https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/coup-fail-schiff-star-witness-fiona-hill-obliterates-hillary-funded-phony-russia-dossier-in-testimony/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=weekend

COUP FAIL: Schiff Star Witness Fiona Hill Obliterates Hillary-Funded Phony Russia Dossier in Testimony

by Cristina Laila November 9, 2019 158 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/IMG_7746-1-600x278.jpg
Fiona Hill arrives on Capitol Hill

Schiff’s star witness Fiona Hill pretty much obliterated the Hillary-funded phony Russia dossier during her October congressional testimony.

Corrupt and Compulsive Liar Adam Schiff is attempting to unseat the President of the United States using characters like Fiona Hill.


The list of her connections to corrupt players in the Deep State is endless.

As we previously mentioned Roger Stone outed Fiona Hill in 2017 as a Deep State spy in the White House under then NSA Advisor General H. R. McMaster.

Fiona Hill is also connected to George Soros. Imagine our shock.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/fiona-hill-open-society-600x204.jpg
Adam Schiff and the Democrats brought in Fiona Hill, a former White House advisor and expert on Russia who resigned in July, to speak for 11 hours in a recent Deep State interview.


Hill had ZERO knowledge of the call President Trump had with the Ukrainian President, and only heard rumors. Democrats don’t care. They want to impeach Trump on rumors.

What the Deep State traitors weren’t expecting was for Fiona Hill to completely obliterate the phony Russia dossier that Hillary Clinton and her camp paid millions of dollars for in order to spy on Donald Trump.

The FBI also used the phony dossier to obtain a FISA warrant and three FISA renewals on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.

Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.”

“Because if you also think about it, the Russians would have an ax to grind against him [Steele] given the job that he had previously. And if he started going back through his old contacts and asking about, that would be a perfect opportunity for people to feed some kind of misinformation,” Hill told Congress.

“I almost fell over when I discovered that he was doing this report,” Hill said when she found out Steele compiled the Russia dossier from a series of memos.

“Christopher Steele going out and looking for information. He’s obviously out there soliciting information,” she added. “What a great opportunity to, basically, you know, present him with information that he’s looking for that can be couched some truth and some disinformation.”

Read more here.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/08/fiona-hill-steele-dossier-disinformation/


Quote:

Chuck Ross ‏ Verified account @ChuckRossDC Follow Follow @ChuckRossDC More ICYMI: Fiona Hill basically obliterated the Steele dossier in congressional deposition. She said: -Steele was likely victim of Russian disinfo -Steele would "constantly try to drum up business." -Fusion GPS/Dems should not have hired Steele

https://i.imgflip.com/3ftzwp.jpg

https://twitter.com/ChuckRossDC/status/1193206988446076928

Council on Foreign Relations - 2003 to present

The ancestral home of the swamp. Bless their cotton socks.

Lock n load.  Tic Tok.

Funny that you would want any part of her testimony after the way that she tore Mr Trump a new one and obliterated the assertions of the republican's lawyer's questions.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/matt-gaetz-eric-swalwell-trump-russia-doomsday-prediction/

Matt Gaetz Is ‘Still Waiting’ For Eric Swalwell’s Trump-Russia ‘Doomsday Prediction’ To Pan Out

https://youtu.be/xyFnZJXBsn4

Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz said Monday that he wasn’t really sure why anyone would take “doomsday predictions” from Democratic California Rep. Eric Swalwell seriously.

Gaetz made the comments during a segment of “The Story” with Martha MacCallum as House Democrats prepared for the first public hearings in the push to impeach President Donald Trump.

MacCallum began the segment with a recent video clip of Swalwell saying that he believed there was evidence of what he called an “extortion scheme.” “We have enough evidence from the depositions that we’ve done to warrant bringing this forward,” he said.

MacCallum went on to point out that the process was just beginning and already Swalwell seemed convinced of the outcome.

“I like Congressman Swalwell a lot,” Gaetz said, referring to the California politician as a “talented guy.”

But then Gaetz continued, “I’m still waiting for Eric Swalwell’s last doomsday predictions regarding this administration to come true. I don’t know how anyone takes him seriously when he talks about the end of the presidency being right around the corner. He said precisely the same thing in the Russian investigation.”

Gaetz then offered his unsolicited advice to Democrats, suggesting that they “bench the Schiff-Swalwell team” going into the public hearings. “Hand us over to people on the more moderate side,” he said. “Have them take a look at it with a little more objectivity, because it’s just hard to believe these folks who gave us these outrageous claims before.”

Quote:

"Because if you also think about it, the Russians would have an ax to grind against him [Steele] given the job that he had previously. And if he started going back through his old contacts and asking about, that would be a perfect opportunity for people to feed some kind of misinformation,” Hill told Congress.

How does this prove thus, dear one?

Do you like to be called sir or ma'am?

so in the end, after the mountains of words, the Steele dossier has once again been proven correct.

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 15^th, 2019 at 4:20pm:

so in the end, after the mountains of words, the Steele dossier has once again been proven correct.

Classic Dead End! 

Complete inversion of the truth! ;D ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFvvncFv4G0

Hannity: Adam Schiff was in rare form during hearings

Richdude wrote on Nov 17^th, 2019 at 2:45am:

longweekend58 wrote on Nov 15th, 2019 at 4:20pm: so in the end, after the mountains of words, the Steele dossier has once again been proven correct. Classic Dead End!  Complete inversion of the truth! ;D ;D

Speaking of, would you care to reply to some of the threads you abandoned when it was shown your version of "the truth" was factually wrong?

I can list the threads if you want, just let me know, unless you're going to abandon this one too?

ProudKangaroo wrote on Nov 17^th, 2019 at 7:51am:

Richdude wrote on Nov 17th, 2019 at 2:45am: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 15th, 2019 at 4:20pm: so in the end, after the mountains of words, the Steele dossier has once again been proven correct. Classic Dead End!  Complete inversion of the truth! ;D ;D Speaking of, would you care to reply to some of the threads you abandoned when it was shown your version of "the truth" was factually wrong? I can list the threads if you want, just let me know, unless you're going to abandon this one too?

Why are you supporting the Dead One? His statements are obviously absurd - so why do so?

You paid trolls are ridiculous!

Richdude wrote on Nov 17^th, 2019 at 1:57pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Nov 17th, 2019 at 7:51am: Richdude wrote on Nov 17th, 2019 at 2:45am: longweekend58 wrote on Nov 15th, 2019 at 4:20pm: so in the end, after the mountains of words, the Steele dossier has once again been proven correct. Classic Dead End!  Complete inversion of the truth! ;D ;D Speaking of, would you care to reply to some of the threads you abandoned when it was shown your version of "the truth" was factually wrong? I can list the threads if you want, just let me know, unless you're going to abandon this one too? Why are you supporting the Dead One? His statements are obviously absurd - so why do so? You paid trolls are ridiculous!

Supporting "dead one"?  I support the truth.

I'm asking if you care about the truth so much as you now claim, would you like to continue that into some of the questions being asked of you from threads you've abandoned because, it would seem, you couldn't handle the truth at the time?

With this new you who is all about the truth, this is a great chance for you to show us that in action.

I'll leave the ball in your court, it's up to you to show us if you care about the truth or not.

here is some truth to support ..

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/huge-after-removing-ukrainian-prosecutor-shokin-obamas-state-department-plotted-with-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-in-white-house-then-pushed-steele-dossier-to-fbi/

HUGE! After Removing Ukrainian Prosecutor Shokin, Obama’s State Department Plotted with Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in White House – Then Pushed Steele Dossier to FBI

by Joe Hoft November 17, 2019 244 Comments

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Kerry-and-Nuland-600x404.jpg

The Obama Administration coerced the Ukrainian government into removing the prosecutor investigating Ukrainian firm Burisma and its ties to Obama’s Vice President Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry.  Next they plotted with whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in the White House and then pushed the Steele dossier to the FBI.

We know that Obama State Department Victoria Nuland was involved in numerous activities in the Obama White House while working for John Kerry.  Nuland first was noted when she was caught lying to reporters about Obama’s Benghazi talking points.  Nuland then came to light in 2014 when she was caught on tape saying “F**k the EU”.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/02/caught-on-tape-state-dept-official-victoria-nuland-says-fck-the-eu-on-call-video/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/busted-state-department-spokeswoman-victoria-nuland-deliberately-lied-to-reporters-about-benghazi-talking-points-video/

https://youtu.be/MSxaa-67yGMhttps://youtu.be/YyAUxaqh2Vs

We also know that Obama’s State and Justice Departments assisted billionaire and Democrat donor George Soros in an attempt to control Ukraine’s oil and gas industry.

In late 2015 Nuland was connected to a coup that the Deep State was involved in.  Obama officials including Nuland and the Ukrainian Ambassador discussed toppling the Ukrainian Government and replacing officials, with then VP Joe Biden’s approval.

The Epoch Times had an excellent piece on this time period in the Obama White House –

State Department Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland worked with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt in late 2015 to create a plan to force the firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, according to Kent. Nuland was also among a network of Obama administration officials involved in the distribution and recirculation of the infamous Steele dossier, the document used by the FBI to secure a maximally intrusive spy warrant to surveil a Trump-campaign associate.

“My understanding is that the conversations that were near-daily between Ambassador Pyatt and Toria Nuland regarding what to do on the way forward then included pitching the office of the Vice President to push President Poroshenko to remove Shokin,” Kent told lawmakers on Oct. 15.

Biden ultimately carried out Nuland’s plan during a visit to Ukraine in December 2015 and has since bragged, on at least two occasions, about forcing Shokin’s firing by threatening to cut off the loan guarantees. At the time Biden exerted pressure on Ukraine, Shokin was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas giant that was paying Biden’s son Hunter Biden to serve on its board of directors. The Ukrainian president asked for Shokin’s resignation two months after Biden’s overture. The Ukrainian Parliament approved the resignation on March 29, 2016.

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 15^th, 2019 at 9:38am:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/matt-gaetz-eric-swalwell-trump-russia-doomsday-prediction/ Matt Gaetz Is ‘Still Waiting’ For Eric Swalwell’s Trump-Russia ‘Doomsday Prediction’ To Pan Out https://youtu.be/xyFnZJXBsn4 Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz said Monday that he wasn’t really sure why anyone would take “doomsday predictions” from Democratic California Rep. Eric Swalwell seriously. Gaetz made the comments during a segment of “The Story” with Martha MacCallum as House Democrats prepared for the first public hearings in the push to impeach President Donald Trump. MacCallum began the segment with a recent video clip of Swalwell saying that he believed there was evidence of what he called an “extortion scheme.” “We have enough evidence from the depositions that we’ve done to warrant bringing this forward,” he said. MacCallum went on to point out that the process was just beginning and already Swalwell seemed convinced of the outcome. “I like Congressman Swalwell a lot,” Gaetz said, referring to the California politician as a “talented guy.” But then Gaetz continued, “I’m still waiting for Eric Swalwell’s last doomsday predictions regarding this administration to come true. I don’t know how anyone takes him seriously when he talks about the end of the presidency being right around the corner. He said precisely the same thing in the Russian investigation.” Gaetz then offered his unsolicited advice to Democrats, suggesting that they “bench the Schiff-Swalwell team” going into the public hearings. “Hand us over to people on the more moderate side,” he said. “Have them take a look at it with a little more objectivity, because it’s just hard to believe these folks who gave us these outrageous claims before.”

They are all the same players all connect to the same Jerk Circle since Trumps inauguration.

But here's the thing.

The Forum Liberals continue to fall/believe/don't care,  for these lies and Hoaxes.

they are level 9 TDS  :D :D :D and "HOPE" for every new lie to get rid of Trump because they have already given up on the 2020 election.

Trump will smash them.

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 18^th, 2019 at 6:32am:

here is some truth to support .. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/huge-after-removing-ukrainian-prosecutor-shokin-obamas-state-department-plotted-with-whistleblower-eric-ciaramella-in-white-house-then-pushed-steele-dossier-to-fbi/ HUGE! After Removing Ukrainian Prosecutor Shokin, Obama’s State Department Plotted with Whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in White House – Then Pushed Steele Dossier to FBI by Joe Hoft November 17, 2019 244 Comments https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Kerry-and-Nuland-600x404.jpg The Obama Administration coerced the Ukrainian government into removing the prosecutor investigating Ukrainian firm Burisma and its ties to Obama’s Vice President Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry.  Next they plotted with whistleblower Eric Ciaramella in the White House and then pushed the Steele dossier to the FBI. We know that Obama State Department Victoria Nuland was involved in numerous activities in the Obama White House while working for John Kerry.  Nuland first was noted when she was caught lying to reporters about Obama’s Benghazi talking points.  Nuland then came to light in 2014 when she was caught on tape saying “F**k the EU”. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/02/caught-on-tape-state-dept-official-victoria-nuland-says-fck-the-eu-on-call-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/05/busted-state-department-spokeswoman-victoria-nuland-deliberately-lied-to-reporters-about-benghazi-talking-points-video/ https://youtu.be/MSxaa-67yGMhttps://youtu.be/YyAUxaqh2Vs We also know that Obama’s State and Justice Departments assisted billionaire and Democrat donor George Soros in an attempt to control Ukraine’s oil and gas industry. In late 2015 Nuland was connected to a coup that the Deep State was involved in.  Obama officials including Nuland and the Ukrainian Ambassador discussed toppling the Ukrainian Government and replacing officials, with then VP Joe Biden’s approval. The Epoch Times had an excellent piece on this time period in the Obama White House – State Department Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland worked with U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt in late 2015 to create a plan to force the firing of Ukrainian Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin, according to Kent. Nuland was also among a network of Obama administration officials involved in the distribution and recirculation of the infamous Steele dossier, the document used by the FBI to secure a maximally intrusive spy warrant to surveil a Trump-campaign associate. “My understanding is that the conversations that were near-daily between Ambassador Pyatt and Toria Nuland regarding what to do on the way forward then included pitching the office of the Vice President to push President Poroshenko to remove Shokin,” Kent told lawmakers on Oct. 15. Biden ultimately carried out Nuland’s plan during a visit to Ukraine in December 2015 and has since bragged, on at least two occasions, about forcing Shokin’s firing by threatening to cut off the loan guarantees. At the time Biden exerted pressure on Ukraine, Shokin was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas giant that was paying Biden’s son Hunter Biden to serve on its board of directors. The Ukrainian president asked for Shokin’s resignation two months after Biden’s overture. The Ukrainian Parliament approved the resignation on March 29, 2016.

I don't know how Liberals like KangaNong, Pudddleduck, Weak-End et al can stand by these international criminals - Biden's, Pelosi's, Hussein's, Kerry's etc etc etc the entire upper echelon of the Democrat Party.

They are international war criminals stealing an impoverished counties wealth and leaving them to starve to death.

think about that for a minute.  :-/

Filling your bank account while people die of starvation and misery  :-/

These criminals need to be handed over to the international war crimes tribunal.

https://www.puppetstringnews.com/blog/fbi-official-under-criminal-investigation-for-manipulating-russia-hoax-documents

FBI official under criminal investigation for manipulating Russia hoax documents


11/21/2019

https://www.puppetstringnews.com/uploads/7/2/8/4/72845613/download-10_73_orig.jpg

           dailycaller reports: The Justice Department is investigating an FBI official for allegedly altering a document as part of the Trump-Russia probe, according to an explosive report. CNN reported that the altered document was recovered as part of the Justice Department inspector general’s investigation into the FBI’s surveillance activities against Carter Page, a former Trump campaign adviser. The outlet cited several people briefed on the matter. Michael Horowitz, the inspector general, has turned the evidence over to John Durham, the U.S. attorney who was tapped earlier in 2019 to investigate the origins of the Russia investigation. Horowitz told Congress on Thursday that he plans to release a report of his investigation Dec. 9.
​                                  It really had to be a difficult decision for CNN to report that an FBI official is under criminal investigation for manipulating Russia probe documents, because this may be key into discovering the truth the Russia/Trump probe was a hoax. The information of an FBI official being under investigation for manipulating Trump/Russia probe documents...Just happens to come on the announcement that the IG FISA abuse report will drop on December 9th with IG Horowitz testifying on December 11th.
​                                    A main detail in this development that is missing is the name of this FBI official who is being criminally investigated, so this could point to this FBI official under criminal investigation for the following has been removed from the FBI already under President Trump. The news of an FBI official or former FBI official being criminally investigated for the following, may just point out how big of a hoax the Russia probe was...It would be epic if this was Mueller.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/21/fbi-investigation-alter-russia-documents/?utm_medium=push&utm_source=daily_caller&utm_campaign=push

https://thefederalist.com/2019/12/09/ig-report-fbi-doctored-evidence-to-falsely-paint-carter-page-as-russian-spy/

https://i.imgflip.com/3iy0qx.jpg

IG Report: FBI Doctored Evidence To Falsely Paint Carter Page As Russian Spy

The Department of Justice's inspector general found that a top FBI lawyer blatantly doctored evidence to falsely smear Carter Page as a Russian spy.

DECEMBER 9, 2019 By Sean Davis and Mollie Hemingway
A wide-ranging investigation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general (IG) found that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) deliberately doctored evidence it presented to the nation’s top spy court in order to gain authority to spy on a key Trump affiliate.

The 476-page report from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz found that the FBI falsely claimed to the FISA Court not only that Carter Page was a Russian agent, but also falsely claimed that an unnamed intelligence agency had told the FBI that Page was “not a source” in their efforts to surveil and curtail Russian intelligence efforts.

Page, who had previously been an informant and witness for the United States in a federal espionage case against a Russian intelligence official, was targeted by the Obama FBI as a Russian spy helping Putin to steal the election from Hillary Clinton in 2016. According to the IG report, before the FBI and DOJ went to the FISA Court to apply for a warrant to spy on Page, an unnamed U.S. intelligence agency had told the FBI that Carter Page had previously assisted that agency’s efforts against Russian spies. Although exculpatory information about potential spy targets is required in spy warrant applications, Obama’s FBI and DOJ deliberately withheld that information from the spy court in order to paint Page in the worst possible light.

The FBI’s malfeasance in the matter did not stop there. Ahead of an application to renew the spy warrant in 2017, a top FBI lawyer doctored evidence from the unnamed agency which confirmed that contrary to FBI claims that he was a Russian spy, Page had in fact assisted the United States in its efforts to counter Russian operations. An e-mail from the agency that clearly stated Page was “a source” for them was doctored by Kevin Clinesmith, a top FBI national security lawyer, to give the opposite impression to the federal spy court.

“The [Office of General Counsel] Attorney altered and sent the e-mail to a [supervisory special agent], who thereafter relied on it to swear out the third FISA application,” the IG report notes. Upon learning that a top FBI lawyer doctored evidence against a former Trump campaign affiliate to justify spying on him, the IG referred the attorney to DOJ for criminal prosecution.

Text messages from that same lawyer after the 2016 election revealed that he was an anti-Trump activist. “Viva la Resistance!” he texted on November 22, 2016, while in the midst of investigating Trump. He would later be terminated from the Mueller probe for conduct which a previous IG report said “brought discredit” to the FBI. Of FBI documents he approved authorizing spying on Trump campaign, Clinesmith wrote “[M]y god damned name is all over the legal documents investigating his staff.”

“[W]ho knows if that breaks to him what he is going to do,” Clinesmith continued, apparently worried about the ramifications of his illicit behavior against the Trump campaign. It is unclear whether he doctored evidence against Trump to protect his own career and reputation or simply because of anti-Trump animus. At the time, Clinesmith worked under James Baker, the FBI General Counsel who was a close confidant of fired former director James Comey. Baker was one of a slew of former deputies who resigned or were fired as the Russia collusion hoax imploded.

In his report, the Horowitz referred Clinesmith to DOJ authorities for criminal prosecution. Spanning more than 476 pages, the report cited countless examples of corruption and deceit committed by employees throughout the FBI and Department of Justice related to the Trump-Russia probe, confirming that the investigation against Trump was unusually aggressive, politically tainted, and bore no fruit. Despite its claims about Page being a traitorous Russian spy, the former Trump foreign policy affiliate was never charged with any wrongdoing since there was no evidence that he was working for the Russians.

A subsequent investigation by Robert Mueller similarly found zero evidence of treasonous collusion with Russia by Trump or his campaign to steal the 2016 election.

https://nypost.com/2019/11/23/fbis-resistance-lawyer-under-fire-in-upcoming-watchdog-report/

https://i.imgflip.com/3iy19j.jpg

FBI’s ‘resistance’ lawyer under fire in upcoming watchdog report

The former FBI lawyer accused of altering crucial documents in the FBI’s investigation into the Trump campaign is the same official who praised “the Resistance” in an anti-Trump text message in 2016, according to reports.


Kevin Clinesmith, who worked for ousted FBI agent Peter Strzok in the Hillary Clinton email investigation and the Russia probe, made significant additions to an email that was included in an application to renew a surveillance order against Trump aide Carter Page, The New York Times reported.

Clinesmith, identified as “FBI Attorney 2,” also appeared in a 2018 Inspector General’s report as the author of a string of texts lamenting Trump’s election, according to the Daily Caller.

“I am so stressed about what I could have done differently,” he wrote Nov. 9, hours after Trump’s victory. “Viva la Resistance!” he texted on Nov. 22.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-aUws90xyo

Graham reacts to IG's report on FBI bias: This is a sad day




@ 3:49 " the Russian Dossier is NOT RELIABLE "

Evidence was NOT included as exculpatory evidence *

@ 18:00 " I do not fault anybody for looking into allegations like this , I do fault them for LYING and misrepresenting to the COURT  "

https://i.imgflip.com/3ixmw2.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/3ixt1f.jpg

Proven, was it? Not likely?


Quote:

Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.”

I think it's likely to be true, dear one. Would you care to prove otherwise?

Karnal wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 11:37am:

Proven, was it? Not likely? Quote: Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.” I think it's likely to be true, dear one. Would you care to prove otherwise?

many blessings beloved , and yet

it matters not what you believe to be true , for you have no clue upon who you even are ..

Arthur? Marthur ? you are Abu/Karnal the internet tranny and transgender bender.. so as you were dear one ,

fear not upon your confusions and each way gender identity crisis ..

just relax and enjoy the show , yet either way be at peace

namaste

╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

it_is_the_light wrote on Nov 15^th, 2019 at 9:38am:

https://dailycaller.com/2019/11/11/matt-gaetz-eric-swalwell-trump-russia-doomsday-prediction/ Matt Gaetz Is ‘Still Waiting’ For Eric Swalwell’s Trump-Russia ‘Doomsday Prediction’ To Pan Out https://youtu.be/xyFnZJXBsn4 Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz said Monday that he wasn’t really sure why anyone would take “doomsday predictions” from Democratic California Rep. Eric Swalwell seriously. Gaetz made the comments during a segment of “The Story” with Martha MacCallum as House Democrats prepared for the first public hearings in the push to impeach President Donald Trump. MacCallum began the segment with a recent video clip of Swalwell saying that he believed there was evidence of what he called an “extortion scheme.” “We have enough evidence from the depositions that we’ve done to warrant bringing this forward,” he said. MacCallum went on to point out that the process was just beginning and already Swalwell seemed convinced of the outcome. “I like Congressman Swalwell a lot,” Gaetz said, referring to the California politician as a “talented guy.” But then Gaetz continued, “I’m still waiting for Eric Swalwell’s last doomsday predictions regarding this administration to come true. I don’t know how anyone takes him seriously when he talks about the end of the presidency being right around the corner. He said precisely the same thing in the Russian investigation.” Gaetz then offered his unsolicited advice to Democrats, suggesting that they “bench the Schiff-Swalwell team” going into the public hearings. “Hand us over to people on the more moderate side,” he said. “Have them take a look at it with a little more objectivity, because it’s just hard to believe these folks who gave us these outrageous claims before.”

Didn’t Swalwell drop his guts on live TV?..

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 11:49am:

Karnal wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 11:37am: Proven, was it? Not likely? Quote: Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.” I think it's likely to be true, dear one. Would you care to prove otherwise? many blessings beloved , and yet it matters not what you believe to be true , for you have no clue upon who you even are .. Arthur? Marthur ? you are Abu/Karnal the internet tranny and transgender bender.. so as you were dear one , fear not upon your confusions and each way gender identity crisis .. just relax and enjoy the show , yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯

It is so, dear one. I relax, I enjoy, I Am both Arthur and Martha, and I Am at peace.

There is no crisis or confusion in one that I Am, beloved brother, but I'm curious.

What hast thou proven to these dear children here?

Karnal wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 2:02pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 11:49am: Karnal wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 11:37am: Proven, was it? Not likely? Quote: Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.” I think it's likely to be true, dear one. Would you care to prove otherwise? many blessings beloved , and yet it matters not what you believe to be true , for you have no clue upon who you even are .. Arthur? Marthur ? you are Abu/Karnal the internet tranny and transgender bender.. so as you were dear one , fear not upon your confusions and each way gender identity crisis .. just relax and enjoy the show , yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ It is so, dear one. I relax, I enjoy, I Am both Arthur and Martha, and I Am at peace. There is no crisis or confusion in one that I Am, beloved brother, but I'm curious. What hast thou proven to these dear children here?

that you are a self admitted gender bender and internet tranny

among many other things so relax maam ..

and be at peace

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 2:27pm:

Karnal wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 2:02pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 11:49am: Karnal wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 11:37am: Proven, was it? Not likely? Quote: Fiona Hill testified in October that former British spy and dossier author Christopher Steele was likely a victim of Russian disinformation and that he was desperate to “drum up business.” I think it's likely to be true, dear one. Would you care to prove otherwise? many blessings beloved , and yet it matters not what you believe to be true , for you have no clue upon who you even are .. Arthur? Marthur ? you are Abu/Karnal the internet tranny and transgender bender.. so as you were dear one , fear not upon your confusions and each way gender identity crisis .. just relax and enjoy the show , yet either way be at peace namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ It is so, dear one. I relax, I enjoy, I Am both Arthur and Martha, and I Am at peace. There is no crisis or confusion in one that I Am, beloved brother, but I'm curious. What hast thou proven to these dear children here? that youpro are a self admitted gender bender and internet tranny among many other things so relax maam .. and be at peace

Ah, dear one, but you refuse to answer thine own question:

Do you prefer sir or ma'am?

You also refuse to explain how a person's opinion that a certain agent was likely to be means he was proven to be, case closed.

Let us posit thus: I say your agent is likely to be one thing, and you another. Who is right? Who is credible? Who is proven?

The dear one who predicted Comey's indictment (in the next few days, a week at the most)? The world's split like a cell in 2012 (not all would notice this fact)? The arrest of Hillary, Obama, Joe Biden and even Mueller himself (BREAKING...)?

Or the beloved brother being who stands firm, points to facts and cries, Lo! Devil begone!

---

For those that cannot read ,

look here and facts will be explained unto thee @ 6:20

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiB7Syt0ug

Hannity: Deep state in deep legal jeaopardy


Steel was interviewed by John Durham and spilled the beans ..

the Dossier was " intelligence from an unreliable source " ( an ACTIVE Russian SPY !! )

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 7:50pm:

For those that cannot read , look here and facts will be explained unto thee @ 6:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiB7Syt0ug Hannity: Deep state in deep legal jeaopardy Steel was interviewed by John Durham and spilled the beans .. the Dossier was " intelligence from an unreliable source " ( an ACTIVE Russian SPY !! )

HANNITY?

Oh, dear one...

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3dIq4L_DAk

Comey says he didn’t know who funded Russia dossier


oopsie daisy ,

Comey caught Lying

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqaQlTC11E

Comey: Obama could not order wiretap alone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1egQoB6CIlI

Dispute erupts over which ex-DOJ officials pushed Steele dossier


oopsie daisy , someones lying  ;)

Dear one?

I'm curious. Do you really expect ones such as We Are to fall for Fox News DiSiNfOrMaTiOn?

Even you know it's fake. Why should your dear children fall for this?

Karnal wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:08pm:

Dear one? I'm curious. Do you really expect ones such as We Are to fall for Fox News DiSiNfOrMaTiOn? Even you know it's fake. Why should your dear children fall for this?

oh !

you know the answer beloved ??

who pushed the Fake Russian Dossier ? Comey or Brennan ?

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 7:50pm:

For those that cannot read , look here and facts will be explained unto thee @ 6:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiB7Syt0ug Hannity: Deep state in deep legal jeaopardy Steel was interviewed by John Durham and spilled the beans .. the Dossier was " intelligence from an unreliable source " ( an ACTIVE Russian SPY !! )

JUICY !!!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANB0pfmSLpg

James Comey's thought process on Moscow hotel room escapades


does Comey know where the Urine soaked checks are ??? lets listen !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xw0dV5f4zZw

James Comey on His Infamous Dinner with Trump and the Steele Dossier | The New Yorker

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:06pm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqaQlTC11E Comey: Obama could not order wiretap alone

Obama WOULD NOT order a wiretap alone. He was a former Harvard academic. His area was the Separation of Powers. His mandate as Prez was to overturn the executive regime set up by Bush/Cheney.

When Comey first approached Obama with the intel on the Russian hack, Obama's first response was "why are you telling me this?"

Obama didn't want to know. He was constantly worried about the appearance of conflicts of interest. If anything, this risk adversion defined his presidency.

Obama was a complete cleanskin, and you know it. The only thing you have on Obama, dear one, is his transvestite husband Michael.

Oh - and his tintedness.

Karnal wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:29pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 8:06pm: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WbqaQlTC11E Comey: Obama could not order wiretap alone Obama WOULD NOT order a wiretap alone. He was a former Harvard academic. His area was the Separation of Powers. His mandate as Prez was to overturn the executive regime set up by Bush/Cheney. When Comey first approached Obama with the intel on the Russian hack, Obama's first response was "why are you telling me this?" Obama didn't want to know. He was constantly worried about the appearance of conflicts of interest. If anything, this risk adversion defined his presidency. Obama was a complete cleanskin, and you know it. The only thing you have on Obama, dear one, is his transvestite husband Michael.

takes one to know one ..

all roads lead to Kenya

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:07pm:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1egQoB6CIlI Dispute erupts over which ex-DOJ officials pushed Steele dossier oopsie daisy , someones lying  ;)

Its fox news they are all lying.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/ig-report-confirms-brennan-lied-in-sworn-testimony-about-not-including-phony-dossier-in-ic-assessment-on-russian-interference/

IG Report Confirms Brennan Lied in SWORN Testimony About Not Including Phony Dossier in IC Assessment on Russian Interference


by Cristina Laila December 11, 2019

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/photojoiner_photo-20-600x338.jpeg
John Brennan

When is John Brennan going to jail for committing perjury?

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz released his 476-page report on FISA abuses this week then testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

The IG report confirmed former CIA Director John Brennan did indeed rely on the phony dossier for the ICA report on so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election.


John Brennan claimed in a May 2017 testimony under oath that Hillary’s phony dossier didn’t factor into the Intelligence Community’s Assessment report on Russian interference of the 2016 presidential election.

Brennan told Trey Gowdy during his testimony when asked if the CIA relied on the dossier, “No. Because we — we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was — it was not.”

Brennan then went on to repeatedly insist these claims to the public in various interviews with the media.


However, as The Federalist reported, on page 179 of the IG report, Comey told IG investigators that he remembered having numerous discussions with John Brennan where the former CIA Director said the dossier was “important” enough to include in the ICA — Comey confirmed that yes, the dossier was part of the “corpus of intelligence information” the agency had.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2019-12-09-at-12.37.50-PM-600x292.png

It’s important to note that former DNI chief James Clapper limited the IC report for review to only 3 agencies rather than send the report out to all 17 agencies for review. This way he was able to control what was put into the report.

In fact, Clapper left out the relevant agencies with expertise on Russia such as the DHS and the State Department’s intelligence bureau.

A previous Real Clear Investigations report by Paul Sperry described the ICA report and the dossier as one big echo chamber of circular reporting.

The core of the ICA report matches the central findings in Hillary’s phony dossier. For Brennan to claim the dossier wasn’t used for their findings is absurd, it’s a blatant lie. He perjured himself.

Brennan even put parts of the dossier into Obama’s daily briefing according to Sperry’s report:

“Brennan put some of the dossier material into the PDB [presidential daily briefing] for Obama and described it as coming from a ‘credible source,’ which is how they viewed Steele,” said the source familiar with the House investigation. “But they never corroborated his sources.”

All roads lead back to Hillary Clinton and John Brennan and Barack Obama — the architects of Spygate.

Hillary’s phony dossier was used to launch multiple investigations into Trump’s campaign, to launch the Mueller investigation, to obtain FISA warrants Carter Page and to claim the Russians interfered in the 2016 election.

It was all a lie and the dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, is the fruit of the poisonous tree.

That's not what your AG's report says, dear one.

Have you read it yet? Has it arrived in the 5th?

https://i.imgflip.com/3j7se1.jpg https://i.imgflip.com/3j7sja.jpg

https://i.imgflip.com/3j7slb.jpg

FBI Lawyer ,Kevin Clinesmith DELIBERATELY ALTERED a CIA EMAIL

to save the " validity " of the PHONEY STEELE DOSSIER*

if it wasn't for this criminal lawyer the STEELE DOSSIER

would not have passed the FISA application APPROVAL stage.

this filth WILL be going to JAIL !

That's another bot-drop, ma'am. Don't want to say?

Not many people know that the investigation into Trump by Fusion GPS started as a job paid for by a Right wing Media organisation.

Steele was more of a Trump Supporter knew Trumps daughter and had been invited to trump tower. What he learned in the investigation is where he determined that he would not support Trump.

Steele didn't know that the democrats were paying the bills.

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 12^th, 2019 at 10:49am:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/ig-report-confirms-brennan-lied-in-sworn-testimony-about-not-including-phony-dossier-in-ic-assessment-on-russian-interference/ IG Report Confirms Brennan Lied in SWORN Testimony About Not Including Phony Dossier in IC Assessment on Russian Interference by Cristina Laila December 11, 2019 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/photojoiner_photo-20-600x338.jpeg John Brennan When is John Brennan going to jail for committing perjury? DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz released his 476-page report on FISA abuses this week then testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. The IG report confirmed former CIA Director John Brennan did indeed rely on the phony dossier for the ICA report on so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election. John Brennan claimed in a May 2017 testimony under oath that Hillary’s phony dossier didn’t factor into the Intelligence Community’s Assessment report on Russian interference of the 2016 presidential election. Brennan told Trey Gowdy during his testimony when asked if the CIA relied on the dossier, “No. Because we — we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was — it was not.” Brennan then went on to repeatedly insist these claims to the public in various interviews with the media. However, as The Federalist reported, on page 179 of the IG report, Comey told IG investigators that he remembered having numerous discussions with John Brennan where the former CIA Director said the dossier was “important” enough to include in the ICA — Comey confirmed that yes, the dossier was part of the “corpus of intelligence information” the agency had. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2019-12-09-at-12.37.50-PM-600x292.png It’s important to note that former DNI chief James Clapper limited the IC report for review to only 3 agencies rather than send the report out to all 17 agencies for review. This way he was able to control what was put into the report. In fact, Clapper left out the relevant agencies with expertise on Russia such as the DHS and the State Department’s intelligence bureau. A previous Real Clear Investigations report by Paul Sperry described the ICA report and the dossier as one big echo chamber of circular reporting. The core of the ICA report matches the central findings in Hillary’s phony dossier. For Brennan to claim the dossier wasn’t used for their findings is absurd, it’s a blatant lie. He perjured himself. Brennan even put parts of the dossier into Obama’s daily briefing according to Sperry’s report: “Brennan put some of the dossier material into the PDB [presidential daily briefing] for Obama and described it as coming from a ‘credible source,’ which is how they viewed Steele,” said the source familiar with the House investigation. “But they never corroborated his sources.” All roads lead back to Hillary Clinton and John Brennan and Barack Obama — the architects of Spygate. Hillary’s phony dossier was used to launch multiple investigations into Trump’s campaign, to launch the Mueller investigation, to obtain FISA warrants Carter Page and to claim the Russians interfered in the 2016 election. It was all a lie and the dossier, paid for by Hillary Clinton and the DNC, is the fruit of the poisonous tree.

Quote:

Hillary’s phony dossier was used to launch multiple investigations into Trump’s campaign,

Here is where you shoot yourself in the foot and many claims in the article fall apart.

The IG report found that the Steele report played no part in the opening of any of the investigations. If you look at the timeline the investigations were opened before they even had the Steele dossier.

Also Brennan was with the CIA - The IR investigated the FBI ???  The CIA largely dismissed the Steele dossier. Nothing here really shows what you are saying.

Quote:

........... IG Report Confirms Brennan Lied in SWORN Testimony About Not Including Phony Dossier in IC Assessment on Russian Interference        ............

That is a bit naughty, isn't it?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 12^th, 2019 at 10:53pm:

Here is where you shoot yourself in the foot and many claims in the article fall apart. The IG report found that the Steele report played no part in the opening of any of the investigations. If you look at the timeline the investigations were opened before they even had the Steele dossier. Also Brennan was with the CIA - The IR investigated the FBI ???  The CIA largely dismissed the Steele dossier. Nothing here really shows what you are saying.

its incredible how foolish you make yourself to be on such a regular basis ????

you continually lie and have no idea what you are talking about ???

:D :D :D :D

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/12/ig-report-confirms-brennan-lied-in-sworn-testimony-about-not-including-phony-dossier-in-ic-assessment-on-russian-interference/

IG Report Confirms Brennan Lied in SWORN Testimony About Not Including Phony Dossier in IC Assessment on Russian Interference


by Cristina Laila December 11, 2019

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/photojoiner_photo-20-600x338.jpeg
John Brennan

When is John Brennan going to jail for committing perjury?

DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz released his 476-page report on FISA abuses this week then testified to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

The IG report confirmed former CIA Director John Brennan did indeed rely on the phony dossier for the ICA report on so-called Russian interference in the 2016 election.


John Brennan claimed in a May 2017 testimony under oath that Hillary’s phony dossier didn’t factor into the Intelligence Community’s Assessment report on Russian interference of the 2016 presidential election.

Brennan told Trey Gowdy during his testimony when asked if the CIA relied on the dossier, “No. Because we — we didn’t. It wasn’t part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the Intelligence Community assessment that was done. It was — it was not.”

Brennan then went on to repeatedly insist these claims to the public in various interviews with the media.


However, as The Federalist reported, on page 179 of the IG report, Comey told IG investigators that he remembered having numerous discussions with John Brennan where the former CIA Director said the dossier was “important” enough to include in the ICA — Comey confirmed that yes, the dossier was part of the “corpus of intelligence information” the agency had.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/Screen-Shot-2019-12-09-at-12.37.50-PM-600x292.png

It’s important to note that former DNI chief James Clapper limited the IC report for review to only 3 agencies rather than send the report out to all 17 agencies for review. This way he was able to control what was put into the report.

In fact, Clapper left out the relevant agencies with expertise on Russia such as the DHS and the State Department’s intelligence bureau.

A previous Real Clear Investigations report by Paul Sperry described the ICA report and the dossier as one big echo chamber of circular reporting.

The core of the ICA report matches the central findings in Hillary’s phony dossier. For Brennan to claim the dossier wasn’t used for their findings is absurd, it’s a blatant lie. He perjured himself.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 12^th, 2019 at 10:53pm:

Here is where you shoot yourself in the foot and many claims in the article fall apart. The IG report found that the Steele report played no part in the opening of any of the investigations. If you look at the timeline the investigations were opened before they even had the Steele dossier. Also Brennan was with the CIA - The IR investigated the FBI ???  The CIA largely dismissed the Steele dossier. Nothing here really shows what you are saying.

ooopsie daisy !

you didn't listen to this like I asked you to ..

and now you look more ignorant than you did before you made this silly ignorant statement above ???  :D :D :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0l5VpTqjRs

Graham opens IG hearing with scathing take on FISA report: The system failed


Graham lays it all out , if you do not listen to this presentation you will not be aware of the latest INTELLIGENCE *

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10^th, 2019 at 8:12pm:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 7:50pm: For those that cannot read , look here and facts will be explained unto thee @ 6:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiB7Syt0ug Hannity: Deep state in deep legal jeaopardy Steel was interviewed by John Durham and spilled the beans .. the Dossier was " intelligence from an unreliable source " ( an ACTIVE Russian SPY !! ) JUICY !!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANB0pfmSLpg James Comey's thought process on Moscow hotel room escapades does Comey know where the Urine soaked checks are ??? lets listen !!

Comey the corrupt fraud thinks that it was suspicious that Trump reacted so strongly about the fake Pee Pee Dozier.

So the President of the US has a false story alleging disgusting acts by him that he denies strenuously. So this genius Comey concludes that this is evidence of guilt! Anyone with an ounce of pride and dignity would do exactly the same.

What an idiot!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bui45pQcy6E

Carter Page: We’re taking this case to the Supreme Court

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnBv8iMzSU4

SIDNEY POWELL "It was definitely illegal"
"

@ 2:15 , in JANUARY 2017 THE FBI GOT SOLID INFORMATION DISCREDITING THE STEELE DOSSIER , AND YET THE FBI DID NOT SHARE THAT INFORMATION WITH THE FISA COURT ,

AND THEY GOT 2 RENEWALS !!! OBAMA AND COMEY ARE GOING DOWN BIG TIME !!!

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/fbi-didnt-tell-fisa-court-about-steele-dossier-issues-report-102407

https://i.imgflip.com/3jbpc3.jpg

December 5, 2019

FBI Didn't Tell FISA Court About Steele Dossier Issues: Report

The FBI used the dossier to wiretap Trump's campaign, but it was not 'entirely reliable.'

by Chuck Ross
The FBI failed to tell surveillance court judges that investigators developed concerns about the reliability of the Steele dossier after interviewing a source for the document, according to a new report.

According to The Washington Post, sources familiar with the forthcoming Justice Department inspector general’s (IG) report say that FBI agents determined that information from Christopher Steele was not “entirely reliable” after they interviewed a subsource for the former British spy.

The IG’s finding could undercut one of Democrats’ main defenses of Steele, who investigated the Trump campaign in 2016 on behalf of Fusion GPS. Democrats have argued that Steele was a credible source with a solid track record of providing information to the U.S. government.

The FBI relied on information from Steele, a former British spy, in applications for four Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants against Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. Steele’s dossier alleged that Page met secretly with two Kremlin insiders to discuss ways to help the Trump campaign in exchange for a brokerage stake in the sale of Russian oil giant Rosneft.

Steele also reported that Page was part of the Trump campaign’s “well developed conspiracy of cooperation” with Russia, and that it was Page’s idea to release Democratic National Committee emails through WikiLeaks.

The FBI cited some of that information in four FISA warrant applications, the first of which was submitted on Oct. 21, 2016.

The special counsel’s report undercut many of the allegations against Page. It found that nobody on the Trump team acted as a Russian agent or conspired with Russians to influence the 2016 election. It also found that no Americans were involved in hacking or releasing DNC emails.

Steele’s sourcing for his dossier has largely remained a mystery. It is also unclear what steps the FBI took to verify the dossier.

Michael Horowitz, the inspector general, is expected to release the report Monday. He will testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday. The Post also reported that even with the omissions about the reliability of Steele’s information, the FBI still met the relatively low bar needed to obtain the surveillance warrants against Page.

The New York Times has previously reported that FBI agents tracked down and interviewed one of Steele’s sources in January 2017, around the time that BuzzFeed published the dossier.

According to The Times, the FBI agents suspected that the source embellished some of the information provided to Steele. The source was not identified, but was described as a Russian speaker living in the West who hailed from a former Soviet republic.

Richdude wrote on Dec 13^th, 2019 at 1:25am:

it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 8:12pm: it_is_the_light wrote on Dec 10th, 2019 at 7:50pm: For those that cannot read , look here and facts will be explained unto thee @ 6:20 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGiB7Syt0ug Hannity: Deep state in deep legal jeaopardy Steel was interviewed by John Durham and spilled the beans .. the Dossier was " intelligence from an unreliable source " ( an ACTIVE Russian SPY !! ) JUICY !!!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANB0pfmSLpg James Comey's thought process on Moscow hotel room escapades does Comey know where the Urine soaked checks are ??? lets listen !! Comey the corrupt fraud thinks that it was suspicious that Trump reacted so strongly about the fake Pee Pee Dozier. So the President of the US has a false story alleging disgusting acts by him that he denies strenuously. So this genius Comey concludes that this is evidence of guilt! Anyone with an ounce of pride and dignity would do exactly the same. What an idiot!

Really?

The telling I heard was Mr Trump never batted an eyelid, but Comey started to see little beads of sweat appearing through his makeup. Anyway, Comey provided a transcript.

"Do you remember that time in Moscow? You stayed there for a Miss Universe Pageant, I think."

"Yeah. What are they saying?"

"Just that, you know, you had those prostitutes up in your room in the diplomatic suite. You...."

"There! You see? A lie. It was the presidential suite. What else?"

"Well, you got them to - how do I put this - urinate on you. You were on the bed, you see, and then..."

"Obama slept in that bed. Did you know that? They gave me the bed Obama slept in."

"I see. Well, that explains the urination, but..."

"Look, it's crap."

"You don't have to tell me that, sir, I'm just passing on the report."

"Tell me, does it smell right? Does it ring true in any way?"

"That's impossible for me to say, sir."

"Listen, I want you to send your best men in to find out more, find out what they've got - saying, I mean. Find out what they're saying. It's all sht, you know."

"I understand. Well, we can have a look into it. The dates certainly stack up. We know you were there."

"Look, I just went in for a shower, okay? Just changed and got out."

"Certainly."

"I stayed a night. Two - tops."

"Okay."

"I was on transit. The guys would know. My bodyguards..."

"Alright, we can check."

"For Melania's sake. I don't want her hearing all that crap, it's fake news."

"I see."

"It'll give me the chance to square things up - come up with a strategy. I can get Mike onto it. If I know what they're saying, I can frame it right, you know?"

"I get that, sir."

"There's a lot of bad people out there, believe me. They've got nothing better to do than spy on me and make stuff up."

"Of course."

"They probably had a spy camera or something, they do this stuff all the time."

"Make stuff up?"

"Yeah. They're sick."

"I see."

"Do it for Melania, okay? It's not for me. I know what happened."

"You had a shower."

"Right. Then the tap burst and, you know... Look, they're sick people, okay?

"I understand, Mr President, we'll check it out."

"The toilet was overflowing, it smelt of piss. Probably the previous guy..."

"No problem, sir, you don't have to say."

"The footage is some actor or model, I guarantee it. Hey - can we say it was Joe Biden or someone?"

"We'd need to have the facts first."

"Good, get onto it. Tell me what you get."

WASHINGTON POST

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/12/26/rachel-maddow-rooted-steele-dossier-be-true-then-it-fell-apart/

Rachel Maddow rooted for the Steele dossier to be true. Then it fell apart.

https://i.imgflip.com/3klr3p.jpg

Rachel Maddow, host of MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Show, moderates a panel at a forum called “Perspectives on National Security,” at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, in Oct. 2017. (Steven Senne/AP)
Image without a caption
By
Erik Wemple
Media critic
December 26, 2019 at 11:43 AM EST
Fifth in a series on the media’s handling of the Steele dossier. See Parts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.

In March 2017, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow invited Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) onto her show to talk Russia. She noted that in a House hearing, Schiff had cited the 35-page dossier of memorandums compiled by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. Ever since that document had burst into national politics — and surfaced on the BuzzFeed website in January 2017 — Maddow had closely monitored its reception.

Each time she addressed the dossier, she was careful to alert viewers that it was unverified. But she had espied some developments that appeared to support the dossier’s nitty-gritty. So she asked Schiff: “When you cited … that dossier, should we stop describing that as an uncorroborated dossier? Has some of the information of that been corroborated?”

Schiff sidestepped the question.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not. Over a nearly two-year investigation released on Dec. 9, Horowitz and a team of investigators reviewed at least a million records, interviewed more than 100 individuals and otherwise probed the actions of the FBI and the Justice Department in the Russia investigation. In so doing, they reached an answer to Maddow’s question.

Claims in the 35-page dossier fell into three pails, according to the report: “The FBI concluded, among other things, that although consistent with known efforts by Russia to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections, much of the material in the Steele election reports, including allegations about Donald Trump and members of the Trump campaign relied upon in the Carter Page FISA applications, could not be corroborated; that certain allegations were inaccurate or inconsistent with information gathered by the Crossfire Hurricane team; and that the limited information that was corroborated related to time, location and title information, much of which was publicly available.”

The Horowitz team didn’t attempt an independent fact-check of the dossier, opting instead to report what the FBI had concluded about the document. Unflattering revelations pop up at every turn in the 400-page-plus report. It reveals that the CIA considered it a hodgepodge of “internet rumor”; that the FBI considered one of its central allegations — that former Trump attorney Michael Cohen had traveled to Prague for a collusive meeting with Russians — “not true”; that Steele’s sources weren’t quite a crack international spy team. After the 2016 election, for instance, Steele directed his primary source to seek corroboration of the claims. “According to [an FBI official], during an interview in May 2017, the Primary Sub-source said the corroboration was ‘zero,’” reads the report.

The ubiquity of Horowitz’s debunking passages suggests that he wanted the public to come away with the impression that the dossier was a flabby, hasty, precipitous, conclusory charade of a document. Viewers of certain MSNBC fare were surely blindsided by the news, if they ever even heard it.

Name a host on cable news who has dug more deeply into Trump-Russia than MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow. She’s read hundreds, maybe thousands, of court filings; she’s read the plume of literature on Russia-Trump; and she’s out with a new book on the bane of petro-states: “Blowout: Corrupted Democracy, Rogue State Russia, and the Richest, Most Destructive Industry on Earth.”

AD
As part of her Russianist phase, Maddow became a clearinghouse for news increments regarding the dossier. Just days after BuzzFeed published the dossier in its entirety, she reported on the frustration of congressional Democrats with then-FBI Director James B. Comey, who was declining to divulge whether his people had opened an investigation into possible coordination between Russia and the 2016 Trump presidential campaign.

Director Comey refused to answer my question about whether the FBI has investigated Trump campaign contacts with Russia

— Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) January 10, 2017
Sorting through the silence from the FBI and the unverified claims in the dossier, Maddow riffed on her Jan. 13, 2017, program: “I mean, had the FBI looked into what was in that dossier and found that it was all patently false, they could tell us that now, right?” said Maddow. “I mean, the dossier has now been publicly released. If the FBI looked into it and they found it was all trash, there’s no reason they can’t tell us that now. They’re not telling us that now. They’re not saying that. They’re not saying anything.”

It is amazing just how dumb you would need to be in order to support the garbage Trump puts out,and just as amazing how many here are just that dumb.

At least you can see the republican politicians ducking and weaving refusing to answer simple questions while the sprout the Trump irrelevant line. Yes the series of questions the republicans one and all just won't answer. Only because they know that Trump is guilty, you can watch them all doing it but don't expect the Trump Lloydies to understand.

I don't care about all that ... I just wanna see the Pee Pee tapes!

https://media.giphy.com/media/tFK8urY6XHj2w/giphy.gif

The Steele dossier is probably 85% correct. About as good as these things tend to get.

Dnarever wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 6:19pm:

It is amazing just how dumb you would need to be in order to support the garbage Trump puts out,and just as amazing how many here are just that dumb. At least you can see the republican politicians ducking and weaving refusing to answer simple questions while the sprout the Trump irrelevant line. Yes the series of questions the republicans one and all just won't answer. Only because they know that Trump is guilty, you can watch them all doing it but don't expect the Trump Lloydies to understand.

The thing Steve Bannon loved about Mr Trump was that he was prepared to take any stance and "just not give a sht".

Switch parties? Sure. Anti-abortion? Why not? Pro-guns? Okay.

When preparing for the primary debates, they'd throw the odd curve ball in. How do you explain that you've only ever donated to a Republican campaign once - Rudy Giuliani. And that was to get a Manhattan property deal stitched up. You've even said it yourself. Every other candidate you've donated was a Democrat.

Nonsense, Mr Trump said, it's all fake news. I've supported Republicans all my life. I've always voted Republican.

You can't say that, Mr Trump, it's all on the public record - every donation and every vote you've ever made. You've only voted once - Rudy Giuliani in the mayoral primary race.

Really?

When Bannon took over, he told Mr Trump he'd have to get the Bible Belt, and that meant being pro-life.

Sorry?

Pro-life. You've always been pro-choice. You've always said you support a woman's right to choose.

Bannon believed this was probably because Mr Trump had encouraged a few women to have abortions himself.

That's okay, Mr Trump said, I can be pro-life. Life's good.

Bannon didn't think Mr Trump knew what he was talking about. Still, he admired Mr Trump's ability to just ad lib, erase all history and lie through his teeth. Mr Trump didn't seem to give a sht about the consequences.

These weren't moral or political beliefs Mr Trump had formed and committed to, they were marketing ploys -like deciding which contestant should win the Apprentice based on the advertising demographics. You know, the advertisers were going for the black market, Hispanics or working women. The contestants were chosen to target these audiences. The Apprentice did product placements directly. Producers based the narrative of each show around the products. Mr Trump never cared which products or contestants, he'd go wherever he was told. For Bannon, that was his strength. Sure he could get a little tetchy and obstinate, but on the big things, he either didn't understand or he didn't care. Mr Trump was like a honey badger, Bannon said. "He just don't give a sht".

The perfect candidate, no?

Dnarever wrote on Dec 28^th, 2019 at 6:40pm:

The Steele dossier is probably 85% correct. About as good as these things tend to get.

Mr Trump's crowd wouldn't care if it was. Prostitutes? So what? Why wouldn't he have prostitutes? He has a healthy sexual appetite, doesn't he?

Yes, but planted by a foreign leader, a leader who organised these operations when he worked as a KGB agent...

So? That's just what they do. How would Mr Trump know anything about that?

A message, a phone call, a blackmail letter...

They blackmailed him? So? Why would that make any difference? Doesn't mean Mr Trump would change on his position on any of the important stuff.

Like foreign policy? The Ukraine, Eastern Europe, Syria...

Who cares? We'd be best left out of it anyway.

And not just foreign policy, Putin directly campaigned for Trump in the US election itself...

Look, so what if Putin helped Mr Trump out a bit? Friends are friends. That's what you do. They all do it.

It's never happened to anyone's knowledge before...

So they're doing it now. That doesn't matter. Friends should help each other out. Wouldn't you if you liked someone, really believed in them?

Enough to blackmail them...

That's just playing it safe. You have to do it. If you were a world leader, you'd do it too. The US does it more than anyone.

Yes, but Trump wants to stop all that...

Exactly.

By doing the bidding of a corrupt foreign leader who meddles in other countries' elections and...

Yes, but only in America's interest.

Russia's interest...

Well why not? If we can help Russia a bit too, that's a good thing, right?

Putin's interest...

Him too. Everyone wants to get ahead in life, don't they?

By taking over a nuclear-armed country, turning it into a hotbed of corruption, jailing and killing political opponents, laundering the profits of bribes into foreign accounts to the tune of billions and annexing neighbouring countries so he can do it there too...

They all do it. In those circles, you have to do it to survive.

Invasion and illegal occupation, foreign political meddling, false detention, murder, bribery, blackmail, prostitutes...

Well, yes. It's just the way it goes, I'm afraid.

And Trump...

Well, he's never said he's an angel, now has he?

SPOKEN AND AUTHORISED BY THE GOP, THE NRA, THE COUNCIL OF EVANGELICAL CHURCHES, FOX NEWS, Q AND REAL AMERICANS EVERYWHHERE.