| Australian Politics Forum | |
|
http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl
Member Run Boards >> Fringe >> Earthrise http://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1572041755 Message started by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:15am |
|
|
Title: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:15am
While Light isn't hanging about playgrounds touching himself he is claiming this famous photo isn't actually a photo.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:18am
you lose
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:18am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:15am:
total photoshop and CGI, no stars in the background huh ? who took he photo .. mickey mouse ? he took the stars away lol !! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:20am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:18am:
There was Photoshop in 1968? CGI? My cell phone has a computer more powerful than sent a man to the moon. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:22am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:15am:
AiA loses an argument and accuses people of hanging around playgrounds and touching themselves this is how disgusting this individual is and should be banned for saying such outrageous perverted things , all because he loses another argument |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:23am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:20am:
yes because the moon landing was faked and was a movie by Stanley Kubrick televised to everyone on the planet in 1969 |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:23am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:22am:
There is no argument. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:25am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:23am:
I know, you lose |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:26am
Are there other lunatics who believe Earthrise is a fake, Light? Are they AMBLA members too? Do you all meet at the playground?
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:26am
The image in the photo is a 'fake' version of Ocean-Earth.
It is also 'flat'. Realists are kinda making a comeback in the wake of all the 'Fake' that is being pumped out there by Technology and there is a lot of it. Also as a running joke of defiance against so-called Western Intellectuality, which lacks common sense in favour of a legal 'technicality' - so the Realists embrace the technicality of everything technologically enhanced is 'Fake' (flat). You will find that in many Sci-Fi (written by very intellectual minds) will describe how a part of Humanity will always 'rebel' against the 'Fake Humanity' (Androids) that is brought about by 'technology'. Even Tolkien brushed upon the Flat Earth with his Elven Races going 'The Straight Way' beyond the spin of the planet. Show me a photo of Ocean-Earth and I will say "Fake & Flat". Show me the reality of the world around us through our own eyes... |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:34am
Yes, and if I showed you a photo of my wife you would say she is no more than an inch tall and very flat ...
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:43am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:34am:
Exactly. Realists are those who prefer to experience as much as they can in person. Not attend the auto-teller machine, but the person inside the bank. I'm much like that. I prefer to wait in line at Woolworths for the check-out Employee, than go to the machine to process. You can see the effects on people who saturate themselves with 'Fake' experiences, compared to those who don't. Like that Employee who grows from being in a 'People' job, compared to the employee who works alone on a machine all day, locked away in a factory... its like 40,000 years of isolation. I'm a realist. The Earth Science has projected is Fake. Stress is what ages people the most, even kills. Realists are aiming away from the stress. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Captain Nemo on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:57am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:18am:
Oh no ... not that tired old argument again ... If you take a photo in sunlight that has correct exposure for the objects you are taking the photo of, then the stars are not visible. If you wanted to see the stars in the background, the Moon and Earth would be very very over exposed. It's not rocket science ... Oh, wait ... in this case it IS rocket science! ;) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:07am Captain Nemo wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 9:57am:
the ONLY photo of earth from space in existence AiA says .. black background stars have disappeared :D :D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Captain Nemo on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:10am
See above and think about photographic exposure.
;) p.s. Can you see the other stars from here on Earth in daylight? Scattered bright Sunlight means you can't seen 'em during the day. Same principle. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:15am Captain Nemo wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:10am:
black background = night time and stars have disappeared :D :D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:17am
http://nightflight.com/operation-lune-how-stanley-kubrick-faked-the-apollo-11-moon-landing/
“Opération Lune”: How Stanley Kubrick faked the Apollo 11 moon landing “In six days God created the heavens and the earth. On the seventh day, Stanley Kubrick sent everything back for modifications.” So begins the voiceover narration for Opération Lune (English title: Dark Side of the Moon), William Karel’s 2002 French documentary exposé on how director Stanley Kubrick helped NASA fake the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. The documentary featured interviews from many key players in NASA and the US government, including astronaut Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, Alexander Haig, Richard Helms, Henry Kissinger, and Donald Rumsfeld, to name just a few, as well as Kubrick’s widow Christiane Kubrick and her brother, his surviving brother-in-law, executive producer Jan Harlan. It begins with the startling revelation that Kubrick was approached to film footage for the Apollo 11 moon landing in a studio setting; NASA had wanted a fallback contingency plan in case astronaut Neil Armstrong’s first steps could not be filmed, knowing that this was going to be a global event seen worldwide. If there were any problems, and the actual first steps on the moon were not captured, then NASA and other branches of the U.S. government were afraid that it would cause unforeseeable problems, and perhaps even embolden our enemies, and so they wanted something to show viewers so that any issues that Apollo 11 were having could be dealt with privately. In exchange for creating this film footage, NASA would loan Kubrick a unique and secretive camera lens that he had wanted to use on his movie Barry Lyndon, which he was already involved with in production. That lens — identified as Carl Zeiss 50mm f/0.7, which had been designed by Zeiss in 1966 on a special request for the Apollo program — was initially created by NASA to be used by the U.S. government for the purposes of Cold War spying. The narrator tells us the lens was the only one capable of filming in pitch darkness (the narrator for the original French version was Philippe Faure, and was later redone in English by Andrew Solomon). Ten of these lens were made, and Barry Lyndon’s cinematographer, John Alcott, claimed that Kubrick brought three of the leftover lenses from this batch that had been sold to NASA, and they had to be extensively modified for him to be able to use on his 35mm movie camera (one of the lenses is located in the German Movie Museum in Frankfurt). Kubrick with NASA officials in the late 60s. Left to right: Frederick Ordway (in white), Deke Slayton, Arthur C. Clarke, unidentified man (behind Clarke), Stanley Kubrick, George Mueller Arthur C. Clarke talking to Kubrick in England. George Mueller of NASA is on the far right. Co-produced by Point du Jour Production and ARTE France, the documentary was first air on French TV on October 16, 2002, and there was quite a bit of interest in the topic of whether or not Kubrick had filmed this footage. It was aired again on SBS TV in Australia on April 1, 2003 (note the date), and then a year later, at least ten television channels worldwide on the same calendar date, April 1, 2004, and afterwards the TV audience were treated to a debate, and also sent to a website which featured an interview with the director. In England it was aired on Channel 4, but not until September that same year (initially the BBC had rejected it because they perceived it as being part of an “anti-American campaign” in French documentaries), and in 2005, it was broadcast on the Canadian TV series “The Passionate Eye”, who described it this way: How could the flag flutter when there’s no wind on the moon? During an interview with Stanley Kubrick’s widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon. In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn’t afford any expensive public relations failures. Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn’t be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). all having a good ole belly laugh at the masonic signs being displayed the " profane " ( you ) are so stupid ! they say |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:18am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:18am :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Captain Nemo on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:18am
If a photo is taken when the the earth is in darkness, the other stars are visible.
It really shouldn't be hard to understand this. :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:19am :D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:21am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:15am:
The Earth is approximately four times the size of the moon. That means standing on the bright side of the moon looking back at Earth. Generally the Earth would appear 4 times bigger than the moon appears when standing on Earth looking at the moon. Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:22am Captain Nemo wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:18am:
hollywood CGI |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:22am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51DED8dcNkA
NASA Admits They Can't Send Humans Through The Van Allen Radiation Belts huh what ? we cant go Through The Van Allen Radiation Belts ?? this guy sounds crazy ! they already did that in 1969 !! :D :D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:22am
For God's Sake, somebody please stop Light's spam.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:23am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:22am:
Quote:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:23am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:22am:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:24am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKgqDes03KQ
Moon Landing HOAX! ALL FAKE! We NEVER Went To The Moon!!! Published on Nov 19, 2016 HOUSTON! WE HAVE A PROBLEM! One SMALL Hoax For Man; One GIANT Lie For Humanity!!!!!!! Because it’s IMPOSSIBLE for man to go to the moon! It can only be made possible through Hellywood! On Sunday, July 20th, 1969, NASA launched Apollo 11 to become what is commonly known the first mission to put humans on the moon. Astronauts by the names of Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins, and Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin, Jr., would become known as the "first humans" to step foot on the moon — an event witnessed by billions of people. But what if I told you such an "event" never happened the way NASA wants us to believe? What if I told you no one has EVER stepped foot on the moon? And what if I told you there's a bigger coverup indeed? In this video, we will be discussing all of the reasons why the moon landings were fake, hoaxed, and why this "conspiracy theory" isn't much of a "conspiracy theory" after all. We will also be talking about how the moon landings were faked, why they were faked, who benefits, and the BIGGER Agenda behind pulling such a grand hoax for all the world to see. What Could Be The BIGGER Agenda Here?!?! THE TRUTH REVEALED!!! STAY ALERT AS ALWAYS! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Captain Nemo on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:24am
You're like Malcolm Roberts. :D
I really would prefer to leave you to your own weird ideas, just like him. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:25am
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/wikileaks-documents-reveal-apollo-program-was-a-fraud-moon-landings-never-happened/
WIKILEAKS DOCUMENTS REVEAL APOLLO PROGRAM WAS A FRAUD, MOON LANDINGS NEVER HAPPENED New documents scheduled to be released this week by Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, could reveal damaging information about NASA’s Apollo program, believe experts. Julian Assange, who has lived at Ecuador’s London embassy since June 2012 in fear of being extradited to the United States to face espionage and conspiracy charges arising from the leaking of thousands of secret diplomatic and military documents by US Army private Chelsea Manning, has announced that he will release incriminating evidence that the government of the Unites States of America and NASA have hidden the truth about the Apollo program and the lunar landings for more than 40 years. « These documents reveal the true reason behind the Apollo program deception and how this all played out in the Cold War strategy of the government of the United States at the time » – Julian Assange, Wikileaks founder The documents are said to have been handed to the WikiLeaks founder by a “retired high ranking official of NASA that has worked within the government for over 45 years”, Assange told reporters. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is about to reveal documents that could prove the Apollo space program was an elaborate scheme to dupe the Russians into a space race that never occurred Damaging information for NASA The documents to be released this week could cause up a stir weeks after NASA has announced it is preparing for another moon landing mission in 2030. «These documents that have been entrusted to me come from a highly known and respected high ranking official of the U.S. government who desires to leave this as a testament to the world before he dies. His desire is to stay anonymous as to not embroil his family and friends into a major polemic that could possibly destroy their lives» he told reporters. Top officials of the Chinese space program last year accused the government of the United States of “faking” the moon landings after the Chinese lunar rover found no evidence of the Apollo program moon landings after investigating the same area where the Apollo 11 mission allegedly landed on 20 July 1969. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:25am
;D ;D
funny as watching Light & AiA go at each other. Like the Odd Couple. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:26am
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/chinese-lunar-rover-finds-no-evidence-of-american-moon-landings/
CHINESE LUNAR ROVER FINDS NO EVIDENCE OF AMERICAN MOON LANDINGS 200 high-ranking officials from the Chinese Space Program have signed a petition asking explanations from the American government and the release of classified NASA information concerning the American moon landings that would prove to the World that the moon landings were not an elaborately orchestrated hoax to fool the World about America’s space program capabilities. These allegations have come up through recent analysis of pictures taken from the Chinese moon rover that allegedly found no traces of the American moon landings existing on the moon. Pictures taken from Yutu, the Chinese moon rover, that has landed on the moon in 2013, allegedly shows no proof whatsoever of the American moon landings ever happening World renowned Russian nuclear engineer Yury Ignatyevich Mukhin has also signed the petition as well as a dozen other top Russian engineers and ex-KGB agents claiming the Russian Government “had always been aware of the situation since the early 1970’s” These recent discoveries could strangely give credence to conspiracy theorists whom have claimed for decades that America had never gone to the moon but that the American moon landings were but an elaborate hoax to foul Russia into the space race and eventually, the nuclear arms race, with the purpose of ruining Russia, much like the financing of the Mujahideen forces during the soviet Afghanistan war successfully achieved. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:27am
moon boots and moon rocks !!!
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:29am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 8:20am:
:D :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:32am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am7qKLj22FY
Moon hoax Buzz Aldrin reveals Moon destination |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:33am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxZMjpMhwNE
Irrefutable Proof for Moon Landing - Lunar Gravity Uploaded on Aug 6, 2009 Lunar gravity as determined from official NASA Apollo footage provides irrefutable proof for being filmed on the moon. In addition to the Apollo 14 SEQ Bay Pendulum the Apollo 16 Flying Bag is analyzed to provide g = 1.54 and 1.57 m/s^2 in agreement with lunar gravity (g = 1.62 m/s^2) and distinct from earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2). Therefore, both, pendulum and free fall motion confirm lunar gravity within a 5 % error margin. Moon landing conspiracy theorists have accused NASA to simulate lunar gravity by using wires and decreasing playback speed, but failed to recognize that there is only ONE physically correct playback speed for such an operation: 41 % (SQRT (1/6)) - as seen by using the equation » P = 2pi * SQRT (L / g) « for the pendulum or » t = SQRT (2y / g) « for free fall. Consequently, it should be possible to restore the alleged original 1g conditions by increasing the playback speed to 246 % (SQRT 6). Under these conditions objects move as if accelerated by earth gravity (g = 9.81 m/s^2) but movements of the astronauts become incredibly fast, showing the impossibility to simulate lunar gravity by slowing down footage recorded on earth. All NASA footage obtained from public domain, AS14 SEQ Bay Pendulum cropped, AS16 Flying Bag animation with timer reproduced at 80% playback speed. All other footage reproduced at 100% (for lunar gravity) or 246% (for earth gravity) playback speed. Music: Ghostwriter by RJ2D Suggested by The Orchard Music RJD2 - A Beautiful Mine (Theme From Mad Men) Category Science & Technology |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Ye Grappler on Oct 26th, 2019 at 11:18am
Yeah, well - I went to Sutherland Shire a few times and never once saw any proof that the first fleet had ever arrived there..... no ships, no footprints... nothing but a few signs that could have been just put there by anybody...
Maybe this Invasion thing is a hoax ..... maybe whartey never left the lend here or arrived to tek it over, bro and lock the Koons out of Ayers Rock etc.... Politics of division - say, bro - dat a Whartey proof fence yo' got dere? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bobby. on Oct 26th, 2019 at 11:28am
I don't often disagree with master Light but I do on this topic.
I am absolutely 100% certain that men landed on the Moon 6 times. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 11:29am Bobby. wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 11:28am:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 26th, 2019 at 2:09pm
.
q23phJSyM8QF8mVpnJtE8h-1200-80_001.jpg (35 KB | 30
) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 2:17pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 2:57pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-g3ku3ehzVMhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_OD2V6fMLQ
MOON HOAX TOTALLY PROVEN Apollo11: Lunar Landing July 20, 1969 :D :D :D :D crikey look at the footage ! lunar lander snowjob where is the moonbuggy !!!!!!!!!2:22 !!!! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 2:57pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_OD2V6fMLQ&feature=youtu.be
Secret Moon - NASA fake moon and mars hoax PROVEN look here first 10 seconds images you were never meant to see ! Published on Oct 15, 2015 A film exposing once and for all the moon landing hoax and the fake NASA Apollo moon and Mars Spirit, Curiosity and Viking Mars landings. This film will change the way you look at the world forever. The film was made because NASA are about to pull of yet another big lie (that there is life in the universe) or that the conditions for life are everywhere prevalent. Yet unless NASA come clean and tell us what they have faked in an age of CGI then we cannot trust them. It is very unhelpful to have blind faith in man without third part corroboration and even if it comes that third party corroboration cannot be trusted if it comes from other space agencies or countries who are also faking their space programs. Astronauts are brave men and women, but can we trust NASA? Do they tell the truth? Are vested interests at stake? Was the Apollo moon landing a hoax? In light of all the latest revelations about water on Mars and possible life on other planets, can we trust the images we are being shown and the statements that are being made? With NASA recently sacking Christian scientists are they part of the 'progressive' atheistic agenda to move humanity away from a belief in God with emphasis on the materialistic model while imply that life is everywhere in the Universe. Many people suspect NASA are about to pull of another deception as big or bigger than the moon landing hoax and it is for this reason that this documentary movie was made. NASA have achieved great things, the space shuttle for example, although it was essentially an airplane attached two large fireworks which proved inherently unsafe. It would be wise for us to not get swept along with the progressive agenda in which mankind conquers all if that narrative is untrue or we may have far too much faith in ourselves to our own determent and self destruction. moon landing conspiracy and the moon landing hoax which is sometimes called the moon landing fake or the moon landing hoax debunked and the moon landing documentary and apollo hoax proof or infact the moon landing conspiracy and moon landing hoax 13:25 is the Apollo 16 stagehand footage. Glen Moore debunked the claim this was a hoax but one additional bit Glen missed (the green screan Svector claimed he used does not include a shadow). 32:52 I have seen NASA apologists claim the reason the film changes speed is because they did not take much to the moon, if this is the case they will need to explain why it only speeds up when they are standing up or throwing something, but is on slow motion for moon walking and jumping. 43:00 In the film, The Shining their is a sequence which seems to imply he was threatened that he was not to speak out that he was involved in the filming of the moon hoax. Certainly that was in the intended implication. 1:48 this funny compilation was the great work of Paustal Service. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 2:58pm LOOK AT FACTS !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umq09Z7WCMw yes red white and blue paint ..? how could that possibly be there through re-entry ? also the craft is ' supposed ' to fly like this .. which is a total lie because as you can see in the video it was flying UPSIDE~DOWN until the parachutes deployed :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D that also proves the parachutes and flotation devices are NOT POSSIBLE to factually exist with the space afforded in the cabin , you would have to be severely retarded to even entertain this sham hoax from 1969' yet either way keep smilin ' namaste |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 3:01pm
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/03/20/if-the-moon-landings-were-real-then-why-is-nasa-stumped-by-this/
If the Moon Landings Were Real, Then Why is NASA Stumped by This? By WakingTimes March 20, 2015 During the cold war era the Soviet Union and the United States were locked in an arms and technology race, each nation wanting to prove their dominance over the other, each striving to be the next reigning superpower in a world still shattered by the second world war. The Soviet’s took the lead when in April of 1961, cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin successfully orbited the earth and returned home safely. In May, president John F. Kennedy made his special message to Congress on urgent national needs, declaring America’s intention to send a man to the moon. “I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth. No single space project in this period will be more impressive to mankind, or more important for the long-range exploration of space.” -President John F. Kennedy, Address to Congress on Urgent National Needs, May 25, 1961 And so we did. In 1969, under the leadership of President Nixon, the entire world watched in grainy, black-and-white awe as the ‘giant leap for mankind’ was broadcast on television sets around the globe. Neil Armstrong planted the American flag in the coarse lifeless dust of the moon, and the space race was over. America victorious. Take a look at this marvelous achievement here: https://youtu.be/RMINSD7MmT4 Fast forward 45 years to a much more technologically advanced and interconnected age, where ideas spread like wildfire, and questions that have gone unanswered for generations are easily put to millions of people. One person’s ideas and understanding of our world can swiftly be supplemented by the knowledge of many others, dots are easier to connect, and truth is more freely revealed. Were the Apollo moon landings faked by the government to gain political advantage at a time when it was not technologically possible to land a man on the moon then bring him home safely? Many alternative researchers and skeptics of government and cultural narratives have put together a substantial and rather captivating case that the moon landings were faked with the help of emerging television and film technologies. They posit that the government hired acclaimed film director Stanley Kubrick to stage the landings by creating a convincing movie set in a secret location. Evidence to the support the idea that the video is indeed an elaborate forgery includes anomalies such as the appearance of multiple sources of light in the footage, the flag planted by Armstrong seems to be waving in an environment with no wind, there does not appear to be an impact crater from the lunar landing module, unexplainable objects appear in reflection on helmet visors, the unusual slow-motion effect of the astronauts walking on the lunar surface, the lack of visible stars in the background, and more. The footage is one thing, but many point to the existence of a dangerous concentration of solar and cosmic radiation that surrounds the earth as proof that Apollo never made it to the moon. Between the earth and the moon lie what is known as the Van Allen radiation belts. “The Van Allen radiation belts are a torus (doughnut shape) of energetic charged particles circling Earth around its magnetic equator and held in place by Earth’s magnetic field. The main belts extend from an altitude of about 1,000 to 60,000 kilometers above the surface in which region radiation levels vary. Most of the particles that form the belts are thought to come from solar wind and other particles by cosmic rays.” –Robert A. Braeunig In order for the Apollo, or any lunar mission, to be successful, the equipment and crew aboard the spacecraft would have to be adequately shielded from exposure from the intense radiation surrounding planet earth. Robert A. Braeunig, author of Rocket & Space Technology has put together a compelling scientific refutation of the Apollo hoax theory, making the scientific case that the trajectory of the Apollo spacecraft allowed the vessel to avoid the highest concentrations of energy in the torus shaped Van Allen belts which do not fully encircle the earth. With the right trajectory, he purports, it would only be necessary to shield against the possibility of an unexpected increase in solar activity, something Apollo was indeed prepared for. This makes sense and would seem to close the case, but for many the question still remains, especially so in light of the fact that there have since been no more lunar missions, and almost 50 years later NASA’s Orion mission is apparently just now trying to solve the challenge of the Van Allen belts. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:07pm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3130017/Russian-official-demands-investigation-really-happened-moon-landing-original-footage-disappeared.html
Russia suggests America has NEVER landed on the moon and calls for 'an investigation into what really happened' Vladimir Markin has demanded an investigation into the moon landings Says its vital to find out what happened to original footage from 1969 The footage was lost by Nasa who accidentally erased it in the 1980s The government official says it could reveal insights into space journeys By JENNIFER NEWTON FOR MAILONLINE PUBLISHED: 02:01 EST, 19 June 2015 | UPDATED: 19:41 EST, 19 June 2015 A Russian official has has cast doubt on the first moon landings and demanded an investigation into what really happened after original Nasa footage of the event disappeared. Vladimir Markin, a spokesman for the Russian government's Investigative Committee, says he wants an inquiry after the video from 1969 and a piece of lunar rock, which was brought back to earth, went missing. In an opinion piece in the Russian newspaper Izvestia, Mr Markin says that such an inquiry is vital to reveal new insights into the historical space journey. Scroll down to video Russian official Vladimir Markin has demanded an investigation into the first moon landing after original footage of the event went missing :D :D :D :D According to the translation in the Moscow Times, Mr Markin claimed Russia were ‘not contending that they did not fly (to the moon) and simply made a film about it.' But his comments are certain to be seen as a deliberate attempt to suggest there is reason to doubt the lunar landing was real – especially as he also attacked the US investigation into FIFA corruption. It also comes despite Nasa admitting six years ago that the footage no longer existed after accidentally being erased. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:08pm
https://youtu.be/Sy0Lc7uX8Ug
Faking the Moon Landing - Stanley Kubrick & NASA’s Noble Lie with Bart Sibrel |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:09pm
moon hoaxers hate real footage ,
and with this in mind we bring more facts and real photos from the kubrick movie masterpiece , the nasa moon hoax |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:10pm
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/gallery/ScienceCover.html
This animated gif shows how particles move through Earth’s radiation belts, the large donuts around Earth. The sphere in the middle shows a cloud of colder material called the plasmasphere. New research shows that the plasmasphere helps keep fast electrons from the radiation belts away from Earth. there is only logically 1 way to get past these belts circa 1969 and that is kubrick take a bow ! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:11pm
lets be realistic
kubrick was a genius.. whodathunk it right ? sticky tape paper and cheap metal shop props https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uazzYgghQD4 check out 4:44 one more time bravo good sir , bravo ! namaste |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 4:12pm
watch this for 2 minutes from the start
you will at least triple your intellect upon this subject yet either way be at peace https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3jrLXkuKcw landing safely on the moon is SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE Published on May 16, 2014 anyone who still wants to desperately cling to the romantic and pathetic notion that man actually landed on the moon, with all the wealth of information and facts and points disputing and refuting or at the very least casting doubt on that notion, needs some therapy at this point...for relentless cognitive dissonance and stupid stubbornness. It's physically and scientifically impossible (not just improbable, but IMPOSSIBLE) for man (especially in the late 1960's and early 70's) to ever even get near the moon safely, let alone land on it, walk around on it, BS on it, ride around on it, and then leave it, to safely, with no real problem or harm, land back on the earth. With the moon being about 240,000 miles away from the earth. And where man never goes beyond about 300 miles. Or if he's extra adventurous, maybe about 400 miles above the earth...well below the high radiation levels. The Van Allen Radiation belts start at about 1000 miles. And then an additional 25,000 miles above the earth. No spacecraft today (or in the past decades now) goes up to 1000 miles. Why is that? Indications that man never went to the moon in the first place. Science fiction is not science fact. Neither are elaborate stage productions, and BS black-and-white third-generation video feeds. Wake up. Enjoy some actual reality for once in your life on this matter. Brutal and cold reality as it may be. The deadly Van Allen Radiation Belts are just ONE of the many problems, all the known (and unknown) hazards that make any manned trip to the moon and back scientifically impossible and very prohibitive, to say the least. So are Solar Flares and Solar Storms, that can kill and harm very fast. See the whole video if you can, and carefully listen to and examine the facts, issues, and points. Lose the drone-tarddery and herd-mentality already. This world is full of lies. Including...nay, ESPECIALLY...the United States of America. (Along with her Mother England) With all the corruption and greed. Yes, uh, really. Wake up. Seriously..... Category Education |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:30pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:07am:
Do you know much about photography? Why can't you see stars during the day? Stars are very dim and the light reflected by the Earth and the Moon is just so much brighter. To take good pictures in space you need to have a high shutter speed and a very short exposure, which means our planet and satellite are clearly visible but the stars often can't be seen. Fast exposure times means they can get good pictures of the bright Earth or lunar surface, but it also means no stars in the picture. Even in space, stars are relatively dim, and simply don't produce enough light to show up in photos set for bright sunlight. The problem is not just an exclusive issue in space, either. Try and take a photo of the night sky on your mobile phone. How many stars do you see? And what happens if you try to take a picture of something in the foreground, do you still see the stars behind? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:33pm Raven wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:30pm:
so in space its daytime with no atmosphere ? with a black background ?? ooookaaaay .. :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:37pm
::)
it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:33pm:
There is a very large, very bright object in the sky that dominates our solar system. Other stars are too far away and to dim to compete. Can you see stars during the day? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:39pm Raven wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:37pm:
there is no daytime in space :o |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:41pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:39pm:
That's correct but... There is a very large, very bright object in the sky that dominates our solar system. Other stars are too far away and to dim to compete. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:53pm Raven wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:41pm:
oooookaaaaay :) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:59pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 7:53pm:
When it's bright outside, because of that big sphere of plasma traversing across the sky. Can you see other stars? Why not? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:58pm
Light also believes that the Great Pyramids were used to store grains by some Biblical character. There is no reason to engage this playground pervert.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 12:44am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:58pm:
Oh there is one reason, it's so much fun! Raven especially loves it when he demands you answer him but deflects whenever you ask him something. He's like a little ignorant parrot that you can play with. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 7:36am
I know you like to " guess" , and yet
lets go with science and fact here lets start with the " lighting anomalies " https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic&feature=youtu.be What Happened On the Moon? - Analysis of the Lunar Photography lets start investigating here @ 40:00 minutes .. explain the anomaly @ 40:10* |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 7:39am AiA wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:58pm:
this is the mentality of AiA , calls people names when he is bested on any intellectual topic he dares to engage in .. sadly this happens all the time because he is a chronic sex addict always starting up deviant sex threads as we all know . and then he tries to be a grown up and join intellectual discussion and gets smashed like a watermelon dropping from the 10th floor sad little man . loses again and calls silly non factual names this is AiA's new visual description until he becomes an adult and joins in as one |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Ajax on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:02am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:33am:
.......................... 8-) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Ajax on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:09am
Who believes that thing in the photo can fly someone 388,440 km across space keeping them warm and safe from radiation.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:11am
welcome Ajax ! a great contributor and intellectual powerhouse !
:) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Ajax on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:17am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:11am:
G'day light well thanks dude never been described like that before. Seriously I too do not believe that man has gone to the moon. Too many holes in the official story. Modern day astronauts saying they have to work out a way to get through the VAB well haven't they already solved this problem, oh but wait we know what the lunar module was made of and it didn't give any protection against that type of radiation. Keep up the good work, people that always believe the official story are nothing more than sheep who cannot think for themselves.... :) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:19am Ajax wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:17am:
many blessings ,all we can do is guide those that can not see yet , we have all been hoodwinked at one point or another, and yet truth must prevail now namaste |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:52am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:11am:
There is no intellect involved in absurd fringe conspiracy theories. They only make the believer feel special - that is their attraction according to researchers. Are you special? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 6:48pm
https://youtu.be/zhp-FTYSGe8
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 6:56pm Raven wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 6:48pm:
this guy is a total moron and brings no facts whatsoever , this is your last chance then you will be ignored .. lets look at facts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic&feature=youtu.be What Happened On the Moon? - Analysis of the Lunar Photography lets start investigating here @ 40:00 minutes .. explain the anomaly @ 40:10* |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by xeej on Oct 27th, 2019 at 7:03pm
You have convinced me Light, it throws all my theories out the window.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:17pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 26th, 2019 at 10:07am:
I know I've tried to go through this kind of thing with Light before and it's pointless but have you noticed the bigger the city the less stars you see? In space the light of the sun can overwhelm other light sources. https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/26788/why-can-i-never-see-any-stars-in-the-night-sky/26793 |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:23pm Setanta wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:17pm:
lets look at facts https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yo5w0pm24ic&feature=youtu.be What Happened On the Moon? - Analysis of the Lunar Photography lets start investigating here @ 40:00 minutes .. explain the anomaly @ 40:10* |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:43pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:23pm:
There is no point. No amount of evidence will sway you. I gave up this futile endeavour long ago. Just be happy in yourself, enjoy your moonshadow. I would encourage you to let others like myself be ignorant in your eyes without damnation. You have nothing to prove if you are right. Let them go in peace. ;) Nameste. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:02pm Setanta wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 8:43pm:
your defeat and subjugation is duly noted and accepted , with so very much love, and big hugs namaste ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:09pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:02pm:
I do not hold up a white flag Light, there is not defeat at your hands it is just a matter of knowing when... |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:13pm
there is no argument ,
simply admit defeat , then move on , or explain the anomaly here @ 40:00 https://youtu.be/yo5w0pm24ic ╰დ╮ॐ╭დ╯ |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:34pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 6:56pm:
Of course. You get to post absolute b.ullshit but no one else can. Sorry Raven forgot how your mind works. The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they hold themselves up as skeptics, but they are actually quite gullible. There is a rampant double standard for evidence: no evidence is good enough to convince them of something they do NOT want to believe, yet only the flimsiest evidence is required to get them to accept something they DO want to believe. Of course Raven will be ignored because Light is a one trick pony. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:41pm Raven wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:34pm:
;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:43pm
It is better to let it slide. The people that will believe will believe, the people that will question and search will do that. Anyway, there is no ground to be made with Light.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:43pm
The Raven is right.
It_is_the_Light is an Artist in a Political Forum. A verbally dyslexic Yoda of the Force. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:46pm Jasin wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:43pm:
I'm not sure that is what he was saying Jasin. ;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:57pm Jasin wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:43pm:
"Yes, moon landing happened it did not. Ignore opposing evidence I will" |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Oct 27th, 2019 at 10:06pm Raven wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 9:57pm:
To not have your time wasted, the safest that will be. There are far better things to spend your time on Raven. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 27th, 2019 at 10:14pm Setanta wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 10:06pm:
YODA_it_is_the is a laugh. Entertainment he is. Sucks the likes of Sad_Kangaroo, AiA & Longweekend in big time! ;D Can see steam rising from their ears! ;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 11:29pm Setanta wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 10:06pm:
Enjoy his posts Raven does. Like baiting an ignorant parrot it is. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 27th, 2019 at 11:31pm Jasin wrote on Oct 27th, 2019 at 10:14pm:
Enlightened he claims to be. Sad to see, his wilful ignorance. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 28th, 2019 at 3:08am
Mr Light is a blithering clotpole whose convictions art so firm yond they replace the needeth for a penis.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 28th, 2019 at 9:53am
I enjoy It_is_the_Light's posts and 'believe' them more
- than any crap that that closet gay loser GreggaryPeccary posts. The guy is nothing but a Turd who want's to share its worms around here. Put that into perspective AiA and you might find yourself having a 'harmless' laugh at ITIL's entertainment. ;) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 28th, 2019 at 10:06am
flip
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 12:35pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pXSGocWifAg&feature=youtu.be
David Bowie - Space Oddity live excellent quality |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 12:36pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 28th, 2019 at 1:52pm
f*ucker ;D
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 1:58pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 2:04pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 2:07pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 2:08pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 2:09pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 6:54pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5agt0cpxsKU
Kate Bush - Rocket Man - Official Music Video |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bobby. on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:02pm
master Light - the original please:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_QZe8Z66x8 |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:10pm Bobby. wrote on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:02pm:
perfection , Brave Knight |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:18pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_ApBrVJD48
Across the universe - The Beatles (LYRICS/LETRA) [Original] |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:22pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIi5jpCiKL8
Comet's Death Dive Into Sun Snapped by SOHO Spacecraft oh wow , here is the SOHO observatory observation of the SUN or star in this SOL / SOLAR system .. look at all the stars in the background ????? well THATS strange ?????? when we have this photoshop rubbish from NASA .. ??? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 9:51am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:04am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:04am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 28th, 2019 at 7:22pm:
No two cameras are set up that same. The ones taken to the moon were set up for the dayside of the moon, which is extremely bright, so they had short exposure times to avoid oversaturating the camera as a result relatively dim stars don't show up. In the SOHO pics they aren't looking at the brightness of a daytime moon, so the exposure times are longer and thus the stars show up. Its actually very basic photography. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:05am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:06am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:04am:
nice try fail * |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:11am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:06am:
You do realise just stating fail doesn't work right? Wheres your evidence that my point is incorrect |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:13am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:11am:
yeah , it works |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:17am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:04am:
no because the SOHO satellite IS LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SUN !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND STARS ARE IN THE BACKGROUND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:18am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:13am:
1. It doesn't work. 2. It's realise. Not realize, we aren't Yanks or Canadian. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:19am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:17am:
Thanks dude I know what SOHO does, thats why they have that big filter on the pics. to block out the effect of the Sun on the camera., |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Yadda on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:19am light, You have the best .GIF files !!!! :) ;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:20am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:19am:
YOU FAIL , LOL ! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:22am Yadda wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:19am:
:) :) :) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:23am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:19am:
you fail * |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:26am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:26am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 10:20am:
So what in my statement is incorrect? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 7:21pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 30th, 2019 at 7:50pm
Argument from incredulity. You don't understand photography so it must be faked.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:25pm
He's right Bojack.
Today I took a photo that I knew would happen before it actually happened. I time travelled but a moment into the future, which gave me the foresight to prepare for that present moment when I took the winning photo shot. It_is_the_Light is just letting you know that he can kick your butt in a fight and has enjoyed the company of women far more than you. In a $$$Lucky Country$$$, he is light years ahead of you when getting the chicks. ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:25pm
He's right Bojack.
Today I took a photo that I knew would happen before it actually happened. I time travelled but a moment into the future, which gave me the foresight to prepare for that present moment when I took the winning photo shot. It_is_the_Light is just letting you know that he can kick your butt in a fight and has enjoyed the company of women far more than you. In a $$$Lucky Country$$$, he is light years ahead of you when getting the chicks. ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:31pm Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 7:50pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:33pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:36pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 7:21pm:
Hahaha. Light thinks that a handheld camera from 1968 should be able to filter out the light from the sun in the same way a camera from 1995 that was specifically designed for the task can. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:39pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 7:21pm:
https://youtu.be/PIi5jpCiKL8 SOHO looks at the Sun and you can see stars in the background this " moon photo " ( TOTAL CGI !!! ) has NO STARS IN THE BACKGROUND |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:40pm
http://nightflight.com/operation-lune-how-stanley-kubrick-faked-the-apollo-11-moon-landing/
“Opération Lune”: How Stanley Kubrick faked the Apollo 11 moon landing “In six days God created the heavens and the earth. On the seventh day, Stanley Kubrick sent everything back for modifications.” So begins the voiceover narration for Opération Lune (English title: Dark Side of the Moon), William Karel’s 2002 French documentary exposé on how director Stanley Kubrick helped NASA fake the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. The documentary featured interviews from many key players in NASA and the US government, including astronaut Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin, Alexander Haig, Richard Helms, Henry Kissinger, and Donald Rumsfeld, to name just a few, as well as Kubrick’s widow Christiane Kubrick and her brother, his surviving brother-in-law, executive producer Jan Harlan. It begins with the startling revelation that Kubrick was approached to film footage for the Apollo 11 moon landing in a studio setting; NASA had wanted a fallback contingency plan in case astronaut Neil Armstrong’s first steps could not be filmed, knowing that this was going to be a global event seen worldwide. If there were any problems, and the actual first steps on the moon were not captured, then NASA and other branches of the U.S. government were afraid that it would cause unforeseeable problems, and perhaps even embolden our enemies, and so they wanted something to show viewers so that any issues that Apollo 11 were having could be dealt with privately. In exchange for creating this film footage, NASA would loan Kubrick a unique and secretive camera lens that he had wanted to use on his movie Barry Lyndon, which he was already involved with in production. That lens — identified as Carl Zeiss 50mm f/0.7, which had been designed by Zeiss in 1966 on a special request for the Apollo program — was initially created by NASA to be used by the U.S. government for the purposes of Cold War spying. The narrator tells us the lens was the only one capable of filming in pitch darkness (the narrator for the original French version was Philippe Faure, and was later redone in English by Andrew Solomon). Ten of these lens were made, and Barry Lyndon’s cinematographer, John Alcott, claimed that Kubrick brought three of the leftover lenses from this batch that had been sold to NASA, and they had to be extensively modified for him to be able to use on his 35mm movie camera (one of the lenses is located in the German Movie Museum in Frankfurt). Kubrick with NASA officials in the late 60s. Left to right: Frederick Ordway (in white), Deke Slayton, Arthur C. Clarke, unidentified man (behind Clarke), Stanley Kubrick, George Mueller Arthur C. Clarke talking to Kubrick in England. George Mueller of NASA is on the far right. Co-produced by Point du Jour Production and ARTE France, the documentary was first air on French TV on October 16, 2002, and there was quite a bit of interest in the topic of whether or not Kubrick had filmed this footage. It was aired again on SBS TV in Australia on April 1, 2003 (note the date), and then a year later, at least ten television channels worldwide on the same calendar date, April 1, 2004, and afterwards the TV audience were treated to a debate, and also sent to a website which featured an interview with the director. In England it was aired on Channel 4, but not until September that same year (initially the BBC had rejected it because they perceived it as being part of an “anti-American campaign” in French documentaries), and in 2005, it was broadcast on the Canadian TV series “The Passionate Eye”, who described it this way: How could the flag flutter when there’s no wind on the moon? During an interview with Stanley Kubrick’s widow an extraordinary story came to light. She claims Kubrick and other Hollywood producers were recruited to help the U.S. win the high stakes race to the moon. In order to finance the space program through public funds, the U.S. government needed huge popular support, and that meant they couldn’t afford any expensive public relations failures. Fearing that no live pictures could be transmitted from the first moon landing, President Nixon enlisted the creative efforts of Kubrick, whose 2001: a Space Odyssey (1968) had provided much inspiration, to ensure promotional opportunities wouldn’t be missed. In return, Kubrick got a special NASA lens to help him shoot Barry Lyndon (1975). all having a good ole belly laugh at the masonic signs being displayed the " profane " ( you ) are so stupid ! they say |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:41pm :D :D :D :D |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:42pm
Light_it_is_the
believes that GregarryPeccary is a Hoax. That the 'Peckerhead' is a fraudulent conspiracy designed by the controversial Lab Scientist Bojack Horseman who has years of experience learning from Mice. ;D ;D ;D ;D Bah - i kill myself sometimes. ;D ;D ;D Bahaha |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:42pm
http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/wikileaks-documents-reveal-apollo-program-was-a-fraud-moon-landings-never-happened/
WIKILEAKS DOCUMENTS REVEAL APOLLO PROGRAM WAS A FRAUD, MOON LANDINGS NEVER HAPPENED New documents scheduled to be released this week by Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, could reveal damaging information about NASA’s Apollo program, believe experts. Julian Assange, who has lived at Ecuador’s London embassy since June 2012 in fear of being extradited to the United States to face espionage and conspiracy charges arising from the leaking of thousands of secret diplomatic and military documents by US Army private Chelsea Manning, has announced that he will release incriminating evidence that the government of the Unites States of America and NASA have hidden the truth about the Apollo program and the lunar landings for more than 40 years. « These documents reveal the true reason behind the Apollo program deception and how this all played out in the Cold War strategy of the government of the United States at the time » – Julian Assange, Wikileaks founder The documents are said to have been handed to the WikiLeaks founder by a “retired high ranking official of NASA that has worked within the government for over 45 years”, Assange told reporters. WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is about to reveal documents that could prove the Apollo space program was an elaborate scheme to dupe the Russians into a space race that never occurred Damaging information for NASA The documents to be released this week could cause up a stir weeks after NASA has announced it is preparing for another moon landing mission in 2030. «These documents that have been entrusted to me come from a highly known and respected high ranking official of the U.S. government who desires to leave this as a testament to the world before he dies. His desire is to stay anonymous as to not embroil his family and friends into a major polemic that could possibly destroy their lives» he told reporters. Top officials of the Chinese space program last year accused the government of the United States of “faking” the moon landings after the Chinese lunar rover found no evidence of the Apollo program moon landings after investigating the same area where the Apollo 11 mission allegedly landed on 20 July 1969. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:45pm Jasin wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:42pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:47pm Raven wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:36pm:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:32am
Time for another banning.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:36am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:32am:
truth hurts huh ? time to get another drug shot to calm you down maybe ?? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:42am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:32am:
*Bojack, not being a Mod, waves his little Fairy wand with a Star on it for being the best and fairest. Imagine the Hillary Clinton dummy spit he'd have if the Mods ignored his 'wish'. ;D We don't see Bojack complain about GreggaryPeccary. ::) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:42am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:32am:
*Bojack, not being a Mod, waves his little Fairy wand with a Star on it for being the best and fairest. Imagine the Hillary Clinton dummy spit he'd have if the Mods ignored his 'wish'. ;D We don't see Bojack complain about GreggaryPeccary. ::) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:45am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:48am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:48am
We all know Bojack, Sad Kangaroo, Longy, etc all BULLY It_is_the_Light's beliefs because it makes them feel more intellectually smarter about themselves.
It_is_the_Light is merely defending himself against their Bullying. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:49am
yeah, maybe they should go to the moon in one of these ..
because this is my planet here .. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:51am
looks stable enough ..
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:51am
Bully? I didnt call anyone a retard.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:51am:
Yes, because what forces does it need to worry about? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:32am:
He needs to go. When does Vic return? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am AiA wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am:
maybe hes gone to the moon ..? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:55am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:00am
Seriously whos the mod?
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:02am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:00am:
NASA silly .. but they went off planet in one of these .. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:04am AiA wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 8:53am:
Fair dinkum you two. It_is_the_Light's Lunacy is nothing compared to GreggaryPeccary Psychosis like a HPNS paranoia while being Bent. VIC has just come back from a nice Holiday and you both wanna hammer him with complaining. ::) |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:09am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:00am:
Jovial Monk is the only member who comes close to this amount of spam. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:14am Jasin wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:04am:
SO use of the word retard is fine with you. Cool |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:14am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:02am:
] Yes yes they did. Care to explain how they didn't? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by AiA on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:16am
flip
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:37am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:14am:
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:40am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:14am:
Gee - just 'one' against Pecker's so many. ::) You obviously can't see the Big Picture, kinda small in your Lab ain't it. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:42am Jasin wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:40am:
So you can produce these so many? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:44am it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:37am:
So no answer? OK |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:55am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 9:42am:
*sigh ::) So you want me to go back through everywhere and post them here, digging away like an Archivist that should get $50 off you for the effort. Sorry, I only specialise in Topics and for Members only. If you would like to become a Member, please fill out this 42 to page booklet of which you can purchase for $42. Tell me Bojack - the Blue Brunette. Why don't you make an effort of posting 'Topics' for discussion based upon 'your life', rather than just sit on the sidelines booing everyone else's? You're worse than Dr Mengele. At least AiA makes an effort in that regard. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Bojack Horseman on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:02am
And go.
|
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by .JaSin. on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:08am Prime Minister for Canyons wrote on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:02am:
Is that like Hipster slang or something? Yeah well - how's that doing for you? Kiss my Punk arse! |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:16am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:17am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 10:20am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 4:01pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 4:05pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 4:06pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Oct 31st, 2019 at 7:44pm |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 1st, 2019 at 6:57pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zd2D3MKX3YE
'The Eagle Has Landed' |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Raven on Nov 22nd, 2019 at 8:23pm it_is_the_light wrote on Oct 30th, 2019 at 11:47pm:
That's all you can do isn't it? The problem with conspiracy theorists is that they hold themselves up as skeptics, but they are actually quite gullible. There is a rampant double standard for evidence: no evidence is good enough to convince them of something they do NOT want to believe, yet only the flimsiest evidence is required to get them to accept something they DO want to believe. |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by Setanta on Nov 22nd, 2019 at 9:23pm Raven wrote on Nov 22nd, 2019 at 8:23pm:
Much like religion? |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by it_is_the_light on Nov 23rd, 2019 at 7:05am |
|
Title: Re: Earthrise Post by freediver on May 23rd, 2026 at 11:04am
This Topic was moved here from Fringe by freediver.
|
|
Australian Politics Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.5.2! YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved. |