only. Really?  That's polygyny, not polygamy. Do you have a link to that? If it's true, then yes - I certainly do have a problem with that. It should be available to everyone who wants it - men and women And those who don't want it should just keep out of other people's lives. When they have more than one wife it's still polygamy. Muslims don't want women to have more than one partner/ husband. You are just nitpicking. I've already posted links to the comments made by Keysar Trad. You saying you haven't seen them is bullshit because you are always here. Quote: Hanefa Trad(his wife) admitted some of the marriages were about men wanting sex with more women. But she said if the relationship was done in the right way it could avoid the man going to a prostitute or dating a woman for one night and leaving her. [quote]Where Islamic polygamy is allowed, women are not allowed multiple husbands. Under Sharia law, an Islam legal system, a man can divorce a woman by saying 'I divorce you' three times but a woman does not have this same privilege.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4777260/Muslim-leader-wants-Australian-men-allowed-wives.html
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4939516/Keysar-Trad-says-men-second-wife-doing-women-favour.html

Any inkling the quotes above that it's for anyone else but the Muslim men?  ::)[/quote]

Edit : - RE-READ Peccarhead you pedantic twat.

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:59pm: Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. What a female primary sexual characteristic you are!!! You don't like facts, do you? "ABC spruiking Islamic polygamy". polygamy: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time." polygyny: "the practice of a man having more than one wife simultaneously." Are they spruiking polygamy or polygyny? I'm curious. You're just being a pedantic nitpicker. Anyone can look up a dictionary. In this matter it's irrelevant. The point is that one group of men - Muslims - want to be able to have multiple wives - they do not want their wives to have multiple husbands & say that Sharia Law forbids it. They are not lobbying for any non muslim men, non muslim women and definitely not Muslim women either.

If that's true, I don't support that idea.

It should be available for men and women.

I've said this several times now.

So, not sure what the problem is.

You'd support it for men and women, wouldn't you?

There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails.

Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more?

Except for the reasons that have been given ....

i.e. they want to get their end away with more women with the blessing of their patriarchal ideology.

and they want to be able to claim them & subsequent children as dependents for taxation & welfare purposes.

Jihad by reproduction.

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:31pm:

There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Except for the reasons that have been given .... i.e. they want to get their end away with more women with the blessing of their patriarchal ideology. and they want to be able to claim them & subsequent children as dependents for taxation & welfare purposes. Jihad by reproduction.

;D ;D ;D
Sadly for a working Australian male that has worked his arse off to get to a well paying job....this is so true.
Throw in child support and you are...broke.




For a Muslim who had moved here....or been brought up in an Islamic ideology, not the Australian one I mention above...it's to easy. She seeks to take him down like what happens to a lot of Aussie men....she suddenly disappears.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:50pm:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny.

They were talking about Muslim men only. There's a word for that too. Islam.

freediver wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 9:30pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. They were talking about Muslim men only. There's a word for that too. Islam.

If they wanted to exclude women, they'd use the word polygyny.

By using the term polygamy, they're leaving the option open for women.

Gnads wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 8:31pm:

There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more?

Who knows?

It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure.

However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business.

Why would anyone want to stop them?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 9:49am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them?

The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you?

Gnads wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 1:16pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you?

Can you give me one please?

What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 9:47am:

freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 9:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. They were talking about Muslim men only. There's a word for that too. Islam. If they wanted to exclude women, they'd use the word polygyny. By using the term polygamy, they're leaving the option open for women.

What makes you think Muslims would be as pedantic as you?


greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 9:49am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them?

You just explained why you would.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 1:22pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

I reiterate ... what is wrong with you?

Nothing is wrong. He's into productivity and work efficiency.

Gnads wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 8:51am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you?

I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong.

What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

freediver wrote on Feb 20^th, 2020 at 7:04pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:47am: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 9:30pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. They were talking about Muslim men only. There's a word for that too. Islam. If they wanted to exclude women, they'd use the word polygyny. By using the term polygamy, they're leaving the option open for women. What makes you think Muslims would be as pedantic as you? greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? You just explained why you would.

You might need some new glasses, old boy.

I don't want to stop them.  Why would I?

More importantly, why would you?

What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

Greg, what makes you think Muslims would be as pedantic as you?

From Muslims:

Prince Deen  2 years ago
A woman is married for four (things); her wealth, her family status, her beauty and her religion. Choose (marry) the religious woman so that your home will be in abundance. (Bukhari)

Men are also allowed to marry for money.

TheMuslimShrink

BradBrady,

You defined "gold digger" as a woman who expects her husband to provide for her financially. So yes, people will defend that since it's her Islamic right.
------------
So yeah , a gold-digger has the right to many rich Muslims. Shows a strong Jewish sense of finance. "May I introduce my next financee?"

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21^st, 2020 at 9:23am:

Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace.

But when it involves welfare & govt dependency to maintain those relationships ....

as has been pointed out to you

no way.

So again I reiterate - what is wrong with you?

Read the post from page one again ... instead of trying to deflect the post elsewhere & make it about you.

Gnads wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2020 at 11:52am:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:23am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace. But when it involves welfare & govt dependency ...

Don't change the subject.

I didn't ask about welfare.

I asked about polygamy.

If a woman with a fulltime job wants 7 husbands, who also all have fulltime jobs, where's the problem?

Nobody has come up with a reason why polygamy should not be permitted.

To reiterate: I'm not discussing welfare or government dependency - I'm discussing marriage.

Try and remain on topic, and try to answer the question.

What's wrong with consenting adults (gainfully employed, or independently wealthy), male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

Greg, what makes you think Muslims would be as pedantic as you?

Nothing to worry about, Islam is the most feminist religion.   ;D ;D ;D

Polyandry = multiple husbands for one wife.

Polygamy = multiple wives for one husband.

Polygamy has been practiced in many cultures around the world.  China, Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia. New Guinea and the USA to name a few.

Polyandry OTOH had been reported in only a few cultures - China, Indonesia and West Africa that I am aware of.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2020 at 2:56pm:

Polyandry = multiple husbands for one wife. Polygamy = multiple wives for one husband. Polygamy has been practiced in many cultures around the world.  China, Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia. New Guinea and the USA to name a few. Polyandry OTOH had been reported in only a few cultures - China, Indonesia and West Africa that I am aware of.

Where did you get your definition of polygamy?

Quote:

noun the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time. ZOOLOGY a pattern of mating in which an animal has more than one mate.

Quote:

Polygyny (/pəˈlɪdʒɪniː/; from Neoclassical Greek πολυγυνία from πολύ- poly- "many", and γυνή gyne "woman" or "wife"[1]) is the most common and accepted form of polygamy, entailing the marriage of a man with several women. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19^th, 2020 at 7:59pm:

Frank wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:55pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:50pm: freediver wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 7:45pm: There have been plenty of Muslim men here spruiking Islamic polygamy ... Polygamy is for men and women. If they were talking about men only, they'd be asking for polygyny. What a female primary sexual characteristic you are!!! You don't like facts, do you? "ABC spruiking Islamic polygamy". polygamy: "the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time." polygyny: "the practice of a man having more than one wife simultaneously." Are they spruiking polygamy or polygyny? I'm curious.

I am saying you are a primary external female sexual characteristic, Turd.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2020 at 2:56pm:

Polyandry = multiple husbands for one wife. Polygamy = multiple wives for one husband. Polygamy has been practiced in many cultures around the world.  China, Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia. New Guinea and the USA to name a few. Polyandry OTOH had been reported in only a few cultures - China, Indonesia and West Africa that I am aware of.

Polygamy is the practice or custom of having more than one wife or husband at the same time.

Polygyny = more than one wife.

Polyandry = more than one husband.

If that's what people want, good luck to them.

Your tolerance only extends to FOB's.

More or less the same as keeping a mistress....get that in a chauvinistic mans world.

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22^nd, 2020 at 1:28pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 11:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:23am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace. But when it involves welfare & govt dependency ... Don't change the subject. I didn't ask about welfare. I asked about polygamy. If a woman with a fulltime job wants 7 husbands, who also all have fulltime jobs, where's the problem? Nobody has come up with a reason why polygamy should not be permitted. To reiterate: I'm not discussing welfare or government dependency - I'm discussing marriage. Try and remain on topic, and try to answer the question. What's wrong with consenting adults (gainfully employed, or independently wealthy), male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife?

If, if, if, if ........ all hypotheticals.

Islamic polygamy is the title of the thread.....

and it's all for Muslim men .... not Muslim women or any non muslims.

What is wrong with you?

Gnads wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2020 at 1:03pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 1:28pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 11:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:23am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace. But when it involves welfare & govt dependency ... Don't change the subject. I didn't ask about welfare. I asked about polygamy. If a woman with a fulltime job wants 7 husbands, who also all have fulltime jobs, where's the problem? Nobody has come up with a reason why polygamy should not be permitted. To reiterate: I'm not discussing welfare or government dependency - I'm discussing marriage. Try and remain on topic, and try to answer the question. What's wrong with consenting adults (gainfully employed, or independently wealthy), male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? If, if, if, if ........ all hypotheticals. Islamic polygamy is the title of the thread..... and it's all for Muslim men .... not Muslim women or any non muslims. What is wrong with you?

Polygamy is the normal practice in Muslim society.

However there have been societies which traditionally practiced polyandry.  In Maldives and Sumatra.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2020 at 1:50pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 23rd, 2020 at 1:03pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 1:28pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 11:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:23am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace. But when it involves welfare & govt dependency ... Don't change the subject. I didn't ask about welfare. I asked about polygamy. If a woman with a fulltime job wants 7 husbands, who also all have fulltime jobs, where's the problem? Nobody has come up with a reason why polygamy should not be permitted. To reiterate: I'm not discussing welfare or government dependency - I'm discussing marriage. Try and remain on topic, and try to answer the question. What's wrong with consenting adults (gainfully employed, or independently wealthy), male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? If, if, if, if ........ all hypotheticals. Islamic polygamy is the title of the thread..... and it's all for Muslim men .... not Muslim women or any non muslims. What is wrong with you? Polygamy is the normal practice in Muslim society. However there have been societies which traditionally practiced polyandry.  In Maldives and Sumatra.

Practices in abnormal societies.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 23^rd, 2020 at 1:50pm:

Gnads wrote on Feb 23rd, 2020 at 1:03pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 1:28pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 22nd, 2020 at 11:52am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 9:23am: Gnads wrote on Feb 21st, 2020 at 8:51am: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:22pm: Gnads wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 1:16pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 20th, 2020 at 9:49am: Gnads wrote on Feb 19th, 2020 at 8:31pm: There are more than enough legal implications with one wife if a marriage fails. Why would any sane person want that doubled, tripled or more? Who knows? It's not the sort of thing for me, that's for sure. However, if consenting adults want more than one husband or more than one wife, that's their business. Why would anyone want to stop them? The reasons have been stated .... what is wrong with you? Can you give me one please? What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? I reiterate ... what is wrong with you? I can't get a straight answer from you - that's what wrong. What's wrong with consenting adults, male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? The reasons have been given. If it were that simple it would be commonplace. But when it involves welfare & govt dependency ... Don't change the subject. I didn't ask about welfare. I asked about polygamy. If a woman with a fulltime job wants 7 husbands, who also all have fulltime jobs, where's the problem? Nobody has come up with a reason why polygamy should not be permitted. To reiterate: I'm not discussing welfare or government dependency - I'm discussing marriage. Try and remain on topic, and try to answer the question. What's wrong with consenting adults (gainfully employed, or independently wealthy), male or female, wanting more than one husband or more than one wife? If, if, if, if ........ all hypotheticals. Islamic polygamy is the title of the thread..... and it's all for Muslim men .... not Muslim women or any non muslims. What is wrong with you? Polygamy is the normal practice in Muslim society. However there have been societies which traditionally practiced polyandry.  In Maldives and Sumatra.

If you are going to be a pedant, at least get it right.