| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Environment >> Science Discovers The Universe http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1574283849 Message started by it_is_the_light on Nov 21st, 2019 at 7:04am |
|
|
Title: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 21st, 2019 at 7:04am
https://www.rt.com/news/473879-physicists-discover-fifth-force-nature/
Physicists claim to have found NEW force of nature which may unravel one of the universe’s greatest MYSTERIES 20 Nov, 2019 12:26 The finding may finally solve the riddle of dark matter. © NASA/JPL-Caltech/ESA/Institute of Astrophysics of Andalusia Hungarian researchers may have detected a new, fifth force of nature which could finally solve one of the greatest mysteries of the universe, namely the existence and nature of dark matter. The universe is governed by four fundamental forces: Gravitational force, Weak Nuclear force, Electromagnetic force and Strong Nuclear force. However, a fifth force has long been rumored to exist, scientists just couldn’t prove it. Until now. Maybe. A new study by Attila Krasznahorkay and his colleagues from the Institute for Nuclear Research in Hungary reveals that they spotted what they suspected might be a new type of boson in the decay of an isotope of beryllium in 2016. Beryllium-8 emits light as it decays and, if the light emitted proves strong enough, it fires out both an electron and a positron which repel each other at a predictable angle. Based on our current understanding of physics, and more specifically the law of conservation of energy, as the energy the light increases, the ‘predictable’ angle should decrease. Not so, however. The team witnessed an unexpected rise in the number of the two atomic particles separating at an angle of 140 degrees, which didn’t conform to existing models and estimates, potentially indicating the existence of a completely new kind of fundamental boson. Three of the four known fundamental forces have bosons that guide their attractive and repulsive forces, gravity is theoretically controlled by a hypothetical particle dubbed a ‘graviton’ but scientists have yet to detect and observe it. The new boson couldn't be mistaken for one of its existing counterparts as it has a particularly distinctive mass – 17 megaelectronvolts (or roughly 33 times that of an electron). They also don't live very long, lasting just 10 to the minus 14 seconds. The team wanted to replicate their theory of a possible fifth force governed by a new boson but shifted focus from beryllium to helium nuclei, in which pairs of electrons and positrons also separated at an angle that didn't align with current modelling (115 degrees). By reverse-engineering their observations, the team posit that the helium's nucleus could also have produced a short-lived boson with a mass of roughly, you guessed it, 17 megaelectronvolts – hence its name name X17. The latest study is yet to be peer reviewed but the team's previous research was accepted by the journal Physical Review Letters. Once their findings have been thoroughly pored over, we may finally have a solution to the long-standing and often bemusing problem of accounting for dark matter which makes up the vast majority of the universe and is believed to be responsible for some truly baffling behaviour among the stars. |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Bobby. on Nov 21st, 2019 at 8:34am
Could this win a Nobel prize in Cosmology?
|
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Yadda on Nov 21st, 2019 at 8:37am Man's Science [knowledge] is supposition built upon supposition. Which is in itself, a reasonable and respectable process, so long as it respects truth [i.e. what truth reveals to us]. But even with all of our many, many advances in knowledge, mankind [so long as truth is respected], is still merely, as it were, an individual holding a single lighted candle, as he explores his 'darkened' surroundings, making new 'discoveries' from time to time. We [mankind] still, know very little, about our true circumstances. ....acknowledged here; it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 21st, 2019 at 7:04am:
Job 26:7 He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing. IMAGE http://www.seoco.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ii_earth_in_space.gif Jeremiah 31:37 Thus saith the LORD; If heaven above can be measured, and the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel for all that they have done, saith the LORD. Q. How big is the universe, does mankind with all of his 'awesome knowledge' yet know ? No, he doesn't. That was a bold declaration of 'Jeremiah', which was made some 2,600 years ago. When Jeremiah wrote those words, he could not know how 'wise' and knowledgeable mankind would become in this present modern, scientific age. Yet the bible has not yet been invalidated, by the 'upending', of that particular declaration by Jeremiah. And we know today, that the earth has no 'foundations', it simply 'hangs there' in space. Stated in O.T. scripture, thousands of years ago. |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by juliar on Nov 21st, 2019 at 10:41am
Yadda Yadda never misses a chance to try to convert everybody to ISLAM.
|
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Yadda on Nov 21st, 2019 at 2:23pm juliar wrote on Nov 21st, 2019 at 10:41am:
I don't know why you would think that i want to ? You are posting nonsensical gibberish. 'juliar' is most likely simply another mis-coded bot, posting illogical gibberish. http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1572143512/3#3 |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by lee on Nov 21st, 2019 at 2:51pm
Will it solve the difference in calculations on the expansion of the universe?
|
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 21st, 2019 at 6:17pm lee wrote on Nov 21st, 2019 at 2:51pm:
let us look and back engineer where the UNIVERSE ( one verse ) came from shall we ? |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 21st, 2019 at 6:17pm
http://motls.blogspot.com.au/2015/01/mysterious-positivity-of-amplituhedron.html
friday, january 02, 2015 ... Français/Deutsch/Español/Česky/Japanese/Related posts from blogosphere Mysterious positivity of the Amplituhedron Some comments on papers by Susskind; and Arkani-Hamed et al. (twice) So far, the latest arXiv preprints emerged on December 31st. The paper arXiv:1501.00001 (with the new redundant zero) should be out on Monday. On the Sylvester day (for Yankees: 1/2 of Europe plus Israel uses this name for New Year's Eve), three hep-th papers were authored or co-authored by very famous physicists. One was by Nima, another one was by Arkani, and the third one was... by Susskind. ;-) Leonard Susskind wrote an essay about the ER-EPR (worhhole-entanglement) correspondence and especially about the interpretation of the GHZ states and quantum teleportation within the paradigm started by Maldacena and Susskind. It's fun to read Lenny's papers but I found the issues in this new paper sort of obvious, so I don't think that there's something new for me to learn here. Susskind tries to solve some "potential paradoxes" involving entanglement and measurements by different observers in different orders that could lead to inconsistencies if ER-EPR is assumed to hold as well. I find it trivial to see – or trivial to prove – that no such inconsistencies can possibly exist. At the end, the ER-EPR correspondence is just assigning a new, wormhole-like interpretation to some special states in the Hilbert space of two or numerous black holes (or other objects). Because there is no inconsistency in quantum mechanics, there can't be any inconsistency in the same quantum mechanics presented along with some new names (or illustrations) for some of the basis vectors in the Hilbert space. The real point is that the different "labels" for the different bases of the Hilbert space can't be in conflict with each other because they provide us with complementary, inequivalent, but mutually not contradicting descriptions of the same thing. In principle, we may assume that we analyze a Hilbert space of two black holes whose microstates may be entangled in any way; or one Einstein-Rosen bridge whose throat may be filled with some arbitrarily entangled matter. There is no way to fully decide which description – which topology – is the right one. Whether the two black holes are connected by a bridge may only be found by the agreement in the infalling observers' observations and the same agreement – correlation – may be guaranteed by entanglement. Moreover, no GR-based observations in the shared black hole interiors may influence other observations by the outside observers because the future of the observers inside ends up in the singularity. The guaranteed death of the people inside the black holes and bridges reduces or eliminates the potential for new contradictions. That's also why the topological invariants of the spacetime – the number of bridges between black holes, for example – aren't well-defined Hermitian operators (i.e. observables) on the Hilbert space. You must start your description by deciding about your background and its topology, and any physical phenomena may be described within the language you have chosen. I have stated this principle of mine many times and right now, I decided to coin a new term for this principle, background indifference. It may sound similar to "background independence" but the content is very different and, to some extent, the opposite thing. The background independence – as used by various, often not really credible, quantum gravity people – means that the theory doesn't assume any background and it creates all backgrounds on equal footings as solutions. These people often fail to see that the background independence is often just a question of the formalism, not a property of the theory, and their proposed theories usually refuse to provide us with any realistic, nearly flat, backgrounds which is why "background independence" is just a way to mask this fatal flaw and sell it as a virtue. On the other hand, "background indifference" says that even if the Hilbert space and the set of possible phenomena are fixed, you may choose more or less any background you want, and the pre-determined physical phenomena may be expressed using this background, anyway. Any background may be viewed as an excitation of another background – even if their topology seem to be different! The only difference between several backgrounds is that one of them is more "useful" – that it requires less complicated excitations to describe the relevant states. A way to explain why "background independence" and "background indifference" are morally opposite to each other is to say that "background independence" (or some champions of the term as a matter of dogma) want you to feel guilty whenever you choose a specific background to expand around, in order to describe the physical phenomena. On the other hand, "background indifference" wants you to feel no guilt at all. You are not only allowed to choose a background to describe phenomena – but any choice is just good in principle! |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 21st, 2019 at 6:18pm
DEEP DIVE HERE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIc0-PjbOkA David Wilcock Groudbreaking Lecture On Consciousness Geometry and Ascention start @ 1:30:00 |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Frank on Nov 21st, 2019 at 9:26pm |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Yadda on Nov 21st, 2019 at 9:45pm Yes, its all mind blowingly BIG ! Muse - Supermassive Black Hole https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pta-gf6JaHQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pta-gf6JaHQ |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 23rd, 2019 at 1:58pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rZspAmawIpc
Wal Thornhill: Big Bang – Time to Wipe the Chalkboard Clean | Space News |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 24th, 2019 at 11:03pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgNSaMzycCI
Deadly Landslide, Flood, Sun & Consciousness | S0 News Nov.24.2019 Suspicious0bservers 436K subscribers Daily Sun, Earth and Science News Need to Catch Up? CLIMATE FORCING: https://youtu.be/rEWoPzaDmOA CLIMATE FORCING [Short]: https://youtu.be/tul07hx8V8w PLASMA COSMOLOGY: https://youtu.be/E4pWZGBpWP0 PLASMA COSMOLOGY [Short]: https://youtu.be/G48V-Fmh4uc COSMIC DISASTER: https://youtu.be/B_zfMyzXqfI Lots more on our channel page, just click our name! Our Websites: https://www.Suspicious0bservers.org https://www.SpaceWeatherNews.com https://www.QuakeWatch.net https://www.ObservatoryProject.com https://www.MagneticReversal.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/observatoryp... Alerts on Twitter: https://twitter.com/TheRealS0s Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/mobileobser... Wanted- Earthquake Forecasters: https://youtu.be/l1iGTd84oys Earthquake Forecasting Contest: https://youtu.be/Fsa_4jAyQsI Contest Information: http://www.quakewatch.net/contest Today's Featured Links: Mystery Deep Conductivity: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/1... LF MF and Chromosome Break Repair: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/... Bad Extreme Storm Probability Study: https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.c... NGC 3749: https://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/go... Consciousness & Magnetic Fields: https://jcer.com/index.php/jcj/articl... Cosmic Rays & Cognition: https://www.rrjournal.org/doi/abs/10.... ELF & Aggression: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/art... Music by NEMES1S Links for the News: TY WindMap: https://www.windy.com Earth WindMap: http://earth.nullschool.net SDO: http://sdo.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/ Helioviewer: http://www.helioviewer.org/ SOHO: https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/data/The... STEREO: http://stereo.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/i... GOES Satellites: http://rammb.cira.colostate.edu/ramsd... Earthquakes: https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquak... RSOE: http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php suspicious observers suspicious0bservers Category News & Politics |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Bobby. on Nov 25th, 2019 at 4:45am
Dr Becky Smethurst is an astrophysicist researching galaxies and supermassive black holes at Christ Church at the University of Oxford.
14:22 - A crisis in cosmology - the shape, age and content of the Universe - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnn_5YMpo3Q The current crisis in Cosmology - it just got a lot worse | Night Sky News November 2019 |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 26th, 2019 at 9:58am Bobby. wrote on Nov 25th, 2019 at 4:45am:
this new evidence ties into your report Brave Knight ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ewn2Wavf920 Giant Galaxy Forms After Trio of Star Systems SMASH Into Each Other Astronomers studying one of the most peculiarly-shaped galaxies ever discovered say they have found one more supermassive black hole at its core than previously known, indicating that three star systems collided. The discovery is being hailed as a world-first. Galaxy NGC 6240 is described by the European Space Agency as “butterfly- or lobster-shaped” and sits relatively close to our Milky Way (cosmically speaking) at a distance of about 400 million lightyears. https://www.rt.com/news/474299-three-galaxies-merging-ngc6240/ |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 28th, 2019 at 6:31am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aKQ_2QZHv4
VY Canis Majoris' Inevitable Dramatic Demise as a Supernova |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 28th, 2019 at 6:54am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqIxXyXHCvs
Solar Magnetism Update | Cycle 25 Forecast Suspicious0bservers 437K subscribers Sun, Earth and Science News - Every Day Solar cycle 25 is coming soon. Speculation about grand solar minimum being upon us are false, and indeed there is at least a decade left until its arrival. This next cycle should be much like cycle 24, which is ending now. Category News & Politics |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 28th, 2019 at 6:56am
https://geocenter.info/en/monitoring/schumann
Schumann Resonances Figure 1 - Dependence of factor of merit of the Schumann resonance on the local time. Figure 2 - Dependence of amplitudes of the Schumann resonance in Hertz on the local time. Figure 3 - Schumann Resonances Figure 4 - Dependence of frequencies of the Schumann resonance in hertz on the local time. Local time is expressed in hours of Tomsk summer standard time (TSST). TSST = UTC + 7 hours. |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 28th, 2019 at 9:10am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JduixNoUDBc
Peter Maxwell Slattery [Part 1]: Light Beings, Solar Flash & Disclosure Down Under | Edge of Wonder |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 30th, 2019 at 8:11am
https://www.universetoday.com/144173/a-fifth-fundamental-force-could-really-exist-but-we-havent-found-it-yet/
A Fifth Fundamental Force Could Really Exist, But We Haven’t Found It Yet NOVEMBER 26, 2019 BY BRIAN KOBERLEIN The universe is governed by four fundamental forces: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. These forces drive the motion and behavior of everything we see around us. At least that’s what we think. But over the past several years there’s been increasing evidence of a fifth fundamental force. New research hasn’t discovered this fifth force, but it does show that we still don’t fully understand these cosmic forces. The fundamental forces are a part of the standard model of particle physics. This model describes all the various quantum particles we observe, such as electrons, protons, antimatter, and such. Quarks, neutrinos and the Higgs boson are all part of the model. The term “force” in the model is a bit of a misnomer. In the standard model, each force is the result of a type of carrier boson. Photons are the carrier boson for electromagnetism. Gluons are the carrier bosons for the strong, and bosons known as W and Z are for the weak. Gravity isn’t technically part of the standard model, but it’s assumed that quantum gravity has a boson known as the graviton. We still don’t fully understand quantum gravity, but one idea is that gravity can be united with the standard model to produce a grand unified theory (GUT). Every particle we’ve ever discovered is a part of the standard model. The behavior of these particles matches the model extremely accurately. We have looked for particles beyond the standard model, but so far we have never found any. The standard model is a triumph of scientific understanding. It is the pinnacle of quantum physics. But we’ve started to learn it has some serious problems. Particles and interaction bosons of the standard model. Credit: Particle Data Group To begin with, we now know the standard model can’t combine with gravity in the way that we thought. In the standard model, the fundamental forces “unify” at higher energy levels. Electromagnetism and the weak combine into the electroweak, and the electroweak unifies with the strong to become the electronuclear force. At extremely high energies the electronuclear and gravitational forces should unify. Experiments in particle physics have shown that the unification energies don’t match up. Observations of galaxies show the distribution of dark matter. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland/D.Harvey & NASA/CXC/Durham Univ/R.Massey; Optical & Lensing Map: NASA, ESA, D. Harvey (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland) and R. Massey (Durham University, UK) More problematic is the issue of dark matter. Dark matter was first proposed to explain why stars and gas on the outer edge of a galaxy move faster than predicted by gravity. Either our theory of gravity is somehow wrong, or there must be some invisible (dark) mass in galaxies. Over the past fifty years, the evidence for dark matter has gotten really strong. We’ve observed how dark matter clusters galaxies together, how it is distributed within particular galaxies, and how it behaves. We know it doesn’t interact strongly with regular matter or itself, and it makes up the majority of mass in most galaxies. But there is no particle in the standard model that could make up dark matter. It’s possible that dark matter could be made of something such as small black holes, but astronomical data doesn’t really support that idea. Dark matter is most likely made of some yet undiscovered particle, one the standard model doesn’t predict. We don’t understand most of the universe. Credit: Chandra X-ray Observatory Then there is dark energy. Detailed observations of distant galaxies show that the universe is expanding at an ever-increasing rate. There seems to be some kind of energy driving this process, and we don’t understand how. It could be that this acceleration is the result of the structure of space and time, a kind of cosmological constant that causes the universe to expand. It could be that this is driven by some new force yet to be discovered. Whatever dark energy is, it makes up more than two-thirds of the universe. All of this points to the fact that the standard model is, at best, incomplete. There are things we are fundamentally missing in the way the universe works. Lots of ideas have been proposed to fix the standard model, from supersymmetry to yet undiscovered quarks, but one idea is that there is a fifth fundamental force. This force would have its own carrier boson(s) as well as new particles beyond the ones we’ve discovered. This fifth force would also interact with the particles we have observed in subtle ways that contradict the standard model. This brings us to a new paper claiming to have evidence of such an interaction. |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 7th, 2019 at 12:20pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgwKr58WG-s
Gravity vs Plasma – Matter, Charge and Conjecture | Space News |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Yadda on Dec 7th, 2019 at 4:53pm Quote:
I keep expecting to see information, in a post, in this thread, attributed to Prof. Sheldon Cooper. [wink to LIGHT] |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Bobby. on Dec 7th, 2019 at 5:08pm http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MA7jLKnQ4c 10 Things About the Universe That we may Never Understand 1,494,114 views Mar 17, 2019 |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by .JaSin. on Dec 7th, 2019 at 8:22pm
Well Mr Light Show.
Let me introduce you to Vonda and her novel 'Superluminal' which was written awhile back. She's already covered this. ;) ...there's even a 7th ;) 51nZG07KSBL__SL300_.jpg (12 KB | 16
) |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by .JaSin. on Dec 7th, 2019 at 8:23pm
Can you see the 'ripple' effect? ;)
|
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 8th, 2019 at 8:37pm
Interesting !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3iXNX-hAD4 Researchers Discover Plants Make Ultrasonic Screams When Stressed or Hurt |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 9th, 2019 at 9:44pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4JfjisAUb4
Warning : (Three) Interplanetary Shockwaves Earthbound ! |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by Frank on Dec 9th, 2019 at 9:47pm
Is the earth still flat?
|
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 11th, 2019 at 9:36am Frank wrote on Dec 9th, 2019 at 9:47pm:
depends how you look at it , and where you are looking from .. lets continue , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUA7XS0TvA Thunderbolts of the Gods | Official Movie |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 11th, 2019 at 6:30pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BL0z9W7iDY
'Atomology' (Etymology) The Original Universal Language: MIAMI 7th Dec: Part FOUR |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Dec 18th, 2019 at 12:00pm
https://youtu.be/xctvl0xvJhw
Metal Tablets could Prove to Change Religion as We Know It |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Jan 1st, 2020 at 10:08am
This happened last Decade while you were watching tell a lie vision
and getting drunk mayhaps .. wakey wakey https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DI7XJ-iGshY Telescope Update: The First “Quantum Teleportation” Between Two Computer Chips Took Place https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-manage-quantum-teleportation-between-computer-chips-for-the-first-time Physicists Just Achieved The First-Ever Quantum Teleportation Between Computer Chips DAVID NIELD31 DEC 2019 As 2019 winds to a close, the journey towards fully realised quantum computing continues: physicists have been able to demonstrate quantum teleportation between two computer chips for the first time. Put simply, this breakthrough means that information was passed between the chips not by physical electronic connections, but through quantum entanglement – by linking two particles across a gap using the principles of quantum physics. We don't yet understand everything about quantum entanglement (it's the same phenomenon Albert Einstein famously called "spooky action"), but being able to use it to send information between computer chips is significant, even if so far we're confined to a tightly controlled lab environment. "We were able to demonstrate a high-quality entanglement link across two chips in the lab, where photons on either chip share a single quantum state," explains quantum physicist Dan Llewellyn from the University of Bristol in the UK. "Each chip was then fully programmed to perform a range of demonstrations which utilise the entanglement." Hypothetically, quantum entanglement can work over any distance. Two particles get inextricably linked together, which means looking at one tells us something about the other, wherever it is (in this case, on a separate computer chip). To achieve their result, the team generated pairs of entangled photons, encoding quantum information in a way that ensured low levels of interference and high levels of accuracy. Up to four qubits – the quantum equivalent of classical computing bits – were linked together. "The flagship demonstration was a two-chip teleportation experiment, whereby the individual quantum state of a particle is transmitted across the two chips after a quantum measurement is performed," says Llewellyn. "This measurement utilises the strange behaviour of quantum physics, which simultaneously collapses the entanglement link and transfers the particle state to another particle already on the receiver chip." The researchers were then able to run experiments in which the fidelity reached 91 percent – as in, almost all the information was accurately transmitted and logged. Scientists are learning more and more about how quantum entanglement works, but for now it's very hard to control. It's not something you can install inside a laptop: you need a lot of bulky, expensive scientific equipment to get it working. But the hope is that advances in the lab, such as this one, might one day lead to advances in computing that everyone can take advantage of – super-powerful processing power and a next-level internet with built-in hacking protections. The low data loss and high stability of the teleportation, as well as the high level of control that the scientists were able to get over their experiments, are all promising signs in terms of follow-up research. It's also a useful study for efforts to get quantum physics working with the silicon chip (Si-chip) tech used in today's computers, and the complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) techniques used to make those chips. "In the future, a single Si-chip integration of quantum photonic devices and classical electronic controls will open the door for fully chip-based CMOS-compatible quantum communication and information processing networks," says quantum physicist Jianwei Wang, from Peking University in China. The research has been published in Nature Physics. |
|
Title: Re: Science Discovers The Universe Post by it_is_the_light on Jan 2nd, 2020 at 8:06pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3-f-pj2RhIo
Quadrantids: 2020's First Major Meteor Shower will Light Up Night Skies |
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |