https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PI_4OcRI5eQ

House Democrats Launch New Phase in Impeachment Inquiry

this is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever seen...

the POTUS is overseas meeting with other PMs and Presidents   and his own country is trying to get him thrown out of office...


how bizarre is that????......what kind of people are AMERIKANS?......they have spent millions and 3 years trying to get Trump.... ::) ::)..


are these people really asking AMERIKA to elect them next time round....OMG...

cods wrote on Dec 4^th, 2019 at 7:50pm:

this is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever seen... the POTUS is overseas meeting with other PMs and Presidents   and his own country is trying to get him thrown out of office... how bizarre is that????......what kind of people are AMERIKANS?......they have spent millions and 3 years trying to get Trump.... ::) ::).. are these people really asking AMERIKA to elect them next time round....OMG...

Trump is 1,000 X worse than Thompson and because Thompson was a lefty you went ape shite about him.

Trump has trampled all over the constitution and the law. Half of his top people are in prison because of their lies to defend him and it looks like many more are going to be on their way soon.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 4^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

cods wrote on Dec 4th, 2019 at 7:50pm: this is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever seen... the POTUS is overseas meeting with other PMs and Presidents   and his own country is trying to get him thrown out of office... how bizarre is that????......what kind of people are AMERIKANS?......they have spent millions and 3 years trying to get Trump.... ::) ::).. are these people really asking AMERIKA to elect them next time round....OMG... Trump is 1,000 X worse than Thompson and because Thompson was a lefty you went ape shite about him. Trump has trampled all over the constitution and the law. Half of his top people are in prison because of their lies to defend him and it looks like many more are going to be on their way soon.

http://www.33sm.ml/smileys/lol.png

http://www.33sm.ml/smileys/processDontgiveadamn.gif

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/a-circular-response-republicans-laugh-as-nadler-cant-answer-simple-scheduling-question-at-sham-impeachment-hearing/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=daily

“A Circular Response?” – Republicans Laugh as Nadler Can’t Answer Simple Scheduling Question at Sham Impeachment Hearing


by Jim Hoft December 4, 2019 358 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/judiciary-committee-nadler.jpg

The House Judiciary Committee held its first impeachment hearing on impeachment was held on Wednesday less than 24 hours after the House Intelligence Committee voted along party lines on their impeachment resolution.

The hearing started with opening statements by committee chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and ranking member Doug Collins (R-GA). Republican lawmakers then asked the Democrat chairman questions on the schedule and process for their sham impeachment hearings.



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/nadler-republicans-600x347.jpg

Jerry Nadler was immediately flustered and confused with the questioning.


This ended with Republicans laughing at the Democrat chairman for his non-answer circular response.

Oh boy.

https://youtu.be/tpaskFgUVVo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SNpVc7J8kC8

NO CRIMES HERE: Law Professor Outlines Reasons For NO IMPEACHMENT For President Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eGqp6iXim4

THEY ARE LOSERS: President Trump Says Democrats Are Sick Amid Impeachment Threat

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA5ZoK1d29g

THIS IS SCARY: Jim Jordan on Democrats Mission To DESTROY President Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilNRG-SgrhM

GOING AFTER BARRON: Lawyer MOCKS President Trump's Son Barron Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izCkx1cM88U

LAWYER UNHINGED: Law Professor UNLOADS On Doug Collins During Impeachment Hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X7EVUdbxZc

REPUBLICAN REVOLT: Demanding Adam Schiff TESTIFY at Impeachment Hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C69kuBMduSo

SUSPEND THIS HEARING! Republicans DEMAND To End Impeachment Hearing

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 6:50am:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eGqp6iXim4 THEY ARE LOSERS: President Trump Says Democrats Are Sick Amid Impeachment Threat

Yep - Stone Cold Losers

Nadler was even seen falling asleep.  ;D

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:10am:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilNRG-SgrhM GOING AFTER BARRON: Lawyer MOCKS President Trump's Son Barron Trump

what a smart mouthed slut.  >:(

Is this the woman that donated thousands of dollars to Hillary and was hoping to get the SCOTUS position?

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:32am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:10am: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilNRG-SgrhM GOING AFTER BARRON: Lawyer MOCKS President Trump's Son Barron Trump what a smart mouthed slut.  >:( Is this the woman that donated thousands of dollars to Hillary and was hoping to get the SCOTUS position?

certainly fits the profile ,

partisan democrat sycophant and paid stooge

Yep - Thats the one.

Imagine this thing sitting as SCOTUS

what a hag.


Quote:

Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Pam Karlan Donated Thousands to Hillary and Was on Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off! “Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said. Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in. The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/angry-dem-impeachment-witness-pam-karlan-donated-thousands-to-hillary-and-was-on-clintons-list-for-potential-scotus-nomination/

---

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:42am:

Yep - Thats the one. Imagine this thing sitting as SCOTUS what a hag. Quote: Angry Dem Impeachment ‘Witness’ Pam Karlan Donated Thousands to Hillary and Was on Clinton’s List For Potential SCOTUS Nomination One of the witnesses the Dems rolled out is an angry Hillary Clinton donor who was on Crooked’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. No wonder why this unhinged, dowdy woman is so pissed off! “Professor Pam Karlan donated thousands of dollars to Democrats and was on Hillary Clinton’s list for a potential Supreme Court nomination. So she certainly has no vendetta against President Trump,” GOP Rep. Mark Walker said. Congressman Walker also pointed out that Noah Feldman, the Dems first partisan witness in Wednesday’s hearing tweeted about impeaching Trump right after he was sworn in. The entire sham show trial is stacked with partisan hacks who have wanted to impeach Trump from the moment he won in November of 2016. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/angry-dem-impeachment-witness-pam-karlan-donated-thousands-to-hillary-and-was-on-clintons-list-for-potential-scotus-nomination/

BINGO *

another Democrat sycophant and concealed scumbag revealed !

well done SerialBrain9 !

Quote:

Melania Trump ✔ @FLOTUS A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.

Well said First Lady

---

Trump's only defence he has left is pretending to be busy, ala Clinton when he was facing impeachment and then claiming the other side are wasting time and not doing their job because look how good Trump is doing....

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:09am:

Quote: Melania Trump ✔ @FLOTUS A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it. Well said First Lady

FLOTUS is RIGHT !

this skag Pamela Karlan is a total disgrace

https://media.tenor.com/images/a6fe8f02d22eafbb2e8197d16386f5ea/tenor.gif

Watch Nadler start to nod off in his own impeachment witch hunt  ;D

https://twitter.com/joeascioti/status/1202322466053472260?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1202322466053472260&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2019%2F12%2Fboring-house-judiciary-chairman-jerrold-nadler-nods-off-during-his-own-impeachment-hearing-video%2F

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:23am:

Watch Nadler start to nod off in his own impeachment witch hunt  ;D https://twitter.com/joeascioti/status/1202322466053472260?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1202322466053472260&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thegatewaypundit.com%2F2019%2F12%2Fboring-house-judiciary-chairman-jerrold-nadler-nods-off-during-his-own-impeachment-hearing-video%2F

HOLY $#@% !

what a loser

https://twitter.com/steveguest/status/1202320359443369984

Tucker exposes the Leftwing Liberal Bias Hacks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mvw56PsZYrA&t

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhARMtBnSQQ

Jonathan Turley Refutes Basis for Impeaching President Trump

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=086mqut2uZo

'IMPEACHMENT SHAM': GOP members UPSET over hearing with legal scholars

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar.

Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail).

Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail)

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:45pm:

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful you couldn't have obstruction. Deeply flawed argument but at least an argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty.

I know, but that's our dear one's case.

It_is_the_light, no?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:45pm:

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail)

and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ?

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 3:45pm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhARMtBnSQQ Jonathan Turley Refutes Basis for Impeaching President Trump

man Puff N Stuff was sure rambling on ?

The big question to come out of this Puff N Stuff squark is how many wacky conspiracy theories did he quote?




Apparently Biden is guilty of something because he can't form a coherent sentence ? by the way Puff didn't exactly get close to a coherent sentence either.


Quote:

Then we have I never heard Obama saying he wanted to fire the prosecutor ?

Well no you wouldn’t it’s a state department decision ?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:45pm:

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail).

Oh, it's true.

If you hold up a bank but they refuse to hand over the money, it's not really a crime.

Everybody's saying it.

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:26pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ?

Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:50pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences.

so Puddle Duck has nothing - apart from his wet dreams.

umm, yeah. :D

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 9:02pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:50pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences. so Puddle Duck has nothing - apart from his wet dreams. umm, yeah. :D

Full Disclosure, I have not had time to read the House's report yet, but Serial, have you?

The summaries are damning.  Trump is in serious trouble.

But you're still sitting there with your fingers in your ears yelling "LA LA LA LA LA LA"?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vgBYiglLaU

Pelosi Asks for Impeachment Articles, As the Democrats Melt Down

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO_37uwtLEk

Kellyanne Conway slams Pamela Karlan: 'Who the hell are you lady'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLU11AXWvXE

Gaetz explodes at impeachment witnesses: You don't get to interrupt me

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ns74R7zJJZQ

Watch full video of Nancy Pelosi's impeachment statement

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:50pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences.

All of which has been disproven Son!

The Ukrainian leader and the prosecutor both gave affidavits. There was no quid pro quo - fact!

However there is obstruction of justice by .. the Democrats.

They have used every possible connivance to prevent an investigation that was halted by Joe into Burisma and the Russian hoax. Not to mention Giuliani's own investigation that the Dems have attempted to torpedo.

So why are having this embarrassing charade? Because they know that Joe is guilty and an investigation will open a Pandora's box of criminal activity.

Rackets will end, many will go to jail and there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth! And the World will be a better place! Go Trump!

Its called justice Ducky Boy!

 

Richdude wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 5:59am:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:50pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences. All of which has been disproven Son! The Ukrainian leader and the prosecutor both gave affidavits. There was no quid pro quo - fact! However there is obstruction of justice by .. the Democrats.

Oh really?  Perhaps Trump can let Mulvaney, Bolton and the others he's forbidden from giving evidence face the hearings?

You know, the ones who already admitted to there being a quid pro quo and that they do it all the time, or the ones who objected at the time and it cost them their job?

They'd both been subpoenaed to appear after all.

None of it's been disproven either.  You are relying on the idea that "Well Trump didn't say "I'm bribing you" or "this is a quid pro quo", in fact he said the opposite, after he was exposed, on a phone call he knew was being recorded, "I don't want a quid pro quo", therefore, it's all been disproven."

Nah...  Where is the conspiratorial brain failures you display when attacking your opponents?  Why is it turned off for Trump?

There is more evidence here than in any of the crazy bullshit you believe about your opponents, why are you so blind now all of a sudden?

there was no quid pro quo , Trump said he wanted nothing ..

seriously, get educated Libtards and stop repeating non sense.. you all look very silly parroting CNN fake news

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_edqKUSfhc

Funny: Fox News Hannity Tucker & Ingraham with Matt Gaetz Destroy Democrats Impeachment Witnesses

https://www.westernjournal.com/pelosi-brags-heart-full-love-warns-reporter-not-mess/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal

Pelosi Brags of 'Heart Full of Love,' Then Warns Reporter Not To Mess with Her


Quote:

Q: "Do you hate the president?" @SpeakerPelosi: "I don't hate anybody…As a Catholic, I resent your using the word hate in a sentence that addresses me. I don't hate anyone…So, don't mess with me when it comes to words like that."

https://i.imgflip.com/3ijp0l.jpg

PELOSI DRUNK OFF HER ASS TOTALLY FREAKS OUT AT REPORTER !!

Watch :

https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1202622105130549248

https://www.westernjournal.com/found-footage-dems-expert-witness-admits-deep-seated-hatred-trump/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-WJ&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=western-journal

https://i.imgflip.com/3ijqhv.jpg

Found Footage: Dems' 'Expert Witness' Admits Deep-Seated Hatred of Trump


By Jared Harris
Published December 5, 2019 at 12:05pm


One of the Democrats’ so-called expert witnesses disliked President Donald Trump long before the Ukraine phone call that is now the subject of the impeachment inquiry against him.

Rediscovered footage shows Stanford Law School professor Pamela Karlan at the 2017 American Constitution Society National Convention explaining just how far her hatred of Trump goes.

Karlan chairs the ACS board of directors, where she uses her elitist law background to push her viewpoints to the nation.

“I came in from the airport yesterday and I got off the bus from Dulles down at L’Enfant Plaza and I walked up to the hotel,” Karlan said at the convention, “and I was walking past what used to be the old post office building and is now the Trump Hotel.”

“I had to cross the street of course.”

When a fellow panelist asked if she was staying there, Karlan had a stark reply.

“God no,” she said to laughs from the audience. “Never.”

Watch the exchange below.

https://twitter.com/jason_howerton/status/1202300394300465154

Let that sink in: Karlan’s hatred for the president is so deep-seated that she refused to even walk by a hotel that shares his name.

Considering Karlan’s behavior at the impeachment inquiry hearing Wednesday, it doesn’t appear that the law scholar has warmed up to Trump since her snide comments years ago.

She argued that Trump committed impeachable offenses and testified that he should be removed from office.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 9:27pm:

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 9:02pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:50pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences. so Puddle Duck has nothing - apart from his wet dreams. umm, yeah. :D Full Disclosure, I have not had time to read the House's report yet, but Serial, have you? The summaries are damning.  Trump is in serious trouble. But you're still sitting there with your fingers in your ears yelling "LA LA LA LA LA LA"?

Read the Transcript buggerwit.

Game Over.

https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE

Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 8:34pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 3:45pm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhARMtBnSQQ Jonathan Turley Refutes Basis for Impeaching President Trump man Puff N Stuff was sure rambling on ? The big question to come out of this Puff N Stuff squark is how many wacky conspiracy theories did he quote? Apparently Biden is guilty of something because he can't form a coherent sentence ? by the way Puff didn't exactly get close to a coherent sentence either. Quote: Then we have I never heard Obama saying he wanted to fire the prosecutor ?  Well no you wouldn’t it’s a state department decision ?

The State Department, headed by the Secretary of State, works for & answers directly to the President of the United States. Any such power or authorization must come directly from the President of the United States himself. The SoS has no such Constitutional Power.

The Vice-President has no actual duties outside of ceremonial, or voting to break a tie in the US Senate. The Vice-President of the United States has no Executive Powers given him by the United States Constitution, so he couldn't hold up a dime authorized to be spent on Foreign Aid, unless he was delegated that authority by the President of the United States, who as Chief Executive of the US Government, oversees the expenditures authorized by Congress to the the United States Agency for International Development....aka....U.S.A.I.D.E. ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_9Bt1vZgOo

The Opposite of Three Wise Men | The Andrew Klavan Show Ep. 812

SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 7:14am:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 9:27pm: SerialBrain9 wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 9:02pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:50pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 8:26pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) and what would THAT be in specificity puddleduck ? Attempted Extortion, abuse of the office of the President and Obstruction, 10 counts of obstructing the Muller investigation and a partridge in a pair tree would make up about the first 5% of Trumps impeachable offences. so Puddle Duck has nothing - apart from his wet dreams. umm, yeah. :D Full Disclosure, I have not had time to read the House's report yet, but Serial, have you? The summaries are damning.  Trump is in serious trouble. But you're still sitting there with your fingers in your ears yelling "LA LA LA LA LA LA"? Read the Transcript buggerwit. Game Over.

The call summary that shows Trump breached campaign finance laws even without the bribery that's getting him in trouble with the impeachment enquiry?

Yeah, Game Over indeed, "buggerwit".

Serial doesn't like the facts, #triggered.

https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE

Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 9:00am:

https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it.

true ,

libtards prefer to comment on non fact topics..

there are consumed with hatred so go for the egoistic comebacks

with zero nil facts with a side of nothing burger

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5^th, 2019 at 7:45pm:

All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail)

absolute lie ,

all 4 " legal scholars " are democrat voters .. 3 totally HATE Trump and have written articles since 2017 on impeaching Trump ..total Bias ,

and one of them , Jonathan Turley , did NOT say that at all ..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G3BTOwwqTs

Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor, cautioned House lawmakers on Dec. 4 against impeaching President Donald Trump. Speaking during the first day of public hearings by the Judiciary Committee in the impeachment inquiry into Trump, Turley said that to impeach Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” The focus of the Judiciary hearing, which came after the House Intelligence Committee held hearings in late November, is to define the grounds for a presidential impeachment. The impeachment inquiry has revolved around a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter.

everyone is actually stupider for reading your posts Jimpuddleduck ,

you are a simple minded liar repeating fake news .. dismissed .

Dnarever wrote on Dec 4^th, 2019 at 8:04pm:

cods wrote on Dec 4th, 2019 at 7:50pm: this is the most bizarre thing I think I have ever seen... the POTUS is overseas meeting with other PMs and Presidents   and his own country is trying to get him thrown out of office... how bizarre is that????......what kind of people are AMERIKANS?......they have spent millions and 3 years trying to get Trump.... ::) ::).. are these people really asking AMERIKA to elect them next time round....OMG... Trump is 1,000 X worse than Thompson and because Thompson was a lefty you went ape shite about him. Trump has trampled all over the constitution and the law. Half of his top people are in prison because of their lies to defend him and it looks like many more are going to be on their way soon.

hilarious dna  only a rusted on would compare Thomo with a President... ;D ;D ;D..

if he had trampled all over THEIR CONSTITUTION he would be IMPEACHED FOR THAT.....and that as far as asI know has never been mentioned... ::) ::)..

so maybe you are an authority on the AMERIKAN CONSTITUTION and inform us where he has trampled... :(


btw ducky   its hard i know I wasnt exactly DEFENDING TRUMP   more the institution...

not even then   just commenting on what a bizarre country we are dealing with..

if you dont think this 3 year lets get TRUMP....is not a very bad case of SOUR GRAPES  then you need to take a good old look at yourself....they have jumped from Russians to Ukraine   all basically relying on hearsay...

it wouldnt stand up in any other court room.....even Judge Judy wont listen to that.... :) :)

I am not saying everything trump does is perfect not by a long shot....but he is the President....and the office alone should have that much respect  instead its been brought down where it is purely personal    and has not a thing to do with his management of the country... this imo is doing the Democrats no favours at all... >:(

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 2:56pm:

Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) absolute lie , all 4 " legal scholars " are democrat voters .. 3 totally HATE Trump and have written articles since 2017 on impeaching Trump ..total Bias , and one of them , Jonathan Turley , did NOT say that at all .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G3BTOwwqTs Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor, cautioned House lawmakers on Dec. 4 against impeaching President Donald Trump. Speaking during the first day of public hearings by the Judiciary Committee in the impeachment inquiry into Trump, Turley said that to impeach Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” The focus of the Judiciary hearing, which came after the House Intelligence Committee held hearings in late November, is to define the grounds for a presidential impeachment. The impeachment inquiry has revolved around a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. everyone is actually stupider for reading your posts Jimpuddleduck , you are a simple minded liar repeating fake news .. dismissed .

dna is blinded because he is so rusted on.....he will believe anything thats bad about Trump...just the same as he does in this country.....not his team... they are ALL crook   >:(

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 9:00am:

https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it.

only the lefties frank.....Hillary is still pretending shes over it.... ;D ;D.. but as you can see by our lefty chums here.......

they cant stand hes in the oval office  it was all prepared for Hills..... :'( :'( :'(..

all I can think is   the Democrats are not that sure they will win next time round either...because what they are doing and SPENDING  we forget that bit...on this  cant really be going down well with Amerikan voters....

if I was an American I would be furious  3 long bloody years of not accepting they lost.....

its beyond being reasonable.

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 9:00am:

https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it.

Hillary received nearly three million more votes than Trump.

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 5:02pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 9:00am: https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it. Hillary received nearly three million more votes than Trump.

But everyone knows, EVEN you, TURD, that it doesn't work like that. Not even here.  Electoral Colleges there, electorates here.

Yet you keep playing the sore, resentful, thick and incomprehending loser that you are. Sad.

cods wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 3:41pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 2:56pm: Dnarever wrote on Dec 5th, 2019 at 7:45pm: All four Legal scholars agreed that Trump should be impeached if he did what he did, even the republicans scholar. Then the Republican supporting legal scholar argued that because the extortion was unsuccessful there was no crime. (Fail). Also argued that the obstruction had to go to the courts and be confirmed for obstruction to be possible - deeply flawed argument, the Republicans only argument. But of course making that argument is conceding that Trump is guilty. (Fail) absolute lie , all 4 " legal scholars " are democrat voters .. 3 totally HATE Trump and have written articles since 2017 on impeaching Trump ..total Bias , and one of them , Jonathan Turley , did NOT say that at all .. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G3BTOwwqTs Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor, cautioned House lawmakers on Dec. 4 against impeaching President Donald Trump. Speaking during the first day of public hearings by the Judiciary Committee in the impeachment inquiry into Trump, Turley said that to impeach Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” The focus of the Judiciary hearing, which came after the House Intelligence Committee held hearings in late November, is to define the grounds for a presidential impeachment. The impeachment inquiry has revolved around a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked the president of Ukraine to investigate former vice president and 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. everyone is actually stupider for reading your posts Jimpuddleduck , you are a simple minded liar repeating fake news .. dismissed . dna is blinded because he is so rusted on.....he will believe anything thats bad about Trump...just the same as he does in this country.....not his team... they are ALL crook   >:(

http://www.33sm.ml/smileys/JerkOFF.gifDNA..aka..DuckBoy is blinded because he... http://www.33sm.ml/smileys/JerkOFFLftHnd.gif

https://i.imgur.com/mdBUnde.gif

Frank wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 5:13pm:

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 5:02pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 9:00am: https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it. Hillary received nearly three million more votes than Trump. But everyone knows, EVEN you, TURD, that it doesn't work like that. Not even here.  Electoral Colleges there, electorates here. Yet you keep playing the sore, resentful, thick and incomprehending loser that you are. Sad.

You really have problems when someone presents facts you disagree with, don't you, Soren?  ::)

Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6^th, 2019 at 9:08pm:

Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 5:13pm: Brian Ross wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 5:02pm: Frank wrote on Dec 6th, 2019 at 9:00am: https://youtu.be/aLU11AXWvXE Trump derangement. People simply cannot get over his winning the presidency. That's  the long and the short of it. Hillary received nearly three million more votes than Trump. But everyone knows, EVEN you, TURD, that it doesn't work like that. Not even here.  Electoral Colleges there, electorates here. Yet you keep playing the sore, resentful, thick and incomprehending loser that you are. Sad. You really have problems when someone presents facts you disagree with, don't you, Soren?  ::)

I have no problem with facts, Turd: Hillary lost, fair and square. You are a sore loser.
Facts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1v9l9V5-O4

Impeachment Inquiry Postmortem: Traitor TDS Dems Spew Vile Lies Through Boneheaded Academic Bots

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2h_vSn8Ktg

Law Professor DESTROYS Democrat's Impeachment Case

Owen Shroyer goes off.

"Americans are sick of your Impeachment scam!"

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1YpJkYvMYaBKj

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5-BjfQj65k

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N2946f5cZY

WHO LEAKED THIS? Doug Collins DEMANDS The Democrats GIVE UP INFORMATION

Quote:

Nadler Failed to Swear in Witnesses at Judiciary Impeachment Hearings Both Democrat counsel Barry Berke and Republican Counsel Stephen Castor delivered opening statements. Berke in particular made several factual assertions — many of which were dubious at best, and outright false at worst. For example, Berke claimed that State Department staffer David Holmes had “heard it from the president himself” when he testified that President Donald Trump was interested in Ukraine conducting investigations. In fact, Holmes had not heard anything directly from the president. Rather, he claimed to have overheard part of a conversation on a mobile phone between U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland and the president. Sondland was at an outdoor table at a restaurant at the time, and Holmes had been drinking wine with him and two other staffers. Despite a habit of taking notes, and despite the fact that he later emailed the U.S. embassy in Sweden about a part of the conversation dealing with then-jailed U.S. rapper A$AP Rocky, Holmes never wrote down what he later claimed he heard the president telling Sondland. Burke suggested, however, that he heard the president first-hand. In addition, Berke played a deceptively edited clip of President Trump speaking at a Turning Point USA conference, claiming that the president believed he could do “whatever I want.” In fact, as the full context of the president’s statement — a fragment of a sentence — made clear, Trump was talking specifically about his power to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, which he did not ultimately do. Nadler’s failure to swear in the witnesses was significant because it allowed the counsels to make claims without fear of perjuring themselves. It was also significant for another reason: when Republicans raised a point of order, objecting to Berke impugning the president’s motives, which is forbidden under House rules, Nadler ruled that the point of order was invalid because Berke was not a witness. Later, Nadler described Berke and Castor as witnesses, prompting Republican objections that he had contradicted himself.

what a smacking joke  >:(

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/12/09/nadler-failed-to-swear-in-witnesses-at-judiciary-impeachment-hearings/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Fs-RVEsFUU

Can you believe that these people have the power to JAIL US! This is one sick display

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN0z_VvD6ok

Gaetz: I may not be on Nadler's Christmas card list anymore

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSbQhUqwEds

It's Almost Over!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYGpGPwOlwA

Robert Ray: Neither impeachment article is a high crime or misdemeanor

when it comes to ABUSE OF POWER   imo  the Democrats leave trump in the shade.

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 4:08pm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN0z_VvD6ok Gaetz: I may not be on Nadler's Christmas card list anymore

what a smacking joke - one democrat donor asking another democrat donor questions that neither of  them have a clue about.

its like the DNC "witnesses" who didn't witness anything.

der  :D :D :D

its any wonder Trumps numbers are going up - the DNC have exposed themselves for who they are.

a lawless bunch of crooks.

cods wrote on Dec 11^th, 2019 at 6:33am:

when it comes to ABUSE OF POWER   imo  the Democrats leave trump in the shade.

the thing is - Trump hasn't broken the law even one time.

but every time the DNC try to drum up something he's done wrong all that happens is that they expose their own crimes.

these people are stupid.  :D

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 11^th, 2019 at 3:00am:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cSbQhUqwEds It's Almost Over!

wow - the Democrats and fake news media are literally insane!

stage 9 TDS  :D :D :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4mbrbMEA1M

Live: House Judiciary debates articles of impeachment against Trump